EXPLORING SOUND SIGNATURE FOR VEHICLE DETECTION AND CLASSIFICATION USING ANN

International Journal on Soft Computing (IJSC) Vol.4, No.2, May 2013
DOI: 10.5121/ijsc.2013.4203 29
EXPLORING SOUND SIGNATURE FOR VEHICLE
DETECTION AND CLASSIFICATION USING ANN
Jobin George1
, Anila Cyril2
, Bino I. Koshy3
and Leena Mary4
1
Department of EC Engineering, Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology, Kottayam, India
jobing4@gmail.com
2,3
Department of Civil Engineering, Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology, Kottayam,
India
anilacyril110@gmail.com, bino@rit.ac.in
4
Department of CS and Engineering, Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology, Kottayam,
India
leena.mary@rit.ac.in
ABSTRACT
This paper attempts to explore the possibility of using sound signatures for vehicle detection and
classification purposes. Sound emitted by vehicles are captured for a two lane undivided road carrying
moderate traffic. Simultaneous arrival of different types vehicles, overtaking at the study location, sound of
horns, random but identifiable back ground noises, continuous high energy noises on the back ground are
the different challenges encountered in the data collection. Different features were explored out of which
smoothed log energy was found to be useful for automatic vehicle detection by locating peaks. Mel-
frequency ceptral coefficients extracted from fixed regions around the detected peaks along with the
manual vehicle labels are utilised to train an Artificial Neural Network (ANN). The classifier for four
broad classes heavy, medium, light and horns was trained. The ANN classifier developed was able to
predict categories well.
KEYWORDS
Traffic characterises, vehicle detection, multilayer feedforward neural network, vehicle classification.
1. INTRODUCTION
Vehicles produce sound when they move. This include engine noise, noise due to tyre - pavement
interaction, body rattling, vibrations, horns etc. The sound level also depends on the
characteristics of the road and operating conditions. Under same type of operating conditions,
similar types of vehicle may emit similar sound, thus suggesting a specific sound signature for
each type of vehicle. Vehicle detection and classification have been attempted using many ways.
Image processing techniques are used to classify the vehicles under the real time traffic
management and for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). Inductive loops based systems are
widely used for determination of vehicle counts.
Vehicle detection while it is in motion is a prerequisite for traffic and speed management,
classified vehicle count, traffic signal time optimization, gap/ headway measurement and military
purposes. Vehicle detection techniques are in a stage of continuous evolution. Traditional
methods use intrusive sensors such as inductive loops [1], magnetometers, microloop probes,
pneumatic road tubes and piezoelectric cables [2]. Unattended ground magnetometer sensor [3]

30
was found to be effective to detect the vehicle passing. Since these intrusive methods decrease the
pavement life and affect traffic during installation and maintenance, it has been replaced by non
intrusive techniques such as video image processing, microwave radar, laser radar, passive
infrared, ultrasonic, passive acoustic array and combinations of sensor technologies such as
passive infrared and microwave doppler or passive infrared and ultrasonic [2].
Researches on the application of image processing techniques for vehicle detection have proved it
to be a perfect substitute for conventional methods. Now-a-days, video monitoring is widely used
for signal control and traffic management. Traffic video processed using unsupervised vehicle
detection and spatio-temporal tracking is effective in vehicle tracking in complex urban situations
[4]. In temporal difference based image processing (also known as Consecutive image subtraction
techniques), differences in consecutive image is analysed to detect a moving vehicle and its speed
[5]. Gray scale images that are frame differences of a video were effective for detecting vehicles.
Using edge detection, resolution reduction and modified morphological transformation techniques
when incorporated into processing techniques along with Hough transforms and fuzzy integrals, it
was possible to obtain a good vehicle detection system [6].
Processing videos for classification of vehicle detection and classification is computationally
intensive and time consuming. Vehicle classification using sound signal have been attempted by
researchers previously. Munich [7] compared conventional methods used for speaker recognition,
namely, systems based on Mel-frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) and either Gaussian
Mixture Models (GMM) or Hidden Markov Models (HMM), with Bayesian subspace method
based on the Short Term Fourier Transform (STFT) of the vehicles’ acoustic signature. He found
that a probabilistic subspace classifier outperformed conventional MFCC-GMM- and MFCC-
HMM-based systems by 50%. Two sets of features were fused for better vehicle classification
[8]. One being harmonic components, mainly characterizing engine noise and second is a group
of key frequency components, designated to reflect other minor but also important acoustic
factors, such as tire friction noise. Fusing these two sets of features provides a more complete
description of vehicles’ acoustic signatures, and reduces the limitation of relying one particular
feature set [8]. Bhave and Rao [9] reported an investigation of acoustic features relating to
vehicular traffic in relation to type of vehicle and state of motion in monitoring traffic congestion.
Different vehicles, broadly classified into two, three wheelers and heavy vehicle were studied for
their acoustic signatures. A source filter model of engine sound was used to derive suitable
features. The performance of formant based features is compared with that of Mel-Frequency
Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) via a k-NN classifier on a manually labelled database of traffic
sounds.
In this work, we use smoothed logarithmic energy for automatically detecting vehicle by a peak
picking algorithm. Spectral characteristics of the sound signature represented using MFCC for
vehicles are used to train a classifier for three broad categories of vehicles. While testing, MFCC
extracted from automatically detected peaks are applied to the classifier to get the class labels.
Remaining part of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes data collection procedure
and analysis of the collected data. In Section 3, methodology used for vehicle detection and
classification are discussed. Experimental details and results are discussed in Section 4. Section 5
summarizes the study in this paper.
2. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
In this section the data collection and analysis is elaborated. Roadside recording was performed
on typical working days during several traffic conditions. The initial task pertained to sound
recordings without background noise to eliminate the need for filtering. Simultaneous video and
sound recordings were performed by Sony Handycam and Zoom H4n audio recorders. Stereo

