SlideShare a Scribd company logo
3
Most read
7
Most read
8
Most read
Soran University
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Petroleum Engineering
Fluid Mechanic
Title: Venturi Meter
Experiment No.: 5
Name: Muhammad Sulaimon Rasul
Group: A1
Date: 14/11/2019
Supervisors: Mr. Shahab, Mr. Sarkar, Mrs. Marriam, Mr. Balen
Contents
Aim………………………………………………………………………………………….…….1
Theory…………………………………………………………………………………….…….…1
Apparatus…………………………………………………………...…………………………..…3
Procedure………………………………………………………………………………………….4
Calculation………………………………………………………………………………...………5
Result and Discussion……………………………………………………………………………..6
Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………...7
References…………………………………………………………………………………………8
List of Figures
Figure 1 Venturi Meter………….…………….………………………….....….….……….….…2
Figure 2 Graph between flow rate and pressure loss …………………….....….….……….….…6
List of Tables
Table 1 Theorical Results……………………………………………..…………………………..5
Table 2 Experimental and Theorical Results……………………………….……………………..5
Aim
This experiment tends to obtain both compressible and incompressible fluids in a pipe line, and
graph between flow rate and pressure loss.
Theory
A Venturi Meter is basically used to measure the volumetric flow rate of a fluid. Sometimes an
amount of pressure drop occurs in pipelines due to the reduction in flow passage, which depends
on geometrical parameters such convergent cone angle, divergent cone angle, diameter ratio and
throat length of Venture and properties of the fluid. In industries like chemical, papers, minerals
processing, oil and gas, etc., which they require an accurate flow measurement and controlling it.
A Venturi-Meter is used because of its accuracy of measuring fluid flow rate using a Bernoulli’s
principle work which illustrate that the velocity of a fluid increases with decreasing the pressure.
However, the device has studied by researchers for different purpose. (Elperin et al, 2002).
Inside the Venturi-Meter a pressure difference is created by changing the flow passage cross
sectional area, while the pressure difference helps in determination of the discharge flow rate
through the pipe line. The throat pass area of the Venturi meter is smaller than the inlet cross
sectional area of the Venturi. When a fluid passes through a Venturi mere, will cause the flow to
pressure drop between the inlet and cylindrical throat of Venturi Meter. The pressure drop can be
measured using a differential pressure measuring instrument. The differential pressure instrument
can be configured in order to exhibit and display the flow rate instead of differential pressure
(Herschel, 1888).
A Venturi mainly has three parts, an inlet section followed by converging cone. A circular throat,
a diverging cone followed by an outlet section. Normally the diameter of the inlet section and
outlet section are the same (Modi et al, 2009). The following equations can be used to determine
the theorical flow rate in the Venturi:
…………..…………………………..…………………………………(1)
Qactual = LxWxH/t …………………………………………………………………………………(2)
1
Cd = Qactual/Qtheory ………………………………………………………………..…………(3)
Pressure Loss = ϒh ……………………………………………………………………………..(4)
Where:
AD: Cross sectional area of the smallest part of venturi.
AA: Cross sectional area of hA in venturi.
g: Gravity acceleration (9.81m/s2).
hA: High of h in m.
hD: High of h in smallest cross-sectional area.
L: Length of storage (0.73m).
W: Width of storage (0.3m).
H: High of water in storage.
t: Time in seconds.
Cd: Discharge coefficient.
ϒ: Specific weight
h: Hight of manometer.
2
Apparatus and Materials
Apparatus
• Venturi meter apparatus: Is a device used to measure flow rate. Shown in Figure 1.
Materials
• Water.
Figure 1 Venturi Meter Apparatus
3
Procedure
1. The apparatus was leveled by opening both the Bench Supply valve and the control valve
downstream of the meter to allow water to flow and clear air pockets from the supply hose.
This was achieved by connecting the apparatus to a power supply.
2. The control valve was then gradually closed causing water to rise up in the tubes of the
manometer thereby compressing the air contained in the manifold.
