SlideShare a Scribd company logo
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 1
Ch 4. Heuristic Search
 4.0 Introduction(Heuristic)
 4.1 An Algorithm for Heuristic Search
 4.1.1 Implementing Best-First Search
 4.1.2 Implementing Heuristic Evaluation Functions
 4.1.3 Heuristic Search and Expert Systems
 4.3 Using Heuristics in Games
 4.3.1 Minimax Procedure
 4.3.2 Minimaxing to Fixed Ply Depth
 4.3.3 Alpha-Beta Procedure
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 2
4.0 Heuristic (1)
 Definition: the study of the methods and rules of
discovery and invention.
 Heuristics are formalized as rules for choosing
those branches in a state space that are most
likely to lead to an acceptable problem solution.
 Heuristics are employed in two cases.
 A problem may not have an exact solution because of its
inherent ambiguities
 e.g. medical diagnosis, vision
 A problem may have an exact solution, but the
computational cost of finding it may be prohibitive.
 e.g. chess
 Heuristics attack this complexity by guiding the search
along the most promising path.
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 3
4.0 Heuristic (2)
 Heuristics are fallible
 A heuristic is only an informed guess of the next step to be
taken in solving a problem.
 Because heuristics use limited information, a heuristic can
lead a search algorithm to a suboptimal solution or fail to find
any solution at all.
 Application of AI using Heuristics
 Game playing and theorem proving
 not feasible to examine every inference that can be made
in a mathematics domain or every possible move that can
be made on a chessboard.
 Expert Systems
 Expert system designers extract and formalize the
heuristics which human expert uses to solve problems
efficiently.
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 4
4.0 Heuristic (3)
 A Heuristic for the Tic-Tac-Toe Game
 Exhaustive Search: 9!
 Symmetry reduction can decrease the search space a little:
12 * 7! (Fig. 4.1, p125, tp5)
 There are nine but really three initial moves: center, corner,
center of the grid.
 Symmetry reductions on the second level further reduce the
number of paths.
 A simple heuristic (Fig. 4.2, p126, tp6) can eliminate two-
thirds of the search space with the first move. (Fig. 4.3,
p126)
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 5
4.0 Heuristic (4)
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 6
4.0 Heuristic (5)
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 7
4.0 Heuristic (6)
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 8
A Cryptarithmetic Problem
 A useful heuristic can
help to select the best
guess to try first.
 If there is a letter that
participate in many
constraints, then it is a
good idea to prefer it to a
letter that participates in
a few.
Initial State
M=1, S=8 or 9
O=0 or 1  O=0
N=E or E+1  N=E+1
C2=1, N+R > 8, E<>9
N=3, R=8 or 9
2+D=Y or 2+D=10+Y
2+D=Y
N+R=10+E
R=9, S=8
2+D=10+Y
D=8+Y
D=8 or 9
Y=1
Y=0
Conflict
Conflict
E=2
C1=0 C1=1
SEND
+ MORE
MONEY
D=8 D=9
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 9
Hill Climbing Strategy(1)
 Simplest way of implementing heuristic search
 Expand the current state and evaluate the children and
select the best child for further expansion. Halt the search
when it reaches a state that is better than any of its children
(i.e. there is not a child who is better than the current state).
 Blind mountain climber
 go uphill along the steepest possible path until we can go no
farther.
 Because it keeps no history, the algorithm cannot recover from
failures.
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 10
 Major Problem: tendency to become stuck at
local maxima
 If the algorithm reach a local maximum, the algorithm fails to
find a solution.
 An example of local maxima in 8-puzzle
 In order to move a particular tile to its destination, other
tiles that are already in goal position have to be moved.
This move may temporarily worsen the board state.
 If the evaluation function is sufficiently
informative to avoid local maxima and infinite
path, hill climbing can be used effectively.
