SlideShare a Scribd company logo
David Mosher
Biz Performance Solutions, Inc
Companies that aspire to market leadership realize that
innovation is crucial to their business success. In a recent study
of 940 executives by The Boston Consulting Group1, 87 percent
of all respondents agreed that organic growth through
innovation is essential to success in their respective industry. In
addition, three-quarters of these executives said that their
companies’ spending on innovation would increase during the
current fiscal year.

However, the same report also found that 51 percent of the
respondents expressed dissatisfaction with the financial returns
on investment (ROI) they receive from their innovation
initiatives. This anxiety is compounded by additional research
that shows “there is no correlation” between R&D spending and
sales growth, earnings or shareholder returns.2
Analysis by AMR Research suggests that the disconnect
between R&D spend rates and business results stems
from the maturity of the management processes used to
oversee R&D investment.3
As the study indicates, creating ideas and technology is one
thing; leveraging those elements in the market place is another.
At the end of the day, it would appear that “How you
spend is far more important than how much you spend.”4
According to the Product Development
Management Association (PDMA), the ultimate
goal of technology management is:

  To prioritize and focus research and development efforts on
  technology opportunities today that will have a positive effect
  on corporate revenues in the future.5
Looking at new product development processes
holistically, these studies suggest that today’s
increasing demand for faster, better and less expensive
product development requires more effective upfront
planning and a cohesive alignment between strategic
planning, technology planning, product research and
product development. In essence, the alignment and
integration of these functions is the delineating factor
in determining business winners from business losers.
PDMA expands on this conclusion:
  To accomplish their goals, corporations should invest in
  tools, processes and structure that support the identification of
  technological opportunities to fuel product innovation and product-
  to-market excellence.6
To maximize success, companies require
management processes that enable them to
oversee their R&D investments and connect their
R&D spending to real-world business results.
These new product development processes
demand more upfront planning and a close
alignment between the company’s strategic
planning, technology planning, product research
and product development functions.
Research organizations, product development
groups, product managers, marketing managers
and legal organizations are stakeholders in
technology management.
Stakeholde    Why technology management matters
r
Research      Efficient technology planning and management should
managers      and leaders sharply focus research efforts, share knowledge and
and leaders   directly influence downstream product development
              and manufacturing.
Product       Effective technology management should result in management
developmen    standardized technology platforms and increased understanding of the
t             important roles these platforms play in meeting market requirements.
              These improvements provide the product development organization
managemen
              with a clear opportunity to increase quality and reduce development
t             cost.
Product       By mapping technology to specific market requirements
managemen     and marketing and product capabilities, product managers are able to
t and         more clearly outline how product architectures relate
              to customer benefits.
marketing
Legal         Technology management provides the legal organization
              with a relatively simple method for signing and
              witnessing process performance as it relates to
PDMA12 references well known research13 in its definition of
“technology planning.”
   Technology planning is the process of knowledge acquisition, which can be later used in
   the design of new products to meet market needs.

Technology planning enables companies to:
• Align their technology acquisition efforts with business and strategic
goals
• More clearly focus their technology development efforts
• Better understand, leverage and protect their intellectual property
• Better identify general technological advances for current and future
product development
• More effectively utilize technology in product development
processes
• Better understand their core competencies
• Provide their products with a competitive edge
PDMA furthers this discussion by indicating that:
  Technology planning is the process that results in an
  actionable plan to leverage new and existing
  technologies, consistent with business strategies and
  customer needs.
In this context, technology is defined as scientific
know-how that is embodied in
people, plants, patents, laboratories and
equipments.14 In essence, technology represents
the framework that underpins a company’s future
products, as well as the development and
manufacturing processes that support these
products. As a result, it is imperative for
companies to clearly understand what technology
is available to them and how these technologies
can be used to meet the needs of their target
markets.
Acquire knowledge                      Use knowledge

                         Technology
                            base




      Idea base                         Product base




Technology development                Product development
PDMA defines a framework for the technology planning
process that consists of three key areas of input: technology
insight, competitive insight and marketing insight. By
considering        these     three     knowledge        bases
together, companies are able to place their technology
planning process within a broader business context that
helps maximize the company’s business success.
The technology planning process begins with the formation
of a cross-discipline team that best represents the
functional areas crucial for identifying and developing
critical technology. Typically, this team includes key R&D
staff having both technical background and strategic
vision,      their      marketing      counterparts       and
consultants/industry experts.
Technology planning starts with the formation of a
cross-discipline team that will identify what
technology, capabilities and competencies are
required to develop a particular product. As the
planning process proceeds, the team further
defines where these technologies will be applied
and what aspects can be commonized. Then, the
team looks at the competitive landscape to
perform a strengths,weaknesses, opportunities and
threats (SWOT) analysis.
Technology Insights
               Internal technology
                   capabilities
           Industry/supplier direction
                  Patent activity

                 Competitive Insights
                 Product Information
                 Technology direction
                   Consumer habits


   Market Insights
Brand identity/message
    Business plan
   Customer needs
PDMA provides a 10-step process to outline and
articulate a full-fledge technology planning process.
The first four steps in this process describe the
brainstorming techniques required to assess new
ideas from a short-term, medium-term and long-term
technology perspective.

