2
Most read
8
Most read
15
Most read
INFILTRATION
PRESENTED BY
KARUNAKAR KEMA
Infiltration
 General
 Process of water penetrating
from ground into soil
 Factors affecting
 Condition of soil surface, vegetative
cover, soil properties, hydraulic
conductivity, antecedent soil
moisture
 Four zones
 Saturated, transmission, wetting,
and wetting front

depth
Wetting Zone
Transmission
Zone
Transition Zone
Saturation Zone
Wetting Front

Infiltration
 Infiltration rate
 Rate at which water enters the soil at the surface
(in/hr or cm/hr)
 Cumulative infiltration
 Accumulated depth of water infiltrating during
given time period

t
dftF
0
)()( 
)(tf
dt
tdF
tf
)(
)( 
Infiltrometers
Single Ring Double Ring
Infiltration Methods
 Horton and Phillips
 Infiltration models developed as approximate solutions of an exact theory
(Richard’s Equation)
 Green – Ampt
 Infiltration model developed from an approximate theory to an exact solution
Hortonian Infiltration
 Recall Richard’s
Equation
 Assume K and D are
constants, not a
function of  or z
 Solve for moisture
diffusion at surface












K
z
D
zt 

z
K
z
D
t 




2
2


0
2
2
z
D
t 




kt
cc effftf 
 )()( 0
f0 initial infiltration rate, fc is constant rate and k is decay constant
Hortonian Infiltration
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Time
Infiltrationrate,f
k1
k3
k2
k1 < k2 < k3
fc
f0
Philips Equation
 Recall Richard’s
Equation
 Assume K and D are
functions of , not z
 Solution
 Two terms represent
effects of
 Suction head
 Gravity head
 S – Sorptivity
 Function of soil suction
potential
 Found from experiment












K
z
D
zt 

KtSttF  2/1
)(
KSttf   2/1
2
1
)(
Green – Ampt Infiltration
Wetted Zone
Wetting Front
Ponded Water
Ground Surface
Dry Soil
0h
L

n
i

z
  LLtF i )()(
dt
dL
dt
dF
f 
zh 
K
z
Kf 


f
z
h
Kqz 


MoistureSoilInitial
FrontWettingtoDepth


i
L

Green – Ampt
Infiltration (Cont.)
 Apply finite difference to the
derivative, between
 Ground surface
 Wetting front
K
z
Kf 




Wetted Zone
Wetting Front
Ground Surface
Dry Soil
L


i

z
0,0  z
fLz   ,
K
L
KK
z
KK
z
Kf
f







0
0







F
L
LtF )(








 1
F
Kf
f
K
z
Kf 








 1
L
K
dt
dL f









 1
F
Kf
f
dt
dL
f 
Green – Ampt
Infiltration (Cont.)
 LtF )(
Wetted Zone
Wetting Front
Ground Surface
Dry Soil
L


i

z
L
dL
dLdt
K
f
f


 


CLLt
K
ff 

)ln(

Integrate
Evaluate the constant of integration
)ln( ffC 
0@0  tL
)ln(
L
LKt
f
f
f





Green – Ampt Infiltration
(Cont.)
)ln(
L
LKt
f
f
f





)1ln(
f
f
F
KtF












 1
F
Kf
f
Wetted Zone
Wetting Front
Ground Surface
Dry Soil
L


i

z
Nonlinear equation, requiring iterative solution.
Soil Parameters
 Green-Ampt model requires
 Hydraulic conductivity, Porosity, Wetting Front
Suction Head
Soil Class Porosity Effective
Porosity
Wetting
Front
Suction
Head
Hydraulic
Conductivity
n e  K
(cm) (cm/h)
Sand 0.437 0.417 4.95 11.78
Loam 0.463 0.434 9.89 0.34
Clay 0.475 0.385 31.63 0.03
re n  
ees  )1( 
e
r
es

 
 Effective saturation
Effective porosity
Ponding time
 Elapsed time between the time rainfall begins and the time water begins to
pond on the soil surface (tp)
Ponding Time
 Up to the time of ponding,
all rainfall has infiltrated (i
= rainfall rate)
if  ptiF *