Hill Climbing Strategy(2)
G
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 11
Blocks World Problem(1)
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
initial state
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
goal state
A B
C
D
E
F
G
H
state 1
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
state 2-(a)
A B
C
D
E
F
G
H
state 2-(b)
A B
C
D
E
F
G
H
state 2-(c)
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 12
Blocks World Problem(2)
 Local: Add one point for every block that is resting on the
thing it is supposed to be resting on. Subtract one point for
every block that is sitting on the wrong thing.
 initial state
(-1) + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + (-1) = 4
 goal state
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 8
 state 1
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + (-1) = 5 + 1  6
 state 2-(a)
(-1) + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + (-1) = 4
 state 2-(b)
(-1) + 1 = 0
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + (-1) = 4  4
 state 2-(c)
1, -1, 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + (-1) = 4  4
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 13
Blocks World Problem (3)
 Global: For each block that has the correct support (i.e. the
complete structure underneath it is exactly as it should be),
add one point for every block in the support structure.
 For each block that has an incorrect support structure,
subtract one point for every block in the existing support
structure.
 initial state
(-7) + (-6) + (-5) + (-4) + (-3) + (-2) + (-1) = -28
 goal state
7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2 + 1 = 28
 state 1
(-6) + (-5) + (-4) + (-3) + (-2) + (-1) = -21
 state 2-(a)
(-7) + (-6) + (-5) + (-4) + (-3) + (-2) + (-1) = -28
 state 2-(b)
(-5) + (-4) + (-3) + (-2) + (-1) = -15
(-1) + 0 = -1  -16
 state 2-(c)
(-5) + (-4) + (-3) + (-2) + (-1) = -15
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 14
4.1.1 Best-First Search (1)
 Like the depth-first and breadth-first search, best-
first search uses two-lists.
 OPEN: to keep track of the current fringe of the search.
 CLOSED: to record states already visited.
 Order the states on OPEN according to some
heuristic estimate of their closeness to a goal.
 Each iteration of the loop considers the most promising state
on the OPEN list.
 Procedure best_first_search (p. 128, tp15~16)
 The states on OPEN is sorted according to their heuristic
values.
 If a child state is already on OPEN or CLOSED, the
algorithm checks if the child is reached by a shorter path.
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 15
4.1.1 Best-First Search (2)
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 16
4.1.1 Best-First Search (3)
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 17
4.1.1 Best-First Search(4)
 A hypothetical state space with heuristic evaluation
(Fig. 4.4 p129)
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 18
4.1.1 Best-First Search(4)
 A trace of the execution of best_first_search
1. OPEN=[A5]; CLOSED=[ ]
2. evaluate A5; OPEN=[B4,C4,D6]; CLOSED=[A5]
3. evaluate B4; OPEN=[C4,E5,F5,D6]; CLOSED=[B4,A5]
4. evaluate C4; OPEN=[H3,G4,E5,F5,D6]; CLOSED=[C4,B4,A5]
5. Evaluate H3; OPEN=[O2,P3,G4,E5,F5,D6];
CLOSED=[H3,C4,B4,A5] …………
 In the event a heuristic leads the search down a path that
proves incorrect, the algorithm shifts its focus to another part of
the space. A  B … (E, F)  C
Shift the focus from B to C, but the children of B (E and F) are
kept on OPEN in case the algorithm returns to them later.
 The goal of best-first search is to find the goal state
by looking at as few states as possible. (Fig. 4.5,
p130, tp19)
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 19
4.1.1 Best-First Search (5)
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 20
4.1.2. Heuristic Evaluation
Functions (1)
 Several heuristics for solving the 8-puzzle (Fig. 4.8,
p132, tp21)
 count the number of tiles out of place compared with the goal.
 sum all the distances by which the tiles are out of place.
 multiplies a small number times each direct tile reversal.(Fig.4.7)
 adds the sum of the distances out of place and 2 times the
number of direct reversals.
 The design of good heuristics is an empirical
problem: the measure of a heuristic must be its
actual performance on problem instances.
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 21
4.1.2 Heuristic Evaluation
Functions (2)
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 22
4.1.2 Heuristic Evaluation
Functions (3)
 With the same heuristic evaluations, it is
preferable to examine the state that is nearest to
the root.
