SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Improving Your Surveys and
Questionnaires with Cognitive
Interviewing
Jean E. Fox
Scott S. Fricker
Jennifer Edgar
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
UXPA 2018
June 28, 2018
All views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not reflect the views or policies of BLS.
2 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox
Thank you
Scott Fricker
Jennifer Edgar
3 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox3 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Agenda
 Surveys in UX work
 Why we need Cognitive Interviewing (CI)
 Background on CI
 How CI is similar to and different from
Usability Testing (UT)
So you can get started with CI
 More ways that CI can help!
4 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox4 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
What is a Survey?
 A series of questions given to respondents to
collect information from them
“Questionnaires” and “polls” have same purpose
 Systematic
Ask the same thing to all participants
Can get data from many people easily
 Self- or Interviewer-administered
5 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox5 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Surveys in UX Work
 We can use surveys
On their own
With other methods
– Usability Testing
– Card Sorting
– Field Observations
6 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox6 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Standard UX Surveys
 Known UX surveys that have been tested
Reliable
Valid
Sensitive
 Examples
System Usability Scale (SUS) (Brooke)
SUPR-Q (Sauro)
SUMI, WAMMI (Kirakowski)
QUIS (Norman)
7 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox7 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
BUT…
 If standard surveys can’t address our issues
We write our own.
8 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox8 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Home-Grown Surveys
 Benefits—
Target the information we want
Easy to write (right??)
 BUT…
Are you sure you are measuring what you want?
How do you know?
 AND
You know how to design interfaces, but you still
run usability tests
And you still find problems.
9 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox
Cognitive Interviewing
Make sure you are measuring
what you want to measure
10 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox10 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
So, What is Cognitive Interviewing?
 It’s kind of like Usability Testing for surveys.
Participants answer survey questions
You talk to them about their response process
Identify problems with the survey
 But there are some important differences.
11 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox11 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Background on Cognitive Interviewing
 Developed in the field of Survey Methodology
 Goal is to learn how respondents:
Understand the question
Retrieve the information
Decide what answer to give
Respond to the question
 Problems can occur in any of these stages
12 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox12 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Types of Problems CI Can Uncover
 Complicated Instructions
 Confusing or vague question wording
 Jargon
 Inappropriate assumptions (e.g., the question
doesn’t apply to your respondent)
 Unexpectedly sensitive topics
 Questions that are difficult to answer
 Answers that are difficult to recall
13 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox13 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Just to Give You an Idea…
 How many UX professionals are in your group?
What is your answer?
How did you determine your answer?
Who did you include as a “UX Professional”?
Exclude?
How did you define your “group”?
What does it mean to be “in” your group?
What time frame did you include?
14 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox14 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Testing Overview – Both UT and CI
 Define research goals, create materials, etc.
 Recruit participants
 Conduct study
Informed consent
Complete task
Debriefing
Incentives
 Analyze data
 Make recommendations
15 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox15 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Testing Goals
 UT
Uncover usability problems and potential
solutions
 CI
Ensure the question/survey is capturing the
intended information
16 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox16 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Moderators
 UT & CI: Similar skills and training
Work comfortably with all participants
Interact in an unbiased manner
React and adjust the test session as needed
Analyze and interpret data
17 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox17 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
When to Test
 UT & CI
Ideally, start early and continue through
development stages
Goals are different at different stages
– Early – Test wireframe / concepts
– Midway – Test features / questions
– Late – Test overall product / survey
18 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox18 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Participants
 UT and CI
Target specific populations, determined by
research goals
Typically use convenience samples
 UT
Often 5-10 (per user group)
Or more for a quantitative study
 CI
Typically 20-30
19 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox19 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Moderating Sessions
 UT
In-person or remote
Moderated or unmoderated
 CI
In-person or over the phone
Almost always moderated
20 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox20 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Tasks
 Type of Tasks
UT: Complete tasks using the product/website
CI: Answer survey questions
 Scenarios/vignettes to provide context
UT: You are a school counselor, and you want to
know the education requirements for accountants.
CI: Pretend this is your high school transcript, and
answer these questions about your courses.
