Experience similar hands-
on deployment times
for both AMD and Intel
processor-powered systems
Complete common
management tasks using
identical processes
whether the CPU is
from AMD or Intel
Use the same
deployment method
for both AMD and Intel
processor-powered systems
Equal time, equal tools:
Measuring PC deployment time
in multi-vendor environments
Investigating the experience of simultaneously
deploying AMD and Intel processors in a
Microsoft-managed environment
The modern workforce isn’t confined simply to traditional office buildings, with
many industries utilizing remote or hybrid work models that see employees
logging in from different locations. While a mobile workforce has its advantages,
managing a distributed laptop fleet can present new challenges. IT admins need
a straightforward method to deploy new laptops to end users, regardless of their
location. Meanwhile, decision-makers may find the best laptop purchase choices
feature processors from different vendors. This means that admins need to be able
to manage a mixed-CPU fleet with the least fuss possible.
To gauge the complexities of deploying and managing a mixed-CPU fleet, we
deployed two pairs of Dell and HP laptops. Each pair included one AMD and one
Intel processor. Because different teams may use different Microsoft deployment
and management tools, we also utilized both sides of Microsoft Endpoint Manager,
with Configuration Manager as a traditional approach and Windows Autopilot as
a modern approach. To complete the evaluation, we performed several common
management tasks, including system wipes for decommissioning or repurposing.
Our findings will relieve IT administrators managing diverse fleets: there was
no difference in the deployment effort due to the processor. Additionally, the
processes we used to complete common lifecycle management tasks were
identical in both the required hands-on time and the number of steps involved.
While we did discover small deployment time discrepancies between the devices
themselves, this amounted to no more than a few minutes. Continue reading for
more on the impact of our test results.
Equal time, equal tools: Measuring PC deployment time in multi-vendor environments August 2025
A Principled Technologies report: Hands-on testing. Real-world results.
How we tested
Among the many daily tasks IT teams face when managing large device fleets, deploying operating systems
and installing drivers should be among the easiest to perform. A straightforward and repeatable management
method across your entire PC fleet, regardless of processor, allows IT admins to dedicate more of their time to
tackling complex business challenges and unlocking your organization’s full potential.
To understand the overlaps in deployment methods between AMD and Intel processor-powered systems, we
conducted our testing using two pairs of laptops with nearly identical configurations except the processor. We
used two different AMD processors to further demonstrate how processor selection had no impact on an admin’s
effort to manage the laptops in our test scenarios.
Dell systems:
• Dell Pro 14 Plus
with an AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 processor
• Dell Pro 14 Plus
with an Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 268V
HP systems:
• HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI
with an AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 processor
• HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI
with an Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 268V
Our testing consisted of two phases. During the first phase, we determined the required time and effort to
deploy Windows 11 Pro operating systems and install drivers on both the AMD and Intel processor-powered
devices using a traditional approach using:
• Microsoft Configuration Manager
• Microsoft Active Directory
Finally, we connected each laptop to a deployment switch and powered it on, enabling the deployment server
to initiate and deliver the OS installation to the target machine.
We also investigated how deployment works with newer cloud-centric management tools from Microsoft, using:
• Windows Autopilot
• Microsoft Entra ID
• Microsoft Intune, which according to Microsoft is a “cloud-based unified endpoint management solution…
[that] has become a market leader.”1
We reset the devices to factory settings and deployed operating systems, added device IDs to Intune,
configured organizational settings, and performed user logins on each device.
Consistent evaluation with a multi-year perspective
On top of initiating upgrades across your entire PC fleet, you
occasionally need to buy fresh laptops for new hires and replace
faulty devices. We’ve explored deployment in fleets with
heterogeneous processors in reports dating back to 2018. Then,
we evaluated the image deployment process on Windows 10 on
similarly configured AMD and Intel processor-powered devices.
We repeated our testing in 2021 and again in 2023, with the
2023 study including an approach using Windows Autopilot.
In each of these studies, our results confirmed that IT admins
could use an identical deployment method for a Microsoft
Windows 10 (or Windows 10 Pro) image with both AMD and Intel
processor-based devices. In addition, in 2023, using Windows
Autopilot with the AMD processor-powered laptops produced an
even speedier deployment process.
For more details, read our 2018 report,
our 2021 report, or our 2023 report.
Equal time, equal tools: Measuring PC deployment time in multi-vendor environments August 2025 | 2
Deploy laptops with equal effort and comparable time, regardless
of processor, using traditional Configuration Manager
OS deployment
As your organization grows, so does the value in purchasing devices that deliver the best performance for your
increasingly specific business needs. If that includes shifting to a mixed-CPU environment, for example to explore
possible processing efficiencies for specialized workloads, you’ll want to ensure this won’t also introduce new
hassles in managing these devices.
Our test results show there’s no need to fret. When testing with Configuration Manager, OS deployment required
the same number of steps irrespective of processor for all four laptops (see Figure 1). Both the Dell laptops and
the HP laptops required 30 total steps: 27 prerequisite steps as a one-time cost for the Windows version and
drivers we used for testing, and then just 3 additional steps to complete the deployment through Configuration
Manager. The processor vendor had no effect on deployment steps.
