Integrating Climate into our Strategy

MAY 2016
Integrating
Climateinto our Strategy

Integrating Climate into our Strategy - 3

A CONVERSATION WITH PATRICK POUYANNÉ Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Total 05
THREE QUESTIONS FOR PATRICIA BARBIZET Lead Independent Director of Total 10
Shaping Tomorrow’s Energy 11
THE CHALLENGES OF THE 2°C SCENARIO 12
ADVOCATING FOR CARBON PRICING 16
ENCOURAGING A COLLECTIVE APPROACH 17
THREE QUESTIONS FOR CHRISTIANA FIGUERES Executive Secretary of the UNFCCC 18
Taking Action Today 19
INTEGRATING CLIMATE INTO OUR STRATEGY 20
OUR FUTURE PRODUCTION MIX 22
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS IN OUR OPERATED SCOPE 23
LIMITING METHANE EMISSIONS 24
A RESILIENT PORTFOLIO 26
A SOLAR LEADER 28
SOLAR SOLUTIONS FOR ACCESS TO ENERGY 29
BIOFUELS: NEW PRODUCTION CAPACITY 30
PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE ENERGY USE 31
Preparing for the Future 33
A CONVERSATION WITH PHILIPPE BAPTISTE Senior Vice President, Scientific Development at Total
AND FRANÇOIS BADOUAL Chief Executive Officer of Total Energy Ventures 34
Our Figures 37
CONTENTS

Total at a Glance
4 - Integrating Climate into our Strategy
USD 7.4 billion
forecasted spending
on R&D between 2015
and 2019
including 25% on cleantechs
and environmental issues
No. 4
oil and gas company
worldwide
2.3 Mboe/d produced in 2015,
of which approximately 50% gas
Refining & Chemicals:
a global top 10
integrated
manufacturer
A top 3
solar player
6 GW installed
European leader
in biofuel marketing
2.2 Mt of biofuels blended
into gasoline and diesel in 2015
4million
customers served
each day, including
2 million in Africa
19%
decrease in greenhouse
gas emissions since 2010
in our operated scope
96,000employees
in 130+ countries
A global energy leader
Responsible growth

Did COP21 live up to your expectations?
COP21 was definitely a watershed. There will be
a “before” and “after” COP21. Despite the current
instability worldwide, 195 countries managed to unite
around an ambitious climate agreement. That sends
a strong message. What’s more, businesses were also
galvanized; the drive and energy extended far beyond
the negotiations between governments.
Another positive sign: around 40 countries and regions
have already introduced a carbon pricing mechanism
or are considering doing so, and that the agreement
includes mechanisms to link the different pricing
systems. That’s something Total strongly advocates.
Steering investment in the private sector is vital
if we want to keep global warming under 2°C.
Putting a price on CO2
is the most efficient financial
mechanism to change the rules of the game quickly.
A CONVERSATION WITH
PATRICK POUYANNÉ
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Total
“Our ambition for Total
in 2035 is consistent
with the IEA’s
2°C scenario”

It’s a must in the energy sector. The main priority
is to reduce the use of coal, which generates more
emissions that any other type of energy, and to
switch to gas and renewables for power generation.
A carbon price of USD 30 to USD 40 per ton would
make this possible.
Will the Paris climate agreement change Total’s
strategy?
The agreement confirms that we were right to make
climate a cornerstone of our strategic vision. We have
been taking practical steps since 2000 to reduce
the impact of our activities. We were among the first
in our industry to publish quantified improvement
objectives. Since 2008, we have applied an internal
carbon price to our projects and in 2011 began investing
significantly in renewable energies. This strategic
approach has taken shape gradually. And this year
we’re taking a decisive step by creating a combined
Strategy Climate Division, because climate,
a global concern, must be fully integrated into
our overarching strategy.
In the energy sector, the “COP21 effect” also means
that businesses are becoming far more proactive.
Here at Total, we have lobbied strongly for international
initiatives, such as the Oil Gas Climate Initiative,
that will reshape our industry.
Our stakeholders are voicing higher expectations,
understandably so. We called for this climate agreement
and have made commitments to support it. Now it’s time
for us to step up and explain how our strategies tangibly
reflect this engagement.
Is this report a means for Total
to respond to these expectations?
Yes, and its appropriateness was discussed
and approved by the Board of Directors. The report
has three main goals. First, to share our ambition
for Total in 2035: we have chosen a timeline that is
consistent with the International Energy Agency’s
(IEA) 2°C scenario. Second, to specify how this
scenario impacts our decision-making process. And
third, this report is an opportunity
to review the actions we have already implemented,
the initiatives we are currently undertaking, the
investments we are planning to secure for the future
and the indicators we use to track our performance.
What are Total’s objectives for 2035?
Is climate change the company’s biggest challenge?
Keeping the global temperature rise below 2°C is
a challenge everyone must meet. The next 20 years
will be decisive in building a low-carbon future that
does not curb economic and social development.
In 2040, the global population is projected to be
9 billion. That includes 2 billion people in Africa
alone, where over 600 million people today do not
have access to electricity. That figure worldwide
is 1.2 billion.
I believe our main responsibility is to help provide
safe, affordable energy solutions to as many people
as possible, while managing energy consumption
and the related emissions. Doing this will entail
improving energy efficiency across the board,
optimizing the fossil fuel mix and accelerating
the development of renewable energies. Our ambition
is to position Total as a global leader in these three
priority areas and drive progress. Our integrated
business model, which spans producing, refining
or processing and marketing oil and gas, will be
our biggest advantage in achieving this goal.
It enables us to take action across the entire energy
value chain and keeps us in touch with our customers’
expectations. The challenge is not just to produce
an energy mix that generates fewer emissions.
We also have to continue reinventing our relationships
with customers worldwide, by keeping pace with
changes in energy use, adopting digital technology
and adapting to macro-trends such as urbanization.
“Our stakeholders
understandably have
higher expectations”

“We intend to deploy
an assertive strategy
in gas, which will
grow over the next
20 years”
I am also convinced that being “the most African
international oil company” is another one of
our strengths. Africa, where these challenges are
crucial, will lead the way in energy innovation.
We intend to be the responsible energy major
that meets these challenges. We are, after all,
“Committed to Better Energy.”
Will oil and gas still be Total’s core
business in 2035?
Under the 2°C scenario, oil and gas will still make up
almost 50% of the primary energy mix at that time.
So yes, of course, we will still be an oil and gas major,
meeting this demand. But our ambition is to put
our talent to work to become the leader in responsible
oil and gas, while also ramping up renewables.
We will increase the proportion of gas in our mix,
because it is the fossil fuel with the lowest emissions.
It already accounts for more than half of our reserves
and roughly half of our production. We intend to deploy
an assertive strategy in gas, which will grow over
the next 20 years.
We will emphasize downstream investment
to accelerate the growth in gas demand. In our
operations, we are aiming to become a benchmark
for safety and environmental responsibility well
before 2035. Our safety record has steadily improved
over the last decade, but we can still do better.
From an environmental standpoint, advancements
include reducing routine flaring at our facilities
by 67% between 2010 and 2015. We aim to eliminate
it completely by 2030. That’s setting the bar high,
but we will meet this commitment. And as we promote
gas, we are closely tracking methane emissions
to reduce them as much as possible.
When you’re dealing with a 2°C trajectory, strict
investment discipline is vital. Our focus is on projects
that can withstand low oil prices and higher carbon
costs. It’s the best way to protect against the risk
of stranded assets.
Lastly, preparing for the future means speeding up
the development of carbon capture, use and storage
technologies. We therefore plan to allocate
up to 10% of our RD budget to this area over
the coming years.