21 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox21 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Thinking Aloud
 UT and CI
Information about participant’s processes,
thoughts, and reactions
Pros and cons, decide based on research goals
22 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox22 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Debriefing Questions / Probes
 To learn about participants’ thoughts and
reactions
Helpful for UT
Essence of CI
23 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox23 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Debriefing Questions / Probes
 Can be done
During the task
– Get thoughts as participants are working
– But this can interrupt their work
Post-Task / Post-question(s)
– Get feedback on specific tasks/questions
Post-Test / Post-survey
– Get overall impressions
24 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox24 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Goals of Questions / Probes
During the Task
 UT and CI
Explore unexpected behaviors, responses, and
reactions
Understand why participants are struggling
25 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox25 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Sample Questions / Probes
During the Task
 UT and CI
I noticed you hesitated, can you tell me what you
are you thinking?
What are you looking for?
26 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox26 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Goals of Post-Task
Debriefing Questions / Probes
 UT
Why participants did what they did during an individual
task
How they felt about their experience
Scripted or spontaneous
 CI
What participants were thinking as they answered a
specific question or group of questions
How they decided what to do
Scripted or spontaneous
27 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox27 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Sample Post-Task
Debriefing Questions / Probes
 UT
How easy or difficult was the task?
How confident are you that you completed the
task?
 CI
In your own words, what was the question
asking?
What does <term or phrase> mean to you?
How did you decide on your response?
28 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox28 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Goals of Post-Test
Debriefing Questions / Probes
 UT and CI
Overall impressions about the product / survey
What participants liked and didn’t like
Any recommendations they have
Scripted or spontaneous questions
29 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox
Data Collected
Data Usability Testing
Cognitive
Interviewing
Qualitative
• Observations
• Comments
• Debriefing responses
Quantitative
• Task times
• Success rates
• Satisfaction ratings
• Etc
• Actual responses to
survey questions, in
context of the
debriefing
information
30 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox30 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Analysis for Both UT and CI
 Qualitative data – look for patterns and
themes across participants
 Quantitative data
UT: look at means by user group, use statistics as
appropriate
CI: review responses in context of the answers to
the probes
31 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox31 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Outcome of Analysis
 UT
Identify usability problems
– Effectiveness
• Tasks that are difficult to complete
• Features that are hard to use
– Efficiency
• Activities that took too long to complete
– Satisfaction
Make recommendations
– Ways to fix the usability problems
32 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox32 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Outcome of Analysis
 CI
Identify problems with
– Understanding the questions
– Retrieving the information
– Deciding what answer to give
– Responding to the question
Make recommendations
– Rewording of questions
– Rework skip patterns
– Provide context for interpreting survey results.
33 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox33 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Getting Started with CI
 Whenever you are asking users questions,
consider testing the questions first.
For usability testing, use Cognitive Interviewing to
evaluate your questions during the pilot test.
For other surveys, consider starting with a review
by your UX colleagues or actual respondents
You want to know
– Do they interpret the questions the way you want?
– Can they answer the questions?
– Do the response options make sense?
34 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox34 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
CI Can Do Even More for UX work!
 Evaluate web content, instructions, or other
text products
Can users understand it?
Does it mean what you think it means?
 Evaluate other types of forms
Do people know what goes in each field?
35 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox35 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Conclusions
 It’s important to be sure that our surveys are
asking what we want them to ask.
 CI can help you do that
 What you know about UT already may make it
easy for you to incorporate CI into your
research
 To learn more about CI, see:
Willis, G. B. (2004). Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for
Improving Questionnaire Design. Sage Publications.
Contact Information
36 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov
Jean E. Fox
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Fox.Jean@bls.gov
37 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox
Usability Testing Cognitive Interviewing
What are the objectives
of the methods?
Identify usability problems
and potential solutions
Understand how
respondents interpret
survey questions and the
challenges they face
completing a survey
When in development
would you use the
method?
Anytime in development
Who conducts the tests?
Typically User Experience
professionals, possibly with
a formal coursework related
to usability testing
Typically Survey
Methodologists, often with
informal training in cognitive
interviewing
Who participates in the
tests?
