Exploring new mobile and cloud platforms without a governance .docx

Exploring new mobile and cloud platforms without a
governance strategy can
have consequences.
At the beginning of my IT career, I witnessed a number of
decisions and project management practices which, at the
time, just didn't seem to make sense. But I was young, and I
often thought to myself that the people involved must have
some other reasoning, some justification for their actions that I
was just not privy to.
In short, I remained quiet when I should have spoken up. What
two decades of experience has taught me is that there
is rarely reasoning or justification behind actions that, at a gut-
level, are clearly bad IT practices. We inherently
recognize when common sense has taken a back seat.
There is most definitely a dark side to BYOD. For the most
part, I am an advocate for the consumerization of IT (using
non-standard apps and tools as a way to increase end user
engagement and productivity) and support the bring-your-
own-device model.
However, as a seasoned manager and IT operations leader, I
recognize the risks that come with the model if

organizations do not properly plan out their strategies, putting
sufficient protections and governance practices in place
to manage the potential risks that could come from these
unsupported devices and applications. End users often want
what’s NEW, but there are valid reasons for imposing and
enforcing safeguards when giving mobile business users
access to your otherwise secure, scalable, and compliant
systems.
Some people equate governance with bureaucracy and
hierarchical systems, but those perceptions often come from a
lack of appreciation for the potential risks involved.
Governance is about checks and balances -- supporting the tools
and systems your end users want, but in a way that is
manageable and which follows defined protocols.
Examples of rogue IT practices
A (http://harmon.ie/blog/new-survey-reveals-mobile-rogue-it-
costing-us-organizations-almost-2b)recent uSamp survey
(http://harmon.ie/blog/new-survey-reveals-mobile-rogue-it-
costing-us-organizations-almost-2b) found that 41% of US
mobile business
users have used unsanctioned services to share or sync files,
despite 87% saying they are aware that their company
has a document sharing policy that prohibits this practice. And,
27% of mobile business users who “went rogue”,

reported immediate and direct repercussions, from lost business
to expensive lawsuits and financial penalties that cost
$2 billion.
While most IT professionals understand these risks viscerally,
some business users need to crash and burn before
they are willing to adjust their risky behaviors, which is not a
message your employer wants to hear. Luckily, there is
another way: learning from the mistakes of others. This month,
I am one of six mobile security and IT experts judging a
(http://www.rogueitstories.com/)"Rogue IT" contest
(http://www.rogueitstories.com/). We’re collecting anonymous
stories from the
community about mobile and cloud-based app failures caused by
business and IT users who disregard corporate
BYOD AND THE CONSUMERIZATION OF IT
The dark side of BYOD
By Guest Contributor in Tech Decision Maker, October 13,
2013, 5:00 PM PST
Page 1 of 5The dark side of BYOD - TechRepublic
1/30/2014http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/tech-decision-
maker/the-dark-side-of-byod/
governance practices. These real-world horror stories are great

examples of the prevalence of rogue IT behaviors at
work, and the very real risks they bring.
For example, within a $500 million health and wellness
company, a consultant was hired to audit their IT systems to
ensure their systems and practices were compliant with industry
regulations and best practices. It was very quickly
identified that end users were sharing sensitive customer data
(credit card numbers, bank routing numbers) using
public email channels (Hotmail, Gmail) and through consumer
instant messaging platforms (AOL Messenger, Yahoo
Messenger, MSN Messenger), despite approved and documented
communications processes.
Because the consultant was required to report the violations, the
CFO immediately took steps to lock down all
unauthorized collaboration tools, and instituted immediate
policy changes. The company was given just days to
comply, with hefty fines for each violation identified plus more
fines for each day their systems were found to be non-
compliant.
In another example, a European company was getting an
increasing number of requests from its users to connect
personal iPads and smartphones to company systems. While IT
resisted these requests for several months, the

company finally decided to open up its email systems to a
“select number of executives” and shared the necessary
passwords. Six weeks later, IT ran an audit on the system and
found ten-times the number of employees connected
into the corporate back end environment as had been approved.
The passwords had apparently been shared across
the organization.
And at a large non-profit, the security team found out that
several teams using Dropbox without IT authorization had
recently been hacked. To understand how their system had been
compromised, they contacted the popular cloud-
storage vendor, telling the person over the phone that they
wanted to know more about how their organization had
been using the platform. The phone rep volunteered more data
than they had expected, telling them "We have a list of
1600 user names and their email addresses. Would you like that
list?" The cloud-storage vendor was clearly interested
in moving to them to the enterprise version, and was willing to
share a customer list without even authenticating the
person who called!
Proactive governance
There are similar traits that run through each of these real-world
examples. For one, individuals subverting established

processes and informed IT leaders with the goal of “getting
work done faster." On the flip side, many IT organizations
are not listening to the needs of their employees, causing some
to feel that they have no other choice but to "go
around" IT so that they can get their jobs accomplished.
In each case, the lack of clearly documented -- and transparent -
- change management practices may be at the root
cause of the problem; practices that provide a more open dialog
between IT and end users about what is needed, and
how some consumer-driven tools and practices may not be the
best fit for an enterprise.
Governance should not be feared or ignored, but looked at by
both management and end users as an important aspect
of the change management model. Organization make
governance and change management a priority are able to
more quickly recognize new requests as they come in, validate
requirements to make sure requests are aligned with
business activities, and ensure that all new tools and apps meet
the standards and regulations, reducing the risks of
data meltdowns and unintentional-but-potentially-significant
losses.

Christian Buckley is the Chief Evangelist at Metalogix. Keep an
eye out here for more coverage from Christian's stint as
judge at the "Rogue IT" contest.
Add your Comment
You Might Have Forgotten
About These 20 Actors We
Lost Too Soon
— Rant Lifestyle
If You've Ever Thought of
Buying an iPad You Need
to Read This
— Life Factopia
Little known way to pay off
mortgage
— Weekly Financial
Solution

Experts Select The Best
Credit Cards of 2014
— Next Advisor
You May Also Like about these links
Editor's Picks
WHITE PAPERS // FROM ARUBA NETWORKS
Aruba Networks - MOVE Architecture - Video
This 2 minute video displays how Mobile Virtual Enterprise
(MOVE) Architecture delivers secure

BYOD and a mobility experience for everyday work.
Watch it here now.
WATCH NOW
WHITE PAPERS // FROM IBM
Security Essentials for CIOs: Enabling Mobility - Their device,
your data
DOWNLOAD NOW
[Research Report] Putting mobile first: best practices of mobile
technology leaders
DOWNLOAD NOW
The flexible workplace: Unlocking value in the "bring your own
device" era

DOWNLOAD NOW
The big data question to
ask about every project
10 things you should
know about Google
Now
Internet of Things
botnet may include TVs
and a fridge
Bodhi Linux could
become a desktop
distribution contender

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads
Don't Miss Our Latest Updates
See what best practices for SMBs are emerging. Visit ZDNet
today!
Editor's Daily Picks
Week in Review
IT Buying Cycle Learn more
Discover Investigate Compare Justify Optimize
Reality check for Obama's six proposed tech hubs: Job growth
not immediate

IT Employment // January 29, 2014, 1:42 PM PST
Malicious intent can turn Chrome speech recognition into
spying device
Security // January 29, 2014, 11:43 AM PST
Welcome Matt Asay, TechRepublic's newest enterprise
columnist
Open Source // January 29, 2014, 10:31 AM PST
Resource Center
Useful content from our premier sponsors
CHAPTER 3

Creating New Social Orders:
Colonial Societies, 1500–1700
Figure 3.1 John Smith’s famous map of Virginia (1622)
illustrates many geopolitical features of early colonization. In
the upper left, Powhatan, who governed a powerful local
confederation of Algonquian communities, sits above other
local chiefs, denoting his authority. Another native figure,
Susquehannock, who appears in the upper right, visually
reinforces the message that the English did not control the land
beyond a few outposts along the Chesapeake.
Chapter Outline
3.1 Spanish Exploration and Colonial Society
3.2 Colonial Rivalries: Dutch and French Colonial Ambitions
3.3 English Settlements in America
3.4 The Impact of Colonization
Introduction
By the mid-seventeenth century, the geopolitical map of North
America had become a patchwork of
imperial designs and ambitions as the Spanish, Dutch, French,
and English reinforced their claims to
parts of the land. Uneasiness, punctuated by violent clashes,
prevailed in the border zones between the

Europeans’ territorial claims. Meanwhile, still-powerful native
peoples waged war to drive the invaders
from the continent. In the Chesapeake Bay and New England
colonies, conflicts erupted as the English
pushed against their native neighbors (Figure 3.1).
The rise of colonial societies in the Americas brought Native
Americans, Africans, and Europeans together
for the first time, highlighting the radical social, cultural, and
religious differences that hampered their
ability to understand each other. European settlement affected
every aspect of the land and its people,
bringing goods, ideas, and diseases that transformed the
Americas. Reciprocally, Native American
practices, such as the use of tobacco, profoundly altered
European habits and tastes.
Chapter 3 Creating New Social Orders: Colonial Societies,
1500–1700 69
By the end of this section, you will be able to:

• Identify the main Spanish American colonial settlements of
the 1500s and 1600s
• Discuss economic, political, and demographic similarities and
differences between the
Spanish colonies
During the 1500s, Spain expanded its colonial empire to the
Philippines in the Far East and to areas in
the Americas that later became the United States. The Spanish
dreamed of mountains of gold and silver
and imagined converting thousands of eager Indians to
Catholicism. In their vision of colonial society,
everyone would know his or her place. Patriarchy (the rule of
men over family, society, and government)
shaped the Spanish colonial world. Women occupied a lower
status. In all matters, the Spanish held
themselves to be atop the social pyramid, with native peoples
and Africans beneath them. Both Africans
and native peoples, however, contested Spanish claims to
dominance. Everywhere the Spanish settled,
they brought devastating diseases, such as smallpox, that led to
a horrific loss of life among native peoples.
European diseases killed far more native inhabitants than did
Spanish swords.

The world native peoples had known before the coming of the
Spanish was further upset by Spanish
colonial practices. The Spanish imposed the encomienda system
in the areas they controlled. Under this
system, authorities assigned Indian workers to mine and
plantation owners with the understanding that
the recipients would defend the colony and teach the workers
the tenets of Christianity. In reality, the
encomienda system exploited native workers. It was eventually
replaced by another colonial labor system,
the repartimiento, which required Indian towns to supply a pool
of labor for Spanish overlords.
ST. AUGUSTINE, FLORIDA
Spain gained a foothold in present-day Florida, viewing that
area and the lands to the north as a logical
extension of their Caribbean empire. In 1513, Juan Ponce de
León had claimed the area around today’s
St. Augustine for the Spanish crown, naming the land Pascua
Florida (Feast of Flowers, or Easter) for the
nearest feast day. Ponce de León was unable to establish a
permanent settlement there, but by 1565, Spain
was in need of an outpost to confront the French and English
privateers using Florida as a base from which

Figure 3.2
70 Chapter 3 Creating New Social Orders: Colonial Societies,
1500–1700
This content is available for free at
http://legacy.cnx.org/content/col11740/1.3
to attack treasure-laden Spanish ships heading from Cuba to
Spain. The threat to Spanish interests took
a new turn in 1562 when a group of French Protestants
(Huguenots) established a small settlement they
called Fort Caroline, north of St. Augustine. With the
authorization of King Philip II, Spanish nobleman
Pedro Menéndez led an attack on Fort Caroline, killing most of
the colonists and destroying the fort.
Eliminating Fort Caroline served dual purposes for the
Spanish—it helped reduce the danger from French
privateers and eradicated the French threat to Spain’s claim to
the area. The contest over Florida illustrates
how European rivalries spilled over into the Americas,
especially religious conflict between Catholics and

Protestants.
In 1565, the victorious Menéndez founded St. Augustine, now
the oldest European settlement in the
Americas. In the process, the Spanish displaced the local
Timucua Indians from their ancient town of
Seloy, which had stood for thousands of years (Figure 3.3). The
Timucua suffered greatly from diseases
introduced by the Spanish, shrinking from a population of
around 200,000 pre-contact to fifty thousand
in 1590. By 1700, only one thousand Timucua remained. As in
other areas of Spanish conquest, Catholic
priests worked to bring about a spiritual conquest by forcing the
surviving Timucua, demoralized and
reeling from catastrophic losses of family and community, to
convert to Catholicism.
Figure 3.3 In this drawing by French artist Jacques le Moyne de
Morgues, Timucua flee the Spanish settlers, who
arrive by ship. Le Moyne lived at Fort Caroline, the French
outpost, before the Spanish destroyed the colony in 1562.
Spanish Florida made an inviting target for Spain’s imperial
rivals, especially the English, who wanted to
gain access to the Caribbean. In 1586, Spanish settlers in St.

Augustine discovered their vulnerability to
attack when the English pirate Sir Francis Drake destroyed the
town with a fleet of twenty ships and one
hundred men. Over the next several decades, the Spanish built
more wooden forts, all of which were burnt
by raiding European rivals. Between 1672 and 1695, the
Spanish constructed a stone fort, Castillo de San
Marcos (Figure 3.4), to better defend St. Augustine against
challengers.
1500–1700 71
Figure 3.4 The Spanish fort of Castillo de San Marcos helped
Spanish colonists in St. Augustine fend off marauding
privateers from rival European countries.
Browse the National Park Service’s multimedia resources on
Castillo de San
Marcos (http://openstaxcollege.org/l/castillo) to see how the
fort and gates have
looked throughout history.

SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO
Further west, the Spanish in Mexico, intent on expanding their
empire, looked north to the land of the
Pueblo Indians. Under orders from King Philip II, Juan de Oñate
explored the American southwest for
Spain in the late 1590s. The Spanish hoped that what we know
as New Mexico would yield gold and silver,
but the land produced little of value to them. In 1610, Spanish
settlers established themselves at Santa
Fe—originally named La Villa Real de la Santa Fe de San
Francisco de Asís, or “Royal City of the Holy
Faith of St. Francis of Assisi”—where many Pueblo villages
were located. Santa Fe became the capital of
the Kingdom of New Mexico, an outpost of the larger Spanish
Viceroyalty of New Spain, which had its
headquarters in Mexico City.
As they had in other Spanish colonies, Franciscan missionaries
labored to bring about a spiritual conquest
by converting the Pueblo to Catholicism. At first, the Pueblo
adopted the parts of Catholicism that
dovetailed with their own long-standing view of the world.
However, Spanish priests insisted that natives
discard their old ways entirely and angered the Pueblo by
focusing on the young, drawing them away

from their parents. This deep insult, combined with an extended
period of drought and increased attacks
by local Apache and Navajo in the 1670s—troubles that the
Pueblo came to believe were linked to the
Spanish presence—moved the Pueblo to push the Spanish and
their religion from the area. Pueblo leader
Popé demanded a return to native ways so the hardships his
people faced would end. To him and
to thousands of others, it seemed obvious that “when Jesus
came, the Corn Mothers went away.” The
expulsion of the Spanish would bring a return to prosperity and
a pure, native way of life.
In 1680, the Pueblo launched a coordinated rebellion against the
Spanish. The Pueblo Revolt killed over
four hundred Spaniards and drove the rest of the settlers,
perhaps as many as two thousand, south toward
Mexico. However, as droughts and attacks by rival tribes
continued, the Spanish sensed an opportunity to
regain their foothold. In 1692, they returned and reasserted their
control of the area. Some of the Spanish
Click and Explore

1500–1700
http://openstaxcollege.org/l/castillo
http://openstaxcollege.org/l/castillo
explained the Pueblo success in 1680 as the work of the Devil.
Satan, they believed, had stirred up the
Pueblo to take arms against God’s chosen people—the
Spanish—but the Spanish, and their God, had
prevailed in the end.
• Compare and contrast the development and character of the
French and Dutch colonies
in North America
• Discuss the economies of the French and Dutch colonies in
North America

Seventeenth-century French and Dutch colonies in North
America were modest in comparison to Spain’s
colossal global empire. New France and New Netherland
remained small commercial operations focused
on the fur trade and did not attract an influx of migrants. The
Dutch in New Netherland confined their
operations to Manhattan Island, Long Island, the Hudson River
Valley, and what later became New Jersey.
Dutch trade goods circulated widely among the native peoples
in these areas and also traveled well into
the interior of the continent along preexisting native trade
routes. French habitants, or farmer-settlers, eked
out an existence along the St. Lawrence River. French fur
traders and missionaries, however, ranged far
into the interior of North America, exploring the Great Lakes
region and the Mississippi River. These
pioneers gave France somewhat inflated imperial claims to
lands that nonetheless remained firmly under
the dominion of native peoples.
FUR TRADING IN NEW NETHERLAND
The Dutch Republic emerged as a major commercial center in
the 1600s. Its fleets plied the waters of the
Atlantic, while other Dutch ships sailed to the Far East,
returning with prized spices like pepper to be

sold in the bustling ports at home, especially Amsterdam. In
North America, Dutch traders established
themselves first on Manhattan Island.
One of the Dutch directors-general of the North American
settlement, Peter Stuyvesant, served from 1647
to 1664 and expanded the fledgling outpost of New Netherland
east to present-day Long Island and for
many miles north along the Hudson River. The resulting
elongated colony served primarily as a fur-
trading post, with the powerful Dutch West India Company
controlling all commerce. Fort Amsterdam, on
the southern tip of Manhattan Island, defended the growing city
of New Amsterdam. In 1655, Stuyvesant
took over the small outpost of New Sweden along the banks of
the Delaware River in present-day New
Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware. He also defended New
Amsterdam from Indian attacks by ordering
African slaves to build a protective wall on the city’s
northeastern border, giving present-day Wall Street
its name (Figure 3.5).
1500–1700 73

Figure 3.5 The Castello Plan is the only extant map of 1660
New Amsterdam (present-day New York City). The line
with spikes on the right side of the colony is the northeastern
wall for which Wall Street was named.
New Netherland failed to attract many Dutch colonists; by 1664,
only nine thousand people were living
there. Conflict with native peoples, as well as dissatisfaction
with the Dutch West India Company’s
trading practices, made the Dutch outpost an undesirable place
for many migrants. The small size of
the population meant a severe labor shortage, and to complete
the arduous tasks of early settlement, the
Dutch West India Company imported some 450 African slaves
between 1626 and 1664. (The company
had involved itself heavily in the slave trade and in 1637
captured Elmina, the slave-trading post on
the west coast of Africa, from the Portuguese.) The shortage of
labor also meant that New Netherland
welcomed non-Dutch immigrants, including Protestants from
Germany, Sweden, Denmark, and England,
and embraced a degree of religious tolerance, allowing Jewish
immigrants to become residents beginning

in the 1650s. Thus, a wide variety of people lived in New
Netherland from the start. Indeed, one observer
claimed eighteen different languages could be heard on the
streets of New Amsterdam. As new settlers
arrived, the colony of New Netherland stretched farther to the
north and the west (Figure 3.6).
1500–1700
Figure 3.6 This 1684 map of New Netherland shows the extent
of Dutch settlement.
The Dutch West India Company found the business of
colonization in New Netherland to be expensive. To
share some of the costs, it granted Dutch merchants who
invested heavily in it patroonships, or large tracts
of land and the right to govern the tenants there. In return, the
shareholder who gained the patroonship
promised to pay for the passage of at least thirty Dutch farmers

to populate the colony. One of the
largest patroonships was granted to Kiliaen van Rensselaer, one
of the directors of the Dutch West India
Company; it covered most of present-day Albany and
Rensselaer Counties. This pattern of settlement
created a yawning gap in wealth and status between the tenants,
who paid rent, and the wealthy patroons.
During the summer trading season, Indians gathered at trading
posts such as the Dutch site at Beverwijck
(present-day Albany), where they exchanged furs for guns,
blankets, and alcohol. The furs, especially
beaver pelts destined for the lucrative European millinery
market, would be sent down the Hudson River
to New Amsterdam. There, slaves or workers would load them
aboard ships bound for Amsterdam.
Explore an interactive map of New Amsterdam in 1660
(http://openstaxcollege.org/l/WNET) that shows the city plan
and the locations of
various structures, including houses, businesses, and public
buildings. Rolling over the
map reveals relevant historical details, such as street names, the
identities of certain
buildings and businesses, and the names of residents of the