How important will renewable energies be in Total’s
portfolio in 2035?
Extremely important! Our ambition is summed up
by the motto “20% in 20 years.” We want to make
renewable energies a genuine and profitable growth
driver accounting for around 20% of our portfolio
in 20 years’ time.
Over the coming decades, the growth in electricity
demand will outpace global energy demand.
Achieving the 2°C scenario hinges on using renewables
to generate power. This is one opportunity for us.
We believe, however, that electricity will not be able
to meet all requirements, particularly those related
to transportation. Electric cars will continue to gain
ground, but we must not overlook trucks, aircraft
and ships. That is why, in addition to increasing
the use of electricity and gas in transportation,
we also believe biofuels offer another renewables
opportunity we can leverage.
Our experience gives us a clear advantage. We have
been producing biofuels for over 20 years and are
the top marketer in Europe. We aim to build on
our front-ranking position in biodiesel and biojet fuel:
by next year, our La Mède refinery in France will have
been transformed into a world-class biorefinery.
“Our ambition
is to have renewables
make up 20%
of our portfolio
in 20 years’ time”

Through our affiliate SunPower, we are a top three
solar player. The challenge will be to maintain that
position and to successfully expand our operations —
especially in Africa, which is likely to leapfrog
to distributed generation based on renewable energies.
Already deployed in over 30 countries, our Total access
to energy solar program provides us with valuable
experience in understanding the challenges ahead.
Moreover, the simultaneous growth of gas and
renewables is encouraging us to take a broader
approach to the end-to-end electricity value chain.
We want to develop a renewable power trading business.
We are also positioning ourself in energy storage
with our recently announced acquisition of Saft.
Lastly, we will be reexamining the potential of other
renewable energies, in particular onshore wind power.
However, we will not include any nuclear activity
in our portfolio.
Energy efficiency is a major 2°C scenario driver.
What are your objectives in this area?
We want to do much more to help our customers.
Their attitudes and behaviors in terms of reducing
energy costs and their environmental impact
are changing fast. And this trend is going to pick up
speed with digital technologies.
We want to innovate to bring
our customers new products
and services that will help
them make informed choices
about energy and manage
their consumption. Promoting
hybrid solutions combining oil
or gas and renewables is one
avenue; another is providing
energy efficiency services
for industrial sites. Our goal
is to cover the manufacturing
and transportation sectors.
We are a leading energy company
recognized for both our closeness
to customers and as a committed
partner. We intend to build on
this valuable asset.
You have set some very ambitious
goals. Where do the changes
need to start?
It is vital for our stakeholders
and for us that we clarify
our position and share our ambition
for the next 20 years. It’s not
a shift, it’s a genuine ramp-up.
But I know we can succeed,
because this transformative
project reflects the aspirations of
everyone at Total and their desire
to find meaning in what they do.
Rising to the challenges of the
2°C scenario is so important
that we have no other choice
than to be ambitious.

THREE QUESTIONS FOR
PATRICIA BARBIZET
Lead Independent Director of Total
You were appointed lead
independent director of Total
on December 19, 2015. What
does your role involve?
The lead independent director
helps to ensure efficient governance
of the company in accordance
with current practice. This role
is considered to be useful by many
investors and proxy advisory firms
when the positions of Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
are combined, as is the case
at Total since the management
transition led by Patrick Pouyanné.
My responsibility is to ensure that
the Board of Directors runs smoothly
and follows its rules of procedure.
As Chairwoman of the Governance
Ethics Committee, I’m also
in charge of leading the review
of the Board’s work and preventing
conflicts of interest. And, along
with the Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, I’m a primary
contact for shareholders.
You have been a Total director
since 2008. How has the Board
of Directors’ approach to climate
issues changed over time?
The Board has always taken
climate issues seriously. But what
has changed significantly over
the years is their importance
in Total’s strategy. In 2008,
climate issues were treated as
a completely separate environmental
risk requiring measures to reduce
the footprint of its activities.
More recently, these issues have
been fully integrated into the
company’s business and strategic
vision. Today, Total’s long-term
strategy is built on addressing
climate-related challenges.
What work has the Board
undertaken in this area since 2015?
In 2015, as every year, the Board
of Directors examined climate
issues during its review of the
strategies for Total’s business
segments, presented by their
respective senior executives.
Mr. Pouyanné also brought us up
to date on the work carried out
as part of the Oil Gas Climate
Initiative, in particular the meeting
held in Paris in October 2015
that brought together the chief
executives of the leading oil and gas
companies that have committed
to fighting climate change. The Audit
Committee also carries out more
detailed work on environmental
risks during its review of the
performance indicators published
by Total in its management report.
These indicators are audited by
an independent external organization.
In addition, starting this year
the Compensation Committee
has changed the criteria for
the Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer’s variable compensation
to put more emphasis on achieving
HSE and CSR objectives.
The Board is fully committed
to climate issues and this
commitment will continue to support
Total’s development in 2016. That
is why we endorsed the company’s
suggestion of publishing this
Climate Report to coincide with
the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting.
“The Board
of Directors supports
the publication
of this report”
A STRONGER LINK TO THE CHAIRMAN
AND CEO’S COMPENSATION
In 2015, the portion relating to the HSE/CSR
performance criteria taken into account
when calculating Mr. Pouyanné’s variable
compensation was set at a maximum
of 16% of his base salary. For 2016,
the Board of Directors increased
this portion to 30%, with 20% tied
to safety performance and 10% to CSR
performance. The latter is measured based
on the achievement of targets for carbon
emissions, energy efficiency and Total’s
position in the rankings published
by non-financial rating agencies.

Energy is at the heart of the challenges we face to keep the global
average temperature rise below 2°C. What mechanisms can be put
in place and what conditions favor success?
We are helping to effect this transformation and are actively involved,
both within our industry and in the broader international community,
in shaping tomorrow’s energy.
Shaping
Tomorrow’s
Energy
SECTION 1

Source: IEA, CO2
Emissions from Fuel Combustion, 2014 Edition.
1
For the purposes of this report, “2°C scenario” refers to the pathways outlined
in the 450 and 2°C scenarios published by the IEA in World Energy Outlook
and Energy Technology Perspectives, respectively.
These scenarios aim to limit the average global temperature rise above pre-industrial
levels to 2°C by 2100.
31%
COAL
23%
OIL
14%
GAS
7%
INDUSTRY
11%
AGRICULTURE
14%
OTHER
49 (±10%)
Gt CO2
-eq
2010
The Challenges
of the 2°C Target
A CLOSER LOOK
The world economy must be profoundly reshaped to keep
the average global temperature increase below 2°C. Energy,
which represents nearly 70% of global greenhouse
gas emissions, is a key factor in the balancing act required.
This reduction in emissions entails sharply decreasing the carbon content
(or “carbon intensity”) of GDP. In its 2°C scenario, the IEA estimates that
a decline of 3 to 4% a year would be required between now and 2035.
OIL AND GAS ACCOUNT
FOR 37% OF GREENHOUSE
GAS EMISSIONS RELATED
TO HUMAN ACTIVITY
- Roughly 85% of emissions related to
oil and gas are generated during
product end-use; the remaining 14%,
during production and refining.
The Facts
- Global greenhouse gas emissions amounted to 49 Gt CO2
-eq in 2010.
- If current trends were to continue, cumulative global emissions would reach
around 75 Gt CO2
-eq in 2035.
- The IEA’s 2°C scenario1
aims to limit emissions to approximately 35 Gt CO2
-eq
in 2035.

Source: IEA – World Energy Outlook 2015
20352015
2015e
150
200
250
300
350
400
100
50
0
25%
18%
24%
27%
31%
22%
23%
7%
7%
4%
3%
4%
10%
4%
4%
10%
8%
21%
5%
5%
5%
1%
2%
3.5 °C 2 °C
29%
(switch from coal to gas, development of CCUS, nuclear etc.)
Approx. 1/3 - More renewable energies
Approx. 1/3 - More energy efficiency
Approx. 1/3 - Optimized energy mix
Business as usual
2°C scenario
Today
Solar, wind and other renewablesSolar, wind and other renewables
Modern biomass
Hydropower
Traditional biomass
Nuclear
Gas
Oil
Coal
Mboe/d
Three Areas of Focus
In the 2°C scenario, the IEA outlines three areas of focus to alter the energy-related
CO2
emissions trajectory.
Energy Mix
Creating an Energy Mix
That Meets the 2°C Challenge
The first challenge is to reduce the
share of coal. Under the 2°C scenario,
it will shrink from 28% to 18%
between 2015 and 2035. Oil and gas
will account for 46% of the “target”
2°C mix for 2035, versus 52% today.
All fossil fuels are not equal. For an
equivalent energy content, gas emits
around half as much CO2
as coal
on average when used for power
generation. Consequently, the share
of gas is expected to continue to
grow — by around 15% over the
period — to 22% of the 2035 energy
mix, overtaking coal. The share of oil
will begin to decline gradually, to 24%
in 2035 from 31% today, because
it will be reserved primarily for
transportation and petrochemicals.
The share of renewables will soar over
the same period, to 22% from 8%,
excluding traditional biomass.
This growth will be led by a surge
in solar and wind power, which could
both help to replace coal despite
the disadvantage of their variability,
along with “modern” biomass.

Growth in Gas Production Based on the 2°C scenario
billion cubic feet per day
Similarly, additional spending will also be required to meet oil demand in 2035.
Given the natural decline of output, the volume of production from new oil
projects in 2035 is forecast to be 75% of 2010 production, even under the
2°C scenario.
330
410
2035
Natural
(IEA 2°C scenario)
New
projects
2010
decline
Meeting the 2°C target will be based in large part on continuously improving
energy efficiency and targeting energies more effectively in line with uses.
Gas and renewables are therefore expected to be primarily dedicated to
power generation, replacing coal and, to a lesser extent, heavy fuel oil.
The use of oil will have to be concentrated on transportation and petrochemicals,
sectors in which it remains indispensable. But other energies — electricity,
gas and renewables in particular for transportation — will play an increasingly
important role.
The use of renewables will expand rapidly. But their deployment at a global scale
will, in fact, take place in stages. The transportation sector, which currently
accounts for over 55% of oil demand, is an example of this. According to
the 2°C scenario, biofuels and electricity will grow at a faster pace between
now and 2035, but will only meet a small portion of transportation demand.
Continuing to Develop Oil and Gas
Production Capacity
Substantial investment is needed to meet higher projected demand
for gas in 2035. Given that the natural decline in production
is averaging around 4% a year, the volume of production from
new gas projects in 2035 is forecast to be 90% of 2010 production,
even under the 2°C scenario.
INVESTMENT REQUIRED
According to the IEA, some USD 7.5 trillion
and USD 11.1 trillion need to be invested
in the gas and oil sectors respectively
over the next 20 years. This represents
increases of 41% and 23% compared to
average annual investment in these sectors
between 2000 and 2013.

Source: IEA – World Energy Investment Outlook 2014.
as well as carbon pricing.
The IEA puts oil demand over
the period 2014-2035 at 690 billion
barrels. Although discovered reserves
currently stand at approximately
1.7 trillion barrels, the agency believes
that about one-third of demand over
the next two decades will be met by
fields yet-to-be developed or yet-to-
be found.
The 2°C scenario means that oil
companies need to allocate their
investments to assets that will be
competitive — in other words,
with reasonable costs.
Carbon Capture, Use and Storage
The 2°C scenario also includes a significant ramp-up
in the coming decades of carbon capture, use and storage
(CCUS) technologies, which will be needed to achieve
carbon neutrality in the second half of the century.
Total has long been committed to developing CCUS
technology, in particular through the Lacq pilot project
carried out between 2010 and 2013 involving oxy-fuel
combustion capture followed by storage in a depleted
reservoir. We systematically examine the possibility
of reinjecting CO2
from the fields we produce and are
looking at ways to use it to enhance oil recovery.
Based on our experience, we feel that further RD is
required in a variety of areas, including the maturity of
capture technologies, carbon use, technical feasibility
at the scale of current needs, and reducing the cost of
these technologies. To that end,
we will allocate up to 10% of our
RD spending for CCUS. We have
also begun working alongside our
peers within the Oil Gas Climate
Initiative on commerciality issues,
capture technologies and global
storage capacity.
Breakdown of Global Oil Production
Under the 2°C scenario
Taking Positions
in Competitive Resources
The reserves that have already
been discovered, and especially
those yet to be found, will not
necessarily be fully developed.
Whether or not they can be will
depend on a number of factors:
demand, production conditions
(profitability, political context
and environmental issues),
Crude oil
Fields yet-to-be found
Fields yet-to-be developed
Currently producing
Other unconventional oil
Light tight oil
NGLs
Enhanced oil recovery
Mb/d
In the next two decades, around one-third of demand will be met by yet-to-be developed
or yet-to-be found fields.

Advocating for
Carbon Pricing
Clear economic signals over the medium to long term are vital
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
LOBBYING ETHICS CHARTER
We have adopted a lobbying ethics charter
that is published on our website. It governs
our practices and ensures that our publicly
stated positions are consistent with those
conveyed through our lobbying, either
directly or indirectly, through professional
organizations or associations. The consensus
required by these organizations does not
always reflect our position. In such cases,
we believe that it is preferable to promote
our ideas from within by working to convince
our peers of our position, rather than leave
the discussions. Our participation in these
organizations, beneficial in many ways
including sharing of best practices, does
not prevent us from publicly defending our
positions, even when they differ from those of
the organizations to which we belong. In the
event of a difference, Total’s position prevails.
Mindful of the need to be fully transparent
on climate-related issues, we are committed
to publishing a list of all of the professional
organizations and associations of which
we are a member.
We encourage the development of linked carbon pricing mechanisms
in the main economic regions.
A price of between USD 30 and USD 40 per ton would be enough to:
- Promote the switch from coal to gas; gas emits only half as much CO2
as coal in power generation.
- Steer investment toward the technologies required to reduce emissions,
such as carbon capture, use and storage.
Around 40 regions and countries and 20 cities have already implemented
a carbon pricing mechanism or are planning to do so1
.
Generally speaking, clear rules are needed to support the transition
to a lower-carbon economy. They must provide information on public
policy, facilitate long-term investment and prevent unfair competition.
International carbon credit mechanisms must also be maintained
and/or implemented to foster the development of projects offering
the highest emissions cuts at the lowest cost.
We participate constructively in discussions with the public authorities,
associations and our peers to share our ideas and recommend solutions.
2008 2014 2015 2016
We begin factoring a carbon
price of €25 per ton into
our investment decisions.
We support the U.N.
Global Compact’s Business
Leadership Criteria
on Carbon Pricing.
We help to deploy the World
Bank’s Carbon Pricing
Leadership Coalition.
We review our internal carbon
price, setting it at between
USD 30 and USD 40 per ton,
depending on the price of oil.
Paying for Carbon: Total and
six other leading oil and gas
companies call on the international
community to implement
carbon pricing mechanisms.
Long-Standing Involvement
We have campaigned for the introduction of carbon pricing since 2008.
1
More generally, several countries that have filed their Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDC) have declared that they are in favor of market mechanisms.

The industry-driven Oil Gas
Climate Initiative (OGCI) was
announced during the United Nations
Climate Summit in New York on
September 23, 2014. The Initiative
currently has 10 members, all major
international companies, that together
represent around 20% of global
oil and gas production.
The CEO-led OGCI aims to catalyze
collective action by those most
committed to addressing climate
change and to advance technological
solutions through collaborative
programs. As a founding member,
we engaged fully in the initiative’s
launch and development. We are
working with our peers to further
topics such as the role of natural gas;
carbon capture, use and storage;
carbon reduction instruments
and mechanisms; and long-term
energy solutions.
In October 2015, following their
initial work, the chief executives
of the member companies met
with a panel of prominent experts
to discuss major political, scientific
and economic issues related to
climate change and agree on
the added efforts that would need
to be made by our industry.
After calling for an ambitious COP21
agreement in its first report, the
OGCI and its members welcomed
the successful outcome of the
negotiations and defined a working
program for this year based on
three main priorities:
- Creating a shared roadmap to reduce
emissions in line with the 2°C target.
- Conducting carbon capture,
use and storage RD.
- Developing a global database
and effective measurement tools
for methane emissions.
Encouraging a Collective Approach
The response to the 2°C scenario challenges must also
be collective. Two in particular require public and private
sector participation: eliminating routine flaring and
managing methane emissions. To speed up progress,
we are actively involved in these areas, through
international organizations and initiatives.
TOTAL ALSO SUPPORTS THE
FOLLOWING ORGANIZATIONS
AND INITIATIVES
- The World Bank’s Zero Routine Flaring
by 2030 initiative
- The Climate and Clean Air Coalition’s
Oil Gas Methane Partnership
- The U.N. Global Compact’s
Caring for Climate initiative
- The Paris Pledge for Action to limit
the average global temperature rise
to less than 2°C
- The French Business Climate Pledge,
a commitment by 39 French companies
to combat climate change
- A Coalition to Contribute to Universal Access
to Energy, bringing together 25 international
businesses and organizations
- The Terrawatt Initiative, which brings together
key players in the private sector to promote
affordable solar energy around the world
10 Companies Committed to the Climate

