14th International Conference on Methodologies and
Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning
University of Salamanca (Spain)
26th-28th June, 2024
Introduction
● Importance of Feedback in Education
○ Crucial for understanding and improving learning
○ Formative assessment enhances learning outcomes
● Objective of the Study
○ Assess the quality of three types of feedback:
■ Schematic Feedback (Traditional AI)
■ Discursive Feedback (LLM)
■ Combined Feedback (LLM + Schematic Feedback)
Research Questions
RQ1: How can we exploit Large Language Models (LLMs) to provide helpful feedback to
students in our educational scenario?
● Objective: Investigate how effectively LLMs, such as ChatGPT-4, can be utilized to generate
feedback that is both informative and supportive for students in data science courses.
● Approach: Compare traditional AI-generated feedback with feedback generated by LLMs
and a combination of both, focusing on clarity, accuracy, and educational value.
RQ2: What is the students' perception of the feedback provided?
● Objective: Understand the students' viewpoints on the usefulness, clarity, and overall quality
of the feedback they receive.
● Approach: Collect and analyze student feedback through surveys and course evaluations,
comparing their experiences with LLM-generated feedback against traditional feedback
methods.
Methodology - The Feedback
Methodology - Schematic Feedback
Schematic Feedback
● Technique: Toolchain compares correct solution with student's solution
● Feedback Generation: a couple of 3-ple
a. list 1: (command_1, output_1, optionalComment_1)
b. list 2: (command_2, output_2, optionalComment_2)
Feedback comparison
● Step 1: Calculated a distance as an estimate of the final grade
● Step 2: Statistical analysis of code evaluates differences between
command/output ratios by returning feedback on missing commands
● Step 3: classifier asserts the comment correctness returning feedback
Methodology - LLM-generated Feedback
● Technique: Two types of feedback generated via chatGPT-4
a. 1st - discursive feedback: (i) student model, (ii) the exercise,
(iii) given solution, (iv) chatGPT explain the mistakes
b. 2nd - combine feedback: enriches the 1st with the schematic
feedback
Methodology - LLMgen -> Discursive Feedback
● Technique: Produced from a prompts built with schematic feedback informations
● Student Model: contains general ability in concept taught in the course
estimated through the Rasch model
Methodology - LLM gen -> Combined Feedback
● Technique: 2 types of feedback
through chatGPT-4
a. feedback 1. prompt with (i) the
student's model, (ii) the exercise (iii) the
solution provided, and (iv) a sentence
asking chatGPT to explain errors if any.
b. feedback 2. enriches the prompt with
the schematic feedback we saw earlier
● 3 steps evaluation:
a. estimate of the final grade by a distance
b. statistical analysis to evaluate command/output ratio
c. a classifier asserts whether the comment is correct by returning feedback on correctness
Evaluation by Teachers
Objective: answering RQ1 comparing the 3 feedbacks
● RQ1.1: (i) Identify the best of the 3 feedbacks by the students in 60 wrong solutions. (ii)
and asked two professors to evaluate the feedback deemed clear enough
● RQ1.2: Compares student and correct solutions
Evaluation by Students
Objective: answering RQ2 analysing LLM
and SF & CF utility
● RQ2.1: (i) at the beginning of the course,
evaluation usefulness of AI-feedback. (ii)
before the exam, assessment of student
experience with AI-feedback.
● RQ2.2: a couple of questions about
Schematic & Combined feedbacks:
a. what about the effectiveness of
schematic vs. combined feedback.
b. Are schematics sufficient, or is a mix
sometimes better, even necessary?
Conclusion
Key Findings
● 3 types of feedbacks:
a. (i) Schematic Feedback by toolchain with status analysis code and a Classifier for short
sentences.
b. (ii) Discursive Feedback using Schematic Feedback infos, and (iii) Combined Feedback
whose exploits LLM (ChatGPT-4
● Combined Feedback is most effective in helping students
Implications
● Potential for broader application of LLMs in educational settings
● Importance of context-specific prompts for effective feedback

