SlideShare a Scribd company logo
UiTM/FSKM/CS/FYP/PVF/2012
STUDENT NAME STUDENT ID
PROGRAM
SUPERVISOR
PROJECT TITLE
HANDOVER DATE
Assessment Criteria
Weight
(W)
Score
(S)
(1-10)
Marks
(W*S)
1. Abstract
(Summarizes the whole project – consists of project motivation, methodology, findings
and future work.)
1
2. Introduction
(Appropriate title; clear problem statement; well-defined project scope; clear,
measurable and achievable objectives; and significant to the community and
practitioners.)
2
3. Literature Review
(Review of current, related literature and research reports. Consist of relevant, correct
facts and substantial references - able to identify, collect, summarize and analyze
relevant and latest/issues of subject matter.)
3
4. Methodology
(A detailed and in depth explanation of the appropriate approach, methods, sources
and deliverables in accomplishing the project.)
4
5. Results / Findings/ Prototype
(The result of research carried out to solve the problem defined. This may include
analysis, usability, design, implementation, testing, prototype or framework.)
5
6. Conclusion and Recommendations
(Conclusion of what has been achieved, explaining limitations/problems and
recommendation for future work.)
2
7. Report Presentation
(Structure, organisation and standard report format. Clarity of language, consistency
of the content, logical flow and use of figurative language for all materials.)
2
8. References and Citations
(Standard citation and references based on the guideline given. Valid source of
references and other appropriate supporting documents.)
1
9. Progress Evaluation (supervisor only)
(This may include supervisory meetings (Project In-Progress Form-F3), supervisory
independency, responsibilities, commitment, maturity, etc.)
2
Comments:
Supervisor (50%) Examiner (40%)
Name of Supervisor/Examiner: Date:
Signature:
F7 - PROJECT REPORT EVALUATION FORM
CSP650 Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences

More Related Content

PPTX
Chapter 3
PPTX
Research design
PPTX
Research Process Explained
ODP
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
PPT
International comparisons in senior secondary assessments
PDF
NIH Grant Proposals (SF 424): K08 - K23 Applications and Individual Career De...
PDF
How to Craft the "Significance” & "Innovation" Sections of a Grant Applicatio...
PPTX
Mixed research
Chapter 3
Research design
Research Process Explained
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
International comparisons in senior secondary assessments
NIH Grant Proposals (SF 424): K08 - K23 Applications and Individual Career De...
How to Craft the "Significance” & "Innovation" Sections of a Grant Applicatio...
Mixed research

What's hot (19)

PDF
How to Structure the “Approach” Section of a Grant Application (Filler 2020)
PDF
How to Write the “Specific Aims” Section of a Grant Application (Duru 2020)
PDF
How to Structure the “Approach” Section of a Grant Application (2020)
PPTX
Case studies
PPTX
Key stages of systematic review
PDF
Thesis defense sample
PDF
Feedback on the draft summary report
PDF
Business research methods
PPTX
steps of research process
PPTX
Evaluation-based advice with uncertain evidence
PPT
Design research
PDF
How to Craft the "Significance” & "Innovation" Sections of a Grant Applicatio...
PPTX
Systematic review
PPTX
Exploring Gender Differences in the Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experi...
PPTX
Challenges and opportunities in research evaluation: toward a better evaluati...
PDF
Live innovation.org 4.-defining-the-research-plan-research-design-mind-map
PPTX
Secondary Research
PPTX
Scientific proposal writing
PPTX
Basics of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Part 2
How to Structure the “Approach” Section of a Grant Application (Filler 2020)
How to Write the “Specific Aims” Section of a Grant Application (Duru 2020)
How to Structure the “Approach” Section of a Grant Application (2020)
Case studies
Key stages of systematic review
Thesis defense sample
Feedback on the draft summary report
Business research methods
steps of research process
Evaluation-based advice with uncertain evidence
Design research
How to Craft the "Significance” & "Innovation" Sections of a Grant Applicatio...
Systematic review
Exploring Gender Differences in the Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experi...
Challenges and opportunities in research evaluation: toward a better evaluati...
Live innovation.org 4.-defining-the-research-plan-research-design-mind-map
Secondary Research
Scientific proposal writing
Basics of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Part 2
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PDF
Embassy of Sweden - NETFUND END OF PROJECT EVALUATION REPORT
DOCX
Worsham evaluation proposal project
PPT
Exemplar Evaluation Report
DOCX
ENBE FINAL PROJECT REPORT PROPOSAL TOWN
PPTX
Evaluation proposal
PDF
Pontis Foundation Sote ICT Project Evaluation Report
PDF
CADRA Project - Program Evaluation Final Report 2015
PDF
Final Project Report - The Evaluation and Expansion of the Solar Disinfection...
DOCX
project report on business proposal
PPTX
Evaluating a Humanitarian Action Proposal
PDF
PPTX
Proposal & Grant Writing
DOC
Proposal evaluation-criteria-rubric smaller margins
PPTX
Feasibility report
PPTX
PPTX
Proposal for Evaluation
PPT
Data Mining Concepts and Techniques, Chapter 10. Cluster Analysis: Basic Conc...
PPTX
Introduction to Quantitative Research Methods
PPS
Itt project
Embassy of Sweden - NETFUND END OF PROJECT EVALUATION REPORT
Worsham evaluation proposal project
Exemplar Evaluation Report
ENBE FINAL PROJECT REPORT PROPOSAL TOWN
Evaluation proposal
Pontis Foundation Sote ICT Project Evaluation Report
CADRA Project - Program Evaluation Final Report 2015
Final Project Report - The Evaluation and Expansion of the Solar Disinfection...
project report on business proposal
Evaluating a Humanitarian Action Proposal
Proposal & Grant Writing
Proposal evaluation-criteria-rubric smaller margins
Feasibility report
Proposal for Evaluation
Data Mining Concepts and Techniques, Chapter 10. Cluster Analysis: Basic Conc...
Introduction to Quantitative Research Methods
Itt project
Ad