houses (when known).
Click and Explore
1500–1700 75
http://openstaxcollege.org/l/WNET
http://openstaxcollege.org/l/WNET
COMMERCE AND CONVERSION IN NEW FRANCE
After Jacques Cartier’s voyages of discovery in the 1530s,
France showed little interest in creating
permanent colonies in North America until the early 1600s,
when Samuel de Champlain established
Quebec as a French fur-trading outpost. Although the fur trade
was lucrative, the French saw Canada
as an inhospitable frozen wasteland, and by 1640, fewer than
four hundred settlers had made their
home there. The sparse French presence meant that colonists
depended on the local native Algonquian
people; without them, the French would have perished. French
fishermen, explorers, and fur traders made
extensive contact with the Algonquian. The Algonquian, in turn,

tolerated the French because the colonists
supplied them with firearms for their ongoing war with the
Iroquois. Thus, the French found themselves
escalating native wars and supporting the Algonquian against
the Iroquois, who received weapons from
their Dutch trading partners. These seventeenth-century
conflicts centered on the lucrative trade in beaver
pelts, earning them the name of the Beaver Wars. In these wars,
fighting between rival native peoples
spread throughout the Great Lakes region.
A handful of French Jesuit priests also made their way to
Canada, intent on converting the native
inhabitants to Catholicism. The Jesuits were members of the
Society of Jesus, an elite religious order
founded in the 1540s to spread Catholicism and combat the
spread of Protestantism. The first Jesuits
arrived in Quebec in the 1620s, and for the next century, their
numbers did not exceed forty priests. Like
the Spanish Franciscan missionaries, the Jesuits in the colony
called New France labored to convert the
native peoples to Catholicism. They wrote detailed annual
reports about their progress in bringing the
faith to the Algonquian and, beginning in the 1660s, to the
Iroquois. These documents are known as the

Jesuit Relations (Figure 3.7), and they provide a rich source for
understanding both the Jesuit view of the
Indians and the Indian response to the colonizers.
One native convert to Catholicism, a Mohawk woman named
Katherine Tekakwitha, so impressed the
priests with her piety that a Jesuit named Claude Chauchetière
attempted to make her a saint in the
Church. However, the effort to canonize Tekakwitha faltered
when leaders of the Church balked at
elevating a “savage” to such a high status; she was eventually
canonized in 2012. French colonizers
pressured the native inhabitants of New France to convert, but
they virtually never saw native peoples as
their equals.
1500–1700
DEFINING "AMERICAN"

A Jesuit Priest on Indian Healing Traditions
The Jesuit Relations (Figure 3.7) provide incredible detail about
Indian life. For example, the 1636
edition, written by the Catholic priest Jean de Brébeuf,
addresses the devastating effects of disease on
native peoples and the efforts made to combat it.
Figure 3.7 French Jesuit missionaries to New France kept
detailed records of their interactions
with—and observations of—the Algonquian and Iroquois that
they converted to Catholicism. (credit:
Project Gutenberg).
Let us return to the feasts. The Aoutaerohi is a remedy which is
only for one particular kind
of disease, which they call also Aoutaerohi, from the name of a
little Demon as large as the
fist, which they say is in the body of the sick man, especially in
the part which pains him. They
find out that they are sick of this disease, by means of a dream,
or by the intervention of some
Sorcerer. . . .
Of three kinds of games especially in use among these
Peoples,—namely, the games of

crosse [lacrosse], dish, and straw,—the first two are, they say,
most healing. Is not this worthy
of compassion? There is a poor sick man, fevered of body and
almost dying, and a miserable
Sorcerer will order for him, as a cooling remedy, a game of
crosse. Or the sick man himself,
sometimes, will have dreamed that he must die unless the whole
country shall play crosse for
his health; and, no matter how little may be his credit, you will
see then in a beautiful field,
Village contending against Village, as to who will play crosse
the better, and betting against
one another Beaver robes and Porcelain collars, so as to excite
greater interest.
According to this account, how did Indians attempt to cure
disease? Why did they prescribe a game of
lacrosse? What benefits might these games have for the sick?
1500–1700 77

• Identify the first English settlements in America
• Describe the differences between the Chesapeake Bay colonies
and the New England
colonies
• Compare and contrast the wars between native inhabitants and
English colonists in
both the Chesapeake Bay and New England colonies
• Explain the role of Bacon’s Rebellion in the rise of chattel
slavery in Virginia
At the start of the seventeenth century, the English had not
established a permanent settlement in the
Americas. Over the next century, however, they outpaced their
rivals. The English encouraged emigration
far more than the Spanish, French, or Dutch. They established
nearly a dozen colonies, sending swarms of
immigrants to populate the land. England had experienced a
dramatic rise in population in the sixteenth
century, and the colonies appeared a welcoming place for those
who faced overcrowding and grinding
poverty at home. Thousands of English migrants arrived in the

Chesapeake Bay colonies of Virginia and
Maryland to work in the tobacco fields. Another stream, this
one of pious Puritan families, sought to
live as they believed scripture demanded and established the
Plymouth, Massachusetts Bay, New Haven,
Connecticut, and Rhode Island colonies of New England (Figure
3.8).
1500–1700
Figure 3.8 In the early seventeenth century, thousands of
English settlers came to what are now Virginia, Maryland,
and the New England states in search of opportunity and a
better life.
THE DIVERGING CULTURES OF THE NEW ENGLAND AND
CHESAPEAKE COLONIES
Promoters of English colonization in North America, many of
whom never ventured across the Atlantic,

wrote about the bounty the English would find there. These
boosters of colonization hoped to turn a
profit—whether by importing raw resources or providing new
markets for English goods—and spread
Protestantism. The English migrants who actually made the
journey, however, had different goals. In
Chesapeake Bay, English migrants established Virginia and
Maryland with a decidedly commercial
orientation. Though the early Virginians at Jamestown hoped to
find gold, they and the settlers in
Maryland quickly discovered that growing tobacco was the only
sure means of making money. Thousands
of unmarried, unemployed, and impatient young Englishmen,
along with a few Englishwomen, pinned
their hopes for a better life on the tobacco fields of these two
colonies.
A very different group of English men and women flocked to
the cold climate and rocky soil of New
England, spurred by religious motives. Many of the Puritans
crossing the Atlantic were people who
brought families and children. Often they were following their
ministers in a migration “beyond the
seas,” envisioning a new English Israel where reformed
Protestantism would grow and thrive, providing a

model for the rest of the Christian world and a counter to what
they saw as the Catholic menace. While the
English in Virginia and Maryland worked on expanding their
profitable tobacco fields, the English in New
England built towns focused on the church, where each
congregation decided what was best for itself. The
Congregational Church is the result of the Puritan enterprise in
America. Many historians believe the fault
lines separating what later became the North and South in the
United States originated in the profound
differences between the Chesapeake and New England colonies.
1500–1700 79
The source of those differences lay in England’s domestic
problems. Increasingly in the early 1600s,
the English state church—the Church of England, established in
the 1530s—demanded conformity, or
compliance with its practices, but Puritans pushed for greater
reforms. By the 1620s, the Church of England
began to see leading Puritan ministers and their followers as
outlaws, a national security threat because of

their opposition to its power. As the noose of conformity
tightened around them, many Puritans decided
to remove to New England. By 1640, New England had a
population of twenty-five thousand. Meanwhile,
many loyal members of the Church of England, who ridiculed
and mocked Puritans both at home and in
New England, flocked to Virginia for economic opportunity.
The troubles in England escalated in the 1640s when civil war
broke out, pitting Royalist supporters
of King Charles I and the Church of England against
Parliamentarians, the Puritan reformers and their
supporters in Parliament. In 1649, the Parliamentarians gained
the upper hand and, in an unprecedented
move, executed Charles I. In the 1650s, therefore, England
became a republic, a state without a king.
English colonists in America closely followed these events.
Indeed, many Puritans left New England and
returned home to take part in the struggle against the king and
the national church. Other English men
and women in the Chesapeake colonies and elsewhere in the
English Atlantic World looked on in horror
at the mayhem the Parliamentarians, led by the Puritan
insurgents, appeared to unleash in England. The
turmoil in England made the administration and imperial

oversight of the Chesapeake and New England
colonies difficult, and the two regions developed divergent
cultures.
THE CHESAPEAKE COLONIES: VIRGINIA AND
MARYLAND
The Chesapeake colonies of Virginia and Maryland served a
vital purpose in the developing seventeenth-
century English empire by providing tobacco, a cash crop.
However, the early history of Jamestown did
not suggest the English outpost would survive. From the outset,
its settlers struggled both with each
other and with the native inhabitants, the powerful Powhatan,
who controlled the area. Jealousies and
infighting among the English destabilized the colony. One
member, John Smith, whose famous map
begins this chapter, took control and exercised near-dictatorial
powers, which furthered aggravated the
squabbling. The settlers’ inability to grow their own food
compounded this unstable situation. They were
essentially employees of the Virginia Company of London, an
English joint-stock company, in which
investors provided the capital and assumed the risk in order to
reap the profit, and they had to make a
profit for their shareholders as well as for themselves. Most

initially devoted themselves to finding gold
and silver instead of finding ways to grow their own food.
Early Struggles and the Development of the Tobacco Economy
Poor health, lack of food, and fighting with native peoples took
the lives of many of the original Jamestown
settlers. The winter of 1609–1610, which became known as “the
starving time,” came close to annihilating
the colony. By June 1610, the few remaining settlers had
decided to abandon the area; only the last-
minute arrival of a supply ship from England prevented another
failed colonization effort. The supply ship
brought new settlers, but only twelve hundred of the seventy-
five hundred who came to Virginia between
1607 and 1624 survived.
1500–1700
MY STORY