Participants are from the target population(s)
Smaller sample sizes for
qualitative tests, larger for
quantitative tests
Generally aim for 20-30
participants
38 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox
Usability Testing Cognitive Interviewing
What methods are used?
Participants complete tasks (answer survey questions)
while their experience is observed in some way
Participants complete tasks
assigned to them, often with
scenarios providing context
for the task
Participants complete
surveys with their own
responses
In-person or remote testing Usually in-person testing
Sometimes moderated Always moderated
Can be done in lab or at respondent’s location
May use think aloud
What data are collected?
Quantitative and/or
qualitative data
Generally qualitative data
only
Focus is on performance
and user satisfaction
Focus is on cognitive
processes while completing
the survey

More Related Content

PDF
How to use Big Data to drive product strategy and adoption
PPT
Communities of interpretation2014
PDF
What do you really mean when you tweet? Challenges for opinion mining on soci...
PDF
Dark Data and Improving Human Rights in Fulton County
PDF
Using Data Science for Social Good: Fighting Human Trafficking
PPTX
Online survey tools ppt 30-01-2016
PDF
Social Data Sentiment Analysis
PDF
Modeling Social Data, Lecture 2: Introduction to Counting
How to use Big Data to drive product strategy and adoption
Communities of interpretation2014
What do you really mean when you tweet? Challenges for opinion mining on soci...
Dark Data and Improving Human Rights in Fulton County
Using Data Science for Social Good: Fighting Human Trafficking
Online survey tools ppt 30-01-2016
Social Data Sentiment Analysis
Modeling Social Data, Lecture 2: Introduction to Counting

What's hot (20)

PDF
Social media & sentiment analysis splunk conf2012
PDF
Modeling Social Data, Lecture 1: Case Studies
PDF
Poynter lesson 4
PDF
Finding the story qualitative
PDF
Gop social media_analysis_21_dec_2011_final
PDF
Multimedia data minig and analytics sentiment analysis using social multimedia
DOCX
Saucier_Jonathon_Resume
PPTX
Haystack 2019 - Search-based recommendations at Politico - Ryan Kohl
PPTX
Snapchat dissertation topics
PDF
Challenges of social media analysis in the real world
PDF
The Data Errors we Make by Sean Taylor at Big Data Spain 2017
PDF
Social media sentiment and consumer confidence
PDF
Social media analytics as a service: tools from GATE
PDF
Predicting Elections with Twitter
PDF
Exploring the relation between Self-regulation Online Activities, and Academi...
PDF
Twitter Based Outcome Predictions of 2019 Indian General Elections Using Deci...
PDF
Modeling Social Data, Lecture 10: Networks
PDF
Data2U: Scalable Real time Student Feedback in Active Learning Environments
PPTX
On Information Quality: Can Your Data Do The Job? (SCECR 2015 Keynote)
Social media & sentiment analysis splunk conf2012
Modeling Social Data, Lecture 1: Case Studies
Poynter lesson 4
Finding the story qualitative
Gop social media_analysis_21_dec_2011_final
Multimedia data minig and analytics sentiment analysis using social multimedia
Saucier_Jonathon_Resume
Haystack 2019 - Search-based recommendations at Politico - Ryan Kohl
Snapchat dissertation topics
Challenges of social media analysis in the real world
The Data Errors we Make by Sean Taylor at Big Data Spain 2017
Social media sentiment and consumer confidence
Social media analytics as a service: tools from GATE
Predicting Elections with Twitter
Exploring the relation between Self-regulation Online Activities, and Academi...
Twitter Based Outcome Predictions of 2019 Indian General Elections Using Deci...
Modeling Social Data, Lecture 10: Networks
Data2U: Scalable Real time Student Feedback in Active Learning Environments
On Information Quality: Can Your Data Do The Job? (SCECR 2015 Keynote)
Ad

Similar to Improving Your Surveys and Questionnaires with Cognitive Interviewing (20)

PDF
PPTX
Evaluating Complex Systems: Strategies for Testing Systems You Can’t Understand
PPTX
PPTX
General Tips to Fast-Track Your Quantitative Methodology
PPTX
Writing-Action-Research.pptx
PDF
Big Data Opportunities in Census Bureau Research
PPT
A Step-By-Step Guide to Developing a National Report Card on the Physical Act...
