This document discusses standards-based grading for student editors. It outlines the pros and cons of letting editors grade their peers, including increased accountability and real-world experience as pros, and popularity contests and accuracy as cons. It then details how one high school implements grading for editors, with editors grading each other using rubrics in their individual roles of writing, design, and photography. Mini-deadlines are also set to keep editors on track. The document provides examples of rubrics and checklists used by different editor roles, and discusses the process an editor-in-chief and assistant go through to finalize pages each deadline.
Related topics: