IRJET- Review on Restrengthening of Existing R.C Structure with Consideration of Structure Audit Report

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 08 | Aug 2019 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.34 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 909
Review on Restrengthening of Existing R.C Structure with
Consideration of Structure Audit Report
Nidhi Jejurikar1, Prof. M.C Paliwal2, Er. Avinash Kumar Singh3
1PG Student (M.Tech in CTM), NITTTR, Bhopal
2Associate Professor, DCEE, NITTTR, Bhopal
3Structural Engineer, Grammatical Infra Engineers and Consultancy Pvt. Ltd., Bhopal
---------------------------------------------------------------***----------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract- Catastrophic collapses are common in India
as builders try to omit corners by using low quality
materials, and multi-storey structures are erected with
inadequate supervision. Loss of strength, reduction in
durability and deterioration of various materials may
result in collapse of an existing structure which is
occurring at an alarming rate all over the world. Avoiding
demolishing the structures, appropriate measures are
required to improve the strength, efficiency and life of the
structures i.e. to improve its overall performance and
revive its functionality. The basic and important assessing
tool which is adopted to determine health of a building is
known as “Structure Audit” or “Structure Health
Monitoring”. Effective methods for monitoring and
evaluation of level of deterioration with ageing are Non-
destructive test methods. To increase serviceability of an
existing structure proper retrofitting practices are
employed so that better value of the structure can be
received.
Key words: Catastrophic collapse, Deterioration, Ageing,
Structure Audit, Structure Health Monitoring,
Serviceability, Retrofitting, Non-destructive testing.
1. INTRODUCTION
The prediction of the service lifetime of infrastructures
requires accuracy in prediction of the evolution of the
probability of failure with time. Recent studies have
shown that the probability of failure of infrastructure
systems increases with time with either continuous or
discrete supplements. Continuous supplements often
result from a gradual deterioration of the system
properties due to various deterioration phenomena.
Discrete supplements can be due to shocks that cause
sudden changes in the system properties which include
loads deterioration mechanisms that are active for a
short duration of time such as impact loads, seismic
events, and other man-made and natural hazards.
1.1 Need of Structural Audit
Structural Audit is the technical survey or health
examination of an existing structure which is
carried out in order to check its strength and
durability parameters. It is an aid for maintenance
and repairs of structures.
 Purpose of Structural Audit:
 To extend durability of structures
 To assess the actual condition of health of the
structures
 To inspect reliability of the structure
 To detect and highlight the critically affected
areas in order to repair them immediately
 In order to recommend rehabilitation and
retrofitting techniques
1.2 Need of Retrofitting
Retrofitting is technical intervention in structural system
of a building that improves the strength, ductility and
load carrying capacity. Strength of the building is
generated from the structural dimensions, materials,
shape, and number of structural elements, etc. Ductility
of the building is generated from good detailing,
materials used. It is also known as strengthening a
structural member for its increasing serviceable life
period.
 Performance requirements under retrofitting:
 Safety: Performance needed to ensure that the
structure does not threaten the lives of users or
persons in the surrounding area.
 Serviceability: Performance such that the structure
can be used comfortably and does not cause
discomfort exceeding allowable levels to users of the
structure and persons in the surrounding area, as
well as water tightness and other performance
requirements for structures.
 Restorability: Performance such that the structure
can be easily restored if damage is suffered during
the service life.
2. OBJECTIVE OF PROJECT
 Perform preliminary inspection or audit of the
building.

 Identify the cause and extent of distress and their
sources
 Preparation of structure audit report of the building.
 Obtaining actual service life of the building.
 Implementing retrofitting to priority elements or
repair measures if needed.
 Obtaining a cost-benefit analysis.
3. LITREATURE REVIEW
Suryawanshi Sanket Sanjay et al. (2018) have studied
that now-a-days structure gets older before their design
period by following faulty mechanism in structure. They
proceeded with visual inspection and NDT testing for a
28 years old RCC building situated in Thane, Mumbai
with G+4 Floors and their output was investigated as
structural health condition is fair. According to NDTs, it
was stated as Class 3 damage with main observation was
spalling of concrete cover and structural cracks etc
where principal repairs were required as early as
possible to avoid further deterioration of structure.
Er.Neha Goyal et al. (2018) have studied to highlight
the importance and significance of various NDTs tests
involved to be employed to find out the present
condition of RCC structures which differs in type and age.
For strength estimation in concrete Rebound hammer
test and Ultrasonic pulse velocity tester is used. For
assessment of corrosion bond of reinforcement or to
determine reinforcement diameter and concrete cover
Resistivity meter test, carbonation of concrete test,
Ferro-scan is used. Ferro-scan HILTI PS 200 was a
portable system used to detect rebar. They also stated
that relationship between hardness and strength is
dependent upon factors such as degree of carbonation,
temperature, location, surface finish etc. They also
recommended conducting these test for newly made
structures. UPV test was conducted for deciding
uniformity of concrete or to detect cracks.
Saiesh.L.Naik et al. (2017) performed structural audit
over a 49 years aged building. They stated structural
audit is the technical survey of building, a first step
towards repairing procedure of the building and also
recommended as for older buildings which was first
introduced by Indian society of structural engineers.
Also, ETABS is used for modeling and analyzing. Visual
and tapping observation was initially recorded. It was a
residential apartment with G+2 Floors having
Earthquake zone: 3, for rebar location Profometer was
used. Mainly cracks were observed due to leakage of the
water through the wall. Strength of RCC members can be
restored by polymer modified mortar method. Seepage
can be repaired by external plaster or terrace water
proofing, recasting of slab etc. So the strength and
serviceability requirement can be achieved likewise.
Anjali N Satbhai (2017) studied that structure is a
system of interconnected elements which needs to carry
loads safely. To check its safety for further use its heath
examination called structure audit is performed and also
repair and rehabilitation is suggested if necessary. It is
done to save human life, also to understand the present
condition of building. There are some basic
requirements of audit like structural and architectural
plans and details of existing building like its age, no. of
floors, materials used for construction etc. then a proper
inspection is performed visually revealing each and
every feature of building externally. Also, NDTs are
required for internal inspection after that audit report is
being prepared in a format and measures for repairs are
suggested. This is the basic procedure which is
illustrated here as a review.
Devdas Menon (2016) studied that a reinforced
concrete (RC) lighthouse at Little Andaman Island, built
during 1973-1980, was struck by the tsunami. This 45m
high cylindrical tower was badly damaged in the lower
portion, with extensive spalling and crushing of concrete
and buckling of the vertical reinforcement on one side,
and fracturing of reinforcement on the other side facing
towards sea, along with severe damage and tilting of the
RC portion structure connected to the tower at the
entrance. The remedies consisted primarily of concrete
jacketing of the lower portion of the shell structure from
outside and inside, with additional thickening on the
outside (to correct the eccentricity in vertical alignment)
and provision of additional vertical rebar’s, properly
anchored to the well cap below and the undamaged
portion above. The repaired lighthouse has safely
resisted several high intensity tremors in the region,
without any visible damage.
4. REASEARCH METHODOLOGY
STAGE I
PRELIMINARY SITE VISIT
STAGE II
INSPECTION
STAGE III
CALIBRATION AND TESTING
STAGE IV
PLANNING
STAGE V
ACTION AND IMPLEMENTATION

4.1 STAGE I
Preliminary site visit:
It helps to understand the past record of the structure in
terms of the distress and repair carried out if any. It is
also helps to assess the apparent physical condition,
robustness, structural integrity and strength of structure.
The main objective of preliminary investigation include
 To obtain the initial information regarding the
condition of structure by studying past records
based on the information obtained from the owners,
occupants of the buildings and general public.
 To get an overview of the existing state of the
structure to obtain a reliable assessment of the
available structural capacity.
 To understand the type and the seriousness of the
problems affecting the structure.
 To determine the feasibility of performing the
required repairs and rehabilitation works.
 To identify the need for detailed investigation.
 To plan the necessary site preparations,
procurement of the required field-testing equipment
and tools for sampling.
 It can be broadly classified into two headings:
Review of records and Condition survey.
 Review of record: A thorough review of data related
to design, construction and service life of the
structure is assessed in evaluating the condition of
structure. For example: The original plans &
specifications, the original design and construction
documents like design, drawings, specifications,
structural calculations, and record of modification if
any.
 Condition survey: Condition survey is a qualitative
and systematic visual inspection of the structure
which provides a fair idea about the signs of distress
and deterioration, the structural and non-structural
deficiencies, irregularities in building configuration
and construction defects.
 The criterion undertaken for surveying the sites is
based on age factor i.e. how much old the
construction is, as condition and performance of RC
structures deteriorate with age.
4.2 STAGE II
Inspection: Visual examination is probably the most
effective qualitative method of evaluation of structural
soundness. It can often provide valuable information to
the well trained eye. Visual features may be related to
workmanship, structural serviceability, and material
deterioration and it is particularly important that the
engineer is able to differentiate between the various
signs of distress which may be encountered are shown
below through respective images.
Basic steps involved are as follows:
 Mapping the site condition
 Sketching of the overall layout, include the structural
system, dimension and geometry of elements,
spacing, loading system, etc.
 Mapping of the detail structural damage, e.g.
spalling, pops-out, cracking and its pattern,
corrosion, discoloration, etc.
 Observation of deflection and displacement on the
structural elements
 Observation of the deterioration of materials.
Fig.1 Spalling of concrete
Fig.2 Corrosion action
Fig.3 Structural cracks due to loading
Fig.4Scaling of concrete
4.3 STAGE III
Calibration and Testing: Calibration refers to the act of
evaluating and adjusting the precision and accuracy of
measurement equipment.

