SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Drawing lessons from the unwieldy reforms of EU-ETS:
Combining price and quantity management
Christian de Perthuis
Professor at Paris-Dauphine University
European University Institute
Florence School of Regulation - Climate, Tuesday 9 May 2017
2
Outline
 Do we need a carbon price signal ?
– Short term: A comparison between the UK and Germany
– Long term: “Carbon rent” versus Oil rent
 Lessons from past experience
– A brief history of EU-ETS
– The three main drivers of EU-ETS shortcomings
– Challenges of the reform
 Combining Price and Quantity-based Management
– Limits of the current reform
– Restoring the carbon price signal through a price-corridor
– Political feasibility ?
– Medium term possible co-benefits
Do we need a carbon price signal ?
– Short term: A comparison between the UK and Germany
– Long term: “Carbon rent” versus Oil rent
4
EU ETS emissions since 2005 : Germany vs. UK
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
ETSemissions(aviationexcl.)-Base100=2005
Germany UK
Impact of UK carbon price floor (introduced in 2013)
Source: Climate Economics Chair, EUTL data
5
The economics of oil rent
Oil price ($/bbl)
investments
20
200
Conventional
Deposits
Offshore &
Oil Shales
Extreme
Conditions (Ex : Arctic)
Source : Climate Economics Chair
6
The economics of « Carbon Rent »
Carbon price (€/tCO2)
investments
20
200
Coal phase-out
Oil phase-out
Natural gas
pase-out
Possible impacts
of CCS ?
Conventional
Unconventional
Source : Climate Economics Chair
Lessons from past experience
– A brief history of EU-ETS
– The three main drivers of the EU-ETS shortcomings
– Challenges of the reform
8
A brief history of EU-ETS
Source: Climate Economics Chair
? (UK?)
9
A brief history of EU-ETS : three main results
 More Complexity
– Ex: Rules for free allocations
– Ex: Rules for the use of auction revenues
– Ex: Rules for the projected « stability reserve »
– Complexity is costly!
 Less flexibility
– Impossibility of adjusting the cap within a phase
– A major governance issue: How to manage unexpected shocks?
 Less predictability
– Ex : Uncertainty on the cap
– Ex : how to anticipate future carbon prices?
10
What is your carbon price anticipation ?
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Jan-14 Jan-15 Jan-16 Jan-17
€/tCO2
EUA Phase 1 (Spot) EUA Phase 2 et 3 (Futures Dec. Year+2)
Climate
Energy
Package
2020
Economic
crisis
Proposal for a
Directive on Energy
Efficiency
Climate Energy
Package 2030
and Market
stability reserveBackloading
debateSurplus
Phase 1
EUAs
cannot be
used in
Phase 2
Brexit
Source: Climate Economics Chair from Bluenext and ICE ECX Futures
11
Three main drivers of the current shortcomings
 An over-estimation of the baseline emissions
– Uncertainty over the economic environment and technical change
– A frequent situation (Ex : Rggi, Chinese pilots, Korea, …)
– A major problem of asymmetric information !
 The uncontrolled entry of Kyoto certificates (2009-2012)
– An increasing gap between the “official cap” and the actual cap
– A general issue: does market linkage reduce ambition?
 A lack of coordination with other policy tools
– Most of the EU abatement results from other policies
– An overlap of instruments: a frequent situation (Cal., SO2,…)
– A major issue of governance, especially in a 28 member states EU
12
The challenges of the reform
 Providing:
– More simplicity
– Less rigidity
– More predictability
 Curing the illness, not the symptoms :
- How to face uncertainty over the baseline ?
- Coordination with the rest of the world
- Coordination with other policy instruments
Combining Price and Quantity-based
Management
– Limits of the current reform
– Restoring the carbon price signal through a price-corridor
– Political feasibility ?