Later steps are taken to ensure that these technology
opportunities are aligned with the company's
strategic objectives – with conceptual product
prototypes and product roadmaps being prepared in
many instances.
Explore
                                                                        technology via
                                                                          technology
                                                                            mining

                                                                                                  Step
        Step 2       Step 3                     Step 5                    Step 8                   10
Ste                               Step 4       Brainstor
                                                            Step 6                       Step 9
        Identify      Align                                              Develop                  Updat
                                  Conduct                     Link                    Update
p1     technolog    categories
                                 competitiv
                                                   m
                                                           opportuni
                                                                         strategie
                                                                                        and       e and
Form        y          with                    technolog                   s and                  publis
                                     e                       ties to                  publish
 Tea   categories   functional                      y                     actions                   h
                                 opportunit                 business                 technolog
  m    – building    product                   opportuni                   with                   busine
                                 y analysis                objectives                  y plan
         blocks       areas                       ties                      CFT                     ss
                                                                                                   plan


                                                                  Step 7
                                  Industry
                                                                  Review
                                 competitiv
                                                               opportunities
                                 e direction
                                                                 with core
                                        Current                   business
                                       technolog               planning team
           Marketing                   y position
          business plan
             brand
   As the accompanying diagram indicates, the initial
    four steps in the PDMA technology planning process
    form the basis for brainstorming about new ideas for
    the short-term, medium-term and long-term
    technological opportunities defined in step 5.
   Once these opportunities are identified, the team
    should review this comprehensive list to ensure their
    fit with the company’s strategic business needs. This
    step provides an initial screen that should extend
    beyond the company’s own internal technologies.
   At this point in the process, the team often outlines
    “philosophical product prototypes” and product
    roadmaps.
Year          2012   2013     2014    2015        2016       2017    2018

Product A     A1              A2                  A3         A4

Product B            B1               B2          B3                 B4



Technologie
s
              Technolog               Technolo
               y alpha                gy alpha’

                          Technolog                      Technolog
                            y beta                       y gamma
   A core business planning team should review, screen and filter
    the shortened opportunity list to establish a prioritized list of short-
    term, medium-term and long-term opportunities. The planning
    team will use this list to focus its energies on a relatively small
    number of go-forward technological strategies.
   Ideally, this focus should be broken down into a series of gated
    due-diligence decisions (technical feasibility studies) that are
    undertaken for each technology strategy.
   With these broader actions in mind, the core planning team can
    then outline the commercialization strategies. Once these
    strategies have been reviewed, they can be published and
    distributed to the wider team, along with appropriate business
    plans.
   An internal advisory team should be established to regularly
    review the initial technology plan (with an semi-annual review
    being the bare minimum).
Creating the Competitive Edge
   Alignment within the business and to the markets
   Technology Roadmap and Markets trends
        Including Competitors’ Roadmaps
    Prioritization and focus
    Planning and execution tracking
        Deliverable tracking and notifications
          Standard templates linking
          Consumable by other processes including Intellectual Property
        Action Plans by role and/or stage in the process
          Dynamic reminders
        Resourcing by Competencies
    ROI Support
        Pro forma and variance reporting
        Real-time analysis
    Supports process effectiveness thru metrics and improvement
     tracking
   Have claim charts prepared if appropriate
   Demonstrate consideration of substitutes
   Provide assignment documents
   Demonstrate clear title (no liens)
   Manufacturability (defect rate)
   Testing and Environment used
   Provide a valuation
   Clearly identifying the document
   Clearly identifying the version of the document
       Missing, incorrect, or out-of-date documents can cost
        dearly in the negotiation and defense of IP
   Timeliness of documentation is key to dating
    when invention was discovered and filings
    made.
1.    Innovation 2005, The Boston Consulting Group
2.    “Money Isn’t Everything”, The Booz Allen Hamilton Global Innovation 1000, Barry
      Jaruzelski, Kevin Dehoff, Raheska Bordia, 2005
3.    Unmanaged R&D Spending is the Leak that Shareholders Want Plugged, Kevin O’Marah,
      Laura Carillo, AMR Research, 2005.
4.    Op. cit., Booz Allen Hamilton
5.    The PDMA Handbook of New Product Development, Kenneth B. Kahn, George Castellion,
      Abbie Griffin, Second Edition, 2005
6.    Ibid.
7.    Op. cit., Unmanaged R&D Spending, AMR Research
8.    Op. cit., PDMA Handbook.
9.    Intellectual Property, Smart Management, A. K. Jain, 1999
10.   The Knowledge Management Handbook, W. Burkowitz, R. Williams, 1999.
11.   The Innovator’s Dilemma, Clayton A. Christenson, 2003.
12.   Op. Cit., PDMA Handbook.
13.   “Developing Effective Technology Strategies”, Steve Bone, Tim Saxson, Research-Technology
      Management, 2000.
14.   Ibid.
15.   New Product Development: Profiting from Innoviation
Linking Strategy to Execution in Internet time
         While driving Profitability
   Degrees in CS and MBA
   Ran 3 PMO’s at business level
   VP, Development, CTO, CIO, CFO, CEO
   Many 1st to market products
   Member of Project Mgmt Society 10+ years
   Member of Product Development Mgmt Assc
   Guest speaker:
     Stanford’s Graduate School of Business
     PMI Annual Convention
   Certified Agile Scrum Master
   Certified Salesforce.com Admin and Developer
Pete Harnack
 Miller Heiman:
       Strategic Selling
       Large Account Management
       Conceptual Selling
   Pragmatic Marketing Training:
       Effective Product Marketing
       Practical Product Management
   Master of Science in Managing in Science and
    Technology,
       Oregon Health Sciences University/Oregon Graduate
        Center
   Certified Document Imaging Architect