 The distance from the starting state to its descendants can
be measured by maintaining a depth count for each state.
 f(n) = g(n) + h(n) where g(n) measures the actual
length of the path from the state n to the start
state, h(n) is a heuristic estimate of the distance
from state n to a goal.
 Example of heuristic f in 8-puzzle (Fig. 4.9, p133, tp23)
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 23
4.1.2 Heuristic Evaluation
Functions (4)
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 24
4.1.2 Heuristic Evaluation
Function (5)
 State space generated in heuristic search (Fig 4.10, p135, tp25)
 Each state is labeled with a letter and its heuristic weight, f(n) =
g(n) + h(n) where g(n)=actual distance from n to the start state,
and h(n)=number of tiles out of place.
 The successive stages of OPEN and CLOSED are:
1. OPEN=[a4]; CLOSED=[ ];
2. OPEN=[c4,b6,d6]; CLOSED=[a4];
3. OPEN=[e5,f5,g6,b6,d6]; CLOSED=[a4, c4];
4. OPEN=[f5,h6,g6,b6,d6,i7]; CLOSED=[a4,c4,e5]; ………….
 Although the state h, the immediate child of e, has the same
number of tiles out of place as f, it is one level deeper in the state
space. The depth measure, g(n), causes the algorithm to select f
for evaluation.
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 25
4.1.2 Heuristic
Evaluation
Function (6)
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 26
4.1.2 Heuristic Evaluation
Function (7)
1. Operations on states generate children of the state currently under
examination.
2. Each new state is checked to see whether it has occurred before,
thereby preventing loops
3. Each state n is given an f value equal to the sum of its depth in the
search space g(n) and a heuristic estimate of its distance to a goal
h(n). The h value guides search toward heuristically promising
states while the g value prevents search from persisting
indefinitely on a fruitless path.
4. States on OPEN are sorted by their f values. By keeping all states
on OPEN until they are examined or a goal is found, the algorithm
can go back from fruitless paths. At any one time, OPEN may
contain states at different levels of the state space graph
(Fig. 4.11), allowing full flexibility in changing the focus of the
search.
5. The efficiency of the algorithm can be improved by careful
maintenance of the OPEN and CLOSED lists.
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 27
Example of Best First Search(1)
a
b d
e
c
f g h
i j k
l m n
o p
q
initial node: a goal node: q

3
2
3
3
3
2
2
1
2
2
2 2
3 5 4
1
3 1
1
3
2
3
2
2




  

 
 
 
 G value: cost of getting from initial
node to the current node(1, 2…)
H value: estimated cost to goal
node(,  ...)
F = G + H
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 28
Example of Best First Search(2)
OPEN PATH
1. ((A 2)) Node A
2. ((B 4) (C 5) (D 8)) Node B (AB)
3. ((C 5) (D 8) (F 10) (E 11)) Node C (AC)
4. ((G 6) (D 8) (F 8) (E 11)) Node G (ACG)
5. ((D 8) (F 8) (E 11) (J 11) (K 12)) Node D (AD)
6. ((F 8) (H 10) (E 11) (J 11) (K 12)) Node F (ACF) /* (G 6) */
7. ((H 10) (I 10) (J 10) (E 11) (K 12)) Node H (ADH)
8. ((I 10) (J 10) (E 11) (K 11)) Node I (ACFI)
9. ((J 10) (E 11) (K 11) (L 13)) Node J (ACFJ)
10. ((M 10) (E 11) (K 11) (L 13)) Node M (ACFJM)
11. ((E 11) (K 11) (O 11) (L 13)) Node E (ABE)
12. ((K 11) (O 11) (L 13)) Node K (ADHK)
13. ((O 11) (L 13) (N 15)) Node O(ACFJM O)
14. ((Q 11) (L 13) (N 15)) (ACFJMOQ)
KU NLP
Heuristic Search 29
Example of Best First Search(3)
OPEN CLOSED PATH
