Compendium of Inspiring Practices: sample of an on-going, larger and open initiative to document inspirational and international experiences on Urban and Territorial Planning that illustrates the Guidelines….

INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES ON
URBAN AND TERRITORIAL PLANNING
Towards a Compendium of Inspiring Practices

ACKOWLEDGEMENTS
April 2015
United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat)
P. O. Box 30030, 00100 Nairobi GPO KENYA
Tel: 254-020-7623120 (Central Office)
www.unhabitat.org
Coordinators: Remy Sietchiping, Raf Tuts
Task Manager: Kamel Bouhmad
Authors: Luc Aldon, Serge Allou, Sahar Attia, Brigitte Bariol-Mathais, Kathryn Bryk Friedman, Wayne J. Caldwell,
Ronald Chimowa, Irena F. Creed, Alexis Doucet, Michael Elliott, Imam Ernawi, Rose-May Guignard, Sara Hoeflich,
Alexey Kozmin, Yvonne Lynch, Josep Maria Llop, Marianne Malez, Mohamed El Mati, Hilde Moe, André Mueller,
Shi Nan, Shipra Narang Suri, Toshiyasu Noda, Anne Pons, Elke Pahl-Weber, Hassan Radoine, Virginie Rachmuhl,
Maria Regina Rau de Souza, Jori Scheers, Rashid Seedat, Elkin Velasquez, Honyang Wang
Contributors and Reviewers: Daniel Biau, Kamel Bouhmad, Thamara Fortes, Flávio Gonzaga Bellegarde Nunes,
Paulius Kulikauskas, Christine Platt, Remy Sietchiping, Rebecca Sinclair, Bruce Stiftel, Javier Torner, Raf Tuts
Design and Layout: Thamara Fortes
Financial and Technical Support: Government of France, Government of Japan and Swedish International
Development Cooperation Agency
Front cover photos (top, bottom right and left): Tbilisi, Georgia © Flickr/miss_rubov
Sendai, Japan © Flickr/Luiz Rodriguez
Douala, Cameroon © Flickr/The Advocacy Project
Table of contents photo: Focus group discussion in China © Flickr/Sistak
26 Case Studies cover photos
(top, bottom right and left): Melbourne, Australia © Flickr/Sam Gao
Ahmedabad BRT, India © Flickr/Meena Kadri
Medellin, Colombia © Flickr/Squiggle
Annexes cover photos
(top, bottom right and left): Portland, USA © Flickr/Jeff Gunn
Sorsogon, Philippines © Flickr/Andy Nelson
Warwick Junction, Durban, South Africa © Caroline Skinner
In memory of Dr. Mohamed El Mati (1951-2014), member of the Ad-Hoc Expert Group

iInternational Guidelines on Urban and Territorial Planning
SUMMARY ii
INTRODUCTION 1
Rationale and Purpose 1
Scope and Methodology 1
Structure and Format 2
The Way Forward 2
KEY LESSONS LEARNT 3
Integrated Policy Formulation and Implementation 3
Transformative Renewal Strategies 4
Environment Planning and Management 5
Planning Compact and Connected Cities and Regions 5
Inclusive and Participatory Planning 6
SAMPLE OF 26 CASE STUDIES 7
Argentina, Santa Fe and Mozambique, Niassa/Lichinga – Harnessing the Potential of Intermediary Cities through Base
Plan Methodology 8
Australia, Melbourne – Turning a Great City Green 9
Belgium, Ghent – The Port Area – Converting a Polluting Port into a Socio-Economic Hub 10
Brazil, Porto Alegre – Unlocking Development Potential with People Participation 11
Burkina Faso, Ouagadougou and Cameroon, Douala – The Power of a Collective Vision 12
Canada, Greater Toronto Area – Long Term Food Security through Progressive Planning 13
China, Shenzhen – From Fishing Village to Economic Powerhouse 14
China, Yangtze River Delta – The Transformative Power of Integrated Regional Planning 15
Colombia, Medellin – Reshaping Medellin through Social Urbanism 16
Egypt, Greater Cairo Region – The Renegeration of a Brownfield that Achieves Inclusion and Connectivity 17
Europe, Leipzig Charter – Supra-National Coordination for Universal Sustainability 18
France, Lyon – Metropolitan Planning Towards Inclusion and Quality of Life 19
France and Germany, Strasbourg-Kehl – A Cross-Border Urban Project to Deliver Local Development 20
Germany, The Rhine-Ruhr Metropolitan Area – Breathing New Life into Post-Industrial Cities 21
Haiti, Port-au-Prince – The Value of Planning in a Post-Disaster Situation 22
India, Ahmedabad – Connectivity, Integration and Inclusion through Transport 23
Indonesia, Surabaya – Championing Green Community Development 24
Japan, Fukuoka – Compact Principles for Quality of Life 25
Morocco – Relieving Urban Pressures through New Towns and City Extensions 26
Norway – Cities of the Future Characterised by Climate Change Adaptation 27
Russia, Siberian Federal District, Krasnoyarsk – Building an International City through a New Urban Planning Paradigm 28
Russia, Yekaterinburg – Mitigating Competing Interests through Urban Reform 29
South Africa, Gauteng City Region – City-Regional Integration for Success 30
United States of America, Chattanooga – Restoring Prosperity through Planning 31
United States of America and Canada, The Great Lakes St. Lawrence River Region – Innovative Responses to
Trans-Boundary Challenges 32
Zimbabwe, Mozambique and South Africa – Sengwe-Tshipise Wilderness Corridor – Community Collaboration on
Cross Border Environmental Protection 33
ANNEXES 34
Annex 1: Leaflet presenting the IG-UTP Initiative 35
Annex 2: Fukuoka Communiqué 39
Annex 3: Current list of draft Case Studies 40
Annex 4: List of members of the Ad-Hoc Expert Group 41
Table of contents

ii Information Document - Towards a Compendium Of Inspiring Practices
Summary
UN-Habitat has supported, in accordance with
the Resolution 24/3 of its Governing Council, the
elaboration of “International Guidelines of Urban and
Territorial Planning” (see leaflet in Annex 1) through
an Ad-hoc Expert Group that was established to
advise on the structure, content and wording of the
proposed Guidelines (see list of experts in Annex 4).
The Expert Group gathered three times since the last
Governing Council in April 2013 to carefully review
the Guidelines and the set of illustrative case studies.
This consultative and inclusive process has culminated
in an agreed draft of the Guidelines that was
submitted for consideration to the 25th session of UN-
Habitat Governing Council (see Fukuoka Communiqué
in Annex 2).
The Information Document is an extract from the
prospective Compendium of Inspiring Practices, a
database that is being developed to support and
illustrate the Guidelines (see current list of draft case
studies in Annex 3). The Information Document
comprises a sample of 26 international experiences
in urban and territorial planning that have been
developed by the Expert Group and its associated
networks.
It provides a cross section of inventive, ambitious and
unique cases that address common issues of urban
and territorial development and highlights successful
examples of how urban and territorial planning can re-
shape countries and regions towards more sustainable
development.
The case studies also demonstrate the importance
of the key planning principles promoted in the
Guidelines. Each local example embodies the four
main pillars of urban and territorial planning, by using
progressive policies and governance, integrating
spatial strategies with wider development goals, and
delivering coordinated implementation to positively
influence the economic, social and environmental
dimensions of cities and regions.
The document has four main parts. The first section
covers the elements of context, scope, methodology
and structure of the document. The second section
summarizes the key lessons learnt from the case
studies and suggests a way forward. The third
section is a sample of 26 summarized case studies
alphabetically ordered by country. The fourth and last
section includes a set of annexes with reference and
supporting documents.
Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso © Wikipedia/United Nations Places

1International Guidelines on Urban and Territorial Planning
INTRODUCTION
Rationale and Purpose Scope and Methodology
Resolution 24/3 of UN-Habitat Governing Council
requests the Executive Director of UN-Habitat, in
consultation with the Committee of Permanent
Representatives:
• “to initiate the elaboration of international
guidelines on urban and territorial planning
that will provide a global framework for improving
policies, plans and designs for more compact,
socially inclusive, sustainable, better integrated
and connected cities and territories and to present
the draft guidelines to the Governing Council at
its twenty-fifth session for approval. (OP4)”;
• “in the drafting of international guidelines on
urban and territorial planning to engage in
an inclusive consultative process with the
regional offices of the UN-Habitat, national
Governments, international associations of
local authorities, including United Cities and
Local Governments, all relevant United Nations
organizations, international finance institutions,
development agencies, relevant international
professional associations and members of
the Habitat Professional Forum, including the
International Society of City and Regional Planners
and non-governmental organizations, and other
national and international stakeholders, in order
to inform the drafting process with best practices
and lessons learned from different contexts and at
different scales. (OP8)”
The Compendium of Inspiring Practices illustrates
the conditions and benefits of the key principles
included in the Guidelines while providing relevant
facts and figures and concrete evidence of the impacts
of sound urban and territorial planning.
The case studies have been drafted by international
experts who have been nominated by member states
as well as international professional organizations
and associations. This Compendium forms a
sample of an ongoing, larger and open initiative
to document inspirational and international
experiences at a range of geographical scales.
The current list of the 46 draft case studies that have
been submitted so far by the experts is presented in
Annex 3. The case studies include interventions at
the supra-national, national, metropolitan, city and
neighbourhood scales from Africa, America, Asia,
Oceania and Europe.
Further, guiding criteria were established to guide the
drafting of the case studies such as: a provision of
concrete impacts from urban and territorial planning,
historical perspective to enable assessing results
and impacts, illustrations of integrated planning
approaches and demonstration of the benefits of
the key principles included in the Guidelines. Finally,
experiences were required to be geographically
balanced by regions and thematically linked to
the qualifiers included in the resolution 24/3 of
creating more compact, socially inclusive, better
integrated and connected cities that are resilient
to climate change.
Emscher Landscape Park Rhine-Ruhr, Germany © Flickr/dysturb.net

2 Information Document - Towards a Compendium Of Inspiring Practices
Structure and Format The Way Forward
The 26 case studies are alphabetically ordered by
country and mention the name and institution
of the authors. The narratives are short (less than
550 words) and provide a snapshot of each inspiring
practice. The structure of each case begins with the
context indicating why a planning intervention was
required. The process of the planning practice follows,
specifically its formulation and implementation, with
detail of the relevant parties involved, the decision
making process and the policies, plans and strategies
used. The final paragraph investigates the results and
impacts of the planning practice, highlighting notable
achievements and addressing any shortcomings which
may have been identified in the process.
The Compendium of Inspiring Practices forms
the start of a global network of knowledge
and experience sharing. Such a platform would
enable decision makers to make more informed
decisions on their own development challenges.
The 26 case studies presented in this Compendium
may initiate a larger body of work, with a call for
further contributions of inspiring urban and territorial
planning practices. This growing collection may be
organized into an open online database of experiences
related to key development themes and to the
principles of the Guidelines, and a publication of a
series of handbooks. Such tools can provide inspiration
for policy makers, planners and communities to
promote sustainable urban and territorial development
in future planning processes.
Once the Guidelines are approved, UN-Habitat may
be called upon to support regions, countries and
cities which would consider using the Guidelines in
their specific contexts. The Compendium of Inspiring
Practices along with the Guidelines are intended to
be a source of inspiration when reviewing urban and
territorial planning frameworks. It is also expected that
the Guidelines substantively inform and contribute
to the preparatory processes of third United Nations
Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban
Development (Habitat III) and other global agendas
such as the Post-2015 Development Agenda and the
21th session of the Conference of Parties (COP21).
Shenzhen, China © Flickr/G P

KEY LESSONS LEARNT
Across such a wide cross section of case studies
documenting planning experiences in various contexts,
the outcomes and lessons learnt are numerous and
diverse. Five key lessons can be underscored in
the case studies, which showcase how sustainable
urban and territorial development can be triggered
through (1) integrated policy formulation and
implementation, (2) transformative renewal
strategies, (3) environment planning and
management, (4) planning compact and
connected cities and regions, and (5) inclusive and
participatory planning. The key lessons drawn from
the case studies can be applied at local, sub-national,
national or even supra-national levels, reflecting
the multi-scale continuum of urban planning and
development.
Integrated Policy Formulation and
Implementation
Implementing urban policies and plans is an effective
means of improving and strengthening urban
governance systems with the view to achieve balanced
social and economic development. To make policy
interventions effective there needs to be a long term
trajectory, which embraces the current and future
needs of an area. The use of vertical and horizontal
policy integration has proved vital in shaping the
spatial development of any territory, in guiding future
growth, influencing behaviour and actions at political
level and providing strategic direction through a
shared vision for development.
The power of forward thinking policy that has
achieved significant economic growth is embodied by
China in the cases of the Yangtze River Delta and
Shenzhen, regional areas that have become major
economic powerhouses of China. Through being
established as a strategic Special Economic Zone (SEZ),
Shenzhen has swelled from a small fishing village to
a modern day megacity. Effective master planning
has ensured that development has been regionally
balanced, with all areas well serviced by infrastructure,
access to jobs and green open spaces.
Similarly, balanced regional and economic
development has been instilled in city, regional and
supranational development policies by Morocco,
Gauteng, South Africa and the European Union
respectively. Each uses spatial planning and sectorial
cooperation to mitigate social segregation and slum
conditions, while delivering increased economic
outputs through better accessibility and productivity.
This was epitomized in the Gauteng City Region,
which used a progressive development policy to
integrate developmental goals at horizontal and
vertical institutional levels.
Using urban and territorial planning policies to
improve disaster management and mitigate climate
change risks was effective in both Port au Prince,
Haiti and Norway, where integration of the public,
private and the NGO sectors assisted in strengthening
the resilience of the cities. In the case of Norway,
mobilizing multiple stakeholders in support of forward
thinking urban and environmental policy helped
improve the country’s preparedness by standardizing
expectations on climate action and adaptation.
Rabat, Morocco © Flickr/Christopher Rose

