SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Do You Value Freedom?
Let’s See:
[This slideshow was originally written as an early
introduction to the D.L. blog. It expands on the definition
of individual liberty as a core American value.]
As a principle, would you prefer others to direct your
life, or would you prefer to have the freedom to
direct your own life?
Answer this question and I will tell you who you
really are – and who you are not…
With this question we are reaching down to the
philosophical bottom line of your life – the
ideological core of your being. Please consciously
answer the above question to yourself before
continuing to read. (Voluntarily choosing to join the
military or other similar controlling group of service
to the country is still a free choice to direct one’s
own life.)
Now that you have answered the most important
ideological question ever asked of you, I will tell you
who you really are – and who you are not…
If you chose that you would prefer to have the
freedom to direct your own life, you are normal
(normal people desire freedom). But if you chose that
you would prefer others to direct your life (a type of
voluntary slavery), you have serious psychological
problems and probably need professional help
(maybe you would like to reconsider your answer
right now – no one needs to know). We can only deal
with the choice of desiring freedom here.
Above all, freedom means choice. Without freedom
to choose, there is no freedom – there is only slavery
(commonly known as tyranny). The more the
government restricts a person’s choice, the less
freedom a person has to direct his own life.
Therefore, the more a person supports government
limiting his choice, the more that person volunteers
to be a slave to a system of tyranny. It seems hardly
reasonable to volunteer oneself to be a slave. It is
beyond outrageous to demand that others be
coerced and cajoled into that same tyranny.
So, for those of you who are normal and desire
freedom, here are the principles of individual liberty:
• In your core belief of freedom to direct your own
life you do believe that what a person can be
responsible for in their life, they should be
responsible for.
Slaves are not responsible for themselves – the slave
master is. Free people are responsible for
themselves.
• In your core belief of freedom to direct your own
life you do believe that in principle everyone
should have the same freedom to direct their
own lives.
This point is very important. By choosing maximum
liberty for yourself, you also choose maximum liberty
for all other citizens. The alternative is the elitist who
claims privilege for some, but denying liberty for
others, or worse, denying some liberties for
everyone. This maximum liberty also applies to
domestic companies and associations which are run
by and employ the same people deserving of liberty,
and are thereby direct extensions of them.
• In your core belief of freedom to direct your own
life you do not believe that politically or
ideologically based laws, or political correctness
should selectively limit the liberty of any person,
company or association by jeopardizing the
future demographics of the nation.
This is where the wheels meet the road and this is
the flip side of the last point. Liberty for one must be
the same liberty for all in law and societal mores,
preserving a tradition of individual liberty in society
for future generations. If it isn’t the same for all in
every generation, it isn’t liberty – it is elitism
(tyranny). Again, this also applies to corporations
and associations by extension from individual
liberty.
• In your core belief of freedom to direct your own
life you do not believe that collective safety
should reach beyond that of policing,
emergency response, border control, national
security and defense, engineering stipulation,
and extreme hazard control.
Each person cannot individually make society safe,
so collective safety is allowable, as with police,
military, security agencies, etc. But deciding whether
it is safe for you to drink a supersized pop is an
individual choice. Collective safety is not a legitimate
tradeoff for the responsibility of one’s own individual
safety. When the government picks and chooses
which individual choices are allowable, that is not
freedom – it is the tyranny of mommyism.
• In your core belief of freedom to direct your own
life, you do believe that government regulations
should be minimal yet stringently enforced,
limiting as little as necessary your ability to direct
your life, and anyone else to direct their lives.
This parallels the last point. Minimal regulation,
stringently enforced provides for maximum liberty.
Tyrannical regulatory application which unduly limits
individual liberty in the name of safety is
unacceptable. Government in the area of regulation
should operate as a manager. It is not the
government’s job to reward some and punish others.
Government is not everybody’s mommy. You can
recognize when regulation over steps the bounds of
individual liberty when it feels like mommy made it
out of an irrational fear for your safety in order to
protect you from yourself, or when the mommy next
door threatens you with a spanking while her kids