[A2] [ ] A
[B4, C5, D8] [A2] (AB)
[C5, D8, F10, E11] [A2, B4] (AC)
[G6, D8, F8, E11] [A2, B4, C5] (ACG)
[D8, F8, E11, J11, K12] [A2, B4, C5, G6] (AD)
[F8, H10, E11, J11, K12] [A2, B4, C5, G6, D8] (ACF)
[H10, I10, J10, E11, K12] [A2,B4.C5.G6,D8,F8] (ADH)
[I10, J10, E11, K11] [A2,B4,C5,G6,D8,F8,H10] (ACFI)
[J10,E11,K11,L13] [A2,B4,C5,G6,D8,F8,H10,I10] (ACFJ)
[M10,E11,K11,L13] [A2,B4,C5,G6,D8,F8,H10,I10,J10] (ACFJM)
[E11,K11,O11,L13] [A2,B4,C5,G6,D8,F8,H10,I10,J10,M10] (ABE)
[K11,O11,L13] [A2,B4,C5,G6,D8,F8,H10,I10,J10,M10,E11] (ADHK)
[O11,L13,N15] [A2,B4,C5,G6,D8,F8,H10,I10,J10,M10,E11,K11]
(ACFJM O)
[Q11,L13,N15] [A2,B4,C5,G6,D8,F8,H10,I10,J10,M10,E11,K11,O11]
(ACFJMOQ)

More Related Content

PPTX
Heuristic search
PPT
Heuristic search problem-solving str.ppt
PPTX
Heuristic search
PPT
M4 heuristics
PPT
Presentacion nro 1 redes y comunicaciones de datos
PPT
m4-heuristics.ppt
PPT
AI Lecture 4 (informed search and exploration)
PPTX
Control Strategies in AI
Heuristic search
Heuristic search problem-solving str.ppt
Heuristic search
M4 heuristics
Presentacion nro 1 redes y comunicaciones de datos
m4-heuristics.ppt
AI Lecture 4 (informed search and exploration)
Control Strategies in AI

Similar to Heuristics Search 3249989_slideplayer.ppt (20)

PPTX
Informed and Uninformed search Strategies
PDF
Heuristic search
PPT
M4 Heuristics
PPT
Searchadditional2
PDF
AI3391 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE UNIT II notes.pdf
PPT
Hill climbing
PPT
heuristic search
PPTX
Informed Search in Artifical Intelligence
PPT
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE- informed search strategies
PPT
2-Heuristic Search.ppt
PPTX
AI UNIT-1-BREADTH and BEST FIRST SEARCH.pptx
PDF
Artificial Intelligence
PPT
Lecture 11 Informed Search
PDF
02LocalSearch.pdf
PDF
shamwari dzerwendo.mmmmmmfmmfmfkksrkrttkt
PPTX
BFS,DFS, BEST FIRST,A-STAR,AO-STAR SEARCH.pptx
DOCX
searching
PDF
Unit-3 (2).pdf WEAK SLOT-AND-FILLER STRUCTURES
PPT
Heuristic Search Techniques {Artificial Intelligence}
PPTX
Heuristic Search, Best First Search.pptx
Informed and Uninformed search Strategies
Heuristic search
M4 Heuristics
Searchadditional2
AI3391 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE UNIT II notes.pdf
Hill climbing
heuristic search
Informed Search in Artifical Intelligence
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE- informed search strategies
2-Heuristic Search.ppt
AI UNIT-1-BREADTH and BEST FIRST SEARCH.pptx
Artificial Intelligence
Lecture 11 Informed Search
02LocalSearch.pdf
shamwari dzerwendo.mmmmmmfmmfmfkksrkrttkt
BFS,DFS, BEST FIRST,A-STAR,AO-STAR SEARCH.pptx
searching
Unit-3 (2).pdf WEAK SLOT-AND-FILLER STRUCTURES
Heuristic Search Techniques {Artificial Intelligence}
Heuristic Search, Best First Search.pptx
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
GDM (1) (1).pptx small presentation for students
PDF
01-Introduction-to-Information-Management.pdf
PPTX
Pharmacology of Heart Failure /Pharmacotherapy of CHF
PDF
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
PDF
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
PDF
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
PPTX
PPT- ENG7_QUARTER1_LESSON1_WEEK1. IMAGERY -DESCRIPTIONS pptx.pptx
PDF
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
PDF
VCE English Exam - Section C Student Revision Booklet
PDF
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ 4 KỸ NĂNG TIẾNG ANH 9 GLOBAL SUCCESS - CẢ NĂM - BÁM SÁT FORM Đ...
