Building a humanitarian information system: the Experience of the Dynamic COMPAS Olivier Sarrat, Information System Engineer, Groupe URD Proceedings of the 6th International ISCRAM Conference – Gothenburg, Sweden, May 2009 J. Landgren and S. Jul, eds.  The humanitarian sector began to look at the issue of Quality in the mid-nineties. The Quality COMPAS framework was developed in 2004 to provide humanitarian actors with a Quality assurance method, which could be adapted for use in any intervention context. In 2006, the first version of the Dynamic COMPAS free software was released. Its core idea was to provide both a dynamic implementation of the Quality COMPAS and a knowledge management tool to build and share the institutional memory of an organization. For two years, the development of this Humanitarian Information Management System has continuously moved in three parallel directions: * the software has become increasingly adaptable to the requirements of each specific organisation * the content of the software has grown to encompass more and more "down-to-earth" project management features such as report generation, indicator follow-up or field-headquarters communication * the software development process has become increasingly collaborative: a free software model is being implemented and a needs assessment for new software aimed at headquarters is just finished.
Olivier Sarrat, Groupe URD Building a humanitarian information system:  the experience of the Dynamic COMPAS
Historical background The Dynamic COMPAS project Evaluation and Lessons Future developments Contents
The mission of the Groupe URD : “ IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF HUMANITARIAN PRACTICES THROUGH DEBATE, EVALUATION, OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, CAPITALIZATION, TRAINING, ADVOCACY” Created in 1993. Headquarters: South of France Offices: Paris Abéché (Chad) www.urd.org 1. Historical background
Sharing our findings    Publishing the results of our work (books, reviews, Internet)    Facilitating the exchange of lessons and experiences through debates and conferences (Autumn School on Humanitarian Aid) Learning from previous experiences    Carrying out evaluations on programme design and implementation     Conducting cross-sector and thematic research studies Advocacy on humanitarian practice    Advising and influencing donors, decision makers, NGOs and UN agencies Capacity development    Providing training for aid workers based on lessons learnt in the field Developing new methods and tools    Quality COMPAS© (CD-ROM and Companion Book)    Dynamic COMPAS® (software)    Practitioners’ Handbook on Participation AFFECTED POPULATIONS & CONTEXT
1996: Joint Evaluation of Emergency Assistance to Rwanda 1997: Launch of the SPHERE project 1999: Launch of the “Projet Qualité”, by Groupe URD 2004: Release of the Quality COMPAS method, result of the “Projet Qualité” 2006: Release of the first version of the Dynamic COMPAS 2009: Release of version 1.4.2 of the Dynamic COMPAS, which has been downloaded by more than 1500 people from more than 90 different countries since 2006. 1. Historical background
What is the Dynamic COMPAS? 2. The Dynamic COMPAS project
2. The Dynamic COMPAS project
2. The Dynamic COMPAS project
2. The Dynamic COMPAS project
Quality management  software which systematically handles all the critical points of a project and  builds the institutional memory of an organization ;  Project management  software which helps the decision-making process. 2. The Dynamic COMPAS project
Challenges: software designed by and  specifically developed for humanitarian actors  ; software released in  3 languages  with a full set of manuals, online support and training which is  freely available  to any organisation regardless of its size.  (support from public funds - notably ECHO) 2. The Dynamic COMPAS project
What have we learned from the Dynamic COMPAS experience? 3. Evaluation and Lessons
Sources of information used to monitor the project: Users must register before downloading (it has been downloaded by 1500 people) 17 user feedback articles since September 2007 in the quarterly newsletter “Aiming for Quality” Oral feedback from users during training sessions (250 people trained so far) Research into the possibility of developing open source software involving online surveys, interviews and a literature review   3. Evaluation and Lessons
Positive points: A wide range of users ( 1500 people from 90 countries, 250 people trained) Positive feedback on features which match users’ needs Free and easily available Groupe URD has established a reputation as an organization which is able to develop software 3. Evaluation and Lessons
Remaining challenges: Making the necessary changes so that the software is adopted more widely at an organisational level   Guaranteeing that technical support is provided and the software continues to evolve in the future   Finding a solution to the time constraints of public funding   3. Evaluation and Lessons
So, we need to… Get closer to the specific characteristics of different users Respect users’ priorities Make the software ‘Open source’ so that it remains free and continues to evolve in the long term (example of Sahana) 3. Evaluation and Lessons
What’s next? 4. Future developments
Demand from NGOs for a new version / new software: Software with tools to manage and monitor all an organisation’s projects.   Free software and its development community.   A set of training modules, including training of trainers to disseminate the software more broadly.   4. Future developments
Questions?  Comments? Contributions? More information and software available at: www.qualitycompas.org Thank you !

