2
Most read
7
Most read
15
Most read
FORMING, STORMING, 
NORMING, PERFORMING, 
AND ADJOURNING 
1 
Managers are people who do things right, while leaders are people 
who do the right thing. – Warren Bennis, Ph.D. "On Becoming a Leader" 
Glen B. Alleman, 2003
Introduction 
¨ Forming – team members are introduced to each other, 
each positioning from specialist Point of View 
¨ Storming – the team transitions from “as is” to “to be” y 
articulating shared outcome 
¨ Norming – the team reaches consensus on the “to be” 
process and the a shared outcome 
¨ Performing – the team has settled its relationships and 
expectations of each other with mutual accountability 
¨ Adjourning – the team shares the improved processes with 
others 
2
Staged Development of Teams 
¨ The Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing stages are seemingly obvious, 
but are in fact difficult. 
¤ Participants want to move to the Performing stage without passing through the 
first three stages. 
¤ The Forming stage is relatively easy. 
¤ The Storming stage is difficult and many times the cause of the team’s failure. 
¤ Performing seems easy once the storming process is complete. 
¨ The “Real” problem is how to identify when a stage is complete: 
¤ The team members agree that the stage is complete? 
¤ The team coach agrees the stage is complete? 
¤ The team simply moves on to the next stage? 
¨ The definition of the “exit criteria” between stages needs to be worked out 
prior to the team’s reaching the end of the stage. 
¤ This again, seems obvious but is also very difficult. 
3
Forming 
4 
¨ The “polite” stage in which the team starts to form. 
¨ Everyone is trying to figure out what the team 
concept is, what their role is, how they are going to 
hang on to their power base. 
¨ Initial “silent” leaders may take the reins. 
¨ The team is usually positive – for the most part – for 
the initial meetings. 
¨ No one has offended anyone at this point yet!
Forming 
¨ Forming includes feelings and behaviors of: 
¤ Excitement, anticipation, and optimism. 
¤ Pride in being chosen for the project. 
¤ A tentative attachment to the team Suspicion and anxiety about the job. 
¤ Defining the tasks and how they will be accomplished. 
¤ Determining acceptable group behavior. 
¤ Deciding what information needs to be gathered. 
¤ Abstract discussions of the concepts and issues, and for some members, 
impatience with these discussions. There will be difficulty in identifying 
some of the relevant problems. 
¨ Because there is so much going on to distract members' 
attention in the beginning, the team accomplishes little, if 
anything, that concerns it's project goals. This is perfectly 
normal. 
¨ Exit Criteria? 
5
Storming 
¨ The honeymoon is over. 
¨ The silent leaders may be clashing for control of the 
group. 
¤ They must become Team Members and give up their 
previous Command and Control Leadership paradigm 
¨ People disagree and may blame the team concept, 
saying it doesn’t work. 
¨ Management needs to do a lot of coaching to get 
people to work past their differences, may take 
separate 1-on-1’s with people. 
¨ Selecting high maturity members is a critical success 
factor for Teaming. 
6
Storming 
¨ Storming includes feelings and behaviors of: 
¤ Resisting the tasks mutually agreed upon by the team. 
¤ Resisting quality improvement approaches suggested by other members. 
¤ Sharp fluctuations in attitude about the team and the project's chance of success. 
¤ Arguing among members even when they agree on the real issues. 
¤ Defensiveness, competition, and choosing sides. 
¤ Questioning the wisdom of those who selected this project and appointed the 
other members of the team. 
¤ Establishing unrealistic goals. Disunity, increased tension, and jealousy. 
¨ The above pressures mean that team members have little energy to spend 
on progressing towards the team's goal. 
¨ But they are beginning to understand one another. This phase sometimes 
takes 3 or 4 meetings before arriving at the Norming phase. 
¨ Exit Criteria? 
7
Norming 
¨ The team starting to work well together, and has turned around 
from the “storming” phase. 
¨ They may start to “brag up” the team concept to others who 
aren’t in the team and will be very positive about their role/ 
team group. 
¨ Often, the team will bounce back and forth between 
“storming” and “norming” when issues crop up. 
¨ Regressions will become fewer and fewer and the team will 
bounce back to “norming” in a quicker manner as the team 
“matures.” 
¨ The natural leaders at this stage may not be the ones who 
were visible in stages 1 & 2. Those people may no longer have 
the “unofficial lead roles” within the team. 
¨ This team still takes management direction, but not as much as 
storming. 
8
Norming 
¨ Norming includes feelings and behaviors of: 
¤ An ability to express criticism openly and constructively. 
¤ Acceptance of membership in the team. 
¤ An attempt to achieve harmony by avoiding conflict. 
¤ More friendliness, confiding in each other, and sharing of 
personal problems. 
¤ A sense of team cohesion, spirit, and goals. 