Non-destructive testing (NDT) methods are techniques
used to obtain information about the properties or
internal condition of an object without damaging the
object. Non-destructive testing is a descriptive term used
for the examination of materials and components in such
way that allows materials to be examined without
changing or destroying their usefulness. NDT is a quality
assurance management tool which can give impressive
results when used correctly.
 Evaluation of concrete cover and reinforcement
detection by BOSCH Rebar Detector: This
instrument has a unique real-time visualization
mechanism, which works on the principle that the
steel within the concrete will be affected by a
magnetic field that is applied by the detector. The
signal received will increase with increasing bar size
and decrease with increasing cover. The instrument
is laid at the surface of column or slab and then
moved from left to right and bottom to top to get the
position of reinforcement.
Fig.5 process of reinforcement detection
 Measuring the depth of carbonation by
phenolphthalein indicator solution: Carbonation
of concrete occurs when the carbon dioxide, in the
atmosphere in the presence of moisture, reacts with
hydrated cement minerals to produce carbonates,
e.g. calcium carbonate. Carbonation penetrates
below the exposed surface of concrete extremely
slowly. When these reactions take place the pH value
will start falling. The normal pH-value of concrete is
above 13 and the pH-value of fully carbonated
concrete is below 9. It has been estimated that the
process will proceed at a rate up to 0.04in. (1mm)
per year.
Fig.6 process of carbonation of concrete
 Assessing the compressive strength of concrete
by rebound hammer: The test is based on the
principle that the rebound of an elastic mass
depends on the hardness of the surface upon which
it impinges. When the plunger of the rebound
hammer pressed against the surface of the concrete,
the spring controlled mass rebounds and the extent
of such rebound depend upon the surface hardness
of concrete. The surface hardness and therefore the
rebound is taken to be related to the compressive
strength of concrete. The rebound is read off along a
graduated scale and is designated as the rebound
number or rebound index. Mainly finds the surface
hardness of the inspected area.
Fig.7 Rebound hammer test procedure

Table.1
Comparative hardness of the cover zone
Instrument Average
rebound
number
Quality of
concrete
Rebound
hammer
readings
>40
30 to 40
20 to 30
10 to 20
<10
0
Very good
Hard layer
Good layer
Fair
Poor concrete
Delaminated
 Advantages and Limitations:
 Result is influenced by type of cement, type of
aggregate, type of surface condition and moisture
content of concrete, due to curing and age of
concrete, also due carbonation of concrete.
 Results are affected by the angle of test, surface
smoothness and mix proportions of concrete. It does
not provide a reliable prediction of the strength of
concrete. The possible error may be up to ± 25%.
 Advantages: Less expensive, produce fast results,
simple, well established, direct results, unlikely to
damage the concrete structure.
4.4 STAGE IV
Planning: Planning stage involves preparation of field
documents, grouping of structural members and
classification of damage as under in table 4.4.1:
Table .2 Classification of Damage
Class of
Damage
Repair
Classification
Condition
Observed
Repair
Requirem
ents
‘Class 0’ Cosmetic Only final
finishes, no
distress
observed
Redecorati
on, if
required
‘Class 1’ Superficial Skin alone
damaged, no
carbonation
observed
Plaster
repairs
‘Class 2’ Patch repair Minor
structural
cracks,
carbonation
depths
reached
reinforcement
level
Restore
the lost
concrete
cover,
carbonatio
n resistant
surface
protective
coating
‘Class 3’ Principal Spalling of Strengthe
repair concrete
cover, major
structural
cracks due to
corrosion
also,
reduction of
load carrying
capacity
ning
repair
‘Class 4’ Major repair Major
structural
loss,
Replacem
ent/
recasting
structural
member
4.5 STAGE V
Action and Implementation: Structure repair and
rehabilitation is a process whereby an existing
structure is enhanced to increase the probability that the
structure will survive for a long period of time and also
against earthquake forces. This can be accomplished
through the addition of new structural elements, the
strengthening of existing structural elements.
 Retrofitting is a technical intervention in structural
system of a building that improves the resistance to
earthquake by optimizing the strength, ductility and
earthquake loads.
 Retrofitting materials: Injection Grouts, Polymer
grouts, Fibre-reinforced grouts, Cement - Sand
grouts, Gas-forming grouts, Shotcrete, Fibre-
reinforced plastics, Epoxy mortar, a steel jacket,
collar, shear connectors, brackets.
Fig.8 Classification of Retrofitting

