Gsma mobile backhaul an overview - future networks

1/30/2021 GSMA | Mobile Backhaul: An Overview - Future Networks
https://www.gsma.com/futurenetworks/wiki/mobile-backhaul-an-overview/ 1/21
Future Networks
 Login
Search for online documents 
Mobile Backhaul: An Overview
Future Networks
Homepage
Network Economics
Network Economics
Case Studies
AI & Automation: An
Overview
Mobile Backhaul: An
Overview
Infrastructure
Sharing: An
Overview
Energy Efficiency:
An Overview

ABOUT WHAT WE DO MEMBERSHIP SERVICES EVENTS NEWS

Last updated: June 19, 2019
View Case Studies
1. Introduction
What is Mobile Backhaul?
Mobile backhaul refers to the transport network that connects the core
network and the RAN (Radio Access Network) of the mobile network.
Recently, the introduction of small cells has given rise to the concept of
fronthaul, which is a transport network that connects the macrocell to the
small cells. Whilst mobile backhaul and fronthaul are different concept, the
term mobile backhaul is generally used to encompass both concepts.
Furthermore, innovations to reduce demand on mobile backhaul
sometimes involve architectural changes in the antenna (also referred to as
radio unit in 4G) and the controller (also referred to as digital unit in 4G).
Therefore, the components labelled in red in the figure below will be
covered for backhaul demand case studies within the GSMA Future
Networks Network Economics.


Figure 1. Mobile network and the scope of mobile backhaul

Success of LTE and Growing Importance of
Mobile Backhaul
Wireless and fixed-line backhaul infrastructure is an essential component of
the mobile telecommunications network. Mobile networks are ubiquitous
and support a mix of voice, video, text and data traffic originating from and
terminating to mobile devices. All of this traffic must be conveyed between
the mobile cellular base stations and the core network. The success of 4G
Long-Term Evolution (LTE) has placed even greater challenges on mobile
operators as they strive for more network capacity, latency reduction, and
the need to deliver an enhanced user experience. Notwithstanding the

success of LTE (as of May 2019, there were 729 LTE operators in more than
221 countries), there are also a number of new challenges on the horizon
that will impact on the MNO’s backhaul network infrastructure.
In the era of 5G, where a network will be densified and more stringent
requirement will be imposed, mobile backhaul will become even more
important. Given the limitations governed by laws of physics, the mobile
backhaul will add much more pressure on mobile operators’ cost. Whilst
mobile operators will be able to unlock new business opportunities with
5G, the costs need to be optimised for the operators to sustainably reap
the benefits of 5G. These are described in more detail in the next section.
2. Challenges in Mobile
Backhaul
There are a number of market trends that result in new challenges and
requirements that must be met by the backhaul infrastructure of MNO
networks.
Evolution of LTE

There are a number of technical innovations occurring on LTE, which is
known as LTE-Advanced Pro or 4.5G which enable enhancements such as
improved peak bandwidth and greater energy efficiency for IoT
connections. The peak bandwidth of 4.5G is around 1Gbps which is 8-10x
higher than standard LTE, and will enable (inter alia) support of video
traffic at 4K resolution to mobile devices.
Emergence of 5G
By the end of 2018, there have already been some 5G deployments for
FWA (Fixed Wireless Access) but the first mainstream 5G mobile services
are expected to commence in 2020. In early 2018, there were 113 operators
in 56 countries doing 5G trials and it is anticipated that by 2024, 50
countries will have in-service 5G networks. The 5G network will comprise
both NR (New Radio) as well as a new 5G Core Network (5GC). The advent
of NR offers a leap in bandwidth speeds in comparison to 4G via the
utilisation of higher frequency spectrum. There will be 3 separate 5G bands
initially, namely Sub-1 GHz, 1-6 GHz and above 6GHz. It is expected
spectrum bands above 24GHz will be agreed upon at the WRC in 2019,
which includes 26GHz and 40GHz bands. The higher frequencies enable
wider channel bandwidths at the access but also result in smaller cell sizes.
Both have implications for backhaul.

5G Network Slicing
5G Network Slicing. One of the key features of the 5G Network is the
concept of “network slicing” whereby the physical network infrastructure
can be partitioned into bespoke logical networks (“slices”) in the RAN and
5G core which are targeted to the needs of a specific application or use
case. Slicing will also impact on the backhaul network and will also
facilitate sharing of infrastructure to optimise cost (for more information
on infrastructure sharing, see
here
).
Subscriber Growth
At the end of 2017, subscriber numbers stood at over 8.1 billion with an
annual growth rate of 5.4% year on year. It is estimated that by 2025, the
number of subscriptions will be 9.8 billion. In terms of different RAN
technologies, LTE subscriptions were at 2.86 billion in 2017 (35.2% of the
overall total) and will be at 4.24 billion (43.3% of the overall total) by 2025
whilst 5G subscriptions will be around 850 million by 2025. Furthermore,
IoT devices (LTE-M and NB-IOT) will grow from 376 million to 4.2 billion in
the 2017-25 timeframe. Therefore, backhaul strategy/evolution must cope