PPTX
Microbial diseases, their pathogenesis and prophylaxis
PPTX
human mycosis Human fungal infections are called human mycosis..pptx
PPTX
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
PPTX
PPH.pptx obstetrics and gynecology in nursing
PDF
Abdominal Access Techniques with Prof. Dr. R K Mishra
PDF
ANTIBIOTICS.pptx.pdf………………… xxxxxxxxxxxxx
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PPTX
Cell Types and Its function , kingdom of life
PPTX
Institutional Correction lecture only . . .
GDM (1) (1).pptx small presentation for students
01-Introduction-to-Information-Management.pdf
Pharmacology of Heart Failure /Pharmacotherapy of CHF
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
PPT- ENG7_QUARTER1_LESSON1_WEEK1. IMAGERY -DESCRIPTIONS pptx.pptx
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
VCE English Exam - Section C Student Revision Booklet
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ 4 KỸ NĂNG TIẾNG ANH 9 GLOBAL SUCCESS - CẢ NĂM - BÁM SÁT FORM Đ...
Microbial diseases, their pathogenesis and prophylaxis
human mycosis Human fungal infections are called human mycosis..pptx
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
PPH.pptx obstetrics and gynecology in nursing
Abdominal Access Techniques with Prof. Dr. R K Mishra
ANTIBIOTICS.pptx.pdf………………… xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
Cell Types and Its function , kingdom of life
Institutional Correction lecture only . . .
Ad

Heuristics Search 3249989_slideplayer.ppt

  • 1. KU NLP Heuristic Search 1 Ch 4. Heuristic Search  4.0 Introduction(Heuristic)  4.1 An Algorithm for Heuristic Search  4.1.1 Implementing Best-First Search  4.1.2 Implementing Heuristic Evaluation Functions  4.1.3 Heuristic Search and Expert Systems  4.3 Using Heuristics in Games  4.3.1 Minimax Procedure  4.3.2 Minimaxing to Fixed Ply Depth  4.3.3 Alpha-Beta Procedure
  • 2. KU NLP Heuristic Search 2 4.0 Heuristic (1)  Definition: the study of the methods and rules of discovery and invention.  Heuristics are formalized as rules for choosing those branches in a state space that are most likely to lead to an acceptable problem solution.  Heuristics are employed in two cases.  A problem may not have an exact solution because of its inherent ambiguities  e.g. medical diagnosis, vision  A problem may have an exact solution, but the computational cost of finding it may be prohibitive.  e.g. chess  Heuristics attack this complexity by guiding the search along the most promising path.
  • 3. KU NLP Heuristic Search 3 4.0 Heuristic (2)  Heuristics are fallible  A heuristic is only an informed guess of the next step to be taken in solving a problem.  Because heuristics use limited information, a heuristic can lead a search algorithm to a suboptimal solution or fail to find any solution at all.  Application of AI using Heuristics  Game playing and theorem proving  not feasible to examine every inference that can be made in a mathematics domain or every possible move that can be made on a chessboard.  Expert Systems  Expert system designers extract and formalize the heuristics which human expert uses to solve problems efficiently.