George Percy on “The Starving Time”
George Percy, the youngest son of an English nobleman, was in
the first group of settlers at the
Jamestown Colony. He kept a journal describing their
experiences; in the excerpt below, he reports on
the privations of the colonists’ third winter.
Now all of us at James Town, beginning to feel that sharp prick
of hunger which no man truly
describe but he which has tasted the bitterness thereof, a world
of miseries ensued as the
sequel will express unto you, in so much that some to satisfy
their hunger have robbed the
store for the which I caused them to be executed. Then having
fed upon horses and other
beasts as long as they lasted, we were glad to make shift with
vermin as dogs, cats, rats, and
mice. All was fish that came to net to satisfy cruel hunger as to
eat boots, shoes, or any other
leather some could come by, and, those being spent and
devoured, some were enforced to
search the woods and to feed upon serpents and snakes and to
dig the earth for wild and
unknown roots, where many of our men were cut off of and

slain by the savages. And now
famine beginning to look ghastly and pale in every face that
nothing was spared to maintain
life and to do those things which seem incredible as to dig up
dead corpses out of graves and
to eat them, and some have licked up the blood which has fallen
from their weak fellows.
—George Percy, “A True Relation of the Proceedings and
Occurances of Moment which have
happened in Virginia from the Time Sir Thomas Gates
shipwrecked upon the Bermudes anno
1609 until my departure out of the Country which was in anno
Domini 1612,” London 1624
What is your reaction to George Percy’s story? How do you
think Jamestown managed to survive after
such an experience? What do you think the Jamestown colonists
learned?
By the 1620s, Virginia had weathered the worst and gained a
degree of permanence. Political stability came
slowly, but by 1619, the fledgling colony was operating under
the leadership of a governor, a council,
and a House of Burgesses. Economic stability came from the
lucrative cultivation of tobacco. Smoking

tobacco was a long-standing practice among native peoples, and
English and other European consumers
soon adopted it. In 1614, the Virginia colony began exporting
tobacco back to England, which earned it a
sizable profit and saved the colony from ruin. A second tobacco
colony, Maryland, was formed in 1634,
when King Charles I granted its charter to the Calvert family for
their loyal service to England. Cecilius
Calvert, the second Lord Baltimore, conceived of Maryland as a
refuge for English Catholics.
Growing tobacco proved very labor-intensive (Figure 3.9), and
the Chesapeake colonists needed a steady
workforce to do the hard work of clearing the land and caring
for the tender young plants. The mature leaf
of the plant then had to be cured (dried), which necessitated the
construction of drying barns. Once cured,
the tobacco had to be packaged in hogsheads (large wooden
barrels) and loaded aboard ship, which also
required considerable labor.
1500–1700 81

Figure 3.9 In this 1670 painting by an unknown artist, slaves
work in tobacco-drying sheds.
To meet these labor demands, early Virginians relied on
indentured servants. An indenture is a labor
contract that young, impoverished, and often illiterate
Englishmen and occasionally Englishwomen signed
in England, pledging to work for a number of years (usually
between five and seven) growing tobacco
in the Chesapeake colonies. In return, indentured servants
received paid passage to America and food,
clothing, and lodging. At the end of their indenture servants
received “freedom dues,” usually food and
other provisions, including, in some cases, land provided by the
colony. The promise of a new life in
America was a strong attraction for members of England’s
underclass, who had few if any options at home.
In the 1600s, some 100,000 indentured servants traveled to the
Chesapeake Bay. Most were poor young
men in their early twenties.
Life in the colonies proved harsh, however. Indentured servants
could not marry, and they were subject to
the will of the tobacco planters who bought their labor

contracts. If they committed a crime or disobeyed
their masters, they found their terms of service lengthened,
often by several years. Female indentured
servants faced special dangers in what was essentially a
bachelor colony. Many were exploited by
unscrupulous tobacco planters who seduced them with promises
of marriage. These planters would then
sell their pregnant servants to other tobacco planters to avoid
the costs of raising a child.
Nonetheless, those indentured servants who completed their
term of service often began new lives
as tobacco planters. To entice even more migrants to the New
World, the Virginia Company also
implemented the headright system, in which those who paid
their own passage to Virginia received fifty
acres plus an additional fifty for each servant or family member
they brought with them. The headright
system and the promise of a new life for servants acted as
powerful incentives for English migrants to
hazard the journey to the New World.
Visit Virtual Jamestown
(http://openstaxcollege.org/l/jamestown1) to access a
database of contracts of indentured servants. Search it by name

to find an ancestor or
browse by occupation, destination, or county of origin.
Click and Explore
1500–1700
http://openstaxcollege.org/l/jamestown1
The Anglo-Powhatan Wars
By choosing to settle along the rivers on the banks of the
Chesapeake, the English unknowingly placed
themselves at the center of the Powhatan Empire, a powerful
Algonquian confederacy of thirty native
groups with perhaps as many as twenty-two thousand people.
The territory of the equally impressive
Susquehannock people also bordered English settlements at the
north end of the Chesapeake Bay.
Tensions ran high between the English and the Powhatan, and

near-constant war prevailed. The First
Anglo-Powhatan War (1609–1614) resulted not only from the
English colonists’ intrusion onto Powhatan
land, but also from their refusal to follow native protocol by
giving gifts. English actions infuriated and
insulted the Powhatan. In 1613, the settlers captured Pocahontas
(also called Matoaka), the daughter of a
Powhatan headman named Wahunsonacook, and gave her in
marriage to Englishman John Rolfe. Their
union, and her choice to remain with the English, helped quell
the war in 1614. Pocahontas converted to
Christianity, changing her name to Rebecca, and sailed with her
husband and several other Powhatan to
England where she was introduced to King James I (Figure
3.10). Promoters of colonization publicized
Pocahontas as an example of the good work of converting the
Powhatan to Christianity.
Figure 3.10 This 1616 engraving by Simon van de Passe,
completed when Pocahontas and John Rolfe were
presented at court in England, is the only known contemporary
image of Pocahontas. Note her European garb and
pose. What message did the painter likely intend to convey with
this portrait of Pocahontas, the daughter of a
powerful Indian chief?

Explore the interactive exhibit Changing Images of Pocahontas
(http://openstaxcollege.org/l/pocahontas) on PBS’s website to
see the many ways
artists have portrayed Pocahontas over the centuries.
Click and Explore
1500–1700 83
http://openstaxcollege.org/l/pocahontas
http://openstaxcollege.org/l/pocahontas
Peace in Virginia did not last long. The Second Anglo-Powhatan
War (1620s) broke out because of
the expansion of the English settlement nearly one hundred
miles into the interior, and because of the
continued insults and friction caused by English activities. The
Powhatan attacked in 1622 and succeeded
in killing almost 350 English, about a third of the settlers. The
English responded by annihilating every
Powhatan village around Jamestown and from then on became
even more intolerant. The Third Anglo-

Powhatan War (1644–1646) began with a surprise attack in
which the Powhatan killed around five
hundred English colonists. However, their ultimate defeat in
this conflict forced the Powhatan to
acknowledge King Charles I as their sovereign. The Anglo-
Powhatan Wars, spanning nearly forty years,
illustrate the degree of native resistance that resulted from
English intrusion into the Powhatan
confederacy.
The Rise of Slavery in the Chesapeake Bay Colonies
The transition from indentured servitude to slavery as the main
labor source for some English colonies
happened first in the West Indies. On the small island of
Barbados, colonized in the 1620s, English planters
first grew tobacco as their main export crop, but in the 1640s,
they converted to sugarcane and began
increasingly to rely on African slaves. In 1655, England
wrestled control of Jamaica from the Spanish
and quickly turned it into a lucrative sugar island, run on slave
labor, for its expanding empire. While
slavery was slower to take hold in the Chesapeake colonies, by
the end of the seventeenth century, both
Virginia and Maryland had also adopted chattel slavery—which
legally defined Africans as property and

not people—as the dominant form of labor to grow tobacco.
Chesapeake colonists also enslaved native
people.
When the first Africans arrived in Virginia in 1619, slavery—
which did not exist in England—had not
yet become an institution in colonial America. Many Africans
worked as servants and, like their white
counterparts, could acquire land of their own. Some Africans
who converted to Christianity became free
landowners with white servants. The change in the status of
Africans in the Chesapeake to that of slaves
occurred in the last decades of the seventeenth century.
Bacon’s Rebellion, an uprising of both whites and blacks who
believed that the Virginia government was
impeding their access to land and wealth and seemed to do little
to clear the land of Indians, hastened
the transition to African slavery in the Chesapeake colonies.
The rebellion takes its name from Nathaniel
Bacon, a wealthy young Englishman who arrived in Virginia in
1674. Despite an early friendship with
Virginia’s royal governor, William Berkeley, Bacon found
himself excluded from the governor’s circle
of influential friends and councilors. He wanted land on the

Virginia frontier, but the governor, fearing
war with neighboring Indian tribes, forbade further expansion.
Bacon marshaled others, especially former
indentured servants who believed the governor was limiting
their economic opportunities and denying
them the right to own tobacco farms. Bacon’s followers
believed Berkeley’s frontier policy didn’t protect
English settlers enough. Worse still in their eyes, Governor
Berkeley tried to keep peace in Virginia by
signing treaties with various local native peoples. Bacon and his
followers, who saw all Indians as an
obstacle to their access to land, pursued a policy of
extermination.
Tensions between the English and the native peoples in the
Chesapeake colonies led to open conflict.
In 1675, war broke out when Susquehannock warriors attacked
settlements on Virginia’s frontier, killing
English planters and destroying English plantations, including
one owned by Bacon. In 1676, Bacon and
other Virginians attacked the Susquehannock without the
governor’s approval. When Berkeley ordered
Bacon’s arrest, Bacon led his followers to Jamestown, forced
the governor to flee to the safety of Virginia’s
eastern shore, and then burned the city. The civil war known as

