SlideShare a Scribd company logo
HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING
MAHAMMAD SHAKHEEL B
PHARMACOLOGY DEPARTMENT
•HTS IS A METHOD FOR SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTATION
ESPECIALLY USED IN DRUG DISCOVERY AND RELEVANT TO
THE FIELDS OF BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY.
•DATA PROCESSING, AND CONTROL SOFTWARE, LIQUID
HANDLING DEVICES, SENSITIVE DETECTORS- HTS ALLOWS
A RESEARCHER TO QUICKLY CONDUCT CHEMICAL,
GENETIC AND PHARMACOLOGICAL TESTS.
•THE RESULTS OF THESE EXPERIMENTS PROVIDE FOR
DRUG DESIGN AND ROLE OF BIOCHEMICAL PROCESS IN
BIOLOGY.
High throughput screening
 Assays for HTS and validation play a key role in drug discovery and
development.
 Currently, most HTS assays are rely on the use of fluorescent and radioactive
labels to messure bichemical reactions or monitor cellular responses.
 Lables have adverse effect on binding interaction being investigated leading
to false conclusion about binding properties of analyte
 Lables also introduce additional complexity and assay develoment time to the
procees.
Commonly used terms in drug discovery
High throughput screen: an optimised, miniaturised assay format that
enables the testing of > 100,000 chemically diverse compounds per day.
Assay: a test system in which biological activity can be detected
Hit: a molecule with confirmed concentration-dependent activity in a screen,
and known chemical structure. The output of most screens
 Progressible hit: a representative of a compound series with activity via
acceptable mechanism of action and some limited structure-activity
relationship information
 Lead: a compound with potential (as measured by potency, selectivity,
physico-chemical properties, absence of toxicity or novelty) to progress to a
full drug development programme
 Pharmacophore: minimal structure with essential features for activity
Drug discovery

Initial characterisation
trials

Regulatory approval sought to start
trials in humans
Pre-clinical 
Clinical trials Phases I, II, III

Submission of marketing/manufacturing
authorisation application to regulatory authorities
or refuse) licences

Product goes on sale

Post-marketing surveillance
Regulatory authorities review
information and grant (
Library of compounds

In vitro screening: human/animal
receptor/enzyme assay; reporter system

Hits/lead

Biochemical, tissue or animal model of
function

lead

Animal model of therapeutic target

ADME, formulation, acute toxicology
The life history of a successful drug
High throughput screening for drug discovery
FACT 1: recent understanding of disease mechanisms has dramatically
increased no. of protein targets for new drug treatment
FACT 2: new technologies have increased the no. of drugs that can be tested
for activity at these targets.
high throughput screening (HTS) is 1° tool for early-stage drug discovery
 HTS is process by which large nos. of compounds are rapidly tested for
their ability to modify the properties of a selected biological target.
 Goal is to identify ‘hits’ or ‘leads’
- affect target in desired manner
- active at fairly low concs (∴ more likely to show specificity)
- new structure
 The greater the no. and diversity of compounds screened, the more
successful screen is likely to be.
 HTS = 50,000-100,000 cpds screened per day!!!
Goals and limitations of HTS
Aim of screening is to find progressible hits, not to discover
the lead molecule itself
The majority of drug targets are
a) G-protein coupled 7 TM receptors
b) nuclear receptors
c) ion channels
d) enzymes
progressible hit