  • 4. KU NLP Heuristic Search 4 4.0 Heuristic (3)  A Heuristic for the Tic-Tac-Toe Game  Exhaustive Search: 9!  Symmetry reduction can decrease the search space a little: 12 * 7! (Fig. 4.1, p125, tp5)  There are nine but really three initial moves: center, corner, center of the grid.  Symmetry reductions on the second level further reduce the number of paths.  A simple heuristic (Fig. 4.2, p126, tp6) can eliminate two- thirds of the search space with the first move. (Fig. 4.3, p126)
  • 5. KU NLP Heuristic Search 5 4.0 Heuristic (4)
  • 6. KU NLP Heuristic Search 6 4.0 Heuristic (5)
  • 7. KU NLP Heuristic Search 7 4.0 Heuristic (6)
  • 8. KU NLP Heuristic Search 8 A Cryptarithmetic Problem  A useful heuristic can help to select the best guess to try first.  If there is a letter that participate in many constraints, then it is a good idea to prefer it to a letter that participates in a few. Initial State M=1, S=8 or 9 O=0 or 1  O=0 N=E or E+1  N=E+1 C2=1, N+R > 8, E<>9 N=3, R=8 or 9 2+D=Y or 2+D=10+Y 2+D=Y N+R=10+E R=9, S=8 2+D=10+Y D=8+Y D=8 or 9 Y=1 Y=0 Conflict Conflict E=2 C1=0 C1=1 SEND + MORE MONEY D=8 D=9
  • 9. KU NLP Heuristic Search 9 Hill Climbing Strategy(1)  Simplest way of implementing heuristic search  Expand the current state and evaluate the children and select the best child for further expansion. Halt the search when it reaches a state that is better than any of its children (i.e. there is not a child who is better than the current state).  Blind mountain climber  go uphill along the steepest possible path until we can go no farther.  Because it keeps no history, the algorithm cannot recover from failures.
  • 10. KU NLP Heuristic Search 10  Major Problem: tendency to become stuck at local maxima  If the algorithm reach a local maximum, the algorithm fails to find a solution.  An example of local maxima in 8-puzzle  In order to move a particular tile to its destination, other tiles that are already in goal position have to be moved. This move may temporarily worsen the board state.  If the evaluation function is sufficiently informative to avoid local maxima and infinite path, hill climbing can be used effectively. Hill Climbing Strategy(2) G
  • 11. KU NLP Heuristic Search 11 Blocks World Problem(1) A B C D E F G H initial state A B C D E F G H goal state A B C D E F G H state 1 A B C D E F G H state 2-(a) A B C D E F G H state 2-(b) A B C D E F G H state 2-(c)
  • 12. KU NLP Heuristic Search 12 Blocks World Problem(2)  Local: Add one point for every block that is resting on the thing it is supposed to be resting on. Subtract one point for every block that is sitting on the wrong thing.  initial state (-1) + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + (-1) = 4  goal state 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 8  state 1 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + (-1) = 5 + 1  6  state 2-(a) (-1) + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + (-1) = 4  state 2-(b) (-1) + 1 = 0 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + (-1) = 4  4  state 2-(c) 1, -1, 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + (-1) = 4  4
  • 13. KU NLP Heuristic Search 13 Blocks World Problem (3)  Global: For each block that has the correct support (i.e. the complete structure underneath it is exactly as it should be), add one point for every block in the support structure.  For each block that has an incorrect support structure, subtract one point for every block in the existing support structure.  initial state (-7) + (-6) + (-5) + (-4) + (-3) + (-2) + (-1) = -28  goal state 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2 + 1 = 28  state 1 (-6) + (-5) + (-4) + (-3) + (-2) + (-1) = -21  state 2-(a) (-7) + (-6) + (-5) + (-4) + (-3) + (-2) + (-1) = -28  state 2-(b) (-5) + (-4) + (-3) + (-2) + (-1) = -15 (-1) + 0 = -1  -16  state 2-(c) (-5) + (-4) + (-3) + (-2) + (-1) = -15
  • 14. KU NLP Heuristic Search 14 4.1.1 Best-First Search (1)  Like the depth-first and breadth-first search, best- first search uses two-lists.  OPEN: to keep track of the current fringe of the search.  CLOSED: to record states already visited.  Order the states on OPEN according to some heuristic estimate of their closeness to a goal.  Each iteration of the loop considers the most promising state on the OPEN list.  Procedure best_first_search (p. 128, tp15~16)  The states on OPEN is sorted according to their heuristic values.  If a child state is already on OPEN or CLOSED, the algorithm checks if the child is reached by a shorter path.