Transformative Renewal Strategies
Urban decline is driven by a culmination of economic,
social and environmental struggles that lead to
population decline or social instability in the area.
Urban and territorial planning has the powerful
ability to deliver reform through long term planning
strategies punctuated by area based projects. Urban
renewal, with a view of stimulating economic growth,
restoration of the social fabric and improvement of
the natural environment, is a proactive means of
spatially responding to a changing local and global
environment. Instrumental in achieving this are strong
and progressive governance structures, which use
innovative approaches to respond to complex urban
challenges.
The use of urban and territorial planning strategies to
combat social exclusion was successful in the cases
of Lyon, France and Medellin, Colombia, who
successfully integrated previously ostracized areas to
restore social cohesion. This was achieved through
urban master plans and strategies that created a
connection between different parts of the city and
provided public spaces that encouraged inclusion
and participation. Medellin is a prime case where
reforming local approaches to urban development
had an indirect but powerful impact on the homicide
and crime rates on the city, subsequently improving
economic growth. This can be credited to the
successful integration of previously crime ridden
neighbourhoods in the city, by using small scale urban
development projects to make civic spaces more
welcoming and socially integrated.
Renewal opportunities are prevalent in cities or regions
which have seen a shift in industry, experiencing rapid
economic decline, often accompanied by a degraded
and polluted natural landscape. This was the case for
Chattanooga, United States of America, Rhine-
Ruhr, Germany and Krasnoyarsk, Russia, who used
their degrading city cores as an impetus to elaborate
master plans, envisioning a long term and adaptive
renewal strategy. Rhine-Ruhr is a unique example,
which reimagined itself from an industrial wasteland
to a green landscape park that attracts thousands of
visitors per year and has become a national model of
urban and territorial planning.
Using spatial interventions to stimulate economic
regeneration is not limited to former industrial cities.
The city of Strasbourg, France identified its border
region as an underused and impractical site due to the
lack of integration across the trans-boundary region
with Kehl, Germany. The innovative response of the
two mayors was to proactively integrate the region
through trans-boundary urban development projects.
Together, they reformed their governance structures to
facilitate urban development projects, stimulating the
economic and human flows between the two areas,
driving the supra-national region to a competitive
position within the European Union.
Biblioteca Santo Domingo Savio, Medellin, Colombia © Flickr/ATOM arquitectura

Environment Planning and Management Planning Compact, Integrated and
Connected Cities and Regions
The natural environment has become a fundamental
component of planning and policy making. Thanks
to the current awareness of climate change and the
corresponding risks, the threat of natural disaster and
the need to provide sufficient resources to sustain
a growing population, integration of the natural
environment into urban and territorial planning policy
and processes is now seen as essential in developing
resilient cities. This is of importance at all scales of
urban and territorial planning, particularly considering
trans-boundary resources and situations where the
number of stakeholders are amplified.
The integration of climate adaptation and natural
resource management has been exemplified in the
Melbourne, Australia and Toronto, Canada case
studies, where urban design and land use processes
have seamlessly incorporated the environment,
providing a sustainable future vision for the respective
cities. In Melbourne, the City Council responded
to harsh drought conditions and a declining natural
urban environment by developing an ecosystem-
based climate adaptation programme that was
integrated into urban palnning. In doing so, the city
has harnessed opportunities in the development
process, such as water sensitive urban design, while
also countering the negative impacts of development,
demonstrated by their Urban Forest Strategy.
Trans-boundary regions are increasingly being
considered under supra-national planning polices, as
is the case for the Great Lakes Region bordering
Canada and the United States of America, and
the Sengwe-Tshipise Wilderness Corridor crossing
Zimbabwe, Mozambique and South Africa.
The importance of incorporating blue, green and
biodiversity corridors into planning strategies is
essential in natural resource management and uniting
key stakeholders. The Great Lakes Region used the
technique of scenario analysis to build consensus
across diverse stakeholders and secure the future of
the shared resource.
Compact and connected cities and regions are
fundamentally more productive and less taxing on
the environment than sprawling, disconnected cities
and regions. Coordinating urban and territorial
planning strategies with sectorial interventions is vital
in this regard. Such development leads to increased
job opportunities for citizens and fosters a socially
inclusive urban environment.
The importance of compact planning in influencing
infrastructure development and supporting a well-
connected city is demonstrated in Ahmedabad, India
and Fukuoka, Japan. The latter has been praised
for adopting a ‘Compact City Model’. Using city
development frameworks to entrench the compact
and connected principle in its design has reaped long
term benefits in economic development, quality of life
and environmental improvements.
The Imbaba Project in the Greater Cairo Region
that seeks to regenerate the airport area to provide
transportation, services and housing is an excellent
example of compact city principles in action. Using
renewal sites to achieve compact development
strengthens existing cores and transport corridors,
economizing on existing urban structures while
creating a more integrated municipal area.
The value of graphics and mapping to highlight the
integration of cities is embodied by the basic plan
approach of Lichinga, Mozambique and Santa
Fe, Argentina, as well as by the Rules of Land Use
Development in Yekaterinburg Russia. Using graphic
representations of current realities helped, in the
case of Yekaterinburg to better integrate contrasting
functions through identifying intensity of use of
infrastructure, an important element to achieving
sustainable economic development and quality of life.

Information Document - Towards a Compendium Of Inspiring Practices6
Inclusive and Participatory Planning
The value placed on participation is prevalent
throughout the case studies, showing the benefit
gained by involving people and communities for
better social, cultural and urban outcomes. Significant
improvements in implementation were noted when
citizens were consulted, or in some instances granted
power to actively contribute to urban and territorial
policies and strategies. This was particularly powerful
for ensuring basic human rights deserved by all, as
well as responding to the complex issues of gender
equality and youth inclusion in urban environments
Incorporating people in the urban planning and
implementation process delivered improved urban
outcomes in many instances, including in Surabaya,
Indonesia and Ghent, Belgium. Equally, the
City Development Strategy (CDS) employed by
Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso and Douala,
Cameroon constitutes an impressive example of
how city development initiatives can be strengthened
through an inclusive and participatory approach.
Encouraging citizens and stakeholders to invest
in a city strategy through ongoing advocacy and
open dialogues was a key driver in uniting the
city to achieve balanced urban development and
human rights. Consensus and cooperation in
establishing and acting on the CDS contributed to
increased institutional confidence and new financing
opportunities.
An excellent example of well managed and
meaningful public participation was evident in the
participatory budgeting strategy of Porto Alegre,
Brazil. By providing an outlet for citizens to contribute
to policy making, improved and targeted responses
to urban challenges has been achieved in the areas
of access to health, education, water and sanitation
services. The process has strengthened communities
overall, with a particular emphasis on marginalized
segments of the society who have been able to voice
their concerns on urban and social issues.
Porto Alegre, Brazil © Flickr/Editorial J

Santa Fé is a culturally diverse and resource rich
province located in Argentina with a population of
3.3 million. It holds few obvious resemblances to the
Niassa Province in Mozambique, an agricultural and
natural resource rich region with approximately 1.2
million residents. Both, however, include intermediary
cities, such as Lichinga, that differ in nature but
function as an interface and mediator for the larger
surrounding cities and rural terrtitories. Historically,
they lack the controlled urbanization processes that
are afforded to larger cities, yet due to their integral
role in the urban network and strong population base,
should be considered equally if not more for future
growth and development opportunities. Lichinga and
Santa Fé have both experienced strong population
growth yet lack a sound urban structure, resulting in
uneven development, spatial and social segregation
and inappropriate basic services.
To maximize their local urban potential, Lichinga
city and five pilot cities in Santa Fé partnered with
the United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG) to
develop and implement their own Base Plan. Basic
Plannig is a guideline for the urban planning of
intermediary cities, incorporating flexible strategies
to strengthen the management capacities of local
governments and provide an entry point for further
integrated physical and strategic planning. As a
document, it simply provides a graphic representation
of the varying physical components that make up the
urban area or territory to provide an overview of the
development challenges and opportunities of the area.
Argentina, Santa Fé and Mozambique, Niassa/Lichinga
Harnessing the Potential of Intermediary Cities through Basic Plan Methodology
Authors: Josep Llop Maria, UNESCO Chair - Intermediary Cities, Lleida University, and Network UIA-CIMES, Spain
Sara Hoeflich,World Secretariat, United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG)
SantaFé,Argentina©Flickr/FacuFernández
To formulate the Base Plan, relevant local data is
collected to form a current profile of the city, forming
a base of information that has sometimes never been
collected before. From here, members of both the
provincial and local governments and members of the
community convene to form a local technical team,
who will discuss the methodology of the Basic Plan
process, resulting in seminars and peer workshops
to share information and discuss the components of
the plan and prospects for future urban strategies.
Once the Base Plan is formulated it is presented to
the local community to raise awareness of the urban
challenges and to allow for the local community to
make a collective decision on the prioritization of
future projects.
The impact of the Base Plan is immeasurable on
intermediary cities, which have often not employed
urban and territorial planning processes in the past.
It has responded to a distinct shortage of technical
tools for the planning of intermediary cities, assisting
the sustainable urban development for the over 60%
of the global urban population that occupy them.
The simplicity and ease of the Base Plans formulation
and implementation has resulted in the increased
uptake from five pilot towns in Santa Fé to over
thirteen towns across the province. The Base Plan
opens the door to a plethora of other urban planning
and development projects that can help with the
sustainable development of an area. Most importantly,
it strengthens the capacity, knowledge and interest of
local governments and place sustainable urban and
territorial development as a priority on the agenda.

International Guidelines on Urban and Territorial Planning 9
Australia, Melbourne
Turning a Great City Green
Author: Yvonne Lynch,Team Leader, Urban Forest & Ecology, Urban
Landscapes, City of Melbourne,Australia
Melbourne,Australia©Flickr/Jes
Melbourne is the capital of Victoria, the southern-
most mainland state of Australia, and includes 31
Local Government areas totalling over 4.14 million
people. The City of Melbourne itself is a rapidly
growing municipality, with over 100,000 residents,
which increases to over 800,000 each day as people
enter the city centre to work, visit and play. In recent
years, Melbourne has experienced extreme climate
conditions from record-breaking low rainfalls to
extreme heat events. Rising temperatures in Australia
are now expected to outpace global warming
worldwide. This poses major challenges for Australia
and also for Melbourne. In 2009, 374 people died
across metropolitan Melbourne in one heatwave.
By 2009, the city’s urban rainforest, an invaluable
environmental asset, was in a state of unprecedented
decline due to thirteen years of drought in tandem
with severe water restrictions. It was estimated that
23% of the City’s current tree population would be
lost by 2020 and 39% by 2030 as a result of drought.
To respond to this threat, City of Melbourne developed
a new approach to urban planning, through an
ecosystem-based climate adaptation programme,
embracing what the City refers to as ‘nature sensitive’
urban design and planning. This approach emphasises
the services that nature provides to the city and
focuses on how it can be protected, restored, created,
enhanced and maintained within the urban setting.
The urgency posed by the current impacts of climate
changes resulted in the City creating a multi-million
dollar integrated ecosystem-based climate change
adaptation program in 2010 – the ‘Urban Landscapes
Adaptation Program’.
The primary goal of this programme was to reduce
drought vulnerability and to cool the city by 4°C in
an effort to safeguard its citizens and the ecosystem
services of its environmental assets from the impacts
of climate change. The programme is underpinned by
two strategies: the Open Space Strategy, which aims
to increase green space by 7.6% and the Urban Forest
Strategy, which is projected to double the City’s tree
canopy to 40%.
The Urban Landscapes Adaptation Program has
already led to the planting of over 12,000 new trees
and the addition of new green spaces throughout the
city. Over 40 inner-city streets have been retrofitted
to increase permeability and introduce raingardens,
swales and water sensitive tree pits. A stormwater
harvesting network is also being developed, which
is already delivering 25% of annual landscape water
requirements and is reducing reliance on potable
water. As part of plans to double the urban forest
canopy, the City ran a four-year citizen engagement
programme to develop public awareness about the
impacts of climate change and to co-design 10-year
implementation plans. These plans detail how the
urban forest strategy will be implemented in each
precinct, they define the vision for each precinct, the
desired future character and the priority locations for
budget allocations and for work to be undertaken.
The overall benefits that are expected to result from
the City’s continuing work are numerous including
increased climate resilience, improved air quality,
reduced energy demand and associated costs,
increased liveability of the city, reduced heat-related
illness and morbidity, increased thermal comfort and
recreational space for citizens, and improved visual
amenity of the public realm.