– Medium term possible co-benefits
14
Limits of the current reform
 The « Reform » under discussion:
– Introduction of a Market Stability Reserve (MSR)
– With a bias towards a “pure” quantity-based management:
• No explicit carbon price targets or price triggers ;
• The “Surplus” as a threshold triggering quota withdrawal ;
• An “automatic” adjustment of the cap.
 The ZEPHYR model simulations : risks of more instability
 Can a pure quantity-based management be implemented?
– Short term: action thresholds should be carbon prices
– Medium and long term: A quantity-based management requires
a new governance with the equivalent of a “Carbon Central
Bank”.
15
Restoring the carbon price signal through a price-corridor
 Substituting the “quantity” corridor by a “price” corridor
– Already existing and working (Cal, Rggi, …)
– Technically easy to implement
– Between the thresholds: a quantity-based mechanism
– At the threshold: a price-based mechanism
 What would happen with a price floor at 30 €/tCO2?
– A quasi-tax mechanism (price at the floor) that could last
– Limited adverse effects of an overlap with other policies
– EU-ETS could be compared to other schemes sending an actual
carbon price reference
16
Carbon pricing worldwide, in 2016
Source : World Bank, Carbon Pricing State and Trends
17
Political feasibility?
 Transforming C&T into a quasi-tax scheme involves costs:
– Legal risk
– Huge distribution effects between countries
– Impacts on the cost of energy
– Possible international carbon leakage for covered sectors?
 A major issue: the level of the price-corridor
– Using the social cost of carbon?
– Empirical cost-efficiency approach?
– No perfect formula and the need for pedagogy and specific
governance
18
Social cost of carbon (Computed by US Government Agencies)
19
Coal-to-gas switching price zone (2008-2017)
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
€/tCO2
Siwtching price zone CO2 Allowance price
Carbon price
Source: Climate Economics Chair from ICE data
20
Possible medium term co-benefits
 1990: first attempt to price carbon through taxes
 Since 2005, three situations coexist for EU CO2 emissions:
– Energy & Industry: EU ETS (~50 %)
– Other sectors: domestic carbon taxes (~20%)
– Other sectors: no cost associated to emissions (~30%)
 A robust carbon price corridor could help moving towards a more
unified system
Références
 Bennear, L.S., Stavins, R.N. (2007). Second-best theory and the use of multiple policy
instruments. Environmental and Resource Economics 37, 111-129.
 De Perthuis, C., Trotignon R. (2014). Governance of CO2 markets: Lessons from the EU
ETS, Energy Policy, 75, 100-106.
 De Perthuis, C., Solier, B., Trotignon R. (2016). How should the EU ETS be reformed
following the Paris agreement and Brexit?, Climate Economics Chair Policy Brief, July
2016.
 Goulder, L.H. (2013). Markets for tradable pollution allowances: what are the (new)
lessons ? Journal of Economic Perspectives 27 (1), 87-102.
 Murray, B.C., Newell, R.G., Pizer, W.A. (2008). Balancing Cost and Emissions Certainty: An
Allowance Reserve for Cap-and-Trade, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy
3(1), 84-103, Winter.
 Pizer, W.A. (2002). Combining price and quantity controls to mitigate global climate
change. Journal of Public Economics 85, 409–434.
 Solier, B., R. Trotignon (2016). The impacts of introducing a CO2 floor price in the
electricity sector. Climate Economics Chair, Informations et Débats, June 2016.
21
Thank you for your attention
For more information,
please visit the Climate Economics Chair website:
http://www.chaireeconomieduclimat.org

More Related Content

PDF
Climate change mitigation in Latin America: requirements for the energy secto...
PDF
Energy efficiency and renewable energy modelling with ETSAP TIAM - challenges...
PDF
FORUM PORTUGAL ENERGY POWER: Renewable Energy in Europe – until and beyond 20...
PDF
Paris conf v1-sg
PPTX
Evaluating Carbon Policies
PDF
Mapping Carbon Pricing Initiatives
PDF
Global panorama-carbon-prices-2017 final-5p-2
PPTX
Public Policy to Mitigate Climate Change: Europe’s Experience with Cap-and-Trade
Climate change mitigation in Latin America: requirements for the energy secto...