  • 15. KU NLP Heuristic Search 15 4.1.1 Best-First Search (2)
  • 16. KU NLP Heuristic Search 16 4.1.1 Best-First Search (3)
  • 17. KU NLP Heuristic Search 17 4.1.1 Best-First Search(4)  A hypothetical state space with heuristic evaluation (Fig. 4.4 p129)
  • 18. KU NLP Heuristic Search 18 4.1.1 Best-First Search(4)  A trace of the execution of best_first_search 1. OPEN=[A5]; CLOSED=[ ] 2. evaluate A5; OPEN=[B4,C4,D6]; CLOSED=[A5] 3. evaluate B4; OPEN=[C4,E5,F5,D6]; CLOSED=[B4,A5] 4. evaluate C4; OPEN=[H3,G4,E5,F5,D6]; CLOSED=[C4,B4,A5] 5. Evaluate H3; OPEN=[O2,P3,G4,E5,F5,D6]; CLOSED=[H3,C4,B4,A5] …………  In the event a heuristic leads the search down a path that proves incorrect, the algorithm shifts its focus to another part of the space. A  B … (E, F)  C Shift the focus from B to C, but the children of B (E and F) are kept on OPEN in case the algorithm returns to them later.  The goal of best-first search is to find the goal state by looking at as few states as possible. (Fig. 4.5, p130, tp19)
  • 19. KU NLP Heuristic Search 19 4.1.1 Best-First Search (5)
  • 20. KU NLP Heuristic Search 20 4.1.2. Heuristic Evaluation Functions (1)  Several heuristics for solving the 8-puzzle (Fig. 4.8, p132, tp21)  count the number of tiles out of place compared with the goal.  sum all the distances by which the tiles are out of place.  multiplies a small number times each direct tile reversal.(Fig.4.7)  adds the sum of the distances out of place and 2 times the number of direct reversals.  The design of good heuristics is an empirical problem: the measure of a heuristic must be its actual performance on problem instances.
  • 21. KU NLP Heuristic Search 21 4.1.2 Heuristic Evaluation Functions (2)
  • 22. KU NLP Heuristic Search 22 4.1.2 Heuristic Evaluation Functions (3)  With the same heuristic evaluations, it is preferable to examine the state that is nearest to the root.  The distance from the starting state to its descendants can be measured by maintaining a depth count for each state.  f(n) = g(n) + h(n) where g(n) measures the actual length of the path from the state n to the start state, h(n) is a heuristic estimate of the distance from state n to a goal.  Example of heuristic f in 8-puzzle (Fig. 4.9, p133, tp23)
  • 23. KU NLP Heuristic Search 23 4.1.2 Heuristic Evaluation Functions (4)
  • 24. KU NLP Heuristic Search 24 4.1.2 Heuristic Evaluation Function (5)  State space generated in heuristic search (Fig 4.10, p135, tp25)  Each state is labeled with a letter and its heuristic weight, f(n) = g(n) + h(n) where g(n)=actual distance from n to the start state, and h(n)=number of tiles out of place.  The successive stages of OPEN and CLOSED are: 1. OPEN=[a4]; CLOSED=[ ]; 2. OPEN=[c4,b6,d6]; CLOSED=[a4]; 3. OPEN=[e5,f5,g6,b6,d6]; CLOSED=[a4, c4]; 4. OPEN=[f5,h6,g6,b6,d6,i7]; CLOSED=[a4,c4,e5]; ………….  Although the state h, the immediate child of e, has the same number of tiles out of place as f, it is one level deeper in the state space. The depth measure, g(n), causes the algorithm to select f for evaluation.