31
recordings using two onboard microphones were used for the study. The recordings were about
15-30 minutes continuous duration at a distance of 1.5m from pavement edge. The sites were
selected to capture the sound of moving vehicles without much acceleration or gear change. Also
the recordings were attempted without capturing undue attention from motorists on clear sunny
working days of the week.
2.1. Analysis of Vehicle Data
Collected vehicle data was analysed and studied using wavesurfer. Wavesurfer is a free software
tool designed for analysis and labelling of speech data. Here wavesurfer is used for labelling and
observing the characteristics of the recorded vehicle data as illustrated in Fig 1.
The vehicle sound recordings were manually labelled for identification of broad categories of
vehicles like light vehicles, medium vehicles and heavy vehicles as shown in Fig. 1(a). The light
vehicles included two and three wheelers. The medium type vehicles included cars, SUVs and
light trucks and the heavy vehicles included buses and trucks. Discernable incidents like horn
sound were also labelled. The noise of wind or accidental movement of audio recorder was not
labelled as an incident. Labelling was also done with the specific class of vehicles as hep, mep
and lp for heavy, medium, and light vehicles respectively as shown in Fig. 1(b). Horns were
labelled as hop.
Fig. 1. Visualisation of collected vehicle sound data using wavesurfer showing (a)& (b) broad
category labels (c) sound wave form (d) energy contour in dB (e) wideband spectrogram.
Analysing the energy contour shown in Fig. 1(d), it was observed that corresponding to passing of
each vehicle, there is an increase in energy. The maximum energy is recorded at the instant
vehicle crosses the audio recorder. The wideband spectrogram as in Fig. 1(e) shows presence of
high energy, spread at different range of the audio spectrum (0-20KHz). Spectrum corresponding
to horn shows a distinct periodicity in energy distribution as shown in Fig. 1(e). The analysis of
vehicle audio recording s indicated that detection of energy peaks may give an approximate count
of vehicles passing the recorder at a particular point.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)

32
2.2. Features for Vehicle Detection
A preliminary study was conducted to identify discriminative features for vehicle detection.
Various features explored include the following: (i) short time energy (ii) log energy (iii)
smoothed log energy.
(i) Energy
One of the basic short-time analysis functions useful for vehicle sound signals is the
short-time energy. The short-time energy, En is defined as
∑∑ ==
−=−=
L
m
L
m
n mnwmxmnwmxE
1
22
1
2
][][])[][( (1)
Where L is the number of samples of the signal, w [n-m] represents a time shifted window
sequence, whose purpose is to select a segment of the sequence x[m] in the neighbourhoods of
sample m = n. As there are different forms for energy representation, we explored different ways
for calculating energy of the sound signal. Fig. 2 (a) and (b) show a sound waveform and
corresponding short time energy. It can be observed that the energy is relatively high for the
vehicle occurrence compared to the low energy regions corresponding to noises of the
background. But it consists of high frequency variations or ripples which may not be suited for
vehicle peak detection.
Fig. 2. Features explored for vehicle detection (a) sound waveform with labels (b) short time
energy (c) logarithmic energy in dB (d) smoothed logarithmic energy in dB
(ii) Logarithmic energy
In order to reduce high frequency variations and dynamic range of short term energy, the
logarithmic energy (in dB) is computed. As shown in Fig 2(c) log energy also contains high
frequency ripples/ components. Logarithmic energy in dB is found using 20*log(energy).
(iii) Smoothed logarithmic energy
Logarithmic energy in dB shown in Fig. 2(c) contains high frequency ripples/components which
may create problems while detecting the presence of vehicles using peak detection. Hence high
frequency components are removed using appropriately designed low pass filter. An elliptic low
pass filter with Rp = 3; Rs = 60; Wp = (1000/fs); Ws = (2000/fs) is used for this where fs is the
sampling rate (48000 samples/second), Rp is the pass band ripple factor, Rs is the stop band
ripple factor, Wp is the pass band frequency and Ws is the stop band frequency. Fig 2(d) shows
the smoothed logarithmic energy after removing the high frequency components from 2(c).