The required OS deployment time was also nearly identical among each pair of systems. The difference in
required deployment time for the Dell devices was within 5 percent, with the AMD processor-based system
slightly slower. The difference between HP laptops was within 2 percent, this time with the AMD processor-
powered device taking less time. When we excluded the time the devices were processing on their own and
focus just on our admin’s hands-on time, the difference between the Dell devices was just 3 seconds, or less
than a 3 percent difference. The difference between the HP devices grew to just over 9 percent; however,
this represented a difference of only 14 seconds. Altogether, our results show how little of a difference the
processor made.
Time (h:mm:ss)
Deploying one laptop using Configuration Manager
0:00:00
1:00:00
2:00:00
1:30:00
0:30:00
Dell Pro 14 Plus with
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO
350 processor
Dell Pro 14 Plus with Intel
Core Ultra 7 processor
268V
1:39:27
Dell HP
We
followed
the same
30 steps
1:42:18
1:44:05
HP EliteBook X G1a 14
AI with AMD Ryzen AI 9
HX PRO 375 processor
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI
with Intel Core Ultra 7
processor 268V
1:44:09 1:46:14
We
followed
the same
30 steps
1:41:48 1:43:39
1:37:43
1:39:27
Hands-on System
Hands-on System Hands-on System
Hands-on System
00:01:47 00:01:44 00:02:21 00:02:35
Figure 1: Total time (hh:mm:ss) to deploy one laptop using Configuration Manager. Hands-on time is how long it took us to start the
installation process on the target PC, and system time is how long it took our task sequence to install the OS and applications and
configure the system. Source: PT.
Equal time, equal tools: Measuring PC deployment time in multi-vendor environments August 2025 | 3
Installing drivers
Preparing new devices for end-users typically involves IT installing company-approved drivers and applications
after OS deployment. To understand how this process compares across different laptops, we measured the
required time and effort to add driver packages to each system. We uploaded the packages to Configuration
Manager prior to deploying the OS images, allowing its automated sequence to handle all OS updates and
customizations on the devices.
For all four laptops, installing drivers took the same 27 steps, confirming the process was identical regardless of
processor or manufacturer. On top of that, the required time to complete driver installation was identical within
each pair of laptops. This indicates that IT admins can anticipate a consistent process in both effort and time for
not only OS deployment, but driver installation as well.
HP
Dell
Adding drivers to the boot image and driver package
1:15
1:15
2:00
3:00
1:00
0:00
We
followed
the same
27 steps
We
followed
the same
27 steps
1:15 1:15
Time (mm:ss)
Dell Pro 14 Plus
with AMD Ryzen AI 7
PRO 350 processor
Dell Pro 14 Plus
with Intel Core Ultra 7
processor 268V
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI
with AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX
PRO 375 processor
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI
with Intel Core Ultra 7
processor 268V
Figure 2: Total hands-on time (mm:ss) when using Configuration Manager to add drivers to the boot image and driver
package. Source: PT.
Completing updates
Regularly applying updates across your PC fleet is essential to maintaining security and functionality in today’s
fast-paced business environment. When the method used to update devices is consistent across your entire
fleet and the required time is predictable, IT teams can focus more on high-impact tasks that move your
business forward.
We found that update process for all four laptops was identical, each requiring the same 25 steps. Admin time
to complete the update was 1 minute 32 seconds for the pair of Dell laptops, and 2 minutes 2 seconds for the
pair of HP laptops, confirming the process and hands-on time to update systems was the same for both AMD
and Intel devices.
Equal time, equal tools: Measuring PC deployment time in multi-vendor environments August 2025 | 4
HP
Dell
Completing system updates
1:32
1:32
2:00
3:00
1:00
0:00
We
followed
the same
25 steps
We
followed
the same
25 steps
2:02 2:02
Time (mm:ss)
Dell Pro 14 Plus
with AMD Ryzen AI 7
PRO 350 processor
Dell Pro 14 Plus
with Intel Core Ultra 7
processor 268V
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI
with AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX
PRO 375 processor
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI
with Intel Core Ultra 7
processor 268V
Figure 3: Total hands-on time (mm:ss) when using Configuration Manager to complete system updates. Source: PT.
Reimaging systems
Reimaging systems is an essential part of lifecycle management, ensuring that every new user starts fresh
with a clean, secure environment. Efficient completion times and repeatable methods for reimaging help IT
administrators reduce operational bottlenecks and improve overall service delivery.
When we evaluated the method and hands-on time required to complete a system reimage, we found that all
four laptops followed the same four-step process. The hands-on time required for reimaging ranged from 12
to 33 seconds, with time differences due to varied boot times. This, combined with the identical process across
all systems, confirms that administrators can reliably expect a consistent reimaging experience that takes only a
small fraction of their workday, whether managing a mixed-CPU fleet or a uniform one.
HP
Dell
Reimaging systems
0:12
0:15
0:20
0:40
0:30
0:10
We
followed
the same
4 steps
We
followed
the same
4 steps
0:19
0:33
Time (mm:ss)
0:00 Dell Pro 14 Plus
with AMD Ryzen AI 7
PRO 350 processor
Dell Pro 14 Plus
with Intel Core Ultra 7
processor 268V
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI
with AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX
PRO 375 processor
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI
with Intel Core Ultra 7
processor 268V
Figure 4: Total hands-on time (mm:ss) when using Configuration Manager to reimage one laptop. Source: PT.