Belgium, Ghent
The Port Area – Converting a Polluting Port into a Socio-Economic Hub
Author: Joris Scheers, Project Manager Sustainable Cities, Flanders Government, Belgium
Ghent,Belgium©Flickr/JakobHürner
Ghent is a city located in the Flemish Region of
Belgium, and the capital of the East Flanders province.
The city began as a settlement in the confluence
of the Rivers Leie and Scheldt and its port soon
became one of the most relevant commercial hubs of
Europe. Today, the Ghent Port Area is an important
logistic, industrial and residential area, with housing
developments and small villages scattered around
the Port Area. Through port activities, the port area
population grew to 30,000 local inhabitants, as more
than 300 companies provide approximately 65,000
jobs. In the early 1990s, local residents faced the
increasingly negative effects of surrounding industrial
sites, including car and steel manufacturing, coal
terminals and warehouses. The piecemeal historical
development of these different human activities
gradually degraded the spatial structure of the area,
leaving an uncoordinated urban environment that was
generating widespread environmental problems.
In 1993, leading policy officials started the integrated
Ghent Port Area Project. The main objective was
to tune different government levels and sectorial
policies towards an integrated spatial, environmental
and economic development of the area. A group of
spatial planners and officials was constituted by the
regional government in order to explore the different
issues at stake, screen for relevant actors and listen to
their main concerns and interests. This resulted in the
development of a strategic spatial concept, delivering
a coherent and common vision for the port.
A steering committee was put in place, composed
of leading politicians and civil servants from different
governments (local, regional, and national) and
the Ghent Port authority to guide the development
process. Several small and medium sized private and
public projects were implemented to address the
environmental and living quality in the residential
areas. A number of strategically chosen mobility
problems were also tackled by regional mobility
authorities. For the last two decades the spatial
development process has been based on a three tier
methodology; delivering a coherent and sustainable
long term spatial vision; the development and
application of concrete instruments (e.g. development
plans, environmental subsidies and creation of funds);
and an effective on-the-field implementation based on
budgeted projects.
The Ghent Port Area Project has been acknowledged
as an example of integrative regional development,
receiving the 2009 European award for the social
integration of ports. Integral to its success was the
projects transparency, providing stability and the
opportunity for locally grown operational project
management structures. This method has also led to
the creation of tailor made institutional solutions to
address specific processes, such as housing relocation
inside the port area. Furthermore, the diverse member
composition of the steering committee ensured social
inclusion and prioritization of projects that were
beneficial to the majority of the society.

Brazil, Porto Alegre
Unlocking Development Potential with People Participation
Author: Maria Regina Rau de Souza,
Prefeitura de Porto Alegre, Secretaria da
Fazenda,Assessora, Brazil
PortoAlegre,Brazil©PrefeituradePortoAlegre
Porto Alegre is the administrative capital and largest
city of the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul.
The city has a population of 1.5 million inhabitants
and is considered one of the cultural, political and
economic centers of the country. Over past decades,
the municipal administration has been faced with
the challenge of population growth, struggling to
find structural solutions and funding to address the
growing issues associated with urbanisation.
The first Participatory Budgeting (PB) process was
developed in Porto Alegre in 1989, as a part of
innovative reform programme to address community
participation in the decision making process as a
benchmark of political change. inequality PB is a
dynamic process in which community members, by
means of its representatives, have the right to decide
how to allocate public resources, to be executed in
works and services by municipal administration. The
yearly performance of PB cycles is characterized by
three phases: preparatory meetings, a 17 regional
and 6 thematic meeting round, and a municipal
general meeting. During preparatory meetings the
administration delivers accountability and transparency
related to last performance, and presents the
Investment Plan for the next year.
Different municipal departments attend these
meetings, clarifying process criteria and demand
feasibility. At the regional and thematic meetings the
population elects priorities, counsellors and define the
number of city delegates to form specific forums and
group discussions. All city investments are subject to
the Participatory Budgeting meetings approval.
PB has contributed to social inclusion and cohesion,
as well as to strengthen community groups in order
to allow them mainstreaming their proposals. Lower
income segments of the population have strongly
engaged in meetings, and participation overall has
grown steadily, starting at 628 people in 1990,
to 17359 in 2014. These results demonstrate its
effectiveness in stimulating citizen engagement,
showing trust and investment in the process. Since
most infrastructure works, such as road construction,
street lighting, water and sewer improvements, are
meant to improve the situation of people at risk, the
ability to influence such projects through PB positively
impacts the urban environment. Tangible benefits
have also been produced in infrastructure projects,
with improved accessibility to jobs and housing. Due
to its ability to provide a lens on civil concerns and its
success in improving basic services and quality of life,
PB has been expanded to over 1500 cities across the
world.

Ouagadougou, the capital of Burkina Faso, has a
population of 1.5 million residents, 95% of which live
in urban areas, The city shares similar development
characteristics to Douala, Cameroon, the largest
city in Cameroon with a population of nearly 2.5
million residents. Both cities have experienced rapid
urbanisation along with steady economic growth,
but their ability to become more influential has been
stunted by basic development challenges. Widespread
poverty, social exclusion and an absence of basic
services resulted in the respective Governments
adopting the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP).
The paper recognized the severe repercussions of
unplanned urbanization and its effect on development
and economic growth. The PRSP set objectives to
improve the living conditions of urban dwellers,
strengthen good governance practices and reinforce
the economic roles of towns by supporting new urban
infrastructure.
Instrumental in achieving the PRSP’s ambitious
goals was the City Development Strategy (CDS), a
framework that was formulated by the Cities Alliance
to be appropriated at the local level in Douala and
Ougadougou. The CDS provided the direction for the
long-term development of each city, encompassing
their overarching goals of poverty reduction and
equitable economic development. The formulation
of the strategy was unique for the cities, with a
strong emphasis placed on participation, to ensure
the vision was representative of the wider community
and to inspire local ownership of the CDS. The local
government municipalities led the participatory
approach, using dialogues with numerous
stakeholders to inform the strategy, as well as hosting
Burkina Faso, Ouagadougou and Cameroon, Douala
The Power of a Collective Vision
Author: Serge Allou, Lead Urban Specialist, Cities Alliance
Ouagadougou,BurkinaFaso©Flickr/PhilippeStreicher
workshops for representatives of marginalised and
vulnerable members of the community.
This collaborative exercise resulted in priority
interventions being identified for adoption by local
authorities. Once the CDS was released, each city
ran an extensive advocacy campaign to maintain
effective partnerships at the city level. This step was
crucial in maintaining momentum for the strategy and
transforming it from a didactic exercise to city level
actions.
A major achievement of the CDS has been the
influence it has had on institutional behavior,
resulting in new management capacities that have
since adopted a more inclusive and integrated
urban planning approach. Its coherent and credible
framework has attracted investment from multiple
major donors, with the City of Douala securing
a 212 million loan from the AFD to improve the
city’s drainage system, a significant achievement
for a city that experiences regular heavy flooding.
Similarly, Ouagadougou has been successful in
securing financing opportunities from both the ADB
and AFD totalling EUR 78 million for improving city
sustainability and basic infrastructure. The GHK
project assessment in Douala has been a testament
to its social impact, praising the CDS as a mechanism
for social inclusion by building relationships and
trust between networks of diverse stakeholders.
The importance of the advocacy by the respective
city councils should also be underlined, as it was
instrumental in motivating a critical mass of people
to consider the future of their city, a powerful tool in
achieving sustainable city development.

Canada, Greater Toronto Area
Long Term Food Security through Progressive Planning
Author: Prof. Wayne J. Caldwell, Rural Planning and Development, University of Guelph, Canada
Greenbeltalongthe401highway,TorontoGreatArea
©Wikipedia/Haljackey
Located on the northwestern shore of Lake Ontario
is Toronto, the capital of Ontario and the most
populous city in Canada. The Greater Toronto Area
(GTA) is formed by the central city of Toronto and
the four neighbouring municipalities of Durham,
Halton, Peel and York. The GTA is the fastest growing
region in Ontario, with a forecasted population
increase of 2.5 million (39%), from the current 6.4
million to more than 8.9 million by 2036. The area
is also one of the fastest growing in North America
and a major commercial, financial and economic
centre, located in the midst of some of the best
farmland in Canada. Urban growth within the GTA
has consumed significant acreages of high capability
farmland, threatening the agricultural sector and food
production within the region.
In order to secure agricultural production and prevent
the transformation of rural land into a sprawling urban
landscape, the government of the province adopted
the Greenbelt Act, which led to the development and
implementation of the Greenbelt Plan (GP) in 2005.
The plan, which is reviewed every ten years, specifies
three main goals. Firstly, the protection against the
loss and fragmentation of the agricultural land base
and support of agriculture as the predominant land
use. Secondly, the permanent protection of natural
heritage and water resource systems, which sustain
ecological and human health in Ontario.
Finally, the provision of a range of economic and
social activities associated with rural communities,
agriculture, tourism, recreation, and resource uses.
The GP addresses land protection by four main
policy groups: agricultural system; natural systems;
parklands, open space and trails; and settlement
areas. The implementation of the GP occurs primarily
through the coordination of upper and lower tier
municipalities and amendments to their respective
planning documents. Provincial legislation requires
that municipal planning documents be in conformity
with the GP.
The GP represents an aggressive territorial planning
tool for the protection of the countryside including
significant agricultural lands. According to the
Greenbelt Foundation it has ensured the effective
protection of nearly 2 million acres of land and
nearly 5,500 highly productive farms. Long-term
food security has been addressed within the region,
providing jobs for local population and limiting
environmental impacts, reducing energy consumption
in transportation due to the proximity of agricultural
land and markets. The GP extends beyond agricultural
land, parklands, open spaces and green corridors
have been promoted, increasing the green systems
connectivity and the environmental quality of the
region as a whole.

Shenzhen is a rapidly developing sub-provincial city
that is strategically situated just north of Hong Kong’s
administrative boundary. Over the last forty years,
it has developed from a coastal fishing village of
300,000 in habitants, to a megacity accommodating
approximately 15 million people. The controlled
management of urban growth to stimulate economic
development brings continuous challenges for decision
makers. The ‘Reform and Opening Up’ of the Chinese
economy, led by Deng Xiaoping in 1978, has achieved
tremendous growth, positioning itself as one of the
most dynamic of the world.
Such development was facilitated through robust
governance accompanied by considered and
progressive planning policies. Acknowledging its
strategic proximity to Hong Kong, Shenzhen was
designated China’s first Special Economic Zone (SEZ)
in 1980, a zone which allows experimental economic
reforms in a controlled area. The development of
the city was guided by successive Shenzhen Master
Plans (SMP) from 1982, which captured the strategic
potential of the place, envisioning a manufacturing
city that provides specialised economic functions to
the private industry already established in Hong Kong.
The plan is defined by a belt structure, with a firm
urban growth boundary and a polycentric structure of
cluster industries.
Authors: Hongyang Wang, Professor of Urban and Territorial
Planning, Nanjing University
Shi Nan, Secretary General, Urban Planning Society of
China
Shenzhenriverarea,China©Flickr/yuan2003
The land use plan allowed for comprehensive planning
and design of supporting infrastructure, including
transportation and a green belt corridor to support
proposed industry clusters. The subsequent revision
of the SMP in 1986 strengthened manufacturing
activity while proposing multi-functional development,
supporting a growing service sector and advanced
high-tech economy. In 1996 the SMP included
integrative territorial planning, covering the whole
administrative area and including regional coordination
with Hong Kong, Macau and Guangzhou. The most
recent SMP in 2010 positioned environmental and
social equity as central topics, a focus of many mega
cities.
Strategic and progressive urban planning has
successfully propelled Shenzhen to the economic
powerhouse it is today. Its economic output is now the
4th amongst the 659 cities in China and it generates
similar per capita GDP as many OECD countries. The
growth of the city has been resilient, responding to
change by proactively diversifying its industries over
a comparatively short space of time. So much so that
in 2013 it was named the UNESCO City of Design.
Progressive planning has also mitigated some of the
urban pressures of rapid expansion, with green open
space provisions the largest per capita as compared
to other cities in China. Good governance which has
successfully collaborated with surrounding provinces
and been reformist in its approach has seen Shenzhen
outstrip its title of ‘instant city’, becoming a high
performing, cultural metropolis.
China, Shenzhen
From Fishing Village to Economic Powerhouse

The Yangtze River Delta (YRD) is located in the middle
of China’s Eastern coast and covers three provincial
territories, housing over 160 million inhabitants.
Historically, the YRD was known as a rich and civilized
area, and one of the most integrative regions for
economic, social and cultural interaction. However,
since the 1980s, rapid growth and economic
marketization has led to fast growing economic
disparity, disordered competition, deteriorating
infrastructure and ecological degradation. The need
for a comprehensive and coordinated approach to the
territorial planning of the region was identified as the
only way to reconcile these imbalances.
The year 1982 marked the start of a series of future
thinking, collaborative actions, with the central
government establishing the Shanghai Economic
Region (SER) to coordinate the three provincial
territories of Shanghai, Jiangsu and Zhejiang. A
regional SER planning office was established to
coordinate planning strategies, with a roundtable
of mayors and governors approving the first SER
Development Strategy in 1986. The traction gained
in this regional coordination motivated fourteen cities
in the SER to jointly establish the YRD Fourteen-City
Economic Collaborative Committee, identifying it
as an economic integration region. Following on
from this, provincial and municipal governments
formed the YRD Plan in 2004, with integration as
the major concept. The ongoing endorsement and
support for the YRD integration concept led to local
planning authorities adopting it in their local plans
as a common sense principle in urban development.
China, Yangtze River Delta
The Transformative Power of Integrated Regional Planning
Authors: Hongyang Wang, Professor of
Urban and Territorial Planning, Nanjing
University
Shi Nan, Secretary General, Urban Planning
Society of China
JunctureofthreemainriversinNingbo,China
©Wikipedia/JiongSheng
Further sanctioning of the integrated YRD concept
came from academics and entrepreneurs who actively
took part in research and planning, establishing think-
tanks, forums and symposium to contribute to the
open and growing dialogue surrounding the YRD’s
coordinated development.
This comprehensive system of regional planning and
coordination worked to bring together stakeholders
from various circles, and raise crucial issues of
competition and cooperation. The benefits gained
from the collaborative approach have been numerous.
Improved connectivity between regions made travel
distances between most cities just one hour by high
speed train, a major feat for an area that spans 210
thousand km2. By validating the poly-centric urban
structure with diversified and complementing urban
functions, the regions development disparities were
greatly mitigated. In 1978, the GDP per capita of
Shanghai was 5.8 and 7.8 times as much as that of
Jiangsu and Zhejiang. In 2013, this figure respectively
dropped to 1.2 and 1.3; whilst the GDP share of YRD
in China had risen from 18% in 1978 to 21% in 2013
with the population share remaining some 11%.
Even today, more national reforms and development
experiments are taking place such as urban-rural
integration and new models of modernization,
which demonstrates the adaptability of the YRD and
supports its sustainable urban development into the
future.

