Institutional Frameworks
Experience with CGIAR reform




Lloyd Le Page, CEO CGIAR Consortium
OECD Conference on Agricultural Knowledge Systems
Background of the CGIAR


•    Formed in 1971 due to serious concerns about global hunger
      – India, Pakistan and other Asian countries teetered on the brink of
         famine.
•    Formed on the basis of convincing evidence that agricultural science was a
     powerful instrument for combating hunger. Dramatic increases in agricultural
     productivity possible through:
      – widespread adoption of new, high-yielding rice and wheat varieties,
      – Combines with increased use of fertilizers, irrigation and other inputs, in
         what came to be celebrated as the Green Revolution.
•    Humanitarian concern, mixed with science-based conviction, brought
     together the agricultural researchers and development donors who created
     the CGIAR.
•    Shared objective was to extend the early gains made possible by modern
     agricultural science by developing a workable formula for mobilizing
     resources to support research on a “long-term continuing basis”
Since early beginnings, the CGIAR System had evolved to become
increasingly complicated with multiple donors, center, crop and
national priorities




                                                                  3
Why Reform ?
Desired outcome of CGIAR Reform

                     FROM                                                    TO
                                                     Clear vision with focused priorities that respond to
Mission creep and trying to do everything
                                                     global development challenges
Duplicative mandate of the Centers without clear     Centers that collaborate, work toward the System
System-wide vision and strategy for impact           agenda and priorities, and deliver impact
Complex and cumbersome governance and lack of        Streamlined and effective System-level governance
accountability                                       with clear accountability
Static partnerships that are not enabling scalable   Strong and innovative partnerships with NARS, the
impact and research adoption                         private sector and civil society that enable impact

Lack of coordination among investors                 Strengthened, coordinated funding mechanisms
                                                     that are linked to the System agenda and priorities

Declining core resources                             Stabilization and growth of resource support




                   Greater impact on food security and poverty reduction


                                                                                                      5
In new CGIAR, partnership at all levels


CONSORTIUM                                                           FUND
                                              Strategy and
                  CONSORTIUM               Results Framework
                    BOARD
                                                                       FUNDERS FORUM
                                           Independent Science and
                                              Partnership Council
                  Consortium CEO
                    and Office

                                Common      CGIAR                      FUND COUNCIL
Performance




                                Services
Agreements




                      Centers              Research
                                           Programs
                                                                            Fund Office

              Partners and Stakeholders     Independent Evaluation
                                                 Arrangement




                                                                                          6
Who is the CGIAR Consortium?
CGIAR Consortium:
 who and where we are

Consortium of 15 International Agricultural
Research Centers that operate in over 150
locations world wide
Formed in 2010 as part of reform of the
CGIAR, this year celebrating 40 years, some
centers 50
Consortium Office established in Montpellier,
France in March 2011
Our Centers and Locations




      IFPRI                    World Agro-
  CIMMYT                       Forestry
       CIAT                    Bioversity
         CIP                   ICARDA
Africa Rice                    ICRISAT
        IITA                   IWMI
        ILRI                   World Fish
    CIFOR                      IRRI
Our Common Vision

Task : To reduce poverty and hunger, improve human health and
       nutrition, and enhance ecosystem resilience




Through:
   • high-quality international agricultural research
   • partnership and leadership

                                                        Photo: CGIAR
What is the comparative advantage of the
CGIAR to address these challenges?

• Primary organization with a global public mandate and funding
  for scientific research to find solutions eradicating poverty and
  hunger at global scale
• A critical mass of leading scientists with multidisciplinary
  knowledge of key agro-ecosystems, especially for the poor and
  under-served areas
• Extensive global research network, including research stations
  with strong links to farmers and national agricultural research and
  innovation systems
• 40 year track record in addressing R4D issues
• Guardian of collections of genetic resources for agriculture held in
  trust for the worlds current and future generations
Delivering on the Vision:
         CGIAR Research Programs
Main instrument for planning and conducting research
Joint Venture between the Funders and the Do’ers
Implemented by a lead center with multiple partners

