SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1
IMP/IMS Overview
Glen B Alleman
glen.alleman@Niwotridge.com
IMP/IMS - 2/19
Integrated Management Framework
Statement of Work (SOW)
User requirements decomposed from RFP
• Event-driven plan for entire program
• Product and Process Sections
Determined by
performance
• Guidance usually in RFP
• Tailored to contractor’s program / products
• Provides single numbering system for entire program
• Contractor generated. Based on SOW
• Guidance provided in RFP
IMS • Expands IMP, Provides timing
Links cost to
IMS thru WBS
PLACED
ON
CONTRACT
USED TO
TRACK
PERFORMANCE
USED TO REPORT
PERFORMANCE
Technical Requirements
WBS
CPARS
Technical Performance Measures
Process Metrics
• Process quality measures
Earned Value Management System (EVMS)
Integrated Master Plan (IMP)
IMP/IMS - 3/19
What’s the objective of all this formality?
Objective è Implementation
Event driven plan versus a
schedule driven plan based on
completion of tasks
è Separate plan (IMP) from schedule
(IMS) but link elements with
numbering system
Condensed, easy to read “plan”
showing “events” rather than
effort
è Indentured, outline format (not
text)
Pre-defined entry and exit
conditions for major program
events
è Significant accomplishments (SA)
for each key event (submitted in
proposal)
Objective measure of progress/
completion for each
accomplishment
è Pre–defined accomplishment
criteria (AC) for each SA
Stable, contractual plan flexible
enough to portray program status
è IMP is part of contract, IMS is data
item
Capture essence of functional
processes without mandating a
particular process
è Split IMP into Product and Process
sections
IMP/IMS - 4/19
Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule
l Integrated Master Plan (IMP) – provides a single plan
describing the fundamental structure of the program
l Focuses the integrated product team (IPT) team on the
customer requirements through deliverables rather than
through tasks
l Establishes an agreement between all members of the IPT
on these deliverables
l Defines the program in terms of events, accomplishments,
and criteria for these accomplishments
l Establishes the criteria and objectives for program success
l Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) – provides a task and
calendar based schedule at a level necessary for day–to–
execution of the program
IMP/IMS - 5/19
IMP / IMS Assembled From RFP
Requirement WBS Element SOW Task
System Specification
1000 Spacecraft
1100 Avionics
Ground Link
§3.1 Structure (WBS1000)
Design, develop, produce
and verify a complete
spacecraft containing
avionics, propulsion and
other installed equipment.
Integrated Master Plan (IMP)
2004 2005 2006
Program Events PDR CDR
1. Preliminary Design Complete
2. Duty Cycle Defined
Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)
Management Plan Events Accomplishment Criteria
1. Preliminary Design Review PDR 1. a. Duty cycle defined
b. Preliminary analysis complete
1000 Spacecraft
1100 Avionics
1110 Ground Link
.
.
11n0 Avionics
IMP/IMS - 6/19
Simple Overview of the IMP/IMS Relationship
-
-
-
-
SYSTEM XX
Integrated Master Plan
(IMP)
Integrated Master Schedule
(IMS)
ID Task Name Duration Start
1 A01a Needs Analysis
Complete
56h 6/1/94
2 A.01a01 Assign Project
Leader
1d 6/1/94
3 A. 01a02 Perform Needs
Analysis
3d 6/2/94
4 A.01a03 Develop Functional Reqmts1d 6/7/94
5 A.01a04 Present Functional
Requirements
1d 6/8/94
6 A.01a05 Functional Requirements
Approval
1d 6/9/94
7 A01b Plan/Organization Complete32h 6/10/94
8 A01b01 Or ganize Project Team 1d 6/10/94
9 A01b02 Complete Team Contacts
Worksheet
1d 6/13/94
10 A01b03 Develop Project Timeline 1d 6/14/94
11 A01b04 Obtain Authorization for
Resources
