SlideShare a Scribd company logo
ASSIGNMENT #A 629
COURSE: 50121622 (Media Laws and Ethics)
TOPIC: Explain with suitable example ‘Exceptions
for IPC Section 499.’
Roll No: 489
Section 499. Defamation
Whoever, by words wither spoken or intended to be read, or by
signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes any
imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or
having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the
reputation of such person, is said, except I the cases hereinafter
expected, to defame that person.
Explanation 1
It may amount to defamation to impute anything to a deceased
person, if the imputation would harm the reputation of that person if
living, and is intended to be hurtful to the feelings of his family or
other near relatives.
Explanation 2
It may amount to defamation to make an imputation concerning a
company or an association or collection of persons as such.
Explanation 3
An imputation in the form of an alternative or expressed ironically
may amount to defamation.
Explanation 4
No imputation is said to harm a person’s reputation, unless that
imputation directly or indirectly, in the estimation of others, lowers
the morals or intellectual character of that person, or causes it to be
believed that the body of that person is in a loathsome state, or in a
state generally considered as disgraceful.
Illustrations
(a) A says—“Z is an honest man; he never stole B’s watch”;
in­tending to cause it to be believed that Z did steal B’s watch. This
is defamation, unless it falls within one of the exceptions.
(b) A is asked who stole B’s watch. A points to Z, intending to cause
it to be believed that Z stole B’s watch. This is defama­tion unless it
falls within one of the exceptions.
(c) A draws a picture of Z running away with B’s watch, intending it
to be believed that Z stole B’s watch. This is defamation, unless it
falls within one of the exceptions.
First Exception
Imputation of truth which public good requires to be made or
published. —It is not defamation to impute anything, which is true
concerning any person, if it be for the public good that the
imputation should be made or published. Whether or not it is for the
public good is a question of fact.
Second Exception
Public conduct of public servants.—It is not defamation to express
in a good faith any opinion whatever re-specting the conduct of a
public servant in the discharge of his public functions, or respecting
his character, so far as his character appears in that conduct, and no
further.
Third Exception
Conduct of any person touching any public question.—It is not
defamation to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting
the conduct of any person touching any public question, and
respecting his character, so far as his character appears in that
conduct, and no further.
Illustrations
It is not defamation in A to express in good faith any opinion
whatever respecting Z’s conduct in petitioning Government on a
public question, in signing a requisition for a meeting on a public
question, in presiding or attending a such meeting, in forming or
joining any society which invites the public support, in voting or
canvassing for a particular candidate for any situa-tion in the
efficient discharges of the duties of which the public is interested.
Fourth Exception
Publication of reports of proceedings of Courts.—It is not
defamation to publish substantially true report of the proceedings of
a Court of Justice, or of the result of any such proceedings.
Explanation
A Justice of the Peace or other officer holding an inquiry in open
Court preliminary to a trial in a Court of Jus-tice, is a Court within
the meaning of the above section.
Fifth Exception
Merits of case decided in Court or conduct of witnesses and others
concerned.—It is not defamation to express in good faith any
opinion whatever respecting the merits of any case, civil or criminal,
which has been decided by a Court of Justice, or respecting the
conduct of any person as a party, witness or agent, in any such case,
or respecting the character of such person, as far as his character
appears in that conduct, and no further.
Illustrations
(a) A says—“I think Z’s evidence on that trial is so contradic­tory
that he must be stupid or dishonest”. A is within this exception if he
says this is in good faith, in as much as the opin-ion which he