  • 25. KU NLP Heuristic Search 25 4.1.2 Heuristic Evaluation Function (6)
  • 26. KU NLP Heuristic Search 26 4.1.2 Heuristic Evaluation Function (7) 1. Operations on states generate children of the state currently under examination. 2. Each new state is checked to see whether it has occurred before, thereby preventing loops 3. Each state n is given an f value equal to the sum of its depth in the search space g(n) and a heuristic estimate of its distance to a goal h(n). The h value guides search toward heuristically promising states while the g value prevents search from persisting indefinitely on a fruitless path. 4. States on OPEN are sorted by their f values. By keeping all states on OPEN until they are examined or a goal is found, the algorithm can go back from fruitless paths. At any one time, OPEN may contain states at different levels of the state space graph (Fig. 4.11), allowing full flexibility in changing the focus of the search. 5. The efficiency of the algorithm can be improved by careful maintenance of the OPEN and CLOSED lists.
  • 27. KU NLP Heuristic Search 27 Example of Best First Search(1) a b d e c f g h i j k l m n o p q initial node: a goal node: q  3 2 3 3 3 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 3 5 4 1 3 1 1 3 2 3 2 2                G value: cost of getting from initial node to the current node(1, 2…) H value: estimated cost to goal node(,  ...) F = G + H
  • 28. KU NLP Heuristic Search 28 Example of Best First Search(2) OPEN PATH 1. ((A 2)) Node A 2. ((B 4) (C 5) (D 8)) Node B (AB) 3. ((C 5) (D 8) (F 10) (E 11)) Node C (AC) 4. ((G 6) (D 8) (F 8) (E 11)) Node G (ACG) 5. ((D 8) (F 8) (E 11) (J 11) (K 12)) Node D (AD) 6. ((F 8) (H 10) (E 11) (J 11) (K 12)) Node F (ACF) /* (G 6) */ 7. ((H 10) (I 10) (J 10) (E 11) (K 12)) Node H (ADH) 8. ((I 10) (J 10) (E 11) (K 11)) Node I (ACFI) 9. ((J 10) (E 11) (K 11) (L 13)) Node J (ACFJ) 10. ((M 10) (E 11) (K 11) (L 13)) Node M (ACFJM) 11. ((E 11) (K 11) (O 11) (L 13)) Node E (ABE) 12. ((K 11) (O 11) (L 13)) Node K (ADHK) 13. ((O 11) (L 13) (N 15)) Node O(ACFJM O) 14. ((Q 11) (L 13) (N 15)) (ACFJMOQ)
  • 29. KU NLP Heuristic Search 29 Example of Best First Search(3) OPEN CLOSED PATH [A2] [ ] A [B4, C5, D8] [A2] (AB) [C5, D8, F10, E11] [A2, B4] (AC) [G6, D8, F8, E11] [A2, B4, C5] (ACG) [D8, F8, E11, J11, K12] [A2, B4, C5, G6] (AD) [F8, H10, E11, J11, K12] [A2, B4, C5, G6, D8] (ACF) [H10, I10, J10, E11, K12] [A2,B4.C5.G6,D8,F8] (ADH) [I10, J10, E11, K11] [A2,B4,C5,G6,D8,F8,H10] (ACFI) [J10,E11,K11,L13] [A2,B4,C5,G6,D8,F8,H10,I10] (ACFJ) [M10,E11,K11,L13] [A2,B4,C5,G6,D8,F8,H10,I10,J10] (ACFJM) [E11,K11,O11,L13] [A2,B4,C5,G6,D8,F8,H10,I10,J10,M10] (ABE) [K11,O11,L13] [A2,B4,C5,G6,D8,F8,H10,I10,J10,M10,E11] (ADHK) [O11,L13,N15] [A2,B4,C5,G6,D8,F8,H10,I10,J10,M10,E11,K11] (ACFJM O) [Q11,L13,N15] [A2,B4,C5,G6,D8,F8,H10,I10,J10,M10,E11,K11,O11] (ACFJMOQ)