What was the biggest win
at COP21?
There were many significant wins
at COP21, but perhaps the most
powerful expression of determination
was the Paris Agreement that set
a final destination or end point
of efforts to reduce emissions.
Governments agreed to reestablish
the ecological balance of the planet
by agreeing to drive down emissions
so low that by the second half of the
century all greenhouse gas emissions
can be safely absorbed by natural
systems such as forests or soils.
It’s what we have to keep in mind
in our business planning. For the
energy sector it means moving
very quickly from high-carbon
to low-carbon and eventually to
zero-carbon business models.
What is key to a successful
transformation?
The required pace of transformation
means that everybody needs to be
doing much more, faster. The oil and
gas sector has identified some of
the things that they can and should
be doing. One is investing in carbon
capture, use and storage. As a whole
we’re not investing enough into this;
it’s still very expensive and
the progress is disappointingly
slow, both in terms of reducing
costs as well as increasing the
safety of storage.
The second urgency is investing
in renewables. Total has adopted
the vision to move into renewables
and to integrate gas and renewables
in a holistic way. There is much
to be done in that field and it is
critical that this happens fast.
The third area is the elimination
of methane emissions.
How can industry work with
governments to advance action?
Nothing will be done unless there
is a good collaboration between
government and the private sector
including governments providing
the necessary incentives, and
private sector boldly moving forward.
Some 60 jurisdictions have put
carbon pricing in place, but we don’t
have a carbon price everywhere,
which would be enormously helpful.
We have actually undervalued
every ton of CO2
, and that has
huge costs. We have to begin to
act very differently and understand
that for every ton of CO2
that we
do emit, we have to get much more
productivity out of it. In fact,
by some estimates we should
be increasing the productivity
of each ton by a factor of 15.
One of the problems is that the
private sector has not provided
a consistent signal to governments:
on the one side, some companies
put pressure on governments not
to establish carbon policies and
on the other side, there is an invitation
to move to a level playing field.
The oil and gas industry in particular
has a huge opportunity to give one
consistent voice to governments.
It is in the oil and gas sector’s interest
to increase the pace while also
deploying its amazing technological
engineering skills to push forward
innovations and solutions to the
challenges of this, rather than the
last, century.
“The energy sector
needs to move
very quickly.”
3 QUESTIONS FOR
CHRISTIANA FIGUERES
Executive Secretary of the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change

Conscious of the part we play, we take action across our value chain
to reduce our impact on the climate and promote the responsible use
of energy.
What actions have we already implemented?
Where do we stand in relation to our objectives?
How are we taking into account the implications of the 2°C scenario
for the oil and gas market?
Taking
Action
Today
SECTION 2

Deploying an assertive strategy in gas,
while limiting methane emissions
P. 24-25
Selecting and developing safe,
environmentally responsible,
competitive oil and gas projects
P. 26
Expanding carbon capture,
use and storage technologies
P . 34-36
Publicly supporting the implementation
of carbon pricing mechanisms
P. 16
Encourage sector initiatives and collectively
engage to address climate issues
P. 17
Integrating Climate
into our strategy
2°C ROADMAP
Improving the Carbon Intensity
of Our Production Mix
Become the responsible energy major “More than 60% gas
in our hydrocarbon production mix in 20 years’ time.”
Exiting the coal business
We ceased coal production following the sale
of our affiliate Total Coal South Africa in August 2015.
We will also be withdrawing from coal marketing
by the end of 2016.

Developing
Renewable Energies
“20% renewables in 20 years’ time”
A STRATEGY COMMUNICATED
TO SHAREHOLDERS
In February 2016, during the full-year 2015
results presentation, Patrick Pouyanné
outlined the key points of Total’s strategy,
built on a 2°C roadmap.
Improving
Energy Efficiency
Promote responsible
energy use in our operations
and by our customers
Growing as a top three solar
player by expanding our activities
across the photovoltaic chain,
including distribution
P . 28-29
Developing bioenergies
P . 30
Adding energy storage
to our businesses
P . 29
Promoting access to energy
P . 29
Continuing our efforts
to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions at our facilities
P. 23 and 31
Providing solutions
(products and services)
to encourage responsible
energy use by our customers
P . 32
A NEW STRATEGY CLIMATE
DIVISION
In 2016, strategy and climate are being
combined in a single division as part of
an organizational renewal.
Group strategy integrating 2 °C roadmap
Sustainable business model
EXCERPT FROM THE 2015 RESULTS PRESENTATION
Focusing on oil projects with low breakevens
Prioritizing gas projects
Exiting coal business
Growing in renewables and biofuels
* International Energy Agency 450 ppm scenario

1
The carbon intensity of our primary energy production mix is the ratio between:
- CO2
emissions across the entire life cycle of products, limited to the year in question if necessary
- primary energy production related to these products during the year in question.
We express carbon intensity in kgCO2
/toe of primary energy.
Intensity of Total’s production mix
2°C scenario intensity
A Target Consistent
with the 2°C scenario
Carbon Intensity of Total’s Primary Energy Mix
Versus the Energy Mix Outlined in the 2°C scenario*
base 100 IEA 2010; ranges determined by the emissions factors selected and Total’s energy mix scenarios
* With the methodological support of French carbon strategy consultant Carbone 4, which also conducted an audit.
This methodology is still under development.
Integrating climate issues into our strategy goes beyond reducing emissions
at our facilities. It also involves gradually decreasing the carbon intensity1
of our production mix. We take the 2°C scenario into account in our strategy.
To do this, we compare the change in the carbon intensity of our projected
growth profile for primary energy production to the change in carbon intensity
under the 2°C scenario, on a like-for-like energy basis (coal, oil, gas, solar,
wind power and biofuels).
Our Production Mix for 2035
2010
Gas + Oil: 44-56%
Renewables: 0%
Coal: 2%
2015
Gas + Oil: 48-52%
Renewables: 3%
Coal: 0%
2035 Ambition
Gas + Oil: More than 60% gas
Renewables: 20%
Coal: 0%

20102005 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
14
16
10
8
6
4
2
0
-51%
20102005 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
-19%
MtCO2
-eq
Refining Chemicals
Exploration Production
1- Change in GHG Emissions
per segment within the operated scope
2 - Change in Flaring
(operated scope, excluding start-up flaring)
Volume of gas flared (Mcu. m/d)
Our Operated Scope
We continue to cut greenhouse gas
emissions in our operated scope
by focusing on two main areas:
- Reducing routine flaring
in our production activities.
- Improving energy efficiency
at our facilities.
Zero Routine Flaring by 2030
We have long been committed
to reducing routine flaring.
In 2000, we pledged that this
practice would be eliminated
in new developments.
In addition, we worked with the
World Bank to create and launch
the Zero Routine Flaring by 2030
initiative bringing together oil and
gas companies, producing countries
and international institutions
to support flaring reduction.
We were the first company
to adhere to the initiative, in 2014.
To achieve this goal, we set an
objective to reduce routine flaring
by 80% from the 2010 baseline
over the period 2010-2020.
Between 2005 and 2015, we reduced
flaring, excluding initial start-up,
at our operated facilities by more
than 50%.
A New Energy Efficiency Target
for Our Facilities by 2020
We have reduced our net primary
energy consumption by over 10%
in 10 years, and by 3% since 2010.
Energy efficiency is a key factor
in improving our financial,
environmental and industrial
performance. Since 2010, it has
improved by more than 6%.
In early 2016, we set a new
target of an average 1% per year
improvement in the energy efficiency
of our facilities from 2010 to 2020,
despite the increasingly complex
operating environment.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Down 19% since 2010
In 2015, our direct greenhouse gas emissions amounted to 42 MtCO2
-eq
in our operated scope, down 19% from 2010.
Our emissions can be broken down as follows: 46% from our Exploration
Production segment and 53% from our Refining Chemicals segment.
The Marketing Services segment accounted for around 1%.
The three main sources of these emissions are fuel combustion (59%),
industrial processes (19%) and flaring (18%).
OPERATED VS. NON-OPERATED SCOPE
Operated scope reporting reflects the
efforts we undertake regarding the assets
we operate. For non-operated assets
— those in which we have a working
interest only — we responsibly challenge
environmental performance.
For almost 10 years, we have published our improvement
objectives and reported on our achievements annually, listing
the difficulties encountered and outlining our future actions.

