Finite Element Analysis of Bus Structure as per ECER29
0 likes27 views
1) The document presents a finite element analysis of a bus structure to improve crashworthiness and safety according to the ECER29 standard. 2) The baseline bus design did not meet ECER29 requirements as there was insufficient survival space between the dummy model and steering system during frontal impact simulations. 3) The researchers developed a modified design with two zones - a crumple zone to absorb impact energy and a driver compartment zone to resist deformation. Simulations of the modified design showed sufficient survival space, improving crashworthiness.
![International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 09 Issue: 03 | Mar 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 368
Finite Element Analysis of Bus Structure as per ECER29
Gaurav Dusane1, Kamlesh Gangrade2
1Sagar Institute of Research & Technology, Indore, India
2Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Sagar Institute of Research & Technology, Indore, India
---------------------------------------------------------------------***----------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract – As we know India is a developing country with
longest and busiest route in the world after USA so the road
accidents are always a huge issue on highways and every
year accident gross rate increases up to 1.5 percent. In India
road accidents are a leading cause of death with rank one
across 199 other countries. As per National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration accident statics 11,000 people have
lost their life in bus accident every year. There are some
common type of bus accident happed like frontal impact,
side impact, rear impact and rollover. Some case study on
crash worthiness shows that the frontal accident rate is
higher than any other fatality in bus accidents because
there is no crumple zone provided by thy bus manufacture.
So in case of frontal collision the energy absorption of the
frontal structure is very low and remaining impact energy
directly transferred to the occupant. So in this research
work we performed the frontal impact analysis of bus
structure as per ECER29 using finite element analysis.
Key Words: ECER29, FEM, crash worthiness
1. Introduction
The finite element analysis is a most popular method in
advanced automotive industry to solve complex engineering
problems including structural, fluid flow, thermal and
electromagnetic etc. FEM is type of numerical method for
solving partial differential equations, to solve any problem
Fem subdivide the system in to small elements by
discretization method [1] FEA generally helped as to reduce
the number of iteration during development process, the
explicit LS-Dyna code was used for this purpose.
As per ECER29 standards all automotive structure should be
design in such a way that at the time of accident the
minimum survival space is guaranteed. This standard
generally adopted by truck cabin structures only, standard
should not applicable for agriculture and construction
vehicle [2]. The legal requirements of driver cabin safety are
fixed in ECER29 regulation. The rigid surface with the area
of 2500X800 mm2 and the mass of 1500kg must be
positioned below 50mm to the R point of the driver seat. The
impact energy has to be in the rage of 45KJ as per vehicle
maximum permissible weight.
2. Objective
The objective of this research work is to design and analysis
of a bus structure to improve crashworthiness and avoid
injury at the time of accident.
3. Methodology
To start this study with research on various scenario of
accidents happen with buses and evaluate risk of injury
accordingly. Our work starts with CAD modeling then we
Export this cad data in STEP format and perform meshing
using finite element method after that applied boundary
condition as per ECER29 standard and check the survival
space between the dummy and steering system.
4. Bus super structure CAD model
CAD model prepared using creo software all dimensions are
in mm.
Dimensions – Maximum length – 8000MM
Maximum width – 2600 MM
Maximum Height – 3800MM
Seating Type - 2X2
Seating capacity – 32 seats](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/irjet-v9i367-220915120543-9c661f3c/85/Finite-Element-Analysis-of-Bus-Structure-as-per-ECER29-1-320.jpg)
![International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 09 Issue: 03 | Mar 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 370
After modification we got sufficient survival space between
dummy and steering column as shown in figure below.
8. Conclusion
The purpose of this study to perform frontal crash analysis
on bus structure as per ECER29 and try to improve the
crashworthiness and reduce risk of fatality. It was observed
that the baseline design doesn’t meet the ECER29, there is
no space between dummy and steering system. To avoid
failure and improve crashworthiness we develop two
different zones in front structure one is called crumple zone
and second one is called driver compartment zone as similar
to the passenger cars which can observe maximum
deformation energy.
9. References
[1] S. Vincze-Pap: Tests evaluation on passive safety
requirements for bus driver cabin (AUTÓKUT Test
Report, JÁ-244/80/14–1980)
[2] Dwivedi P, Kulkarni A, Chalipat S and Pardeshi M 2011
Protection devices to improve frontal pendulum
impact performance of heavy commercial vehicles
SAE Technical Paper
[3] Solah M S, Ariffin A H, Isa M and Wong S V 2013 In-
depth crash investigation on bus accidents in Malaysia
Journal of Society for Transportation and Traffic
Studies 3 (1):22-31.