PPT
Krg survey group ppt
PPTX
RESEARCH writing and introduction to ...
PDF
UX Field Research Toolkit - Updated for Big Design 2018
PPTX
Statistical Methods for Research for Ms.pptx
PPTX
Research and planning
PDF
1 Statistics Intro.pdf
PPTX
The inevitable survey 2021
PPT
Chap 7
PPTX
Presentation final.pptx
PPTX
questionnaire preparation
PDF
Survey design guide
PPTX
03-Sep-2019_J_handouts.pptx
PDF
Research Method for Business chapter 6
Evaluating Complex Systems: Strategies for Testing Systems You Can’t Understand
General Tips to Fast-Track Your Quantitative Methodology
Writing-Action-Research.pptx
Big Data Opportunities in Census Bureau Research
A Step-By-Step Guide to Developing a National Report Card on the Physical Act...
Krg survey group ppt
RESEARCH writing and introduction to ...
UX Field Research Toolkit - Updated for Big Design 2018
Statistical Methods for Research for Ms.pptx
Research and planning
1 Statistics Intro.pdf
The inevitable survey 2021
Chap 7
Presentation final.pptx
questionnaire preparation
Survey design guide
03-Sep-2019_J_handouts.pptx
Research Method for Business chapter 6
Ad

More from UXPA International (20)

PPTX
UXPA 2023: Start Strong - Lessons learned from associate programs to platform...
PDF
UXPA 2023: Disrupting Inaccessibility: Applying A11Y-Focused Discovery & Idea...
PDF
UXPA 2023 Poster: ESG & Sustainable UX
PDF
UXPA 2023 Poster: The Two Tracks of UX Under Agile: Tactical and Strategic
PDF
UXPA 2023: Data science and UX: Smarter together
PDF
UXPA 2023: UX Fracking: Using Mixed Methods to Extract Hidden Insights
PDF
UXPA 2023 Poster: Are virtual spaces the future of video conferencing?
PDF
UXPA 2023: Learn how to get over personas by swiping right on user roles
PDF
UXPA 2023: F@#$ User Personas
PDF
UXPA 2023 Poster: Pocket Research Guide - Empower your Solution and Foster Cu...
PDF
UXPA 2023: Experience Maps - A designer's framework for working in Agile team...
PDF
UXPA 2023 Poster: Atomic Research in Practice: Using a Feedback Repository to...
PDF
UXPA 2023 Poster: Leveraging Dial Testing To Measure Real-Time User Frustrati...
PDF
UXPA 2023: UX Enterprise Story: How to apply a UX process to a company withou...
PPTX
UXPA 2023: High-Fives over Zoom: Creating a Remote-First Creative Team
PPTX
UXPA 2023: Behind the Bias: Dissecting human shortcuts for better research & ...
PDF
UXPA 2023 Poster: Improving the Internal and External User Experience of a Fe...
PDF
UXPA 2023 Poster: 5 Key Findings from Moderated Accessibility Testing with Sc...
PDF
UXPA 2023: Lessons for new managers
PDF
UXPA 2023: Redesigning An Automotive Feature from Gasoline to Electric Vehicl...
UXPA 2023: Start Strong - Lessons learned from associate programs to platform...
UXPA 2023: Disrupting Inaccessibility: Applying A11Y-Focused Discovery & Idea...
UXPA 2023 Poster: ESG & Sustainable UX
UXPA 2023 Poster: The Two Tracks of UX Under Agile: Tactical and Strategic
UXPA 2023: Data science and UX: Smarter together
UXPA 2023: UX Fracking: Using Mixed Methods to Extract Hidden Insights
UXPA 2023 Poster: Are virtual spaces the future of video conferencing?
UXPA 2023: Learn how to get over personas by swiping right on user roles
UXPA 2023: F@#$ User Personas
UXPA 2023 Poster: Pocket Research Guide - Empower your Solution and Foster Cu...
