SlideShare a Scribd company logo
A presentation by
Anass Bensabbouh
OUTLINE
I. Cohesion
II.Coherence
III.Rhetorical Structure Theory
IV.Connectivity Theory
Cohesion
 refers to the connections which have their manifestation in the
discourse itself. It is the grammatical and lexical ways in which the
elements of a text are linked together. Cohesion occurs when the
interpretation of one item in the text depends on the other.
An octopus is an air-filled curtain with seven heads and
three spike-filled fingers, which poke in frills and furls at
ribbon-strewed buttons.
 The octopus definition above is cohesive but NOT coherent.
Amy went to the party. She sat with Sara.
Types of cohesive ties
1) Substitution: Substitution occurs when an item is replaced by
another item in the text to avoid repetition.
There are three main types of substitution:
a) Nominal substitution
This car is old. I will buy a new one
b) Verbal substitution
A: Have you called the doctor?
B: I haven’t done yet, but I will do.
A: Well, I think you should do.
c) Clausal substitution
A: Do you think the teacher is going to be absent tomorrow?
B: No. I don’t think so.
2) Ellipsis: Ellipsis is the process of omitting an unnecessary item, which
has been mentioned earlier in text, and replacing it with nothing
 Substitution by ZERO.
There are three main types of Ellipsis:
a) Nominal Ellipsis
My brothers like sports. In fact, both [0] love football.
b) Verbal Ellipsis
He participated in the debate, but you didn’t [0].
c) Clausal Ellipsis
A: Who is writing on the board?
B: Alice is [0].
3) Reference: The situation in which one element cannot be
semantically interpreted unless it referred to another element in the
text.
Reference may either be exophoric or endophoric
a) Exophoric Reference: requires the reader to infer the interpreted
referent by looking beyond the text.
This is a great idea!
b) Endophoric Reference: The referent lies within the text itself.
There are two types of endophoric reference:
i. Anaphoric: refers back to something already mentioned.
Amy went to the party. She sat with Sara.
ii. Cataphoric: refers forward to something that will be mentioned.
As soon as he arrived, Mike visited his parents.
4) Conjunction: the relationship which indicates how the subsequent
sentence or clause should be linked to the preceding or the following
one. Conjunctions structure the text in a certain logical order.
There are four types of conjunctions:
a) Additive: connect units that share semantic similarity.
and, likewise, furthermore, in addition, etc.
b) Temporal: express the time order of events.
finally, then, soon, at the same time, etc.
c) Causal: introduce results, reasons, or purposes.
so, thus, therefore, because, etc.
d) Adversative: express contrasting results or opinions.
but, however, in contrast, whereas, etc.
5) Lexical cohesion: involves the choice of vocabulary. It is concerned
with the relationship that exists between lexical items in a text such
as words and phrases. It includes two types:
a) Reiteration: Two items that share the same referent and could either
be repeated or have similar meanings in a text. It includes 5 types:
i. Repetition: I met a man there. The man was very angry.
ii. Synonymy: I ate a tasty cake. It was really delicious.
iii. Hyponymy/hyperonymy: We were shopping for furniture. We saw
a lovely table.
iv. Meronymy: This apple comes from that tree.
v. Antonymy: Old music is completely different from new one.
b) Collocation: combination of vocabulary items that co-occur together.
Tom always eats fast food in the school bus.
Coherence
 Essentially coherence is concerned with the content of a text, the
meaning it is attempting to convey. When texts are not coherent, they
do not make sense or they make it difficult for the reader to follow and
understand.
 Interlocutors strategically use cohesive devices to make sure that
coherence can be established. As a result, coherence construction can
be considered a collaborative and interactive process between
addresser and addressee.
 Readers and writers collaborate in making a text coherent.
 coherence is variable and scalar, since its construction depends on the
personal experiences and world knowledge of individual recipients.
 Discourse relations play an essential role in making coherence. They
describe how two segments of discourse are logically and/or
structurally connected to one another.
The government has taken emergency measures. They will become
effective next year.
I will do some extra exercises this evening. I want to fully understand
this difficult lesson.
 These relations can be classified in different ways according to specific
characteristics which they share.
Elaboration
Purpose
Rhetorical Structure Theory
 Developed in the 1980s by William Mann and Sandra Thompson.
 Rhetorical Structure Theory is a theory of text organization which
provides a framework for an analysis of text. The theory is based on
the understanding that a text is not merely a string of clauses, but
consists instead of hierarchically organized groups of clauses that
stand in various relations to one another.
 RST analysis:
 Starts by dividing a text into minimal units (clauses)
 Labels the connection between these units by choosing a relation
name (over 20 relations).
Subject matter relations Presentational relations
Elaboration
Circumstance
Solutionhood
Volitional cause
Volitional result
Non-volitional cause
Non-volitional result
Purpose
Condition
Interpretation
Evaluation
Restatement
Summary
Sequence
Contrast
Motivation
Antithesis
Background
Enablement
Evidence
Justification
Concession
Discourse Connection in Discourse Analysis
Discourse Connection in Discourse Analysis
Connectivity Theory
 The theory was developed by Renkema (2009).
 It takes into account the limitations of RST, and works on both formal
linking devices and unexpressed discourse relations.
 Using RST as a point of departure, it proposes an alternative taxonomy
of connections that relies on two fundamental principles and three
levels of connections.
2 principles
3 levels of
connection
Discursive
Dialogic
Conjunction
Adjunction
interjunction
 The discursive principle: discourse is regarded as an expanded
macroproposition. This means that discourse is the result of
intraclausal connections used interclausally.
 The dialogic principle: The dialogic principle refers to the permanent
interaction between text producer and recipient. The addresser to
some extent anticipates the addressee’s expectations and reactions
and on this basis proceeds after the end of syntactic units. If such
implied reader responses are formulated as questions, the written text
appears as a dialogue
Discourse Connection in Discourse Analysis
 Conjunction: the possible ways in which formal segments of discourse
are connected.
 location: the sequence of segments, including anaphoric and
cataphoric directions of referential pronouns.
 Ordination: the syntactic structuring such as subordination and
coordination
 Combination: A variety of cohesive devices.
 Adjunction: the type of connection between nominal concepts and
verbal events to form a proposition.
 Elaboration: information added to concepts.
Mary went to the market. It was a small market in the suburbs.
 Enhancement: information added to events.
Mary went to the market. It was a pleasant walk.
 Extension: information added to both concept and event.
Mary went to the market. Her husband took care of the children.
 Interjunction: the level on which the addresser contacts and interacts
with the addressee.
 Expressing: speaker expresses his/her thoughts.
They are almost asleep. Well, that is a sign of lack of interest.
 Processing: background information is provided to explain the
content of the first sentence.
They are almost asleep. It was such a hard day.
 Impressing: is a signal to the hearer.
They are almost asleep. Your speech was too long.