Equal time, equal tools: Measuring PC deployment time in multi-vendor environments August 2025 | 5
Use an identical deployment method in a similar amount of time
with Windows Autopilot, regardless of processor
Deploying the OS and drivers
While Configuration Manager remains a common management and deployment tool, some organizations are
shifting to newer solutions such as Windows Autopilot, which offers IT admins the powerful option of deploying
devices directly to end-users. Companies making this shift may have management complexity concerns around
moving to a mixed-CPU fleet. To ease those concerns, we conducted an identical version of our testing using
Windows Autopilot combined with Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure Active Directory) and Microsoft Intune.
Unlike with our other methods, we did not install drivers separately, since Windows Autopilot installs drivers
automatically during OS installation.
Our results confirmed the deployment process was exactly the same for all four laptops and the processor
had no effect on the required effort. While there were small differences across the laptops in the system time
required, the hands-on time for our engineer was the same for all four devices. When we looked at just the effort
and hands-on time to deploy the systems, the processor choice did not impact the result.
HP
Dell
Deploying one laptop using Windows Autopilot
6:00
9:00
3:00
8:08
8:26
5:14
We
followed
the same
54 steps
3:12
4:46
8:08
3:12
8:10
7:53
Hands-on System
Hands-on System Hands-on System
Hands-on System
We
followed
the same
54 steps
3:12
3:12
4:58
8:10
4:41
Time (mm:ss)
0:00 Dell Pro 14 Plus
with AMD Ryzen AI 7
PRO 350 processor
Dell Pro 14 Plus
with Intel Core Ultra 7
processor 268V
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI
with AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX
PRO 375 processor
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI
with Intel Core Ultra 7
processor 268V
Figure 5: Total time (mm:ss) to deploy one laptop using Microsoft Entra ID, Microsoft Intune, and Windows Autopilot. Hands-on
time refers to the time it took us to start the installation process on the target PC, and system time refers to the time it took for
the Autopilot Provisioning process to complete. Source: PT.
Equal time, equal tools: Measuring PC deployment time in multi-vendor environments August 2025 | 6
Completing updates
When we evaluated process of updating devices through Intune, the trend continued—the process for all four
laptops was identical, each requiring the same 11 steps to complete the update. All the laptops we tested also
required the same 27 seconds of hands-on time to complete the update. This confirms that, as was the case with
every other management task we investigated, the processor in the device had no effect on the required effort
or time to update the laptop.
HP
Dell
Completing updates using Windows Autopilot
0:27
0:27
0:20
0:30
0:10
We
followed
the same
11 steps
We
followed
the same
11 steps
0:27 0:27
Time (mm:ss)
0:00 Dell Pro 14 Plus
with AMD Ryzen AI 7
PRO 350 processor
Dell Pro 14 Plus
with Intel Core Ultra 7
processor 268V
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI
with AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX
PRO 375 processor
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI
with Intel Core Ultra 7
processor 268V
Figure 6: Total hands-on time (mm:ss) when using Windows Autopilot to deploy one laptop. Source: PT.
Equal time, equal tools: Measuring PC deployment time in multi-vendor environments August 2025 | 7
Wiping systems
IT administrators regularly need to wipe and reimage systems as part of routine device lifecycle management,
whether to prepare laptops for new users, resolve persistent issues, or maintain security standards. When this
process is consistent and quick across different devices, it can reduce operational bottlenecks and allow IT teams
to efficiently improve performance, remove malware, and set up new users without unnecessary delays.
When we tested the process of wiping devices through Intune, we discovered all the laptops required the same
four-step process to complete the wipe. Plus, each system took the same 20 seconds to complete the process,
providing yet another example of the identical management process when overseeing a mixed-CPU fleet.
HP
Dell
Wiping devices
0:20
0:20
0:20
0:30
0:10
We
followed
the same
4 steps
We
followed
the same
4 steps
0:20 0:20
Time (mm:ss)
0:00 Dell Pro 14 Plus
with AMD Ryzen AI 7
PRO 350 processor
Dell Pro 14 Plus
with Intel Core Ultra 7
processor 268V
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI
with AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX
PRO 375 processor
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI
with Intel Core Ultra 7
processor 268V
Figure 7: Total hands-on time (mm:ss) when using Windows Autopilot to wipe one laptop. Source: PT.
Free up vital IT time with Windows Autopilot
Many OEMs provide solutions, such as Windows Autopilot, that offer IT administrators the convenience of shipping devices
directly to end users. This allows IT to skip the time-consuming process of configuring individual systems. In a previous study, we
evaluated the process of ordering and provisioning devices with Windows Autopilot and discovered that it can allow vendors to
send laptops directly to end users, who can then complete provisioning on their own by performing a few simple steps after first
boot. Conversely, the traditional hands-on method requires the device to first ship to IT, who will need to provision the device and
then ship it to the end user.
In an organization employing many remote workers, locking IT time to a hands-on provisioning process could become a major
bottleneck. To learn more about our test results, read the report.
Equal time, equal tools: Measuring PC deployment time in multi-vendor environments August 2025 | 8
Conclusion
OS deployment and device management is complex at any scale and can limit IT’s focus on high-impact work.