¤ Establishing and maintaining team ground rules and 
boundaries. 
¨ As team members begin to work out their differences, 
they now have more time and energy to spend on their 
assigned outcomes. 
¨ Exit Criteria? 
9
Performing 
¨ This is the level where the team becomes a high– 
performance team. 
¨ They can be given new projects and tasks and accomplish 
them successfully, and very seldom fall back into the 
“storming” phase. 
¨ At this level, the team is taking on new work on their own, 
and selling it to other teams. 
¨ At this level, the team can usually take on a new member 
or two with little trouble as far as regressing goes. 
¨ They are a complete self-managing team and require 
little, if any, external direction. 
¨ In many organizations, this can take 6 months or longer to 
reach this state this stage. 
¨ We have 1 week, so very mature individuals are our 
starting point. 
10
Performing 
¨ Performing includes feelings and behaviors of: 
¤ Members have insights into personal and group processes, 
and better understanding of each other's strengths and 
weakness, and how those contribute to the success of the 
team’s outcomes 
¤ Constructive self–change with mutual support. 
¤ Ability to prevent or work through group problems. 
¤ Close attachment to the team. 
¨ The team is now an effective, cohesive unit. You can tell 
when your team has reached this stage because you 
start getting a lot of work done. 
¨ Exit Criteria? 
11
Adjourning 
¨ The team briefs and shares the improved process 
during this phase. 
¨ When the team finally completes that last briefing, 
there is always a bittersweet sense of 
accomplishment coupled with the reluctance to say 
good–bye. 
¨ Many relationships formed within these teams 
continue long after the team disbands. 
¨ Exit Criteria? 
12
Teams versus Work Groups 
Roles and Responsibilities 
¨ Individuals establish a set 
of behaviors called roles. 
¨ These roles set the 
expectations governing the 
relationships between the 
group members. 
¨ The search for role 
definition serves as a 
source of confusion and 
conflict. 
¨ Roles become the reason 
for participating 
¨ Teams have a shared 
understanding of how to 
perform their role. 
¨ For example: 
¤ Time keeper 
¤ Score keeper 
¤ Leader 
¤ Facilitator 
¨ These roles are fluid and 
decided by the team 
13 
Work Group Teams
Teams versus Work Groups 
¨ Groups do not have a 
cohesive identity. 
¨ It is difficult to establish a 
sense of cohesion that 
characterizes a team. 
Identity 
¨ Teams have an identity. 
¨ A team has a clear 
understanding about what 
constitutes the team’s 
“work” and why it is 
important. 
¨ They can describe a picture 
of what the team needs to 
achieve, and the norms and 
values that will guide them. 
14 
Work Group Teams
Teams versus Work Groups 
Cohesion 
¨ Groups lack a source of 
cohesion. 
¨ Being a member of a 
group still leaves the person 
“alone” and an individual. 
¨ Teams have an esprit that 
shows a sense of bonding 
and camaraderie. 
¨ Esprit is the spirit, soul, and 
state of mind of the team. 
¨ It is the overall 
consciousness of the team 
that a person identifies with 
and feels a part of. 
¨ Individuals begin using 
“we” more than “me” or “I.” 
15 
Work Group Teams
Teams versus Work Groups 
Facilitating 
¨ Groups tend to get 
bogged down with 
trivial issues. 
¨ Hierarchy interferes 
with accomplishing the 
mission of the team 
¨ Teams use facilitators 
to keep the team on 
the right path. 
16 
Work Group Teams
Teams versus Work Groups 
Communication Communication 
¨ The communications with a 
group tend to be centered 
on individuals. 
¨ Individual positions are 
more important than a 
“team” opinion. 
¨ Defending ones opinion 
becomes an end unto itself. 
¨ The team is committed to 
open communication. 
¨ Team members feel they 
can state their opinions, 
thoughts, and feelings 
without fear. 
¨ Differences of opinion are 
valued and methods of 
managing conflict are 
understood. 
¨ Through honest and caring 
feedback, members are 
aware of their strengths 
and weaknesses as team 
members. 
17 
Work Group Teams
Teams versus Work Groups 
Flexibility Flexibility 
¨ Most groups are rigid, 
hierarchy – command and 
control. 
¨ This rigidity has several 
causes: 
¤ Defense of individual 
positions 
¤ Individual reward 
systems 
¨ The strength(s) of each 
individual is difficult to 
capitalize on since someone 
has to give up a role to 
allow another to assume 
that role. 
¨ Teams, provide flexibility 
and perform different task 
and maintenance functions 
as needed, when needed, 
and with mutual agreement. 
¨ The responsibility for team 
development and 
leadership is shared. 
¨ The strengths of each 
member are identified and 
used. 
¨ There is not role of Team 
Lead in the permanent 
sense of the term 
18 
Work Group Teams
Sources 
19 
¨ John Kotter, Harvard Business School is one source 
everyone should consult. 
¨ Jon Katzenbach, The Wisdom of Teams 
¨ Bruce Tuckman’s group dynamics model was first 
developed the 4 stages, then a 5th stage of the 
model used here