3. When the water level had risen to a convenient height, the bench valve was also closed
gradually so that as both valves are finally shut off, the meter was left containing static
water at moderate pressure.
4. The adjustable screws were operated to give identical reading for all of the tubes across the
whole width of the manometer board. To establish the meter coefficient measurements of
a set of differential heads (h1-h2) and flow rate Q were made.
5. The first reading was taken with the maximum possible value when (h2 – h1) i.e. with h1
close to the top of the scale and h2 near to the bottom. This was obtained by gradually
opening both the bench valve and the control valve in turn.
6. Successive opening of either valve increased both the flow and the difference between h1
and h2. The rate of flow was found by timing the collection of a known amount of water
in the weighing tank, in the meantime valves h1 and h2 was read from the manometer.
Similarly, readings were then taken over a series of reducing values of h1 – h2 roughly
equally spread over the available range from 250mm to zero. About ten readings sufficed.
4
Calculation
5
Result and Discussion
Table 1 Experimental Results
Table 2 Theorical and Experimental Results
Figure 2 Graph between flow rate and pressure loss
Regarding to the Table 1, the flow rate has been changed 4 times with opening and closing the
discharge valve and the high of “H” recorded in each flow rate. The cross-sectional areas are
No AD(m2) AA(m2)
H (Q1)
(cm)
H (Q2)
(cm)
H (Q3)
(cm)
H (Q4)
(cm)
H (Q5)
(cm)
H (Q6)
(cm)
H (Q7)
(cm)
1 2.01x10-4
5.3x10-4
31.5 31 30.8 25.5 28 29.5 30
2 2.01x10-4
5.3x10-4
28 27 25 13 18.5 21 22
3 2.01x10-4
5.3x10-4
25.5 24.5 23 9.5 16 19 19.5
4 2.01x10-4
5.3x10-4
24 23.5 21.5 7 14.5 17 17.5
No
Qactual
(m3
/s)
Qtheory
(m3
/s)
Cd R% Cd avg
Pressure
Loss (Pa)
1 1.53x10-4
2.35x10-4
0.652 75
0.624
75
2 2.19x10-4
3.725x10-4
0.588 60 60
3 2.49x10-4
3.847x10-4
0.649 62.5 62.5
4 2.41x10-4
3.96x10-4
0.607 61.76 61.76
6
known for each high (H) on Venturi meter. After recording the first train, the discharge valve will
be opened more and another time the heights will be recorded for 3 more trains which showed a
decay of heights due to reduction of pressure and increase in velocity. Figure 2 shows a differential
height for 4 trains according to their pressure loss. In Table 2 the theorical flow rate has been
calculated one time using the Equ.1 for each train, and actual flow rate has been calculated one
time using the Equ.2 for each test. At last the discharge coefficient (Cd) has been calculated using
Equ.3 for each test. And the average was taken in order to compare with the device’s Cd which its
0.8-0.9. Since, the results show that there is an error in calculating flowrates that may due to the
pressure loss from a safety valve in a manometer and bubbles that inserted to the manometer tubes
due to the low efficiency of motor pump. And the pressure loss has been recorded via the Equ.4
for each test which shows a high difference between first and second test which maybe pressure
loss occurred in safety valve addition to discharge valve.
Conclusion
This experiment can conclude that, A Venturi meter can be used to determine the flow rate in the
pipelines and the pressure loss that occurring in order to control the discharge fluid addition to the
discharge coefficient of a Venturi meter.
7
References
Dr. P.N. Modi and Dr. S.M. Seth, (2009): Hydraulics and Fluid Mechanics Including Hydraulic
Machines (In SI Units), Fifth Edition, Rajsons Publications PVT. LTD., Delhi-110006.
Herschel, (1888): Apparatus for Measuring the Quantity of Water Flowing in a Pipe, U.S. patent
number US381.
T. Elperin, A. Fominykh, M. Klochko, (2002): Performance of a Venturi meter in gas–liquid flow in
the presence of dissolved gases. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation. Pp 13–16.
Figure Reference
Fraser, D.M., R. Pillay, L. Tjatindi, and J.M. Case, (2007): “Enhancing the Learning of fluid
Mechanics using Computer Simulations,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 96, No. 4.
8