We conducted a suite of tests to explore whether OS deployment and system management becomes more
complicated when overseeing a mixed-processor fleet. When we measured mixed-CPU PC deployment and
management time and effort using two different Microsoft endpoint management toolkits, our experiences were
comparable, regardless of processor. The deployment processes also took nearly the same amount of time within
each approach, with slight variance between the required hands-on admin time across laptops being the only
distinction. When we investigated the process of installing drivers as well as updating, wiping, and reimaging
devices, we found that all four tasks required the same number of steps across all tested devices, confirming that
administrators can expect a consistent management experience in those areas regardless of the processors in
their device fleets.
With an equivalent process to deploy, update, wipe, and reimage devices, and nearly the same amount of
required hands-on time regardless of processor, our test results demonstrate that concerns about managing
a mixed-processor fleet with two separate deployment processes can become a thing of the past. Consistent
methods allow IT administrators to spend less time learning new processes and more time supporting
your organizations’ growth through improved user support, robust security measures, and innovative
technology projects.
1. Michael Wallent, “Introducing the Microsoft Intune product family,” accessed July 8, 2025,
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/microsoft-intune-blog/introducing-the-microsoft-intune-product-family/ba-p/3650769
Principled Technologies is a registered trademark of Principled Technologies, Inc.
All other product names are the trademarks of their respective owners.
For additional information, review the science behind this report.
Principled
Technologies®
Facts matter.®
Principled
Technologies®
Facts matter.®
This project was commissioned by AMD.
Read the science behind this report at https://facts.pt/YK179ct
Equal time, equal tools: Measuring PC deployment time in multi-vendor environments August 2025 | 9

More Related Content

PDF
Deploy operating systems and drivers to PCs with a single process regardless ...
PDF
Deploy Windows 10 Pro images using one consistent process, no matter the CPU
PDF
A consistent Windows 10 Pro image deployment experience—regardless of processor
PPTX
MD-102T00-ENU-PowerPoint_xxxxxxxxxxxx07.pptx
PDF
Speed up (and simplify) employee device management
PDF
Get more comprehensive remote IT support capabilities on a Dell OptiPlex 7070...
PPTX
Windows Accelerate IT Pro Bootcamp: Platform Delivery (Module 2 of 8)
PDF
Make the most of your time as well as your space with Dell OptiPlex small and...
Deploy operating systems and drivers to PCs with a single process regardless ...
Deploy Windows 10 Pro images using one consistent process, no matter the CPU
A consistent Windows 10 Pro image deployment experience—regardless of processor
MD-102T00-ENU-PowerPoint_xxxxxxxxxxxx07.pptx
Speed up (and simplify) employee device management
Get more comprehensive remote IT support capabilities on a Dell OptiPlex 7070...
Windows Accelerate IT Pro Bootcamp: Platform Delivery (Module 2 of 8)
Make the most of your time as well as your space with Dell OptiPlex small and...

Similar to Equal time, equal tools: Measuring PC deployment time in multi-vendor environments (20)

PDF
Check items off your to-do list faster with Dell OptiPlex small and micro for...
PDF
Use less energy—and get a performance boost
PDF
Boot faster and get more raw CPU performance at a lower cost with Windows 10 ...
PDF
Faster, simpler employee device management with Dell Client Command Suite
PDF
Dell EMC™ ProDeploy set up a production-ready environment in less time and fe...
PPT
Win 7 & Intel V Pro Tech
PDF
Remote Workers MDM Management
PDF
Faster, easier deployment of Dell PowerEdge servers helps it and your business
PDF
Windows 8.1 deployment to p cs a guide for education
PDF
Fujitsu spain revolutionizing_public_administration
PDF
Boosting productivity and security with modern devices: A comparative study
PPT
intel ignite refresh_rmd
PDF
Dell PowerEdge VRTX and M-series compute nodes configuration study
PDF
More efficient service deployment with Dell Active System Manager
PDF
Analysis Of AMD And Intel
PPTX
ppt ch08
PDF
Run more applications without expanding your datacenter
PDF
Reduce hands-on deployment times to near zero* with iDRAC9 automation
PDF
325711-001US-secured-old
PDF
A better experience through performance: Intel Core i5 & Core i3 processor-po...
Check items off your to-do list faster with Dell OptiPlex small and micro for...
Use less energy—and get a performance boost
Boot faster and get more raw CPU performance at a lower cost with Windows 10 ...
Faster, simpler employee device management with Dell Client Command Suite
Dell EMC™ ProDeploy set up a production-ready environment in less time and fe...
Win 7 & Intel V Pro Tech
Remote Workers MDM Management
Faster, easier deployment of Dell PowerEdge servers helps it and your business
Windows 8.1 deployment to p cs a guide for education
Fujitsu spain revolutionizing_public_administration
Boosting productivity and security with modern devices: A comparative study
intel ignite refresh_rmd
Dell PowerEdge VRTX and M-series compute nodes configuration study
More efficient service deployment with Dell Active System Manager
Analysis Of AMD And Intel
ppt ch08
Run more applications without expanding your datacenter
Reduce hands-on deployment times to near zero* with iDRAC9 automation
325711-001US-secured-old
A better experience through performance: Intel Core i5 & Core i3 processor-po...