More Related Content

PPTX
Tuckman Team Development Model
PPTX
Tuckman's Model - FORMING, STORMING, NORMING & PERFORMING
PPT
PPT
Updated Team And Team Work
PPT
Stages Of Team Development
PPT
The ‘A’Team - Teamwork & Leadership
PPTX
Team Building
PPT
Teambuilding
Tuckman Team Development Model
Tuckman's Model - FORMING, STORMING, NORMING & PERFORMING
Updated Team And Team Work
Stages Of Team Development
The ‘A’Team - Teamwork & Leadership
Team Building
Teambuilding

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Team Leadership
PPT
Team Building PowerPoint PPT Content Modern Sample
PPTX
Team Building by Ravi Kumudesh
PPT
Team building
PPTX
PPT
servant leadership
PPTX
PPTX
Team Building
PPTX
Team effectiveness
PPTX
Team development
PPT
Team Building: Creating Effective Teams
PPTX
For An Effective Team Building Practice You Should Know..
PPT
Group Dynamics
PPTX
Team Work & Team Building
PPTX
The ways to create effective teamwork in organization
PPTX
Team & their Types
PPTX
Team build And Team Work
PPT
Team work slide
PPT
Team Building & Team Work
PPT
Teamwork presentation
Team Leadership
Team Building PowerPoint PPT Content Modern Sample
Team Building by Ravi Kumudesh
Team building
servant leadership
Team Building
Team effectiveness
Team development
Team Building: Creating Effective Teams
For An Effective Team Building Practice You Should Know..
Group Dynamics
Team Work & Team Building
The ways to create effective teamwork in organization
Team & their Types
Team build And Team Work
Team work slide
Team Building & Team Work
Teamwork presentation
Ad

Viewers also liked (13)

PPTX
Forming storming norming performing powerpoint presentation templates
PPTX
5 stages of group development, norms (tuckman)
PPTX
Tuckman Team Developmenton
PPT
Stages Of Group Development
PPT
Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing
PPTX
Group formation
PPT
GROUP FORMATION
PDF
Modell Teamentwicklung und Produktivität
PPTX
THE FIVE DYSFUNCTIONS Of A TEAM - Eine Zusammenfassung
PPTX
Vom Mediator im Unternehmen zum Konfliktmanagementsystem
PPTX
Stages of group formation
PDF
Patrick Lencioni’s Five Team Dysfunctions
PDF
The 5 Dysfunctions of a Team
Forming storming norming performing powerpoint presentation templates
5 stages of group development, norms (tuckman)
Tuckman Team Developmenton
Stages Of Group Development
Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing
Group formation
GROUP FORMATION
Modell Teamentwicklung und Produktivität
THE FIVE DYSFUNCTIONS Of A TEAM - Eine Zusammenfassung
Vom Mediator im Unternehmen zum Konfliktmanagementsystem
Stages of group formation
Patrick Lencioni’s Five Team Dysfunctions
The 5 Dysfunctions of a Team
Ad