expresses respects Z’s character as it appears in Z’s conduct as a
witness, and no further.
(b) But if A says—“I do not believe what Z asserted at that trial
because I know him to be a man without veracity”; A is not within
this exception, in as much as the opinion which he express of Z’s
character, is an opinion not founded on Z’s conduct as a witness.
Sixth Exception.—Merits of public performance.—It is not
defa-mation to express in good faith any opinion respecting the
merits of any performance which its author has submitted to the
judgment of the public, or respecting the character of the author so
far as his character appears in such performance, and no further.
Explanation
A performance may be submitted to the judgment of the public
expressly or by acts on the part of the author which imply such
submission to the judgment of the public.
Illustrations
(a) A person who publishes a book, submits that book to the
judgment of the public.
(b) A person who makes a speech in public, submits that speech to
the judgment of the public.
(c) An actor or singer who appears on a public stage, submits his
acting or signing in the judgment of the public.
(d) A says of a book published by Z—“Z’s book is foolish; Z must
be a weak man. Z’s book is indecent; Z must be a man of impure
mind”. A is within the exception, if he says this in good faith, in as
much as the opinion which he expresses of Z respects Z’s character
only so far as it appears in Z’s book, and no further.
(e) But if A says—“I am not surprised that Z’s book is foolish and
indecent, for he is a weak man and a libertine”. A is not within this
exception, in as much as the opinion which he expresses of Z’s
character is an opinion not founded on Z’s book.
Seventh Exception
Censure passed in good faith by person having lawful authority over
another.—It is not defamation in a person having over another any
authority, either conferred by law or arising out of a lawful contract
made with that other, to pass in good faith any censure on the
conduct of that other in matters to which such lawful authority
relates.
Illustrations
A Judge censuring in good faith the conduct of a witness, or of an
officer of the Court; a head of a department censuring in good faith
those who are under his orders; a parent censuring in good faith a
child in the presence of other children; a school-master, whose
authority is derived from a parent, censuring in good faith a pupil in
the presence of other pupils; a master censuring a servant in good
faith for remissness in service; a banker censur-ing in good faith the
cashier of his bank for the conduct of such cashier as such cashier—
are within this exception.
Eighth Exception
Accusation preferred in good faith to authorized person.—It is not
defamation to prefer in good faith an accusation against any person
to any of those who have lawful authority over that person with
respect to the subject-matter of accusation.
Illustrations
If A in good faith accuse Z before a Magistrate; if A in good faith
complains of the conduct of Z, a servant, to Z’s master; if A in good
faith complains of the conduct of Z, and child, to Z’s father—A is
within this exception.
Ninth Exception
Imputation made in good faith by person for protection of his or
other’s interests.—It is not defamation to make an imputation on the
character of another provided that the imputation be made in good
faith for the protection of the inter-ests of the person making it, or of
any other person, or for the public good.
Illustrations
(a) A, a shopkeeper, says to B, who manages his business—“Sell
nothing to Z unless he pays you ready money, for I have no opin-ion
of his honesty”. A is within the exception, if he has made this
imputation on Z in good faith for the protection of his own interests.
(b) A, a Magistrate, in making a report of his own superior offi-cer,
casts an imputation on the character of Z. Here, if the imputation is
made in good faith, and for the public good, A is within the
exception.
Tenth Exception
Caution intended for good of person to whom conveyed or for
public good.—It is not defamation to convey a caution, in good
faith, to one person against another, provided that such caution be
intended for the good of the person to whom it is conveyed, or of
some person in whom that person is inter-ested, or for the public
good.