Ad

More from Principled Technologies (20)

PDF
Unlocking hybrid cloud efficiency: Dell AX System for Azure Local with PowerFlex
PDF
Energize your business strategy with the new Dell Pro 14 Plus
PDF
Unlock faster data-driven business decisions with Azure Databricks - Infographic
PDF
Supercharge AI performance and enhance productivity with the HP EliteBook X G...
PDF
Supercharge AI performance and enhance productivity with the HP EliteBook X G...
PDF
Modernizing your data center with Dell and AMD
PDF
Dell Pro 14 Plus: Be better prepared for what’s coming
PDF
Security features in Dell, HP, and Lenovo PC systems: A research-based compar...
PDF
Make GenAI investments go further with the Dell AI Factory - Infographic
PDF
Make GenAI investments go further with the Dell AI Factory
PDF
Unlock faster insights with Azure Databricks
PDF
Speed up your transactions and save with new Dell PowerEdge R7725 servers pow...
PDF
The case for on-premises AI
PDF
Dell PowerEdge server cooling: Choose the cooling options that match the need...
PDF
Speed up your transactions and save with new Dell PowerEdge R7725 servers pow...
PDF
Propel your business into the future by refreshing with new one-socket Dell P...
PDF
Propel your business into the future by refreshing with new one-socket Dell P...
PDF
Unlock flexibility, security, and scalability by migrating MySQL databases to...
PDF
Migrate your PostgreSQL databases to Microsoft Azure for plug‑and‑play simpli...
PDF
On-premises AI approaches: The advantages of a turnkey solution, HPE Private ...
Unlocking hybrid cloud efficiency: Dell AX System for Azure Local with PowerFlex
Energize your business strategy with the new Dell Pro 14 Plus
Unlock faster data-driven business decisions with Azure Databricks - Infographic
Supercharge AI performance and enhance productivity with the HP EliteBook X G...
Supercharge AI performance and enhance productivity with the HP EliteBook X G...
Modernizing your data center with Dell and AMD
Dell Pro 14 Plus: Be better prepared for what’s coming
Security features in Dell, HP, and Lenovo PC systems: A research-based compar...
Make GenAI investments go further with the Dell AI Factory - Infographic
Make GenAI investments go further with the Dell AI Factory
Unlock faster insights with Azure Databricks
Speed up your transactions and save with new Dell PowerEdge R7725 servers pow...
The case for on-premises AI
Dell PowerEdge server cooling: Choose the cooling options that match the need...
Speed up your transactions and save with new Dell PowerEdge R7725 servers pow...
Propel your business into the future by refreshing with new one-socket Dell P...
Propel your business into the future by refreshing with new one-socket Dell P...
Unlock flexibility, security, and scalability by migrating MySQL databases to...
Migrate your PostgreSQL databases to Microsoft Azure for plug‑and‑play simpli...
On-premises AI approaches: The advantages of a turnkey solution, HPE Private ...
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
ENT215_Completing-a-large-scale-migration-and-modernization-with-AWS.pdf
PDF
Developing a website for English-speaking practice to English as a foreign la...
PPT
What is a Computer? Input Devices /output devices
PDF
A contest of sentiment analysis: k-nearest neighbor versus neural network
PPTX
Group 1 Presentation -Planning and Decision Making .pptx
PDF
August Patch Tuesday
PDF
1 - Historical Antecedents, Social Consideration.pdf
PDF
DASA ADMISSION 2024_FirstRound_FirstRank_LastRank.pdf
PDF
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles – August ’25 Week III
PPTX
Chapter 5: Probability Theory and Statistics
PDF
Video forgery: An extensive analysis of inter-and intra-frame manipulation al...
PDF
Transform Your ITIL® 4 & ITSM Strategy with AI in 2025.pdf
PPTX
observCloud-Native Containerability and monitoring.pptx
PDF
Assigned Numbers - 2025 - Bluetooth® Document
PDF
How ambidextrous entrepreneurial leaders react to the artificial intelligence...
PDF
Getting started with AI Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
PPT
Module 1.ppt Iot fundamentals and Architecture
PPTX
O2C Customer Invoices to Receipt V15A.pptx
PPTX
The various Industrial Revolutions .pptx
PDF
Taming the Chaos: How to Turn Unstructured Data into Decisions
ENT215_Completing-a-large-scale-migration-and-modernization-with-AWS.pdf
Developing a website for English-speaking practice to English as a foreign la...
What is a Computer? Input Devices /output devices
A contest of sentiment analysis: k-nearest neighbor versus neural network
Group 1 Presentation -Planning and Decision Making .pptx
August Patch Tuesday
1 - Historical Antecedents, Social Consideration.pdf
DASA ADMISSION 2024_FirstRound_FirstRank_LastRank.pdf
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles – August ’25 Week III
Chapter 5: Probability Theory and Statistics
Video forgery: An extensive analysis of inter-and intra-frame manipulation al...
Transform Your ITIL® 4 & ITSM Strategy with AI in 2025.pdf
observCloud-Native Containerability and monitoring.pptx
Assigned Numbers - 2025 - Bluetooth® Document
How ambidextrous entrepreneurial leaders react to the artificial intelligence...