1d 6/15/94
12 A01c Project Plan Complete 16h 6/16/94
13 A 01c01 Develop Project Plan
Document
1d 6/16/94
14 A01c02 Signoff Plan by Proj ect
Team
1d 6/17/94
15 A01d Project Plan Approved 16h 6/20/94
16 A.01d01 Present Plan Management1d 6/20/94
17 A01d02 Approve the
Plan
1d 6/21/94
18 A01e Project Start-up Announcement8h 6/22/94
19 A01e01 Distribute Approved
Plan
1d 6/22/94
20 A01e02 Issue Site Communication
Memo
1d 6/22/94
M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T
May 22, '9 4 May 29, '94 Jun 5, '94 Jun 12, '94 Ju
• Event based Plan
• Contractual document
• Relatively top level
• Task & calendar based Schedule
• Level of detail necessary for
day-to-day execution
SYSTEM XX
Integrated Master Plan (IMP)
ProcessesEvent
Accomplishments Reference
( Criteria
PDR
Integration planning completed
F 16 ACA completed
B 52 ACA completed
B 2 ACA completed
B 1 ACA compl eted
Integrated Master Plan (IMP)
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Event Definitions
IMP/IMS - 7/19
Example IMP
Activity # Event
Ê Significant Accomplishment (SA)
Ê Accomplishment Criteria (AC)
WBS
Reference
E Event E – GN&C Flight Units Complete
E01
ÊRelease 1 Flight Production Complete
—
E01a
Ê Release 1 Subassemblies Complete
1.1.2.2
E01b
Ê Release 1 Assembly/Integration/Test
1.1.2.2
E02
Ê Release 1a Flight Production Complete
—
E02a
Ê Release 1a Subassembly complete
1.1.2.4
E02B
Ê Release 1a ATLO
1.1.2.4
IMP/IMS - 8/19
Program Events
l Program Events are assessment points which occur at the
conclusion of significant program activities
l Events are key transition points in the program
– Key points of maturation
– Major product deliveries
– Test and integration points
– Key decision points
l Events are points on the program schedule where the
“entire” program team – customer included – reach
agreement on the status of the program.
– They represent either the beginning or end of integrated program
team activities
– Key tasks or accomplishments yield evidence that the work is
moving forward at an acceptable pace
IMP/IMS - 9/19
Components of an Event
l Events defined in an “event dictionary”
– Name of the event
– Purpose of the event
– What review the event includes
– Expectations at this point in time
Event 1 – Systems Requirements Review (SRR)
Purpose: Ascertain the technical direction of Delivery Order to ensure technical
compliance to user needs. Ensure risk and other management programs and plans are
effectively in place and the organization is functioning as an IPPD team
Includes: review of Pre-contract risk reduction effort; Post Award Conference and
initial working group meetings; program requirements; program management controls;
initial HWCI/CSCIs; functional baseline; risk assessment; and cost, schedule, technical,
and unit cost performance.
Expectations: Common understanding of all key contract elements (CLINs, schedules,
etc.) and a clear well defined requirements baseline for subsequent system development
IMP/IMS - 10/19
Event / Accomplishment Evaluation Criteria
l Do the Events and Accomplishments reflect the logical
evolution and progress of the Program?
– Do the events demonstrate the maturity of the program over its life?
– Do the Accomplishments and Criteria identify meaningful and
measurable progress toward key goals?
l Do the Accomplishments of each Event demonstrate an
understanding of the requirements or are they simply
generic tasks?
– Do these accomplishments reflect the Statement of Work?
l Does the IMP structure map to the IPT structure so each IPT
member knows their scope of responsibility?
l Is visibility provided to track risk and risk mitigation steps?
l After award, can the Accomplishments be used as activity
cost accounts for the EVMS system?