More Related Content

PDF
Best Practices for STEM Capstone_07_07_15
PDF
Bioprosperity
PDF
Lecture 2 - Sources of technological change
PDF
Strategic Planning and Budgeting Guidelines for Independent Software Vendors
PDF
Lecture 7 - Sectoral characteristics of technological change
PDF
Wp Poster Innov Impact Prag 23 02 09
PDF
Project success through excellence in procurement and contract management
PDF
Relationship Between IP and a Business Plan
Best Practices for STEM Capstone_07_07_15
Bioprosperity
Lecture 2 - Sources of technological change
Strategic Planning and Budgeting Guidelines for Independent Software Vendors
Lecture 7 - Sectoral characteristics of technological change
Wp Poster Innov Impact Prag 23 02 09
Project success through excellence in procurement and contract management
Relationship Between IP and a Business Plan

Similar to How Value Creator supports Technology Management (20)

PDF
Tech innovation s7_trm
PPT
Technology forecasting
PDF
Managing technology
PPTX
Tcm step 1 technology analysis
PPT
technology entrepreneurship
PPTX
Tcm Workshop 1 Technology analysis
PDF
Enabling Innovation: A Strength In Any Economy
PPTX
GCTT - Final session
PDF
Understanding Technology in Business Networks
PPTX
Can a Nation Create Entrepreneurs Part 2
PDF
Bi Innovation Support Brochure 2011
PDF
Tech innovation s1
PDF
IMT Lecture: Transforming Invention To Innovation
PPT
Dr. Darryl Klassen
PPTX
Tcm step 1 technology analysis
PPTX
Innovation In The Downturn
PDF
Business Innovation Concept
PPT
training of Professor Kent Millington (2)
PDF
Technology Management.pdf
PDF
Technology Scouting
Tech innovation s7_trm
Technology forecasting
Managing technology
Tcm step 1 technology analysis
technology entrepreneurship
Tcm Workshop 1 Technology analysis
Enabling Innovation: A Strength In Any Economy
GCTT - Final session
Understanding Technology in Business Networks
Can a Nation Create Entrepreneurs Part 2
Bi Innovation Support Brochure 2011
Tech innovation s1
IMT Lecture: Transforming Invention To Innovation
Dr. Darryl Klassen
Tcm step 1 technology analysis
Innovation In The Downturn
Business Innovation Concept
training of Professor Kent Millington (2)
Technology Management.pdf
Technology Scouting
Ad