Colombia, Medellin
Reshaping Medellin through Social Urbanism
Authors: Elkin Velasquez, Director, UN-Habitat Regional
Office for Latin America and the Caribbean
Luc Aldon, Consultant, UN-Habitat Regional
Office for Latin America and the Caribbean
Medellin,Colombia©EduardoFeuerhake
Medellin is the second largest city in Colombia and the
capital of the department of Antioquia. It constitutes,
together with other nine neighbouring cities, the
second largest agglomeration in Colombia in terms
of population and economy, with approximately
2.44 million inhabitants and accounting for 11% of
the Colombian economy. Medellin is a relevant hub
for education, industrial and commercial activities,
science, health services, leisure and entertainment.
During the eighties and the nineties drug trafficking
and bombings made the city inhospitable.
Nevertheless the city registered a demographic
growth, due to rural exodus. The development model
of the city combined with the ongoing process of
urban sprawl and the population growth, increased
fragmentation of the territory and exclusion of the
poor population at the metropolitan and city scales.
Since 2003, the elected mayors brought a more
holistic paradigm to territorial planning, defined
by social urbanism. It consisted of physical
transformations in the urban fringes which sought to
make public places safe and accessible, connecting
these areas to the city center, and considering
environmental factors in the reintegration of the
city. Secondly, the social transformation followed
the former components by fostering community and
individual participation in urban regulation, economic
integration and reducing fear and violence to
encourage solidarity-based cohabitation.
The specific tool that enabled these transformations
was the Integral Urban Project (IUP), which targeted
specific locations characterised by unrest and poverty,
and where a 40% of Medellin’s population lived.
The IUP envisioned a set of innovative, original
and adapted development projects to leverage
urban mobility for inhabitants, installing improved
transportation systems and urban services within these
particular sites.
Through the IUP, Medellin managed to articulate
its Structuring Master Plan with fixed interventions
in order to foster territorial dynamism, connect
territories, integrate economic activities, promote
social inclusion and contribute to the creation of
peaceful neighborhoods. Furthermore, the physical
interventions such as automatic escalators, the Library
Parks and the Metrocable are known worldwide and
attract leisure and professional tourism. As a result
of the transparent and efficient management of the
projects and resources, tax collection has increased
by 35% between 2003 and 2007. Furthermore, the
homicide rate has reduced by 80% over the past
twenty years. This demonstrates how social urbanism
in Medellin has contributed to the construction
of peace by establishing a new civic culture and
enhancing participative tools in its methodology,
clarifying duties and rights relative to prevention of
delinquency and violence.

Imbaba is a neighbourhood in northern Giza, Egypt,
located west of the Nile and northwest of downtown
Cairo, within the Giza Governorate. It is one of Cairo’s
most populated and unplanned areas. The northern
sector, which comprises 1,270 hectares, is home to
almost one million inhabitants. The sector lacks access
to primary services, such as schools, health service and
public transportation. It also suffers from insufficient
water supply, poor solid waste management and
absence of sewage in most of the residential areas.
The main objective of the Imbaba Urban Upgrading
Project was to strengthen the integration of Imbaba
in the city of Cairo and to provide basic facilities,
infrastructures, and service to its inhabitants. The
main concept of the project relied on proposing the
best use of the land of the former Imbaba Airport,
an old out-of-service infrastructure that lied inside
the urban mass of Giza. The Imbaba project was
launched in 2006 and its implementation started in
2009, aiming to upgrade for the whole area through
five sub-urban regeneration projects coordinated
through a master plan. The project was developed
by the General Organization for Physical Planning
affiliated to the Ministry of Housing, Utilities and New
Urban Communities, in conjunction with the Giza
Governorate in 2006 as a preliminary concept, that
developed in 2008 as a final master plan.
Egypt, Greater Cairo Region An Airport The Renegeration of a
Brownfield that Achieves Inclusion and Connectivity
Author: Sahar Attia, Head of the Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Egypt
Imbababridge©Flickr/Hossamel-Hamalawy
These five projects include; a mix use housing
neighborhood, the Imbaba park, the corridor of
Ahmed Orabi which links the neighborhood to the
ring road, transformation of the existing aviation
academy into a hospital, school and a district building
and finally the waterfront pedestrian walkway, which
will offer Imbaba residents the opportunity to enjoy
the Nile, improving accessibility and provision of open
space for the whole neighborhood.
The main achievement of this urban regeneration
project is to have addressed the main concerns
of sustainable urban development and territorial
cohesion, within the framework of an integrated
planning approach favouring the spatial planning of
living areas. The project has improved the connectivity
of the Greater Cairo region through road network
and the metro line (under construction). It has also
upgraded unplanned sites, created green spaces and
provided facilities for the neighbourhood. The project
has successfully transformed vacant plots, wasteland
and dump sites into educational and health facilities,
public spaces, public buildings and cultural centres.
From the total cost of USD 110 million, 20% has
come from the engagement of the private sector.
Imbaba has also become a well-known experience that
attracts many researchers and practitioners to witness
an innovative way of dealing with informal areas,
becoming a best practice example with replicability
potential.

Europe, Leipzig Charter
Supra-National Coordination for Universal Sustainability
Authors: André Mueller, Federal Research Institute on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development (BBSR) at the Federal Office for Building and Regional
Planning (BBR), Germany
Brigitte Bariol-Mathais, French Federation of Urban Planning Agencies (FNAU), France
Prof. Elke Pahl-Weber, Director of the City and Regional Planning Institute, Berlin Technical University, Germany
Berlin,Germany©Flickr/RonelReyes
European cities differ greatly in their urban models
and the development challenges they face, possessing
diverse historical, economic, social and environmental
backgrounds. They each bear unique cultural
qualities and exceptional possibilities for economic
development, but also suffer from demographic
problems of social exclusion along with issues of
affordable housing and employment opportunities.
It is with the knowledge of these pressures that the
European Union proposed a supra-national policy
to integrate urban management across the member
states and proactively minimise negative externalities.
The EU Member State’s Ministers responsible for Urban
Development Policies adopted the Leipzig Charter on
Sustainable European Cities in 2007. These common
principles and strategies for urban development
policy propose integrated urban development as the
path to achieve successful urban sustainability. The
key objectives in achieving this were underlined as
delivering economic growth at a national, regional
and local level while also overcoming social and spatial
exclusion.
In signing the Charter, Ministers agree to initiate
political debate to integrate its principles into local
development policies and to promote balanced
territorial organisation. Ministers adopted a ‘Reference
Framework for Sustainable European Cities’ (RFSC)
which operationalized the Charter. The RFSC is an
online tool which provides local actors with indicators
to assess the degree of sustainability of their urban
development projects or strategies.
The importance and value of setting urban policy
frameworks at a supranational level is demonstrated
by the City Region Project. This project of local
and regional authorities has gathered extensive
and relevant information in city-regional planning
cooperation agreements and launched specific
regional pilot projects to explore new planning
cooperation in the fields of land use management and
transportation. The Dialogue for Change City-Network
has developed since the signing of the Leipzig Charter,
establishing the first peer-to-peer network of cities,
and enabling pairs of transatlantic cities to jointly
revise and update daily urban planning mechanisms.

Lyon is located in the eastern-central part of France,
in the Rhone-Alpes region. The city is the third largest
city of France with an estimated population of 2.1
million inhabitants. The region has a long tradition
of urban planning and Greater Lyon Metropolis, the
metropolitan inter-municipal body which gathers 59
municipalities, has been responsible for the territorial
development of the region for the last 50 years.
Lyon’s main challenges have been metropolitan
coordination, regeneration of mix-used districts in the
core city, integration of deprived suburban districts
in the metropolitan dynamic, quality of public spaces
and integrated heritage management. During the
functionalist planning period, neighborhoods were
constructed, mostly to accommodate the low-
income population. These neighborhoods have been
subsequently facing huge problems of unemployment
and poverty, raising social tensions in the city.
To address these challenges, Greater Lyon articulated
planning as a framework for preparing concrete urban
interventions. In 1992, a master plan named “Lyon
2010” was approved for the Greater Lyon, designing
main lines of development areas of future urban
projects based on the regeneration of former industrial
districts and brownfields. The master plan also
envisioned new metro and tramway lines to inclusively
connect the city center and the suburbs. Programmes
for urban renovation, renewal and revalorization
have been developed since 2008 to improve the
provision of services and the quality of life in deprived
neighborhoods. A system for local management
complemented this renewal initiative, improving the
maintenance of public spaces and increasing safety
and security, with a total programme investment of
EUR 8.4 million.
France, Lyon
Metropolitan Planning Towards Inclusion and Quality of Life
Author: Brigitte Bariol-Mathais, General
Manager, French Federation of Urban
Planning Agencies (FNAU), France
Lyon,France©Flickr/Guerric
To improve heritage management, planning
documents were required to include historic
documentation and tools for heritage protection and
management. Through applying territorial strategies
to address the main planning challenges, Lyon has
developed strong technical tools to elaborate and
implement its policies, such as mutualized teams at
the metropolitan level, an urban planning agency
at the metropolitan level, and dedicated public
operational bodies to drive the implementation of
the urban projects. Special mention is required for
the many planning tools created to enable the master
plan implementation, such as the land use plan, the
lighting plan, which deals with the enhancement of
nocturnal landscape, the Colors Plan for the protection
of the cultural heritage, the Green Plan for the
protection of natural and agricultural land, the Blue
Plan, for the organisation of the river banks and the
Plan Technopole, for the development of production
and research centers.
The process of urban regeneration guided by the
Greater Lyon 2010 master plan has been an exemplary
case of integration and the delivery of different
scales of planning. In this model, each project
assumes a particular value as a part of a broader
general structure, re-organizing the metropolis
through establishing new thematic frameworks: (1)
the revitalisation of public spaces in the centre and
in suburban areas; (2) the enhancement of urban
landscape, parks and historical parts of the city; (3) the
creation of new centralities of urban and economic
growth and (4) the enhancement of mobility through
the realisation of a new public transport and road
network. Due to these fine-grain urban development
strategies, Lyon is considered a “laboratory for
planning and governance policies”.

France and Germany, Strasbourg-Kehl
A Cross-Border Urban Project to Deliver Local Development
Authors: Anne Pons, General Manager of the Urban Agency of Strasbourg, France
Marianne Malez, French Federation of Urban Planning Agencies (FNAU), France
Kehl-Strasbourgbridge©Flickr/PatrickMüller
The history of Strasbourg, capital city of the Alsace
Region, located on the left bank of the Rhine River,
has been determined by its role as a border-city
between France and Germany. Since 1945, Strasbourg
has attempted to establish links with the German city
of Kehl am Rhine, located on the right bank. Lack
of coordination between the cities had hindered for
many years the re-development of derelict sites on
both banks of the Rhine due to the administrative
divide. Improvements in connectivity and
environmental management had also been hampered
due to the absence of a common vision for the
sustainable development of border region. This was
overcome when a development proposal for a factory
along the shared border gathered much protest from
both sides, motivating collaborative action for the
vision and development of the area.
The need for collaborative governance of the border
area was achieved by establishing the Strasbourg-Kehl
Commission, a cooperative steered by the mayors
of each municipality. This allowed for a coordinated
approach in the identification and implementation of
cross border projects. Projects are undertaken under
the legal framework of the Karlsruhe Act, which
allows both countries to use their own management
team for projects or come to an alternative mutual
agreement.
While the first project proposed in 1982 did not go
ahead, a chain of integrative projects during the
80’s and 90’s subsequently led to the drafting of the
joint Master Plan for Strasbourg-Kehl. The Agency
for Development and Planning for the Strasbourg
Agglomeration (ADEUS) has played the role of
moderating disagreements and bringing together
partners and stakeholders towards a common vision.
Institutional cohesion for Strasbourg-Kehl has
supported spatial and territorial planning at a supra
national level, maximising economic and social
opportunities at a cross-border level. The cities have
collaboratively established a vision for the future
of the metropolitan area by understanding their
complementarities, building their metropolitan
functions and institutions and integrating
infrastructural developments. Projects which
strengthen the economic and cultural links between
the area are numerous, with the success of one project
leading to funding and support for the next, creating
a domino effect in collaborative urban development.
The project success paved the way for a trans-region
Air Protection Plan and a Franco-German Tourist
Office. Most recently, the Deux Rives du Rhin urban
development project has created a truly integrated
conurbation, providing shared public facilities such
as the Jardins de Deux Rives, the Strasbourg-Kehl
tramline and the pedestrian footbridge between to the
two cities.

The Rhine-Ruhr metropolitan area is the largest
urban agglomeration in Germany and one of the
largest urban areas in Europe, having developed
as a major manufacturing and coal mining centre
through the first half of the 20th century. With
the de-industrialization process that took place in
Germany from mid-1970s and the transformation of
the energy production model, industrial activities have
relocated, jobs have disappeared and the number of
inhabitants in the area consequently dropped. As a
result, the Rhine-Ruhr Area is currently a region with
declining population and facing deep demographic
and economic challenges.
To stimulate ecological, environmental and urban
revitalisation, the International Building Exhibition
(IBA) at Emscher Park was initiated by the State
Government of North Rhine-Westphalia in 1989.
During a period of ten years, the IBA project aimed to
give the region a greener image and to breathe life
into the old industrial plants. A vision for the area was
developed and a master plan was drafted, including
specific projects that targeted abandoned industrial
sites, transforming them into facilities to improve
the quality of the urban areas surrounding the old
industries.
Germany, The Rhine-Ruhr Metropolitan Area
Breathing New Life into Post-Industrial Cities
Author: Prof. Elke Pahl-Weber, Director of the City and Regional Planning Institute, Berlin Technical University, Germany
Rhine-Ruhrregion©Flickr/Allersuffit
Steel cookers became stages, the buildings of the
large coal mine “Zeche Zollverein” in Essen became
a multi-purpose centre with conference facilities, the
storing sites for the steel production became a park
using the historical structure but filling it with greenery
to form part of a green belt that unifies the regio. A
key aspect of the IBA was that funding came not only
from the State Government but also from developers,
private companies, non-profit groups and local town
governments that worked specifically on individual
projects connected to the park.
After more than 20 years of planning and
implementation, the Emscher Landscape Park has
gone from a purely fantastical vision to a reality that
has inspired new urban development. The project
has achieved lasting improvements in the living and
working environment of the surrounding towns by
upgrading the ecological and aesthetic quality of
their nearby countryside. Furthermore, by reusing
and preserving the impressive relics of the industrial
era, the Ruhr region has been able to keep its
unique identity and has branded itself as an ancient
monument of industrial society. After many successful
examples, the IBA has been institutionalized as an
instrument for urban and territorial planning, which
has been able to envision and guide the collaborative
and participative development of cities such as Basel,
Berlin or Hamburg.