targeted synthetic design

Lead
 Take top 100 drugs - 18 bind to GPCR
- 10 bind to nuclear receptors
- 16 bind to ion channels
- most of remainder inhibit enzymes
 Knowledge gained from one drug target can be transferred to related targets.
 e.g molecular technology required to work with 1 GPCR is useful for other GPCRs, including
cloning and expression systems and info on structure and ligands.
Implementation of HTS
Need 4 elements:
1) suitable libraries of compounds
Source of chemicals for screen:
- in-house collection (5x105
- 106
) of diverse samples.
- supplement by acquisitions from specialist companies
-combinatorial chemistry allows synthesis of large no of diverse molecules.
2) assay method configured for automation
Assay requirements:
a) pharmacology of the target should not be altered by the molecular
manipulations
b) cost of assay development and reagents low
c) easy to use and suitable for automation and miniaturisation. Use multi-well
plates: 96, 192, 384, 864, 1536 and assay requiring few manipulations, no
plate-o-plate transfers or washing steps
d) robust signal-to-noise ratio. Hit defined as activity above a certain threshold
e.g. Ki < 5 nM
Emax >30% increase over basal
e) ideally be non-radioactive
 Often express target genes in appropriate host systems
e.g. bacterial, yeast, viral, invertebrate and mammalian cells.
a) Radioligand binding assays
• Measures affinity of library compounds for target.
• Need high affinity radioligand that binds to site of
interest and cells transfected with target site.
• measure competitive displacement of radioligand from target site
• Specificity can be assessed by including other possible targets in screen
relative affinity for multiple sites
PROBLEM: hard to miniaturise radioactive assays (counting takes too long).
Alternative is to use fluorescence techniques.
b) Cell-based fluorescence and radiotracer assays
Useful for measuring ion-channel function
e.g.measure movement of Ca2+
in a fluorescent-imaging plate-reader (FLIPR)
• cells are loaded with the fluorescent Ca2+
indicator Fluo-3
• depolarisation with high KCl activates Ca2+
channels and allows Ca2+
entry
Ca2+
Ca2+
-60 mV
fluorescence
signal
488 nm
Ca2+
Ca2+
-30 mV
increased
fluorescence
488 nm
(a) rest (b) with KCl
c) melanophore assays
Melanophores = pigmented cells derived from neural crest. Prepare
immortalised melanophores from Xenopus laevis
Gi
melanophores
transfection
CMV Hß2-AR
Plasmid vector
AGGREGATED
MELANOSOMES

melatonin
DISPERSED
MELANOSOMES

light
Gs, Gq
ß agonist
ß antagonist
d) Reporter gene assays
Rather than measure the immediate cellular response, it may be easier to
measure the subsequent transcriptional change
isoprenaline binding to ß-adrenceptors

 cAMP

PKA activation and translocation to nucleus

phosphorylation of transcription factor CREB that recognises cAMP response
elements (CREs)

 expression of reporter gene whose transcription is driven by an enhancer
containing CREs

Measure reporter gene product in HTS format
• Examples of reporter genes: ß-galactosidase; luciferase; alkaline phosphatase;
green fluorescent protein.
• Useful for measuring responses from Gi, Gs or Gq-coupled receptors
All screens have danger of false negatives and false positives
Not such a problem waste time and resources
HTS is less useful for evaluating - bioavailability
- pharmackinetics
- toxicity
- absolute specificity
3) robotics workstation
• Robots handle assays in multi-well formats.
- sample dilutions
- sample dispensing
- plate washing
 Hard to automate cell lysis or permeabilisation steps (necessary for many 2nd
messenger responses).
• Full automation allows 24 h continuous operation without requiring shift work.
• More efficient and economical.
4) computerised data handling system
•A great deal of data is generated. Must be accurate and reproducible.
Need good computerised data handling systems.
Which strategy is best for hit identification?
When a target is identified, a decision has to be made about which chemicals to
screen, in order to identify potential lead compounds.
Random screening
All possible drug molecules screened against target.
Estimated no. of possible drug molecules is ± 1040
!!!
This is simply not possible.
 Focussed screening
 A limited number of compounds are pre-selected for screening.
 Has proved successful as a hit generation strategy.
 Useful when 3D structure of target is known (e.g. crystal structure of a
receptor)
 - use computer modelling to predict optimal structure to interact with target
 - use known ligand to construct 3D pharmacophore
 In either case, select compounds from library or design new compounds and
screen.
 Focussed screening will find novel hits BUT the required information may
not be available.
Choice of expression system for GPCRs
• Ligand binding and transduction properties are effected by cell type, receptor
density, and presence of signal transductional elements
ADVANTAGES
Yeast-based systems e.g. Saccharomyces cerevisiae
(also used to express protein tyrosine kinases, peptide hormones and functional ion channels)
- grow rapidly
- easy and cheap
- readily amenable to genetic manipulation
- tolerant to solvents used to dissolve drugs
e.g.DMSO, methanol
Bacterial cells e.g. E.coli
- grow rapidly
- easy and cheap
DISADVANTAGES
- May not get functional coupling of transfected GPCRs to
yeast G-proteins. Overcome this by coupling GPCRs to yeast
pheromone response pathway  agonists promote cell growth
or activity of reporter gene construct
- may not get proper post-tranlational modification e.g. many
GPCRs are not glycosylated in yeast, or cell surface
expression.
- Low expression levels
- Some post-translational modifications not performed
- no endogenous G-proteins
ADVANTAGES
Baculovirus/insect cell system e.g. Sf9 cells
- high levels of expression of functional protein
- ligand binding properties similar to native
receptor
- can co-express receptor and mammalian
G-proteins
- ideal for structural analysis
Mammalian cells e.g. CHO, HEK
- most authentic background for expression of GPCRs
• protein synthesis
• membrane insertion
• post-translational modification
• lipid composition of membranes
- receptors usually functional
DISADVANTAGES
- production of permanent cell lines may be a
difficult and lengthy process
- can be expensive
- receptor promiscuity (different G-proteins activated
by 1 receptor  multiple signals)
- no. of suitable G-proteins may be limited
- GPCR might not be glycosylated
- GPCR is occasionally inactive
Yeast-based screen and selection for identification of agonists for a human orphan
GPCR
Yeast
ligand
Yeast
receptor
Yeast G
protein
arrest


human
ligand
human
receptor
human G
protein
growth


(a) In yeast, normal GPCR-initiated pathway
results in cell cycle arrest in response to
agonist
(b) Substitution of human orphan GPCR and
human Gα protein yields a strain that only grows if
receptor is stimulated
Spot individual cpds onto lawn of modified
yeast. Detect agonists by growth of yeast on the
plate around the site of cpd application
orphan
receptor
peptide
growth
peptide
expression
library
peptide
ligand


(c) alternatively, introduce a random peptide expression library; cells will only grow if the peptide stimulates the
receptor
REFERENCE
 Short protocols in Pharmacology and Drug discovery edited by Enna S
J, et al.
 Drug discovery and evaluation Pharmacological assy by Vogel H G and
Vogel H G.
 Modern methods of Drug Discovery by Hillisch, A and Hilgenfeld.
THANK
YOU

More Related Content

PPTX
Target discovery and validation
PPT
High Throughput Screening
PPT
Drug development process
PDF
1. An Overview of Drug Discovery Process.pdf
PPTX
Target discovery and Validation - Role of proteomics
PPTX
Role of nuclicacid microarray &protein micro array for drug discovery process
PPTX
Importance of guidelines in regulatory toxicity testing
Target discovery and validation
High Throughput Screening
Drug development process
1. An Overview of Drug Discovery Process.pdf
Target discovery and Validation - Role of proteomics
Role of nuclicacid microarray &protein micro array for drug discovery process
Importance of guidelines in regulatory toxicity testing

What's hot (20)

PPTX
hit identification.pptx
PPTX
Target identification and validation
PPTX
economics of drug discovery.pptx
PPTX
_Lead_identification_and_optimization_.pptx
PPTX
High throughput screening
PPTX
Toxicokinetic evaluation in preclinical studies.pptx
PPTX
Clinical trial study team
PPTX
High throughput screening
PDF
2. Lead Identification.pdf
PPTX
Herg assay,Structure, Various screening methods and Advantages
PPTX
Acute inhalational toxicity studies.pptx
PPTX
HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING.pptx
PPTX
Alternative methods to animal toxicity testing
PPTX
Suhas (chronopharmacology of diabetes)
PPTX
Toxicological Approach to Drug Discovery
PPT
pharmacogenomics
PDF
Computational prediction of protein structure homology and threading modeling
PDF
Assignment on Alternatives to Animal Screening Method
PPTX
Target identification
PPTX
CNS, RESPIRATORY & CVS (hERG assay) SAFETY PHARMACOLOGY STUDIES
hit identification.pptx
Target identification and validation
economics of drug discovery.pptx
_Lead_identification_and_optimization_.pptx
High throughput screening
Toxicokinetic evaluation in preclinical studies.pptx
Clinical trial study team
High throughput screening
2. Lead Identification.pdf
Herg assay,Structure, Various screening methods and Advantages
Acute inhalational toxicity studies.pptx
HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING.pptx
Alternative methods to animal toxicity testing
Suhas (chronopharmacology of diabetes)
Toxicological Approach to Drug Discovery
pharmacogenomics
Computational prediction of protein structure homology and threading modeling
Assignment on Alternatives to Animal Screening Method
Target identification
CNS, RESPIRATORY & CVS (hERG assay) SAFETY PHARMACOLOGY STUDIES
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPT
FDA Data Standards An Update
PDF
―Study of Ligand Based Virtual Screening Tools in Computer Aided Drug Designi...
PDF
List of cell based assay
PPTX
Micro array based comparative genomic hybridisation -Dr Yogesh D
PPTX
Introduction to CpG island power point presentation
PPT
Ligand binding
PDF
FDA/EMA Inspection - Regulatory Expectations in Early Phase Clinical Trials
 
PPTX
Medical Utopias: The Promise of Emerging Technologies
PPTX
PHYSICAL MAPPING STRATEGIES IN GENOMICS
PPTX
Cell based assays presentation V2_03_2012
PPTX
High throughput screening
PDF
Cell Based Assays (2010) Ella
PPT
Hyaluronic Acid Presentation
PPTX
Applications of Bio systems Engineering (Artificial Organs)
PPTX
Chitosan preparation
PDF
Reporter assay and q pcr application 2012
PPTX
Random Amplified polymorphic DNA. RAPD
PPTX
Collagen! - The connective Tissue Protein
PPTX
Synthetic polymer
PPT
Dna methylation
FDA Data Standards An Update
―Study of Ligand Based Virtual Screening Tools in Computer Aided Drug Designi...
List of cell based assay
Micro array based comparative genomic hybridisation -Dr Yogesh D
Introduction to CpG island power point presentation
Ligand binding
FDA/EMA Inspection - Regulatory Expectations in Early Phase Clinical Trials
 
Medical Utopias: The Promise of Emerging Technologies
PHYSICAL MAPPING STRATEGIES IN GENOMICS
Cell based assays presentation V2_03_2012
High throughput screening
Cell Based Assays (2010) Ella
Hyaluronic Acid Presentation
Applications of Bio systems Engineering (Artificial Organs)
Chitosan preparation
Reporter assay and q pcr application 2012
Random Amplified polymorphic DNA. RAPD
Collagen! - The connective Tissue Protein
Synthetic polymer
Dna methylation
Ad

Similar to High throughput screenig (20)

PPTX
02.High through output screening.pptx
PPTX
PHYTOCHEMISTRY.ppt studie exames and prepr
PPTX
Back Rapid lead compounds discovery through high-throughput screening
PPTX
New high thoughput screening copy
PPTX
High Throughput Screening Technology
PPTX
HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING Technology
PDF
High Throughput Screening drugg discovery.pdf
PDF
GEN Reprint_LC1536
PPTX
In Silico Assessment of Lead Toxicity: Computational Insights
PPTX
highthroughputscreening-140313095833-phpapp01.pptx
PPTX
High throughput screening for lead discovery .pptx
PPTX
High Throughput Screening for Glycogen and Polyglucosan
PPTX
High throughput screening
PDF
High-Throughput Screening of Natural Product Libraries.pdf
PDF
Where do recent small molecule clinical development candidates come from?
PPTX
Bioinformatics t9-t10-biocheminformatics v2014
PPTX
2015 bioinformatics bio_cheminformatics_wim_vancriekinge
PPSX
Metabolic engineering approaches in medicinal plants
PPTX
2016 bioinformatics i_bio_cheminformatics_wimvancriekinge
02.High through output screening.pptx
PHYTOCHEMISTRY.ppt studie exames and prepr
Back Rapid lead compounds discovery through high-throughput screening
New high thoughput screening copy
High Throughput Screening Technology
HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING Technology
High Throughput Screening drugg discovery.pdf
GEN Reprint_LC1536
In Silico Assessment of Lead Toxicity: Computational Insights
highthroughputscreening-140313095833-phpapp01.pptx
High throughput screening for lead discovery .pptx
High Throughput Screening for Glycogen and Polyglucosan
High throughput screening
High-Throughput Screening of Natural Product Libraries.pdf
Where do recent small molecule clinical development candidates come from?
Bioinformatics t9-t10-biocheminformatics v2014
2015 bioinformatics bio_cheminformatics_wim_vancriekinge
Metabolic engineering approaches in medicinal plants
2016 bioinformatics i_bio_cheminformatics_wimvancriekinge

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Human Reproduction: Anatomy, Physiology & Clinical Insights.pptx
PPTX
Hearthhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
PDF
Extended-Expanded-role-of-Nurses.pdf is a key for student Nurses
PPT
HIV lecture final - student.pptfghjjkkejjhhge
PDF
focused on the development and application of glycoHILIC, pepHILIC, and comm...
PDF
OSCE SERIES ( Questions & Answers ) - Set 5.pdf
DOCX
PEADIATRICS NOTES.docx lecture notes for medical students
PPTX
Electrolyte Disturbance in Paediatric - Nitthi.pptx
PPTX
Introduction to Medical Microbiology for 400L Medical Students
PPT
Dermatology for member of royalcollege.ppt
PDF
The_EHRA_Book_of_Interventional Electrophysiology.pdf
PPTX
Enteric duplication cyst, etiology and management
PDF
OSCE SERIES - Set 7 ( Questions & Answers ).pdf
PPTX
09. Diabetes in Pregnancy/ gestational.pptx
PDF
SEMEN PREPARATION TECHNIGUES FOR INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION.pdf
PDF
TISSUE LECTURE (anatomy and physiology )
PPTX
1. Basic chemist of Biomolecule (1).pptx
PPTX
Cardiovascular - antihypertensive medical backgrounds
PPTX
Neonate anatomy and physiology presentation
PPT
neurology Member of Royal College of Physicians (MRCP).ppt
Human Reproduction: Anatomy, Physiology & Clinical Insights.pptx
Hearthhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Extended-Expanded-role-of-Nurses.pdf is a key for student Nurses
HIV lecture final - student.pptfghjjkkejjhhge
focused on the development and application of glycoHILIC, pepHILIC, and comm...
OSCE SERIES ( Questions & Answers ) - Set 5.pdf
PEADIATRICS NOTES.docx lecture notes for medical students
Electrolyte Disturbance in Paediatric - Nitthi.pptx
Introduction to Medical Microbiology for 400L Medical Students
Dermatology for member of royalcollege.ppt
The_EHRA_Book_of_Interventional Electrophysiology.pdf
Enteric duplication cyst, etiology and management
OSCE SERIES - Set 7 ( Questions & Answers ).pdf
09. Diabetes in Pregnancy/ gestational.pptx
SEMEN PREPARATION TECHNIGUES FOR INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION.pdf
TISSUE LECTURE (anatomy and physiology )
1. Basic chemist of Biomolecule (1).pptx
Cardiovascular - antihypertensive medical backgrounds
Neonate anatomy and physiology presentation
neurology Member of Royal College of Physicians (MRCP).ppt

High throughput screenig

  • 1. HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING MAHAMMAD SHAKHEEL B PHARMACOLOGY DEPARTMENT
  • 2. •HTS IS A METHOD FOR SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTATION ESPECIALLY USED IN DRUG DISCOVERY AND RELEVANT TO THE FIELDS OF BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY. •DATA PROCESSING, AND CONTROL SOFTWARE, LIQUID HANDLING DEVICES, SENSITIVE DETECTORS- HTS ALLOWS A RESEARCHER TO QUICKLY CONDUCT CHEMICAL, GENETIC AND PHARMACOLOGICAL TESTS. •THE RESULTS OF THESE EXPERIMENTS PROVIDE FOR DRUG DESIGN AND ROLE OF BIOCHEMICAL PROCESS IN BIOLOGY. High throughput screening
  • 3.  Assays for HTS and validation play a key role in drug discovery and development.  Currently, most HTS assays are rely on the use of fluorescent and radioactive labels to messure bichemical reactions or monitor cellular responses.  Lables have adverse effect on binding interaction being investigated leading to false conclusion about binding properties of analyte  Lables also introduce additional complexity and assay develoment time to the procees.
  • 4. Commonly used terms in drug discovery High throughput screen: an optimised, miniaturised assay format that enables the testing of > 100,000 chemically diverse compounds per day. Assay: a test system in which biological activity can be detected Hit: a molecule with confirmed concentration-dependent activity in a screen, and known chemical structure. The output of most screens
  • 5.  Progressible hit: a representative of a compound series with activity via acceptable mechanism of action and some limited structure-activity relationship information  Lead: a compound with potential (as measured by potency, selectivity, physico-chemical properties, absence of toxicity or novelty) to progress to a full drug development programme  Pharmacophore: minimal structure with essential features for activity
  • 6. Drug discovery  Initial characterisation trials  Regulatory approval sought to start trials in humans Pre-clinical  Clinical trials Phases I, II, III  Submission of marketing/manufacturing authorisation application to regulatory authorities or refuse) licences  Product goes on sale  Post-marketing surveillance Regulatory authorities review information and grant ( Library of compounds  In vitro screening: human/animal receptor/enzyme assay; reporter system  Hits/lead  Biochemical, tissue or animal model of function  lead  Animal model of therapeutic target  ADME, formulation, acute toxicology The life history of a successful drug
  • 7. High throughput screening for drug discovery FACT 1: recent understanding of disease mechanisms has dramatically increased no. of protein targets for new drug treatment FACT 2: new technologies have increased the no. of drugs that can be tested for activity at these targets. high throughput screening (HTS) is 1° tool for early-stage drug discovery
  • 8.  HTS is process by which large nos. of compounds are rapidly tested for their ability to modify the properties of a selected biological target.  Goal is to identify ‘hits’ or ‘leads’ - affect target in desired manner - active at fairly low concs (∴ more likely to show specificity) - new structure  The greater the no. and diversity of compounds screened, the more successful screen is likely to be.  HTS = 50,000-100,000 cpds screened per day!!!
  • 9. Goals and limitations of HTS Aim of screening is to find progressible hits, not to discover the lead molecule itself The majority of drug targets are a) G-protein coupled 7 TM receptors b) nuclear receptors c) ion channels d) enzymes progressible hit  targeted synthetic design  Lead
  • 10.  Take top 100 drugs - 18 bind to GPCR - 10 bind to nuclear receptors - 16 bind to ion channels - most of remainder inhibit enzymes  Knowledge gained from one drug target can be transferred to related targets.  e.g molecular technology required to work with 1 GPCR is useful for other GPCRs, including cloning and expression systems and info on structure and ligands.
  • 11. Implementation of HTS Need 4 elements: 1) suitable libraries of compounds Source of chemicals for screen: - in-house collection (5x105 - 106 ) of diverse samples. - supplement by acquisitions from specialist companies -combinatorial chemistry allows synthesis of large no of diverse molecules. 2) assay method configured for automation Assay requirements: a) pharmacology of the target should not be altered by the molecular manipulations
  • 12. b) cost of assay development and reagents low c) easy to use and suitable for automation and miniaturisation. Use multi-well plates: 96, 192, 384, 864, 1536 and assay requiring few manipulations, no plate-o-plate transfers or washing steps d) robust signal-to-noise ratio. Hit defined as activity above a certain threshold e.g. Ki < 5 nM Emax >30% increase over basal e) ideally be non-radioactive  Often express target genes in appropriate host systems e.g. bacterial, yeast, viral, invertebrate and mammalian cells.
  • 13. a) Radioligand binding assays • Measures affinity of library compounds for target. • Need high affinity radioligand that binds to site of interest and cells transfected with target site. • measure competitive displacement of radioligand from target site • Specificity can be assessed by including other possible targets in screen relative affinity for multiple sites PROBLEM: hard to miniaturise radioactive assays (counting takes too long). Alternative is to use fluorescence techniques.
  • 14. b) Cell-based fluorescence and radiotracer assays Useful for measuring ion-channel function e.g.measure movement of Ca2+ in a fluorescent-imaging plate-reader (FLIPR) • cells are loaded with the fluorescent Ca2+ indicator Fluo-3 • depolarisation with high KCl activates Ca2+ channels and allows Ca2+ entry Ca2+ Ca2+ -60 mV fluorescence signal 488 nm Ca2+ Ca2+ -30 mV increased fluorescence 488 nm (a) rest (b) with KCl
  • 15. c) melanophore assays Melanophores = pigmented cells derived from neural crest. Prepare immortalised melanophores from Xenopus laevis Gi melanophores transfection CMV Hß2-AR Plasmid vector AGGREGATED MELANOSOMES  melatonin DISPERSED MELANOSOMES  light Gs, Gq ß agonist ß antagonist
  • 16. d) Reporter gene assays Rather than measure the immediate cellular response, it may be easier to measure the subsequent transcriptional change isoprenaline binding to ß-adrenceptors   cAMP  PKA activation and translocation to nucleus  phosphorylation of transcription factor CREB that recognises cAMP response elements (CREs)   expression of reporter gene whose transcription is driven by an enhancer containing CREs  Measure reporter gene product in HTS format
  • 17. • Examples of reporter genes: ß-galactosidase; luciferase; alkaline phosphatase; green fluorescent protein. • Useful for measuring responses from Gi, Gs or Gq-coupled receptors
  • 18. All screens have danger of false negatives and false positives Not such a problem waste time and resources HTS is less useful for evaluating - bioavailability - pharmackinetics - toxicity - absolute specificity 3) robotics workstation • Robots handle assays in multi-well formats. - sample dilutions - sample dispensing - plate washing
  • 19.  Hard to automate cell lysis or permeabilisation steps (necessary for many 2nd messenger responses). • Full automation allows 24 h continuous operation without requiring shift work. • More efficient and economical. 4) computerised data handling system •A great deal of data is generated. Must be accurate and reproducible. Need good computerised data handling systems.
  • 20. Which strategy is best for hit identification? When a target is identified, a decision has to be made about which chemicals to screen, in order to identify potential lead compounds. Random screening All possible drug molecules screened against target. Estimated no. of possible drug molecules is ± 1040 !!! This is simply not possible.
  • 21.  Focussed screening  A limited number of compounds are pre-selected for screening.  Has proved successful as a hit generation strategy.  Useful when 3D structure of target is known (e.g. crystal structure of a receptor)  - use computer modelling to predict optimal structure to interact with target  - use known ligand to construct 3D pharmacophore  In either case, select compounds from library or design new compounds and screen.  Focussed screening will find novel hits BUT the required information may not be available.
  • 22. Choice of expression system for GPCRs • Ligand binding and transduction properties are effected by cell type, receptor density, and presence of signal transductional elements ADVANTAGES Yeast-based systems e.g. Saccharomyces cerevisiae (also used to express protein tyrosine kinases, peptide hormones and functional ion channels) - grow rapidly - easy and cheap - readily amenable to genetic manipulation - tolerant to solvents used to dissolve drugs e.g.DMSO, methanol Bacterial cells e.g. E.coli - grow rapidly - easy and cheap DISADVANTAGES - May not get functional coupling of transfected GPCRs to yeast G-proteins. Overcome this by coupling GPCRs to yeast pheromone response pathway  agonists promote cell growth or activity of reporter gene construct - may not get proper post-tranlational modification e.g. many GPCRs are not glycosylated in yeast, or cell surface expression. - Low expression levels - Some post-translational modifications not performed - no endogenous G-proteins
  • 23. ADVANTAGES Baculovirus/insect cell system e.g. Sf9 cells - high levels of expression of functional protein - ligand binding properties similar to native receptor - can co-express receptor and mammalian G-proteins - ideal for structural analysis Mammalian cells e.g. CHO, HEK - most authentic background for expression of GPCRs • protein synthesis • membrane insertion • post-translational modification • lipid composition of membranes - receptors usually functional DISADVANTAGES - production of permanent cell lines may be a difficult and lengthy process - can be expensive - receptor promiscuity (different G-proteins activated by 1 receptor  multiple signals) - no. of suitable G-proteins may be limited - GPCR might not be glycosylated - GPCR is occasionally inactive
  • 24. Yeast-based screen and selection for identification of agonists for a human orphan GPCR Yeast ligand Yeast receptor Yeast G protein arrest   human ligand human receptor human G protein growth   (a) In yeast, normal GPCR-initiated pathway results in cell cycle arrest in response to agonist (b) Substitution of human orphan GPCR and human Gα protein yields a strain that only grows if receptor is stimulated Spot individual cpds onto lawn of modified yeast. Detect agonists by growth of yeast on the plate around the site of cpd application
  • 25. orphan receptor peptide growth peptide expression library peptide ligand   (c) alternatively, introduce a random peptide expression library; cells will only grow if the peptide stimulates the receptor
  • 26. REFERENCE  Short protocols in Pharmacology and Drug discovery edited by Enna S J, et al.  Drug discovery and evaluation Pharmacological assy by Vogel H G and Vogel H G.  Modern methods of Drug Discovery by Hillisch, A and Hilgenfeld.