Natural gas will play a pivotal role in the fight against climate
change. Substituting natural gas for all coal used in power
generation would reduce global CO2
emissions by approximately
5 billion tons per year1
, or around 10%. However, increasing
the share of gas in the energy mix must go hand-in-hand
with limiting methane emissions.
Methane’s global warming potential is higher than that of carbon dioxide.
To maintain the advantage gas offers over coal in terms of reduced greenhouse
gas emissions when used in power generation, methane emissions associated
with its production and transportation must be limited.
Methane emissions in our operated scope stood at 2.3 Mt CO2
-eq in 2015.
Nearly half, or 1.1 Mt CO2
-eq, were specifically related to gas production.
In all, they account for less than 0.5% of Total’s marketed operated production.
Improving methane measurement and mitigating these emissions are
environmental priorities for Total.
GHG Emissions
(operated scope): 42 Mt CO2
-eq in 2015
Direct Emissions of Methane (CH4
)
associated with Total’s production of gas
(operated scope): 1.1 Mt CO2
-eq in 2015
Limiting
Methane Emissions
1
Source: IEA – CO2
Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2014.
0.1%
Flaring
Diffuse emissions
Processes

In 2015, we carried out studies with CIRAIG4
comparing
the use of coal and gas for power generation. They found
that, over the full life cycle, gas emits around half as much
greenhouse gas as European domestic coal. This proportion
is unvarying even in the case of coal-fired plants equipped
with supercritical steam generators. Despite genuinely
improved efficiency, the gap in emissions between gas
and coal is not significantly narrowed.
If coal-fired and gas-fired plants with the same capacity
were combined with a carbon capture and storage solution,
the amount of carbon to be captured, transported and
stored would still only be half as much for the gas-fired unit.
The electricity generated by the gas-fired plant would be
more cost-competitive, despite the higher cost of capture
due to the more diffuse concentration of emissions.
This would remain the case even when carbon storage
facilities were located at some distance from the emissions
sites or if storage capacity were limited.
Removing Uncertainty Surrounding
Global Data
Reliable data is crucial to industry-wide progress
on this issue.
Global methane emissions are primarily extrapolated
from U.S. data. Additional estimates that are
more representative of global production are required
to reduce uncertainty where emission calculations
are concerned.
In 2014, we decided to step up our involvement
in this field by becoming one of the first members
of the Climate Clean Air Coalition2
Methane Partnership
between governments and industry to improve methane
emission measurement and control methods.
In addition, in 2016, the OGCI plans to launch
a program to improve knowledge of methane
emissions in the oil and gas industry beyond
the United States and to help develop reliable,
low-cost continuous emissions detection
technologies for facilities.
2
CCAC, promoted by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
and the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), a U.S.-based nonprofit
environmental advocacy group.
Advantages of Gas Over Coal
2015 CIRAIG Study
margin of uncertainty
In addition, on average, gas-fired power plants have a
much faster restart time and can build up to full capacity
twice as fast as coal-fired plants. Pending the development
of electricity storage capacity to meet demand, these
advantages make gas-fired plants the ideal solution to
partner renewables to offset their variability.
4
International Reference Centre for the Life Cycle of Products Processes and Services,
Polytechnique Montréal engineering school in Canada.
Power Plant Comparison
kgCO2
-eq/MJ of electricity
Shale gas
Coal
Conventional
natural gas
Liquefied
natural gas
Gas Coal Nuclear
Minimum restart time
(hours)
Ramp up (%/minute)
1-3 hrs. approx. 5 hrs. approx. 10 hrs.
8-10%/min. 2-4%/min. 3-5%/min.

In today’s challenging production environment, we are prioritizing
our projects and focusing on moderately priced production
and processing assets that meet the highest environmental
and safety standards.
On that basis, in 2015 we decided to reduce our exposure in Canada’s
oil sands, which are particularly expensive to develop and operate.
We also confirmed that we do not conduct oil exploration or production
operations in the Arctic ice pack.
In addition, to ensure the viability of our projects and our long-term
strategy with regard to climate change issues, we apply an internal
CO2
price of USD 30 to USD 40, depending on the oil price scenario
or the actual price if it is higher in a given country, when evaluating
our investments. This is consistent with our support for mechanisms
to replace coal with gas in power generation and our investment
in RD on low-carbon technologies.
Studies have shown that a long-term CO2
price of USD 40
per ton1
applied worldwide would have an impact
of around 5% on Total’s discounted present value
(upstream and downstream assets2
). Our portfolio can
therefore be considered resilient under such a scenario.
1
Effective from 2021, or the current price if higher in a given country.
2
Sensitivity calculated for a crude oil price of USD 60 to USD 80 compared to a reference scenario
that includes a CO2
price in regions already covered by carbon pricing mechanisms.
The 2°C scenario highlights the fact that a part of
the world’s fossil fuel resources cannot be developed.
Total’s growth strategy takes this into account.
A Resilient Portfolio

The models produced by the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)1
anticipate
increasingly significant natural impacts
over the coming decades as the global
temperature gradually increases. We assess
the vulnerability of our facilities to these events,
which include rising sea levels, hurricanes,
flooding and droughts.
In accordance with generally accepted
practices, we take the risk of natural disasters
into account when designing industrial facilities.
These risks can be climate-related; they can
also include seismic, tsunami, soil strength
and other risks. Meteorological and, where
applicable, oceanographic measurements taken
on site are supplemented by satellite data and
climate models. These data are used to develop
statistics describing normal operating conditions
and extrapolate extreme, centennial and over
10,000-year conditions. Facilities are designed to
withstand both normal and extreme conditions,
by building in appropriate safety margins.
In addition, our internal procedures specifically
call for the systematic assessment of the
possible repercussions of climate change
on our future projects. In-depth studies
are carried out when the potential risk is
significant relative to the existing safety margin.
Our analyses include a review by type of risk
— sea level, storms, temperature change and
melting permafrost, among others. They also
take into account the life span of our projects
and their capacity to gradually adapt.
To date, these studies have not identified
any facilities that cannot withstand the
consequences of climate change.
With our partners, we also conduct studies
focusing on a given region or topic.
For example, through the CASE2
consortium,
we took part in a study led by RPSEA3
on how climate change affects hurricanes
in the Gulf of Mexico. We are also involved
in the European Union CLIM4ENERGY project,
to better understand the potential effects of
climate change on our North Sea platforms.
Additionally, we lead an IPIECA4
task force
focused on best practices and adapting oil
and gas facilities to climate risk.
1
The IPCC brings together several hundred international researchers
and is the acknowledged authority on climate science.
2
Climatology and Simulation of Eddies.
3
Research Partnership to Secure Energy for America.
4
The global oil and gas industry association for environmental
and social issues.
Facilities That Can Withstand Natural Disasters

A Solar Leader
As a top-tier energy player, we view our contribution to developing
new energies as both a strategic choice and an industrial
responsibility. Through our affiliate SunPower, we rank among
the top three globally in the solar industry and are expanding
across the entire value chain.
Total designs and manufactures photovoltaic
cells, build utility-scale solar power plants
and market integrated solar solutions
for distributed power generation.
Our affiliate SunPower is currently the global
leader in solar technology. Its Maxeon®
solar cells are the best in the market,
with a conversion efficiency of 25%.
Solar panels equipped with this technology
produce 1.7 times more energy than
conventional panels of the same size.
Lowering manufacturing costs and improving
photovoltaic cell conversion efficiency will
enhance the competitiveness of solar energy
without subsidies. This is already the case
in around 20 countries, and this trend is
expected to continue driving market growth
of over 10% a year. Consequently, SunPower
plans to triple its manufacturing capacity
in the coming years to meet this demand.
Supporting this growing market is part of
our strategy to increase the share of renewables
in our portfolio to 20% in 20 years.
DEVELOPING WORLD-CLASS
SOLAR FARMS
Connected to the grid in mid-2015,
the Solar Star Projects in California
can power 255,000 homes with
its 1.7 million panels. In doing so,
it avoids CO2
emissions equivalent
to the amount generated by a city
the size of Buenos Aires.
Continuing its strategic development,
in March 2016 SunPower announced
a partnership with ISE Group to build
photovoltaic solar power plant in Japan
with more than 80,000 panels to supply
electricity to over 8,900 homes via
the regional power grid.
6 GW+
deployed worldwide

Solar Solutions
for Access to Energy
Preparing the Solar Energy
of the Future
To gradually build an innovative offering to help
customers optimize their consumption, SunPower
has made several acquisitions in the energy
management and storage sectors. As part of this
“Smart Energy” strategy, it recently introduced
a new service that includes onsite solar energy
production for facility needs and is also planning
to expand into smart energy management,
storage and distribution to the grid.
After more than a decade of
examining ways to provide access
to energy in our host countries,
in 2011 we launched a program
to market distributed solar solutions
in growth countries.
Against a backdrop of fast-paced
energy demand in emerging
economies, these solutions meet
the needs of communities with
little or no access to the grid.
The use of a renewable, modern and
reliable source of energy also avoids
emissions associated with the use
of the traditional energy sources
that they are replacing.
At the end of 2015, the Awango
by Total range of solar solutions
for lighting and cell phone charging
was available in over 30 countries
in Africa and in Asia, providing
access to electricity to more than
6 million people.
Based on a social business model,
i.e. one that both addresses
a social problem and is financially
self-sustainable, we continue
to expand our range of products
by testing broader energy services
with the help of multiple partnerships
with large multinational institutions
and small local businesses alike.
For example, we are looking at
products that make it possible
to use several sources of light,
fans and televisions, clean cooking
options, new distribution models
and financing solutions such as
“pay as you go” schemes.
Our ambition is to provide access
to energy to
25 million
people in Africa by 2020
Million people
ENERGY STORAGE:
TOTAL PLANS TO ACQUIRE SAFT
“As part of Total, Saft will spearhead our growth in the electricity
storage sector,” commented Patrick Pouyanné, Chairman and CEO
of Total. “The acquisition of Saft is fully aligned with our ambition
of growing in renewable energies and electricity, a process initiated
in 2011 with the acquisition of SunPower. Saft is an industrial
flagship recognized globally for its technological know-how.
It develops innovative, competitive solutions for its customers.
Saft will allow us to add electricity storage solutions to our portfolio,
necessary to the future growth of renewable energies.”
30
20
10
0
People Reached by Our Access
To Energy Program
Africa
Rest of the World