Bacon’s Rebellion, a vicious struggle
between supporters of the governor and those who supported
Bacon, ensued. Reports of the rebellion
traveled back to England, leading Charles II to dispatch both
royal troops and English commissioners
to restore order in the tobacco colonies. By the end of 1676,
Virginians loyal to the governor gained
the upper hand, executing several leaders of the rebellion.
Bacon escaped the hangman’s noose, instead
dying of dysentery. The rebellion fizzled in 1676, but
Virginians remained divided as supporters of Bacon
continued to harbor grievances over access to Indian land.
1500–1700
Bacon’s Rebellion helped to catalyze the creation of a system of
racial slavery in the Chesapeake colonies.
At the time of the rebellion, indentured servants made up the
majority of laborers in the region. Wealthy

whites worried over the presence of this large class of laborers
and the relative freedom they enjoyed,
as well as the alliance that black and white servants had forged
in the course of the rebellion. Replacing
indentured servitude with black slavery diminished these risks,
alleviating the reliance on white
indentured servants, who were often dissatisfied and
troublesome, and creating a caste of racially defined
laborers whose movements were strictly controlled. It also
lessened the possibility of further alliances
between black and white workers. Racial slavery even served to
heal some of the divisions between
wealthy and poor whites, who could now unite as members of a
“superior” racial group.
While colonial laws in the tobacco colonies had made slavery a
legal institution before Bacon’s Rebellion,
new laws passed in the wake of the rebellion severely curtailed
black freedom and laid the foundation for
racial slavery. Virginia passed a law in 1680 prohibiting free
blacks and slaves from bearing arms, banning
blacks from congregating in large numbers, and establishing
harsh punishments for slaves who assaulted
Christians or attempted escape. Two years later, another
Virginia law stipulated that all Africans brought

to the colony would be slaves for life. Thus, the increasing
reliance on slaves in the tobacco colonies—and
the draconian laws instituted to control them—not only helped
planters meet labor demands, but also
served to assuage English fears of further uprisings and
alleviate class tensions between rich and poor
whites.
DEFINING "AMERICAN"
Robert Beverley on Servants and Slaves
Robert Beverley was a wealthy Jamestown planter and
slaveholder. This excerpt from his History and
Present State of Virginia, published in 1705, clearly illustrates
the contrast between white servants and
black slaves.
Their Servants, they distinguish by the Names of Slaves for
Life, and Servants for a time.
Slaves are the Negroes, and their Posterity, following the
condition of the Mother, according
to the Maxim, partus sequitur ventrem [status follows the
womb]. They are call’d Slaves, in
respect of the time of their Servitude, because it is for Life.
Servants, are those which serve only for a few years, according

to the time of their Indenture,
or the Custom of the Country. The Custom of the Country takes
place upon such as have no
Indentures. The Law in this case is, that if such Servants be
under Nineteen years of Age,
they must be brought into Court, to have their Age adjudged;
and from the Age they are judg’d
to be of, they must serve until they reach four and twenty: But
if they be adjudged upwards of
Nineteen, they are then only to be Servants for the term of five
Years.
The Male-Servants, and Slaves of both Sexes, are employed
together in Tilling and Manuring
the Ground, in Sowing and Planting Tobacco, Corn, &c. Some
Distinction indeed is made
between them in their Cloaths, and Food; but the Work of both,
is no other than what the
Overseers, the Freemen, and the Planters themselves do.
Sufficient Distinction is also made between the Female-
Servants, and Slaves; for a White
Woman is rarely or never put to work in the Ground, if she be
good for any thing else: And
to Discourage all Planters from using any Women so, their Law
imposes the heaviest Taxes
upon Female Servants working in the Ground, while it suffers

all other white Women to be
absolutely exempted: Whereas on the other hand, it is a common
thing to work a Woman
Slave out of Doors; nor does the Law make any Distinction in
her Taxes, whether her Work
be Abroad, or at Home.
According to Robert Beverley, what are the differences between
servants and slaves? What protections
did servants have that slaves did not?
1500–1700 85
PURITAN NEW ENGLAND
The second major area to be colonized by the English in the
first half of the seventeenth century, New
England, differed markedly in its founding principles from the
commercially oriented Chesapeake tobacco
colonies. Settled largely by waves of Puritan families in the
1630s, New England had a religious orientation
from the start. In England, reform-minded men and women had
been calling for greater changes to the

English national church since the 1580s. These reformers, who
followed the teachings of John Calvin and
other Protestant reformers, were called Puritans because of their
insistence on “purifying” the Church
of England of what they believed to be un-scriptural, especially
Catholic elements that lingered in its
institutions and practices.
Many who provided leadership in early New England were
learned ministers who had studied at
Cambridge or Oxford but who, because they had questioned the
practices of the Church of England, had
been deprived of careers by the king and his officials in an
effort to silence all dissenting voices. Other
Puritan leaders, such as the first governor of the Massachusetts
Bay Colony, John Winthrop, came from the
privileged class of English gentry. These well-to-do Puritans
and many thousands more left their English
homes not to establish a land of religious freedom, but to
practice their own religion without persecution.
Puritan New England offered them the opportunity to live as
they believed the Bible demanded. In their
“New” England, they set out to create a model of reformed
Protestantism, a new English Israel.

The conflict generated by Puritanism had divided English
society, because the Puritans demanded reforms
that undermined the traditional festive culture. For example,
they denounced popular pastimes like bear-
baiting—letting dogs attack a chained bear—which were often
conducted on Sundays when people had
a few leisure hours. In the culture where William Shakespeare
had produced his masterpieces, Puritans
called for an end to the theater, censuring playhouses as places
of decadence. Indeed, the Bible itself
became part of the struggle between Puritans and James I, who
headed the Church of England. Soon after
ascending the throne, James commissioned a new version of the
Bible in an effort to stifle Puritan reliance
on the Geneva Bible, which followed the teachings of John
Calvin and placed God’s authority above the
monarch’s. The King James Version, published in 1611, instead
emphasized the majesty of kings.
During the 1620s and 1630s, the conflict escalated to the point
where the state church prohibited Puritan
ministers from preaching. In the Church’s view, Puritans
represented a national security threat, because
their demands for cultural, social, and religious reforms
undermined the king’s authority. Unwilling

to conform to the Church of England, many Puritans found
refuge in the New World. Yet those who
emigrated to the Americas were not united. Some called for a
complete break with the Church of England,
while others remained committed to reforming the national
church.
Plymouth: The First Puritan Colony
The first group of Puritans to make their way across the Atlantic
was a small contingent known as the
Pilgrims. Unlike other Puritans, they insisted on a complete
separation from the Church of England and
had first migrated to the Dutch Republic seeking religious
freedom. Although they found they could
worship without hindrance there, they grew concerned that they
were losing their Englishness as they saw
their children begin to learn the Dutch language and adopt
Dutch ways. In addition, the English Pilgrims
(and others in Europe) feared another attack on the Dutch
Republic by Catholic Spain. Therefore, in 1620,
they moved on to found the Plymouth Colony in present-day
Massachusetts. The governor of Plymouth,
William Bradford, was a Separatist, a proponent of complete
separation from the English state church.
Bradford and the other Pilgrim Separatists represented a major

challenge to the prevailing vision of a
unified English national church and empire. On board the
Mayflower, which was bound for Virginia but
landed on the tip of Cape Cod, Bradford and forty other adult
men signed the Mayflower Compact (Figure
3.11), which presented a religious (rather than an economic)
rationale for colonization. The compact
expressed a community ideal of working together. When a
larger exodus of Puritans established the
Massachusetts Bay Colony in the 1630s, the Pilgrims at
Plymouth welcomed them and the two colonies
cooperated with each other.
1500–1700
AMERICANA
The Mayflower Compact and Its Religious Rationale
The Mayflower Compact, which forty-one Pilgrim men signed

on board the Mayflower in Plymouth
Harbor, has been called the first American governing document,
predating the U.S. Constitution by over
150 years. But was the Mayflower Compact a constitution? How
much authority did it convey, and to
whom?
Figure 3.11 The original Mayflower Compact is no longer
extant; only copies, such as this ca.1645
transcription by William Bradford, remain.
In the name of God, Amen. We, whose names are underwritten,
the loyal subjects of our
dread Sovereign Lord King James, by the Grace of God, of
Great Britain, France, and Ireland,
King, defender of the Faith, etc.
Having undertaken, for the Glory of God, and advancements of
the Christian faith and honor
of our King and Country, a voyage to plant the first colony in
the Northern parts of Virginia,
do by these presents, solemnly and mutually, in the presence of
God, and one another,
covenant and combine ourselves together into a civil body
politic; for our better ordering, and
preservation and furtherance of the ends aforesaid; and by

virtue hereof to enact, constitute,
and frame, such just and equal laws, ordinances, acts,
constitutions, and offices, from time to
time, as shall be thought most meet and convenient for the
general good of the colony; unto
which we promise all due submission and obedience.
In witness whereof we have hereunto subscribed our names at
Cape Cod the 11th of
November, in the year of the reign of our Sovereign Lord King
James, of England, France,
and Ireland, the eighteenth, and of Scotland the fifty-fourth,
1620
Different labor systems also distinguished early Puritan New
England from the Chesapeake colonies.
Puritans expected young people to work diligently at their
calling, and all members of their large families,
including children, did the bulk of the work necessary to run
homes, farms, and businesses. Very few
migrants came to New England as laborers; in fact, New
England towns protected their disciplined
1500–1700 87

homegrown workforce by refusing to allow outsiders in,
assuring their sons and daughters of steady
employment. New England’s labor system produced remarkable
results, notably a powerful maritime-
based economy with scores of oceangoing ships and the crews
necessary to sail them. New England
mariners sailing New England–made ships transported Virginian
tobacco and West Indian sugar
throughout the Atlantic World.
“A City upon a Hill”
A much larger group of English Puritans left England in the
1630s, establishing the Massachusetts Bay
Colony, the New Haven Colony, the Connecticut Colony, and
Rhode Island. Unlike the exodus of young
males to the Chesapeake colonies, these migrants were families
with young children and their university-
trained ministers. Their aim, according to John Winthrop
(Figure 3.12), the first governor of Massachusetts
Bay, was to create a model of reformed Protestantism—a “city
upon a hill,” a new English Israel. The
idea of a “city upon a hill” made clear the religious orientation
of the New England settlement, and the

charter of the Massachusetts Bay Colony stated as a goal that
the colony’s people “may be soe religiously,
peaceablie, and civilly governed, as their good Life and orderlie
Conversacon, maie wynn and incite the
Natives of Country, to the Knowledg and Obedience of the onlie
true God and Saulor of Mankinde, and
the Christian Fayth.” To illustrate this, the seal of the
Massachusetts Bay Company (Figure 3.12) shows a
half-naked Indian who entreats more of the English to “come
over and help us.”
Figure 3.12 In the 1629 seal of the Massachusetts Bay Colony
(a), an Indian is shown asking colonists to “Come
over and help us.” This seal indicates the religious ambitions of
John Winthrop (b), the colony’s first governor, for his
“city upon a hill.”
Puritan New England differed in many ways from both England
and the rest of Europe. Protestants
emphasized literacy so that everyone could read the Bible. This
attitude was in stark contrast to that
of Catholics, who refused to tolerate private ownership of
Bibles in the vernacular. The Puritans, for
their part, placed a special emphasis on reading scripture, and
their commitment to literacy led to the