More Related Content

PDF
Wind Tunnel Report
PDF
Fluid Mechanic Lab - Reynold's Number Experiment
PDF
Single effect evaporation
DOCX
Radial Heat conduction.docx
PDF
Impact of jet
PDF
Air Conditioning System
PPTX
أعمال الطرق - Road Works
PPTX
Hyperloop ppt
Wind Tunnel Report
Fluid Mechanic Lab - Reynold's Number Experiment
Single effect evaporation
Radial Heat conduction.docx
Impact of jet
Air Conditioning System
أعمال الطرق - Road Works
Hyperloop ppt

What's hot (20)

PDF
Fluid Mechanic Lab - Bernoulli Equation
DOCX
Reynolds Number Final Report in LAB 1
DOCX
Deflection of simply supported beam and cantilever
PDF
lab report structure deflection of cantilever
PDF
Fluid Mechanic Lab - Hydrostatic Pressure
PDF
LAB REPORT SHEAR FORCE IN A BEAM
DOCX
Pelton wheel experiment
PDF
friction loss along a pipe
PDF
Fluid mechanics Lab Report
DOCX
Sieving Final Report
DOCX
Hydrostatic force
PDF
Fluid Mechanics Chapter 2. Fluid Statics
PDF
lab report structure continuous beam
PPTX
Flow through orifice meter
PPT
flow through venturimeter
PDF
Stability of A Floating Body | Jameel Academy
PPTX
flow in pipe series and parallel
DOCX
exp.9 flow meter demonstration
PDF
design of pressure vessel (thick and thin cylinders) may 2020
PDF
Fluid Mechanics. Chapter 1. Introduction to Fluid Mechanics
Fluid Mechanic Lab - Bernoulli Equation
Reynolds Number Final Report in LAB 1
Deflection of simply supported beam and cantilever
lab report structure deflection of cantilever
Fluid Mechanic Lab - Hydrostatic Pressure
LAB REPORT SHEAR FORCE IN A BEAM
Pelton wheel experiment
friction loss along a pipe
Fluid mechanics Lab Report
Sieving Final Report
Hydrostatic force
Fluid Mechanics Chapter 2. Fluid Statics
lab report structure continuous beam
Flow through orifice meter
flow through venturimeter
Stability of A Floating Body | Jameel Academy
flow in pipe series and parallel
exp.9 flow meter demonstration
design of pressure vessel (thick and thin cylinders) may 2020
Fluid Mechanics. Chapter 1. Introduction to Fluid Mechanics
Ad

Similar to Fluid Mechanic Lab - Venturi Meter (20)

PDF
Over all pressure of Fluid flow
PDF
Fluid Flow Rate & Bernoulli’s Theorem Demonstration
PDF
Exp 10 flow rate
PDF
Exp 10 flow_rate
PDF
Bernoulli equation
PDF
Rutenbeck; GLR Pressure Drop
DOCX
Energy losses in Bends, loss coefficient related to velocity head.Pelton Whee...
PDF
Venturi and orificemeter - Ed Ryan Ruales
PDF
Fm lab manual
PDF
exp.9 flow meter demonstration
PDF
0exp11 pipe friction_01
PPTX
d-2.pptx
DOCX
Calibration of venturi and orifice meters
PDF
Calibration of Venturi and Orifice Meters
PDF
Practica no.1
PPTX
FLOW(NEW).pptx .
PDF
Dead – Weight piston gauge & Center of Pressure
PDF
Exp. No 6 Static and dynamic pressure.pdf
PDF
Experimental Investigations and Computational Analysis on Subsonic Wind Tunnel
Over all pressure of Fluid flow
Fluid Flow Rate & Bernoulli’s Theorem Demonstration
Exp 10 flow rate
Exp 10 flow_rate
Bernoulli equation
Rutenbeck; GLR Pressure Drop
Energy losses in Bends, loss coefficient related to velocity head.Pelton Whee...
Venturi and orificemeter - Ed Ryan Ruales
Fm lab manual
exp.9 flow meter demonstration
0exp11 pipe friction_01
d-2.pptx
Calibration of venturi and orifice meters
Calibration of Venturi and Orifice Meters
Practica no.1
FLOW(NEW).pptx .
Dead – Weight piston gauge & Center of Pressure
Exp. No 6 Static and dynamic pressure.pdf
Experimental Investigations and Computational Analysis on Subsonic Wind Tunnel
Ad