with both an increase in subscriptions as well as a large number of those
subscriptions being “high bandwidth” users.
Mobile data traffic growth
The increasing subscriber total plus increased access bandwidth usage of
those subscribers results in mobile data traffic increasing at a rate of 28.9%
CAGR to reach over 1300 Exabytes [1300 x 1018
bytes] by 2025. By 2025,
4G and 5G subscribers will represent 55% of subscriptions but will generate
91% of the traffic. There will also be a marked shift in the type of traffic
being carried with video streaming increasing from 81 Exabytes (which is
just under 50% of total traffic) to 910 Exabytes (which is 70% of total
mobile traffic). Per-user traffic per month is expected to grow from 1.7
GBytes to 11.3 GBytes between 2017 and 2025. In some markets (e.g.
Korea and Japan), it is noted that some smartphone users were already
generating 12GBytes per month in 2017.
Stringent latency requirements
Both 5G mission-critical applications and increased video streaming will
result in more stringent end-end latency requirements and impact on the
backhaul latency budget. For example, an end-end latency cap of 10ms
implies a latency across the backhaul that is <1ms – which means that only

fibre optic and microwave links will be able to support such low latency
requirements. If higher latency backhaul links are deployed (e.g. satellite
links), then such backhaul would only carry 2G/3G and non-latency
sensitive LTE services.
Network densification
The increased demand for mobile broadband results in the number of
macrocell sites being estimated to grow globally from 11.1 million to 14.1
million. The new macrocells include both 4G and 5G technologies. This
results in extra traffic to backhaul as well as additional challenges due to
the smaller cell size for 5G NR.
Furthermore, the growth of LTE traffic resulted in MNOs being increasingly
reliant on small cell site deployments. Small cells will be even more
essential for 5G. Small cells can be deployed outdoors or indoors and
include low power microcells, femtocells and picocells. They can be
deployed on private or public infrastructure in the urban environment (e.g.
rooftops, street poles etc.). In the period 2017-25, the number of small cells
is expected to increase globally from 0.71 million to 4.3 million. From a
backhaul point of view, there is a need to be able to carry traffic from
many more cell sites in a scalable, efficient and economic manner.

3. Technology Choices for
Mobile Backhaul
There are a number of technical solutions used by Mobile operators for
backhaul, including both wireline and wireless solutions.
Copper-line
Copper-based backhaul was the primary backhaul technology for 2G/3G.
At the heart of copper-based backhaul is the T1/E1 protocol, which
supported 1.5 Mbps to 2 Mbps. This bandwidth can be boosted by using
DSL over the copper pair as well as so-called copper-bonding (i.e. multiple
copper pairs are bonded together). For example, having up to 12 bonded
pairs can provide over 150 Mbps downlink capacity over 1.5 km.
Nevertheless, copper lines do not scale easily to provide adequate
bandwidth at a distance above a few hundred meters to support LTE
broadband usage and 5G traffic scenarios will prove particularly
challenging for mobile service providers. In bonded configurations, as
monthly costs increase linearly with bandwidth requirements. Therefore, as
bandwidth requirements become more onerous, copper-based backhaul
has become an infrequently used solution and operators are increasingly

preferring fibre-optic where available (e.g.. in city centres). For all that,
DSL is still an option for mobile backhaul for indoor small cells, in-building
HetNets, and public venue small cell networks.
Fibre-Optic
This technology is the mainstay wired backhaul in MNO networks and
second overall only to microwave backhaul. Even though fibre has
significant inherent bandwidth carrying capability, several additional
techniques can be used to offset any bandwidth constraints and essentially
rendering the fibre assets future-proof. These techniques include
Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) technology which enables
multiple optical signals to be conveyed in parallel by carrying each signal
on a different wavelength or colour of light. WDM can be divided into
Coarse WDM (CDWM) or Dense WDM (DWDM). CWDM provides 8
channels using 8 wavelengths, while DWDM uses close channel spacing to
deliver even more throughput per fibre. Modern systems can handle up to
160 signals, each with a bandwidth of 10 Gbps for a total theoretical
capacity of 1.6 Tbps per fibre. The traffic generated by LTE has accelerated
the demand for Fiber to the Tower (FTTT) and has required Mobile
Network Operators (MNOs) to upgrade many aspects of their backhaul
networks to fibre-based Carrier Ethernet. The main limitations of fibre are
the cost and logistics of deploying fibre (ducts etc.), although the cost of
fibre has been decreasing over the last few years (e.g. it now costs circa