More Related Content

PPTX
Lexical cohesive analysis
PPTX
Politeness
PPTX
PPTX
Speech acts
PPTX
Language Acquisition
DOC
Discourse Analysis
PPTX
First Language Acquisition
PPTX
Pragmatic linguistics»
Lexical cohesive analysis
Politeness
Speech acts
Language Acquisition
Discourse Analysis
First Language Acquisition
Pragmatic linguistics»

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Gender, Politeness, and Stereotypes
PPTX
Semantics ppt
PPTX
Discourse analysis and language teaching
PPT
PRAGMATICS: SPEECH ACTS
PDF
Morphemes lane333-dr-shadiay-banjar-pptx-110930170415-phpapp02
PPT
Pragmatics: Deixis
PPTX
Conversation Analysid
PPTX
Discourse Analysis (Intro to Linguistics)
PPT
Pragmatics presupposition and entailnment
PPTX
Semantic Roles
PPTX
Discourse analysis and vocabulary
PPTX
Conversational implicature
PPTX
Assessing speaking assignment
PPTX
CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE
PPTX
Speaking and pronunciation
PPTX
PPT
LANGUAGE PRODUCTION IN PSYCOLINGUISTIC
PPTX
01 sociolinguistic
PPTX
Lexical cohesion
Gender, Politeness, and Stereotypes
Semantics ppt
Discourse analysis and language teaching
PRAGMATICS: SPEECH ACTS
Morphemes lane333-dr-shadiay-banjar-pptx-110930170415-phpapp02
Pragmatics: Deixis
Conversation Analysid
Discourse Analysis (Intro to Linguistics)
Pragmatics presupposition and entailnment
Semantic Roles
Discourse analysis and vocabulary
Conversational implicature
Assessing speaking assignment
CONVERSATION ANALYSIS-PREFERENCE STRUCTURE
Speaking and pronunciation
LANGUAGE PRODUCTION IN PSYCOLINGUISTIC
01 sociolinguistic
Lexical cohesion
Ad

Similar to Discourse Connection in Discourse Analysis (20)

