Journal Apps : a comparison of 4 Journal Apps specifically designed for personalized reading (medical) scientific literature
Download as PPTX, PDF3 likes2,323 views
The document compares various journal apps designed for personalized reading of medical literature, highlighting key features such as user interface, registration process, and access to full texts. It outlines the evolution of these apps with notes on team sizes and features like Android support and PDF annotation. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of visibility in collections for users and the need for improved user interfaces and search functionalities.
Journal Apps : a comparison of 4 Journal Apps specifically designed for personalized reading (medical) scientific literature
- 1. Journal Apps Comparison of designed for personalized reading (medical) scientific literatur
- 2. BrowZine Docwise Read by QXMD Docphin
- 10. September 2011, teamsize: 12 Key features: TOCs, Bookshelves, integration bibliographic software Next feature: smartphone app Tablet: iPad, Android SmartPhone: - Web: -
- 11. December 2012, teamsize: 3 Key features: flipboard-like personalized updates, Search & Topic Alerts, Add any RSS. Next feature: ? Tablet: iPad SmartPhone: iPhone Web: - Android: -
- 12. November 2012, teamsize: 3 Key features: Flipboard-like view, pdf annotation, web-version Next feature: Android support? Tablet: iPad SmartPhone: iPhone Web: + Android: -
- 13. July 2012, teamsize: 4 Key features: Medstream, Landmark articles Next feature: ? Tablet: iPad, Android SmartPhone: iPhone, Android Web: +
- 14. CEC3 Workshop EAHIL 2014 Criteria for comparison • Registration process • User Interface • Performance • Access to full text • PDF view + extra's • Share options • "Open In" other Apps • Notifications • Search Options • Support
- 15. Peak demo
- 16. Discover access issues very quickly be abled to act faster
- 17. Staff end personal subscriptions. Now they SEE what we have. It means they did not 'see' our collection before
- 18. The visible collection vs How to See What You Are Not Looking At.......
- 19. Very cooperative, fast adding of extra journals, Search topics & News Add/ Edit interface needs work
- 20. User interface, Annotations in pdf Mysterious topic drill down
- 21. Trending articles in Docphin community, The entering of ads
- 22. Browzine Docwise Read Docphin Registration User interface Performance Access full-text Pdf view & extra's Share "Open in" Notifications Search Support Gold BronzeSilver 4th (Subjective rating by course participants mixed with my experiences with the apps)
- 28. http://info.h5.com/Portals/179343/images/shutterstock_24639607.jpg O N E S I Z E D O E S N O T F I T A L L
- 29. Keep up to date
- 30. If you want to be seen as an expert ... ...then your expertise has to be seen Lorcan Dempsey http://www.slideshare.net/lisld/the-inside-out-library
Editor's Notes
- #2: Comparison, early 2013 Institutions registration, free Start ups 3 months Support for all 4
- #3: 4 different apps, a lot of different features Why the focus on these apps? Can they be compared? Struggle with keeping up to date!
- #4: User diversity They are individual persons you are serving with personal tools
- #5: To decide what apps to go for, or to advise a staff member Ask questions Are they looking for topic via search or Tocs
- #6: Want to read online first as they appear? Or just the tocs when they are ready?
- #7: wireless Access to digital library inside organisation And! Off-campus access solution
- #8: Or you want to keep up in a different way
- #11: Small devices Expanded content: Jstore
- #24: Very subjective, absolutely not objective
- #32: Over 11.000 staff, around 4600 researchers that contribute to publishing My library CMB, serves this community, mainly in facilitating medical education, teaching, patient care & research. Team of 6 reonsoble for ... Me: besides being medical information specialist, also coordinator electronic services & innovations Basically: boosting awareness of current staff publications UMCG Resarch Office rsponsible for collecting & analysing. Using their own designed workflow & tools, is publising in rather uninteresting way, pdf, once a year. Huge task which takes them months, and therefore is always too late, behind. 2011 numbers/lists have not yet been published.