IRJET-Infrared Thermal Face Recognition under Temporal Variation

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 05 Issue: 01 | Jan-2018 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2018, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 6.171 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 391
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF STRENGTH PROPERTY OF CONCRETE
USING NANOSILICA
Deepika Rana1, Dr. G. P. Khare2, Mr. Dushyant Kumar Sahu3
1Student, M. Tech(Structural Engg.) GEC Jagdalpur
2Principal, GEC Jagdalpur
3Assistant Professor, GEC Jagdalpur
---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - Concrete is the most commonly used in
construction material. Concrete is the material of choice
where strength, performance, durability, impermeability, fire
resistance and abrasion resistance are required. The hunger
for the higher strength leads to other materials to achieve the
desired results and thus emerged the contribution of
Cementitious material for the strength of concrete. The
mechanical properties start showing increasing trend with
increase in the quantity of Nano-silica. The development of
construction materials technology, particularly concrete is
growing very rapidly in the presence of nanotechnology.Nano
technology finds application in various fields of science and
technology. The use of Nano materials in concrete is new
revolution. Nano materials like Nano-silica, Nano titanium
oxide, carbon Nano tubes, Nano alumina etc. which are
presently used in concrete to improve its strength properties.
The objective of this project is to study the mechanical
properties of concrete such as Compressive strength and
workability of M20 and M30 grades of concrete with theuseof
Nano silica (0%, .5%,1%, 1.5%, 2%, 2.5%) as partial
replacement of cement Specimens namely cubes are cured for
28 days in standard environment, after this curing period test
to calculate the mechanical properties of Nano silica concrete
are carried out and the results were compared with the
Normal Cement Concrete (NCC).
Key Words: Concrete, Nanosilica, Compressive strength,
Workability, Initial time, Final setting time.
1.INTRODUCTION
Concrete is the most widely used construction material in
the world with the advancement of Nano technology.
Nanotechnology has been applied to concrete production
and has the capacity of improving the performance of
concrete. In recent years, researchers have focused on the
modify of concrete quality. It has been showntoincreasethe
mechanical and durability properties of concrete leading to
development of novel and sustainable materials. However,
the application of nanotechnology in concrete technology
should go along with the availability of local materials. One
interesting material to study is Nano silica produced from
silica sand. Previous research on concrete using Nano silica
has point out that improved workability and strength of
concrete or mortar are to be expected.
Nano materials have been developed that can be applied to
concrete mix designs to study the physical and mechanical
properties of concrete. Nanotechnology is one of the most
active research areas which have wideapplicationsinalmost
all the fields.
The fundamental processes that govern the properties of
concrete are affected by the performance ofthematerialona
Nano scale. As concrete is most usable material in
construction industry it has been required to improve its
quality. Recently Nano Technology has been introduced in
Civil Engineering applications. One of the most used Nano
material is Nano Silica (NS). The advancement made by the
study of concrete at Nano scale has proved the Nano silica is
much better than silica fume used in conventional concrete.
2. OBJECTIVES:
The objectives of this research project are to study-
1. The project deals with two concrete grades M 20
and M 30.
2. Effects of Nano silica dosages on Compressive
Strength of concrete.
3. Comparison of the test results of Conventional
Concrete and Nano Silica concrete.
4. To explain the change in properties of concrete, if
any by explaining the microstructure.
5. To study the fresh and harden properties (i.e.
compressive strength, workability test) of NC with
partial replacement of cement by Nano silica in
different percentage such as 0%, .5%, 1%, 1.5%,
2%, 2.5% are evaluated.
6. After evaluating the mechanical properties for the
various mix and it is compared with the best result.
3. MATERIAL PROPERTIES
3.1. Cement:
In this experimental work, Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC)
43 grade conforming to IS: 8112 – 1989 is used. The cement
used was Ultra tech cement obtained from the local
distributors. The following properties are given in table1.

Table3.1: shown in properties of cements
DESCRIPTION Value
Specific Gravity 3.15
Normal Consistency 31%
Initial setting time 30min
Final setting time 600min or 10 hrs
Compressive strength 3-
days(MPa)
23
days(MPa)
33
days(MPa)
43
3.2 Properties of fine and coarse aggregate
Locally available natural sand with 4.75 mm maximum size
was used as fine aggregate, having specific gravity, fineness
modulus and unit weight. It is found that the sand collected
is conforming to IS: 383-1970. Aggregate retained on
4.75mm sieve are identified as Coarse. The parent concrete
is crushed through mini jaw crusher. During crushing it is
tried to maintain to produce the maximum size of aggregate
in between 20mm to 4.75mm. The physical properties of
both fine aggregate and recycled coarse aggregate are
evaluated as per IS: 2386 (Part III)-1963 and given in Table
3.2.
Table3.2: Properties of coarse aggregate and fine
aggregate.
Physical Properties of Coarse and
Fine Aggregates Physical tests
Coarse
aggregate
Fine aggregate
Specific gravity 2.65 2.60
Fineness modulus 6.72 2.81
Bulk density (kg/m3) 1540 1780
3.3. Water:
Drinkable water should be used for making concrete. Water
should be free from acids, oils, alkalis, vegetables or other
organic Impurities. Soft waters also produce weaker
concrete. Water has two functions in a concrete mix. Firstly,
it reacts chemically with the cement to form a cement paste
in which the inert aggregatesare held in suspensionuntilthe
cement paste has hardened. Secondly, it serves as a vehicle
or lubricant in the mixture of fine aggregates and cement.
3.4. Properties of Nano SiO2 :
The average size of Nano silica was found to be 236 nm from
Particle Size Analyzer, the report of which has been
presented in the Appendix. The properties of the material
are shown in Table 3.3.
Table 3.3: Properties of Nano-Silica
PROPERTIES STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
Specific Surface area (M2/gm) 200 + 20
pH Value 3.7 – 4.5
Loss On Drying @ 1050 C (%) < 1.5 % (maximum)
Loss on Ignition @ 10000 C (%) < 2.0
Sieve Residue (%) < 0.04
Tamped Density(gm/Litre) 40 – 60
SiO2 (%) > 99.80
C (%) < 0.150
Chlorides (%) < 0.020
Al2O3 < 0.030
TiO2 < 0.020
Fe2O3 < 0.003
4. PLANING FOR EXPERIMENT:
In present study experimental program was designed to
compare the mechanical properties i.e. compressive
strength, workability of concrete with M20 and M30gradeof
concrete and with partial replacement of ordinary Portland
cement (43 grade) with Nano-silicawithvariouspercentages
(0%, 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2% &2.58%). The optimised value is
determined. Comparative mechanical strength propertiesof
M20and M30 grade concretes were studied with
conventional.
Table 4.1: Batches of concrete mix
Batch A for
M20 grade
Batch B for
M30 grade
Batch C
(include both
Batch A and
Batch B)
% of
Nanosilica
A1 B1 0%
A2 B2 0.5%
A3 B3 1.0%
A4 B4 1.5%
A5 B5 2.0%
A6 B6 2.5%
This chapter represents the mathematical formulation for
concrete mix design. Analytical study is made for 150
concrete cubes with different loading. The concrete mix
design as per IS 10262-2009 is computed. To check the
constancy of concrete for each cube.Thetestperformedsuch
as workability and compressive strength is calculated.
4.1 Proposed Mix Design
Materials MIX. ‘A’ (M20) MIX. ‘B’ (M30)
Water (kg/m3) 186 186
Cement (kg/m3) 390 465
Fine Aggregate (kg/m3) 724 660
Coarse Aggregate
(kg/m3)
1186 1168
Calculated Proportions 1: 1.6. : 3.1 1 : 1.22 : 2.43
Suggested Proportions 1 : 1.5 : 3 1 : 2 : 3.5