Built and measured on three core principles
  1. Impact on 4 system-level outcomes, ensuring consistency
     between SRF and CRP
     •   reduced rural poverty
     •   improved food security
     •   improved nutrition and health
     •   sustainably managed natural resources
  2. Integration across CGIAR core competencies, strengthening
     synergies and avoiding overlaps
  3. Appropriate partnerships at all stages of R&D
CGIAR Research Programs (2)

Before it commences, each CRP
   • sets out expected achievements
   • clearly defines risks and assumptions
   • provides verifiable targets and indicators for progress monitoring

CRPs are approved on the basis of
   • Strategic coherence and clarity of objectives
   • Delivery focus and plausibility of impact
   • Quality of science
   • Quality of research and development partners, and partnership
     management
   • Appropriateness and efficiency of CRP management
   • Accountability and financial soundness
   • Efficiency of governance
Progression




    Center
                                    Consortium
                                                     One
               Initiatives

                              CRP
                                             Fund
                                                    Voice
    Partners
                             Center



        Past                    Current             Future
Components




                             CGIAR
                         System Level
                     (e.g. Fund, Cons, ISPC, IEA)
                     Resources, Science
                        Evaluation
     Partnership                                        Partnership
                      CONSORTIUM
                           (Shared Voice)
                     Strategy, Services
                          Leadership                    Center
        CRP
    Research Focus                                  Staffing, Partners
                                                      Infrastructure
                           Partnership
Fundamental changes to CGIAR research

For the first time in the CGIAR history, the 15 centers
have a common strategy to guide their research

The CGIAR will function as a unified system based on
research programs

The centers will collaborate with each other and with
partners in pursuit of shared outcomes
Strengthening Linkages in AKS


•   Focusing on crossing the divide – between sectors, cultures, institutions, levels.
    Partnerships are critical. Communications and Governance key in partnering.
•   Working to strengthen and re-establish strong and innovative linkages along
    impact pathways with several key sectors
     – Farmers and those that serve them (extension, SMEs)
     – National Governments, NARS and regional research partners
     – Civil Society and NGOs that serve farmers, their communities and the
        environments they interact with
     – Private Sector – large, medium and small, including entrepreneurs and local
        business serving the farmer. Multiple sectors
     – Academic institutions of the North and South, including technical training of
        the trainers of adults and youth
     – Donor funded research and value-chain initiatives
•   Shifting from supply driven to demand and value chain driven research
•   Holistic and participatory approaches, sensitive to diversity, society, environment
•   Leverage ICT and other collaborative tools
Thank-you

More Related Content

PPTX
P3.1 Working with National Innovation Pilot Learning Sites and Inter-regional...
PPT
P3.1. Establishing effective livelihood research partnerships for impact at s...
PPTX
C1.2. Direct investment in farmers'led research
PDF
Poster 1: About PABRA
PPTX
CGIAR and IFAD: Sharing and Scaling up Innovations?
PDF
Scra Pd Gwss Dec 2008 Public
PDF
EFARD Business and Technical Meeting 2015 - GFAR Governance
PPTX
Jennifer Mulik - PACT, Kenya
P3.1 Working with National Innovation Pilot Learning Sites and Inter-regional...
P3.1. Establishing effective livelihood research partnerships for impact at s...
C1.2. Direct investment in farmers'led research
Poster 1: About PABRA
CGIAR and IFAD: Sharing and Scaling up Innovations?
Scra Pd Gwss Dec 2008 Public
EFARD Business and Technical Meeting 2015 - GFAR Governance
Jennifer Mulik - PACT, Kenya

What's hot (8)

PDF
CGIAR ICT Roadmap
PDF
Nestlé Waters - Bussines for Social Responsability
PDF
CGMap and Ongoing Research: Putting CGIAR Research on the Map
PPTX
Programme de recherche du CGIAR sur les animaux d’élevage et les poissons : P...
PPT
White paper and CRP6: Co-learning on Impact Evaluation Design in NRM Research...
PDF
K mb caura webinar 120214
PPTX
Leading change
PPTX
APAARI Webinar with Universities on Capacity Development for Agricultural Inn...
CGIAR ICT Roadmap
Nestlé Waters - Bussines for Social Responsability
CGMap and Ongoing Research: Putting CGIAR Research on the Map
Programme de recherche du CGIAR sur les animaux d’élevage et les poissons : P...
White paper and CRP6: Co-learning on Impact Evaluation Design in NRM Research...
K mb caura webinar 120214
Leading change
APAARI Webinar with Universities on Capacity Development for Agricultural Inn...
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PDF
G ri sp gcard funders forum oct 24 3
PPTX
Realizing the Vision to End Childhood Hunger
PPTX
BFBM(12-2016) B2B Magazine 4th Anniversary
PDF
Shah-Institutional_reform_for_water_use_efficiency_in_agriculture12Apr12
PDF
Conceptualizing Drivers of Change for Improved Food Security Policies
PDF
Vestibular 2014 UFPE - ASCES
PPTX
交點高雄vol.22 - grace wang - 尋根之路
PDF
Tandoh-Offin.GIMPA.CV
PPT
Portal Of Public Services Of Russian Federation (Psir V2)
PPTX
Budget 2012
PDF
Viet Nam, Reform efforts to reduce administrative burdens - Ngô Hải Phan
PPTX
TUPOKSI & PROKER OSIS SMAN 1 PATI
PPT
Peningkatan Peran dan Fungsi DPRD dalam Bidang Anggaran, Legislasi dan Pengaw...
PPT
GWP South East Asia Supporting Institutional reform for better Water Resource...
DOCX
About chinese language
PPTX
中国的食品保障 | China's Food Security
PPTX
Public Sector Reform: Challenges and Prospects in Ghana and Beyond
PDF
GBC - General Broach Sales Brochure (Chinese)
PPT
Agricultural Development Poverty Seminar
PDF
Origins of the Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning, Communities of Practice (...
G ri sp gcard funders forum oct 24 3
Realizing the Vision to End Childhood Hunger
BFBM(12-2016) B2B Magazine 4th Anniversary
Shah-Institutional_reform_for_water_use_efficiency_in_agriculture12Apr12
Conceptualizing Drivers of Change for Improved Food Security Policies
Vestibular 2014 UFPE - ASCES
交點高雄vol.22 - grace wang - 尋根之路
Tandoh-Offin.GIMPA.CV
Portal Of Public Services Of Russian Federation (Psir V2)
Budget 2012
Viet Nam, Reform efforts to reduce administrative burdens - Ngô Hải Phan
TUPOKSI & PROKER OSIS SMAN 1 PATI
Peningkatan Peran dan Fungsi DPRD dalam Bidang Anggaran, Legislasi dan Pengaw...
GWP South East Asia Supporting Institutional reform for better Water Resource...
About chinese language
中国的食品保障 | China's Food Security
Public Sector Reform: Challenges and Prospects in Ghana and Beyond
GBC - General Broach Sales Brochure (Chinese)
Agricultural Development Poverty Seminar
Origins of the Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning, Communities of Practice (...
Ad

Similar to Institutional Frameworks, Experience with CGIAR reform (20)

PPTX
Experience with CGIAR Reform by LLoyd le Page, CEO CGIAR
PDF
Cgiar capacity strengthening note oct12
PPTX
GFAR and the GCARD: Transforming Agricultural Research for Development - Mo...
PDF
Gcard 2012 funders forum_ccafs_rgecheverria
PDF
Capacity needs assessment nairobi re sakss-workshop-4-12-2012
PPTX
Update on monitoring and evaluation and impact assessment component 3.3
PDF
Briefing paper National Food Security - CGIAR Research Program on Livestock ...
PPT
Aquatic agriculture systems crp 1.3
PPTX
Institutional Frameworks, Experience with CGIAR reform (PPT format)
PDF
Collective action in CGIAR capacity development
PPTX
imGoats research strategy
PDF
Community of Practice for Pro-Poor Livestock Development (CoP-PPLD). Strategi...
PPTX
Developing capacity for change to enhance the potential of investment into ag...
PPTX
Activity Plan For MilkIT : Brainstorming
PDF
IITA R4D: Implication of CGIAR reform on research and operations
PPTX
Innovation Platforms for Value Chain Development: Experiences from Ghana and ...
PPTX
Building a Community of Practice and leveraging Collaboration towards shared ...
PPTX
Knowledge Management in Agricultural Research in the CGIAR and CIAT: lessons ...
PPTX
C2.1. The Tropical Agriculture Platform.
PDF
Rijsberman gcard2 foresight
Experience with CGIAR Reform by LLoyd le Page, CEO CGIAR
Cgiar capacity strengthening note oct12
GFAR and the GCARD: Transforming Agricultural Research for Development - Mo...
Gcard 2012 funders forum_ccafs_rgecheverria
Capacity needs assessment nairobi re sakss-workshop-4-12-2012
Update on monitoring and evaluation and impact assessment component 3.3
Briefing paper National Food Security - CGIAR Research Program on Livestock ...
Aquatic agriculture systems crp 1.3
Institutional Frameworks, Experience with CGIAR reform (PPT format)
Collective action in CGIAR capacity development
imGoats research strategy
Community of Practice for Pro-Poor Livestock Development (CoP-PPLD). Strategi...
Developing capacity for change to enhance the potential of investment into ag...
Activity Plan For MilkIT : Brainstorming
IITA R4D: Implication of CGIAR reform on research and operations
Innovation Platforms for Value Chain Development: Experiences from Ghana and ...
Building a Community of Practice and leveraging Collaboration towards shared ...
Knowledge Management in Agricultural Research in the CGIAR and CIAT: lessons ...
C2.1. The Tropical Agriculture Platform.
Rijsberman gcard2 foresight