More Related Content

PPTX
Better Software, Better Practices, Better Research
PDF
Presentation booster aap nantes
PDF
Slide etude datos.gob.es
PPTX
Colormixing and Matching
PPT
Outcome-based evaluation of research networks supported by IDRC's Acacia prog...
PDF
Introducing agile to ERP development - EUNIS 2018 - Abstract
PDF
LINKING SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PHASE AND PRODUCT ATTRIBUTES WITH USER EVALUATIO...
PPSX
Overview Sphere M&E system
Better Software, Better Practices, Better Research
Presentation booster aap nantes
Slide etude datos.gob.es
Colormixing and Matching
Outcome-based evaluation of research networks supported by IDRC's Acacia prog...
Introducing agile to ERP development - EUNIS 2018 - Abstract
LINKING SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PHASE AND PRODUCT ATTRIBUTES WITH USER EVALUATIO...
Overview Sphere M&E system

Similar to Dynamic COMPAS at ISCRAM 2009 (20)

PPTX
Agile Practices and Design Thinking.pptx
PPT
Considerations for AAS CRP Impact Evaluation - Workshop on Strengthening Imp...
PPT
16 si(systems analysis and design )
PPT
Project monitoring and evaluation by Samuel Obino Mokaya
PPT
Heartbeat: Measuring Active User Base and Potential User Interest
PPTX
#ISSS2015 Berlin - Gilbert et al - Understanding Systems Engineering Project ...
PPT
Agile And Open Development
PDF
Analysing the evolution of social aspects of open source software ecosystems
PDF
Open source caqdas what is in the box and what is missing
PDF
LINKING SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PHASE AND PRODUCT ATTRIBUTES WITH USER EVALUATIO...
PDF
The Development of Open Source E-Learning Environments: the Chamilo Experience
PDF
Strategies and Policies for the implementation of Free & and Open Source Soft...
PPT
Overview Agile Methods
PDF
Floss Metrics 2009
PDF
Apt agile methodology
PDF
Why FLOSS is a Java developer's best friend: Dave Gruber
PPT
Replicating FLOSS Research as eResearch
DOCX
DRF Monitoring and Evaluation Design Guide (1)
PDF
Results of the FLOSSMetrics project
PDF
DIN: Danish Design-driven Innovation
Agile Practices and Design Thinking.pptx
Considerations for AAS CRP Impact Evaluation - Workshop on Strengthening Imp...
16 si(systems analysis and design )
Project monitoring and evaluation by Samuel Obino Mokaya
Heartbeat: Measuring Active User Base and Potential User Interest
#ISSS2015 Berlin - Gilbert et al - Understanding Systems Engineering Project ...
Agile And Open Development
Analysing the evolution of social aspects of open source software ecosystems
Open source caqdas what is in the box and what is missing
LINKING SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PHASE AND PRODUCT ATTRIBUTES WITH USER EVALUATIO...
The Development of Open Source E-Learning Environments: the Chamilo Experience
Strategies and Policies for the implementation of Free & and Open Source Soft...