To make our La Mède site in southern France sustainably competitive,
we plan to convert some of its units to manufacture 500,000 tons of biofuels
a year — mainly biodiesel, but also biojet fuel and feedstock for bioplastics —
starting in 2017.
A high-quality biodiesel, hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO), will be manufactured
primarily from used oils, as well as renewable feedstock, thanks to new French
technology developed by IFP Énergies Nouvelles and marketed by its affiliate
Axens. The HVO’s specifications comply with the sustainability criteria set out
in the E.U.’s Renewable Energy Directive, known as RED1
.
To eventually diversify the sources and types of biomass used, the biorefinery
is being designed to treat all types of oil.
1
Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. Starting January 1, 2017,
the greenhouse gas emission savings resulting from the use of biofuels must be 50% compared with the use of
a reference fossil fuel, versus 35% today.
Biofuels:
New Production Capacity
As a leading refiner, we are continuing to responsibly
adapt our production base in Europe, against a backdrop
of structural decline in demand for petroleum products.
The fast-expanding biofuels market offers new opportunities.
As a producer with over 20 years of experience and
the leading marketer in Europe, we are well positioned
to expand in this energy segment.
BIOTFUEL,
A PILOT UNIT
FOR ADVANCED BIOMASS
We are developing advanced biomass
conversion processes on a commercial scale.
To achieve this, we form RD partnerships
and acquire interests in start-ups working
in the field.
After five years of RD, construction
of the BioTfueL pilot plant has begun at
our Dunkirk site in France. Production
is set to begin in the first quarter of 2017.
The project, which was launched with
five European partners, aims to develop
an innovative process to gasify biomass,
such as agricultural by-products and forest
waste, to produce high-quality biodiesel
and biojet fuel.
LA MÈDE
A World-Class Biorefinery in France
A Closer Look
Transportation accounts for almost one-quarter of energy-related
greenhouse gas emissions and two-thirds of final oil consumption.
Under the 2°C scenario, demand for liquid fuel for transportation
is expected to remain relatively stable to 2035. The projected
20% drop in oil demand will mainly be offset by increased use of biofuels.
At present, biofuels only account for 3% of global energy supply,
but production is forecast to double over the next 10 years,
particularly since the European Union is targeting 10% renewables
in the transportation sector in 2020.
Sources: IEA - Energy Technology 2015 – World Energy Outlook 2015 – CO2
Emissions from fuel combustion 2015.
TOTAL AND AMYRIS BIOJET USED
FOR COMMERCIAL FLIGHTS
The drop-in renewable jet fuel developed by
Total and Amyris, which contains up to 10%
blends of biocomponents, obtained ASTM
International certification in 2014, authorizing
its use in civil aviation worldwide.
Since October 2014, Air France has used
it for its demonstrations of eco-responsible
technology. The fuel was used until
January 2016 for weekly flights between
Toulouse and Paris and will power 23 flights
between Nice and Paris in May 2016.

Promoting Responsible
Energy Use
In addition to making a key contribution to achieving the 2°C scenario,
energy efficiency drives operational performance.
We continuously improve the energy efficiency of our facilities
and develop products and services to help manufacturers and consumers
optimize their energy use.
By making smart choices about equipment and innovative technologies right
from the project design phase, we have cut our energy use 10% since 2005.
By end-2016, we will have deployed energy management systems
at all our main sites. These include:
- Energy audits to assess the amount of primary energy consumed by
each site and identify where energy efficiency gains can be made.
- Energy improvement programs to reduce fuel and steam consumption
by optimizing refinery operations. These programs also assess
the potential installation of new equipment that maximizes heat transfer.
-Upgrading facilities by replacing older equipment with more efficient,
less energy-intensive equipment.
- Preparing long-term investment plans for the sites.
We are also pursuing ISO 50001 energy management certification.
In 2015, our Leuna refinery obtained certification, as did several Marketing
Services sites: the Brunsbüttel bitumen plant in Germany and the Solaize
research center, the Saint-Martin-d’Hères site and seven depots and
193 service stations in France. In the Exploration Production segment,
Total ABK in Abu Dhabi was certified in early 2016.
At our exploration and production sites, we are stepping up our efforts
by reducing the routine flaring of gas from our production activities.
Improving Our Own
Energy Efficiency
OFFSHORE
For certain offshore projects, such as
Martin Linge in the Norwegian North Sea,
the facilities are all-electric. The power
is generated onshore, then transported
to the platform via a subsea cable.
Unlike the gas turbines usually used,
this innovation means that consumption
matches the facility’s actual requirements.
REFINERIES
Since 2012, 30 energy efficiency projects
have been rolled out at our various refineries.
The €60 million invested has helped us
to save roughly 60,000 tons of oil equivalent
a year.
The redesign of the distillation unit
in Normandy in 2012, for example,
improved its energy efficiency 22%.

MORE THAN 80 PRODUCTS
AND SERVICES HAVE EARNED
THE TOTAL ECOSOLUTIONS LABEL
Under this program, we develop innovative
solutions that outperform the market standard
in terms of environmental and health impact.
In 2015, sales of Total Ecosolutions products
and services avoided 1.7 million tons
of carbon emissions across the entire
life cycle, or the equivalent of the annual
emissions of nearly 190,000 Europeans2
.
2
Source: Eurostat: 2013 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Per Capita, EU-28.
Reducing Our
Manufacturing
Customers’
Energy Bills
To meet the needs and expectations
of our customers from the
manufacturing sector, we constantly
expand our services offering
by developing the most effective
solutions to manage energy use.
To help us do this, we rely on
the expertise of TENAG, our
German joint venture, and of recently
acquired BHC Energy in France.
We offer customers solutions
to perform energy audits, deploy
energy management systems
and develop their employees’ skills
in these areas. Since 2011, our
solutions have reduced our French
customers’ energy use by 10 TWh
a year and have cut €150 million off
our German customers’ energy bills1
.
1
In Germany, reductions in our industrial customers’
consumption range from 2% a year for a water supplier
to 3% a year for a chocolate maker, a pharmaceuticals
producer and a flat glass manufacturer to 5% a year
for a textile company and up to 13% a year in the
agrifood sector.
Around 85% of greenhouse gas
emissions associated with oil
and gas occur when finished
products are used. That’s why
helping our customers reduce
their energy use is a key focus
of our efforts to curb emissions.
One way we aim to achieve this
is through an array of sustainable
transportation solutions.

New Product Ranges
to Improve Fuel Efficiency
Two years of RD went into
developing TOTAL EXCELLIUM
Next Generation fuels. Using
these fuels keeps engines cleaner,
reducing air pollutant and carbon
emissions. The entire lineup has been
awarded the Total Ecosolutions label.
The Fuel Economy lubricant range
improves fuel efficiency by decreasing
friction between engine parts.
We are also developing lubricants
that incorporate biocomponents
to deliver enhanced performance.
Materials to Make
Vehicles Lighter
We develop polymers using
proprietary processes and
formulations to provide
manufacturers with cutting-edge
materials. Polypropylene body parts
trim 100 kilograms off the weight
of a standard vehicle, reducing
fuel consumption by 0.4 liters per
100 kilometers and carbon emissions
by 10 grams per kilometer.
Partnerships to Promote
New Forms of Transportation
Attitudes, behaviors and use
are changing fast, driven by
the spread of new technologies
and the sharing economy.
We believe in the importance
of this transformation and are
teaming up with top-ranked players
in the transportation sector.
One example is our partnership
with the French start-up BlaBlaCar,
a global leader in ride sharing.
Offering Eco-Efficient
Products and Services

What are the main RD challenges associated with
the transition to a low-carbon future?
How do we make sure we have the resources we need
to innovate?
How are we investing to prepare for the future?
Preparing
for the
Future
SECTION 3