hide behind her dress.
• In your core belief of freedom to direct your own
life, you do believe in a free marketplace to
preserve the liberty of everyone to choose and
direct their own lives.
Liberty for all in the marketplace can only be
guaranteed in a free marketplace. State interference
and manipulation of the marketplace outside of
necessary minimal regulation and collective safety
selectively limits the liberty of some and privileges
others.
• In your core belief of freedom to direct your own
life, you do believe that taxes should be
universal, but minimal for everyone, including by
extension corporations and associations, in order
to preserve the maximum individual liberty of
everyone.
Maintaining a minimal managerial government and
various adequate security apparatus requires tax
revenues adequate only for those purposes. Over-
taxing that turns managerial government into big-
mommy government restricts individual liberties.
Taxes should never be automatically deducted. They
should always be paid directly by the taxpayer so
that they can feel that they have skin in the game
every time they pay.
• In your core belief of freedom to direct your own
life, you do believe that charity with your money
is your business, and not the business of the
government. You desire to direct where your
charitable contributions go. You do not agree
that the government should coercively tax you or
others and then direct your and their money to
others against your/their objections, whether it is
welfare, healthcare, retirement, whatever.
Government is for management and maintenance of
a society (including emergency response). When the
government steps into redistribution of money
through taxation and dispersion, it over steps into
removing the liberty of citizens in deciding for
themselves where their charity goes. It is not
mommy’s job to redistribute a portion of your
allowance. Government is not your mommy, and
your money is not an allowance – it is your money.
• In your core belief of freedom to direct your own
life, you do not believe other countries who do
not place the same value on individual liberty
should be able to tell your country how to
operate.
Individual liberty trumps all other global concerns,
since individual liberty should also be all other
nations’ number one concern.
• In your core belief of freedom to direct your own
life, you do believe that individual liberties
should be protected as the fundamental law of
the country for all citizens (except traitors to the
country), and should be strictly adhered to at all
times, under strict penalty of law.
The government should be restricted by foundational
law from evolving into mommyism. This principle
should be taught in every year of school relentlessly,
so that citizens always defend their individual liberty.
Here is the conclusion:
• In your core belief of freedom to direct your own
life, you do not believe in collectivism
(mommyism).
• In your core belief of freedom to direct your own
life, you do believe in individual liberty.
Therefore:
• In your core belief of freedom to direct your own
life, you are not a contemporary liberal.
• In your core belief of freedom to direct your own
life, you are a contemporary conservative.
Yup, you read that correctly. Since you would prefer
to have the freedom to direct your own life, in your
core beliefs you are not a liberal – you are a
conservative. Conservatives believe in the universal
individual liberty that you chose. Liberals believe in
big-mommy collectivism which is antithetical to
individual liberty, and which you did not choose.
Contemporary liberalism is anti-freedom.
If after reading all of this you still think you can
continue to see yourself as a contemporary liberal or
progressive, you either lied to yourself (played
stupid) when you answered the original question of
this page - that you would prefer to have the
freedom to direct your own life, or you are lying to
yourself (playing stupid) now - that you think you
can both believe in individual liberty and still see
yourself as a liberal (or progressive).
This means that you have been captivated by an
inverse type of magical thinking that over-rides your
natural rejection of cognitive dissonance (believing
two obviously contradictory things at the same
time). Liberals submit to the principle of collective
direction of their lives by big-mommy government
(voluntary slavery), while delusionally believing that
their submission is an act of individual liberty.
(Convoluted much?)
This is a result of societal conditioning. Liberals don’t
defend their individual liberty, but in fact, voluntarily
give it away in exchange for what they have been
conditioned to believe will be a safe utopia where
mommy will take care of them. This is nothing more
than offering oneself in slavery to tyranny. However,
liberals didn’t choose this for themselves – it was
chosen for them by the circumstances of their lives
and conditioned into them. Everyone should
thoroughly understand this process so that this
liberal conditioning of accepting voluntary slavery
can be eliminated from society.
• A presentation by
deprogrammingliberalism.com
• Deprogramming Liberalism
Slideshow Series © 2013