More from MuhammadSRaniYah (11)

PDF
Drilling Lab - pH Meter Measurement
PDF
Drilling Lab - Sand Content
PDF
Drilling Lab - Mud Filtration
PDF
Drilling Lab - Gel Strength
PDF
Drilling Lab - Drilling Fluid Viscometer
PDF
Drilling Lab - Mud Weight Balancing
PDF
Fluid Mechanic Lab - Hydrostatic Pressure
PDF
Fluid Mechanic Lab - Hydrometer or Aerometer
PDF
Drilling Lab - Marsh Funnel Viscometer
PDF
Drilling Lab - Mud Dilution
PDF
Drilling Lab - Mud Weighting
Drilling Lab - pH Meter Measurement
Drilling Lab - Sand Content
Drilling Lab - Mud Filtration
Drilling Lab - Gel Strength
Drilling Lab - Drilling Fluid Viscometer
Drilling Lab - Mud Weight Balancing
Fluid Mechanic Lab - Hydrostatic Pressure
Fluid Mechanic Lab - Hydrometer or Aerometer
Drilling Lab - Marsh Funnel Viscometer
Drilling Lab - Mud Dilution
Drilling Lab - Mud Weighting

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
CARTOGRAPHY AND GEOINFORMATION VISUALIZATION chapter1 NPTE (2).pptx
PDF
Well-logging-methods_new................
PPTX
MCN 401 KTU-2019-PPE KITS-MODULE 2.pptx
PPTX
bas. eng. economics group 4 presentation 1.pptx
PPTX
MET 305 2019 SCHEME MODULE 2 COMPLETE.pptx
PDF
Mohammad Mahdi Farshadian CV - Prospective PhD Student 2026
PPTX
Lesson 3_Tessellation.pptx finite Mathematics
PDF
Structs to JSON How Go Powers REST APIs.pdf
PDF
composite construction of structures.pdf
PPTX
additive manufacturing of ss316l using mig welding
PDF
July 2025 - Top 10 Read Articles in International Journal of Software Enginee...
PDF
Model Code of Practice - Construction Work - 21102022 .pdf
PPT
Mechanical Engineering MATERIALS Selection
PDF
The CXO Playbook 2025 – Future-Ready Strategies for C-Suite Leaders Cerebrai...
PPT
Project quality management in manufacturing
PPTX
M Tech Sem 1 Civil Engineering Environmental Sciences.pptx
PDF
Operating System & Kernel Study Guide-1 - converted.pdf
PPTX
Sustainable Sites - Green Building Construction
PPTX
Infosys Presentation by1.Riyan Bagwan 2.Samadhan Naiknavare 3.Gaurav Shinde 4...
PPTX
Lecture Notes Electrical Wiring System Components
CARTOGRAPHY AND GEOINFORMATION VISUALIZATION chapter1 NPTE (2).pptx
Well-logging-methods_new................
MCN 401 KTU-2019-PPE KITS-MODULE 2.pptx
bas. eng. economics group 4 presentation 1.pptx
MET 305 2019 SCHEME MODULE 2 COMPLETE.pptx
Mohammad Mahdi Farshadian CV - Prospective PhD Student 2026
Lesson 3_Tessellation.pptx finite Mathematics
Structs to JSON How Go Powers REST APIs.pdf
composite construction of structures.pdf
additive manufacturing of ss316l using mig welding
July 2025 - Top 10 Read Articles in International Journal of Software Enginee...
Model Code of Practice - Construction Work - 21102022 .pdf
Mechanical Engineering MATERIALS Selection
The CXO Playbook 2025 – Future-Ready Strategies for C-Suite Leaders Cerebrai...
Project quality management in manufacturing
M Tech Sem 1 Civil Engineering Environmental Sciences.pptx
Operating System & Kernel Study Guide-1 - converted.pdf
Sustainable Sites - Green Building Construction
Infosys Presentation by1.Riyan Bagwan 2.Samadhan Naiknavare 3.Gaurav Shinde 4...
Lecture Notes Electrical Wiring System Components