IMP/IMS - 11/19
Significant Accomplishments (SA)
l Significant Accomplishments are the desired results prior
to or at the completion of an event that indicate a level of
the program's progress.
l Shows completion or result of a discrete step in the work
process
l Is relevant and logically linked to an “event”
l Uses consistent language, style and format
– This is a critical issue and a standard dictionary of verbs is needed
IMP/IMS - 12/19
Accomplishment Criteria (AC)
l Accomplishment Criteria provide the definitive evidence
that a specific accomplishment has been completed
l Accomplishment Criteria must:
– Measure success or product maturity over time
– Provide objective, explicit proof of completion
– Highlight specific areas of effort for tracking, monitoring risk, or
incrementally verifying a process of product
– Relate directly to accomplishments
– Answer “how do I know when a accomplishment has been
completed”
– Focus of exit criteria
– Express entrance criteria as predecessors in the IMS
IMP/IMS - 13/19
Tasks
l Tasks are time phased, detailed activities (where work is
accomplished and funds are expended) required to support
the IMP criteria and accomplishments
l Tasks are broken down from the Event Criteria
– Tasks broken down into sub–tasks
– The sum of all the tasks covers all the Contractor WBS Dictionary,
Statement of Work and other contractual requirements
– ONLY durations, predecessors and lags – no dates
l For each Task
– Lag or % – SS+50%
– Rationale for duration and predecessors in dependency link
described in the notes field
– Resources for each task used for Basis of Estimate
IMP/IMS - 14/19
IMS Development within the IPT
IMS Critical Path Analysis, Baseline, Monitor, Update
Define IMS tasks/activities, durations and dependencies
Combine, consolidate, refine across program
IMP Key Events (RFP + unique)
“Product Tree” Systems Engineering IPT & other AITs
IPT Structure WBS Structure
Each IPT defines SAs & ACs for their WBS elements
May Need
Multiple
Iterations
IMP/IMS - 15/19
Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)
l Integrated, networked, multi–layer schedule of activities
needed to achieve the contractual objectives
l Detailed tasks to be completed
l Networked schedule will all dependent tasks linked
– Task numbering correlates IMS with Project IMP
– Both Gantt and Network provided
l Critical path identified and analysis of schedule slack
– Used during execution to track progress to plan
l Layering allows different levels of detail to be shown
l Resource loading should match EVMS
IMP/IMS - 16/19
Constructing an IMS
l The IMS is built as a iterative process between the IPT
members
– Detailed task identification takes place through an IMP/IMS Point of
Contact (POC) using the WBS dictionary
– PM-100 requires “activities in the detailed networks should be
generally be no longer than twenty (20) working days in duration”
– Level of Effort tasks should avoid “grabbing” the critical path, by
keeping the completion dates of LOE short of the program end date
l Task constraints must be “well formed”
– “Must Finish On,” “Finish No Later Than,” and “Start No Later Than”
constraints should be avoided since they do not support credible
risk assessment and given unreliable results in a statistical risk
assessment
– Hard constraints from the government should not be carried as
hard constraints in the IMS
IMP/IMS - 17/19
Task Relationships
l Finish-to-Start (FS) – the standard “one task must finish
before another starts” link:
– A test cannot begin until test procedures are written.
l Start-to-Start (SS) - this is used when one task cannot start
until another starts (often involves some lag time)
– A test is scheduled for four weeks, but gathering test results begins
1 week after the start of the tests
l Finish-to-Finish (FF) - appropriate where only task
completion (but not the start) is driven by another task
– The design could start anytime, but can’t complete until 1 month
after environmental results are available
l Start-to-Finish (SF) - used for administrative-type tasks you
want driven by another task
– Preparing the agenda two weeks prior to a review
IMP/IMS - 18/19
Maintaining the IMS Post–Award
l For the IMS
– Criteria for IMS changes should be clerarly satted
– Coordination process for changes documented
– Key contract dates may be impacted
– Ensure changes are monitored and distributed to IPT members
– Monitor linkage to IMP and other management tools (EVMS)
l For IMP
– IMP requires contract modification to implement changes
– Minor changes to IMP may not impact contract
IMP/IMS - 19/19
Summary
l IMP/IMS approach is a disciplined approach for planning,
organizing and managing a program
l IMP is a contractual roadmap for the entire program
l IMS is a key tool for monitoring program progress
l These are complex, expensive documents, that force the
contractor to plan essentials of program
l In order to maximize their usefulness after award they need
to be developed and maintained with care
l The “trick” is balancing detail with ease-of-use with
contract compliance

More Related Content

PDF
A Guide for Capital Project Mamnagers
PDF
Integrated Master Plan and Integrated Master Schedule
PDF
Improving Project Performance in the DOE
PDF
Deliverables based planning handbook
PPTX
From WBS to Integrated Master Schedule
PDF
Integrating cost, schedule, and technical performance
PDF
Heliotropic Abundance
PDF
What Makes a Good Concept of Operations?