More Related Content

PPT
Answers to media questions
PPT
Introduction b
PDF
Chapter 6 - Four Classic Theories of Ethics, The Ethical Journalist, Professo...
PPTX
Freedom of expression and cultural conflict
PPTX
Psychological egoism
PPT
Ethics 2. egoism vs altruism
PPT
Ethical Egoism
PPTX
Lecture 2.0 without audio
Answers to media questions
Introduction b
Chapter 6 - Four Classic Theories of Ethics, The Ethical Journalist, Professo...
Freedom of expression and cultural conflict
Psychological egoism
Ethics 2. egoism vs altruism
Ethical Egoism
Lecture 2.0 without audio

What's hot (19)

PPTX
Ethical egoism
PPT
Chapter 6
PPT
Ethics 2. egoism vs altruism (1)
PPT
Chapter 5: Egoism and Altruism
PDF
459s13 lecture2 3
PPTX
427 lecture liberalism-update (small)
PPT
Egoism
PPTX
What is citizenship?
PPTX
2. ethical theories part 2 (1)
PPTX
Ethical Egoism
PPTX
PPT
Ethics / Ethiek (under construction)
PPTX
Ethical egoism
PPTX
Realism and liberalism
PDF
PS 240 Anarchism spring 2014
PDF
Mill harm
PPTX
Realism v Liberalism
PPT
Reopublcan or taliban
PPTX
Kant - Explain Categorical Imperative
Ethical egoism
Chapter 6
Ethics 2. egoism vs altruism (1)
Chapter 5: Egoism and Altruism
459s13 lecture2 3
427 lecture liberalism-update (small)
Egoism
What is citizenship?
2. ethical theories part 2 (1)
Ethical Egoism
Ethics / Ethiek (under construction)
Ethical egoism
Realism and liberalism
PS 240 Anarchism spring 2014
Mill harm
Realism v Liberalism
Reopublcan or taliban
Kant - Explain Categorical Imperative
Ad

Similar to Do you value freedom #1 g (19)

PPT
Two concepts liberty
PPTX
Liberty
PDF
How Free Are You?
PDF
2009-09-12 FNF - What is Liberalism?
PPTX
Ethical Theory and Business
PDF
Literary Analysis Sample Essay High School
PPTX
Control of liberty
PDF
Sandel intro
PDF
Sandel intro
PPTX
Freedom
PPTX
PPTX
CC-1-Philo-freedom-of-the-human-person.pptx
PDF
Weekly Newsletter - How Does the State Intervene in Your Body
DOCX
Positionpaper
DOCX
Positionpaper
PDF
PDF
Sandel intro
PPTX
Vlad Tarko - The varieties of liberty ideals (freedom-talk.com)
PDF
Libertarianism and Modern Philosophers, Lecture 4 with David Gordon - Mises A...
Two concepts liberty
Liberty
How Free Are You?
2009-09-12 FNF - What is Liberalism?
Ethical Theory and Business
Literary Analysis Sample Essay High School
Control of liberty
Sandel intro
Sandel intro
Freedom
CC-1-Philo-freedom-of-the-human-person.pptx
Weekly Newsletter - How Does the State Intervene in Your Body
Positionpaper
Positionpaper
Sandel intro
Vlad Tarko - The varieties of liberty ideals (freedom-talk.com)
Libertarianism and Modern Philosophers, Lecture 4 with David Gordon - Mises A...
Ad

More from Axacta (10)