Energy efficiency and renewable energy modelling with ETSAP TIAM - challenges...
FORUM PORTUGAL ENERGY POWER: Renewable Energy in Europe – until and beyond 20...
Paris conf v1-sg
Evaluating Carbon Policies
Mapping Carbon Pricing Initiatives
Global panorama-carbon-prices-2017 final-5p-2
Public Policy to Mitigate Climate Change: Europe’s Experience with Cap-and-Trade

Similar to Drawing lessons from the unwieldy reforms of EU-ETS: Combining price and quantity management (20)

PPTX
Yvon Slingenberg, Head of Unit B1- Implementation of ETS, DG CLIMA, European ...
PPTX
Europe carbon-emissions-trading
PPT
Emissions Trading - More Detail
PPT
Emissions Trading Media Briefing February 2009
PPT
Emissions trading: The politics of design
PPT
Policies And Technologies
PDF
Climate Policy After Copenhagen The Role Of Carbon Pricing 1st Edition Karste...
PPTX
Alex Wood: CBSR Carbon Pricing & Climate Policy
PDF
Efficiency losses from overlapping regulation of eu carbon emissions
PPTX
OECD Green Talks Webinar: Carbon Pricing Trends - Measuring the Momentum
PPTX
Brigitte knopf 2014 11-13 helsinki-ets
PDF
ETS implementation - Kieran McNamara, IEA
PPT
Free Allocation and the Risk of Carbon Leakage in the EU ETS
PDF
Optimal allocation of the EU carbon budget
PPTX
Px ets karsten neuhoff slides
PDF
84th ICREA colloquium 'Carbon pricing and energy use pathways for staying wit...
PDF
7th Strategic Dialogue of the CMP - Sofie Errendal, OECD
PDF
ETS Handbook
PDF
The EU ETS and global level playing field: the carbon leakage list
PDF
Climate_Economics_in_Progress_2013.compressed
Yvon Slingenberg, Head of Unit B1- Implementation of ETS, DG CLIMA, European ...
Europe carbon-emissions-trading
Emissions Trading - More Detail
Emissions Trading Media Briefing February 2009
Emissions trading: The politics of design
Policies And Technologies
Climate Policy After Copenhagen The Role Of Carbon Pricing 1st Edition Karste...
Alex Wood: CBSR Carbon Pricing & Climate Policy
Efficiency losses from overlapping regulation of eu carbon emissions
OECD Green Talks Webinar: Carbon Pricing Trends - Measuring the Momentum
Brigitte knopf 2014 11-13 helsinki-ets
ETS implementation - Kieran McNamara, IEA
Free Allocation and the Risk of Carbon Leakage in the EU ETS
Optimal allocation of the EU carbon budget
Px ets karsten neuhoff slides
84th ICREA colloquium 'Carbon pricing and energy use pathways for staying wit...
7th Strategic Dialogue of the CMP - Sofie Errendal, OECD
ETS Handbook
The EU ETS and global level playing field: the carbon leakage list
Climate_Economics_in_Progress_2013.compressed
Ad

More from Florence Shool of Regulation (20)

PDF
Training at the florence school of regulation
PDF
Distribution Unbundling
PDF
How to design LNG contracts
PPT
The Emerging Governance for the Energy Union: A new role for the Agency
PDF
Russia Ukraine Energy Disputes
PDF
Towards a Pan-European Security of Supply Regime
PDF
A new role for the Agency
PDF
Renewable Energy Policy: What comes after Feed-in Tariffs?
PDF
An electricity market design at last?
PDF
State aid enforcement in the energy sector in South Eastern Europe
PDF
The experience with market liberalisation in the CEE region
PDF
Pipelines: Between economics, law and diplomacy
PDF
Transmission Unbundling
PDF
Energy Dispute Resolution: Is Arbitration Outdated?