UXPA 2023: Experience Maps - A designer's framework for working in Agile team...
UXPA 2023 Poster: Atomic Research in Practice: Using a Feedback Repository to...
UXPA 2023 Poster: Leveraging Dial Testing To Measure Real-Time User Frustrati...
UXPA 2023: UX Enterprise Story: How to apply a UX process to a company withou...
UXPA 2023: High-Fives over Zoom: Creating a Remote-First Creative Team
UXPA 2023: Behind the Bias: Dissecting human shortcuts for better research & ...
UXPA 2023 Poster: Improving the Internal and External User Experience of a Fe...
UXPA 2023 Poster: 5 Key Findings from Moderated Accessibility Testing with Sc...
UXPA 2023: Lessons for new managers
UXPA 2023: Redesigning An Automotive Feature from Gasoline to Electric Vehicl...

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
MERISTEMATIC TISSUES (MERISTEMS) PPT PUBLIC
DOC
学位双硕士UTAS毕业证,墨尔本理工学院毕业证留学硕士毕业证
PPTX
Anesthesia and it's stage with mnemonic and images
PPT
The Effect of Human Resource Management Practice on Organizational Performanc...
PPT
First Aid Training Presentation Slides.ppt
PPTX
Impressionism_PostImpressionism_Presentation.pptx
PPTX
Presentation for DGJV QMS (PQP)_12.03.2025.pptx
PPTX
worship songs, in any order, compilation
PPTX
Human Mind & its character Characteristics
PPTX
2025-08-10 Joseph 02 (shared slides).pptx
PDF
Tunisia's Founding Father(s) Pitch-Deck 2022.pdf
PDF
Swiggy’s Playbook: UX, Logistics & Monetization
PPTX
Introduction-to-Food-Packaging-and-packaging -materials.pptx
PDF
COLEAD A2F approach and Theory of Change
PPTX
nose tajweed for the arabic alphabets for the responsive
PPTX
Effective_Handling_Information_Presentation.pptx
PPTX
The Effect of Human Resource Management Practice on Organizational Performanc...
PPTX
Primary and secondary sources, and history
PPTX
Self management and self evaluation presentation
PPTX
_ISO_Presentation_ISO 9001 and 45001.pptx
MERISTEMATIC TISSUES (MERISTEMS) PPT PUBLIC
学位双硕士UTAS毕业证,墨尔本理工学院毕业证留学硕士毕业证
Anesthesia and it's stage with mnemonic and images
The Effect of Human Resource Management Practice on Organizational Performanc...
First Aid Training Presentation Slides.ppt
Impressionism_PostImpressionism_Presentation.pptx
Presentation for DGJV QMS (PQP)_12.03.2025.pptx
worship songs, in any order, compilation
Human Mind & its character Characteristics
2025-08-10 Joseph 02 (shared slides).pptx
Tunisia's Founding Father(s) Pitch-Deck 2022.pdf
Swiggy’s Playbook: UX, Logistics & Monetization
Introduction-to-Food-Packaging-and-packaging -materials.pptx
COLEAD A2F approach and Theory of Change
nose tajweed for the arabic alphabets for the responsive
Effective_Handling_Information_Presentation.pptx
The Effect of Human Resource Management Practice on Organizational Performanc...
Primary and secondary sources, and history
Self management and self evaluation presentation
_ISO_Presentation_ISO 9001 and 45001.pptx

Improving Your Surveys and Questionnaires with Cognitive Interviewing

  • 1. 1 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Improving Your Surveys and Questionnaires with Cognitive Interviewing Jean E. Fox Scott S. Fricker Jennifer Edgar U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics UXPA 2018 June 28, 2018 All views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not reflect the views or policies of BLS.
  • 2. 2 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox Thank you Scott Fricker Jennifer Edgar
  • 3. 3 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox3 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Agenda  Surveys in UX work  Why we need Cognitive Interviewing (CI)  Background on CI  How CI is similar to and different from Usability Testing (UT) So you can get started with CI  More ways that CI can help!
  • 4. 4 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox4 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov What is a Survey?  A series of questions given to respondents to collect information from them “Questionnaires” and “polls” have same purpose  Systematic Ask the same thing to all participants Can get data from many people easily  Self- or Interviewer-administered
  • 5. 5 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox5 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Surveys in UX Work  We can use surveys On their own With other methods – Usability Testing – Card Sorting – Field Observations
  • 6. 6 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox6 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Standard UX Surveys  Known UX surveys that have been tested Reliable Valid Sensitive  Examples System Usability Scale (SUS) (Brooke) SUPR-Q (Sauro) SUMI, WAMMI (Kirakowski) QUIS (Norman)
  • 7. 7 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox7 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov BUT…  If standard surveys can’t address our issues We write our own.
  • 8. 8 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox8 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Home-Grown Surveys  Benefits— Target the information we want Easy to write (right??)  BUT… Are you sure you are measuring what you want? How do you know?  AND You know how to design interfaces, but you still run usability tests And you still find problems.
  • 9. 9 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox Cognitive Interviewing Make sure you are measuring what you want to measure
  • 10. 10 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox10 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov So, What is Cognitive Interviewing?  It’s kind of like Usability Testing for surveys. Participants answer survey questions You talk to them about their response process Identify problems with the survey  But there are some important differences.
  • 11. 11 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox11 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Background on Cognitive Interviewing  Developed in the field of Survey Methodology  Goal is to learn how respondents: Understand the question Retrieve the information Decide what answer to give Respond to the question  Problems can occur in any of these stages
  • 12. 12 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox12 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Types of Problems CI Can Uncover  Complicated Instructions  Confusing or vague question wording  Jargon  Inappropriate assumptions (e.g., the question doesn’t apply to your respondent)  Unexpectedly sensitive topics  Questions that are difficult to answer  Answers that are difficult to recall
  • 13. 13 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox13 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Just to Give You an Idea…  How many UX professionals are in your group? What is your answer? How did you determine your answer? Who did you include as a “UX Professional”? Exclude? How did you define your “group”? What does it mean to be “in” your group? What time frame did you include?
  • 14. 14 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox14 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Testing Overview – Both UT and CI  Define research goals, create materials, etc.  Recruit participants  Conduct study Informed consent Complete task Debriefing Incentives  Analyze data  Make recommendations
  • 15. 15 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox15 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Testing Goals  UT Uncover usability problems and potential solutions  CI Ensure the question/survey is capturing the intended information
  • 16. 16 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox16 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Moderators  UT & CI: Similar skills and training Work comfortably with all participants Interact in an unbiased manner React and adjust the test session as needed Analyze and interpret data
  • 17. 17 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox17 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov When to Test  UT & CI Ideally, start early and continue through development stages Goals are different at different stages – Early – Test wireframe / concepts – Midway – Test features / questions – Late – Test overall product / survey
  • 18. 18 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox18 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Participants  UT and CI Target specific populations, determined by research goals Typically use convenience samples  UT Often 5-10 (per user group) Or more for a quantitative study  CI Typically 20-30
  • 19. 19 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox19 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Moderating Sessions  UT In-person or remote Moderated or unmoderated  CI In-person or over the phone Almost always moderated
  • 20. 20 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox20 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Tasks  Type of Tasks UT: Complete tasks using the product/website CI: Answer survey questions  Scenarios/vignettes to provide context UT: You are a school counselor, and you want to know the education requirements for accountants. CI: Pretend this is your high school transcript, and answer these questions about your courses.
  • 21. 21 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox21 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Thinking Aloud  UT and CI Information about participant’s processes, thoughts, and reactions Pros and cons, decide based on research goals
  • 22. 22 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox22 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Debriefing Questions / Probes  To learn about participants’ thoughts and reactions Helpful for UT Essence of CI
  • 23. 23 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox23 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Debriefing Questions / Probes  Can be done During the task – Get thoughts as participants are working – But this can interrupt their work Post-Task / Post-question(s) – Get feedback on specific tasks/questions Post-Test / Post-survey – Get overall impressions
  • 24. 24 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox24 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Goals of Questions / Probes During the Task  UT and CI Explore unexpected behaviors, responses, and reactions Understand why participants are struggling
  • 25. 25 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox25 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Sample Questions / Probes During the Task  UT and CI I noticed you hesitated, can you tell me what you are you thinking? What are you looking for?