 1
F
Kf
f










 1
* p
f
ti
Ki

)( Kii
Kt
f
p




Potential
Infiltration
Actual Infiltration
Rainfall
Accumulated
Rainfall
Infiltration
Time
Time
Infiltrationrate,f
Cumulative
Infiltration,F
i
pt
pp tiF *
Example
 Silty-Loam soil, 30% effective
saturation, rainfall 5 cm/hr
intensity
30.0
/65.0
7.16
486.0




e
e
s
hrcmK
cm

340.0)486.0)(3.01()1(  ees 
340.0*7.16
hr17.0
))(65.00.5(0.5
68.5
65.0
)(






KiKii
Kt
f
p

INFILTRATION PPT

More Related Content

PPTX
Unit 3 INFILTRATION
PPTX
Infiltration equations and index
PPTX
Surface processes
PDF
Indicators of climate change
PPSX
Composting
PPTX
Presentation on hydraulic conductivity and drainable porosity
PPTX
Hydrology
PPTX
Class lecture on Hydrology by Rabindra Ranjan saha Lecture 10
Unit 3 INFILTRATION
Infiltration equations and index
Surface processes
Indicators of climate change
Composting
Presentation on hydraulic conductivity and drainable porosity
Hydrology
Class lecture on Hydrology by Rabindra Ranjan saha Lecture 10

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Infiltration and runoff
PPT
Kennedy's and laccy's theory
PPT
Flood estimation
PPTX
Unit 1 Crop Water Requirement
PPTX
Design of Canal (Kennedy & Lacey Theory) & Diversion Headwork
PPTX
Canal irrigation
PPTX
Stream Gauging
PPTX
Infiltration.
DOC
Watershed management
PPTX
Measurement of evapotranspiration
PPTX
4 runoff and floods
PPT
Precipitation and rain gauges
PDF
RESERVOIR SEDIMENTATION
PPT
Soil Water Crop Relationship
PPTX
Irrigation Channels
PPTX
Evapotranspiration ppt
PDF
Estimation of runoff by table method
PPT
Hydrology (Runoff and factors affecting Run off)
Infiltration and runoff
Kennedy's and laccy's theory
Flood estimation
Unit 1 Crop Water Requirement
Design of Canal (Kennedy & Lacey Theory) & Diversion Headwork
Canal irrigation
Stream Gauging
Infiltration.
Watershed management
Measurement of evapotranspiration
4 runoff and floods
Precipitation and rain gauges
RESERVOIR SEDIMENTATION
Soil Water Crop Relationship
Irrigation Channels
Evapotranspiration ppt
Estimation of runoff by table method
Hydrology (Runoff and factors affecting Run off)
Ad

Similar to INFILTRATION PPT (20)

PPTX
subsurface water
PDF
Ragab R 2 - UEI Day 2 - Kochi Jan18
PPT
02 10 evaporation-and_infiltration_jrs-rzl
PPTX
Soil-Water Flow and Solute Transport during Redistribution
PPTX
UNIT-II (4)civil engineeringjhdbdsujdjshsjusjk
PPTX
Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of soil
PPT
Infiltration.ppt
PDF
Green ampt
PDF
Estimation of Evapotranspiration.pdf
PDF
Ecohydro-geomorphology of river basins: A challenge for the next decade.
PPTX
Infiltration hctyxtfxhgcgghcghcgghcghcc.pptx
PDF
Crop Evapotranspiration Allen_Fao irrigation drainage papper 56 1998
DOCX
You have delineated your watershed boundary as shown in the figure abo.docx
PDF
Chapter 4-Surface runoff1.pdf format of document
PDF
Hydrology 5..pdf
PDF
Soil information demand for crop simulation, Introducing AquaCrop - Pasquale ...
 
PPT
Lec.01.introduction to hydrology
PDF
Degradation of palm swamp peatlands in the Peruvian Amazon severely raises em...
PDF
Soil GHG emission factors for tropical peatlands: An update for forests and o...
PPTX
PreseClass lectures on Irrigation Presentation-3 by Rabindra Ranjan saha,PEng...
subsurface water
Ragab R 2 - UEI Day 2 - Kochi Jan18
02 10 evaporation-and_infiltration_jrs-rzl
Soil-Water Flow and Solute Transport during Redistribution
UNIT-II (4)civil engineeringjhdbdsujdjshsjusjk
Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of soil
Infiltration.ppt
Green ampt
Estimation of Evapotranspiration.pdf
Ecohydro-geomorphology of river basins: A challenge for the next decade.
Infiltration hctyxtfxhgcgghcghcgghcghcc.pptx
Crop Evapotranspiration Allen_Fao irrigation drainage papper 56 1998
You have delineated your watershed boundary as shown in the figure abo.docx
Chapter 4-Surface runoff1.pdf format of document
Hydrology 5..pdf
Soil information demand for crop simulation, Introducing AquaCrop - Pasquale ...
 