33
3. METHODOLOGY FOR VEHICLE DETECTION AND CLASSIFICATION
3.1. Vehicle detection
The peak finding algorithm for vehicle detection is as follows.
1.Start with inspecting every 10 ms window of energy contour in dB, find peak for each
window, and inspect the values of neighboring samples (previous 40th
sample and next 40th
sample in our studies).
2.If both neighbouring point have very low value compared to the peak then identify the
considered peak as the potential peak, otherwise discard the peak.
3.Now move to next 10 ms of energy contour and repeat the procedure.
4.Plot the identified potential vehicle peaks.
Fig. 3. Methodology for vehicle detection (a) sound waveform (b) short time energy (c)
logarithmic energy in dB (d) smoothed logarithmic energy in dB with peaks marked (e) Detected
peaks corresponding to vehicles.
3.2. Algorithm for vehicle detection and classification
1. Divide 75% of the collected data for training and remaining for testing.
2. Do manual labelling for training and testing data as illustrated in Fig 1.
3. For each manually labelled peak compute 30 dimensional MFCC for 20ms region
around the peak. Perform ceptral mean subtraction for MFCC values. Normalise MFCC
value to the range between (0,1).
4. Initialise appropriate MLFFNN structure with random weights.
5. Train MLFFNN using MFCC as input and vehicle label as output using back
propagation training.
6. Testing of trained MLFFNN is done as shown in Fig 4. The various steps are:
i) Compute the log energy of test data
ii) Smooth the log energy using appropriate low pass filter.
iii) Detect peaks corresponding to vehicles using peak detection algorithm.
iv) Extract MFCC for the region around the detected peak.

34
v) Perform cepstral mean subtraction to remove the influence of unwanted background
noise
vi) Normalize the MFCC values to limit its range between (0,1)
vii) Apply this normalized MFCC as input to trained MLFFNN and find out the output
labels.
viii) Compute the classification accuracy using the manual labels of test data
Fig 4. Block schematic illustrating various stages during the test phase
of vehicle detection and classification.
4. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Vehicle sound recordings of about 120 minutes are used for demonstrating the effectiveness of
the proposed algorithm. Recording for 90 minutes duration is used for training and another
recording of duration 30 minutes is used for testing. In the proposed method, MFCC features are
used for training and testing purpose. Extracted features and labels along with is used for training
the MLFFNN with structure 13L 35N 10N 4N where L denotes neurons with linear activation
function, N denotes neurons with nonlinear (sigmoid in this case) activation function, and the
numerals denote the number of neurons in each layer. This MLFFNN classifier is then tested
using MFCC features derived from regions around automatically detected vehicle peaks in the
test data. The classification accuracy is computed with the manual labelling of test data. Results
are as shown in table 1. An overall classification of approximately 67% was obtained using this
method. Confusion matrix corresponding to test data 1 and 2 are given in Table 2 and 3
respectively, which indicate that maximum confusion has occurred in case of light and medium
category of vehicles which is obvious.
Table 1. Performance of proposed vehicle detection
and classification algorithm
Particulars of test data Vehicle classification accuracy (%)
Test data 1 67.4%
Test data 2 66%
Table 2. Confusion Matrix for Vehicle Classes (Data set- No.1)
Model
Test
Heavy Medium Light Horn
Heavy 7 1 2 0
Medium 3 16 11 2
Light 2 5 34 0
Horn 2 3 0 7

35
Table 3. Confusion Matrix for Vehicle Classes (Data set- No.2)
Model
Test
Heavy Medium Light Horn
Heavy 5 1 2 0
Medium 1 14 4 3
Light 4 10 34 0
Horn 3 1 2 6
5. CONCLUSIONS
The present study has shown the potential of low pass filtered log energy being used for
automatic vehicle detection by locating peaks. The ANN classifier developed was able to predict
different categories of vehicles. The prediction success shows considerable confusion between the
classes of medium and light category of vehicles where similar types of engines are used. The
study has not addressed multilane traffic and its effect on the sound sampling due to simultaneous
arrivals of small vehicles, overtaking of different classes of vehicles. The effect of acceleration
and gear shift on classification need further exploration.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank All India Council of Technical Education (AICTE), India for
supporting this study under the Research Promotion Scheme (RPS).
REFERENCES
[1] Janusz Gajda, Ryszard Sroka, Marek Stencel, Andrzej Wajda & Tadeusz Zeglen, (2001) “A Vehicle
Classification Based on Inductive Loop Detectors”, IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement
Technology Conference, pp 460-464.
[2] Luz Elena Y. Mimbela & Lawrence A. Klein, (2000) A Summary of Vehicle Detection and
Surveillance Technologies used in Intelligent Transportation System, FHWA.
[3] Carol T. Christou & Garry M. Jacyna, (2010) “Vehicle Detection and Localization Using Unattended
Ground Magnetometer Sensors”, International Conference on Information Fusion pp 1-8.
[4] Chengcui Zhang, Shu-Ching Chen, Mei-Ling Shyu & Srinivas Peeta, (2003) “Adaptive Background
Learning for Vehicle Detection and Spatio-Temporal Tracking”, International Conference on
Information, Communications and Signal Processing (ICICS), 2A3.7, pp 1-5.
[5] L.G.C Wimalaratna & D.U.J. Sonnadara, (2008) “Estimation of the Speeds of Moving Vehicles from
Video Sequences”, Proceedings of the Technical Sessions, 24, Institute of Physics – Sri Lanka, pp 6-
12.
[6] Xiaobo Li, Zhi-Qiang Liu & Ka-Ming Leung, (2002) “Detection of vehicles from traffic scenes using
fuzzy integrals”, Pattern Recognition 35, pp 967–980.
[7] Mario Munich (2004) “Bayesian Subspace Methods for Acoustic Signature Recognition of Vehicles”,
Proceedings of 12th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 2004), pp 2107-2110.
[8] Baofeng Guo, Mark Nixon & Thyagaraju Damrala, (2011) “Improving acoustic vehicle classification
by information fusion”, Pattern Analysis and Applications, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 29-43.
[9] Nikhil Bhave & Preeti Rao, (2011) “Vehicle Engine Sound Analysis Applied To Traffic Congestion
Estimation” , Proceedings of International Symposium on Computer Music Modeling and Retrieval
(CMMR) and Frontiers of Research on Speech and Music (FRSM).

36
Authors
Jobin George graduated from Kannur University in Electronics and Communications
Engineering in 2010. He is currently doing masters degree in Advanced Communication
Engineering and Information Systems at Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology, Kottayam,
Kerala, India. His area of interest is signal processing and neural network
Anila Cyril graduated in Civil Engineering from College of Engineering, Trichur, Kerala
in 2011. She is currently perusing masters degree in Transportation Engineering at Rajiv
Gandhi Institute of Technology, Kottayam, Kerala, India. Her area of interest
is traffic simulation and modelling.
Bino I. Koshy received his Bachelors degree from Kerala University in 1985. He
obtained his M.Tech and Ph.D. from Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, India in
1987 and 2007 respectively. Currently he is working as Professor in Civil Engineering,
Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology, Kottayam, Kerala, India. His research interests are
travel demand modelling, traffic modelling and artificial neural networks. He is a life
member of Indian Society for Technical Education and Institute of Urban Transport
(India). He is also a Fellow of Institution of Engineers (India).
Leena Mary received her Bachelors degree from Mangalore University in 1988. She
obtained her M.Tech from Kerala University and Ph.D. from Indian Institute of
Technology, Madras, India. She has 22 years of teaching experience. Currently she is
working as Professor in Computer Science and Engineering at Rajiv Gandhi Institute of
Technology, Kottayam, Kerala, India. Her research interests are speech processing,
speaker forensics, signal processing and neural networks. She has published a book on
Extraction and Representation of Prosody for Speaker, Speech and Language Recognition
by Springer. She is a member of IEEE and a life member of Indian
Society for Technical Education.

EXPLORING SOUND SIGNATURE FOR VEHICLE DETECTION AND CLASSIFICATION USING ANN

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to EXPLORING SOUND SIGNATURE FOR VEHICLE DETECTION AND CLASSIFICATION USING ANN (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

EXPLORING SOUND SIGNATURE FOR VEHICLE DETECTION AND CLASSIFICATION USING ANN