establishment of the first printing press in English America in
1636. Four years later, in 1640, they
published the first book in North America, the Bay Psalm Book.
As Calvinists, Puritans adhered to the
doctrine of predestination, whereby a few “elect” would be
saved and all others damned. No one could be
sure whether they were predestined for salvation, but through
introspection, guided by scripture, Puritans
hoped to find a glimmer of redemptive grace. Church
membership was restricted to those Puritans who
were willing to provide a conversion narrative telling how they
came to understand their spiritual estate
by hearing sermons and studying the Bible.
1500–1700
Although many people assume Puritans escaped England to
establish religious freedom, they proved
to be just as intolerant as the English state church. When

dissenters, including Puritan minister Roger
Williams and Anne Hutchinson, challenged Governor Winthrop
in Massachusetts Bay in the 1630s, they
were banished. Roger Williams questioned the Puritans’ taking
of Indian land. Williams also argued for
a complete separation from the Church of England, a position
other Puritans in Massachusetts rejected,
as well as the idea that the state could not punish individuals for
their beliefs. Although he did accept
that nonbelievers were destined for eternal damnation, Williams
did not think the state could compel
true orthodoxy. Puritan authorities found him guilty of
spreading dangerous ideas, but he went on to
found Rhode Island as a colony that sheltered dissenting
Puritans from their brethren in Massachusetts. In
Rhode Island, Williams wrote favorably about native peoples,
contrasting their virtues with Puritan New
England’s intolerance.
Anne Hutchinson also ran afoul of Puritan authorities for her
criticism of the evolving religious practices
in the Massachusetts Bay Colony. In particular, she held that
Puritan ministers in New England taught
a shallow version of Protestantism emphasizing hierarchy and
actions—a “covenant of works” rather

than a “covenant of grace.” Literate Puritan women like
Hutchinson presented a challenge to the male
ministers’ authority. Indeed, her major offense was her claim of
direct religious revelation, a type of
spiritual experience that negated the role of ministers. Because
of Hutchinson’s beliefs and her defiance
of authority in the colony, especially that of Governor
Winthrop, Puritan authorities tried and convicted
her of holding false beliefs. In 1638, she was excommunicated
and banished from the colony. She went to
Rhode Island and later, in 1642, sought safety among the Dutch
in New Netherland. The following year,
Algonquian warriors killed Hutchinson and her family. In
Massachusetts, Governor Winthrop noted her
death as the righteous judgment of God against a heretic.
Like many other Europeans, the Puritans believed in the
supernatural. Every event appeared to be a
sign of God’s mercy or judgment, and people believed that
witches allied themselves with the Devil to
carry out evil deeds and deliberate harm such as the sickness or
death of children, the loss of cattle, and
other catastrophes. Hundreds were accused of witchcraft in
Puritan New England, including townspeople
whose habits or appearance bothered their neighbors or who

appeared threatening for any reason.
Women, seen as more susceptible to the Devil because of their
supposedly weaker constitutions, made up
the vast majority of suspects and those who were executed. The
most notorious cases occurred in Salem
Village in 1692. Many of the accusers who prosecuted the
suspected witches had been traumatized by the
Indian wars on the frontier and by unprecedented political and
cultural changes in New England. Relying
on their belief in witchcraft to help make sense of their
changing world, Puritan authorities executed
nineteen people and caused the deaths of several others.
Explore the Salem Witchcraft Trials
(http://openstaxcollege.org/l/salemwitch) to
learn more about the prosecution of witchcraft in seventeenth-
century New England.
Puritan Relationships with Native Peoples
Like their Spanish and French Catholic rivals, English Puritans
in America took steps to convert native
peoples to their version of Christianity. John Eliot, the leading
Puritan missionary in New England, urged
natives in Massachusetts to live in “praying towns” established
by English authorities for converted

Click and Explore
1500–1700 89
http://openstaxcollege.org/l/salemwitch
Indians, and to adopt the Puritan emphasis on the centrality of
the Bible. In keeping with the Protestant
emphasis on reading scripture, he translated the Bible into the
local Algonquian language and published
his work in 1663. Eliot hoped that as a result of his efforts,
some of New England’s native inhabitants
would become preachers.
Tensions had existed from the beginning between the Puritans
and the native people who controlled
southern New England (Figure 3.13). Relationships deteriorated
as the Puritans continued to expand their
settlements aggressively and as European ways increasingly
disrupted native life. These strains led to King
Philip’s War (1675–1676), a massive regional conflict that was
nearly successful in pushing the English out

of New England.
Figure 3.13 This map indicates the domains of New England’s
native inhabitants in 1670, a few years before King
Philip’s War.
When the Puritans began to arrive in the 1620s and 1630s, local
Algonquian peoples had viewed them as
potential allies in the conflicts already simmering between rival
native groups. In 1621, the Wampanoag,
led by Massasoit, concluded a peace treaty with the Pilgrims at
Plymouth. In the 1630s, the Puritans in
Massachusetts and Plymouth allied themselves with the
Narragansett and Mohegan people against the
Pequot, who had recently expanded their claims into southern
New England. In May 1637, the Puritans
attacked a large group of several hundred Pequot along the
Mystic River in Connecticut. To the horror of
their native allies, the Puritans massacred all but a handful of
the men, women, and children they found.
By the mid-seventeenth century, the Puritans had pushed their
way further into the interior of New
England, establishing outposts along the Connecticut River
Valley. There seemed no end to their

expansion. Wampanoag leader Metacom or Metacomet, also
known as King Philip among the English,
was determined to stop the encroachment. The Wampanoag,
along with the Nipmuck, Pocumtuck, and
Narragansett, took up the hatchet to drive the English from the
land. In the ensuing conflict, called King
Philip’s War, native forces succeeded in destroying half of the
frontier Puritan towns; however, in the end,
the English (aided by Mohegans and Christian Indians)
prevailed and sold many captives into slavery
in the West Indies. (The severed head of King Philip was
publicly displayed in Plymouth.) The war also
forever changed the English perception of native peoples; from
then on, Puritan writers took great pains to
vilify the natives as bloodthirsty savages. A new type of racial
hatred became a defining feature of Indian-
English relationships in the Northeast.
1500–1700

MY STORY
Mary Rowlandson’s Captivity Narrative
Mary Rowlandson was a Puritan woman whom Indian tribes
captured and imprisoned for several weeks
during King Philip’s War. After her release, she wrote The
Narrative of the Captivity and the Restoration
of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson, which was published in 1682 (Figure
3.14). The book was an immediate
sensation that was reissued in multiple editions for over a
century.
Figure 3.14 Puritan woman Mary Rowlandson wrote her
captivity narrative, the front cover of which is
shown here (a), after her imprisonment during King Philip’s
War. In her narrative, she tells of her
treatment by the Indians holding her as well as of her meetings
with the Wampanoag leader Metacom
(b), shown in a contemporary portrait.
But now, the next morning, I must turn my back upon the town,
and travel with them into the
vast and desolate wilderness, I knew not whither. It is not my
tongue, or pen, can express

the sorrows of my heart, and bitterness of my spirit that I had at
this departure: but God was
with me in a wonderful manner, carrying me along, and bearing
up my spirit, that it did not
quite fail. One of the Indians carried my poor wounded babe
upon a horse; it went moaning
all along, “I shall die, I shall die.” I went on foot after it, with
sorrow that cannot be expressed.
At length I took it off the horse, and carried it in my arms till
my strength failed, and I fell down
with it. Then they set me upon a horse with my wounded child
in my lap, and there being
no furniture upon the horse’s back, as we were going down a
steep hill we both fell over the
horse’s head, at which they, like inhumane creatures, laughed,
and rejoiced to see it, though
I thought we should there have ended our days, as overcome
with so many difficulties. But
the Lord renewed my strength still, and carried me along, that I
might see more of His power;
yea, so much that I could never have thought of, had I not
experienced it.
What sustains Rowlandson her during her ordeal? How does she
characterize her captors? What do you

think made her narrative so compelling to readers?
1500–1700 91
Access the entire text of Mary Rowlandson’s captivity narrative
(http://openstaxcollege.org/l/captivenarr) at the Gutenberg
Project.
• Explain the reasons for the rise of slavery in the American
colonies
• Describe changes to Indian life, including warfare and hunting
• Contrast European and Indian views on property
• Assess the impact of European settlement on the environment
As Europeans moved beyond exploration and into colonization
of the Americas, they brought changes to
virtually every aspect of the land and its people, from trade and
hunting to warfare and personal property.
European goods, ideas, and diseases shaped the changing

continent.
As Europeans established their colonies, their societies also
became segmented and divided along religious
and racial lines. Most people in these societies were not free;
they labored as servants or slaves, doing the
work required to produce wealth for others. By 1700, the
American continent had become a place of stark
contrasts between slavery and freedom, between the haves and
the have-nots.
THE INSTITUTION OF SLAVERY
Everywhere in the American colonies, a crushing demand for
labor existed to grow New World cash
crops, especially sugar and tobacco. This need led Europeans to
rely increasingly on Africans, and after
1600, the movement of Africans across the Atlantic accelerated.
The English crown chartered the Royal
African Company in 1672, giving the company a monopoly over
the transport of African slaves to the
English colonies. Over the next four decades, the company
transported around 350,000 Africans from their
homelands. By 1700, the tiny English sugar island of Barbados
had a population of fifty thousand slaves,
and the English had encoded the institution of chattel slavery

into colonial law.
This new system of African slavery came slowly to the English
colonists, who did not have slavery at
home and preferred to use servant labor. Nevertheless, by the
end of the seventeenth century, the English
everywhere in America—and particularly in the Chesapeake Bay
colonies—had come to rely on African
slaves. While Africans had long practiced slavery among their
own people, it had not been based on race.
Africans enslaved other Africans as war captives, for crimes,
and to settle debts; they generally used their
slaves for domestic and small-scale agricultural work, not for
growing cash crops on large plantations.
Additionally, African slavery was often a temporary condition
rather than a lifelong sentence, and, unlike
New World slavery, it was typically not heritable (passed from
a slave mother to her children).
The growing slave trade with Europeans had a profound impact
on the people of West Africa, giving
prominence to local chieftains and merchants who traded slaves
for European textiles, alcohol, guns,
tobacco, and food. Africans also charged Europeans for the
right to trade in slaves and imposed taxes on

Click and Explore
1500–1700
http://openstaxcollege.org/l/captivenarr
http://openstaxcollege.org/l/captivenarr
slave purchases. Different African groups and kingdoms even
staged large-scale raids on each other to
meet the demand for slaves.
Once sold to traders, all slaves sent to America endured the
hellish Middle Passage, the transatlantic
crossing, which took one to two months. By 1625, more than
325,800 Africans had been shipped to the
New World, though many thousands perished during the voyage.
An astonishing number, some four
million, were transported to the Caribbean between 1501 and
1830. When they reached their destination

in America, Africans found themselves trapped in shockingly
brutal slave societies. In the Chesapeake
colonies, they faced a lifetime of harvesting and processing
tobacco.
Everywhere, Africans resisted slavery, and running away was
common. In Jamaica and elsewhere,
runaway slaves created maroon communities, groups that
resisted recapture and eked a living from the
land, rebuilding their communities as best they could. When
possible, they adhered to traditional ways,
following spiritual leaders such as Vodun priests.
CHANGES TO INDIAN LIFE
While the Americas remained firmly under the control of native
peoples in the first decades of European
settlement, conflict increased as colonization spread and
Europeans placed greater demands upon the
native populations, including expecting them to convert to
Christianity (either Catholicism or
Protestantism). Throughout the seventeenth century, the still-
powerful native peoples and confederacies
that retained control of the land waged war against the invading
Europeans, achieving a degree of success
in their effort to drive the newcomers from the continent.