PPT
Explaining the liberal c
PDF
A liberal attempts to think a
PPT
Everything rush didn't a
PPT
Freeple or sheeple c
PDF
Fifty shades
PDF
Union reasoning c
PDF
Social justice versus liberty
PDF
Liberals hate america
PDF
Bewildered with misinformation
PPT
#1 why both
Explaining the liberal c
A liberal attempts to think a
Everything rush didn't a
Freeple or sheeple c
Fifty shades
Union reasoning c
Social justice versus liberty
Liberals hate america
Bewildered with misinformation
#1 why both

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Human Appeal in Gaza – Emergency Aid, Healthcare & Hope for Families.pdf
PDF
How India’s First AI-Powered Anganwadi in Nagpur is Changing Education – As F...
PDF
The Blogs_ Hamas’s Deflection Playbook _ Andy Blumenthal _ The Times of Israe...
PPTX
India’s Response to the Rohingya Refugee Crisis: Balancing National Security,...
PDF
Samaya Jyothi Live News Telugu | Breaking & Trusted Updates
PDF
4th-president-of-the-Philippines-_20250 812_103637_0000.pdf
PDF
Reviving Regional Truths: AI-Powered Journalism in Bangladesh
PDF
History ppt on World War 2 and its consequences
PDF
4th-president-of-the-Philippines-_20250 812_103637_0000.pdf
PDF
Pancasila & Citizen Resume PPT - Guest lecture
PPTX
POLY[1]....pptxtheiowqt4h3ioth4iofhe2toh42i0fhe2io3
PPTX
Sir Creek Conflict: History and its importance
PPTX
Rhythms of Freedom_ India Day Shines at Battery Dance Festival 2025.
PDF
Best 5 Sites for Verified Cash App Accounts – BTC & Instant Delivery.pdf
PPTX
15 Years of Fraud The Shocking Case of CA Impersonation.pptx
PPTX
Elias Salame Uses Fake Trades to Make Real Money Disappear.pptx
PDF
Naya Bharat Vision 2047_ Key Takeaways from This Year’s Independence Day Them...
PDF
Opher Bryer-The Rise and Fall of Opher Bryer How an AI Startup Turned from Pr...
PDF
Aron Govil on Why America Lacks Skilled Engineers.pdf
DOCX
End Of The Age TV Program: Depicting the Actual Truth in a World of Lies
Human Appeal in Gaza – Emergency Aid, Healthcare & Hope for Families.pdf
How India’s First AI-Powered Anganwadi in Nagpur is Changing Education – As F...
The Blogs_ Hamas’s Deflection Playbook _ Andy Blumenthal _ The Times of Israe...
India’s Response to the Rohingya Refugee Crisis: Balancing National Security,...
Samaya Jyothi Live News Telugu | Breaking & Trusted Updates
4th-president-of-the-Philippines-_20250 812_103637_0000.pdf
Reviving Regional Truths: AI-Powered Journalism in Bangladesh
History ppt on World War 2 and its consequences
4th-president-of-the-Philippines-_20250 812_103637_0000.pdf
Pancasila & Citizen Resume PPT - Guest lecture
POLY[1]....pptxtheiowqt4h3ioth4iofhe2toh42i0fhe2io3
Sir Creek Conflict: History and its importance
Rhythms of Freedom_ India Day Shines at Battery Dance Festival 2025.
Best 5 Sites for Verified Cash App Accounts – BTC & Instant Delivery.pdf
15 Years of Fraud The Shocking Case of CA Impersonation.pptx
Elias Salame Uses Fake Trades to Make Real Money Disappear.pptx
Naya Bharat Vision 2047_ Key Takeaways from This Year’s Independence Day Them...
Opher Bryer-The Rise and Fall of Opher Bryer How an AI Startup Turned from Pr...
Aron Govil on Why America Lacks Skilled Engineers.pdf
End Of The Age TV Program: Depicting the Actual Truth in a World of Lies