A Guide for Capital Project Mamnagers
Integrated Master Plan and Integrated Master Schedule
Improving Project Performance in the DOE
Deliverables based planning handbook
From WBS to Integrated Master Schedule
Integrating cost, schedule, and technical performance
Heliotropic Abundance
What Makes a Good Concept of Operations?

What's hot (20)

DOC
The Role of the Architect in ERP and PDM System Deployment
PDF
IMP / IMS Step by Step
PDF
EVM+Agile the darkside
PDF
The 5 Immutable principles of project management
PPTX
WBS is Paramount
PDF
SOLVING PROJECT ALLOCATION RESOURCE PROBLEMS WITH AEROSPACE ERP
PDF
Project Management Theory
PPTX
CMMI and Agile
PPTX
Getting To Done - A Master Class Workshop
PPTX
5 Immutable Principles of Capital Project SUccess
PDF
Process Flow and Narrative for Agile
PDF
Measures of Effectiveness, Measures of Performance, Technical Performance Mea...
PDF
Risk Management Processes (v2)
PDF
Brownfields agile draft v11
PDF
Increasing the Probability of Project Success with Five Principles and Practices
PDF
Build an integrated master plan and integrated master
PPT
Earned value, XP and government contracts
PDF
Building the Performance Measurement Baseline
PDF
Capabilities based planning
PDF
Scrum Lifecycle At Enterprise Levels
The Role of the Architect in ERP and PDM System Deployment
IMP / IMS Step by Step
EVM+Agile the darkside
The 5 Immutable principles of project management
WBS is Paramount
SOLVING PROJECT ALLOCATION RESOURCE PROBLEMS WITH AEROSPACE ERP
Project Management Theory
CMMI and Agile
Getting To Done - A Master Class Workshop
5 Immutable Principles of Capital Project SUccess
Process Flow and Narrative for Agile
Measures of Effectiveness, Measures of Performance, Technical Performance Mea...
Risk Management Processes (v2)
Brownfields agile draft v11
Increasing the Probability of Project Success with Five Principles and Practices
Build an integrated master plan and integrated master
Earned value, XP and government contracts
Building the Performance Measurement Baseline
Capabilities based planning
Scrum Lifecycle At Enterprise Levels
Ad

Similar to IMP IMS overview (20)

PDF
How to build a credible performance measurement baseline (v5)
PDF
The integrated master plan and integrated master schedule
PPTX
Using Technical Performance Progress
PDF
Integrated Master Plan Development
PDF
Integrated Agile Software Development with Earned Value Management
PDF
Technical Performance Measures
PDF
Focus on the nine I's (v9)
PPTX
IMP & WBS - Getting Both Right is Paramount
PPTX
Se 381 - lec 25 - 32 - 12 may29 - program size and cost estimation models
PPT
Earned value
PPTX
Lec_6_Sosssssftwaaaaaare_Estimation.pptx
PPTX
Software Engineering Fundamentals in Computer Science
PDF
Improving DOE Project Performance Using the DOD Integrated Master Plan
PPTX
Cocomo ( cot constrictive model) and capability maturity model
PPT
SW_Cost_Estimation.ppt
PPTX
Stefanini.trinh
PDF
Vanessa.jeff
PDF
Integrating Agile and Earned Value Management
PDF
Earned Value Management and Agile
PPTX
PS Module Overview
How to build a credible performance measurement baseline (v5)
The integrated master plan and integrated master schedule
Using Technical Performance Progress
Integrated Master Plan Development
Integrated Agile Software Development with Earned Value Management
Technical Performance Measures
Focus on the nine I's (v9)
IMP & WBS - Getting Both Right is Paramount
Se 381 - lec 25 - 32 - 12 may29 - program size and cost estimation models
Earned value
Lec_6_Sosssssftwaaaaaare_Estimation.pptx
Software Engineering Fundamentals in Computer Science
Improving DOE Project Performance Using the DOD Integrated Master Plan
Cocomo ( cot constrictive model) and capability maturity model
SW_Cost_Estimation.ppt
Stefanini.trinh
Vanessa.jeff
Integrating Agile and Earned Value Management
Earned Value Management and Agile
PS Module Overview
Ad

More from Glen Alleman (20)

PDF
Managing risk with deliverables planning
PDF
A Gentle Introduction to the IMP/IMS
PDF
Increasing the Probability of Project Success
PDF
Process Flow and Narrative for Agile+PPM
PDF
Practices of risk management
PDF
Principles of Risk Management
PDF
Deliverables Based Planning, PMBOK® and 5 Immutable Principles of Project Suc...