More from CGIAR (20)

PPTX
Gendered youth transitions to adulthood in the Drylands: Implications for tar...
PPTX
Power through: A new concept in the empowerment discourse
PPTX
Friends, neighbours and village cereal stockists: hope for non-hybrid seed ac...
PPTX
Seed security and resilience: Gender perspectives
PPT
Gender dynamics in formal seed systems in Sub-Saharan Africa and worldwide le...
PPTX
Reflections on gender transformative approaches in agriculture – The promise ...
PDF
Culture, choice and action in legume seeds systems in East and North Uganda
PDF
Gender differentiation of farmers' knowledge, trait preferences and its impac...
PDF
Commodity corridor approach: Facilitating gender integration in development r...
PPTX
Gender and food systems research: Key lessons from the Canadian International...
PPTX
Revisiting women's empowerment through a cultural lens
PPTX
Integrating gender in aquaculture and small scale fisheries agri-food systems...
PPTX
Learning to work as a farming family team: Farmer responses to a gender-inclu...
PDF
Building gender equity from the bottom up in agricultural communities
PPTX
The role of paid and unpaid labour on sorghum and finger millet production in...
PPTX
Scrutinizing the 'feminization of agriculture' hypothesis: trajectories of la...
PPTX
Rural transformation, empowerment, and agricultural linkages in Nepal
PPTX
Intra-household decision-making processes: What the qualitative and quantitat...
PPTX
Developing measures of freedom of movement for gender studies of agricultural...
PPTX
Building intellectual bridges and shared agendas / Strategy and example: gend...
Gendered youth transitions to adulthood in the Drylands: Implications for tar...
Power through: A new concept in the empowerment discourse
Friends, neighbours and village cereal stockists: hope for non-hybrid seed ac...
Seed security and resilience: Gender perspectives
Gender dynamics in formal seed systems in Sub-Saharan Africa and worldwide le...
Reflections on gender transformative approaches in agriculture – The promise ...
Culture, choice and action in legume seeds systems in East and North Uganda
Gender differentiation of farmers' knowledge, trait preferences and its impac...
Commodity corridor approach: Facilitating gender integration in development r...
Gender and food systems research: Key lessons from the Canadian International...
Revisiting women's empowerment through a cultural lens
Integrating gender in aquaculture and small scale fisheries agri-food systems...
Learning to work as a farming family team: Farmer responses to a gender-inclu...
Building gender equity from the bottom up in agricultural communities
The role of paid and unpaid labour on sorghum and finger millet production in...
Scrutinizing the 'feminization of agriculture' hypothesis: trajectories of la...
Rural transformation, empowerment, and agricultural linkages in Nepal
Intra-household decision-making processes: What the qualitative and quantitat...
Developing measures of freedom of movement for gender studies of agricultural...
Building intellectual bridges and shared agendas / Strategy and example: gend...

