In this task, you are required to discuss two articles from differen.docx
Download as DOCX, PDF0 likes8 views
The task requires a comparative analysis of two articles from different humanities disciplines addressing the same topic, such as challenges faced by international students in Australia. The analysis must explore how each article defines the academic problem, their conclusions, the evidence used, and the presentation of this evidence. Detailed examples from the articles and references to academic writing literature are expected to substantiate claims.
1 of 2
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Similar to In this task, you are required to discuss two articles from differen.docx (20)
More from breaksdayle (20)
In this task, you are required to discuss two articles from differen.docx
- 1. In this task, you are required to discuss two articles from different disciplines in the humanities that address the same general topic area – for example, two articles that address issues faced by international students in Australia, one from a media and communications perspective and one from a ‘political’, or ‘education’ perspective. You will be provided with a choice of articles on Moodle. Your discussion will focus on how the articles define an academic problem, what kind of conclusion they reach, how they make claims, what kind of evidence – the different types of sources (primary, secondary, and tertiary) each of the articles uses – and how they present this evidence. As it is a comparative analysis, it is important that you look for differences between the articles and assess these differences according to principles of academic research and writing. You will need to provide specific and detailed examples from the two articles, and refer to other research texts to support your own claims. You will also use additional articles in the field of academic writing to support your argument. Follow the 4 Questions Q1. Each articles’ approaches towards problem Q2. Differences in conclusion Q3. How did they prove their point/ what evidence they had to support
- 2. Q4. Their differences in presentation