At the same time, European goods had begun to change Indian
life radically. In the 1500s, some of the
earliest objects Europeans introduced to Indians were glass
beads, copper kettles, and metal utensils.
Native people often adapted these items for their own use. For
example, some cut up copper kettles and
refashioned the metal for other uses, including jewelry that
conferred status on the wearer, who was seen
as connected to the new European source of raw materials.
As European settlements grew throughout the 1600s, European
goods flooded native communities. Soon
native people were using these items for the same purposes as
the Europeans. For example, many native
inhabitants abandoned their animal-skin clothing in favor of
European textiles. Similarly, clay cookware
gave way to metal cooking implements, and Indians found that
European flint and steel made starting
fires much easier (Figure 3.15).
Figure 3.15 In this 1681 portrait, the Niantic-Narragansett chief
Ninigret wears a combination of European and
Indian goods. Which elements of each culture are evident in this
portrait?

The abundance of European goods gave rise to new artistic
objects. For example, iron awls made the
creation of shell beads among the native people of the Eastern
Woodlands much easier, and the result
1500–1700 93
was an astonishing increase in the production of wampum, shell
beads used in ceremonies and as jewelry
and currency. Native peoples had always placed goods in the
graves of their departed, and this practice
escalated with the arrival of European goods. Archaeologists
have found enormous caches of European
trade goods in the graves of Indians on the East Coast.
Native weapons changed dramatically as well, creating an arms
race among the peoples living in
European colonization zones. Indians refashioned European
brassware into arrow points and turned axes
used for chopping wood into weapons. The most prized piece of
European weaponry to obtain was a

musket, or light, long-barreled European gun. In order to trade
with Europeans for these, native peoples
intensified their harvesting of beaver, commercializing their
traditional practice.
The influx of European materials made warfare more lethal and
changed traditional patterns of authority
among tribes. Formerly weaker groups, if they had access to
European metal and weapons, suddenly
gained the upper hand against once-dominant groups. The
Algonquian, for instance, traded with the
French for muskets and gained power against their enemies, the
Iroquois. Eventually, native peoples also
used their new weapons against the European colonizers who
had provided them.
Explore the complexity of Indian-European relationships
(http://openstaxcollege.org/l/NHC) in the series of primary
source documents on the
National Humanities Center site.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES
The European presence in America spurred countless changes in
the environment, setting into motion
chains of events that affected native animals as well as people.

The popularity of beaver-trimmed hats
in Europe, coupled with Indians’ desire for European weapons,
led to the overhunting of beaver in the
Northeast. Soon, beavers were extinct in New England, New
York, and other areas. With their loss came
the loss of beaver ponds, which had served as habitats for fish
as well as water sources for deer, moose, and
other animals. Furthermore, Europeans introduced pigs, which
they allowed to forage in forests and other
wildlands. Pigs consumed the foods on which deer and other
indigenous species depended, resulting in
scarcity of the game native peoples had traditionally hunted.
European ideas about owning land as private property clashed
with natives’ understanding of land use.
Native peoples did not believe in private ownership of land;
instead, they viewed land as a resource to be
held in common for the benefit of the group. The European idea
of usufruct—the right to common land use
and enjoyment—comes close to the native understanding, but
colonists did not practice usufruct widely in
America. Colonizers established fields, fences, and other means
of demarcating private property. Native
peoples who moved seasonally to take advantage of natural
resources now found areas off limits, claimed

by colonizers because of their insistence on private-property
rights.
The Introduction of Disease
Perhaps European colonization’s single greatest impact on the
North American environment was the
introduction of disease. Microbes to which native inhabitants
had no immunity led to death everywhere
Europeans settled. Along the New England coast between 1616
and 1618, epidemics claimed the lives of
75 percent of the native people. In the 1630s, half the Huron
and Iroquois around the Great Lakes died
Click and Explore
1500–1700
http://openstaxcollege.org/l/NHC
http://openstaxcollege.org/l/NHC

of smallpox. As is often the case with disease, the very young
and the very old were the most vulnerable
and had the highest mortality rates. The loss of the older
generation meant the loss of knowledge and
tradition, while the death of children only compounded the
trauma, creating devastating implications for
future generations.
Some native peoples perceived disease as a weapon used by
hostile spiritual forces, and they went to war
to exorcise the disease from their midst. These “mourning wars”
in eastern North America were designed
to gain captives who would either be adopted (“requickened” as
a replacement for a deceased loved one)
or ritually tortured and executed to assuage the anger and grief
caused by loss.
The Cultivation of Plants
European expansion in the Americas led to an unprecedented
movement of plants across the Atlantic. A
prime example is tobacco, which became a valuable export as
the habit of smoking, previously unknown in
Europe, took hold (Figure 3.16). Another example is sugar.
Columbus brought sugarcane to the Caribbean
on his second voyage in 1494, and thereafter a wide variety of

other herbs, flowers, seeds, and roots made
the transatlantic voyage.
Figure 3.16 Adriaen van Ostade, a Dutch artist, painted An
Apothecary Smoking in an Interior in 1646. The large
European market for American tobacco strongly influenced the
development of some of the American colonies.
Just as pharmaceutical companies today scour the natural world
for new drugs, Europeans traveled to
America to discover new medicines. The task of cataloging the
new plants found there helped give birth
to the science of botany. Early botanists included the English
naturalist Sir Hans Sloane, who traveled to
Jamaica in 1687 and there recorded hundreds of new plants
(Figure 3.17). Sloane also helped popularize
the drinking of chocolate, made from the cacao bean, in
England.
1500–1700 95
Figure 3.17 English naturalist Sir Hans Sloane traveled to

Jamaica and other Caribbean islands to catalog the flora
of the new world.
Indians, who possessed a vast understanding of local New
World plants and their properties, would have
been a rich source of information for those European botanists
seeking to find and catalog potentially
useful plants. Enslaved Africans, who had a tradition of the use
of medicinal plants in their native land,
adapted to their new surroundings by learning the use of New
World plants through experimentation
or from the native inhabitants. Native peoples and Africans
employed their knowledge effectively within
their own communities. One notable example was the use of the
peacock flower to induce abortions:
Indian and enslaved African women living in oppressive
colonial regimes are said to have used this herb
to prevent the birth of children into slavery. Europeans
distrusted medical knowledge that came from
African or native sources, however, and thus lost the benefit of
this source of information.
1500–1700

headright system
indenture
Jesuits
Middle Passage
maroon communities
musket
patroonships
repartimiento
Timucua
wampum

Key Terms
a system in which parcels of land were granted to settlers who
could pay their own
way to Virginia
a labor contract that promised young men, and sometimes
women, money and land after they
worked for a set period of years
members of the Society of Jesus, an elite Catholic religious
order founded in the 1540s to spread
Catholicism and to combat the spread of Protestantism
the perilous, often deadly transatlantic crossing of slave ships
from the African coast to
the New World
groups of runaway slaves who resisted recapture and eked a
living from the land
a light, long-barreled European gun
large tracts of land and governing rights granted to merchants
by the Dutch West India

Company in order to encourage colonization
a Spanish colonial system requiring Indian towns to supply
workers for the colonizers
the native people of Florida, whom the Spanish displaced with
the founding of St. Augustine,
the first Spanish settlement in North America
shell beads used in ceremonies and as jewelry and currency
Summary
In their outposts at St. Augustine and Santa Fe, the Spanish
never found the fabled mountains of gold they
sought. They did find many native people to convert to
Catholicism, but their zeal nearly cost them the
colony of Santa Fe, which they lost for twelve years after the
Pueblo Revolt. In truth, the grand dreams of
wealth, conversion, and a social order based on Spanish control
never came to pass as Spain envisioned
them.
The French and Dutch established colonies in the northeastern

part of North America: the Dutch in
present-day New York, and the French in present-day Canada.
Both colonies were primarily trading posts
for furs. While they failed to attract many colonists from their
respective home countries, these outposts
nonetheless intensified imperial rivalries in North America.
Both the Dutch and the French relied on native
peoples to harvest the pelts that proved profitable in Europe.
The English came late to colonization of the Americas,
establishing stable settlements in the 1600s after
several unsuccessful attempts in the 1500s. After Roanoke
Colony failed in 1587, the English found more
success with the founding of Jamestown in 1607 and Plymouth
in 1620. The two colonies were very
different in origin. The Virginia Company of London founded
Jamestown with the express purpose
of making money for its investors, while Puritans founded
Plymouth to practice their own brand of
Protestantism without interference.
1500–1700 97

Both colonies battled difficult circumstances, including poor
relationships with neighboring Indian tribes.
Conflicts flared repeatedly in the Chesapeake Bay tobacco
colonies and in New England, where a massive
uprising against the English in 1675 to 1676—King Philip’s
War—nearly succeeded in driving the intruders
back to the sea.
The development of the Atlantic slave trade forever changed the
course of European settlement in the
Americas. Other transatlantic travelers, including diseases,
goods, plants, animals, and even ideas like the
concept of private land ownership, further influenced life in
America during the sixteenth and seventeenth
centuries. The exchange of pelts for European goods including
copper kettles, knives, and guns played a
significant role in changing the material cultures of native
peoples. During the seventeenth century, native
peoples grew increasingly dependent on European trade items.
At the same time, many native inhabitants
died of European diseases, while survivors adopted new ways of
living with their new neighbors.

