SlideShare a Scribd company logo
What kind of
institution
would distribute
your product
and why?
Different Distributors
 When I researched different films of my
chosen genre, there was an array of
different companies.
 I chose Universal as my distributor as 20th Century Fox
was more related to the science-fiction sub genre of
apocalyptic films, whereas Universal has created horror
films. In the past 5 years they have created very
successful horror films (The Wolfman, Devil, The Thing,
Mama) as well as apocalyptic, dystopian films (The
Purge, The Purge :Anarchy, Doomsday, Dawn of the
Dead). It seems there was a gap in the market of this
genre from Universal as there hasn’t been a dystopian
horror film as of recently which was another reason why
I chose to use this distributor.
 Even their ideology is bringing films to life, using an array
of different subsidiary companies in the development,
production and distribution process.
 They have also had success in 2014 in terms of film,
earning $861 million from the top 100 films only. This
means that they are a successful company who would
be suitable to distribute my product.
 I also chose Lionsgate as, despite being a new
contender in the film industry – making it’s first
debut in 1997- they have had economic success
in the global market within the past 5 years. One
of their most famous franchise is The Hunger
Games (dystopian, sci-fi), earning over $2.3 billion
from the first three films alone. Since then, they
have increasingly rose to fame, continuing on to
distribute the Divergent franchise, overall winning
the company 20 Academy Awards. Again, the
reason why I chose Lionsgate was because of their
success, as they are the ideal company alongside
Universal to combine together in a synergetic way
to distribute my product as they are both
economically successful and well known in the film
industry.
 I used both Universal and Lionsgate logos at the
beginning of my piece so that the audience knows of
the production and distribution team involved in my
piece. I didn’t include my own logos as Universal and
Lionsgate are well known Hollywood companies and
when the audience sees their logos, it is instantly
recognisable.
 I included their idents alongside their music as well so
that the audience can recognise the company by their
scoring and music even before the logo has fully
appeared. Again this is because they are instantly
recognisable, allowing the audience to make the
connection of the two companies when their logos
appear. If they know of film history it can allow their
expectations to increase as they know that what
they’re watching is of a good standard based on their
knowledge of the companies’ previous products they
have distributed.
Production & Distribution
 Typically Universal would either producer and distribute
their films or hand over distribution rights to small
subsidiary companies (Working Title, Focus Features)
from different parts of the world in order to reach the full
global market, increasing their profits and revenue.
 Lionsgate works in a similar way and in the past recent
years, they have produced and distributed their own
films on account of their increasing revenue from recent
movie successes.
 Because they distribute their own products, this can
save money and as they are conglomerates, all the
profit stays within the production cycle, gaining more
profit which can be put towards budgets of new films
instead of sharing the profits between lots of different
subsidaries. As Lionsgate and Universal are working
together, the profits would be split halfway.
Exhibition
 Cinemas fall into 1 of 2 categories: national chains; and
independent exhibitors. The specific programming will
depend on the target audience, with large chains often
filling their multiplexes with blockbusters and individual
independents more likely to cater to art-house crowds.
 Lionsgate and Universal both exhibit their films in
national chains to increase admissions and reach as
many of their target audience as they can as they both
distribute blockbusters rather than artistic films.
 My piece would be exhibited in a national chain
cinema to increase revenue, audience admissions and
it is more easily accessible to my target audience as
Odeon has over 120 chains in the UK as well as
Cineworld with 82. This means that location wise,
everyone has access to see my product whereas there
are less art-house based theatres.
Sites Used
 Imdb.com
 Wikipedia.com
 Boxofficemojo.com

More Related Content

PPTX
Evaluation #3
PPTX
What kind of institution might distribute your media?
PPTX
Film studio research
PPT
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
PPT
Film distribution
PDF
What kind of media institution might distribute your media products and why?
DOC
Similarities and differences skyfall ill manors
PPTX
Section b synergy
Evaluation #3
What kind of institution might distribute your media?
Film studio research
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
Film distribution
What kind of media institution might distribute your media products and why?
Similarities and differences skyfall ill manors
Section b synergy

What's hot (18)

DOCX
02 g322 section b film industry introduction 2013
PPTX
Warner bros
PPTX
Film distribution
PPT
Independent v hollywood distribution
PPTX
Media ownership
PPTX
Presentation1
PPT
Film distribution
PPTX
Film distribution
PPTX
Presentation1
PPTX
Warner Bros. Synergy and Convergence
DOC
06 g322 section b distribution
PPTX
Small production companies
PPTX
Distribution Channels of Warner Bros.
DOCX
Media production is dominated by global institution which sells their product...
PPTX
Warner bros. power point
PPTX
Impact of Media Ownership on Products Available
PPTX
Media ownership
KEY
Research into Institutions
02 g322 section b film industry introduction 2013
Warner bros
Film distribution
Independent v hollywood distribution
Media ownership
Presentation1
Film distribution
Film distribution
Presentation1
Warner Bros. Synergy and Convergence
06 g322 section b distribution
Small production companies
Distribution Channels of Warner Bros.
Media production is dominated by global institution which sells their product...
Warner bros. power point
Impact of Media Ownership on Products Available
Media ownership
Research into Institutions
Ad