Total has aligned its vision of the future with
the 2°C scenario. What are the main challenges
involved in terms of innovation and RD?
Philippe Baptiste Access to affordable energy
unlocks development for all. Our energy
systems must continue to meet this basic need
while transforming themselves to reduce their
climate impact. As a developer of renewable
energies, our RD requirements are substantial,
ranging from their production and storage
to managing their variability. Another of our
challenges is mitigating the climate impact
of oil and gas. In the short term, improving
energy efficiency is unquestionably one of
the key ways for us to do this. But we also
need to find solutions that will allow us to
continue to use oil and gas, by reducing or
even offsetting their carbon footprint. This is
a major global issue, because these sources
of energy offer unequaled advantages,
particularly in terms of energy content, easy
storage and cost competitiveness. That’s
why we must increase our RD investments
in carbon capture, use and storage (CCUS)
technologies. What’s clear today is that there
isn’t just one energy pathway for the future,
but many. Over the past 10 years, not only have
we stepped up our RD efforts, we have also
added more fundamental research to support
our applied research. We are also more able
to tap into the innovation capabilities of start-
ups through Total Energy Ventures (TEV).
François Badoual Innovation is not just the
prerogative of big companies, academics
and major RD programs. Being an innovative
company today means being open to new
types of collaboration with start-ups and being
inspired by their agility, freedom and boldness.
Does TEV allow you to get the jump
on disruption?
FB Our focus is increasingly turning to start-ups
whose disruptive innovations can potentially
become new growth drivers. Our value-added
lies in helping them speed up the industrial
and commercial rollout of their creations.
Since 2009, we have invested USD 150 million
in 25 start-ups. Twenty-one are still active
in our portfolio and represent a host of
opportunities for the future.
Our development capital activities make it
possible to discern trends. For example,
as early as 2005, growing global climate
concerns spurred the emergence of a certain
number of cleantech solutions, first in the
biotech sector, and now, over the past four years,
in the energy storage sector. Our activities
can give us a head start and allow us to invest
in promising technologies very early on.
A CONVERSATION WITH
PHILIPPE BAPTISTE
Senior Vice President,
Scientific Development at Total
FRANÇOIS BADOUAL
Chief Executive Officer,
Total Energy Ventures
“Developing new types
of collaboration
to spur innovation”
Philippe Baptiste

Is storage the primary focus for your expansion in solar?
PB It’s an important area, but not the only one.
There’s also a lot we need to look at in photovoltaics
itself as new technologies emerge that are more efficient
for longer. But yes, storage is a major focus. It’s the key
to developing photovoltaic solar power on a large scale
— something that is true for most renewables. We know
that disruptive technologies will make an appearance,
but we don’t when or what they will be. That’s why
diversifying our options is so critical.
Bringing renewables to the grid is also becoming
a strategic way of our achieving our goal. Tomorrow’s
grids will have to be able to manage a number of
factors: diverse energy sources, such as gas and solar,
renewables’ variability, and more distributed generation
because anyone can become a producer simply by
installing solar panels on their rooftops. We need to
deepen our understanding of smart electricity systems
to optimize grid performance. Naturally, digital technology
will play a significant role.
What are you concentrating on in the area of
energy efficiency?
PB Energy efficiency is a source of continuous
improvement, because it’s also a way to make our
facilities more profitable. In the Refining Chemicals
segment, energy costs make up a significant share
of our operating expenses.
We plan to continue improving our processes and
the design of our facilities, while
looking at other, broader ways
of making our operations more
efficient. For example, there have
been some interesting reports
from eco-industrial parks where
different companies pool material
and energy flows. We are currently
working on this subject with Paris-
Saclay Energy Efficiency (PS2E),
a research and training institute
of which we are a founding partner.
We can also help customers reduce
their energy use by making our
products more energy efficient.
This is achieved through different
formulations and by developing
new molecules for our fuels and
lubricants.
FV Thanks to TEV and our investment
in the Ecomobility Ventures fund,
we can support the development
of start-ups that promote new
practices and business models
in the transportation sector.
One example is France’s OuiCar,
a peer-to-peer car sharing service.
François Badoual

Earlier you mentioned stepping up
research into carbon capture, use
and storage (CCUS) technologies.
What is the outlook in this field?
PB From a technology standpoint,
we already know how to capture
and store carbon. The main purpose
of research now is to lower costs,
which are currently too high.
Also, there is still some uncertainty
surrounding how regional and
global storage capacity is measured.
And there are major social issues
to be addressed. The successful
dialogue during our pilot project
in Lacq, France provided us with
valuable input regarding the
types of questions raised by local
communities. However, we’re still
in the very early stages of research
into carbon use. To accelerate
the emergence of technologies,
we will be committing up to
10% of our RD budget to this field.
FB There is a whole ecosystem
of start-ups dedicated to CCUS
technologies. We have invested in
Solidia, which is developing a new
cement and concrete chemistry.
Their technology can reduce the
carbon footprint of the concrete
industry by up to 70% and is
a brand-new way of using CO2
.
More generally, our support of the
2°C trajectory could help to forge
new partnerships that would provide
extremely innovative solutions
to address all climate issues.
RD spending of
USD 7.4 billiion
between 2015 and 2019, including 25%
on cleantech and environmental issues.
USD 150 million
invested in minority interests in 25 innovative
start-ups addressing the energy issues
of the future.
1,000 RD
partnerships
with other industrial companies, universities
and dedicated research organizations.
Close to
4,500 RD
employees

Our
Figures
SECTION 4
As part of our continuous improvement process,
we report our results publicly. We rely on best
reporting practices that make it easier for stakeholders
to assess our performance.

Page(s)
A CONVERSATION WITH PATRICK POUYANNÉ
ADVOCATING FOR CARBON PRICING
ENCOURAGING A COLLECTIVE APPROACH
INTEGRATING CLIMATE
INTO OUR STRATEGY
FORECASTING OUR PRODUCTION MIX
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
IN OUR OPERATED SCOPE
Topic: 1
Topic: 3 and 7
Topic: 1 and 3
Topic: 6
Topic: 9
Topic: 2
5 -9
16
17
20-21
22-23
10
CC2.2
CC2.2a
CC2.2c
CC2.2d
CC2.2c
CC2.2d
CC2.3
CC2.3a
CC4.1
CC13.1
C13.1a-b
CC13.2
C13.2a
CC2.1c
CC2.2
CC2.2a
CC2.2c
CC2.2d
CC2.3
CC2.3a-f
CC4.1
CC2.2a
CC3.1
CC3.1a-e
CC3.2
CC3.2a
CC3.3
CC3.3a-c
CC14.1
CC14.4
CC7.1-7.4
CC8.1-8.5
CC9.1
CC9.1a
CC9.2
CC9.2a-c
CC10.1
CC10.1a
CC10.2
CC10.2a
CC11.1-11.4
CC14.1
CC1.1
CC1.1a
CC1.2
CC1.2a
THREE QUESTIONS FOR PATRICIA BARBIZET
IPIECA Climate
Change Reporting
Framework
CDP Climate Change
Reporting Guidance 2016
Reporting Frameworks
Cross-Reference Table1
1
The cross-reference table above is based on IPIECA’s Climate Change Reporting
Framework, the pilot version of which was published in December 2015, and on
the CDP’s Climate Change questionnaire (Total’s full response to the questionnaire
for 2015 will be published on our website, www.total.com, on June 30, 2016).

Page(s) IPIECA Climate
Change Reporting
Framework
CDP Climate Change
Reporting Guidance 2016
A RESILIENT PORTFOLIO
LIMITING METHANE EMISSIONS
A SOLAR LEADER
BIOFUELS:
NEW PRODUCTION CAPACITY
PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE ENERGY USE
A CONVERSATION WITH PHILIPPE BAPTISTE
AND FRANÇOIS BADOUAL
INDICATORS
ASSURANCE
Topic: 4 and 5
Topic: 4
Topic: 4
Topic: 4
Topic: 4
Topic: 8
Topic: 9
Topic: 10
26-27
24-25
28-29
30
31-32
34-35
40
Registration
Document 2015,
p.159
CC2.1
CC2.1b-c
CC3.3c
CC5.1
CC5.1a-c
CC6.1
CC6.1a-e
CC2.1
CC2.1b-c
CC2.1
CC2.1b-c
CC2.1
CC2.1b-c
CC2.1
CC2.1b-c
CC3.3c
CC7.1-7.4
CC8.1-8.5
CC9.1
CC9.1a
CC9.2
CC9.2a-c
CC10.1
CC10.1a
CC10.2
CC10.2a
CC11.1-11.4
CC14.1
CC8.6
CC8.6a
CC8.7
CC8.7a
CC8.8
CC14.2
CC14.2a
CC2.2a