PDF
Current arbitration cases under the Energy Charter Treaty
PDF
Designing Network Codes
PDF
Legal challenges in establishing organised electricity markets and market cou...
PDF
Energy Efficiency: How efficient is the current regulatory framework?
PDF
Challenges for the European Gas Market
PDF
Security and Contracts: Energy Policy and Resource Policy
Training at the florence school of regulation
Distribution Unbundling
How to design LNG contracts
The Emerging Governance for the Energy Union: A new role for the Agency
Russia Ukraine Energy Disputes
Towards a Pan-European Security of Supply Regime
A new role for the Agency
Renewable Energy Policy: What comes after Feed-in Tariffs?
An electricity market design at last?
State aid enforcement in the energy sector in South Eastern Europe
The experience with market liberalisation in the CEE region
Pipelines: Between economics, law and diplomacy
Transmission Unbundling
Energy Dispute Resolution: Is Arbitration Outdated?
Current arbitration cases under the Energy Charter Treaty
Designing Network Codes
Legal challenges in establishing organised electricity markets and market cou...
Energy Efficiency: How efficient is the current regulatory framework?
Challenges for the European Gas Market
Security and Contracts: Energy Policy and Resource Policy
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
THE EFFECT OF FOREIGN AID ON ECONOMIC GROWTH IN ETHIOPIA
PDF
Buy Verified Stripe Accounts for Sale - Secure and.pdf
PDF
NAPF_RESPONSE_TO_THE_PENSIONS_COMMISSION_8 _2_.pdf
PPT
E commerce busin and some important issues
PDF
Mathematical Economics 23lec03slides.pdf
PDF
Bitcoin Layer August 2025: Power Laws of Bitcoin: The Core and Bubbles
PDF
Chapter 9 IFRS Ed-Ed4_2020 Intermediate Accounting
PDF
caregiving tools.pdf...........................
PPT
KPMG FA Benefits Report_FINAL_Jan 27_2010.ppt
PDF
5a An Age-Based, Three-Dimensional Distribution Model Incorporating Sequence ...
PDF
CLIMATE CHANGE AS A THREAT MULTIPLIER: ASSESSING ITS IMPACT ON RESOURCE SCARC...
PPTX
Session 14-16. Capital Structure Theories.pptx
PPTX
Session 3. Time Value of Money.pptx_finance
PPTX
4.5.1 Financial Governance_Appropriation & Finance.pptx
PDF
6a Transition Through Old Age in a Dynamic Retirement Distribution Model JFP ...
PDF
Dialnet-DynamicHedgingOfPricesOfNaturalGasInMexico-8788871.pdf
PPTX
Introduction to Managemeng Chapter 1..pptx
PPTX
kyc aml guideline a detailed pt onthat.pptx
PPTX
How best to drive Metrics, Ratios, and Key Performance Indicators
PPTX
OAT_ORI_Fed Independence_August 2025.pptx
THE EFFECT OF FOREIGN AID ON ECONOMIC GROWTH IN ETHIOPIA
Buy Verified Stripe Accounts for Sale - Secure and.pdf
NAPF_RESPONSE_TO_THE_PENSIONS_COMMISSION_8 _2_.pdf
E commerce busin and some important issues
Mathematical Economics 23lec03slides.pdf
Bitcoin Layer August 2025: Power Laws of Bitcoin: The Core and Bubbles
Chapter 9 IFRS Ed-Ed4_2020 Intermediate Accounting
caregiving tools.pdf...........................
KPMG FA Benefits Report_FINAL_Jan 27_2010.ppt
5a An Age-Based, Three-Dimensional Distribution Model Incorporating Sequence ...
CLIMATE CHANGE AS A THREAT MULTIPLIER: ASSESSING ITS IMPACT ON RESOURCE SCARC...