Viewers also liked (10)

PPTX
Tía maría: PNP 'siembra' objeto en manifestante
PPT
Euzebio baixa grande
PDF
Modelado de motor cc
ODP
Tarea 5
PPTX
Construcción I
PDF
Physical and personality descriptions
PDF
LICENCECHECK Ludicrous Laws of the Road!
PDF
IPO Journey May '15
PDF
Resort Hotel Mcquarie
Tía maría: PNP 'siembra' objeto en manifestante
Euzebio baixa grande
Modelado de motor cc
Tarea 5
Construcción I
Physical and personality descriptions
LICENCECHECK Ludicrous Laws of the Road!
IPO Journey May '15
Resort Hotel Mcquarie
Ad

Similar to Evaluation #3 UPDATED (20)

PPTX
Q3) WHAT KIND OF MEDIA INSTITUTION MIGHT DISTRIBUTE YOUR MEDIA PRODUCT AND WHY?
PPTX
Media evalutaions Q3
PPTX
Question 3
PPTX
Question 3
PPTX
Evaluation task
PPTX
Presentation1
PPTX
Question 3
ODP
Media 3
PPTX
EVALUATION QUESTION THREE
PPTX
Evaluation Question 3
DOCX
Institutional research
PPTX
Question 3
PPTX
Question 3
PPTX
Distribution
PPTX
Task 3 presentation
PPTX
Film studio research new
PPTX
Evaluation Question 3
PPTX
What media institution will distribute my
PPTX
PPTX
Evaluation Question 3
Q3) WHAT KIND OF MEDIA INSTITUTION MIGHT DISTRIBUTE YOUR MEDIA PRODUCT AND WHY?
Media evalutaions Q3
Question 3
Question 3
Evaluation task
Presentation1
Question 3
Media 3
EVALUATION QUESTION THREE
Evaluation Question 3
Institutional research
Question 3
Question 3
Distribution
Task 3 presentation
Film studio research new
Evaluation Question 3
What media institution will distribute my
Evaluation Question 3

More from Toni Hendry (10)

PPT
A2 evaluation UPDATED
PPT
a2 eval 2
PPTX
Branding questionnaire results
PPT
Album Covers and Branding
PPT
Chocolate video analysis
PPT
Music Video Theories
PPTX
Evaluation #5 UPDATED
PPTX
Evaluation #5
PPT
Bbfc guidelines
PPT
Conventions of a title sequence
A2 evaluation UPDATED
a2 eval 2
Branding questionnaire results
Album Covers and Branding
Chocolate video analysis
Music Video Theories
Evaluation #5 UPDATED
Evaluation #5
Bbfc guidelines
Conventions of a title sequence

Recently uploaded (20)

DOC
学历学位硕士ACAP毕业证,澳大利亚凯斯林大学毕业证留学未毕业
PPTX
PPT ARIEZ'S TOUR FINAL Pulogebang on.pptx
PPTX
examinophobia;how does it occur and how to solve
PDF
The Top Life Coach in Haarlem is Life Coach Rudolfo.pdf
PDF
PrayerPetals- Empowering Women Through Faith-Based Support.pdf
PPTX
Too Lucky to Be a Victim., an essay on social media
PDF
Jake Seal Top 5 Career Milestones in the Film Industry.pdf
PPTX
Benefits of Red Cyan Glasses - rdoptical.com.pptx
PDF
5 Popular Designs of Kashmir Silk Handmade Carpets.pdf
PPTX
hhhsyysvwvsydxuguduehshsvdhvdjbuwbjwjdbwubs
PPTX
Term review 2023 Hirata TYPHOON.pptx review
PDF
Renovating a Midwest Ranch Rustic Modern Charm with Carved Doors
PPTX
Role, role conflict and ascribed and achieved role.pptx
PDF
Maslow's Hierarchy Isn't a Ladder — It's a Loop (by Meenakshi Khakat)
PDF
Pranotsava Monsoon Retreat - Fazlani Nature's Nest
PPTX
GEE2-BEED-II: Ibaloi Indigenous People .pptx
PDF
Economic and Financial Abuse - Hidden Tools of Power in Domestic Violence
PPTX
Hyperlipidemia current medication with lifestyle.
PDF
4 Mindset Shifts to Turn Frustration into Focus
PDF
Pink Lined Illustration Communication Training Talking Presentation_20250804_...
学历学位硕士ACAP毕业证,澳大利亚凯斯林大学毕业证留学未毕业
PPT ARIEZ'S TOUR FINAL Pulogebang on.pptx
examinophobia;how does it occur and how to solve
The Top Life Coach in Haarlem is Life Coach Rudolfo.pdf
PrayerPetals- Empowering Women Through Faith-Based Support.pdf
Too Lucky to Be a Victim., an essay on social media
Jake Seal Top 5 Career Milestones in the Film Industry.pdf
Benefits of Red Cyan Glasses - rdoptical.com.pptx
5 Popular Designs of Kashmir Silk Handmade Carpets.pdf
hhhsyysvwvsydxuguduehshsvdhvdjbuwbjwjdbwubs
Term review 2023 Hirata TYPHOON.pptx review
Renovating a Midwest Ranch Rustic Modern Charm with Carved Doors
Role, role conflict and ascribed and achieved role.pptx
Maslow's Hierarchy Isn't a Ladder — It's a Loop (by Meenakshi Khakat)
Pranotsava Monsoon Retreat - Fazlani Nature's Nest
GEE2-BEED-II: Ibaloi Indigenous People .pptx
Economic and Financial Abuse - Hidden Tools of Power in Domestic Violence
Hyperlipidemia current medication with lifestyle.
4 Mindset Shifts to Turn Frustration into Focus
Pink Lined Illustration Communication Training Talking Presentation_20250804_...