Fluid Mechanic Lab - Venturi Meter

  • 1. Soran University Faculty of Engineering Department of Petroleum Engineering Fluid Mechanic Title: Venturi Meter Experiment No.: 5 Name: Muhammad Sulaimon Rasul Group: A1 Date: 14/11/2019 Supervisors: Mr. Shahab, Mr. Sarkar, Mrs. Marriam, Mr. Balen
  • 2. Contents Aim………………………………………………………………………………………….…….1 Theory…………………………………………………………………………………….…….…1 Apparatus…………………………………………………………...…………………………..…3 Procedure………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Calculation………………………………………………………………………………...………5 Result and Discussion……………………………………………………………………………..6 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………...7 References…………………………………………………………………………………………8 List of Figures Figure 1 Venturi Meter………….…………….………………………….....….….……….….…2 Figure 2 Graph between flow rate and pressure loss …………………….....….….……….….…6 List of Tables Table 1 Theorical Results……………………………………………..…………………………..5 Table 2 Experimental and Theorical Results……………………………….……………………..5
  • 3. Aim This experiment tends to obtain both compressible and incompressible fluids in a pipe line, and graph between flow rate and pressure loss. Theory A Venturi Meter is basically used to measure the volumetric flow rate of a fluid. Sometimes an amount of pressure drop occurs in pipelines due to the reduction in flow passage, which depends on geometrical parameters such convergent cone angle, divergent cone angle, diameter ratio and throat length of Venture and properties of the fluid. In industries like chemical, papers, minerals processing, oil and gas, etc., which they require an accurate flow measurement and controlling it. A Venturi-Meter is used because of its accuracy of measuring fluid flow rate using a Bernoulli’s principle work which illustrate that the velocity of a fluid increases with decreasing the pressure. However, the device has studied by researchers for different purpose. (Elperin et al, 2002). Inside the Venturi-Meter a pressure difference is created by changing the flow passage cross sectional area, while the pressure difference helps in determination of the discharge flow rate through the pipe line. The throat pass area of the Venturi meter is smaller than the inlet cross sectional area of the Venturi. When a fluid passes through a Venturi mere, will cause the flow to pressure drop between the inlet and cylindrical throat of Venturi Meter. The pressure drop can be measured using a differential pressure measuring instrument. The differential pressure instrument can be configured in order to exhibit and display the flow rate instead of differential pressure (Herschel, 1888). A Venturi mainly has three parts, an inlet section followed by converging cone. A circular throat, a diverging cone followed by an outlet section. Normally the diameter of the inlet section and outlet section are the same (Modi et al, 2009). The following equations can be used to determine the theorical flow rate in the Venturi: …………..…………………………..…………………………………(1) Qactual = LxWxH/t …………………………………………………………………………………(2) 1
  • 4. Cd = Qactual/Qtheory ………………………………………………………………..…………(3) Pressure Loss = ϒh ……………………………………………………………………………..(4) Where: AD: Cross sectional area of the smallest part of venturi. AA: Cross sectional area of hA in venturi. g: Gravity acceleration (9.81m/s2). hA: High of h in m. hD: High of h in smallest cross-sectional area. L: Length of storage (0.73m). W: Width of storage (0.3m). H: High of water in storage. t: Time in seconds. Cd: Discharge coefficient. ϒ: Specific weight h: Hight of manometer. 2
  • 5. Apparatus and Materials Apparatus • Venturi meter apparatus: Is a device used to measure flow rate. Shown in Figure 1. Materials • Water. Figure 1 Venturi Meter Apparatus 3