Getting started with AI Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Module 1.ppt Iot fundamentals and Architecture
O2C Customer Invoices to Receipt V15A.pptx
The various Industrial Revolutions .pptx
Taming the Chaos: How to Turn Unstructured Data into Decisions

Equal time, equal tools: Measuring PC deployment time in multi-vendor environments

  • 1. Experience similar hands- on deployment times for both AMD and Intel processor-powered systems Complete common management tasks using identical processes whether the CPU is from AMD or Intel Use the same deployment method for both AMD and Intel processor-powered systems Equal time, equal tools: Measuring PC deployment time in multi-vendor environments Investigating the experience of simultaneously deploying AMD and Intel processors in a Microsoft-managed environment The modern workforce isn’t confined simply to traditional office buildings, with many industries utilizing remote or hybrid work models that see employees logging in from different locations. While a mobile workforce has its advantages, managing a distributed laptop fleet can present new challenges. IT admins need a straightforward method to deploy new laptops to end users, regardless of their location. Meanwhile, decision-makers may find the best laptop purchase choices feature processors from different vendors. This means that admins need to be able to manage a mixed-CPU fleet with the least fuss possible. To gauge the complexities of deploying and managing a mixed-CPU fleet, we deployed two pairs of Dell and HP laptops. Each pair included one AMD and one Intel processor. Because different teams may use different Microsoft deployment and management tools, we also utilized both sides of Microsoft Endpoint Manager, with Configuration Manager as a traditional approach and Windows Autopilot as a modern approach. To complete the evaluation, we performed several common management tasks, including system wipes for decommissioning or repurposing. Our findings will relieve IT administrators managing diverse fleets: there was no difference in the deployment effort due to the processor. Additionally, the processes we used to complete common lifecycle management tasks were identical in both the required hands-on time and the number of steps involved. While we did discover small deployment time discrepancies between the devices themselves, this amounted to no more than a few minutes. Continue reading for more on the impact of our test results. Equal time, equal tools: Measuring PC deployment time in multi-vendor environments August 2025 A Principled Technologies report: Hands-on testing. Real-world results.
  • 2. How we tested Among the many daily tasks IT teams face when managing large device fleets, deploying operating systems and installing drivers should be among the easiest to perform. A straightforward and repeatable management method across your entire PC fleet, regardless of processor, allows IT admins to dedicate more of their time to tackling complex business challenges and unlocking your organization’s full potential. To understand the overlaps in deployment methods between AMD and Intel processor-powered systems, we conducted our testing using two pairs of laptops with nearly identical configurations except the processor. We used two different AMD processors to further demonstrate how processor selection had no impact on an admin’s effort to manage the laptops in our test scenarios. Dell systems: • Dell Pro 14 Plus with an AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 processor • Dell Pro 14 Plus with an Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 268V HP systems: • HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI with an AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 processor • HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI with an Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 268V Our testing consisted of two phases. During the first phase, we determined the required time and effort to deploy Windows 11 Pro operating systems and install drivers on both the AMD and Intel processor-powered devices using a traditional approach using: • Microsoft Configuration Manager • Microsoft Active Directory Finally, we connected each laptop to a deployment switch and powered it on, enabling the deployment server to initiate and deliver the OS installation to the target machine. We also investigated how deployment works with newer cloud-centric management tools from Microsoft, using: • Windows Autopilot • Microsoft Entra ID • Microsoft Intune, which according to Microsoft is a “cloud-based unified endpoint management solution… [that] has become a market leader.”1 We reset the devices to factory settings and deployed operating systems, added device IDs to Intune, configured organizational settings, and performed user logins on each device. Consistent evaluation with a multi-year perspective On top of initiating upgrades across your entire PC fleet, you occasionally need to buy fresh laptops for new hires and replace faulty devices. We’ve explored deployment in fleets with heterogeneous processors in reports dating back to 2018. Then, we evaluated the image deployment process on Windows 10 on similarly configured AMD and Intel processor-powered devices. We repeated our testing in 2021 and again in 2023, with the 2023 study including an approach using Windows Autopilot. In each of these studies, our results confirmed that IT admins could use an identical deployment method for a Microsoft Windows 10 (or Windows 10 Pro) image with both AMD and Intel processor-based devices. In addition, in 2023, using Windows Autopilot with the AMD processor-powered laptops produced an even speedier deployment process. For more details, read our 2018 report, our 2021 report, or our 2023 report. Equal time, equal tools: Measuring PC deployment time in multi-vendor environments August 2025 | 2
  • 3. Deploy laptops with equal effort and comparable time, regardless of processor, using traditional Configuration Manager OS deployment As your organization grows, so does the value in purchasing devices that deliver the best performance for your increasingly specific business needs. If that includes shifting to a mixed-CPU environment, for example to explore possible processing efficiencies for specialized workloads, you’ll want to ensure this won’t also introduce new hassles in managing these devices. Our test results show there’s no need to fret. When testing with Configuration Manager, OS deployment required the same number of steps irrespective of processor for all four laptops (see Figure 1). Both the Dell laptops and the HP laptops required 30 total steps: 27 prerequisite steps as a one-time cost for the Windows version and drivers we used for testing, and then just 3 additional steps to complete the deployment through Configuration Manager. The processor vendor had no effect on deployment steps. The required OS deployment time was also nearly identical among each pair of systems. The difference in required deployment time for the Dell devices was within 5 percent, with the AMD processor-based system slightly slower. The difference between HP laptops was within 2 percent, this time with the AMD processor- powered device taking