PPTX
Discourse analysis and development course
PPTX
Discourse analysis and development course
PPT
Cohesion Types
PPT
Cohesion Types
PPT
Textual relations in the holy qur’an
PPT
Textual relations in the holy qur’an
PPTX
Grammatical Analysis of Discourse for Undergraduate.pptx
PPTX
Grammatical Analysis of Discourse for Undergraduate.pptx
ODP
Presentation of text linguistics
ODP
Presentation of text linguistics
ODP
Presentation of text linguistics
ODP
Presentation of text linguistics
PDF
The cohesion component
PDF
The cohesion component
PPTX
Reading and Writing- Coherence and Cohesion
PPTX
Reading and Writing- Coherence and Cohesion
PDF
Recognizing and interpreting cohesive devices
PDF
Recognizing and interpreting cohesive devices
Discourse analysis and development course
Discourse analysis and development course
Cohesion Types
Cohesion Types
Textual relations in the holy qur’an
Textual relations in the holy qur’an
Grammatical Analysis of Discourse for Undergraduate.pptx
Grammatical Analysis of Discourse for Undergraduate.pptx
Presentation of text linguistics
Presentation of text linguistics
Presentation of text linguistics
Presentation of text linguistics
The cohesion component
The cohesion component
Reading and Writing- Coherence and Cohesion
Reading and Writing- Coherence and Cohesion
Recognizing and interpreting cohesive devices
Recognizing and interpreting cohesive devices
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Introduction_to_Human_Anatomy_and_Physiology_for_B.Pharm.pptx
PPTX
PPT- ENG7_QUARTER1_LESSON1_WEEK1. IMAGERY -DESCRIPTIONS pptx.pptx
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
PDF
01-Introduction-to-Information-Management.pdf
PDF
The Lost Whites of Pakistan by Jahanzaib Mughal.pdf
PPTX
Pharma ospi slides which help in ospi learning
PDF
Saundersa Comprehensive Review for the NCLEX-RN Examination.pdf
PDF
102 student loan defaulters named and shamed – Is someone you know on the list?
PDF
RMMM.pdf make it easy to upload and study
PDF
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
PPTX
Renaissance Architecture: A Journey from Faith to Humanism
PPTX
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
PDF
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PPTX
Pharmacology of Heart Failure /Pharmacotherapy of CHF
PPTX
IMMUNITY IMMUNITY refers to protection against infection, and the immune syst...
PPTX
Microbial diseases, their pathogenesis and prophylaxis
PDF
Module 4: Burden of Disease Tutorial Slides S2 2025
PDF
grade 11-chemistry_fetena_net_5883.pdf teacher guide for all student
PDF
Microbial disease of the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems
Introduction_to_Human_Anatomy_and_Physiology_for_B.Pharm.pptx
PPT- ENG7_QUARTER1_LESSON1_WEEK1. IMAGERY -DESCRIPTIONS pptx.pptx
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
01-Introduction-to-Information-Management.pdf
The Lost Whites of Pakistan by Jahanzaib Mughal.pdf
Pharma ospi slides which help in ospi learning
Saundersa Comprehensive Review for the NCLEX-RN Examination.pdf
102 student loan defaulters named and shamed – Is someone you know on the list?
RMMM.pdf make it easy to upload and study
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
Renaissance Architecture: A Journey from Faith to Humanism
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
Pharmacology of Heart Failure /Pharmacotherapy of CHF
IMMUNITY IMMUNITY refers to protection against infection, and the immune syst...
Microbial diseases, their pathogenesis and prophylaxis
Module 4: Burden of Disease Tutorial Slides S2 2025
grade 11-chemistry_fetena_net_5883.pdf teacher guide for all student
Microbial disease of the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems

Discourse Connection in Discourse Analysis

  • 3. Cohesion  refers to the connections which have their manifestation in the discourse itself. It is the grammatical and lexical ways in which the elements of a text are linked together. Cohesion occurs when the interpretation of one item in the text depends on the other. An octopus is an air-filled curtain with seven heads and three spike-filled fingers, which poke in frills and furls at ribbon-strewed buttons.  The octopus definition above is cohesive but NOT coherent. Amy went to the party. She sat with Sara.
  • 4. Types of cohesive ties 1) Substitution: Substitution occurs when an item is replaced by another item in the text to avoid repetition. There are three main types of substitution: a) Nominal substitution This car is old. I will buy a new one b) Verbal substitution A: Have you called the doctor? B: I haven’t done yet, but I will do. A: Well, I think you should do. c) Clausal substitution A: Do you think the teacher is going to be absent tomorrow? B: No. I don’t think so.
  • 5. 2) Ellipsis: Ellipsis is the process of omitting an unnecessary item, which has been mentioned earlier in text, and replacing it with nothing  Substitution by ZERO. There are three main types of Ellipsis: a) Nominal Ellipsis My brothers like sports. In fact, both [0] love football. b) Verbal Ellipsis He participated in the debate, but you didn’t [0]. c) Clausal Ellipsis A: Who is writing on the board? B: Alice is [0].
  • 6. 3) Reference: The situation in which one element cannot be semantically interpreted unless it referred to another element in the text. Reference may either be exophoric or endophoric a) Exophoric Reference: requires the reader to infer the interpreted referent by looking beyond the text. This is a great idea! b) Endophoric Reference: The referent lies within the text itself. There are two types of endophoric reference: i. Anaphoric: refers back to something already mentioned. Amy went to the party. She sat with Sara. ii. Cataphoric: refers forward to something that will be mentioned. As soon as he arrived, Mike visited his parents.
  • 7. 4) Conjunction: the relationship which indicates how the subsequent sentence or clause should be linked to the preceding or the following one. Conjunctions structure the text in a certain logical order. There are four types of conjunctions: a) Additive: connect units that share semantic similarity. and, likewise, furthermore, in addition, etc. b) Temporal: express the time order of events. finally, then, soon, at the same time, etc. c) Causal: introduce results, reasons, or purposes. so, thus, therefore, because, etc. d) Adversative: express contrasting results or opinions. but, however, in contrast, whereas, etc.
  • 8. 5) Lexical cohesion: involves the choice of vocabulary. It is concerned with the relationship that exists between lexical items in a text such as words and phrases. It includes two types: a) Reiteration: Two items that share the same referent and could either be repeated or have similar meanings in a text. It includes 5 types: i. Repetition: I met a man there. The man was very angry. ii. Synonymy: I ate a tasty cake. It was really delicious. iii. Hyponymy/hyperonymy: We were shopping for furniture. We saw a lovely table. iv. Meronymy: This apple comes from that tree. v. Antonymy: Old music is completely different from new one. b) Collocation: combination of vocabulary items that co-occur together. Tom always eats fast food in the school bus.
  • 9. Coherence  Essentially coherence is concerned with the content of a text, the meaning it is attempting to convey. When texts are not coherent, they do not make sense or they make it difficult for the reader to follow and understand.  Interlocutors strategically use cohesive devices to make sure that coherence can be established. As a result, coherence construction can be considered a collaborative and interactive process between addresser and addressee.  Readers and writers collaborate in making a text coherent.  coherence is variable and scalar, since its construction depends on the personal experiences and world knowledge of individual recipients.
  • 10.  Discourse relations play an essential role in making coherence. They describe how two segments of discourse are logically and/or structurally connected to one another. The government has taken emergency measures. They will become effective next year. I will do some extra exercises this evening. I want to fully understand this difficult lesson.  These relations can be classified in different ways according to specific characteristics which they share. Elaboration Purpose
  • 11. Rhetorical Structure Theory  Developed in the 1980s by William Mann and Sandra Thompson.  Rhetorical Structure Theory is a theory of text organization which provides a framework for an analysis of text. The theory is based on the understanding that a text is not merely a string of clauses, but consists instead of hierarchically organized groups of clauses that stand in various relations to one another.  RST analysis:  Starts by dividing a text into minimal units (clauses)  Labels the connection between these units by choosing a relation name (over 20 relations).
  • 12. Subject matter relations Presentational relations Elaboration Circumstance Solutionhood Volitional cause Volitional result Non-volitional cause Non-volitional result Purpose Condition Interpretation Evaluation Restatement Summary Sequence Contrast Motivation Antithesis Background Enablement Evidence Justification Concession
  • 15. Connectivity Theory  The theory was developed by Renkema (2009).  It takes into account the limitations of RST, and works on both formal linking devices and unexpressed discourse relations.  Using RST as a point of departure, it proposes an alternative taxonomy of connections that relies on two fundamental principles and three levels of connections. 2 principles 3 levels of connection Discursive Dialogic Conjunction Adjunction interjunction
  • 16.  The discursive principle: discourse is regarded as an expanded macroproposition. This means that discourse is the result of intraclausal connections used interclausally.  The dialogic principle: The dialogic principle refers to the permanent interaction between text producer and recipient. The addresser to some extent anticipates the addressee’s expectations and reactions and on this basis proceeds after the end of syntactic units. If such implied reader responses are formulated as questions, the written text appears as a dialogue
  • 18.  Conjunction: the possible ways in which formal segments of discourse are connected.  location: the sequence of segments, including anaphoric and cataphoric directions of referential pronouns.  Ordination: the syntactic structuring such as subordination and coordination  Combination: A variety of cohesive devices.
  • 19.  Adjunction: the type of connection between nominal concepts and verbal events to form a proposition.  Elaboration: information added to concepts. Mary went to the market. It was a small market in the suburbs.  Enhancement: information added to events. Mary went to the market. It was a pleasant walk.  Extension: information added to both concept and event. Mary went to the market. Her husband took care of the children.
  • 20.  Interjunction: the level on which the addresser contacts and interacts with the addressee.  Expressing: speaker expresses his/her thoughts. They are almost asleep. Well, that is a sign of lack of interest.  Processing: background information is provided to explain the content of the first sentence. They are almost asleep. It was such a hard day.  Impressing: is a signal to the hearer. They are almost asleep. Your speech was too long.