PDF
From Principles to Strategies for Systems Engineering
PDF
NAVAIR Integrated Master Schedule Guide guide
PDF
Building a Credible Performance Measurement Baseline
PDF
Integrated master plan methodology (v2)
PDF
DHS - Using functions points to estimate agile development programs (v2)
PDF
Making the impossible possible
PPTX
Program Management Office Lean Software Development and Six Sigma
PDF
Policy and Procedure Rollout
PDF
Integrated Master Plan Development
PDF
Seven Habits of a Highly Effective agile project manager
PDF
Paradigm of agile project management (update)
PDF
Writing Proposal Text
PDF
Assessing Enterprise Project Risk
Managing risk with deliverables planning
A Gentle Introduction to the IMP/IMS
Increasing the Probability of Project Success
Process Flow and Narrative for Agile+PPM
Practices of risk management
Principles of Risk Management
Deliverables Based Planning, PMBOK® and 5 Immutable Principles of Project Suc...
From Principles to Strategies for Systems Engineering
NAVAIR Integrated Master Schedule Guide guide
Building a Credible Performance Measurement Baseline
Integrated master plan methodology (v2)
DHS - Using functions points to estimate agile development programs (v2)
Making the impossible possible
Program Management Office Lean Software Development and Six Sigma
Policy and Procedure Rollout
Integrated Master Plan Development
Seven Habits of a Highly Effective agile project manager
Paradigm of agile project management (update)
Writing Proposal Text
Assessing Enterprise Project Risk

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Spectral efficient network and resource selection model in 5G networks
PDF
Reach Out and Touch Someone: Haptics and Empathic Computing
PDF
Peak of Data & AI Encore- AI for Metadata and Smarter Workflows
PDF
How UI/UX Design Impacts User Retention in Mobile Apps.pdf
PDF
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
PPTX
KOM of Painting work and Equipment Insulation REV00 update 25-dec.pptx
PDF
Network Security Unit 5.pdf for BCA BBA.
PPTX
MYSQL Presentation for SQL database connectivity
PDF
Modernizing your data center with Dell and AMD
PDF
Advanced methodologies resolving dimensionality complications for autism neur...
PDF
Per capita expenditure prediction using model stacking based on satellite ima...
PPTX
A Presentation on Artificial Intelligence
PDF
Electronic commerce courselecture one. Pdf
PPTX
Big Data Technologies - Introduction.pptx
PDF
Shreyas Phanse Resume: Experienced Backend Engineer | Java • Spring Boot • Ka...
PPTX
Detection-First SIEM: Rule Types, Dashboards, and Threat-Informed Strategy
PDF
Review of recent advances in non-invasive hemoglobin estimation
PDF
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25 Week I
PPT
“AI and Expert System Decision Support & Business Intelligence Systems”
PDF
cuic standard and advanced reporting.pdf
Spectral efficient network and resource selection model in 5G networks
Reach Out and Touch Someone: Haptics and Empathic Computing
Peak of Data & AI Encore- AI for Metadata and Smarter Workflows
How UI/UX Design Impacts User Retention in Mobile Apps.pdf
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
KOM of Painting work and Equipment Insulation REV00 update 25-dec.pptx
Network Security Unit 5.pdf for BCA BBA.
MYSQL Presentation for SQL database connectivity
Modernizing your data center with Dell and AMD
Advanced methodologies resolving dimensionality complications for autism neur...