More Related Content

PPTX
(LLTC2024) feedback literacy chatgpt (Gozali dkk).pptx
PPT
Feedback literacy for automated feedback
PDF
Online Student Feedback System
PPTX
RALF (Redesigning Assessment and Learning with feedback in the VLEs) Project
PDF
The Potentials of Automated Feedback Systems for Instructors in Higher Educa...
PPTX
Presentation.pptx
PPTX
Technology Enhanced Feedback Approaches: What Works & Why?
PPTX
Creating learning environments for self-generated feedback to thrive
(LLTC2024) feedback literacy chatgpt (Gozali dkk).pptx
Feedback literacy for automated feedback
Online Student Feedback System
RALF (Redesigning Assessment and Learning with feedback in the VLEs) Project
The Potentials of Automated Feedback Systems for Instructors in Higher Educa...
Presentation.pptx
Technology Enhanced Feedback Approaches: What Works & Why?
Creating learning environments for self-generated feedback to thrive

Similar to Exploring the Impact of LLM-Generated Feedback (20)

PDF
Feedback at scale with a little help of my algorithms
PPT
Assessment and feedback re-designs for the generative AI era
PPTX
BULACAN STATE UNIVERSITY JOHN REINJOE FAJARDO NAMIT
PPTX
Learning Lunch Box Sept 2013 - Kris Ryan presentation
PPTX
Visionaryfeedbackpresentaitonreporting.pptx
PPTX
A collaborative learning approach to dialogic peer feedback a theoretical fra...
PPT
Towards making feedback processes satisfying for teachers and useful for stud...
PPTX
Making Connections - Students' Use of Past Feedback
PPTX
Making Connections: How Students Use Feedback to Inform Future Learning
PPTX
Feedback, Agency and Analytics in Virtual Learning Environments – Creating a ...
PPTX
ONLINE STUDENT FEEDBACK SYSTEM
PPT
Chapter 2
PDF
A Technology Enhanced Approach to Improving Feedback Satisfaction:
PDF
(2009) Providing Students with Feedback for Continuous Improvement
PPT
Technology-enabled learning-oriented assessment
PPT
Feedback to Students
PPTX
Rethinking student feedback
PDF
Advice For Action With Automatic Feedback Systems
PDF
Improving student engagement with the assessment process in undergraduate mic...
PDF
In Search of the Prompt that Produces useful Written Corrective Feedback for ...
Feedback at scale with a little help of my algorithms
Assessment and feedback re-designs for the generative AI era
BULACAN STATE UNIVERSITY JOHN REINJOE FAJARDO NAMIT
Learning Lunch Box Sept 2013 - Kris Ryan presentation
Visionaryfeedbackpresentaitonreporting.pptx
A collaborative learning approach to dialogic peer feedback a theoretical fra...
Towards making feedback processes satisfying for teachers and useful for stud...
Making Connections - Students' Use of Past Feedback
Making Connections: How Students Use Feedback to Inform Future Learning
Feedback, Agency and Analytics in Virtual Learning Environments – Creating a ...
ONLINE STUDENT FEEDBACK SYSTEM
Chapter 2
A Technology Enhanced Approach to Improving Feedback Satisfaction:
(2009) Providing Students with Feedback for Continuous Improvement
Technology-enabled learning-oriented assessment
Feedback to Students
Rethinking student feedback
Advice For Action With Automatic Feedback Systems
Improving student engagement with the assessment process in undergraduate mic...
In Search of the Prompt that Produces useful Written Corrective Feedback for ...
Ad

More from Ivan Letteri (6)

PDF
First Evaluation of an adaptive tool supporting formative assessment in data ...
PPTX
STEM-dallaLogicaAllaIA.pptx
PDF
FEMIB slides.pdf
PDF
Itasec2020
PDF
Feature Selection Strategies for HTTP Botnet Traffic Detection
PPTX
Botnet detection in SDN by DL techniques
First Evaluation of an adaptive tool supporting formative assessment in data ...
STEM-dallaLogicaAllaIA.pptx
FEMIB slides.pdf
Itasec2020
Feature Selection Strategies for HTTP Botnet Traffic Detection
Botnet detection in SDN by DL techniques
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

DOCX
Cambridge-Practice-Tests-for-IELTS-12.docx
PDF
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
PPTX
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
PDF
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
PDF
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
PDF
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
PDF
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
PPTX
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
PDF
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
PDF
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
PDF
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
PDF
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
PDF
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
PDF
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
PPTX
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
PDF
advance database management system book.pdf
PDF
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
PPTX
Computer Architecture Input Output Memory.pptx
Cambridge-Practice-Tests-for-IELTS-12.docx
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
advance database management system book.pdf
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
Computer Architecture Input Output Memory.pptx