Overview Agile Methods
Floss Metrics 2009
Apt agile methodology
Why FLOSS is a Java developer's best friend: Dave Gruber
Replicating FLOSS Research as eResearch
DRF Monitoring and Evaluation Design Guide (1)
Results of the FLOSSMetrics project
DIN: Danish Design-driven Innovation
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Hybrid model detection and classification of lung cancer
PDF
Assigned Numbers - 2025 - Bluetooth® Document
PDF
August Patch Tuesday
PDF
Developing a website for English-speaking practice to English as a foreign la...
DOCX
search engine optimization ppt fir known well about this
PDF
Transform Your ITIL® 4 & ITSM Strategy with AI in 2025.pdf
PDF
Getting started with AI Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
PPTX
Final SEM Unit 1 for mit wpu at pune .pptx
PDF
TrustArc Webinar - Click, Consent, Trust: Winning the Privacy Game
PPTX
O2C Customer Invoices to Receipt V15A.pptx
PDF
Microsoft Solutions Partner Drive Digital Transformation with D365.pdf
PPTX
The various Industrial Revolutions .pptx
PDF
Video forgery: An extensive analysis of inter-and intra-frame manipulation al...
PDF
CloudStack 4.21: First Look Webinar slides
PDF
Getting Started with Data Integration: FME Form 101
PDF
1 - Historical Antecedents, Social Consideration.pdf
PDF
A Late Bloomer's Guide to GenAI: Ethics, Bias, and Effective Prompting - Boha...
PPT
Module 1.ppt Iot fundamentals and Architecture
PPTX
observCloud-Native Containerability and monitoring.pptx
PPTX
MicrosoftCybserSecurityReferenceArchitecture-April-2025.pptx
Hybrid model detection and classification of lung cancer
Assigned Numbers - 2025 - Bluetooth® Document
August Patch Tuesday
Developing a website for English-speaking practice to English as a foreign la...
search engine optimization ppt fir known well about this
Transform Your ITIL® 4 & ITSM Strategy with AI in 2025.pdf
Getting started with AI Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Final SEM Unit 1 for mit wpu at pune .pptx
TrustArc Webinar - Click, Consent, Trust: Winning the Privacy Game
O2C Customer Invoices to Receipt V15A.pptx
Microsoft Solutions Partner Drive Digital Transformation with D365.pdf
The various Industrial Revolutions .pptx
Video forgery: An extensive analysis of inter-and intra-frame manipulation al...
CloudStack 4.21: First Look Webinar slides
Getting Started with Data Integration: FME Form 101
1 - Historical Antecedents, Social Consideration.pdf
A Late Bloomer's Guide to GenAI: Ethics, Bias, and Effective Prompting - Boha...
Module 1.ppt Iot fundamentals and Architecture
observCloud-Native Containerability and monitoring.pptx
MicrosoftCybserSecurityReferenceArchitecture-April-2025.pptx
Ad

Dynamic COMPAS at ISCRAM 2009

  • 1. Building a humanitarian information system: the Experience of the Dynamic COMPAS Olivier Sarrat, Information System Engineer, Groupe URD Proceedings of the 6th International ISCRAM Conference – Gothenburg, Sweden, May 2009 J. Landgren and S. Jul, eds. The humanitarian sector began to look at the issue of Quality in the mid-nineties. The Quality COMPAS framework was developed in 2004 to provide humanitarian actors with a Quality assurance method, which could be adapted for use in any intervention context. In 2006, the first version of the Dynamic COMPAS free software was released. Its core idea was to provide both a dynamic implementation of the Quality COMPAS and a knowledge management tool to build and share the institutional memory of an organization. For two years, the development of this Humanitarian Information Management System has continuously moved in three parallel directions: * the software has become increasingly adaptable to the requirements of each specific organisation * the content of the software has grown to encompass more and more "down-to-earth" project management features such as report generation, indicator follow-up or field-headquarters communication * the software development process has become increasingly collaborative: a free software model is being implemented and a needs assessment for new software aimed at headquarters is just finished.