less time. When we excluded the time the devices were processing on their own and focus just on our admin’s hands-on time, the difference between the Dell devices was just 3 seconds, or less than a 3 percent difference. The difference between the HP devices grew to just over 9 percent; however, this represented a difference of only 14 seconds. Altogether, our results show how little of a difference the processor made. Time (h:mm:ss) Deploying one laptop using Configuration Manager 0:00:00 1:00:00 2:00:00 1:30:00 0:30:00 Dell Pro 14 Plus with AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 processor Dell Pro 14 Plus with Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 268V 1:39:27 Dell HP We followed the same 30 steps 1:42:18 1:44:05 HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI with AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 processor HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI with Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 268V 1:44:09 1:46:14 We followed the same 30 steps 1:41:48 1:43:39 1:37:43 1:39:27 Hands-on System Hands-on System Hands-on System Hands-on System 00:01:47 00:01:44 00:02:21 00:02:35 Figure 1: Total time (hh:mm:ss) to deploy one laptop using Configuration Manager. Hands-on time is how long it took us to start the installation process on the target PC, and system time is how long it took our task sequence to install the OS and applications and configure the system. Source: PT. Equal time, equal tools: Measuring PC deployment time in multi-vendor environments August 2025 | 3
  • 4. Installing drivers Preparing new devices for end-users typically involves IT installing company-approved drivers and applications after OS deployment. To understand how this process compares across different laptops, we measured the required time and effort to add driver packages to each system. We uploaded the packages to Configuration Manager prior to deploying the OS images, allowing its automated sequence to handle all OS updates and customizations on the devices. For all four laptops, installing drivers took the same 27 steps, confirming the process was identical regardless of processor or manufacturer. On top of that, the required time to complete driver installation was identical within each pair of laptops. This indicates that IT admins can anticipate a consistent process in both effort and time for not only OS deployment, but driver installation as well. HP Dell Adding drivers to the boot image and driver package 1:15 1:15 2:00 3:00 1:00 0:00 We followed the same 27 steps We followed the same 27 steps 1:15 1:15 Time (mm:ss) Dell Pro 14 Plus with AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 processor Dell Pro 14 Plus with Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 268V HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI with AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 processor HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI with Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 268V Figure 2: Total hands-on time (mm:ss) when using Configuration Manager to add drivers to the boot image and driver package. Source: PT. Completing updates Regularly applying updates across your PC fleet is essential to maintaining security and functionality in today’s fast-paced business environment. When the method used to update devices is consistent across your entire fleet and the required time is predictable, IT teams can focus more on high-impact tasks that move your business forward. We found that update process for all four laptops was identical, each requiring the same 25 steps. Admin time to complete the update was 1 minute 32 seconds for the pair of Dell laptops, and 2 minutes 2 seconds for the pair of HP laptops, confirming the process and hands-on time to update systems was the same for both AMD and Intel devices. Equal time, equal tools: Measuring PC deployment time in multi-vendor environments August 2025 | 4
  • 5. HP Dell Completing system updates 1:32 1:32 2:00 3:00 1:00 0:00 We followed the same 25 steps We followed the same 25 steps 2:02 2:02 Time (mm:ss) Dell Pro 14 Plus with AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 processor Dell Pro 14 Plus with Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 268V HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI with AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 processor HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI with Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 268V Figure 3: Total hands-on time (mm:ss) when using Configuration Manager to complete system updates. Source: PT. Reimaging systems Reimaging systems is an essential part of lifecycle management, ensuring that every new user starts fresh with a clean, secure environment. Efficient completion times and repeatable methods for reimaging help IT administrators reduce operational bottlenecks and improve overall service delivery. When we evaluated the method and hands-on time required to complete a system reimage, we found that all four laptops followed the same four-step process. The hands-on time required for reimaging ranged from 12 to 33 seconds, with time differences due to varied boot times. This, combined with the identical process across all systems, confirms that administrators can reliably expect a consistent reimaging experience that takes only a small fraction of their workday, whether managing a mixed-CPU fleet or a uniform one. HP Dell Reimaging systems 0:12 0:15 0:20 0:40 0:30 0:10 We followed the same 4 steps We followed the same 4 steps 0:19 0:33 Time (mm:ss) 0:00 Dell Pro 14 Plus with AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 processor Dell Pro 14 Plus with Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 268V HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI with AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 processor HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI with Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 268V Figure 4: Total hands-on time (mm:ss) when using Configuration Manager to reimage one laptop. Source: PT. Equal time, equal tools: Measuring PC deployment time in multi-vendor environments August 2025 | 5