Do you value freedom #1 g

  • 1. Do You Value Freedom? Let’s See: [This slideshow was originally written as an early introduction to the D.L. blog. It expands on the definition of individual liberty as a core American value.]
  • 2. As a principle, would you prefer others to direct your life, or would you prefer to have the freedom to direct your own life? Answer this question and I will tell you who you really are – and who you are not…
  • 3. With this question we are reaching down to the philosophical bottom line of your life – the ideological core of your being. Please consciously answer the above question to yourself before continuing to read. (Voluntarily choosing to join the military or other similar controlling group of service to the country is still a free choice to direct one’s own life.)
  • 4. Now that you have answered the most important ideological question ever asked of you, I will tell you who you really are – and who you are not…
  • 5. If you chose that you would prefer to have the freedom to direct your own life, you are normal (normal people desire freedom). But if you chose that you would prefer others to direct your life (a type of voluntary slavery), you have serious psychological problems and probably need professional help (maybe you would like to reconsider your answer right now – no one needs to know). We can only deal with the choice of desiring freedom here.
  • 6. Above all, freedom means choice. Without freedom to choose, there is no freedom – there is only slavery (commonly known as tyranny). The more the government restricts a person’s choice, the less freedom a person has to direct his own life. Therefore, the more a person supports government limiting his choice, the more that person volunteers to be a slave to a system of tyranny. It seems hardly reasonable to volunteer oneself to be a slave. It is beyond outrageous to demand that others be coerced and cajoled into that same tyranny.
  • 7. So, for those of you who are normal and desire freedom, here are the principles of individual liberty:
  • 8. • In your core belief of freedom to direct your own life you do believe that what a person can be responsible for in their life, they should be responsible for.
  • 9. Slaves are not responsible for themselves – the slave master is. Free people are responsible for themselves.
  • 10. • In your core belief of freedom to direct your own life you do believe that in principle everyone should have the same freedom to direct their own lives.
  • 11. This point is very important. By choosing maximum liberty for yourself, you also choose maximum liberty for all other citizens. The alternative is the elitist who claims privilege for some, but denying liberty for others, or worse, denying some liberties for everyone. This maximum liberty also applies to domestic companies and associations which are run by and employ the same people deserving of liberty, and are thereby direct extensions of them.
  • 12. • In your core belief of freedom to direct your own life you do not believe that politically or ideologically based laws, or political correctness should selectively limit the liberty of any person, company or association by jeopardizing the future demographics of the nation.
  • 13. This is where the wheels meet the road and this is the flip side of the last point. Liberty for one must be the same liberty for all in law and societal mores, preserving a tradition of individual liberty in society for future generations. If it isn’t the same for all in every generation, it isn’t liberty – it is elitism (tyranny). Again, this also applies to corporations and associations by extension from individual liberty.
  • 14. • In your core belief of freedom to direct your own life you do not believe that collective safety should reach beyond that of policing, emergency response, border control, national security and defense, engineering stipulation, and extreme hazard control.
  • 15. Each person cannot individually make society safe, so collective safety is allowable, as with police, military, security agencies, etc. But deciding whether it is safe for you to drink a supersized pop is an individual choice. Collective safety is not a legitimate tradeoff for the responsibility of one’s own individual safety. When the government picks and chooses which individual choices are allowable, that is not freedom – it is the tyranny of mommyism.
  • 16. • In your core belief of freedom to direct your own life, you do believe that government regulations should be minimal yet stringently enforced, limiting as little as necessary your ability to direct your life, and anyone else to direct their lives.
  • 17. This parallels the last point. Minimal regulation, stringently enforced provides for maximum liberty. Tyrannical regulatory application which unduly limits individual liberty in the name of safety is unacceptable. Government in the area of regulation should operate as a manager. It is not the government’s job to reward some and punish others.
  • 18. Government is not everybody’s mommy. You can recognize when regulation over steps the bounds of individual liberty when it feels like mommy made it out of an irrational fear for your safety in order to protect you from yourself, or when the mommy next door threatens you with a spanking while her kids hide behind her dress.