$70K/km whereas 5 years ago it cost circa $100K/km). Nonetheless, it can
still take several months to provision a cell site with fibre optic backhaul.
Fibre backhaul was used for 26% of global macrocell backhaul links in 2017,
growing to just under 40% by 2025. Fibre will also be the main choice
Wireless backhaul (microwave)
Despite fibre being the preferred choice for MNOs for 4G/5G backhaul,
microwave backhaul is the most used technology due to a combination of
its capability and relative ease of deployment (i.e. no need for
trenches/ducting) making it a low-cost option that can be deployed in a
matter of days. Most MNOs rely heavily rely on microwave backhaul
solutions in the 7 GHz to 40 GHz bands, in addition to higher microwave
bands such as V-band (60 GHz) and the E-band (70/80 GHz). Backhaul
links using the V-band or the E-band are well suited to supporting 5G due
to their 10 Gbps to 25 Gbps data throughput capabilities. Microwave can
be used in LOS or NLOS mode which makes it ideal to be used in a chain,
mesh or ring topologies to enable resilience and/or reach. The main
drawback is that microwave backhaul requires a licence, apart from the V-
band that is unlicensed and to a lesser extent the E-band which is lightly
licenced. It is also possible to combine a low-frequency microwave band
with a high-frequency microwave band to achieve high capacity over long
distances with enhanced availability.

LOS vs. NLOS
Historically, most wireless backhaul links have been LOS (Line of Sight) due
to the high frequencies being used, as well as the narrow beam widths
used. However, over the past 10 years, NLOS (Non-Line of Sight) has
become a viable solution that should prove particularly advantageous with
a large number of clusters of small cells that MNOs are expected to deploy
over the next few years.
LOS backhaul has the advantage of using a highly directed beam with little
fading or multi-path dispersion and enables efficient use of spectrum as
multiple transceivers can be located within a few feet of each other and
use the same frequency to transmit different data streams. On the other
hand, it may be difficult to always have an unobstructed path in certain
scenarios (e.g. trees, buildings in the way) and the transceiver pair need
precise alignment. In the latter case, this can be impacted by “pole tilt”
where the alignment is spoiled by movement caused by the wind and a
particular concern for small cells. The pole tilt issue gets worse as
frequencies increase due to the beam narrowing. For large numbers of
small cells (e.g. in a metropolitan hot spot), the cost of backhaul can
increase quickly if a number of links are daisy chained together.
NLOS backhaul is much more “plug and play” and so take less time with
less skilled labour to set up. NLOS backhaul OFDM technology

(Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing) to relay information back to
a central base station. NLOS backhaul needs only to be within a range of
the receiver unit with OFDM providing a level of tolerance to multi-path
fading not possible with LOS. There is a limit to how many small cells can
be blanketed by a single NLOS backhaul to ensure each cell has a given
QoS as all of the bandwidth is shared between the multiple base stations
covered by the central unit. This bandwidth sharing is a disadvantage in
that there is an upper limit on the bandwidth available to each base station
and calculations need to be re-done if further base stations are added.
Frequency planning also needed to avoid interference as the NLOS
frequency ranges can also be used for access.
Satellite backhaul
Satellite Backhaul is a niche solution for MNOs and used in fringe areas
(e.g. remote rural areas) and sometimes as an emergency/temporary
measure (e.g. a disaster area or in place of a microwave link whilst waiting
for licence approval). This backhaul is used in developing markets and as a
complementary role in developed markets. The technology can deliver
150Mbps/10Mbps (downlink/.uplink). However, latency is a challenge as
there a round trip delay of circa 500-600ms for a geostationary satellite.
LEO (Low Earth Orbit) satellites have tried to address the latency issue (i.e.
using a much lower orbit of 1500km versus 36000km and resulting in a
one way trip of circa 50ms). However, LEO satellites are not geostationary

and thus there is sometimes a need to route traffic via multiple satellites.
LEO satellites are also relatively immature technology. Fees are also usage
based on satellite links and means that such links need to be monitored
and controlled.
WiFi backhaul
There is marginal (<1%) use of this technology for macrocell backhaul in
some emerging markets. The unlicensed nature of the technology
combined with the growing interference from increasing public and private
WLANs plus poor transmission ranges severely limits its deployment.
Market share and trends
In terms of market share and trends, wireless backhaul (microwave) in the
traditional (7-40GHz) range was responsible for nearly 57% of macrocell
backhaul links in 2017, diminishing to 45% of macro-cell links by 2025.
Microwave links in the 41-100GHz will double from 3.2% to 6.1% in the same
period. The shorter range of the latter (<3km) is offset by their increased
data throughput and thus make it a suitable technology in urban areas. For
small cells, traditional microwave was used for 35.2% of links in 2017
diminishing to 21% in 2025, whilst microwave links in the 41-100 GHz range
will grow from 10.4% to 13.1% in the same period.