Exploring the Impact of LLM-Generated Feedback

  • 1. 14th International Conference on Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning University of Salamanca (Spain) 26th-28th June, 2024
  • 2. Introduction ● Importance of Feedback in Education ○ Crucial for understanding and improving learning ○ Formative assessment enhances learning outcomes ● Objective of the Study ○ Assess the quality of three types of feedback: ■ Schematic Feedback (Traditional AI) ■ Discursive Feedback (LLM) ■ Combined Feedback (LLM + Schematic Feedback)
  • 3. Research Questions RQ1: How can we exploit Large Language Models (LLMs) to provide helpful feedback to students in our educational scenario? ● Objective: Investigate how effectively LLMs, such as ChatGPT-4, can be utilized to generate feedback that is both informative and supportive for students in data science courses. ● Approach: Compare traditional AI-generated feedback with feedback generated by LLMs and a combination of both, focusing on clarity, accuracy, and educational value. RQ2: What is the students' perception of the feedback provided? ● Objective: Understand the students' viewpoints on the usefulness, clarity, and overall quality of the feedback they receive. ● Approach: Collect and analyze student feedback through surveys and course evaluations, comparing their experiences with LLM-generated feedback against traditional feedback methods.
  • 4. Methodology - The Feedback
  • 5. Methodology - Schematic Feedback Schematic Feedback ● Technique: Toolchain compares correct solution with student's solution ● Feedback Generation: a couple of 3-ple a. list 1: (command_1, output_1, optionalComment_1) b. list 2: (command_2, output_2, optionalComment_2) Feedback comparison ● Step 1: Calculated a distance as an estimate of the final grade ● Step 2: Statistical analysis of code evaluates differences between command/output ratios by returning feedback on missing commands ● Step 3: classifier asserts the comment correctness returning feedback
  • 6. Methodology - LLM-generated Feedback ● Technique: Two types of feedback generated via chatGPT-4 a. 1st - discursive feedback: (i) student model, (ii) the exercise, (iii) given solution, (iv) chatGPT explain the mistakes b. 2nd - combine feedback: enriches the 1st with the schematic feedback
  • 7. Methodology - LLMgen -> Discursive Feedback ● Technique: Produced from a prompts built with schematic feedback informations ● Student Model: contains general ability in concept taught in the course estimated through the Rasch model
  • 8. Methodology - LLM gen -> Combined Feedback ● Technique: 2 types of feedback through chatGPT-4 a. feedback 1. prompt with (i) the student's model, (ii) the exercise (iii) the solution provided, and (iv) a sentence asking chatGPT to explain errors if any. b. feedback 2. enriches the prompt with the schematic feedback we saw earlier ● 3 steps evaluation: a. estimate of the final grade by a distance b. statistical analysis to evaluate command/output ratio c. a classifier asserts whether the comment is correct by returning feedback on correctness
  • 9. Evaluation by Teachers Objective: answering RQ1 comparing the 3 feedbacks ● RQ1.1: (i) Identify the best of the 3 feedbacks by the students in 60 wrong solutions. (ii) and asked two professors to evaluate the feedback deemed clear enough ● RQ1.2: Compares student and correct solutions
  • 10. Evaluation by Students Objective: answering RQ2 analysing LLM and SF & CF utility ● RQ2.1: (i) at the beginning of the course, evaluation usefulness of AI-feedback. (ii) before the exam, assessment of student experience with AI-feedback. ● RQ2.2: a couple of questions about Schematic & Combined feedbacks: a. what about the effectiveness of schematic vs. combined feedback. b. Are schematics sufficient, or is a mix sometimes better, even necessary?
  • 11. Conclusion Key Findings ● 3 types of feedbacks: a. (i) Schematic Feedback by toolchain with status analysis code and a Classifier for short sentences. b. (ii) Discursive Feedback using Schematic Feedback infos, and (iii) Combined Feedback whose exploits LLM (ChatGPT-4 ● Combined Feedback is most effective in helping students Implications ● Potential for broader application of LLMs in educational settings ● Importance of context-specific prompts for effective feedback