Session 14-16. Capital Structure Theories.pptx
Session 3. Time Value of Money.pptx_finance
4.5.1 Financial Governance_Appropriation & Finance.pptx
6a Transition Through Old Age in a Dynamic Retirement Distribution Model JFP ...
Dialnet-DynamicHedgingOfPricesOfNaturalGasInMexico-8788871.pdf
Introduction to Managemeng Chapter 1..pptx
kyc aml guideline a detailed pt onthat.pptx
How best to drive Metrics, Ratios, and Key Performance Indicators
OAT_ORI_Fed Independence_August 2025.pptx

Drawing lessons from the unwieldy reforms of EU-ETS: Combining price and quantity management

  • 1. Drawing lessons from the unwieldy reforms of EU-ETS: Combining price and quantity management Christian de Perthuis Professor at Paris-Dauphine University European University Institute Florence School of Regulation - Climate, Tuesday 9 May 2017
  • 2. 2 Outline  Do we need a carbon price signal ? – Short term: A comparison between the UK and Germany – Long term: “Carbon rent” versus Oil rent  Lessons from past experience – A brief history of EU-ETS – The three main drivers of EU-ETS shortcomings – Challenges of the reform  Combining Price and Quantity-based Management – Limits of the current reform – Restoring the carbon price signal through a price-corridor – Political feasibility ? – Medium term possible co-benefits
  • 3. Do we need a carbon price signal ? – Short term: A comparison between the UK and Germany – Long term: “Carbon rent” versus Oil rent
  • 4. 4 EU ETS emissions since 2005 : Germany vs. UK 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 ETSemissions(aviationexcl.)-Base100=2005 Germany UK Impact of UK carbon price floor (introduced in 2013) Source: Climate Economics Chair, EUTL data
  • 5. 5 The economics of oil rent Oil price ($/bbl) investments 20 200 Conventional Deposits Offshore & Oil Shales Extreme Conditions (Ex : Arctic) Source : Climate Economics Chair
  • 6. 6 The economics of « Carbon Rent » Carbon price (€/tCO2) investments 20 200 Coal phase-out Oil phase-out Natural gas pase-out Possible impacts of CCS ? Conventional Unconventional Source : Climate Economics Chair
  • 7. Lessons from past experience – A brief history of EU-ETS – The three main drivers of the EU-ETS shortcomings – Challenges of the reform
  • 8. 8 A brief history of EU-ETS Source: Climate Economics Chair ? (UK?)
  • 9. 9 A brief history of EU-ETS : three main results  More Complexity – Ex: Rules for free allocations – Ex: Rules for the use of auction revenues – Ex: Rules for the projected « stability reserve » – Complexity is costly!  Less flexibility – Impossibility of adjusting the cap within a phase – A major governance issue: How to manage unexpected shocks?  Less predictability – Ex : Uncertainty on the cap – Ex : how to anticipate future carbon prices?
  • 10. 10 What is your carbon price anticipation ? 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Jan-14 Jan-15 Jan-16 Jan-17 €/tCO2 EUA Phase 1 (Spot) EUA Phase 2 et 3 (Futures Dec. Year+2) Climate Energy Package 2020 Economic crisis Proposal for a Directive on Energy Efficiency Climate Energy Package 2030 and Market stability reserveBackloading debateSurplus Phase 1 EUAs cannot be used in Phase 2 Brexit Source: Climate Economics Chair from Bluenext and ICE ECX Futures
  • 11. 11 Three main drivers of the current shortcomings  An over-estimation of the baseline emissions – Uncertainty over the economic environment and technical change – A frequent situation (Ex : Rggi, Chinese pilots, Korea, …) – A major problem of asymmetric information !  The uncontrolled entry of Kyoto certificates (2009-2012) – An increasing gap between the “official cap” and the actual cap – A general issue: does market linkage reduce ambition?  A lack of coordination with other policy tools – Most of the EU abatement results from other policies – An overlap of instruments: a frequent situation (Cal., SO2,…) – A major issue of governance, especially in a 28 member states EU
  • 12. 12 The challenges of the reform  Providing: – More simplicity – Less rigidity – More predictability  Curing the illness, not the symptoms : - How to face uncertainty over the baseline ? - Coordination with the rest of the world - Coordination with other policy instruments
  • 13. Combining Price and Quantity-based Management – Limits of the current reform – Restoring the carbon price signal through a price-corridor – Political feasibility ? – Medium term possible co-benefits
  • 14. 14 Limits of the current reform  The « Reform » under discussion: – Introduction of a Market Stability Reserve (MSR) – With a bias towards a “pure” quantity-based management: • No explicit carbon price targets or price triggers ; • The “Surplus” as a threshold triggering quota withdrawal ; • An “automatic” adjustment of the cap.  The ZEPHYR model simulations : risks of more instability  Can a pure quantity-based management be implemented? – Short term: action thresholds should be carbon prices – Medium and long term: A quantity-based management requires a new governance with the equivalent of a “Carbon Central Bank”.