Haiti, Port-au-Prince
The Value of Planning in a Post-Disaster Situation
Authors: Rose-May Guignard, Comité Interministériel d’Aménagement du Territoire, Haiti
Alexis Doucet and Virginie Rachmuhl, Groupe de Recherche et d’Echanges Technologiques (GRET), France
Port-Au-Prince,Haiti©UN-Habitat/JuliusMwelu
Port-au-Prince is the capital and the largest city in
Haiti. The city is located in the Gulf of Gonave, and
has an estimated population of 900,000 inhabitants.
Port-au-Prince is characterized by poorly built housing
structures, fast and uncontrolled urban growth
and existence of human settlements in high-risk
disaster areas. Eighty percent of the urban fabric
consists of poorly serviced and unmapped informal
neighborhoods. In January 2010, Port-au-Prince was
catastrophically affected by an earthquake, which
destroyed a large amount of structures in the city,
was estimated to have caused 230,000 deaths. In the
absence of maps, population census and other urban
and social data, the institutions in Port-au-Prince were
unable to assess the needs and to set priorities for
the reconstruction of the city. Scattered small- scale
projects conducted by NGOs, further weakened public
institutions at the municipal and national scales,
unable to channel international investments. This
coupled with a confusing and incomplete Haitian law
on urban planning regarding the responsibilities and
overlapping mandates of the different institutions
resulted in the implementation of a patchwork of
urban rehabilitation projects.
In the post-disaster setting, planning stood out as
a key tool to build the resilience of the city and of
populations at risk and to set a framework for the
coordination of the different interventions of NGOs.
The revelation of the urban management issue
resulted in the development of coordinating bodies,
moving from sectorial clusters to territorial, multi-
sectorial coordinating bodies.
This initially difficult situation had a significant and
positive impact, both on better recognition of the
informal neighborhoods by the Haitian authorities
and on acknowledgement by the international
organizations of the importance of urban planning
in recovery and development projects. Armed with
these developments, Haitian institutions, relayed by
international donors, managed implement diagnostics
and urban development plans prior to any intervention
at scale. These new tools could provide a substantial
amount of data on areas hitherto largely unknown,
such as socio-urban surveys, mapping and census,
as a first step towards their integration into the
formal city. The creation of the Technical Committee
in 2013 brought coordination and expertise to the
development plans, clarifying processes and roles of
the different stakeholders
Territorial planning has been critical in the prioritization
and reconstruction of the city of Port-au-Prince. Four
years after the earthquake, public institutions now
control and validate urban development projects
carried out by NGOs, and all neighborhood-wide
projects financed by donors have been conditioned
by the prior production of a development plan. In
parallel, the Interministerial Committee for Territorial
Planning organized two Regional Urban Forums and
the first Haitian National Urban Forum to foster citizen
participation. They led to the drafting of a Declaration
of Participants now translated into a roadmap for
public institutions.

India, Ahmedabad
Connectivity, Integration and Inclusion through Transport Planning
Author: Shipra Narang Suri,Vice-president, International Society of City and Regional Planners (ISOCARP), India
Ahmedabad is the largest city in the western Indian
state of Gujarat, with an estimated population of 5.8
million inhabitants. The city has emerged as a key
industrial, commercial, economic and educational
hub. In the late 1970’s, the administrative capital of
the state was moved to the new city of Gandhinagr.
This political shift, together with the deceleration
of industrial activity and the instability brought by
political and social agitation, marked the start of a
long period of Ahmedabad’s decline. Subsequent
underinvestment in infrastructure and services led to
a string of transport challenges including poor service
quality, unreliability, an exponential increase in private
vehicles leading to high levels of congestion and
reduction in air quality.
The Janmarg Bus Rapid Transit System (BRTS) was
designed as a strategic intervention, to attract latent
transit demand, improve air quality and promote the
compactness of the city. At the metropolitan scale, the
project was developed under the broader framework
of the Ahmedabad-Mumbai corridor, and the
Ahmedabad-Pune stretch. The decision to build the
Janmarg, was made in 2005 by a high-level committee
chaired by the Chief Minister of Gujarat, under the
broader “Accessible Ahmedabad” framework, which
aimed at redesigning the city structure and transport
systems towards better accessibility, efficient mobility
and lower carbon emissions. The BRT initiative
was developed in line with the Comprehensive
Development Plan (CDP) prepared for the period
2006-2012, in which Ahmedabad’s Integrated Transit
Strategy aimed at developing a system comprising
an improved public bus system, the BRTS, suburban
railways and a metro.
AhmedabadBRTsystem©Flickr/velaparatodo
The objective was to increase the public transport
share from the existing 17% to 40% over a period of
10 years by reducing the need for travel, travel length
and automobile dependence. The plan consisted of
the development of 217 kilometres of BRT corridors
with a radial structure and a ring corridor.
The implementation of this urban and territorial
planning transportation strategy has enhanced
accessibility, connectivity, social inclusiveness and
environmental quality in Ahmedabad. 26 percent
of two wheeler users have shifted to BRTS, which is
widely viewed as being more inclusive. In off-peak
hours, mainly afternoons, nearly 40 percent of the
commuters are women. With an average trip length
of 7km, the system saves 200,000 vehicle kilometres
per day. Furthermore, the network serves as many
low-income areas as higher-income communities
across the city. The widening of the BRT corridor has
helped to increase connectivity and has catalysed
development throughout the city. From the urban
planning perspective, the project has contributed
with several innovations, including fully pedestrian
and transit street sections and one-way bus lanes to
manage narrow right-of-way. The implementation
of the BRT system has also created new roads and
bridges that have improved the connectivity of the
city. The BRT has also encouraged urban regeneration,
as former vacant mill lands have been transformed
into new housing and shopping areas for the urban
poor. Another remarkable innovation lies in the cross-
subsidy mechanism that has used land value capture
as a system to ensure the BRT affordability. The biggest
achievement though, has been to showcase that the
BRT system works for the Indian context if adapted to
the local context and culture.

Author: Imam S Ernawi, Director General of Human Settlements,
Ministry of Public Works, Indonesia
Port-Au-Prince,Haiti©UN-Habitat/JuliusMwelu
Surabaya is the second largest city in Indonesia with
a population of over 3.1 million inhabitants. The
city is an important economic centre for Indonesia,
as the urban hinterland of the Surabaya, around 7
million people, accommodates a large national and
home-grown industrial conurbation, producing for
the consumption markets of Java and Indonesia. As
the capital of East Java province and as a port city
supporting trade and services, Surabaya has rapidly
developed, and its urban landscape is nowadays
characterized by new medium-rise office blocks,
modern markets and hotels along green boulevards
co-existing with the early 20th century heritage. The
low-income, popular neighbourhoods – the kampongs
– are particularly important to preserve the indigenous
socio-cultural values of the city. Successive land use
plan revisions have oscillated, either trying to hold
up a ‘modern’ city vision or reverting to unplanned
urbanization, where mangroves face extinction,
city rivers remain heavily polluted and indigenous
kampongs remain poor, revealing a latent social
imbalance.
In 2005, Surabaya established a flagship Green
Kampong programme, embedded in its innovative
planning and development strategy for the city.
The programme has become a citywide strategy,
combining tools for governance and development
such as decentralizing planning decisions, encouraging
local democracy, participatory planning and
budgeting, and environmental management. At the
city level, Surabaya has introduced a “Citizen Park
Space Programme”, a sub-project which worked with
slum communities to re-locate them from degrading
river banks, and transform the areas into popular
green community parks, each co-opted by local private
companies that have become sponsors of Surabaya’s
sustainable development. At the neighborhood
level, Surabaya has encouraged communities adopt
a zero-subsidy kampong greening approach, instead
generating revenue through their own small-scale
green entrepreneurship. Local companies and media
are sought to promote competitions and award
innovation and best practice at a local level. National
poverty reduction programmes are recorded through
a collaborative e-governance mapping platform,
allowing easy identification of service provision gaps.
Through strategic territorial planning policies, a more
compact and environmental friendly city has emerged,
with green neighborhoods at the center of the
urban development proposal. The Green Kampong
programme has delivered a community based solid
waste management system, leading to revenue
generation, employment and a decrease of disease
among more than 100,000 participating households.
The e-governance platform for map-based community
budgeting has strengthened social cohesion and
participation and allowed a more equitable distribution
of resources. Local media and private sector key
players have been mobilised in support of community
driven initiatives for green and safe public spaces. Not
to be under estimated, the increasingly active and
informed urban community have influenced decision-
making in favour of the long term vision of sustainable
urbanization for Surabaya and the region.
Indonesia, Surabaya
Championing Green Community Development

Fukuoka City is located on the northern shore of
the island of Kyushu in the southern part of Japan.
With 1.5 million inhabitants, it is the sixth most
populated city in Japan. Since Japan’s accelerated
economic development from the 1950s, managing
controlled urbanisation has been a major focus for
city planners and leaders. The risk of urban sprawl,
an all too often outcome of rapid urbanisation, was
a major concern due to the negative impact it has
on social, environmental and economic sustainability.
With limited water resources, water scarcity has also
been an important consideration in land use patterns
and spatial distribution, with the need to efficiently
and equitable deliver resources to current and future
populations.
To ensure the sustainable development of the city,
forward thinking leadership instilled compact planning
principles in policies and plan from the 1960s.
Primarily seen as a service and commercial centre,
successive master plans concentrated Fukuoka’s urban
development around Hakata bay, creating a doorway
to Asia while providing economic and recreation
opportunities for citizens. The Basic City Framework in
1976 supported compact urbanisation by promoting
transit oriented development.
Japan, Fukuoka
Compact Principles for Improved Quality of Life
Author: Prof.Toshiyasu Noda, Department of Law,
Seinan Gakuin University, Fukuoka, Japan
Fukuokapark©Flickr/TakashiH
Adequate densities has allowed for a comprehensive
and diverse transport options, including trains,
subways, bike paths and private transit options,
strengthening the connectivity among core economic
centres with the seaport, rail and airport hubs. .
Additionally, to minimise the adverse impacts of
densification, The Urban Landscape Ordinance was
enacted in 1987, with an emphasis on preserving the
amenity of cityscapes and reinforcing the historical
and cultural characteristics of the area for improved
quality of life. High quality urban environments are
also incentivised through ‘Urban Beautification Award’
which promotes design quality.
Fukuoka has successfully developed as a major urban
centre through compact urban planning principles,
resulting in a productive, attractive and inclusive city.
It has been widely reported as Japan’s most liveable
city, an attribute which is commonly sought after in
our increasingly urbanised world, and one which is
innately linked to features of compact development.
The efficient and multi-modal public transportation
network has resulted in a commute time of less
than half an hour for nearly 50% of the population
increasing productivity and quality of life. Furthermore,
over 250,000 people ride to work each day due to
proximity, a trend which begun before environmental
consciousness was as widespread as it is today. A
testament to Fukuoka’s inclusive and progressive
urban development approach is the response of its
citizens, with 90% of reporting that they were proud
of their city.

Morocco
Relieving Urban Pressures through New Towns and City Extensions
Authors: Dr. Hassan Radoine, Director and Professor, National School of Architecture, Rabat, Morocco
Dr. Mohamed El Mati, Professor National School of Architecture, Rabat, Morocco
Casablanca,Morocco©UN-Habitat/HamzaNuino
Being a gateway to Africa and Europe, Morocco
is home to over 33 million inhabitants of which
6.3% are urban. Since the twentieth century, most
major Moroccan cities have been newly planned
either through urban extensions of historical cities
or through new towns development. The slum
population however grew 5.6% per year between
1992 and 2004, reaching 8.2% of the urban
households in 2004, which represented around 1.7
million people living in 1000 slums. In 2004, building
on the commitment to the Millennium Development
Goals, the government launched two major national
initiatives to tackle slums and housing issues: the Cities
without Slums Programme and the development of
four new towns. These initiatives, based on a twin-
track approach, were part of a larger government
strategy to enhance the supply of affordable and
adequate housing.
The Al Omrane Group, a government-owned holding
company that acts through local subsidiaries, was
established in 2007 to implement the development
of new towns and the programme of Cities without
Slums. The development of new towns has mostly
targeted low income households in the region
of Marrakesh (new town of Tamansourt), Rabat
(new town of Tamesna), Casablanca (new town
of Sahel-Lakhyayta) and Tangiers (new town of
Chrafate), which accounted for more than 50% of
the households living in slums countywide. Despite
responding to increased housing demand, several
shortcomings emerged following implementation,
including site locations that are fully state-owned land,
weak feasibility studies, a lack of adequate mixed
land-uses and social diversity.
Nevertheless, new towns are rethinking social
housing through an urban scheme, rather than solely
pursuing interventionist projects that are often not
proportionate with the scale of demand. Accordingly,
since 2009, a “second generation of new towns”,
such as Zenata, Benguérir Ville verte and Khouribga
Mine verte, was developed to address the above
shortcomings. This new group of new towns has
been launched with new stakeholders in the private
sector and in partnership with state companies, such
as the Office Chérifien des Phosphates (leader in
phosphate industry) and the Caisse de Dépot et de
Gestion (state-owned financial institution active in
real estate development). The “first generation” was
mainly focused on new towns development, while the
“second generation” pursued the planning of large
urban extensions of existing cities.
Despite huge financial investments, the first
generation of new towns has had a limited impact
to date on responding to the housing demand and
relieving pressure from metropolises. The first two
new towns – Tamansourt (2004) and Tamesna (2007) -
have attracted a total of 85 000 people out of the 700
000 expected (12%). The government has however
taken corrective actions to revitalize these towns
through appropriate recovery plans and appointing an
inter-ministerial committee to implement them. The
key lesson learnt from these practices is to invest in
non-residential assets and employment opportunities
in order to create attractive, productive and liveable
and cities. Financial mechanisms and investment
frameworks, such as public/private partnerships,
have also helped in structuring and modernizing the
construction, real estate and housing sectors.