Lec.01.introduction to hydrology
Degradation of palm swamp peatlands in the Peruvian Amazon severely raises em...
Soil GHG emission factors for tropical peatlands: An update for forests and o...
PreseClass lectures on Irrigation Presentation-3 by Rabindra Ranjan saha,PEng...
Ad

INFILTRATION PPT

  • 2. Infiltration  General  Process of water penetrating from ground into soil  Factors affecting  Condition of soil surface, vegetative cover, soil properties, hydraulic conductivity, antecedent soil moisture  Four zones  Saturated, transmission, wetting, and wetting front  depth Wetting Zone Transmission Zone Transition Zone Saturation Zone Wetting Front 
  • 3. Infiltration  Infiltration rate  Rate at which water enters the soil at the surface (in/hr or cm/hr)  Cumulative infiltration  Accumulated depth of water infiltrating during given time period  t dftF 0 )()(  )(tf dt tdF tf )( )( 
  • 5. Infiltration Methods  Horton and Phillips  Infiltration models developed as approximate solutions of an exact theory (Richard’s Equation)  Green – Ampt  Infiltration model developed from an approximate theory to an exact solution
  • 6. Hortonian Infiltration  Recall Richard’s Equation  Assume K and D are constants, not a function of  or z  Solve for moisture diffusion at surface             K z D zt   z K z D t      2 2   0 2 2 z D t      kt cc effftf   )()( 0 f0 initial infiltration rate, fc is constant rate and k is decay constant
  • 7. Hortonian Infiltration 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Time Infiltrationrate,f k1 k3 k2 k1 < k2 < k3 fc f0
  • 8. Philips Equation  Recall Richard’s Equation  Assume K and D are functions of , not z  Solution  Two terms represent effects of  Suction head  Gravity head  S – Sorptivity  Function of soil suction potential  Found from experiment             K z D zt   KtSttF  2/1 )( KSttf   2/1 2 1 )(
  • 9. Green – Ampt Infiltration Wetted Zone Wetting Front Ponded Water Ground Surface Dry Soil 0h L  n i  z   LLtF i )()( dt dL dt dF f  zh  K z Kf    f z h Kqz    MoistureSoilInitial FrontWettingtoDepth   i L 
  • 10. Green – Ampt Infiltration (Cont.)  Apply finite difference to the derivative, between  Ground surface  Wetting front K z Kf      Wetted Zone Wetting Front Ground Surface Dry Soil L   i  z 0,0  z fLz   , K L KK z KK z Kf f        0 0        F L LtF )(          1 F Kf f K z Kf   
  • 11.        1 L K dt dL f           1 F Kf f dt dL f  Green – Ampt Infiltration (Cont.)  LtF )( Wetted Zone Wetting Front Ground Surface Dry Soil L   i  z L dL dLdt K f f       CLLt K ff   )ln(  Integrate Evaluate the constant of integration )ln( ffC  0@0  tL )ln( L LKt f f f     
  • 12. Green – Ampt Infiltration (Cont.) )ln( L LKt f f f      )1ln( f f F KtF              1 F Kf f Wetted Zone Wetting Front Ground Surface Dry Soil L   i  z Nonlinear equation, requiring iterative solution.
  • 13. Soil Parameters  Green-Ampt model requires  Hydraulic conductivity, Porosity, Wetting Front Suction Head Soil Class Porosity Effective Porosity Wetting Front Suction Head Hydraulic Conductivity n e  K (cm) (cm/h) Sand 0.437 0.417 4.95 11.78 Loam 0.463 0.434 9.89 0.34 Clay 0.475 0.385 31.63 0.03 re n   ees  )1(  e r es     Effective saturation Effective porosity
  • 14. Ponding time  Elapsed time between the time rainfall begins and the time water begins to pond on the soil surface (tp)
  • 15. Ponding Time  Up to the time of ponding, all rainfall has infiltrated (i = rainfall rate) if  ptiF *          1 F Kf f            1 * p f ti Ki  )( Kii Kt f p     Potential Infiltration Actual Infiltration Rainfall Accumulated Rainfall Infiltration Time Time Infiltrationrate,f Cumulative Infiltration,F i pt pp tiF *
  • 16. Example  Silty-Loam soil, 30% effective saturation, rainfall 5 cm/hr intensity 30.0 /65.0 7.16 486.0     e e s hrcmK cm  340.0)486.0)(3.01()1(  ees  340.0*7.16 hr17.0 ))(65.00.5(0.5 68.5 65.0 )(       KiKii Kt f p 