 Global retrofitting methods or structural
retrofitting (GRM): It means retrofitting of the
whole structure. The structures which are not
strengthened for seismic forces can be retrofied by
GRM such as global structural stiffening, global
structural strengthening and mass reduction.
 Local retrofitting methods or member
retrofitting (LRM): Retrofitting the deficient
elements or by improvement of connections,
member strength and component deformation
capacity. It is said to very economical as few
members are retrofied. Here it does not require to
retrofit whole structure, only it needs to modify the
deficient element up to a required strength. This can
be achieved by adding cover plates to the bottom of
beam, adding additional steel to cover the columns
called steel jacketing, provide clip angles to
strengthen connections.
 Steel Jacketing: Local strengthening of columns has
been frequently accomplished by jacketing with
steel plates. This technique is chosen when the loads
applied to the column will be increased, and at the
same time, increasing the cross sectional area of the
column is not permitted.
 Jacketing is used for purposes other than covering
the deteriorated concrete and providing lateral
confinement, such as to bear longitudinal loads,
needs special considerations. The existing column
may have undergone full shrinkage and most of the
creep and also has elastic strains due to carried
loads, whereas the shrinkage and creep of the new
material has to occur. The load transfer to jacketing
is also a big issue. It is better to use jacking to release
the load on the member before jacketing, to use non-
shrinking materials for jacketing and to hammer
steel shims at the transfer points of the jacketing
after curing.
Fig.9 Steel Jacketing of a Column
5. CONCLUSION
Generally, concrete structures are getting neglected in
every sector. We must carry out inspection and
maintenance at required period of time for every R.C
structure. Reliability and Durability of structures can be
ensured if all care as mentioned in clause can be ensured.
From the consideration of all the above points we
conclude that the defects of structural members are due
to age which leads the combined effects of carbonation,
corrosion & effect of continuous drying and wetting. The
result of visual survey prompt us to conclude the distress
level is wide spread and is an ongoing process thus need
to be stopped at this stage and proper retrofitting
measure should be designed and applied to provide
stability against any man-made or natural disaster.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
My heartfelt thanks and gratitude remains to
Grammatical Infra Engineers and Consultancy Pvt. Ltd.,
Bhopal, (M.P). And DCEE, NITTTR Bhopal.
REFRENCES
[1] Sachin Rambhau Shelke, Prof. Darshana
Ainchwar,”Structural Health Monitoring, Audit, Repair
and Rehabilitation of Building in Construction Industry”,
Vol.1, 2018
[2] IS 13311 (Part 2): 1992, Non-Destructive Testing of
Concrete – Methods of Test, Part – 2, Rebound Hammer,
Bureau of India Standards.
[3] CPWD Handbook on Repair and Rehabilitation of RCC
Structure, Central Public Works Department (CPWD),
Government, New Delhi, 2002.
[4] Er. Neha Goyal, Er. Bhavana Arora, Dr. Sanjay Sharma,
Dr. Arvind Dewangan.
[5] Handbook on Non-Destructive Testing of Concrete,
Second Edition, Edited by V.M. Malhotra and N.J. Carino,
CRC Press LLC, 2004. Volume-05, Issue-09, September
2018.
[6] Ankur M Goyal1, Tejpal Goda2, Siddharth Shah3,
Rehabilitation of RCC frame Building: Case Study of
School Building AT Bhimora, Volume 5, Issue 04, April -
2018.
[7] Sanket Sanjay Suryawanshi, Structural audit of RCC
building (Volume 4, Issue 2), 2018.

IRJET- Review on Restrengthening of Existing R.C Structure with Consideration of Structure Audit Report

More Related Content

What's hot (19)

Similar to IRJET- Review on Restrengthening of Existing R.C Structure with Consideration of Structure Audit Report (20)

More from IRJET Journal (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

IRJET- Review on Restrengthening of Existing R.C Structure with Consideration of Structure Audit Report