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Convolutional neural network based encoder-decoder for efficient real-time ob...
PDF
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles – August ’25 Week III
PPT
Module 1.ppt Iot fundamentals and Architecture
PPTX
Build Your First AI Agent with UiPath.pptx
PDF
Developing a website for English-speaking practice to English as a foreign la...
PDF
Produktkatalog für HOBO Datenlogger, Wetterstationen, Sensoren, Software und ...
PPTX
AI IN MARKETING- PRESENTED BY ANWAR KABIR 1st June 2025.pptx
PPTX
TEXTILE technology diploma scope and career opportunities
PPTX
Microsoft Excel 365/2024 Beginner's training
PDF
A contest of sentiment analysis: k-nearest neighbor versus neural network
PPTX
2018-HIPAA-Renewal-Training for executives
PDF
How ambidextrous entrepreneurial leaders react to the artificial intelligence...
PPTX
Final SEM Unit 1 for mit wpu at pune .pptx
PDF
Comparative analysis of machine learning models for fake news detection in so...
PPTX
Modernising the Digital Integration Hub
PDF
A proposed approach for plagiarism detection in Myanmar Unicode text
DOCX
search engine optimization ppt fir known well about this
PPTX
MicrosoftCybserSecurityReferenceArchitecture-April-2025.pptx
PDF
OpenACC and Open Hackathons Monthly Highlights July 2025
PDF
Consumable AI The What, Why & How for Small Teams.pdf
Convolutional neural network based encoder-decoder for efficient real-time ob...
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles – August ’25 Week III
Module 1.ppt Iot fundamentals and Architecture
Build Your First AI Agent with UiPath.pptx
Developing a website for English-speaking practice to English as a foreign la...
Produktkatalog für HOBO Datenlogger, Wetterstationen, Sensoren, Software und ...
AI IN MARKETING- PRESENTED BY ANWAR KABIR 1st June 2025.pptx
TEXTILE technology diploma scope and career opportunities
Microsoft Excel 365/2024 Beginner's training
A contest of sentiment analysis: k-nearest neighbor versus neural network
2018-HIPAA-Renewal-Training for executives
How ambidextrous entrepreneurial leaders react to the artificial intelligence...
Final SEM Unit 1 for mit wpu at pune .pptx
Comparative analysis of machine learning models for fake news detection in so...
Modernising the Digital Integration Hub
A proposed approach for plagiarism detection in Myanmar Unicode text
search engine optimization ppt fir known well about this
MicrosoftCybserSecurityReferenceArchitecture-April-2025.pptx
OpenACC and Open Hackathons Monthly Highlights July 2025
Consumable AI The What, Why & How for Small Teams.pdf