  • 26. 26 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox26 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Goals of Post-Task Debriefing Questions / Probes  UT Why participants did what they did during an individual task How they felt about their experience Scripted or spontaneous  CI What participants were thinking as they answered a specific question or group of questions How they decided what to do Scripted or spontaneous
  • 27. 27 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox27 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Sample Post-Task Debriefing Questions / Probes  UT How easy or difficult was the task? How confident are you that you completed the task?  CI In your own words, what was the question asking? What does <term or phrase> mean to you? How did you decide on your response?
  • 28. 28 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox28 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Goals of Post-Test Debriefing Questions / Probes  UT and CI Overall impressions about the product / survey What participants liked and didn’t like Any recommendations they have Scripted or spontaneous questions
  • 29. 29 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox Data Collected Data Usability Testing Cognitive Interviewing Qualitative • Observations • Comments • Debriefing responses Quantitative • Task times • Success rates • Satisfaction ratings • Etc • Actual responses to survey questions, in context of the debriefing information
  • 30. 30 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox30 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Analysis for Both UT and CI  Qualitative data – look for patterns and themes across participants  Quantitative data UT: look at means by user group, use statistics as appropriate CI: review responses in context of the answers to the probes
  • 31. 31 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox31 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Outcome of Analysis  UT Identify usability problems – Effectiveness • Tasks that are difficult to complete • Features that are hard to use – Efficiency • Activities that took too long to complete – Satisfaction Make recommendations – Ways to fix the usability problems
  • 32. 32 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox32 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Outcome of Analysis  CI Identify problems with – Understanding the questions – Retrieving the information – Deciding what answer to give – Responding to the question Make recommendations – Rewording of questions – Rework skip patterns – Provide context for interpreting survey results.
  • 33. 33 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox33 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Getting Started with CI  Whenever you are asking users questions, consider testing the questions first. For usability testing, use Cognitive Interviewing to evaluate your questions during the pilot test. For other surveys, consider starting with a review by your UX colleagues or actual respondents You want to know – Do they interpret the questions the way you want? – Can they answer the questions? – Do the response options make sense?
  • 34. 34 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox34 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov CI Can Do Even More for UX work!  Evaluate web content, instructions, or other text products Can users understand it? Does it mean what you think it means?  Evaluate other types of forms Do people know what goes in each field?
  • 35. 35 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox35 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Conclusions  It’s important to be sure that our surveys are asking what we want them to ask.  CI can help you do that  What you know about UT already may make it easy for you to incorporate CI into your research  To learn more about CI, see: Willis, G. B. (2004). Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Sage Publications.
  • 36. Contact Information 36 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov Jean E. Fox Bureau of Labor Statistics Fox.Jean@bls.gov
  • 37. 37 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox Usability Testing Cognitive Interviewing What are the objectives of the methods? Identify usability problems and potential solutions Understand how respondents interpret survey questions and the challenges they face completing a survey When in development would you use the method? Anytime in development Who conducts the tests? Typically User Experience professionals, possibly with a formal coursework related to usability testing Typically Survey Methodologists, often with informal training in cognitive interviewing Who participates in the tests? Participants are from the target population(s) Smaller sample sizes for qualitative tests, larger for quantitative tests Generally aim for 20-30 participants
  • 38. 38 — U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS • bls.gov @jeanharrisfox Usability Testing Cognitive Interviewing What methods are used? Participants complete tasks (answer survey questions) while their experience is observed in some way Participants complete tasks assigned to them, often with scenarios providing context for the task Participants complete surveys with their own responses In-person or remote testing Usually in-person testing Sometimes moderated Always moderated Can be done in lab or at respondent’s location May use think aloud What data are collected? Quantitative and/or qualitative data Generally qualitative data only Focus is on performance and user satisfaction Focus is on cognitive processes while completing the survey