Per capita expenditure prediction using model stacking based on satellite ima...
A Presentation on Artificial Intelligence
Electronic commerce courselecture one. Pdf
Big Data Technologies - Introduction.pptx
Shreyas Phanse Resume: Experienced Backend Engineer | Java • Spring Boot • Ka...
Detection-First SIEM: Rule Types, Dashboards, and Threat-Informed Strategy
Review of recent advances in non-invasive hemoglobin estimation
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25 Week I
“AI and Expert System Decision Support & Business Intelligence Systems”
cuic standard and advanced reporting.pdf

IMP IMS overview

  • 1. 1 IMP/IMS Overview Glen B Alleman glen.alleman@Niwotridge.com
  • 2. IMP/IMS - 2/19 Integrated Management Framework Statement of Work (SOW) User requirements decomposed from RFP • Event-driven plan for entire program • Product and Process Sections Determined by performance • Guidance usually in RFP • Tailored to contractor’s program / products • Provides single numbering system for entire program • Contractor generated. Based on SOW • Guidance provided in RFP IMS • Expands IMP, Provides timing Links cost to IMS thru WBS PLACED ON CONTRACT USED TO TRACK PERFORMANCE USED TO REPORT PERFORMANCE Technical Requirements WBS CPARS Technical Performance Measures Process Metrics • Process quality measures Earned Value Management System (EVMS) Integrated Master Plan (IMP)
  • 3. IMP/IMS - 3/19 What’s the objective of all this formality? Objective è Implementation Event driven plan versus a schedule driven plan based on completion of tasks è Separate plan (IMP) from schedule (IMS) but link elements with numbering system Condensed, easy to read “plan” showing “events” rather than effort è Indentured, outline format (not text) Pre-defined entry and exit conditions for major program events è Significant accomplishments (SA) for each key event (submitted in proposal) Objective measure of progress/ completion for each accomplishment è Pre–defined accomplishment criteria (AC) for each SA Stable, contractual plan flexible enough to portray program status è IMP is part of contract, IMS is data item Capture essence of functional processes without mandating a particular process è Split IMP into Product and Process sections
  • 4. IMP/IMS - 4/19 Integrated Master Plan / Integrated Master Schedule l Integrated Master Plan (IMP) – provides a single plan describing the fundamental structure of the program l Focuses the integrated product team (IPT) team on the customer requirements through deliverables rather than through tasks l Establishes an agreement between all members of the IPT on these deliverables l Defines the program in terms of events, accomplishments, and criteria for these accomplishments l Establishes the criteria and objectives for program success l Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) – provides a task and calendar based schedule at a level necessary for day–to– execution of the program
  • 5. IMP/IMS - 5/19 IMP / IMS Assembled From RFP Requirement WBS Element SOW Task System Specification 1000 Spacecraft 1100 Avionics Ground Link §3.1 Structure (WBS1000) Design, develop, produce and verify a complete spacecraft containing avionics, propulsion and other installed equipment. Integrated Master Plan (IMP) 2004 2005 2006 Program Events PDR CDR 1. Preliminary Design Complete 2. Duty Cycle Defined Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) Management Plan Events Accomplishment Criteria 1. Preliminary Design Review PDR 1. a. Duty cycle defined b. Preliminary analysis complete 1000 Spacecraft 1100 Avionics 1110 Ground Link . . 11n0 Avionics