Review Questions
1. Which of the following was a goal of the
Spanish in their destruction of Fort Caroline?
A. establishing a foothold from which to battle
the Timucua
B. claiming a safe place to house the New
World treasures that would be shipped back
to Spain
C. reducing the threat of French privateers
D. locating a site for the establishment of Santa
Fe
2. Why did the Spanish build Castillo de San
Marcos?
A. to protect the local Timucua
B. to defend against imperial challengers
C. as a seat for visiting Spanish royalty
D. to house visiting delegates from rival

imperial powers
3. How did the Pueblo attempt to maintain their
autonomy in the face of Spanish settlement?
4. What was patroonship?
A. a Dutch ship used for transporting beaver
furs
B. a Dutch system of patronage that
encouraged the arts
C. a Dutch system of granting tracts of land in
New Netherland to encourage colonization
D. a Dutch style of hat trimmed with beaver fur
from New Netherland
5. Which religious order joined the French
settlement in Canada and tried to convert the
natives to Christianity?
A. Franciscans
B. Calvinists

C. Anglicans
D. Jesuits
6. How did the French and Dutch colonists differ
in their religious expectations? How did both
compare to Spanish colonists?
7. What was the most lucrative product of the
Chesapeake colonies?
A. corn
B. tobacco
C. gold and silver
D. slaves
8. What was the primary cause of Bacon’s
Rebellion?
A. former indentured servants wanted more
opportunities to expand their territory
B. African slaves wanted better treatment
C. Susquahannock Indians wanted the
Jamestown settlers to pay a fair price for

their land
D. Jamestown politicians were jockeying for
power
9. The founders of the Plymouth colony were:
A. Puritans
B. Catholics
1500–1700
C. Anglicans
D. Jesuits
10. Which of the following is not true of the
Puritan religion?
A. It required close reading of scripture.
B. Church membership required a conversion

narrative.
C. Literacy was crucial.
D. Only men could participate.
11. How did the Chesapeake colonists solve their
labor problems?
12. What was the Middle Passage?
A. the fabled sea route from Europe to the Far
East
B. the land route from Europe to Africa
C. the transatlantic journey that African slaves
made to America
D. the line between the northern and southern
colonies
13. Which of the following is not an item
Europeans introduced to Indians?
A. wampum
B. glass beads

C. copper kettles
D. metal tools
14. How did European muskets change life for
native peoples in the Americas?
15. Compare and contrast European and Indian
views on property.
Critical Thinking Questions
16. Compare and contrast life in the Spanish, French, Dutch,
and English colonies, differentiating between
the Chesapeake Bay and New England colonies. Who were the
colonizers? What were their purposes in
being there? How did they interact with their environments and
the native inhabitants of the lands on
which they settled?
17. Describe the attempts of the various European colonists to
convert native peoples to their belief
systems. How did these attempts compare to one another? What
were the results of each effort?
18. How did chattel slavery differ from indentured servitude?
How did the former system come to replace

the latter? What were the results of this shift?
19. What impact did Europeans have on their New World
environments—native peoples and their
communities as well as land, plants, and animals? Conversely,
what impact did the New World’s native
inhabitants, land, plants, and animals have on Europeans? How
did the interaction of European and
Indian societies, together, shape a world that was truly “new”?
1500–1700 99
"Thirteen Original Colonies" Please respond to the
following: PROVIDE SPECIFIC EVIDENCE FROM THE
WEBTEXTBOOK in your response.
· Using the Webtext, (Be sure to provide specific evidence from
the textbook readings for this week for your
response MINIMUM OF 150 WORDS) briefly describe three (3)
characteristics for each of the English colonies located in the
South, Middle, and New England regions Now state two (2)
religious, business, agricultural, or political elements most
likely to be found in South, Middle, and New England colonies
that set them apart from each other.

· Imagine you are a colonist, which region seems most
appealing to create a new life in the New World.
TEC H | 10/04/2013 @ 6:15PM | 15,497 views
“Cell phones” at work are not new. Nor are smart phones. Many
credit
Blackberry for inventing the concept, but few would argue that
Apple with its
iPhone, more than other device created this explosive
phenomena called
BYOD – Bring Your Own Device to work.
Most of what BYOD seems to represent so far is an unbalanced
equation in
favor of employees. Employees may be happier because they
can carry their
favorite device to get company email, but it is not clear that
employers are
happy with the results. Keep in mind, that 90%+ of BYOD
activities are

email, calendar, personal banking, news, family life
coordination, Twitter
and Facebook, but little else.
In my conversations with business and technology leaders,
many
organizations are asking themselves if the fully loaded costs of
~$5.50/month/employee, in addition to any device or services
subsidy, is
worth it to the company.
If BYOD 1.0 is about employees, what might a BYOD 2.0 look
like?
What are enterprises looking to get out of BYOD going
forward? With this in
mind, I have been asking a lot of CIO’s, Directors of IT and
other smart
people what they think.
Once such person is Yaacov Cohen, CEO of harmon.ie, a fast
growing
enterprise mobility company. Yaacov talks to senior executives
around the
world about how better collaborated ideas and increased

productivity can
take place via personal use of mobile devices at work – and he
has some
pretty interesting insights to share.
1. Yaacov, how do we move from this Bring Your Own Device
(BYOD)
paradigm into BYOD 2.0, which you talk about as more of a
“Use Your Own
Device” mentality?
“Everyone has been talking about BYOD, which should be more
than
bringing their devices to work and then putting them to the side
and saying,
“Hey, stay quiet. Don’t disturb me. I’ve got a lot of work to
do.” And they go
to their laptops and do most of their work.”
“We want to change that. Business leaders are looking for
change. The
mobile enterprise and BYOD 2.0 is not about bringing devices
to work; it is
about using devices for work. How does business turn these
shiny new toys

into business tools?”
“That means allowing employees to work with customers,
review contracts,
write blog posts – do real work on mobile devices.”
2. Is BYOD a good idea in a practical sense?
“BYOD essentially means freedom of choice. Today’s IT
professionals
recognize the need to work with users rather than impose
procedures and
systems on them. BYOD is an expression of our world, which is
becoming
more democratic and more engaging.”
“We’ve gotten stuck on the infrastructure side of things. It is
true that mobile
brings a lot of questions about security. What happens if I lose
my device?
What happens if an employee leaves the company with sensitive
records on
his mobile device? We need to address these issues and then we
need to
move beyond them.”

3. What are the key business drivers for how enterprise should
invest in
BYOD 2.0?
“The primary business driver is getting work done. Business
users do not
want to compromise. The want convenience. They want to be
able to do the
work without being tethered to their laptops. People deserve and
demand a
great user experience.”
“There are other drivers too. There are growing worries about
the high costs
of data leakage and redundant licenses caused when business
users ‘go
rogue’. Employee use of unsanctioned IT resources that are
outside the
Bob Egan, Contributor
I write about mobile
BYOD As We Know It Is Dead - Forbes
http://www.forbes.com/sites/bobegan/2013/10/04/byod-as-we-

know-it-is...
1 of 2 1/30/2014 1:38 PM
This article is available online at:
know-it-is-dead/
supervision of corporate IT is rampant. I worry a lot about the
potential for
U.S. businesses facing billions in cleanup costs caused by
unintentional data
leakage, and to use a Bob Egan phrase “the digital exhaust”.
Let’s not
forget the hundreds of millions more in redundant licenses that
are likely to
become more visible over time. It should be common sense that
employees
are going to use whatever they need to do to get work done.
This will not
change until IT and the business leaders sort out how to make

enterprise
collaboration services easily mobile accessible.”
4. How significant are Cloud services for BYOD?
“The cloud is essential to the mobile enterprise. Documents are
still the
foundation of business: spreadsheets, presentations, documents
where I put
my thoughts down or write business proposals. So we need to
enable
document collaboration at the office and on-the-go. Microsoft
with Office
365 has done a terrific job of creating an office-enabled cloud,
and vendors
like harmon.ie bring full-featured, native Office 365 and
SharePoint access to
multiple devices – iPads, iOS devices and Blackberry.”
5. It’s not always about investing in new applications. Existing
tools and
solutions relevant too. True?
“Absolutely. I think mobility is not about introducing new tools
that I’m not

comfortable using. “I’m just doing it for the sake of being
mobile, being cool,
being a technologist. A lot of people are not ready to give up on
Excel. Let’s
face it. Some might like it; some might hate it – but can you
live without it?
Sometimes we end up switching between the means and the
purpose. The
purpose is getting things complete, not learning new tools.”
6. What are the top three best practices that are trending
through your
conversations with company leaders?
#1 – Enterprise mobility is the right way to go and we need to
provide
mobility to end-users. The trend is about thinking beyond the
device and
much more about using mobile to get real work done that drives
revenue for
a company and improves customer satisfaction.
#2 – IT needs to switch from being a gatekeeper to being a
technology
opener. It is not about chief information officer. It is about

chief innovation
officer.
#3 – Do not confuse innovation and disruption. Provide an
innovation
that is easily absorbable by your mainstream business users.
“Business users do not care about IT – and that is something
that IT folks
tend to forget. The last thing they care about is a name. They do
not care if it
comes from Microsoft or Box or Java, or from IBM, or Google.
They care
that they want to get their jobs done so that they can get home
to do other
things. The Enterprise IT has yet to deliver.”
In Summary:
If BYOD 1.0 has been responding to the needs of the employee,
BYOD 2.0
efforts will focus more on the needs of where the enterprise and
the
employee intersect. Perhaps the most valuable key attribute of
BYOD 2.0 will

be to provide right- time experience (user interface + user
experience) to the
systems, solutions and points of collaboration that are mutually
relevant to
the company and to the employee.
Over the next month, I will writing more about developing and
bringing very
scalable, great experiences to employees – and to customers,
through the
mobile channel. I’m also planning more executive interviews. In
the
meantime, let me know what you think !
BYOD As We Know It Is Dead - Forbes
know-it-is...
2 of 2 1/30/2014 1:38 PM

Exploring new mobile and cloud platforms without a governance .docx

More Related Content

Similar to Exploring new mobile and cloud platforms without a governance .docx (20)

More from ssuser454af01 (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Exploring new mobile and cloud platforms without a governance .docx