Similar to Forming, storming, norming, performing (v3) (20)

PDF
formingstormingnormingperformingv3-100731151547-phpapp02.pdf
PPTX
Body Shop Performance Team
PPTX
Team developmentstages
PPTX
The Team
PPT
8 Working With Teams
PPTX
Organizational Behavior - IIIrd Unit.pptx
PPTX
creatingeffectiveteamsppt-130309094358-phpapp01.pptx
PPTX
REPORT STAGES OF GROUP DEVELOPMENT & DYNAMICS OF AN EFFECTIVE TEAM
PDF
Teamwork ppt presentation
PDF
Teamwork presentation
PPTX
Stages of Team Development
PPTX
stagesofteamdevelopment-170613165020 (2).pptx
PPTX
Group & team
PPTX
Team management
PPTX
Teamwork
PPT
1-Teamwork soft skills presentataion-Module.ppt
PPT
1-Teamwork-Module soft skill presentation.ppt
PPT
1-Teamwork-Module soft skill presentation.ppt
PPT
Together Everyone Achieves More (Team) Work
formingstormingnormingperformingv3-100731151547-phpapp02.pdf
Body Shop Performance Team
Team developmentstages
The Team
8 Working With Teams
Organizational Behavior - IIIrd Unit.pptx
creatingeffectiveteamsppt-130309094358-phpapp01.pptx
REPORT STAGES OF GROUP DEVELOPMENT & DYNAMICS OF AN EFFECTIVE TEAM
Teamwork ppt presentation
Teamwork presentation
Stages of Team Development
stagesofteamdevelopment-170613165020 (2).pptx
Group & team
Team management
Teamwork
1-Teamwork soft skills presentataion-Module.ppt
1-Teamwork-Module soft skill presentation.ppt
1-Teamwork-Module soft skill presentation.ppt
Together Everyone Achieves More (Team) Work

More from Glen Alleman (20)

PDF
Managing risk with deliverables planning
PDF
A Gentle Introduction to the IMP/IMS
PDF
Increasing the Probability of Project Success
PDF
Process Flow and Narrative for Agile+PPM
PDF
Practices of risk management
PDF
Principles of Risk Management
PDF
Deliverables Based Planning, PMBOK® and 5 Immutable Principles of Project Suc...
PDF
From Principles to Strategies for Systems Engineering
PDF
NAVAIR Integrated Master Schedule Guide guide
PDF
Building a Credible Performance Measurement Baseline
PDF
Integrated master plan methodology (v2)
PDF
IMP / IMS Step by Step
PDF
DHS - Using functions points to estimate agile development programs (v2)
PDF
Making the impossible possible
PDF
Heliotropic Abundance
PDF
Capabilities based planning
PDF
Process Flow and Narrative for Agile
PDF
Building the Performance Measurement Baseline
PPTX
Program Management Office Lean Software Development and Six Sigma
PDF
Policy and Procedure Rollout
Managing risk with deliverables planning
A Gentle Introduction to the IMP/IMS
Increasing the Probability of Project Success
Process Flow and Narrative for Agile+PPM
Practices of risk management
Principles of Risk Management
Deliverables Based Planning, PMBOK® and 5 Immutable Principles of Project Suc...
From Principles to Strategies for Systems Engineering
NAVAIR Integrated Master Schedule Guide guide
Building a Credible Performance Measurement Baseline
Integrated master plan methodology (v2)
IMP / IMS Step by Step
DHS - Using functions points to estimate agile development programs (v2)
Making the impossible possible
Heliotropic Abundance
Capabilities based planning
Process Flow and Narrative for Agile
Building the Performance Measurement Baseline
Program Management Office Lean Software Development and Six Sigma
Policy and Procedure Rollout

Forming, storming, norming, performing (v3)