  • 6. IMP/IMS - 6/19 Simple Overview of the IMP/IMS Relationship - - - - SYSTEM XX Integrated Master Plan (IMP) Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) ID Task Name Duration Start 1 A01a Needs Analysis Complete 56h 6/1/94 2 A.01a01 Assign Project Leader 1d 6/1/94 3 A. 01a02 Perform Needs Analysis 3d 6/2/94 4 A.01a03 Develop Functional Reqmts1d 6/7/94 5 A.01a04 Present Functional Requirements 1d 6/8/94 6 A.01a05 Functional Requirements Approval 1d 6/9/94 7 A01b Plan/Organization Complete32h 6/10/94 8 A01b01 Or ganize Project Team 1d 6/10/94 9 A01b02 Complete Team Contacts Worksheet 1d 6/13/94 10 A01b03 Develop Project Timeline 1d 6/14/94 11 A01b04 Obtain Authorization for Resources 1d 6/15/94 12 A01c Project Plan Complete 16h 6/16/94 13 A 01c01 Develop Project Plan Document 1d 6/16/94 14 A01c02 Signoff Plan by Proj ect Team 1d 6/17/94 15 A01d Project Plan Approved 16h 6/20/94 16 A.01d01 Present Plan Management1d 6/20/94 17 A01d02 Approve the Plan 1d 6/21/94 18 A01e Project Start-up Announcement8h 6/22/94 19 A01e01 Distribute Approved Plan 1d 6/22/94 20 A01e02 Issue Site Communication Memo 1d 6/22/94 M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T May 22, '9 4 May 29, '94 Jun 5, '94 Jun 12, '94 Ju • Event based Plan • Contractual document • Relatively top level • Task & calendar based Schedule • Level of detail necessary for day-to-day execution SYSTEM XX Integrated Master Plan (IMP) ProcessesEvent Accomplishments Reference ( Criteria PDR Integration planning completed F 16 ACA completed B 52 ACA completed B 2 ACA completed B 1 ACA compl eted Integrated Master Plan (IMP) 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Event Definitions
  • 7. IMP/IMS - 7/19 Example IMP Activity # Event Ê Significant Accomplishment (SA) Ê Accomplishment Criteria (AC) WBS Reference E Event E – GN&C Flight Units Complete E01 ÊRelease 1 Flight Production Complete — E01a Ê Release 1 Subassemblies Complete 1.1.2.2 E01b Ê Release 1 Assembly/Integration/Test 1.1.2.2 E02 Ê Release 1a Flight Production Complete — E02a Ê Release 1a Subassembly complete 1.1.2.4 E02B Ê Release 1a ATLO 1.1.2.4
  • 8. IMP/IMS - 8/19 Program Events l Program Events are assessment points which occur at the conclusion of significant program activities l Events are key transition points in the program – Key points of maturation – Major product deliveries – Test and integration points – Key decision points l Events are points on the program schedule where the “entire” program team – customer included – reach agreement on the status of the program. – They represent either the beginning or end of integrated program team activities – Key tasks or accomplishments yield evidence that the work is moving forward at an acceptable pace
  • 9. IMP/IMS - 9/19 Components of an Event l Events defined in an “event dictionary” – Name of the event – Purpose of the event – What review the event includes – Expectations at this point in time Event 1 – Systems Requirements Review (SRR) Purpose: Ascertain the technical direction of Delivery Order to ensure technical compliance to user needs. Ensure risk and other management programs and plans are effectively in place and the organization is functioning as an IPPD team Includes: review of Pre-contract risk reduction effort; Post Award Conference and initial working group meetings; program requirements; program management controls; initial HWCI/CSCIs; functional baseline; risk assessment; and cost, schedule, technical, and unit cost performance. Expectations: Common understanding of all key contract elements (CLINs, schedules, etc.) and a clear well defined requirements baseline for subsequent system development
  • 10. IMP/IMS - 10/19 Event / Accomplishment Evaluation Criteria l Do the Events and Accomplishments reflect the logical evolution and progress of the Program? – Do the events demonstrate the maturity of the program over its life? – Do the Accomplishments and Criteria identify meaningful and measurable progress toward key goals? l Do the Accomplishments of each Event demonstrate an understanding of the requirements or are they simply generic tasks? – Do these accomplishments reflect the Statement of Work? l Does the IMP structure map to the IPT structure so each IPT member knows their scope of responsibility? l Is visibility provided to track risk and risk mitigation steps? l After award, can the Accomplishments be used as activity cost accounts for the EVMS system?
