Gamification: strategies for interaction and pedagogic assessment - at Great Lisbon International Conference 2013
3 likes763 views
The document outlines a series of group projects focused on using the MVC architectural style to develop applications across various platforms, including OpenSimulator/Second Life and Windows Phone with XNA and Silverlight frameworks. Over three iterations from 2010 to 2013, it describes the evolution of student engagement, structured activities, and the quality of outcomes, ultimately leading to a business-like environment with active learning and formative assessment principles. The improvements in group dynamics and feedback mechanisms contributed to a greater number of successful project completions in the final iteration.
Gamification: strategies for interaction and pedagogic assessment - at Great Lisbon International Conference 2013
- 1. Choose your character Leonel Morgado Daniela Pedrosa Ricardo Nunes Gamification: strategies for interaction and pedagogic assessment
- 3. Welcome to Programming Methodologies III (MPIII) frameworks libraries application programming interfaces (API) software architecture Novice Competent(…) (…) Expert Prologue 3/16
- 4. Group 1 Write a detailed document explaining how to use the MVC architectural style to develop applications using OpenSimulator/Second Life virtual worlds as a user interface, employing the libOpenMetaverse library. The document should include specific implementation examples to illustrate the explanation. Group II Write a detailed document explaining how to use the MVC architectural style to develop applications using the Windows Phone Application Platform, employing the XNA framework. The document should include specific implementation examples to illustrate the explanation. Group III Same as group 2, but employing the Silverlight framework. Sample assignment instantiations Prologue 4/16
- 5. Literature Research Step 1 Contact and interaction with communities online practices of programmers Step 2 •Contact and interaction with communities •Final Report Step 3 Final Presentation Step 4 First Iteration 2010/2011 Mission I students 5/16
- 6. In this first iteration, Most students did not manage to reach successful outcomes
- 7. • Literature Research • Presentation in communities online practices of programmers • Group work – review of the reading tokens Step 1 • Contact and interaction with communities online practices of programmers • Assemble the group Step 2 • Report the activities • Assemble the group • Final Report • Final Presentation Step 3 7/16 Second Iteration 2011/2012 Mission II students more structured activities monitoring of tutors few moments of feedback group-dynamic games assistents
- 8. In this second iteration, Although more groups managed to reach the end of the activity, overall quality remained low
- 9. Third Iteration 2012/2013 Mission III business-like (roleplaying) deadlines coaching constant feedback students assistents environment • Research about the technologies • Interaction in communities • Group work – initiation of problem solving Step 1 • Integration of technologies • Group work – practical examples Step 2 • Improving the project • Final presentation with practical problem solving Step 3 Final improvement of the project Step 4
- 11. Director (teacher/professor) Team 1 Team N (...) Team leader 1 (student) Team leader N (student) Manager (assistant) Manager (assistant) Principles Business-like 11/16
- 16. In this final iteration, 11 teams Did manage to reach successful outcomes