Fibre based backhaul was responsible for 25.6% of macrocell links in 2017,
rising to 39.6% by 2025. Fibre is the market leader for small cell backhaul
with 43.2% of the market on 2017, rising to 56.1% in 2025. DSL based
backhaul was used for 3.6% of macrocell backhaul in 2017 and this share is
expected to decline over the next few years. Satellite comprised 1.9% of
backhaul links in 2017 and this will diminish to 1.4% in 2025 (although the
overall number will increase), reflecting its niche/complimentary role.
These trends are summarized in the figure below.

Figure 2. Backhaul technology trend and forecast (Source: ABI Research)

Cost comparison of selected technologies
for mobile backhaul
While fibre promises the best performance among the technologies
considered, economics can be challenging for the mobile operator to
deploy. As shown in the figure below, the economics of fibre depends on
how much civil engineering work is required (i.e. duct reuse or 100%
trenching) along with the effect of regulation. For most sub-urban
scenarios (other than 90% duct reuse), achieving 1Gbps with microwave is
more economic while fibre is more economic for urban scenarios except
for the case of own build with 100% trenching. The comparison also
indicates that sharing of backhaul infrastructure (i.e. leasing or duct reuse)
can lead to better economics (for more information on infrastructure
sharing, see
here
). It can be deduced that wireless solutions can be used to reduce the cost
of mobile backhaul as it reduces necessary civil engineering work.


Figure 3. Backhaul economics per site: Fibre vs. IP microwave
(Source: OFCOM, BT Openreach, Bernstein)
Deployment scenarios are complex and diverse and mobile operators will
need a mixture of wired and wireless solutions to provide the optimum
solution for a given deployment scenario.

4. Alternative Architectures
for Mobile Backhaul
Optimisation
MEC (Multi-access edge computing)
MEC (Multi-access edge computing) is where computing and intelligence
capabilities that were mostly centralized in the core network are provided
at the edge of the access network. MEC enables high bandwidth and ultra-
low latency access to cloud computing/IT services at the edge to be
accessed by applications developers and content providers.
MEC, while incurring a cost to implement core functions at the edge, can
provide opportunities to optimise backhaul demand via caching and/or
local breakout. Caching reduces the load on mobile backhaul and enhances
the customer experience by storing frequently accessed contents in the
edge network. Customers can access the contents at a lower latency (with
less distance for signal to travel) and backhaul demand is reduced as there
is no need to reach further to the external network to obtain the contents.
Local breakout also enables the mobile backhaul to be optimised as the

contents do not need to travel to the core network and then to the
internet. The caveat with local breakout is that the transport network to
connect the edge to the internet needs to be in place and therefore won’t
optimise cost in certain scenarios.
Cloud RAN
Cloud RAN is where some layers of radio access network are centralized to
an edge site rather than at the cell site, which allows some (or all) of the
processing capabilities to be focused at the edge site reducing the
complexities at the cell site. This architecture is suitable in the small cell
era, where only a little space and cost constraint is affordable at the cell
site. While the architecture may not be suitable for traditional macrocell
base stations as they would need to process significant load of signal
transmitted from/received by various radio elements, heterogeneous
networks with many small cells would benefit from this architecture.
As shown in the figure below, Cloud RAN in its two forms (low-level and
high-level splits) significantly reduces complexities and capabilities at the
cell site to be concentrated in the edge site. The low-level split is where
only the physical layer is processed at the edge site while all the
electronics are concentrated in the edge site. This architecture allows easy
installation and very low complexity at the cell site but comes at a higher
fronthaul cost as baseband signals would need to be transferred. On the

other hand, high-level split brings relatively less fronthaul cost but comes
with more complexity at the cell site than low-level split.

Figure 4. Cloud RAN Architecture
Please sign in above to make comments or edits to this document. To sign
up for our newsletter, please click
here
.

Industry Programmes
Future Networks
Identity
Internet of Things
GSMA Documents
Advocacy Initiatives
External Affairs & Industry Purpose
Mobile for Development
Public Policy
Spectrum
The Mobile Economy
GSMA Training
Services
GSMA Intelligence
IMEI Services
PathFinder
TAC Allocation
Network Settings Exchange
Convening the Industry
MWC Barcelona
MWC Shanghai
MWC Los Angeles
GSMA Thrive
Mobile 360 Series
4YFN
Join us! Click here for current vacancies within the GSMA
Legal
© Copyright 2021 GSM Association.
The GSM logo is registered and owned by the GSM Association.
What We Do

Gsma mobile backhaul an overview - future networks

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Gsma mobile backhaul an overview - future networks (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Gsma mobile backhaul an overview - future networks