Institutional Frameworks, Experience with CGIAR reform

  • 1. Institutional Frameworks Experience with CGIAR reform Lloyd Le Page, CEO CGIAR Consortium OECD Conference on Agricultural Knowledge Systems
  • 2. Background of the CGIAR • Formed in 1971 due to serious concerns about global hunger – India, Pakistan and other Asian countries teetered on the brink of famine. • Formed on the basis of convincing evidence that agricultural science was a powerful instrument for combating hunger. Dramatic increases in agricultural productivity possible through: – widespread adoption of new, high-yielding rice and wheat varieties, – Combines with increased use of fertilizers, irrigation and other inputs, in what came to be celebrated as the Green Revolution. • Humanitarian concern, mixed with science-based conviction, brought together the agricultural researchers and development donors who created the CGIAR. • Shared objective was to extend the early gains made possible by modern agricultural science by developing a workable formula for mobilizing resources to support research on a “long-term continuing basis”
  • 3. Since early beginnings, the CGIAR System had evolved to become increasingly complicated with multiple donors, center, crop and national priorities 3
  • 5. Desired outcome of CGIAR Reform FROM TO Clear vision with focused priorities that respond to Mission creep and trying to do everything global development challenges Duplicative mandate of the Centers without clear Centers that collaborate, work toward the System System-wide vision and strategy for impact agenda and priorities, and deliver impact Complex and cumbersome governance and lack of Streamlined and effective System-level governance accountability with clear accountability Static partnerships that are not enabling scalable Strong and innovative partnerships with NARS, the impact and research adoption private sector and civil society that enable impact Lack of coordination among investors Strengthened, coordinated funding mechanisms that are linked to the System agenda and priorities Declining core resources Stabilization and growth of resource support Greater impact on food security and poverty reduction 5
  • 6. In new CGIAR, partnership at all levels CONSORTIUM FUND Strategy and CONSORTIUM Results Framework BOARD FUNDERS FORUM Independent Science and Partnership Council Consortium CEO and Office Common CGIAR FUND COUNCIL Performance Services Agreements Centers Research Programs Fund Office Partners and Stakeholders Independent Evaluation Arrangement 6
  • 7. Who is the CGIAR Consortium?
  • 8. CGIAR Consortium: who and where we are Consortium of 15 International Agricultural Research Centers that operate in over 150 locations world wide Formed in 2010 as part of reform of the CGIAR, this year celebrating 40 years, some centers 50 Consortium Office established in Montpellier, France in March 2011
  • 9. Our Centers and Locations IFPRI World Agro- CIMMYT Forestry CIAT Bioversity CIP ICARDA Africa Rice ICRISAT IITA IWMI ILRI World Fish CIFOR IRRI
  • 10. Our Common Vision Task : To reduce poverty and hunger, improve human health and nutrition, and enhance ecosystem resilience Through: • high-quality international agricultural research • partnership and leadership Photo: CGIAR
  • 11. What is the comparative advantage of the CGIAR to address these challenges? • Primary organization with a global public mandate and funding for scientific research to find solutions eradicating poverty and hunger at global scale • A critical mass of leading scientists with multidisciplinary knowledge of key agro-ecosystems, especially for the poor and under-served areas • Extensive global research network, including research stations with strong links to farmers and national agricultural research and innovation systems • 40 year track record in addressing R4D issues • Guardian of collections of genetic resources for agriculture held in trust for the worlds current and future generations
  • 12. Delivering on the Vision: CGIAR Research Programs Main instrument for planning and conducting research Joint Venture between the Funders and the Do’ers Implemented by a lead center with multiple partners Built and measured on three core principles 1. Impact on 4 system-level outcomes, ensuring consistency between SRF and CRP • reduced rural poverty • improved food security • improved nutrition and health • sustainably managed natural resources 2. Integration across CGIAR core competencies, strengthening synergies and avoiding overlaps 3. Appropriate partnerships at all stages of R&D
  • 13. CGIAR Research Programs (2) Before it commences, each CRP • sets out expected achievements • clearly defines risks and assumptions • provides verifiable targets and indicators for progress monitoring CRPs are approved on the basis of • Strategic coherence and clarity of objectives • Delivery focus and plausibility of impact • Quality of science • Quality of research and development partners, and partnership management • Appropriateness and efficiency of CRP management • Accountability and financial soundness • Efficiency of governance
  • 14. Progression Center Consortium One Initiatives CRP Fund Voice Partners Center Past Current Future
  • 15. Components CGIAR System Level (e.g. Fund, Cons, ISPC, IEA) Resources, Science Evaluation Partnership Partnership CONSORTIUM (Shared Voice) Strategy, Services Leadership Center CRP Research Focus Staffing, Partners Infrastructure Partnership
  • 16. Fundamental changes to CGIAR research For the first time in the CGIAR history, the 15 centers have a common strategy to guide their research The CGIAR will function as a unified system based on research programs The centers will collaborate with each other and with partners in pursuit of shared outcomes
  • 17. Strengthening Linkages in AKS • Focusing on crossing the divide – between sectors, cultures, institutions, levels. Partnerships are critical. Communications and Governance key in partnering. • Working to strengthen and re-establish strong and innovative linkages along impact pathways with several key sectors – Farmers and those that serve them (extension, SMEs) – National Governments, NARS and regional research partners – Civil Society and NGOs that serve farmers, their communities and the environments they interact with – Private Sector – large, medium and small, including entrepreneurs and local business serving the farmer. Multiple sectors – Academic institutions of the North and South, including technical training of the trainers of adults and youth – Donor funded research and value-chain initiatives • Shifting from supply driven to demand and value chain driven research • Holistic and participatory approaches, sensitive to diversity, society, environment • Leverage ICT and other collaborative tools