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
SCOPE 1 Total direct greenhouse gas emissions (operated scope) (Mt CO2
-eq) 51.6 46.3 47.0 46.0 44.3 41.8
BREAKDOWN BY SEGMENT (Mt CO2
-eq)
Upstream (E1–C3)1
26.0 22.1 23.4 23.5 22.1 19.3
Refining Chemicals (E1-C3) 25.4 24.0 23.4 22.3 22.0 22.3
Marketing Services (E1-C3) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
BREAKDOWN BY REGION (Mt CO2
-eq)
Europe (E1-C3) 25.6 23.8 22.8 22.1 21.2 22.3
Africa (E1-C3) 16.0 11.9 14.2 14.7 14.2 11.6
Americas (E1-C3) 3.7 3.9 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.8
CIS and Asia (E1-C3) 3.7 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.8 3.3
Middle East (E1-C3) 2.4 3.3 2.8 1.9 1.3 0.8
BREAKDOWN BY TYPE OF GREENHOUSE GAS (Mt CO2
-eq)
CO2
(E1-C1) 47.6 43.1 43.5 43.5 41.3 38.9
Methane – CH4
(E1-C1) 2.8 2.6 2.8 2.0 2.5 2.3
N2
O (E1-C1) 1.2 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.5
SCOPE 1 Group’s equity share of direct greenhouse gas emissions (Mt CO2
-eq) 59 53 53 51 54 50
SCOPE 2 Indirect emissions (E1-S1) (Mt CO2
-eq) 5.4 5.5 4.4 4.3 4.1 4.0
SCOPE 32
Other indirect emissions – Use of products sold (E1-S2) (Mt CO2
-eq) 630 600 560 550 550 530
Net primary energy consumption (operated scope) (TWh) (E2-C1) 157 158 159 157 153 153
Daily flaring (including routine, start-up, operational and safety flaring – operated
scope) (E4-C1) (Mcu m/d)
14.5 10.0 10.8 10.8 9.8 7.2
GHG intensity of oil and gas produced (operated scope) (kg/CO2
-eq/boe) 22.6 21.6 23.7 24.2 25.4 21.8
1
The references provided in parentheses refer to the 2015 edition of the Oil and Gas Industry Guidance on Voluntary Sustainability Reporting published by IPIECA, API and IOGP.
E(x) refers to an environmental indicator. C(x) refers to a common reporting element. S(x) refers to a supplemental reporting element.
2
For information purposes, we calculate and publish emissions related our products that undergo combustion.
We use a simplified approach that applies emissions factors to our sales, because they exceed emissions related to our production and refining operations.
This method is compliant with the oil and gas industry recommendations soon to be published in the form of a methodology guide.
Indicators

Glossary
Unit of measurement
b barrel
B or G billion
boe barrel of oil equivalent
CO2
-eq CO2
equivalent
e equivalent
Gt billion tons
GW gigawatt
k thousand
M million
Mboe/d million barrels of oil equivalent
per day
Mcu. m million cubic meters
t metric ton
TWh terawatt-hour
Definitions
Greenhouse Gas (GHG)
The six gases named in the Kyoto Protocol: carbon
dioxide (CO2
), methane (CH4
), nitrous oxide (N2
O),
hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs)
and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6
), with their respective
Global Warming Potential (GWP), as described in
the 2007 IPCC report.
Operated Scope
The activities, sites and assets operated by Total S.A.
or a company it controls, i.e. those that Total
or a Total-controlled company operates or is
contractually responsible for managing operations:
803 sites at December 31, 2015.
Operational/Non-Continuous Production Flaring
All flaring other than continuous or safety flaring.
It is usually sporadic and carried out at high intensity
for a short duration. It may occur on a planned or
unplanned basis. It includes flaring carried out during
temporary (or partial) failures of equipment used to
process gas during normal operations and lasts until
the equipment has been repaired or replaced.
Start-up Flaring
Commissioning new oil or gas production facilities
generally takes several weeks. Flaring during this
phase can take the form of each of the types of flaring
mentioned above, until normal production starts.
Acronyms
CSR Corporate Social Responsibility
HSE Health, Safety Environment
IEA International Energy Agency
IOGP International Association
of Oil Gas Producers
IPCC Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change
IPIECA The global oil and gas industry
association for environmental
and social issues
OECD Organisation for Economic
Co-operation and Development
OGCI Oil Gas Climate Initiative
RD Research and Development
USD Official abbreviation of the
United States dollar

More
Registration Document
The Registration Document presents our
activities and the financial statements for
the year just ended. In application of France’s
Grenelle II Act, social, environmental and
societal information is reported in Section 7.
This information is audited by an independent
external organization.
www.total.com/en/media/publications
Total is rolling out a new sustainability reporting and information process
this year outlining our Corporate Social Responsibility. In addition to
the Registration Document, all reporting information on this topic will be
gradually be made available on our new Sustainable Performance website.
All of our publications and the latest news and reports can still be found
on our corporate website, www.total.com.
Sustainable Performance
Total’s new website dedicated to sustainability reporting
went live in May 2016 and will be gradually updated
between now and the end of the year. The website will focus
on all of the CSR and sustainability issues we deal with,
including safety, climate change, environmental protection,
ethics, human rights and community engagement. The site
will also feature our related policies, information on our
initiatives and our performance indicators. It also makes
our response to environmental, social and governance (ESG)
reporting standards available to the public.
www.sustainable-performance.total.com

DISCLAIMER
PRINTING
DESIGN AND PRODUCTION
ILLUSTRATIONS
This report, from which no legal consequences may
be drawn, is for information purposes only. The entities
in which Total S.A. directly or indirectly owns interests
are separate legal entities. Total S.A. shall not be held
liable for their acts or omissions. The terms “Total,”
“Total Group” and “Group” may be used in this report
for convenience where general reference is made to
Total S.A. and/or its affiliates. Similarly, the words “we”,
“us” and “our” may also be used to refer to affiliates
or to their employees.
This document may contain forward-looking information
and statements that are based on business and financial
data and assumptions made in a given business, financial,
competitive and regulatory environment. They may prove
to be inaccurate in the future and are subject to a number
of risk factors. Neither Total S.A. nor any of its affiliates
assumes any obligation to investors or other stakeholders
to update in part or in full any forward-looking information
or statement, objective or trend contained in this
document, whether as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise.
Additional information concerning factors, risks and
uncertainties that may affect Total’s financial results
or activities is provided in the most recent Registration
Document, the French-language version of which is filed
with the French securities regulator Autorité des Marchés
Financiers (AMF), and in Form 20-F filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
This document was printed with vegetable ink on 100%
recycled uncoated, natural white CyclusOffset, produced
from recycled FSC-certified pulp, reducing pressure on
the world’s forests. The E.U. Ecolabel-certified paper was
produced in an ISO 14001- and FSC-certified paper mill.
The printer is certified as complying with Imprim’Vert¨,
the French printing industry’s environmental initiative.
No. FSC/C124913. The Print Time to Market®
concept
adopted means that only copies actually distributed
are printed. With Ecofolio, Total is encouraging paper
recycling. By sorting your trash you contribute to
protecting the environment.
www.ecofolio.fr
J. Barande / Ecole Polytechnique, B. Blaise, B. Cohen, Courtesy of BHE Renewables, M. Dufour,
F. Lacour, M. Roussel, P. Sittler / Rea, P. Sordoillet, UNFCCC, L. Zylberman /Graphix Images.
Mullen Lowe Paris / So Bam
Editorial Consulting: Terre de Sienne
Printing: Advence May 2016

Supplying affordable energy to a growing population, addressing climate
change and meeting new customer expectations are the three main challenges
Total must meet as an energy major.
That is what guides what we do. With operations in more than 130 countries,
we are a top-tier international oil and gas company. We are also a
world-class natural gas operator and a global solar leader through our
affiliate SunPower. Our activities span oil and gas production, refining,
petrochemicals and marketing. Demonstrating their commitment to better
energy, our 96,000 employees help supply our customers worldwide with
safer, cleaner, more efficient and more innovative products and services
that are accessible to as many people as possible.
Our ambition is to become THE responsible energy major.
Corporate Communications
Total S.A.
2 place Jean-Millier
92400 Courbevoie, France
Tel.: +33 (0)1 47 44 45 46
Share capital: €6,196,891,032.50
Registered in Nanterre: RCS 542 051 180
www.total.com
total.com

Integrating Climate into our Strategy

More Related Content

What's hot (18)

Similar to Integrating Climate into our Strategy (20)

More from Total (11)

Recently uploaded (20)

Integrating Climate into our Strategy