  • 2. Olivier Sarrat, Groupe URD Building a humanitarian information system: the experience of the Dynamic COMPAS
  • 3. Historical background The Dynamic COMPAS project Evaluation and Lessons Future developments Contents
  • 4. The mission of the Groupe URD : “ IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF HUMANITARIAN PRACTICES THROUGH DEBATE, EVALUATION, OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, CAPITALIZATION, TRAINING, ADVOCACY” Created in 1993. Headquarters: South of France Offices: Paris Abéché (Chad) www.urd.org 1. Historical background
  • 5. Sharing our findings  Publishing the results of our work (books, reviews, Internet)  Facilitating the exchange of lessons and experiences through debates and conferences (Autumn School on Humanitarian Aid) Learning from previous experiences  Carrying out evaluations on programme design and implementation  Conducting cross-sector and thematic research studies Advocacy on humanitarian practice  Advising and influencing donors, decision makers, NGOs and UN agencies Capacity development  Providing training for aid workers based on lessons learnt in the field Developing new methods and tools  Quality COMPAS© (CD-ROM and Companion Book)  Dynamic COMPAS® (software)  Practitioners’ Handbook on Participation AFFECTED POPULATIONS & CONTEXT
  • 6. 1996: Joint Evaluation of Emergency Assistance to Rwanda 1997: Launch of the SPHERE project 1999: Launch of the “Projet Qualité”, by Groupe URD 2004: Release of the Quality COMPAS method, result of the “Projet Qualité” 2006: Release of the first version of the Dynamic COMPAS 2009: Release of version 1.4.2 of the Dynamic COMPAS, which has been downloaded by more than 1500 people from more than 90 different countries since 2006. 1. Historical background
  • 7. What is the Dynamic COMPAS? 2. The Dynamic COMPAS project
  • 8. 2. The Dynamic COMPAS project
  • 9. 2. The Dynamic COMPAS project
  • 10. 2. The Dynamic COMPAS project
  • 11. Quality management software which systematically handles all the critical points of a project and builds the institutional memory of an organization ; Project management software which helps the decision-making process. 2. The Dynamic COMPAS project
  • 12. Challenges: software designed by and specifically developed for humanitarian actors ; software released in 3 languages with a full set of manuals, online support and training which is freely available to any organisation regardless of its size. (support from public funds - notably ECHO) 2. The Dynamic COMPAS project
  • 13. What have we learned from the Dynamic COMPAS experience? 3. Evaluation and Lessons
  • 14. Sources of information used to monitor the project: Users must register before downloading (it has been downloaded by 1500 people) 17 user feedback articles since September 2007 in the quarterly newsletter “Aiming for Quality” Oral feedback from users during training sessions (250 people trained so far) Research into the possibility of developing open source software involving online surveys, interviews and a literature review 3. Evaluation and Lessons
  • 15. Positive points: A wide range of users ( 1500 people from 90 countries, 250 people trained) Positive feedback on features which match users’ needs Free and easily available Groupe URD has established a reputation as an organization which is able to develop software 3. Evaluation and Lessons
  • 16. Remaining challenges: Making the necessary changes so that the software is adopted more widely at an organisational level Guaranteeing that technical support is provided and the software continues to evolve in the future Finding a solution to the time constraints of public funding 3. Evaluation and Lessons
  • 17. So, we need to… Get closer to the specific characteristics of different users Respect users’ priorities Make the software ‘Open source’ so that it remains free and continues to evolve in the long term (example of Sahana) 3. Evaluation and Lessons
  • 18. What’s next? 4. Future developments
  • 19. Demand from NGOs for a new version / new software: Software with tools to manage and monitor all an organisation’s projects. Free software and its development community. A set of training modules, including training of trainers to disseminate the software more broadly. 4. Future developments
  • 20. Questions? Comments? Contributions? More information and software available at: www.qualitycompas.org Thank you !