  • 6. Use an identical deployment method in a similar amount of time with Windows Autopilot, regardless of processor Deploying the OS and drivers While Configuration Manager remains a common management and deployment tool, some organizations are shifting to newer solutions such as Windows Autopilot, which offers IT admins the powerful option of deploying devices directly to end-users. Companies making this shift may have management complexity concerns around moving to a mixed-CPU fleet. To ease those concerns, we conducted an identical version of our testing using Windows Autopilot combined with Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure Active Directory) and Microsoft Intune. Unlike with our other methods, we did not install drivers separately, since Windows Autopilot installs drivers automatically during OS installation. Our results confirmed the deployment process was exactly the same for all four laptops and the processor had no effect on the required effort. While there were small differences across the laptops in the system time required, the hands-on time for our engineer was the same for all four devices. When we looked at just the effort and hands-on time to deploy the systems, the processor choice did not impact the result. HP Dell Deploying one laptop using Windows Autopilot 6:00 9:00 3:00 8:08 8:26 5:14 We followed the same 54 steps 3:12 4:46 8:08 3:12 8:10 7:53 Hands-on System Hands-on System Hands-on System Hands-on System We followed the same 54 steps 3:12 3:12 4:58 8:10 4:41 Time (mm:ss) 0:00 Dell Pro 14 Plus with AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 processor Dell Pro 14 Plus with Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 268V HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI with AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 processor HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI with Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 268V Figure 5: Total time (mm:ss) to deploy one laptop using Microsoft Entra ID, Microsoft Intune, and Windows Autopilot. Hands-on time refers to the time it took us to start the installation process on the target PC, and system time refers to the time it took for the Autopilot Provisioning process to complete. Source: PT. Equal time, equal tools: Measuring PC deployment time in multi-vendor environments August 2025 | 6
  • 7. Completing updates When we evaluated process of updating devices through Intune, the trend continued—the process for all four laptops was identical, each requiring the same 11 steps to complete the update. All the laptops we tested also required the same 27 seconds of hands-on time to complete the update. This confirms that, as was the case with every other management task we investigated, the processor in the device had no effect on the required effort or time to update the laptop. HP Dell Completing updates using Windows Autopilot 0:27 0:27 0:20 0:30 0:10 We followed the same 11 steps We followed the same 11 steps 0:27 0:27 Time (mm:ss) 0:00 Dell Pro 14 Plus with AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 processor Dell Pro 14 Plus with Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 268V HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI with AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 processor HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI with Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 268V Figure 6: Total hands-on time (mm:ss) when using Windows Autopilot to deploy one laptop. Source: PT. Equal time, equal tools: Measuring PC deployment time in multi-vendor environments August 2025 | 7
  • 8. Wiping systems IT administrators regularly need to wipe and reimage systems as part of routine device lifecycle management, whether to prepare laptops for new users, resolve persistent issues, or maintain security standards. When this process is consistent and quick across different devices, it can reduce operational bottlenecks and allow IT teams to efficiently improve performance, remove malware, and set up new users without unnecessary delays. When we tested the process of wiping devices through Intune, we discovered all the laptops required the same four-step process to complete the wipe. Plus, each system took the same 20 seconds to complete the process, providing yet another example of the identical management process when overseeing a mixed-CPU fleet. HP Dell Wiping devices 0:20 0:20 0:20 0:30 0:10 We followed the same 4 steps We followed the same 4 steps 0:20 0:20 Time (mm:ss) 0:00 Dell Pro 14 Plus with AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 processor Dell Pro 14 Plus with Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 268V HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI with AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 processor HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI with Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 268V Figure 7: Total hands-on time (mm:ss) when using Windows Autopilot to wipe one laptop. Source: PT. Free up vital IT time with Windows Autopilot Many OEMs provide solutions, such as Windows Autopilot, that offer IT administrators the convenience of shipping devices directly to end users. This allows IT to skip the time-consuming process of configuring individual systems. In a previous study, we evaluated the process of ordering and provisioning devices with Windows Autopilot and discovered that it can allow vendors to send laptops directly to end users, who can then complete provisioning on their own by performing a few simple steps after first boot. Conversely, the traditional hands-on method requires the device to first ship to IT, who will need to provision the device and then ship it to the end user. In an organization employing many remote workers, locking IT time to a hands-on provisioning process could become a major bottleneck. To learn more about our test results, read the report. Equal time, equal tools: Measuring PC deployment time in multi-vendor environments August 2025 | 8
  • 9. Conclusion OS deployment and device management is complex at any scale and can limit IT’s focus on high-impact work. We conducted a suite of tests to explore whether OS deployment and system management becomes more complicated when overseeing a mixed-processor fleet. When we measured mixed-CPU PC deployment and management time and effort using two different Microsoft endpoint management toolkits, our experiences were comparable, regardless of processor. The deployment processes also took nearly the same amount of time within each approach, with slight variance between the required hands-on admin time across laptops being the only distinction. When we investigated the process of installing drivers as well as updating, wiping, and reimaging devices, we found that all four tasks required the same number of steps across all tested devices, confirming that administrators can expect a consistent management experience in those areas regardless of the processors in their device fleets. With an equivalent process to deploy, update, wipe, and reimage devices, and nearly the same amount of required hands-on time regardless of processor, our test results demonstrate that concerns about managing a mixed-processor fleet with two separate deployment processes can become a thing of the past. Consistent methods allow IT administrators to spend less time learning new processes and more time supporting your organizations’ growth through improved user support, robust security measures, and innovative technology projects. 1. Michael Wallent, “Introducing the Microsoft Intune product family,” accessed July 8, 2025, https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/microsoft-intune-blog/introducing-the-microsoft-intune-product-family/ba-p/3650769 Principled Technologies is a registered trademark of Principled Technologies, Inc. All other product names are the trademarks of their respective owners. For additional information, review the science behind this report. Principled Technologies® Facts matter.® Principled Technologies® Facts matter.® This project was commissioned by AMD. Read the science behind this report at https://facts.pt/YK179ct Equal time, equal tools: Measuring PC deployment time in multi-vendor environments August 2025 | 9