Evaluation #3 UPDATED

  • 1. What kind of institution would distribute your product and why?
  • 2. Different Distributors  When I researched different films of my chosen genre, there was an array of different companies.
  • 3.  I chose Universal as my distributor as 20th Century Fox was more related to the science-fiction sub genre of apocalyptic films, whereas Universal has created horror films. In the past 5 years they have created very successful horror films (The Wolfman, Devil, The Thing, Mama) as well as apocalyptic, dystopian films (The Purge, The Purge :Anarchy, Doomsday, Dawn of the Dead). It seems there was a gap in the market of this genre from Universal as there hasn’t been a dystopian horror film as of recently which was another reason why I chose to use this distributor.  Even their ideology is bringing films to life, using an array of different subsidiary companies in the development, production and distribution process.  They have also had success in 2014 in terms of film, earning $861 million from the top 100 films only. This means that they are a successful company who would be suitable to distribute my product.
  • 4.  I also chose Lionsgate as, despite being a new contender in the film industry – making it’s first debut in 1997- they have had economic success in the global market within the past 5 years. One of their most famous franchise is The Hunger Games (dystopian, sci-fi), earning over $2.3 billion from the first three films alone. Since then, they have increasingly rose to fame, continuing on to distribute the Divergent franchise, overall winning the company 20 Academy Awards. Again, the reason why I chose Lionsgate was because of their success, as they are the ideal company alongside Universal to combine together in a synergetic way to distribute my product as they are both economically successful and well known in the film industry.
  • 5.  I used both Universal and Lionsgate logos at the beginning of my piece so that the audience knows of the production and distribution team involved in my piece. I didn’t include my own logos as Universal and Lionsgate are well known Hollywood companies and when the audience sees their logos, it is instantly recognisable.  I included their idents alongside their music as well so that the audience can recognise the company by their scoring and music even before the logo has fully appeared. Again this is because they are instantly recognisable, allowing the audience to make the connection of the two companies when their logos appear. If they know of film history it can allow their expectations to increase as they know that what they’re watching is of a good standard based on their knowledge of the companies’ previous products they have distributed.
  • 6. Production & Distribution  Typically Universal would either producer and distribute their films or hand over distribution rights to small subsidiary companies (Working Title, Focus Features) from different parts of the world in order to reach the full global market, increasing their profits and revenue.  Lionsgate works in a similar way and in the past recent years, they have produced and distributed their own films on account of their increasing revenue from recent movie successes.  Because they distribute their own products, this can save money and as they are conglomerates, all the profit stays within the production cycle, gaining more profit which can be put towards budgets of new films instead of sharing the profits between lots of different subsidaries. As Lionsgate and Universal are working together, the profits would be split halfway.
  • 7. Exhibition  Cinemas fall into 1 of 2 categories: national chains; and independent exhibitors. The specific programming will depend on the target audience, with large chains often filling their multiplexes with blockbusters and individual independents more likely to cater to art-house crowds.  Lionsgate and Universal both exhibit their films in national chains to increase admissions and reach as many of their target audience as they can as they both distribute blockbusters rather than artistic films.  My piece would be exhibited in a national chain cinema to increase revenue, audience admissions and it is more easily accessible to my target audience as Odeon has over 120 chains in the UK as well as Cineworld with 82. This means that location wise, everyone has access to see my product whereas there are less art-house based theatres.
  • 8. Sites Used  Imdb.com  Wikipedia.com  Boxofficemojo.com