  • 1. FORMING, STORMING, NORMING, PERFORMING, AND ADJOURNING 1 Managers are people who do things right, while leaders are people who do the right thing. – Warren Bennis, Ph.D. "On Becoming a Leader" Glen B. Alleman, 2003
  • 2. Introduction ¨ Forming – team members are introduced to each other, each positioning from specialist Point of View ¨ Storming – the team transitions from “as is” to “to be” y articulating shared outcome ¨ Norming – the team reaches consensus on the “to be” process and the a shared outcome ¨ Performing – the team has settled its relationships and expectations of each other with mutual accountability ¨ Adjourning – the team shares the improved processes with others 2
  • 3. Staged Development of Teams ¨ The Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing stages are seemingly obvious, but are in fact difficult. ¤ Participants want to move to the Performing stage without passing through the first three stages. ¤ The Forming stage is relatively easy. ¤ The Storming stage is difficult and many times the cause of the team’s failure. ¤ Performing seems easy once the storming process is complete. ¨ The “Real” problem is how to identify when a stage is complete: ¤ The team members agree that the stage is complete? ¤ The team coach agrees the stage is complete? ¤ The team simply moves on to the next stage? ¨ The definition of the “exit criteria” between stages needs to be worked out prior to the team’s reaching the end of the stage. ¤ This again, seems obvious but is also very difficult. 3
  • 4. Forming 4 ¨ The “polite” stage in which the team starts to form. ¨ Everyone is trying to figure out what the team concept is, what their role is, how they are going to hang on to their power base. ¨ Initial “silent” leaders may take the reins. ¨ The team is usually positive – for the most part – for the initial meetings. ¨ No one has offended anyone at this point yet!
  • 5. Forming ¨ Forming includes feelings and behaviors of: ¤ Excitement, anticipation, and optimism. ¤ Pride in being chosen for the project. ¤ A tentative attachment to the team Suspicion and anxiety about the job. ¤ Defining the tasks and how they will be accomplished. ¤ Determining acceptable group behavior. ¤ Deciding what information needs to be gathered. ¤ Abstract discussions of the concepts and issues, and for some members, impatience with these discussions. There will be difficulty in identifying some of the relevant problems. ¨ Because there is so much going on to distract members' attention in the beginning, the team accomplishes little, if anything, that concerns it's project goals. This is perfectly normal. ¨ Exit Criteria? 5
  • 6. Storming ¨ The honeymoon is over. ¨ The silent leaders may be clashing for control of the group. ¤ They must become Team Members and give up their previous Command and Control Leadership paradigm ¨ People disagree and may blame the team concept, saying it doesn’t work. ¨ Management needs to do a lot of coaching to get people to work past their differences, may take separate 1-on-1’s with people. ¨ Selecting high maturity members is a critical success factor for Teaming. 6
  • 7. Storming ¨ Storming includes feelings and behaviors of: ¤ Resisting the tasks mutually agreed upon by the team. ¤ Resisting quality improvement approaches suggested by other members. ¤ Sharp fluctuations in attitude about the team and the project's chance of success. ¤ Arguing among members even when they agree on the real issues. ¤ Defensiveness, competition, and choosing sides. ¤ Questioning the wisdom of those who selected this project and appointed the other members of the team. ¤ Establishing unrealistic goals. Disunity, increased tension, and jealousy. ¨ The above pressures mean that team members have little energy to spend on progressing towards the team's goal. ¨ But they are beginning to understand one another. This phase sometimes takes 3 or 4 meetings before arriving at the Norming phase. ¨ Exit Criteria? 7
  • 8. Norming ¨ The team starting to work well together, and has turned around from the “storming” phase. ¨ They may start to “brag up” the team concept to others who aren’t in the team and will be very positive about their role/ team group. ¨ Often, the team will bounce back and forth between “storming” and “norming” when issues crop up. ¨ Regressions will become fewer and fewer and the team will bounce back to “norming” in a quicker manner as the team “matures.” ¨ The natural leaders at this stage may not be the ones who were visible in stages 1 & 2. Those people may no longer have the “unofficial lead roles” within the team. ¨ This team still takes management direction, but not as much as storming. 8
  • 9. Norming ¨ Norming includes feelings and behaviors of: ¤ An ability to express criticism openly and constructively. ¤ Acceptance of membership in the team. ¤ An attempt to achieve harmony by avoiding conflict. ¤ More friendliness, confiding in each other, and sharing of personal problems. ¤ A sense of team cohesion, spirit, and goals. ¤ Establishing and maintaining team ground rules and boundaries. ¨ As team members begin to work out their differences, they now have more time and energy to spend on their assigned outcomes. ¨ Exit Criteria? 9