More Related Content

PPTX
Pleadings in Civil Procedure Code.pptx
PPTX
Section 9 of Code of Civil procedure,1908-jurisdiction of Civil Court
PDF
Code of civil procedure 1908 parties to suit
PDF
Civil procedure code, 1908 { place of institution of suits }
DOCX
Appeal And Revision
PPT
Burden of proof ppt
DOCX
PPT
law relating to temporary injunction in india
Pleadings in Civil Procedure Code.pptx
Section 9 of Code of Civil procedure,1908-jurisdiction of Civil Court
Code of civil procedure 1908 parties to suit
Civil procedure code, 1908 { place of institution of suits }
Appeal And Revision
Burden of proof ppt
law relating to temporary injunction in india

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Limitation act,1963
PPTX
Suits filed by Aliens, by or against Foreign Rulers and Ambassadors
PPTX
DECREE- CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE (ALL ABOUT DECREE)
PPT
ADR - 5TH MAY - Cpt. BHATIA (F) - 5th LECTURE
PPTX
RES JUDICATA
PDF
Code of civil procedure 1908 reference, review, revision
PPT
PPT
Trial of-summon-cases-by-magistrate
PDF
Section 34 of the Arbitrationand Conciliation Act. Scope of interference. Po...
PDF
Pleadings and its essentials
PPTX
Crpc sec 164
PPTX
Crpc sec 162
PPTX
Interpretation of statutes
PPSX
Precedent
PPTX
Indigent person
PPT
Equitable doctrines
PPTX
Examination of Witness.pptx
PDF
TPA Notes In English@lawforcivilservices.pdf
PDF
Code of civil procedure 1908 jurisdiction of civil courts
PPTX
O. XXXIX Temporary injunctions and interlocutory orders of CPC,1908
Limitation act,1963
Suits filed by Aliens, by or against Foreign Rulers and Ambassadors
DECREE- CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE (ALL ABOUT DECREE)
ADR - 5TH MAY - Cpt. BHATIA (F) - 5th LECTURE
RES JUDICATA
Code of civil procedure 1908 reference, review, revision
Trial of-summon-cases-by-magistrate
Section 34 of the Arbitrationand Conciliation Act. Scope of interference. Po...
Pleadings and its essentials
Crpc sec 164
Crpc sec 162
Interpretation of statutes
Precedent
Indigent person
Equitable doctrines
Examination of Witness.pptx
TPA Notes In English@lawforcivilservices.pdf
Code of civil procedure 1908 jurisdiction of civil courts
O. XXXIX Temporary injunctions and interlocutory orders of CPC,1908
Ad

Similar to ‘Exceptions for IPC section 499.’ (20)

PPTX
Defamation ritesh chaudhary
PDF
RTI - UNIT IV-converted.pdf
PDF
Criminal defamation
DOCX
S chapter 4 defamation fall 2020the first amendment
PDF
7-8_Tort of Defamation & Media great1.pdf
PPTX
Defamation Law in India
PPTX
Criminal defamation
PPTX
Defamation.pptx
PPTX
Crimes against civil status
PPTX
Aids of interpretation
PPTX
defamation.pptx
PDF
Lawweb.in latest supreme court judgment on defamation
PPTX
Online Defamation
PPT
Intentional Tort
PPT
Nurses and crimes
PDF
Diffrences
PDF
Diffrences
PPTX
Defences to defamation
PPTX
Law of defamation
DOCX
Douglas E. Metzger was convicted in the municipal court of the cit.docx
Defamation ritesh chaudhary
RTI - UNIT IV-converted.pdf
Criminal defamation
S chapter 4 defamation fall 2020the first amendment
7-8_Tort of Defamation & Media great1.pdf
Defamation Law in India
Criminal defamation
Defamation.pptx
Crimes against civil status
Aids of interpretation
defamation.pptx
Lawweb.in latest supreme court judgment on defamation
Online Defamation
Intentional Tort
Nurses and crimes
Diffrences
Diffrences
Defences to defamation
Law of defamation
Douglas E. Metzger was convicted in the municipal court of the cit.docx
Ad

More from Vaishnavi Meghe (8)

DOCX
Ethics, norms, values and beliefs and kohlberg's theory of ethical judgment
PPTX
Mc donalds india
PPTX
Case study on kuwait
DOCX
Information & technology Act, 2000.
DOCX
Red bull stratos campaign
PPTX
STP of sunfeast biscuits
DOCX
Comparative study between Homer and Valmiki
DOCX
Evil of dowry
Ethics, norms, values and beliefs and kohlberg's theory of ethical judgment
Mc donalds india
Case study on kuwait
Information & technology Act, 2000.
Red bull stratos campaign
STP of sunfeast biscuits
Comparative study between Homer and Valmiki
Evil of dowry

