This document discusses the ADEC and B.U.P. It outlines several sections including objectives, methodology, analysis, results, and conclusions. The objectives were to analyze the ADEC and B.U.P. programs and compare their performance. The methodology involved collecting data on key indicators from both programs. The analysis section examines the data in detail and compares the performance of ADEC and B.U.P. across several indicators. The results provide the findings of the comparative analysis and highlights where one program outperformed the other. The conclusion summarizes that while both programs had successes, ADEC showed better overall performance based on the indicators analyzed.