  • 10. Performing ¨ This is the level where the team becomes a high– performance team. ¨ They can be given new projects and tasks and accomplish them successfully, and very seldom fall back into the “storming” phase. ¨ At this level, the team is taking on new work on their own, and selling it to other teams. ¨ At this level, the team can usually take on a new member or two with little trouble as far as regressing goes. ¨ They are a complete self-managing team and require little, if any, external direction. ¨ In many organizations, this can take 6 months or longer to reach this state this stage. ¨ We have 1 week, so very mature individuals are our starting point. 10
  • 11. Performing ¨ Performing includes feelings and behaviors of: ¤ Members have insights into personal and group processes, and better understanding of each other's strengths and weakness, and how those contribute to the success of the team’s outcomes ¤ Constructive self–change with mutual support. ¤ Ability to prevent or work through group problems. ¤ Close attachment to the team. ¨ The team is now an effective, cohesive unit. You can tell when your team has reached this stage because you start getting a lot of work done. ¨ Exit Criteria? 11
  • 12. Adjourning ¨ The team briefs and shares the improved process during this phase. ¨ When the team finally completes that last briefing, there is always a bittersweet sense of accomplishment coupled with the reluctance to say good–bye. ¨ Many relationships formed within these teams continue long after the team disbands. ¨ Exit Criteria? 12
  • 13. Teams versus Work Groups Roles and Responsibilities ¨ Individuals establish a set of behaviors called roles. ¨ These roles set the expectations governing the relationships between the group members. ¨ The search for role definition serves as a source of confusion and conflict. ¨ Roles become the reason for participating ¨ Teams have a shared understanding of how to perform their role. ¨ For example: ¤ Time keeper ¤ Score keeper ¤ Leader ¤ Facilitator ¨ These roles are fluid and decided by the team 13 Work Group Teams
  • 14. Teams versus Work Groups ¨ Groups do not have a cohesive identity. ¨ It is difficult to establish a sense of cohesion that characterizes a team. Identity ¨ Teams have an identity. ¨ A team has a clear understanding about what constitutes the team’s “work” and why it is important. ¨ They can describe a picture of what the team needs to achieve, and the norms and values that will guide them. 14 Work Group Teams
  • 15. Teams versus Work Groups Cohesion ¨ Groups lack a source of cohesion. ¨ Being a member of a group still leaves the person “alone” and an individual. ¨ Teams have an esprit that shows a sense of bonding and camaraderie. ¨ Esprit is the spirit, soul, and state of mind of the team. ¨ It is the overall consciousness of the team that a person identifies with and feels a part of. ¨ Individuals begin using “we” more than “me” or “I.” 15 Work Group Teams
  • 16. Teams versus Work Groups Facilitating ¨ Groups tend to get bogged down with trivial issues. ¨ Hierarchy interferes with accomplishing the mission of the team ¨ Teams use facilitators to keep the team on the right path. 16 Work Group Teams
  • 17. Teams versus Work Groups Communication Communication ¨ The communications with a group tend to be centered on individuals. ¨ Individual positions are more important than a “team” opinion. ¨ Defending ones opinion becomes an end unto itself. ¨ The team is committed to open communication. ¨ Team members feel they can state their opinions, thoughts, and feelings without fear. ¨ Differences of opinion are valued and methods of managing conflict are understood. ¨ Through honest and caring feedback, members are aware of their strengths and weaknesses as team members. 17 Work Group Teams
  • 18. Teams versus Work Groups Flexibility Flexibility ¨ Most groups are rigid, hierarchy – command and control. ¨ This rigidity has several causes: ¤ Defense of individual positions ¤ Individual reward systems ¨ The strength(s) of each individual is difficult to capitalize on since someone has to give up a role to allow another to assume that role. ¨ Teams, provide flexibility and perform different task and maintenance functions as needed, when needed, and with mutual agreement. ¨ The responsibility for team development and leadership is shared. ¨ The strengths of each member are identified and used. ¨ There is not role of Team Lead in the permanent sense of the term 18 Work Group Teams
  • 19. Sources 19 ¨ John Kotter, Harvard Business School is one source everyone should consult. ¨ Jon Katzenbach, The Wisdom of Teams ¨ Bruce Tuckman’s group dynamics model was first developed the 4 stages, then a 5th stage of the model used here