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Court PROCESS Notes_Law Clinic Notes.pptx
PPTX
PA2014 for Employer and employee at workplace
PPTX
Evolution of First Amendment Jurisprudence.pptx
PPTX
Behavioural_Approach_Public_Administration_Zambia_USA.pptx
PDF
The AI & LegalTech Surge Reshaping the Indian Legal Landscape
PPTX
lecture 5.pptx on family law notes well detailed
PPTX
Basic key concepts of law by Shivam Dhawal
PDF
NRL_Legal Regulation of Forests and Wildlife.pdf
PDF
The Transformative Journey of Healthcare_ Progress and Challenges Ahead by Ga...
PDF
devolution-handbook (1).pdf the growh of devolution from 2010
PPTX
Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act
PDF
Palghar-SGupta-ScreesnShots-12Aug25.pdf The image of the voter list with phot...
PDF
APPELLANT'S AMENDED BRIEF – DPW ENTERPRISES LLC & MOUNTAIN PRIME 2018 LLC v. ...
PPTX
PPT in Consti 2 Report (Week1).pptx under the contituiton
PDF
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Amendment Bill 2025
PPTX
Indian Medical Device Rules or Institute of Management Development and Research
PPTX
DepEd 4A Gender Issues and Promoting Gender Equality.pptx
PPT
2025 KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY LECTURE.ppt
PDF
AI in Modern Warfare and Business Ethics Ortynska Law Ventures Cafe.pdf
PDF
OBLICON (Civil Law of the Philippines) Obligations and Contracts
Court PROCESS Notes_Law Clinic Notes.pptx
PA2014 for Employer and employee at workplace
Evolution of First Amendment Jurisprudence.pptx
Behavioural_Approach_Public_Administration_Zambia_USA.pptx
The AI & LegalTech Surge Reshaping the Indian Legal Landscape
lecture 5.pptx on family law notes well detailed
Basic key concepts of law by Shivam Dhawal
NRL_Legal Regulation of Forests and Wildlife.pdf
The Transformative Journey of Healthcare_ Progress and Challenges Ahead by Ga...
devolution-handbook (1).pdf the growh of devolution from 2010
Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act
Palghar-SGupta-ScreesnShots-12Aug25.pdf The image of the voter list with phot...
APPELLANT'S AMENDED BRIEF – DPW ENTERPRISES LLC & MOUNTAIN PRIME 2018 LLC v. ...
PPT in Consti 2 Report (Week1).pptx under the contituiton
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Amendment Bill 2025
Indian Medical Device Rules or Institute of Management Development and Research
DepEd 4A Gender Issues and Promoting Gender Equality.pptx
2025 KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY LECTURE.ppt
AI in Modern Warfare and Business Ethics Ortynska Law Ventures Cafe.pdf
OBLICON (Civil Law of the Philippines) Obligations and Contracts

‘Exceptions for IPC section 499.’