  • 15. 15 Restoring the carbon price signal through a price-corridor  Substituting the “quantity” corridor by a “price” corridor – Already existing and working (Cal, Rggi, …) – Technically easy to implement – Between the thresholds: a quantity-based mechanism – At the threshold: a price-based mechanism  What would happen with a price floor at 30 €/tCO2? – A quasi-tax mechanism (price at the floor) that could last – Limited adverse effects of an overlap with other policies – EU-ETS could be compared to other schemes sending an actual carbon price reference
  • 16. 16 Carbon pricing worldwide, in 2016 Source : World Bank, Carbon Pricing State and Trends
  • 17. 17 Political feasibility?  Transforming C&T into a quasi-tax scheme involves costs: – Legal risk – Huge distribution effects between countries – Impacts on the cost of energy – Possible international carbon leakage for covered sectors?  A major issue: the level of the price-corridor – Using the social cost of carbon? – Empirical cost-efficiency approach? – No perfect formula and the need for pedagogy and specific governance
  • 18. 18 Social cost of carbon (Computed by US Government Agencies)
  • 19. 19 Coal-to-gas switching price zone (2008-2017) -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 €/tCO2 Siwtching price zone CO2 Allowance price Carbon price Source: Climate Economics Chair from ICE data
  • 20. 20 Possible medium term co-benefits  1990: first attempt to price carbon through taxes  Since 2005, three situations coexist for EU CO2 emissions: – Energy & Industry: EU ETS (~50 %) – Other sectors: domestic carbon taxes (~20%) – Other sectors: no cost associated to emissions (~30%)  A robust carbon price corridor could help moving towards a more unified system
  • 21. Références  Bennear, L.S., Stavins, R.N. (2007). Second-best theory and the use of multiple policy instruments. Environmental and Resource Economics 37, 111-129.  De Perthuis, C., Trotignon R. (2014). Governance of CO2 markets: Lessons from the EU ETS, Energy Policy, 75, 100-106.  De Perthuis, C., Solier, B., Trotignon R. (2016). How should the EU ETS be reformed following the Paris agreement and Brexit?, Climate Economics Chair Policy Brief, July 2016.  Goulder, L.H. (2013). Markets for tradable pollution allowances: what are the (new) lessons ? Journal of Economic Perspectives 27 (1), 87-102.  Murray, B.C., Newell, R.G., Pizer, W.A. (2008). Balancing Cost and Emissions Certainty: An Allowance Reserve for Cap-and-Trade, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 3(1), 84-103, Winter.  Pizer, W.A. (2002). Combining price and quantity controls to mitigate global climate change. Journal of Public Economics 85, 409–434.  Solier, B., R. Trotignon (2016). The impacts of introducing a CO2 floor price in the electricity sector. Climate Economics Chair, Informations et Débats, June 2016. 21
  • 22. Thank you for your attention For more information, please visit the Climate Economics Chair website: http://www.chaireeconomieduclimat.org