How Value Creator supports Technology Management

  • 2. Companies that aspire to market leadership realize that innovation is crucial to their business success. In a recent study of 940 executives by The Boston Consulting Group1, 87 percent of all respondents agreed that organic growth through innovation is essential to success in their respective industry. In addition, three-quarters of these executives said that their companies’ spending on innovation would increase during the current fiscal year. However, the same report also found that 51 percent of the respondents expressed dissatisfaction with the financial returns on investment (ROI) they receive from their innovation initiatives. This anxiety is compounded by additional research that shows “there is no correlation” between R&D spending and sales growth, earnings or shareholder returns.2
  • 3. Analysis by AMR Research suggests that the disconnect between R&D spend rates and business results stems from the maturity of the management processes used to oversee R&D investment.3 As the study indicates, creating ideas and technology is one thing; leveraging those elements in the market place is another. At the end of the day, it would appear that “How you spend is far more important than how much you spend.”4
  • 4. According to the Product Development Management Association (PDMA), the ultimate goal of technology management is: To prioritize and focus research and development efforts on technology opportunities today that will have a positive effect on corporate revenues in the future.5
  • 5. Looking at new product development processes holistically, these studies suggest that today’s increasing demand for faster, better and less expensive product development requires more effective upfront planning and a cohesive alignment between strategic planning, technology planning, product research and product development. In essence, the alignment and integration of these functions is the delineating factor in determining business winners from business losers. PDMA expands on this conclusion: To accomplish their goals, corporations should invest in tools, processes and structure that support the identification of technological opportunities to fuel product innovation and product- to-market excellence.6
  • 6. To maximize success, companies require management processes that enable them to oversee their R&D investments and connect their R&D spending to real-world business results. These new product development processes demand more upfront planning and a close alignment between the company’s strategic planning, technology planning, product research and product development functions.
  • 7. Research organizations, product development groups, product managers, marketing managers and legal organizations are stakeholders in technology management.
  • 8. Stakeholde Why technology management matters r Research Efficient technology planning and management should managers and leaders sharply focus research efforts, share knowledge and and leaders directly influence downstream product development and manufacturing. Product Effective technology management should result in management developmen standardized technology platforms and increased understanding of the t important roles these platforms play in meeting market requirements. These improvements provide the product development organization managemen with a clear opportunity to increase quality and reduce development t cost. Product By mapping technology to specific market requirements managemen and marketing and product capabilities, product managers are able to t and more clearly outline how product architectures relate to customer benefits. marketing Legal Technology management provides the legal organization with a relatively simple method for signing and witnessing process performance as it relates to
  • 9. PDMA12 references well known research13 in its definition of “technology planning.” Technology planning is the process of knowledge acquisition, which can be later used in the design of new products to meet market needs. Technology planning enables companies to: • Align their technology acquisition efforts with business and strategic goals • More clearly focus their technology development efforts • Better understand, leverage and protect their intellectual property • Better identify general technological advances for current and future product development • More effectively utilize technology in product development processes • Better understand their core competencies • Provide their products with a competitive edge
  • 10. PDMA furthers this discussion by indicating that: Technology planning is the process that results in an actionable plan to leverage new and existing technologies, consistent with business strategies and customer needs.
  • 11. In this context, technology is defined as scientific know-how that is embodied in people, plants, patents, laboratories and equipments.14 In essence, technology represents the framework that underpins a company’s future products, as well as the development and manufacturing processes that support these products. As a result, it is imperative for companies to clearly understand what technology is available to them and how these technologies can be used to meet the needs of their target markets.
  • 12. Acquire knowledge Use knowledge Technology base Idea base Product base Technology development Product development
  • 13. PDMA defines a framework for the technology planning process that consists of three key areas of input: technology insight, competitive insight and marketing insight. By considering these three knowledge bases together, companies are able to place their technology planning process within a broader business context that helps maximize the company’s business success. The technology planning process begins with the formation of a cross-discipline team that best represents the functional areas crucial for identifying and developing critical technology. Typically, this team includes key R&D staff having both technical background and strategic vision, their marketing counterparts and consultants/industry experts.