Norway is a Scandinavian country positioned in
Northern Europe, with a population of just over 5
million inhabitants. Its economy has been dominated
by oil and gas exports, positioning it as one of the
top 20 countries with the highest CO2 emissions.
According to forecasts made by the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Norway’s annual
mean temperature is expected to rise by 3.4 degrees
Celsius this century and precipitation has already
increased by 20% since 1900.
Acknowledging the vital role cities play in mitigating
climate risk, Norway has adopted a multifaceted
urban policy approach. In particular, municipalities
were identified as having significant responsibility
in influencing the urban environment at a local
level and in turn influencing constituent attitudes
to energy consumption. In 2007, White Paper no.
33 addressed the need for greater climate change
adaptation methods and in 2008, the government
issued planning guidelines requesting municipalities
to prepare climate and energy plans to address
climate change. This was ratified in the Planning and
Building Act, where section 1 stated that addressing
climate change should be one of the main focuses
of planning. This legislation led to a series of
assessments conducted at a local level, to identify
risks and vulnerabilities, but also flag opportunities to
proactively adapt. Developing from this, the Cities of
the Future Programme invited thirteen of Norway’s
largest cities to take part in a collaborative project
Norway
Cities of the Future Integrating Climate Change Adaptation
Author: Hilde Moe, Senior Advisor, Department of Planning, Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation, Norway
Bergen,Norway©Flickr/RobynLee
to reduce emissions and make cities more liveable.
Integral to this was the concept of compact cities,
those which favour walking and cycling and promote
dense, liveable urban forms. The programme sought
to create a stronger connection between federal
and regional areas, as well encourage collaboration
between industry and citizens. Consequently,
participating cities worked with a range of
stakeholders to create an action plan that synchronise
future land use patterns with sectorial projects.
The Norwegian Government has successfully mobilised
a variety of stakeholders to transform climate
policy into concrete actions. By understanding the
fundamental link that urban planning has on climate
mitigation, federal government has been able to take
calculated steps in influencing national, regional,
local and sectorial actions through legislation and
planning. Today, 13 cities have included adaptation
to climate change as a goal in their master plan and
detailed plans, an increase from only 2 cities in 2008.
Further to this, vulnerability assessments have led to
revised master plans which address areas at risk of sea
level rises and inundation caused through flooding.
This has been possible due to the Cities of the Future
Programme, which has created a forum for ideas
sharing, resulting in insurance companies sharing
spatial data on flooding claims. The value added to
the programme through integration of urban planning
and sectorial policies has improved Norway’s resilience
to climate change and created an ongoing dialogue
between key actors, an important asset in urban
management for the future.

Krasnoyarsk is one of the regional centers of Siberia,
Russia and it is located on the banks of the Yenisei
River. It is the third largest city of Siberia after
Novosibirsk and Omsk, with a population of more
than one million inhabitants. Krasnoyarsk’s population
experienced a rapid growth during the Second World
War, when the Soviet factories were evacuated
towards the east, stimulating the industrial growth of
the city. Furthermore, after the war, additional large
manufacturing aluminum and metallurgic plants were
built. Eventually, heavy industries and coal heating
power degraded the environmental quality of the
city, turning Krasnoyarsk in one of the most polluted
cities of the Russian Federation. The Soviet urban
planning model exacerbated this situation, creating
a car dependent disconnected city without adequate
walkable streets, lack of public spaces, no waterfront
access and derelict industrial areas. As a result
Krasnoyarsk experienced a population drop of 6%
during the 90’s, from 925,000 to 870,000 inhabitants.
In 2012, the Municipal Authority of Krasnoyarsk
realized that the city required a shift towards
sustainable development and a new economic profile
which did not exclusively rely on heavy industries.
Pushed by the municipal authority, a new master
plan was drafted, disowning the industry-oriented
urban planning of the socialist city, focusing instead
on high technology opportunities, ecological stability
and a human-centred approach. The new master plan
proposed five main priorities: (1) redevelopment to
non-polluting highly technological industries, with
relocation of polluting activities outside the city and
limitation of percentage of land used for industrial
activities,
Russia, Siberian Federal District, Krasnoyarsk
Building an International City through a New Urban Planning Paradigm
Author: Alexey Kozmin, Center for Urban Research,Tomsk State University, Russia
Krasnoyarsk,Russia©Flickr/PasiHilli
(2) creation of a connected system of public spaces
and pedestrianisation of river-front and embankments,
(3) prioritization of public transport system (4) new
economy of knowledge and international positioning
through events, and (5) community participation.
The completion of the Krasnoyarsk master has been
a decisive territorial planning tool to position the
development of Siberia and the Russian Far East in the
national agenda, supporting the realization of new
economic growth models for the region. One of the
accomplishments of this global positioning campaign
to transform Krasnoyarsk has been the election of
the city as the future host of the University Olympic
Games 2019. This new economic growth approach
offers the opportunity to develop not only modern
sport infrastructures but also a new development cycle
to improve quality of life and reshape the image of the
city. The plan has also contributed to create awareness
of the economic potential that the proximity of fast-
growing Asian markets represent. The urban planning
shift from a rigid approach to a more sustainable
urban model has entailed major impacts for the
city. Residential densities and building proximity
have increased, reducing energy consumption for
heating and transportation. The percentage of land
allocated to industrial uses inside the city is expected
to decrease by 24% over the next twenty years, in
favour of office space and land for transportation and
recreation. Improved connectivity, provision of open
space and less industrial activities have improved the
environmental quality of the air and the water of the
region as a whole.

Russia, Yekaterinburg
Mitigating Competing Interests through Urban Land Reform
Author: Andrey Ivanov, Consultant,
UN-Habitat
Yekaterinburg,Russia©Flickr/AndrijBulba
Yekaterinburg is the fourth largest city in the Russian
Federation with a population of 1.4 million. It is a
major economic, transportation, scientific and cultural
centre, positioned on the border between Europe
and Asia. At the start of the 21st century, the city’s
urban development processes were still reflective
of Soviet philosophy, characterized by long term,
arbitrary laws, which had resulted in a decline in the
urban environment and quality of life. Contributing
to this was the reflexive development decisions
made by municipal authorities, which were heavily
influence by private interests. In 2005, a new Urban
Planning Code came into force, specifying the need
for all municipalities to develop a new urban planning
tool, the Rules of Land Use Development (RLUD),
which would be a turning point for the City of
Yekaterinburg.
The RLUD sought to balance public and private
interests to improve the urban environment for
the future. It was developed with a consortium of
noncommercial foundations, beginning with an
analysis of over 87,000 plots, to determine the current
land uses, along with the social, economic, transport
and ecological condition of the area. This process
identified distinct territorial zones, with specific
overlapping uses, resulting in the creation of the Land
Use Planning Map, a graphic manner of reflecting the
intensity of development and services. In contrast to
past urban development laws, the approach of the
RLUD was distinctly democratic and public hearings
were held frequently regarding the new proposed
land use zoning and many modifications were
made based on this feedback. Previously classified
information on industrial and waste zones was also
declassified, underscoring the transparent outlook of
the RLUD. Once established, the RLUD formed the
legal framework for the implementation of the Urban
Development Master Plan, regulating urban planning
activities, identifying shortages of transportation
and social infrastructure, protected sites of cultural
and historic significance and restricted the impact
of industrial activities on the urban and natural
environment.
The implementation of the RLUD tested a new
approach on how to seek agreement between
private parties and local authorities, creating a better
integrated and coordinated planning system. The
reformed process provided a new feedback channel
for communication with the public after an extended
period of exclusion from the urban development
process. Reflective of the open and consultative
approach were the several hundred public hearings
held regarding changes to definitions, with the City
Duma approving certain changes to the definition
of statute-allowed use based on this feedback.
This process has made the relationship between
authorities and developers more transparent, while
accommodating the interest of landowners. The
RLUD has become a model for urban development
that improves the quality of the human environment
through successfully balancing competing interests in
a participatory and collaborative approach to land use
development.

South Africa, Gauteng City Region
City-Regional Integration for Prosperity
Author: Rashid Seedat, Head of Gauteng Planning
Division, Office of the Premier, Gauteng Provincial
Government, South Africa
Pretoria,Gauteng,SouthAfrica©ThamaraFortes
Gauteng accounts for just 1.5% of the territory of
South Africa, but is the highest populated region
in the country, with 12.3 million inhabitants, a
quarter of the national population. It has a diverse
economy which contributes to over 35% of the
country’s GDP. This is driven by four main polycentric
conurbations, comprising large populations and
labour markets, dense commuting flows and spatial
agglomeration economies. A functioning city-region
can create a thriving economy through spatial
and social integration. For Gauteng, the enduring
legacy of apartheid has left high levels of social
exclusion, poverty, inequality and spatial dislocation.
Additionally, high polluting industrial uses and derelict
manufacturing areas has left city cores in a state of
decline and created further spatial discontinuity.
Realising that these urban pressures were impeding
Gauteng’s sustainable development and economic
competitiveness, in 2004 the Provincial Government
rallied the twelve municipalities within its boundaries
to commit to establishing the Gauteng City-Region
(GCR). At the forefront of this challenge was
moving from a sectorial approach of development
to a territorial approach. To begin, the provincial
government established an Integrated Urban Planning
Framework, to guide inclusive, resilient and liveable
urban settlements through spatial integration.
Achieving this required consensus from multiple public
and private stakeholders on the idea that Gauteng
as a city-region would provide more sustainable and
competitive development as compared to a sectorial
approach. Working collaboratively between provincial
and municipal governments, a unified agenda was
establishing, with the view to promote the city-region
concept among stakeholders and abroad.
This was essential to attract investments and lead to
the implementation of key programmes and projects
aimed at transforming the social, economic and spatial
profile of the city-region. It has also paved the way for
the Gauteng Integrated Infrastructure Master Plan,
using spatial data to guide the balanced regional
development and the Municipal Integrated Transport
Plans has led to a ‘golden era’ of transport planning,
with the Gautrain Rapid Rail Link, and various BRT
systems being implemented.
While the expected outcomes of GRC are expected
to be delivered over the long term, some indications
of progress are already being made. Access to basic
services has increased across the region, even when
still experiencing rapid population growth. The
move away from a siloed approach to an integrated
territorial strategy has led to the horizontal and
vertical coordination of public and private actors.
It has also led to increased acknowledgement of,
and investment in the informal economy, with an
economic revitalisation summit being held for 50,000
township enterprises and increased investment from
the procurement budget from 5% to 30%. This
was further supported by the empowered regional
Department of Economic Development (DED) who
used the city region to identify opportunities for
economic growth and job creation, with the “Strategy
for a Developmental Green Economy”. Further
regional institutions have been created to foster
inter-governmental collaboration and to promote the
concept of City-Region, such as the Gauteng City-
Region Observatory (GCRO), which has been integral
in finding and providing data, maps and research
outputs for the better understanding of the city-region
in order to enable informed decision making.

Chattanooga is currently the fourth largest city in
the state of Tennessee, located where the Tennessee
River bisects the Cumberland Plateau. The city has
a population of more than 170,000 inhabitants
and, since 1940, has developed as a hub for
transportation and industry, when it was known as
the Dynamo of Dixie. A share of more than 35% of
jobs in the manufacturing and heavy industry sectors
brought economic prosperity but also environmental
degradation. During the 1980’s serious socio-
economic challenges also arose in Chattanooga,
such as loss of jobs due to de-industrialization,
deterioration of infrastructure, social division and
racial tensions. The city choked with the legacy of old
industry: a derelict waterfront, decaying industrial and
commercial structures, toxic sites, and air pollution
so thick that in 1969, national air pollution officials
called Chattanooga the “worst polluted city” in the
UnitedStates. All this caused a population decline of
more than 10% during the 1980’s.
The city realized the need for a new foundation
for its economy and a social and environmental
transformation and slowly engineered its revival
by building a significant system of participatory
planning. In 1982, a city appointed task force
embraced an ambitious re-examination of the 35
kilometer Tennessee River corridor, by conducting
public meetings throughout the community. The
Lyndhurst Foundation initiated a strategic program
to support Chattanooga’s renewal, establishing an
urban design center to popularize ideas of sustainable
redevelopment.
United States of America, Chattanooga
Restoring Prosperity through Participatory Planning
Author: Michael Elliott, School of City
and Regional Planning, Georgia Institute of
Technology, USA
Chattanooga,USA©Wikipedia/~Lemcke(talk)
At the same time Chattanooga Venture, another
community-based organisation, engaged the full
community in the task of environmental, social
and economic revitalization. Six major strategies
emerged from this process: (1) integrate economic
and community life through the lens of sustainable
development, (2) focus on visible, doable projects that
promote civic leadership and build confidence, (3)
build institutional capacity, (4) invest in human capital
and employment opportunities, (5) invest in social
capital and (6) plan the infrastructure for the future.
After the implementation of these strategies, the city
initiated a larger, regional process to address inter-
jurisdictional coordination.
Chattanooga has undoubtedly influenced its
economic, social and environmental situation through
territorial planning. Substantial governmental and
private resources have been invested in transforming
the downtown, river-front areas, and infrastructures.
As a result, the city’s population has grown and it
has one of the nation’s strongest local economies.
Unemployment has dropped to 10% below the
national average. The city, once famous for its
pollution, is now noted for its sustainable economy.
In 1996, the United Nations Conference on Housing
and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat II
Conference) in Istanbul recognized Chattanooga as
one of the world’s 12 “Best Practice Cities”, earning
also numerous awards for livability, excellence in
housing and consolidated planning.

Authors: Kathryn Bryk Friedman, School of Architecture and Planning, State University of New York, USA
Irena F. Creed, Department of Geography and Earth Sciences,Western University, Canada
WaterfrontparksalongtheStLawrenceRiverattheOld
Port,Montreal©Flickr/bricoleurbanism
The Great Lakes Region is a transboundary space
identified by its single most significant asset – the
Great Lakes St. Lawrence River Basin. The Basin
represents the largest freshwater system on earth,
spanning more than 94,000 square miles (244,000
km2) and containing more than 20 percent of the
world’s freshwater resources. As an ecologic system,
the Basin is highly complex, comprising interrelated
open water, coastal and watershed systems that
support a high level of biological diversity. The Basin
plays a significant role in the economies of the
United States and Canada. Great strides in terms of
ecological restoration have been made since the 1960s
and 1970s, when severe environmental challenges,
including the declaration that Lake Erie was “dead,”
threatened ecological sustainability. Nonetheless, the
Basin remains at tipping point, with a plethora of
ecological and environmental pressures affecting its
security as a resource. As recently as the summer of
2014, algal blooms caused a severe crisis by shutting
down the water supply in Toledo for several days.
With the launch in 2012 of the Great Lakes Futures
Project (GLFP), a new transboundary planning model
emerged that emphasized process and stakeholder
input, rather than institution building, to solve
sustainability challenges. The GLFP was innovative
for two reasons. Firstly it was a grassroots effort
led by higher education researchers and secondly
it used a tool in the transboundary context that is
usually reserved for regional and municipal planning –
scenario analysis. The GLFP scenario analysis spanned
the past 50 years, the present, and the next 50 years
(1963-2063). In order to consider alternative futures,
stakeholders created stories about the future that are
not impossible to achieve by considering the following
questions: What forces are driving changes? What are
the key uncertainties associated with these drivers?
How could these forces diverge the future from its
current path? If the future unfolds as described in
the scenarios, what would we do about it? Over the
course of two years the project engaged more than 50
international Canadian and United States researchers,
together with government and non-government
participants.
The GLFP represents a new model for thinking and
acting at the trans-boundary scale. The tool presented
plausible futures for the region, creating awareness
and consensus regarding the striking environmental
and economy imbalances that will be faced if
appropriate action is not taken. The experience has
delivered an increased capacity for decision makers
and end-users to overcome identified gaps in policy
and to monitor policy effectiveness. Further to this,
new, effective relationships in a transdisciplinary
network of scholars and practitioners developed,
creating partnerships for future research and
engagement. The outcomes of GLFP will contribute to
the long-term goal of ensuring effective policy in the
Great Lakes Region, representing a truly collaborative
strategic planning process not only for the Great Lakes
Region, but also for other transboundary regions
throughout the globe, as some forty percent of the
world’s population live in trans-boundary river and lake
basins.
United States of America and Canada, The Great Lakes
St. Lawrence River Region
Innovative Responses to Trans-Boundary Challenges

Author: Ronald Chimowa, Department of Physical Planning Ministry of Local Government, Public Works and National Housing Harare, Zimbabwe
The Sengwe-Tshipise Corridor is a thin strip of
communal land separating the Gonarezhou National
Park in Zimbabwe, the Limpopo National Park in
Mozambique and the Kruger National Park in South
Africa. Before 2002, uncoordinated management
had resulted in fences separating sovereign territory,
threatening spatial continuity, biodiversity conservation
and effective ecosystem management. In 2002,
Mozambique, South Africa and Zimbabwe signed
a treaty to establish the Great Limpopo Trans-
frontier Park (GLTP) covering 37 572 km² and the
establishment of the Sengwe-Thsipise Wilderness
Corridor (STWC) was a key milestone in its trans-
frontier conservation and collaboration efforts.
The STWC needed to address the diverse interests
and concerns of all stakeholders and communities
across the three countries to ensure the improvement
in economic and environmental conditions. In 2005
a Combination Authority was legally constituted to
prepare a Local Development Plan for the Corridor.
The Authority was in charge of hosting community
sensitization and planning workshops to enhance
the planning and management capacities of the
communities involved. Focused group discussions were
held with all segments of communities involved and a
cultural exchange visit was held with the Makhuleke
Community of South Africa to learn best practices in
natural resource conservation.
LimpopoProvince,SouthAfrica©Flickr/MartinHeigan
These interactions gauged concerns at a multi
stakeholder level and also allowed for initial negative
perceptions of the project to be eased. The activities
led to the formulation of the Corridor development
policies, goals and proposals and the identification of
projects and activities that needed to be implemented
in order to realize the objectives of the Plan with an
integrated and phased approach.
The successful adoption of the STWC has made GLTP
the largest trans-frontier park in the world and has
succeeded in re-establishing endangered wildlife
populations by opening up historic migration routes.
The model example of regional cooperation has
also generated major financial contributions from
development agencies in support of eco-tourism,
employment opportunities and securing the corridor
as a conservation area. Coordinated management has
resulted in reduced maintenance costs while delivering
improved benefits, with the Gonarezhou National
Park reporting a reduction of 80% in the poaching of
wildlife, largely as a result of community awareness
of ecological issues. Finally, community groups have
acknowledged the economic and environmental
benefits of the plan and committed to its successful
implementation. This success of the community-
based planning model has led to the Government of
Zimbabwe internalising the approach, using it as a
template for future community affected development
projects.
Zimbabwe, Mozambique and South Africa - Sengwe-Tshipise
Wilderness Corridor
Community Collaboration on Cross Border Environmental Protection

ANNEXESAnnex 1: Leaflet presenting the IG-UTP Initiative
Annex 2: Fukuoka Communiqué
Annex 3: Current list of draft Case Studies
Annex 4: List of members of the Ad-Hoc Expert Group

Towards the development of
InTernaTIonal GuIdelInes on
urban and TerrITorIal PlannInG
CapeTown,SouthAfrica©Flickr/IanWilson
“We recognize that, if they are well planned and developed, including through integrated
planning and management approaches, cities can promote economically, socially and
environmentally sustainable societies”
The Future We Want, Rio+20 Outcome Document

Why develop International Guidelines on urban and Territorial
Planning?
Different types and approaches of urban and territorial planning exist and have been tested
worldwide without simple and universally agreed principles to guide decision makers
towards sustainable urban development.
The International Guidelines on Urban and Territorial Planning (IG-UTP) intend to constitute
a global framework for improving policies, plans and designs for more compact, socially
inclusive, better integrated and connected cities and territories that foster sustainable
urban development and are resilient to climate change.
The IG-UTP would complement two sets of guidelines previously adopted by the Governing
Council of UN-Habitat: the Guidelines on Decentralization (2007) and the Guidelines on
Access to Basic Services for All (2009), which have been used as a reference in a number
of countries to catalyze policy and institutional reforms and to leverage partnerships.
From national experiences to universal Principles
UN-Habitat established a Group of Experts to support and guide the IG-UTP drafting
process*. Building on national experiences, this Group aims at capturing universal principles
that could support a diversity of planning approaches adapted to different contexts
and scales.
Experts include nominees from national governments, local authorities (eg: UCLG),
development partners (eg:World Bank and OECD), associations of planners (eg:
ISOCARP) research and academia, and civil society organizations from Africa,Asia,
Europe and America.
The Committee of Permanent Representatives to UN-Habitat as well as other United
Nations bodies will be consulted throughout the IG-UTP development process, which has the
following milestones:
• April 2013: Resolution 24/3 of UN-Habitat’s Governing Council
mandating the development of the IG-UTP
• Oct. 2013: First Expert Group Meeting held in Paris, France
• April 2014: Second Expert Group Meeting and UN High-level Inter-Agency
Meeting (briefing of 27 UN agencies) held in Medellin,
Colombia, in conjunction with the 7th World Urban Forum
• Nov. 2014: Third Expert Group Meeting in Fukuoka, Japan
• April 2015: Submission of the IG-UTP to the 25th Governing
Council of UN-Habitat for approval
*with the financial support of France and Japan

Key Principles of the IG-uTP (draft, as of december 2014)
A URBAN POLICY AND GOVERNANCE
1 Urban and Territorial Planning is more than a technical tool; it is an integrative and participatory decision-making
process that addresses competing interests and is linked to a shared vision, an overall development strategy and
national, regional and local urban policies.
2 Urban and Territorial Planning represents a core component of the renewed urban governance paradigm, which
promotes local democracy, participation and inclusion, transparency and accountability, with a view to ensuring
sustainable urbanization and spatial quality.
B URBAN AND TERRITORIAL PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Urban and Territorial Planning and Social Development
3 Urban and Territorial Planning primarily aims to realize adequate standards of living and working conditions for all
segments of current and future societies, ensure equitable distribution of the costs, opportunities and benefits of urban
development and particularly promote social inclusion and cohesion.
4 Urban and Territorial Planning constitutes an essential investment in the future. It is a precondition for a better
quality of life and successful globalization processes that respect cultural heritages and cultural diversity, and for the
recognition of the distinct needs of various groups.
Urban and Territorial Planning and Sustained Economic Growth
5 Urban and Territorial Planning is a catalyst for sustained and inclusive economic growth, that provides an enabling
framework for new economic opportunities, regulation of land and housing markets and timely provision of adequate
infrastructure and basic services.
6 Urban and Territorial Planning constitutes a powerful decision-making mechanism to ensure that sustained economic
growth, social development and environmental sustainability go hand in hand to promote better connectivity at all
territorial levels.
Urban and Territorial Planning and the Environment
7 Urban and Territorial Planning provides a spatial framework to protect and manage the natural and built environment
of cities and territories, including biodiversity, land and natural resources, and to ensure integrated and sustainable
development.
8 Urban and Territorial Planning contributes to increase human security by strengthening environmental and socio-
economic resilience, enhancing mitigation of, and adaptation to, climate change and improving the management of
natural and environmental hazards and risks.
C URBAN AND TERRITORIAL PLANNING COMPONENTS
9 Urban and Territorial Planning combines several spatial, institutional and financial dimensions over a variety of time
frames and geographical scales. It is a continuous and iterative process, grounded in enforceable regulations, that aims
to promote more compact cities and synergies between territories.
10 Urban and Territorial Planning includes spatial planning, which aims to facilitate and articulate political decisions
based on different scenarios. It translates those decisions into actions that will transform the physical and social space
and support the development of integrated cities and territories.
D IMPLEMENTATION OF URBAN AND TERRITORIAL PLANNING
11 Adequate implementation of urban and territorial plans in all their dimensions requires political leadership,
appropriate legal and institutional frameworks, efficient urban management, improved coordination, consensus-
building approaches and reduce duplication of efforts to respond coherently and effectively to current and future
challenges;
12 Effective implementation and evaluation of Urban and Territorial Planning requires, in particular, continuous
monitoring, periodic adjustments and sufficient capacities at all levels, as well as sustainable financial mechanisms
and technologies.
Designed as a reference document, the IG-UTP would promote key urban and territorial
planning principles organized along four main pillars.The IG-UTP will also include
recommendations for the stakeholders involved in urban and territorial planning.