  • 19. • In your core belief of freedom to direct your own life, you do believe in a free marketplace to preserve the liberty of everyone to choose and direct their own lives.
  • 20. Liberty for all in the marketplace can only be guaranteed in a free marketplace. State interference and manipulation of the marketplace outside of necessary minimal regulation and collective safety selectively limits the liberty of some and privileges others.
  • 21. • In your core belief of freedom to direct your own life, you do believe that taxes should be universal, but minimal for everyone, including by extension corporations and associations, in order to preserve the maximum individual liberty of everyone.
  • 22. Maintaining a minimal managerial government and various adequate security apparatus requires tax revenues adequate only for those purposes. Over- taxing that turns managerial government into big- mommy government restricts individual liberties. Taxes should never be automatically deducted. They should always be paid directly by the taxpayer so that they can feel that they have skin in the game every time they pay.
  • 23. • In your core belief of freedom to direct your own life, you do believe that charity with your money is your business, and not the business of the government. You desire to direct where your charitable contributions go. You do not agree that the government should coercively tax you or others and then direct your and their money to others against your/their objections, whether it is welfare, healthcare, retirement, whatever.
  • 24. Government is for management and maintenance of a society (including emergency response). When the government steps into redistribution of money through taxation and dispersion, it over steps into removing the liberty of citizens in deciding for themselves where their charity goes. It is not mommy’s job to redistribute a portion of your allowance. Government is not your mommy, and your money is not an allowance – it is your money.
  • 25. • In your core belief of freedom to direct your own life, you do not believe other countries who do not place the same value on individual liberty should be able to tell your country how to operate.
  • 26. Individual liberty trumps all other global concerns, since individual liberty should also be all other nations’ number one concern.
  • 27. • In your core belief of freedom to direct your own life, you do believe that individual liberties should be protected as the fundamental law of the country for all citizens (except traitors to the country), and should be strictly adhered to at all times, under strict penalty of law.
  • 28. The government should be restricted by foundational law from evolving into mommyism. This principle should be taught in every year of school relentlessly, so that citizens always defend their individual liberty.
  • 29. Here is the conclusion:
  • 30. • In your core belief of freedom to direct your own life, you do not believe in collectivism (mommyism).
  • 31. • In your core belief of freedom to direct your own life, you do believe in individual liberty.
  • 33. • In your core belief of freedom to direct your own life, you are not a contemporary liberal. • In your core belief of freedom to direct your own life, you are a contemporary conservative.
  • 34. Yup, you read that correctly. Since you would prefer to have the freedom to direct your own life, in your core beliefs you are not a liberal – you are a conservative. Conservatives believe in the universal individual liberty that you chose. Liberals believe in big-mommy collectivism which is antithetical to individual liberty, and which you did not choose. Contemporary liberalism is anti-freedom.
  • 35. If after reading all of this you still think you can continue to see yourself as a contemporary liberal or progressive, you either lied to yourself (played stupid) when you answered the original question of this page - that you would prefer to have the freedom to direct your own life, or you are lying to yourself (playing stupid) now - that you think you can both believe in individual liberty and still see yourself as a liberal (or progressive).
  • 36. This means that you have been captivated by an inverse type of magical thinking that over-rides your natural rejection of cognitive dissonance (believing two obviously contradictory things at the same time). Liberals submit to the principle of collective direction of their lives by big-mommy government (voluntary slavery), while delusionally believing that their submission is an act of individual liberty. (Convoluted much?)
  • 37. This is a result of societal conditioning. Liberals don’t defend their individual liberty, but in fact, voluntarily give it away in exchange for what they have been conditioned to believe will be a safe utopia where mommy will take care of them. This is nothing more than offering oneself in slavery to tyranny. However, liberals didn’t choose this for themselves – it was chosen for them by the circumstances of their lives and conditioned into them. Everyone should thoroughly understand this process so that this liberal conditioning of accepting voluntary slavery can be eliminated from society.
  • 38. • A presentation by deprogrammingliberalism.com • Deprogramming Liberalism Slideshow Series © 2013