[4] Jongpradist P 2015 Study on Frontal Impact
Crashworthiness for Passenger Bus Manufactured in
Thailand
[5] Raich H (2003) “Safety analysis of the new actros
megaspace cabin according to ECER29/02”, 4 th
European LS-DYNA Users Conference,
[6] Germany Sidhu, M.S. (2013), “Frontal Crash of Bus”,
2013 India Altair Technology Conference. Bangalore,
India.](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/irjet-v9i367-220915120543-9c661f3c/85/Finite-Element-Analysis-of-Bus-Structure-as-per-ECER29-3-320.jpg)
Finite Element Analysis of Bus Structure as per ECER29
- 1. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 09 Issue: 03 | Mar 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 368 Finite Element Analysis of Bus Structure as per ECER29 Gaurav Dusane1, Kamlesh Gangrade2 1Sagar Institute of Research & Technology, Indore, India 2Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Sagar Institute of Research & Technology, Indore, India ---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract – As we know India is a developing country with longest and busiest route in the world after USA so the road accidents are always a huge issue on highways and every year accident gross rate increases up to 1.5 percent. In India road accidents are a leading cause of death with rank one across 199 other countries. As per National Highway Traffic Safety Administration accident statics 11,000 people have lost their life in bus accident every year. There are some common type of bus accident happed like frontal impact, side impact, rear impact and rollover. Some case study on crash worthiness shows that the frontal accident rate is higher than any other fatality in bus accidents because there is no crumple zone provided by thy bus manufacture. So in case of frontal collision the energy absorption of the frontal structure is very low and remaining impact energy directly transferred to the occupant. So in this research work we performed the frontal impact analysis of bus structure as per ECER29 using finite element analysis. Key Words: ECER29, FEM, crash worthiness 1. Introduction The finite element analysis is a most popular method in advanced automotive industry to solve complex engineering problems including structural, fluid flow, thermal and electromagnetic etc. FEM is type of numerical method for solving partial differential equations, to solve any problem Fem subdivide the system in to small elements by discretization method [1] FEA generally helped as to reduce the number of iteration during development process, the explicit LS-Dyna code was used for this purpose. As per ECER29 standards all automotive structure should be design in such a way that at the time of accident the minimum survival space is guaranteed. This standard generally adopted by truck cabin structures only, standard should not applicable for agriculture and construction vehicle [2]. The legal requirements of driver cabin safety are fixed in ECER29 regulation. The rigid surface with the area of 2500X800 mm2 and the mass of 1500kg must be positioned below 50mm to the R point of the driver seat. The impact energy has to be in the rage of 45KJ as per vehicle maximum permissible weight. 2. Objective The objective of this research work is to design and analysis of a bus structure to improve crashworthiness and avoid injury at the time of accident. 3. Methodology To start this study with research on various scenario of accidents happen with buses and evaluate risk of injury accordingly. Our work starts with CAD modeling then we Export this cad data in STEP format and perform meshing using finite element method after that applied boundary condition as per ECER29 standard and check the survival space between the dummy and steering system. 4. Bus super structure CAD model CAD model prepared using creo software all dimensions are in mm. Dimensions – Maximum length – 8000MM Maximum width – 2600 MM Maximum Height – 3800MM Seating Type - 2X2 Seating capacity – 32 seats
- 2. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 09 Issue: 03 | Mar 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 369 5. Finite element analysis A finite element analysis is most common method for structural analysis using numerical technique called finite element method. This technique used to reduce number of prototype and improve product quality in design phase. Element quality criteria- 6. Boundary Condition - a. If vehicle GVW more than 7000kg, the impact energy should be in the range of 45KJ. b. Pendulum should be rectangular in shape (2500X800)mm with 1500 kg ± 250 of mass. c. Center of gravity of pendulum placed at 50 ±5mm below the R point of driver seat. 7. Results As per the AIS standard we evaluate the deformed shape of the structure found some deformation in frontal area and we can clearly observe the minimum space between the steering system and rigid dummy model.. In the way of crash worthiness improvement we develop two different zones in front structure one is called crumple zone and second one is called driver compartment zone as similar to the passenger cars. The crumple zone is made in such a way that can absorb maximum deformation energy and driver compartment zone designed to resist deformation.
- 3. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 09 Issue: 03 | Mar 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 370 After modification we got sufficient survival space between dummy and steering column as shown in figure below. 8. Conclusion The purpose of this study to perform frontal crash analysis on bus structure as per ECER29 and try to improve the crashworthiness and reduce risk of fatality. It was observed that the baseline design doesn’t meet the ECER29, there is no space between dummy and steering system. To avoid failure and improve crashworthiness we develop two different zones in front structure one is called crumple zone and second one is called driver compartment zone as similar to the passenger cars which can observe maximum deformation energy. 9. References [1] S. Vincze-Pap: Tests evaluation on passive safety requirements for bus driver cabin (AUTÓKUT Test Report, JÁ-244/80/14–1980) [2] Dwivedi P, Kulkarni A, Chalipat S and Pardeshi M 2011 Protection devices to improve frontal pendulum impact performance of heavy commercial vehicles SAE Technical Paper [3] Solah M S, Ariffin A H, Isa M and Wong S V 2013 In- depth crash investigation on bus accidents in Malaysia Journal of Society for Transportation and Traffic Studies 3 (1):22-31. [4] Jongpradist P 2015 Study on Frontal Impact Crashworthiness for Passenger Bus Manufactured in Thailand [5] Raich H (2003) “Safety analysis of the new actros megaspace cabin according to ECER29/02”, 4 th European LS-DYNA Users Conference, [6] Germany Sidhu, M.S. (2013), “Frontal Crash of Bus”, 2013 India Altair Technology Conference. Bangalore, India.