  • 6. Procedure 1. The apparatus was leveled by opening both the Bench Supply valve and the control valve downstream of the meter to allow water to flow and clear air pockets from the supply hose. This was achieved by connecting the apparatus to a power supply. 2. The control valve was then gradually closed causing water to rise up in the tubes of the manometer thereby compressing the air contained in the manifold. 3. When the water level had risen to a convenient height, the bench valve was also closed gradually so that as both valves are finally shut off, the meter was left containing static water at moderate pressure. 4. The adjustable screws were operated to give identical reading for all of the tubes across the whole width of the manometer board. To establish the meter coefficient measurements of a set of differential heads (h1-h2) and flow rate Q were made. 5. The first reading was taken with the maximum possible value when (h2 – h1) i.e. with h1 close to the top of the scale and h2 near to the bottom. This was obtained by gradually opening both the bench valve and the control valve in turn. 6. Successive opening of either valve increased both the flow and the difference between h1 and h2. The rate of flow was found by timing the collection of a known amount of water in the weighing tank, in the meantime valves h1 and h2 was read from the manometer. Similarly, readings were then taken over a series of reducing values of h1 – h2 roughly equally spread over the available range from 250mm to zero. About ten readings sufficed. 4
  • 8. Result and Discussion Table 1 Experimental Results Table 2 Theorical and Experimental Results Figure 2 Graph between flow rate and pressure loss Regarding to the Table 1, the flow rate has been changed 4 times with opening and closing the discharge valve and the high of “H” recorded in each flow rate. The cross-sectional areas are No AD(m2) AA(m2) H (Q1) (cm) H (Q2) (cm) H (Q3) (cm) H (Q4) (cm) H (Q5) (cm) H (Q6) (cm) H (Q7) (cm) 1 2.01x10-4 5.3x10-4 31.5 31 30.8 25.5 28 29.5 30 2 2.01x10-4 5.3x10-4 28 27 25 13 18.5 21 22 3 2.01x10-4 5.3x10-4 25.5 24.5 23 9.5 16 19 19.5 4 2.01x10-4 5.3x10-4 24 23.5 21.5 7 14.5 17 17.5 No Qactual (m3 /s) Qtheory (m3 /s) Cd R% Cd avg Pressure Loss (Pa) 1 1.53x10-4 2.35x10-4 0.652 75 0.624 75 2 2.19x10-4 3.725x10-4 0.588 60 60 3 2.49x10-4 3.847x10-4 0.649 62.5 62.5 4 2.41x10-4 3.96x10-4 0.607 61.76 61.76 6
  • 9. known for each high (H) on Venturi meter. After recording the first train, the discharge valve will be opened more and another time the heights will be recorded for 3 more trains which showed a decay of heights due to reduction of pressure and increase in velocity. Figure 2 shows a differential height for 4 trains according to their pressure loss. In Table 2 the theorical flow rate has been calculated one time using the Equ.1 for each train, and actual flow rate has been calculated one time using the Equ.2 for each test. At last the discharge coefficient (Cd) has been calculated using Equ.3 for each test. And the average was taken in order to compare with the device’s Cd which its 0.8-0.9. Since, the results show that there is an error in calculating flowrates that may due to the pressure loss from a safety valve in a manometer and bubbles that inserted to the manometer tubes due to the low efficiency of motor pump. And the pressure loss has been recorded via the Equ.4 for each test which shows a high difference between first and second test which maybe pressure loss occurred in safety valve addition to discharge valve. Conclusion This experiment can conclude that, A Venturi meter can be used to determine the flow rate in the pipelines and the pressure loss that occurring in order to control the discharge fluid addition to the discharge coefficient of a Venturi meter. 7
  • 10. References Dr. P.N. Modi and Dr. S.M. Seth, (2009): Hydraulics and Fluid Mechanics Including Hydraulic Machines (In SI Units), Fifth Edition, Rajsons Publications PVT. LTD., Delhi-110006. Herschel, (1888): Apparatus for Measuring the Quantity of Water Flowing in a Pipe, U.S. patent number US381. T. Elperin, A. Fominykh, M. Klochko, (2002): Performance of a Venturi meter in gas–liquid flow in the presence of dissolved gases. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation. Pp 13–16. Figure Reference Fraser, D.M., R. Pillay, L. Tjatindi, and J.M. Case, (2007): “Enhancing the Learning of fluid Mechanics using Computer Simulations,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 96, No. 4. 8