  • 11. IMP/IMS - 11/19 Significant Accomplishments (SA) l Significant Accomplishments are the desired results prior to or at the completion of an event that indicate a level of the program's progress. l Shows completion or result of a discrete step in the work process l Is relevant and logically linked to an “event” l Uses consistent language, style and format – This is a critical issue and a standard dictionary of verbs is needed
  • 12. IMP/IMS - 12/19 Accomplishment Criteria (AC) l Accomplishment Criteria provide the definitive evidence that a specific accomplishment has been completed l Accomplishment Criteria must: – Measure success or product maturity over time – Provide objective, explicit proof of completion – Highlight specific areas of effort for tracking, monitoring risk, or incrementally verifying a process of product – Relate directly to accomplishments – Answer “how do I know when a accomplishment has been completed” – Focus of exit criteria – Express entrance criteria as predecessors in the IMS
  • 13. IMP/IMS - 13/19 Tasks l Tasks are time phased, detailed activities (where work is accomplished and funds are expended) required to support the IMP criteria and accomplishments l Tasks are broken down from the Event Criteria – Tasks broken down into sub–tasks – The sum of all the tasks covers all the Contractor WBS Dictionary, Statement of Work and other contractual requirements – ONLY durations, predecessors and lags – no dates l For each Task – Lag or % – SS+50% – Rationale for duration and predecessors in dependency link described in the notes field – Resources for each task used for Basis of Estimate
  • 14. IMP/IMS - 14/19 IMS Development within the IPT IMS Critical Path Analysis, Baseline, Monitor, Update Define IMS tasks/activities, durations and dependencies Combine, consolidate, refine across program IMP Key Events (RFP + unique) “Product Tree” Systems Engineering IPT & other AITs IPT Structure WBS Structure Each IPT defines SAs & ACs for their WBS elements May Need Multiple Iterations
  • 15. IMP/IMS - 15/19 Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) l Integrated, networked, multi–layer schedule of activities needed to achieve the contractual objectives l Detailed tasks to be completed l Networked schedule will all dependent tasks linked – Task numbering correlates IMS with Project IMP – Both Gantt and Network provided l Critical path identified and analysis of schedule slack – Used during execution to track progress to plan l Layering allows different levels of detail to be shown l Resource loading should match EVMS
  • 16. IMP/IMS - 16/19 Constructing an IMS l The IMS is built as a iterative process between the IPT members – Detailed task identification takes place through an IMP/IMS Point of Contact (POC) using the WBS dictionary – PM-100 requires “activities in the detailed networks should be generally be no longer than twenty (20) working days in duration” – Level of Effort tasks should avoid “grabbing” the critical path, by keeping the completion dates of LOE short of the program end date l Task constraints must be “well formed” – “Must Finish On,” “Finish No Later Than,” and “Start No Later Than” constraints should be avoided since they do not support credible risk assessment and given unreliable results in a statistical risk assessment – Hard constraints from the government should not be carried as hard constraints in the IMS
  • 17. IMP/IMS - 17/19 Task Relationships l Finish-to-Start (FS) – the standard “one task must finish before another starts” link: – A test cannot begin until test procedures are written. l Start-to-Start (SS) - this is used when one task cannot start until another starts (often involves some lag time) – A test is scheduled for four weeks, but gathering test results begins 1 week after the start of the tests l Finish-to-Finish (FF) - appropriate where only task completion (but not the start) is driven by another task – The design could start anytime, but can’t complete until 1 month after environmental results are available l Start-to-Finish (SF) - used for administrative-type tasks you want driven by another task – Preparing the agenda two weeks prior to a review
  • 18. IMP/IMS - 18/19 Maintaining the IMS Post–Award l For the IMS – Criteria for IMS changes should be clerarly satted – Coordination process for changes documented – Key contract dates may be impacted – Ensure changes are monitored and distributed to IPT members – Monitor linkage to IMP and other management tools (EVMS) l For IMP – IMP requires contract modification to implement changes – Minor changes to IMP may not impact contract
  • 19. IMP/IMS - 19/19 Summary l IMP/IMS approach is a disciplined approach for planning, organizing and managing a program l IMP is a contractual roadmap for the entire program l IMS is a key tool for monitoring program progress l These are complex, expensive documents, that force the contractor to plan essentials of program l In order to maximize their usefulness after award they need to be developed and maintained with care l The “trick” is balancing detail with ease-of-use with contract compliance