Gramsci and hegemony
Download as DOC, PDF4 likes8,832 views
Antonio Gramsci was an Italian Marxist thinker in the early 20th century. He developed the concept of hegemony to describe how the dominant social class maintains control through political, economic, and ideological means. This involves projecting their worldview as common sense to gain willing consent from subordinate classes. However, Gramsci noted that common sense is not static and subordinate classes will challenge hegemony based on their social experiences, making ideology a site of constant struggle between classes. He rejected the idea that the economy alone determines society and emphasized the independence of ideology and importance of struggle over ideas.
1 of 1
Downloaded 111 times
More Related Content
What's hot (20)
Ad
Viewers also liked (20)
Ad
Similar to Gramsci and hegemony (20)
More from jphibbert1979 (20)
Recently uploaded (20)
Gramsci and hegemony
- 1. Gramsci and hegemony Antonio Gramsci, an Italian (1891-1937), was a leading Marxist thinker. Like Althusser, he rejected economism, insisting on the independence of ideology from economic determinism. Gramsci also rejected crude materialism, offering a humanist version of Marxism which focused on human subjectivity. Gramsci used the term hegemony to denote the predominance of one social class over others (e.g. bourgeois hegemony). This represents not only political and economic control, but also the ability of the dominant class to project its own way of seeing the world so that those who are subordinated by it accept it as 'common sense' and 'natural'. Commentators stress that this involves willing and active consent. Common sense, suggests Geoffrey Nowell-Smith, is 'the way a subordinate class lives its subordination' (cited in Alvarado & Boyd-Barrett 1992: 51). However, unlike Althusser, Gramsci emphasizes struggle. He noted that 'common sense is not something rigid and immobile, but is continually transforming itself' (Gramsci, cited in Hall 1982: 73). As Fiske puts it, 'Consent must be constantly won and rewon, for people's material social experience constantly reminds them of the disadvantages of subordination and thus poses a threat to the dominant class... Hegemony... posits a constant contradiction between ideology and the social experience of the subordinate that makes this interface into an inevitable site of ideological struggle' (Fiske 1992: 291). References to the mass media in terms of an ideological 'site of struggle' are recurrent in the commentaries of those influenced by this perspective. Gramsci's stance involved a rejection of economism since it saw a struggle for ideological hegemony as a primary factor in radical change.