The Evolution of
A Global Overview
National
Urban
Policies
At the beginning of the twenty-first century, urbanization is
undeniably a process that is increasing at a rapid rate with
ever more people moving to urban areas to improve their
lives. The way in which countries have developed policies to
manage this process is the subject of this publication.
Countries from different regions around the world have been
selected to illustrate how context and history can shape an
urban policy. The aim has been to synthesize the different
experiences into useful principles and lessons from which
others can benefit.
All governments should aim to develop sustainable, stable
and functioning cities that can support the millions of people
who gravitate towards them.
United Nations Human Settlements Programme
P.O. Box 30030, Nairobi 00100, KENYA
Telephone: +254-20-7623120, Fax: +254-20-7624266/7
Email: infohabitat@unhabitat.org
HS Number: xxxxx
ISBN Number:xxxxxxx
Achieving sustainable urban development requires that
stakeholders, through a participatory process, foster urban
policies that promote more compact, socially inclusive, better
integrated and connected cities that are resilient to climate
change.
This publication explains some of the elements that are
essential to achieving sustainable urban development.
Historical, contemporary and forward looking perspectives
are provided with concrete examples and good lessons learnt
for all urban policy actors.
This publication will be very useful for urban stakeholders
working on urban policies in the public and private sectors,
civil society organisations, development agencies, research
and capacity development institutions.
The Evolution of
TheEvolutionofNationalUrbanPolicies:AGlobalOverview
A Global Overview
National
Urban
Policies
UN-Habitat (United Nations Human Settlements Programme)
Urban Planning and Design Branch
P.O.BOX30030 Nairobi 00100 Kenya
Tel: +254 20 7625402, Fax: +254 20 7624266/7
updb@unhabitat.org
Contact us
un-Habitat’s Key references on urban and Territorial Planning
urban Patterns for a Green economy,
Set of 4 Guides (2012)
Global report on Human settlements:
Planning sustainable Cities (2009)*
Planned City extensions: analysis of
Historical examples (2015)
The evolution of national urban
Policies: a Global overview (2015)
The preparation of the IG-UTP is expected to contribute to the preparatory process of the
Habitat III Conference, scheduled to take place in June 2016.
Once adopted, UN-Habitat and other development partners may be called upon to support
countries and cities which would consider using the guidelines in their national and
local contexts, draft corresponding regulations and by-laws, and test such normative tools in
concrete planning exercises.
A set of tools could be designed to support the IG-UTP development process which will
have to be monitored and documented. Case studies may also be undertaken to illustrate the
conditions and benefits of the proposed Urban and Territorial Planning approaches.
What’s next?
1
1 2 3
4 5 6
2
3
5
6
4
urban Planning for City leaders (2012)
Citywide strategic Planning, a Step by
Step Guide (2010)
www.unhabitat.org
Feb.2015
Planned City Extensions: Analy-
sis of Historical Examples
The Analysis of Historical Examples of City Extensions
takes a retrospective look at how various cities in the past
have grown and evolved using the approach of planned
city extensions. This retrospective reflection allows us
to draw lessons that only the passage of time can allow;
lessons which can be useful in guiding future urban
growth so as to generate cities that are more sustainable,
socially inclusive, and economically viable.
The analysis examines the development of ten cities
from different parts of the world: rich and poor cities;
cities built in different time periods – from 17th to 21st
century; and at different scale – from neighbourhood
www.unhabitat.org
Planned City Extensions: Analysis of Historical Examples
to city scale.Various aspects of each city related to
physical configuration, process, phasing and regulation
are examined. The analysis results in the following
conclusions:The grid as a basic organizational structure
has proved valid and useful in the development of large
and small cities all around the globe and through all
periods of time; a General Plan with regulations rather
than a Master Plan is proposed because it is more flexible
and can evolve through time; an adequate urban density
is essential in order to create civic life and economic
activity in the city; and variations in the grid structure are
important to remove monotony and create interesting cities.
HS Number: HS/003/15E
ISBN Number: 978-92-1-132639-0
UNITED NATIONS HUMAN SETTLEMENTS PROGRAMME
P.O. Box 30030 00100 Nairobi GPO KENYA
Tel: 254-020-7623120 (Central Office) Email:
urban.planning@unhabitat.org
PlannedCityExtensions:AnalysisofHistoricalExamples

International Guidelines on Urban and Territorial Planning
Fukuoka Communiqué
Fukuoka, Japan 12 November 2014
In response to the UN-Habitat Governing Council Resolution 24/3 of April 2013, the Executive Director of UN-
Habitat established an Ad-Hoc Group of Experts to advise on the structure, content and wording of the proposed
International Guidelines on Urban and Territorial Panning (IG-UTP).
WE, members of this Expert Group were nominated by our respective national governments, associations of local
authorities (United Cities and Local Governments), associations of professional planners (International Society
of City and Regional Planners) and international institutions (World Bank, United Nations Centre for Regional
Development, United Nations Institute for Training and Research, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and
Development), representing experience and practice from Africa, Asia, Europe and America.
WE participated in three Expert Group Meetings (EGM) to carefully review the structure and content of the
Guidelines in Paris, France (24-25 October 2013), Medellin, Colombia (10 April 2014) and Fukuoka, Japan (11-12
November 2014).
WE are pleased to report that this consultative and inclusive process has culminated in an agreed draft of
the International Guidelines on Urban and Territorial Planning that we recommend to be submitted to the
Committee of Permanent Representatives for consideration and subsequent transmission to the 25th session of
the Governing Council scheduled in April 2015.
WE based our recommendations on strong evidence, good practices and lessons learned from different contexts
and at different scales. WE also built on the previous two sets of Guidelines: The International Guidelines on
Decentralization and Strengthening of Local Authorities (2007) and the International Guidelines on Access to
Basic Services for all (2009).
The principles contained in the Guidelines aim at promoting sustainable development of cities and human
settlements, from a social, economic and environmental perspective. Once adopted, the Guidelines are expected
to provide a global framework for improving policies, plans, designs and implementation processes for more
compact, socially inclusive, better integrated and connected cities and territories that foster sustainable urban
development and are resilient to climate change.
WE call on Member States to adopt the Guidelines and encourage countries who are in a position to do so to
consider providing resources to speed up the implementation of the Guidelines and tracking progress in the their
adaptation and use.
WE believe that the Guidelines could be an significant tool to highlight the importance of sustainable
urbanization in the Post-2015 Development Agenda as well as the Third United Nations Conference on Housing
and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III), scheduled to take place in 2016.
WE are grateful to UN-Habitat, the Government of France through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the
Government of Japan through the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, the Prefectural
Government of Fukuoka, the Municipal Government of Fukuoka and Seinan Gakuin University in Fukuoka
for their financial and technical contribution throughout the process of preparation of the Guidelines. WE are
committed, in our respective capacities, to promote and support the implementation of the Guidelines for a
better urban future for all.

Information Document - Towards a Compendium Of Inspiring Practices
Current list of draft Case Studies (46) - As of 30 March 2015
No Geographic Area / Country Focus Area / Key Words
Included in
the sample
1 Argentina, Santa Fe Intermediary Cities, Basic Plans x
2 Australia, Melbourne Climate Change Adaptation, City-wide Planning x
3 Belgium, Ghent Urban Transformation, Port Area x
4 Brazil, Canoas Tool-kit for Public Participation, Participatory Budget
5 Brazil, Maringa Intermediary Cities, Strategic Planning
6 Brazil, Porto Alegre Participatory Budget, Social Inclusion x
7 Burkina Faso, Ouagadougou City Development Strategy, Strategic Planning x
8 Cameroon, Douala City Development Strategy, Strategic Planning x
9 Canada, Greater Toronto Area Food Security, Metropolitan Planning x
10 Canada & United States of America, Great
Lakes St Lawrence Region
Blue Corridor, Trans-boundary Planning
x
11 China, Shenzhen Special Economic Zone, Long-term Strategy x
12 China, Yangtze River Delta Special Economic Zone, Regional Planning x
13 Colombia, Medellin Urban Transformation, Social Inclusion x
14 Egypt, Greater Cairo Region Urban Transformation, Metropolitan Planning x
15 Europe, ESPON Supra-National Integration, Policy-making
16 Europe, Leipzig Charter Supra-National Integration, Guiding Framework x
17 France, Lyon Urban Transformation, Social Inclusion x
18 France, Rennes Urban-Rural Linkages, Regional Planning
19 France and Germany, Strasbourg-Kehl City-to-city Cooperation, Trans-boundary Planning x
20 Georgia, Tbilisi Urban Revitalization, Participatory Planning
21 Germany, Bremen, Leipzig, Nuremberg City-to-city Cooperation Platform, National Policies
22 Germany, Rhine-Ruhr Urban Transformation, Metropolitan Planning x
23 Haiti, Port au Prince Post-disaster Planning, Multi-stakeholders Coordination x
24 India, Ahmedabad Urban Mobility, Social Inclusion x
25 Indonesia, Surabaya Green Development, City-wide Planning x
26 Japan, Fukuoka Compact City, Integrated Planning x
27 Japan, Sendai Disaster Risk Reduction, City-wide Planning
28 Morocco Affordable Housing, New Towns x
29 Morocco, Ouarzazate Solar Energy, Local Economic Development
30 Mozambique, Lichinga Intermediary Cities, Basic Plans x
31 Mozambique, South Africa, Zimbabwe,
Sengwe-Tshipise Wilderness Corridor
Biodiversity Corridor, Trans-boundary Planning
x
32 Namibia, Swakopmund Strategic Planning, Basic Services Delivery
33 New Zealand, Christchurch Post-disaster Planning, National Policies
34 Norway Climate Change Adaptation, National Policies x
35 Norway, Kristiansand Design Guidelines, City-wide Planning
36 Philippines, Sorsogon Disaster Risk Reduction, City-wide Planning
37 Russia, Krasnoyarsk Urban Transformation, Urban Paradigm Shift x
38 Russia Yekaterinburg Land Use Planning, Urban Reform x
39 South Africa, Warwick Public Space, Local Economic Development
40 South Africa, Gauteng City-region, Multi-stakeholders Coordination x
41 South Africa, Theewaterskloof Participatory Planning, Basic Services Delivery
42 Spain, Barcelona Planned City Extension, Metropolitan Planning
43 United States of America, Atlanta Neighbourhood Planning
44 United States of America, Chattanooga Urban Transformation, Economic Development x
45 United States of America, Portland Water Management, City-wide Planning
46 Zimbabwe, Masvingo Community-based Planning, Social Inclusion

International Guidelines on Urban and Territorial Planning
List of members of the Ad-Hoc Expert Group
No Country Name Institution Designation
1 Belgium Mr Joris Scheers Flemish Sustainable Cities, KULeuven
University, Department of Architecture
and Urbanism
Professor
2 Brazil Mr Edesio Fernandes University College London Professor
3 China Mr Shi Nan Urban Planning Society of China Secretary General
4 France Mrs Brigitte Bariol-Mathais French Federation of Urban Planning
Agencies (FNAU)
General Manager
5 Germany Ms Elke Pahl-Weber Technical University Berlin Head of School of Urban and Regional
Planning
6 Germany Mr Andre Mueller Federal Office for Building and
Regional Planning (BBR)
Research Coordinator & Senior Adviser
7 Ghana Mr Samuel Seth Passah Ministry of Local Government Rural
Development
Senior Development Planning Officer
8 Indonesia Mr Imam Ernawi Ministry of Public Works Director General of Human Settlements
9 Japan Mr Toshiyasu Noda Seinan Gakuin University Fukuoka Professor, Department of Law
10 Morocco Mr Hassan Radoine National School of Architecture, Rabat Director
11 Norway Mrs Hilde Moe Ministry for Local Government and
Modernisation
Senior Advisor, Department of Planning
12 Tanzania Mrs Sarah Alphonce Kyessi Ministry of Lands, Housing and Human
Settlements Development
Principle Town Planner and Assistant
Director of Settlements Regularization
13 Uganda Mr Savino Katsigaire Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban
Development
Director, Physical Planning and Urban
Development
14 Zimbabwe Mr Ronald Chimowa Department of Physical Planning,
Zimbabwe
Chief Planning Officer
15 Cities Alliance Mr Serge Allou Cities Alliance Senior Urban Specialist
16 CAP (South Africa) Mrs Christine Platt Commonwealth Association of
Planners (CAP)
President and CEO
17 Enda Tiers Monde
(Senegal)
Mr Mamadou Bachir Kanouté Enda Tiers Monde, Dakar Executive Coordinator
18 FIABCI (Brazil) Mr Flávio Gonzaga Bellegarde
Nunes
International Real Estate Federation
(FIABCI)
Former World President of FIABCI
19 GRET (France) Mrs Virginie Rachmuhl GRET, Paris Head of Urban Development Division
20 ISOCARP (China) Mr Hongyang Wang International Society of City and
Regional Planners (ISOCARP)
Professor of Urban and Territorial
Planning, Nanjing University
21 ISOCARP (India) Mrs Shipra Narang Suri International Society of City and
Vice-president of ISOCARP
22 ISOCARP
(Netherlands)
Mr Andries Geerse International Society of City and
Principal, We love the City
23 OECD Mr Tadashi Matsumoto Organization for Economic Co-
operation and Development (OECD)
Senior Policy Analyst, Division of Regional
Policies for Sustainable Development
24 Regional Studies
Association (UK)
Mr Gordon Dabinett Regional Studies Association Department of Town & Regional
Planning, University of Sheffield
25 UCLG Mrs Sara Hoeflich United Cities and Local Governments
(UCLG)
World secretariat UCLG
26 UCLG (Brazil) Mrs Maria Regina Rau de Souza City of Porto Alegre, Brazil Architect & Urban Planner
27 UCLG (Spain) Mr Josep Maria Llop Lleida University, Spain Head of Intermediary Cities Network
28 UCLG (South
Africa)
Mrs Subhatri Moonsammy City of Durban eThekwini, South Africa Head of planning
29 UNCRD Mrs Chikako Takase United Nations Centre for Regional
Development (UNCRD)
Director
30 UN-Habitat Daniel Biau Former DED, UN-Habitat Senior Consultant
31 UNITAR Mr Berin McKenzie United Nations Institute for Training
and Research (UNITAR)
Specialist
32 University Network
Initiative (Egypt)
Mrs Sahar Attia Cairo University Head of the Department of Architecture-
Faculty of Engineering
33 University Network
Initiative (USA)
Mr Bruce Stiftel Georgia Institute of Technology, United
States of America
Professor of City and Regional Planning
and Chair of School of City and Regional
Planning
34 World Bank Mrs Ellen Hamilton World Bank (WB) Lead Urban Specialist, Land and Housing

UN-Habitat (United Nations Human Settlements Programme)
Urban Planning and Design Branch
P.O.BOX30030 Nairobi 00100 Kenya
Tel: +254 20 7625402, Fax: +254 20 7624266/7
updb@unhabitat.org
www.unhabitat.org
Expert Group Meeting in Fukuoka, Japan © UN-Habitat

Compendium of Inspiring Practices: sample of an on-going, larger and open initiative to document inspirational and international experiences on Urban and Territorial Planning that illustrates the Guidelines….

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to Compendium of Inspiring Practices: sample of an on-going, larger and open initiative to document inspirational and international experiences on Urban and Territorial Planning that illustrates the Guidelines…. (20)

More from Graciela Mariani (20)

Compendium of Inspiring Practices: sample of an on-going, larger and open initiative to document inspirational and international experiences on Urban and Territorial Planning that illustrates the Guidelines….