  • 14. Technology planning starts with the formation of a cross-discipline team that will identify what technology, capabilities and competencies are required to develop a particular product. As the planning process proceeds, the team further defines where these technologies will be applied and what aspects can be commonized. Then, the team looks at the competitive landscape to perform a strengths,weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis.
  • 15. Technology Insights Internal technology capabilities Industry/supplier direction Patent activity Competitive Insights Product Information Technology direction Consumer habits Market Insights Brand identity/message Business plan Customer needs
  • 16. PDMA provides a 10-step process to outline and articulate a full-fledge technology planning process. The first four steps in this process describe the brainstorming techniques required to assess new ideas from a short-term, medium-term and long-term technology perspective. Later steps are taken to ensure that these technology opportunities are aligned with the company's strategic objectives – with conceptual product prototypes and product roadmaps being prepared in many instances.
  • 17. Explore technology via technology mining Step Step 2 Step 3 Step 5 Step 8 10 Ste Step 4 Brainstor Step 6 Step 9 Identify Align Develop Updat Conduct Link Update p1 technolog categories competitiv m opportuni strategie and e and Form y with technolog s and publis e ties to publish Tea categories functional y actions h opportunit business technolog m – building product opportuni with busine y analysis objectives y plan blocks areas ties CFT ss plan Step 7 Industry Review competitiv opportunities e direction with core Current business technolog planning team Marketing y position business plan brand
  • 18. As the accompanying diagram indicates, the initial four steps in the PDMA technology planning process form the basis for brainstorming about new ideas for the short-term, medium-term and long-term technological opportunities defined in step 5.  Once these opportunities are identified, the team should review this comprehensive list to ensure their fit with the company’s strategic business needs. This step provides an initial screen that should extend beyond the company’s own internal technologies.  At this point in the process, the team often outlines “philosophical product prototypes” and product roadmaps.
  • 19. Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Product A A1 A2 A3 A4 Product B B1 B2 B3 B4 Technologie s Technolog Technolo y alpha gy alpha’ Technolog Technolog y beta y gamma
  • 20. A core business planning team should review, screen and filter the shortened opportunity list to establish a prioritized list of short- term, medium-term and long-term opportunities. The planning team will use this list to focus its energies on a relatively small number of go-forward technological strategies.  Ideally, this focus should be broken down into a series of gated due-diligence decisions (technical feasibility studies) that are undertaken for each technology strategy.  With these broader actions in mind, the core planning team can then outline the commercialization strategies. Once these strategies have been reviewed, they can be published and distributed to the wider team, along with appropriate business plans.  An internal advisory team should be established to regularly review the initial technology plan (with an semi-annual review being the bare minimum).
  • 21. Creating the Competitive Edge  Alignment within the business and to the markets  Technology Roadmap and Markets trends  Including Competitors’ Roadmaps  Prioritization and focus  Planning and execution tracking  Deliverable tracking and notifications  Standard templates linking  Consumable by other processes including Intellectual Property  Action Plans by role and/or stage in the process  Dynamic reminders  Resourcing by Competencies  ROI Support  Pro forma and variance reporting  Real-time analysis  Supports process effectiveness thru metrics and improvement tracking
  • 22. Have claim charts prepared if appropriate  Demonstrate consideration of substitutes  Provide assignment documents  Demonstrate clear title (no liens)  Manufacturability (defect rate)  Testing and Environment used  Provide a valuation
  • 23. Clearly identifying the document  Clearly identifying the version of the document  Missing, incorrect, or out-of-date documents can cost dearly in the negotiation and defense of IP  Timeliness of documentation is key to dating when invention was discovered and filings made.
  • 24. 1. Innovation 2005, The Boston Consulting Group 2. “Money Isn’t Everything”, The Booz Allen Hamilton Global Innovation 1000, Barry Jaruzelski, Kevin Dehoff, Raheska Bordia, 2005 3. Unmanaged R&D Spending is the Leak that Shareholders Want Plugged, Kevin O’Marah, Laura Carillo, AMR Research, 2005. 4. Op. cit., Booz Allen Hamilton 5. The PDMA Handbook of New Product Development, Kenneth B. Kahn, George Castellion, Abbie Griffin, Second Edition, 2005 6. Ibid. 7. Op. cit., Unmanaged R&D Spending, AMR Research 8. Op. cit., PDMA Handbook. 9. Intellectual Property, Smart Management, A. K. Jain, 1999 10. The Knowledge Management Handbook, W. Burkowitz, R. Williams, 1999. 11. The Innovator’s Dilemma, Clayton A. Christenson, 2003. 12. Op. Cit., PDMA Handbook. 13. “Developing Effective Technology Strategies”, Steve Bone, Tim Saxson, Research-Technology Management, 2000. 14. Ibid. 15. New Product Development: Profiting from Innoviation
  • 25. Linking Strategy to Execution in Internet time While driving Profitability
  • 26. Degrees in CS and MBA  Ran 3 PMO’s at business level  VP, Development, CTO, CIO, CFO, CEO  Many 1st to market products  Member of Project Mgmt Society 10+ years  Member of Product Development Mgmt Assc  Guest speaker:  Stanford’s Graduate School of Business  PMI Annual Convention  Certified Agile Scrum Master  Certified Salesforce.com Admin and Developer
  • 27. Pete Harnack  Miller Heiman:  Strategic Selling  Large Account Management  Conceptual Selling  Pragmatic Marketing Training:  Effective Product Marketing  Practical Product Management  Master of Science in Managing in Science and Technology,  Oregon Health Sciences University/Oregon Graduate Center  Certified Document Imaging Architect