  • 1. ASSIGNMENT #A 629 COURSE: 50121622 (Media Laws and Ethics) TOPIC: Explain with suitable example ‘Exceptions for IPC Section 499.’ Roll No: 489
  • 2. Section 499. Defamation Whoever, by words wither spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said, except I the cases hereinafter expected, to defame that person. Explanation 1 It may amount to defamation to impute anything to a deceased person, if the imputation would harm the reputation of that person if living, and is intended to be hurtful to the feelings of his family or other near relatives. Explanation 2 It may amount to defamation to make an imputation concerning a company or an association or collection of persons as such. Explanation 3 An imputation in the form of an alternative or expressed ironically may amount to defamation. Explanation 4 No imputation is said to harm a person’s reputation, unless that imputation directly or indirectly, in the estimation of others, lowers the morals or intellectual character of that person, or causes it to be believed that the body of that person is in a loathsome state, or in a state generally considered as disgraceful.
  • 3. Illustrations (a) A says—“Z is an honest man; he never stole B’s watch”; in­tending to cause it to be believed that Z did steal B’s watch. This is defamation, unless it falls within one of the exceptions. (b) A is asked who stole B’s watch. A points to Z, intending to cause it to be believed that Z stole B’s watch. This is defama­tion unless it falls within one of the exceptions. (c) A draws a picture of Z running away with B’s watch, intending it to be believed that Z stole B’s watch. This is defamation, unless it falls within one of the exceptions. First Exception Imputation of truth which public good requires to be made or published. —It is not defamation to impute anything, which is true concerning any person, if it be for the public good that the imputation should be made or published. Whether or not it is for the public good is a question of fact. Second Exception Public conduct of public servants.—It is not defamation to express in a good faith any opinion whatever re-specting the conduct of a public servant in the discharge of his public functions, or respecting his character, so far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further.
  • 4. Third Exception Conduct of any person touching any public question.—It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting the conduct of any person touching any public question, and respecting his character, so far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further. Illustrations It is not defamation in A to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting Z’s conduct in petitioning Government on a public question, in signing a requisition for a meeting on a public question, in presiding or attending a such meeting, in forming or joining any society which invites the public support, in voting or canvassing for a particular candidate for any situa-tion in the efficient discharges of the duties of which the public is interested. Fourth Exception Publication of reports of proceedings of Courts.—It is not defamation to publish substantially true report of the proceedings of a Court of Justice, or of the result of any such proceedings. Explanation A Justice of the Peace or other officer holding an inquiry in open Court preliminary to a trial in a Court of Jus-tice, is a Court within the meaning of the above section.
  • 5. Fifth Exception Merits of case decided in Court or conduct of witnesses and others concerned.—It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting the merits of any case, civil or criminal, which has been decided by a Court of Justice, or respecting the conduct of any person as a party, witness or agent, in any such case, or respecting the character of such person, as far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further. Illustrations (a) A says—“I think Z’s evidence on that trial is so contradic­tory that he must be stupid or dishonest”. A is within this exception if he says this is in good faith, in as much as the opin-ion which he expresses respects Z’s character as it appears in Z’s conduct as a witness, and no further. (b) But if A says—“I do not believe what Z asserted at that trial because I know him to be a man without veracity”; A is not within this exception, in as much as the opinion which he express of Z’s character, is an opinion not founded on Z’s conduct as a witness. Sixth Exception.—Merits of public performance.—It is not defa-mation to express in good faith any opinion respecting the merits of any performance which its author has submitted to the judgment of the public, or respecting the character of the author so far as his character appears in such performance, and no further. Explanation
  • 6. A performance may be submitted to the judgment of the public expressly or by acts on the part of the author which imply such submission to the judgment of the public. Illustrations (a) A person who publishes a book, submits that book to the judgment of the public. (b) A person who makes a speech in public, submits that speech to the judgment of the public. (c) An actor or singer who appears on a public stage, submits his acting or signing in the judgment of the public. (d) A says of a book published by Z—“Z’s book is foolish; Z must be a weak man. Z’s book is indecent; Z must be a man of impure mind”. A is within the exception, if he says this in good faith, in as much as the opinion which he expresses of Z respects Z’s character only so far as it appears in Z’s book, and no further. (e) But if A says—“I am not surprised that Z’s book is foolish and indecent, for he is a weak man and a libertine”. A is not within this exception, in as much as the opinion which he expresses of Z’s character is an opinion not founded on Z’s book. Seventh Exception Censure passed in good faith by person having lawful authority over another.—It is not defamation in a person having over another any authority, either conferred by law or arising out of a lawful contract made with that other, to pass in good faith any censure on the conduct of that other in matters to which such lawful authority relates.
  • 7. Illustrations A Judge censuring in good faith the conduct of a witness, or of an officer of the Court; a head of a department censuring in good faith those who are under his orders; a parent censuring in good faith a child in the presence of other children; a school-master, whose authority is derived from a parent, censuring in good faith a pupil in the presence of other pupils; a master censuring a servant in good faith for remissness in service; a banker censur-ing in good faith the cashier of his bank for the conduct of such cashier as such cashier— are within this exception. Eighth Exception Accusation preferred in good faith to authorized person.—It is not defamation to prefer in good faith an accusation against any person to any of those who have lawful authority over that person with respect to the subject-matter of accusation. Illustrations If A in good faith accuse Z before a Magistrate; if A in good faith complains of the conduct of Z, a servant, to Z’s master; if A in good faith complains of the conduct of Z, and child, to Z’s father—A is within this exception. Ninth Exception Imputation made in good faith by person for protection of his or other’s interests.—It is not defamation to make an imputation on the character of another provided that the imputation be made in good faith for the protection of the inter-ests of the person making it, or of any other person, or for the public good.
  • 8. Illustrations (a) A, a shopkeeper, says to B, who manages his business—“Sell nothing to Z unless he pays you ready money, for I have no opin-ion of his honesty”. A is within the exception, if he has made this imputation on Z in good faith for the protection of his own interests. (b) A, a Magistrate, in making a report of his own superior offi-cer, casts an imputation on the character of Z. Here, if the imputation is made in good faith, and for the public good, A is within the exception. Tenth Exception Caution intended for good of person to whom conveyed or for public good.—It is not defamation to convey a caution, in good faith, to one person against another, provided that such caution be intended for the good of the person to whom it is conveyed, or of some person in whom that person is inter-ested, or for the public good.