5. TESTS ON TRIAL MIXES
[1] Slump Cone test
Table -5.1: Slump cone Test Results.
[2]Compressive Strength Test-
Table -5.2: Compressive Strength Test Results
Batch Sample
Description
Nanosilica
(%)
Compressive Strength Test (N/mm2)
7 days
Strength
28 days
Strength
(%) gain in
strength in 7
days as
compare to
28 days
A1 Conventional Nil 16.89 33.31 49.29
A2
Nano silica
0.5 14.91 32.30 53.83
A3 1.0 17.68 34.58 48.87
A4 1.5 19.02 36.51 47.90
A5 2.0 22.15 38.61 42.63
A6 2.5 20.9 36.10 42.10
B1 Conventional Nil 26.61 41.41 35.74
B2
Nano silica
0.5 25.01 40.05 37.55
B3 1.0 27.41 44.08 37.81
B4 1.5 29.02 46.12 37.07
B5 2.0 30.76 49.14 37.40
B6 2.5 28.67 47.73 39.93
5. RESULTS
The behavior of all the batches is taken as a basic study on
the modeled structure. The followingpointswereconsidered
to present a comparative study.
[1]Slump test-
Fig. 1 - Results of Slump test
The workability test is carried out by slump test for Nano
Silica shows that in graph
In the above figures, A1 to A6 indicate Batch A trial mixes
and B1 to B6 indicate Batch B trial mixes. Both A1 andB1are
conventional concrete of Batch A and Batch B respectively
and the Nanosilica content is increased in incrementof0.5%
up to 2.5%in case of the remaining batches (i.e. A2toA6and
B2 to B6). For Batch A and Batch B trial mixes, A6 batch
corresponds to 0.5% Nano silica which gives the maximum
workability whereasA6 batch corresponds2.5%Nanosilica
which gives the minimum workability. Similarly for Batch B
trial mixes, B2 batch corresponds to 0.5% Nanosilica which
gives the maximum workability whereas B7 batch
corresponds to 2.5%. Nanosilica which gives the minimum
workability.
[2]Compressive strength-
Fig. 2- Results of Compressive strength test for Batch A
Fig.3 - Results of Compressive Strength test for Batch B
In the above figures, A1 to A6 batches indicate Batch A trial
mixesand B1 to B6 batchesindicate Batch B trialmixes.Both
A1 and B1 are conventional concrete of Batch A and Batch B
respectively (i.e. with 0% Nano silica) and the Nano silica
content is increased in increment of 0.5%up to 2.5%in case
of the remaining batches (i.e. A2 to A6 and B2 to B6). For
both Batch A and Batch B trial mixes, the 7 day and 28 day
compressive strength of batches corresponding to 0.5%
Nano silica (i.e. A2 and B2) was slightly less as compared to
conventional concrete batches. A3 to A5 and similarly from
Batch Sample Description Nano Silica%
Mix
Proportions
Slump
(mm)
A1 M20 –Conventional NIL
(C:FA:CA)
1 : 1.6 : 3.1
60
A2
Nano silica
0.5 % 54
A3 1.0 % 48
A4 1.5 % 36
A5 2.0 % 29
A6 2.5 % 25
B1 M30 –Conventional NIL
(C:FA:CA)
1:1.22 :2.43
120
B2
Nano silica
0.5 % 105
B3 1.0 % 94
B4 1.5 % 82
B5 2.0 % 75
B6 2.5 % 67