Similar to Form 7 -_project_report_evaluation_form_2012_v1 (6)

PDF
Introduction_of_underagratuate_projects.pdf
PDF
internship for 6 months
DOCX
Updated Template-05 - Project Report (part-1).docx
DOCX
CS project notes 1 Notes for Final Project Dissertation .docx
DOCX
FINAL COURSE PROJECT PRESENTATION (SIGNATURE ASSIGNMENT)You .docx
PPTX
Evaluation and plan update.pptx
Introduction_of_underagratuate_projects.pdf
internship for 6 months
Updated Template-05 - Project Report (part-1).docx
CS project notes 1 Notes for Final Project Dissertation .docx
FINAL COURSE PROJECT PRESENTATION (SIGNATURE ASSIGNMENT)You .docx
Evaluation and plan update.pptx

Form 7 -_project_report_evaluation_form_2012_v1

  • 1. UiTM/FSKM/CS/FYP/PVF/2012 STUDENT NAME STUDENT ID PROGRAM SUPERVISOR PROJECT TITLE HANDOVER DATE Assessment Criteria Weight (W) Score (S) (1-10) Marks (W*S) 1. Abstract (Summarizes the whole project – consists of project motivation, methodology, findings and future work.) 1 2. Introduction (Appropriate title; clear problem statement; well-defined project scope; clear, measurable and achievable objectives; and significant to the community and practitioners.) 2 3. Literature Review (Review of current, related literature and research reports. Consist of relevant, correct facts and substantial references - able to identify, collect, summarize and analyze relevant and latest/issues of subject matter.) 3 4. Methodology (A detailed and in depth explanation of the appropriate approach, methods, sources and deliverables in accomplishing the project.) 4 5. Results / Findings/ Prototype (The result of research carried out to solve the problem defined. This may include analysis, usability, design, implementation, testing, prototype or framework.) 5 6. Conclusion and Recommendations (Conclusion of what has been achieved, explaining limitations/problems and recommendation for future work.) 2 7. Report Presentation (Structure, organisation and standard report format. Clarity of language, consistency of the content, logical flow and use of figurative language for all materials.) 2 8. References and Citations (Standard citation and references based on the guideline given. Valid source of references and other appropriate supporting documents.) 1 9. Progress Evaluation (supervisor only) (This may include supervisory meetings (Project In-Progress Form-F3), supervisory independency, responsibilities, commitment, maturity, etc.) 2 Comments: Supervisor (50%) Examiner (40%) Name of Supervisor/Examiner: Date: Signature: F7 - PROJECT REPORT EVALUATION FORM CSP650 Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences