How it All Comes Together
0 likes439 views
MEASURE Evaluation activities in Kenya helped address critical gaps in monitoring and evaluation. This included providing information for programming and policy decisions through surveys and analyses. Capacity strengthening involved trainings and developing frameworks. Tools were tested or used in Kenya to collect data and report on health programs, including forms for health facilities and communities. Lessons showed more coordination is needed nationally and capacity building below the national level.
1 of 8
More Related Content
What's hot (20)
Ad
Viewers also liked (9)
Ad
Similar to How it All Comes Together (20)
More from removed_62798267384a091db5c693ad7f1cc5ac (20)
Recently uploaded (20)
How it All Comes Together
- 1. How it All Comes Together A Case Study of MEASURE Evaluation Activities in Kenya Edward Kunyanga Sam Wambugu
- 2. Critical gaps in M&E in Kenya Information for programming and policy decisions Capacity strengthening in M&E Human Organizational M&E Tools Symposium2008 www.cpc.unc.edu/measure
- 3. Information for programming and policy decisions PEPFAR reporting Mapping Further analyses 1999 Kenya Service Provision Assessment 2003 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 2004 Kenya Service Provision Assessment The Link between HIV/AIDS and Recent Fertility Patterns in Kenya Symposium2008 www.cpc.unc.edu/measure
- 4. Information for programming and policy decisions Public health evaluations Orphans and vulnerable children Targeted Evaluation Abstinence and Be Faithful Targeted Evaluation Palliative Care Targeted Evaluation Verbal autopsy information from demographic surveillance site Symposium2008 www.cpc.unc.edu/measure
- 5. Capacity in M&E Human capacity: Trainings Population Studies and Research Institute/University of Nairobi Organizational development: Community Based Program Activity Reporting (COBPAR) M&E frameworks: NACC, DHR, TB Pushing PEPFAR to support national systems by having USG partners use national reporting forms
- 6. Capacity in M&E Tools tested or used in Kenya: Data quality tools Community Based Reporting-COBPAR form Health Facility Reporting-Form 726 Kenya Performance Monitoring System (KePMS database) Child Status Index (CSI) Information use manual and guides including decision calendar Symposium2008 www.cpc.unc.edu/measure
- 7. Lessons learned Despite unified M&E approach at international level, more needs to be done to improve coordination and collaboration at country level Capacity in M&E at levels below the national level are lacking
- 8. Conclusion Under MEASURE Evaluation II, Kenya has played three roles: Informing M&E tool development Participating in multi-country studies Adapting existing tools
Editor's Notes
- #2: This presentation will help shed some light on how MEASURE Evaluation does it in a country. It will illustrate how different strategies and work in Monitoring and Evaluation comes together at the country level. We will describe some of the main M&E gaps MEASURE Evaluation has helped to address in Kenya, how those gaps were addressed and look at the lessons learned.