B3 to B5, the values of strength increased after which it
starts to decrease as can be seen from the above graphs
6. CONCLUSIONS
a) The workability of concrete with partial replacement of
Nano silica which is decreasing by increasing the amount of
Nano silica. Nano silica absorbsthe quantity ofmixingwater,
reducing the workability.
b) The Characteristic Compressive Strength of concrete at 7
days and 28 days was found in N/mm2. For Batch A the
result shows a slight decrease in the strength with addition
of Nano silica at first. Further with addition of Nano silica
more than 0.5 %, there was an increase in the strength up to
2.0 % after which the strength again decreased. This led us
to conclude that 2.0% is the ideal silica dosage.
c) For batch A and B the percentage increase in the
compressive strength with addition of Nanosilica with 0.5%
replacement of cement workability percentage in increased
and compressive strength of specimen is decreased at 3.032
and 3.284.
d) The percentage increase in the compressive strength for
2.5% replacement of cement is decreased for both batches
after that 2% replacement of cement is increased up to
15.911 and 18.666.
Table 7.1: Percentage increase in the compressive strength
Mix Designation Mix Description Comp.
Strength
(in
N/mm2)
% Increase inthe
Compressive
Strength
A1 M20 -
Conventional
33.31 Base
A2 M20 –0.5%NS 32.30 -3.032
A3 M20 –1.0%NS 34.58 +3.182
A4 M20 –1.5%NS 36.51 +9.606
A5 M20 –2.0%NS 38.61 +15.911
A6 M20 –2.5%NS 36.10 +8.375
B1 M30 -
Conventional
41.41 Base
B2 M30 –0.5%NS 40.05 -3.284
B3 M30 –1.0%NS 44.08 +6.446
B4 M30 –1.5%NS 46.12 +11.374
B5 M30 –2.0%NS 49.14 +18.666
B6 M30 –2.5%NS 47.73 +15.262
e) Nano silica can also cover the path to reduce the cement
content in concrete than the conventional mixes while
maintaining same strength characteristics, which will lead
into the production of concrete.
REFERENCES
[1] S. Tanveer Hussain, K.V.S.Gopala Krishna Sastry(2014),
“Study Of Strength Properties Of Concrete By Using
Micro Silica And Nano Silica”, International Journal of
Research in Engineering and Technology (Volume 3).
[2] A.M. Said, M.S. Zeidan, M.T. Bassuomi and Y. Tian.
(2012).” Properties of concrete incorporating Nano-
silica”. Construction and Building Materials36,838-844
[3] Kartikeyan, B., Sumanth, K., Harshavardhan, G. and
Dhinakaran, G. (2014). “Microstructure analysis and
Strength properties of concrete with Nano SiO2”.
International Journal of Cham Tech Research, Vol.6,
No.5, pp 3004-3013.
[4] Surya Abdul Rashid et.al. (2011)” the effect of Nano
SiO2 particle on both mechanical properties
(compressive, split tensile and flexural strength) and
physical properties (water permeability, workability
and setting time) of concrete”.
[5] Byung-Wan Jo, Chang-Hyun Kim, Ghi-ho Tae and Jang-
Bin Park. (2007). “Characteristics of cement mortar
with nano-SiO2 particles”. Construction and Building
Materials 21, 1351-1355
[6] IS 10262-2009, “Recommended guidelines for
concrete mix design”, Bureau of Indian standards,
New Delhi.
[7] G. Dhinakaran et. al. (2014) analysed themicrostructure
and strength properties of concrete with Nano SiO2.
[8] Gambhir, M.L (Fourth Edition). ―Concrete Technology..
[9] IS 456-2000 - Plain and reinforced concrete - Code of
practice.
[10] IS: 383-1970. Indian Standards – Specification for
Coarse and Fine aggregate from natural source
for concrete
[11] Shetty, M.S (2012 edition). ―Concrete Technology
[12] IS: 2386-1963 (Part3). Indian Standards –Method for
test for aggregates for concrete. [13].Alirza Naji Givi
et.al. (2010) studied the size effect of nanosilica
particles.
[13] M. Young, The Technical Writer’sHandbook. MillValley,
CA: University Science, 1989.
[14] R. Nicole, “Title of paper with only first word
capitalized,” J. Name Stand. Abbrev., in press.
[15] K. Elissa, “Title of paper if known,” unpublished.

IRJET-Infrared Thermal Face Recognition under Temporal Variation

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to IRJET-Infrared Thermal Face Recognition under Temporal Variation (20)

More from IRJET Journal (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

IRJET-Infrared Thermal Face Recognition under Temporal Variation