Three Phase Separator
Oil/gas/water three-phase separators are commonly used for well testing
and in instances where free water separates from the oil or condensate.
Can be accomplished in any type of separator by:
I. Installing either special internal baffling to construct a water leg or a
water siphon arrangement.
II. Using an interface liquid-level control.
Difficult to install in spherical separators because of their limited
available internal space.In three-phase operations, 2 liquid dump valves
are required.
Conventional Horizontal Three-Phase Separator
Factors Affecting Separation
Factors that affect separation of liquid and gas phases include:
separator operating P, separator operating T & fluid stream composition.
For a given fluid well stream in a specified separator, changes in any of
these factors will change the amount of gas & liquid leaving the separator.
An increase in operating P or a decrease in operating T increases liquid
covered in a separator. However, this is untrue for gas condensate systems.
Optimum points for both beyond which further changes won’t affect
liquid recovery.
Computer simulation (flash vaporization calculation) of well stream
phase behavior of allows finding optimum P & T for max. liquid recovery.
Sometimes it isn’t practical to operate at the optimum point because
storage system vapor losses becomes too great under optimum conditions.
At the wellhead separation facilities, operators tend to determine the
optimum conditions for separators to maximize revenue.
High liquid recovery is desirable as liquid H.C. product is worth more than
the gas, provided that it can be handled in the available storage system.
Operator control operating P by use of backpressure valves.
Pipeline requirements for Btu content of the gas should also be
considered as a factor affecting separator operation.
Usually unfeasible to lower the separator operating T without adding
expensive mechanical refrigeration equipment.
However, indirect heater can be used to heat the gas prior to pressure
reduction of pipeline P in a choke. This is applied to high P wells.
By carefully operating this indirect heater, operator can prevent
overheating the gas stream ahead of the choke.
This adversely affects T of the downstream separator.
Separator Design
Natural gas engineers normally don’t perform detailed designing of
separators but carry out selection of suitable separators from
manufacturers' product catalogs based on well stream conditions.
Specifications are used for separator selections are:
1) Gas Capacity.
2) Liquid Capacity.
1. Gas Capacity:
Empirical equations proposed by Souders-Brown are widely used for
calculating gas capacity of oil/gas separators:
and
where
A: Total cross-sectional area of separator, ft2
ν: Superficial gas velocity based on total cross-sectional area A, ft/s
q: Gas flow rate at operating conditions, ft3/s
ρL: Density of liquid at operating conditions, lbm/ft
ρg: Density of gas at operating conditions, lbm/ft3
K: Empirical factor
Table 7-1 K-Values Used for Designing Separators
Also listed in the table are K-values used for other designs such as mist
eliminators & tray towers in dehydration or gas sweetening units.
Substituting Eq(7.1) into Eq(7.2) and applying real gas law gives:
Where:
qst: Gas capacity at standard conditions, MMscfd
D: Internal diameter of vessel, ft
P: Operation pressure, psia
T: Operating temperature, °F
Z: Gas compressibility factor
It should be noted that Equation (7.3) is empirical.
Height differences in vertical separators & length differences in
horizontal separators aren’t considered.
Field experience has indicated that additional gas capacity can be
obtained by increasing height of vertical separators & length of horizontal
separators.
Although 1/2 full of liquid is more or less standard for most single-tube
horizontal separators, lowering liquid level to increase the available gas
space within the vessel increases the gas capacity.
2. Liquid Capacity :
Liquid retention time within vessel determines separator liquid capacity.
Adequate separation requires sufficient time to obtain an equilibrium
condition between the liquid & gas phase at T & P of separation.
separator liquid capacity relates to the retention time through the
settling volume:
qL: Liquid capacity, bbl/day
Vt: Liquid settling volume, bbl
t:Retention time, min
Table 7-2 Retention Time Required under Various
Separation Conditions
It is shown that T has a strong effect on three-phase separations at low P.
Table 7-3 through Table 7-8 present liquid-settling volumes with the
placement of liquid-level controls for typical oil/gas separators.
Experience shows for high P separators treating high gas/oil ratio well
streams, gas capacity is the controlling factor for separator selection.
However, the reverse may be true for low P separators used on well
streams with low gas/oil ratios.
Stage Separation :
A process in which H.C. mixtures are separated into vapor & liquid phases
by multiple equilibrium flashes at consecutively lower pressures.
A two-stage separation requires 1 separator & storage tank, and a three-
stage separation requires 2 separators & storage tank. (Storage tank is
counted as the final stage of vapor/liquid separation).
Stage separation reduces P a little at a time, in steps or stages, resulting
in a more stable stock-tank liquid.
Usually a stable stock-tank liquid can be obtained by a stage separation
of not more than 4 stages.
In high-pressure gas-condensate separation systems, a stepwise
reduction of P on the liquid condensate can significantly increase the
recovery of stock-tank liquids.
Prediction of the performance of various separators in multistage
separation system carried out with compositional computer models using
initial well stream composition and the operating T & P of various stages.
It has been generally recognized that two stages of separation plus the
stock tank are practically optimum.
The increase in liquid recovery for two-stage separation over single-stage
separation usually varies from 2 to 12 %, although 20 to 25 % increases in
liquid recoveries have been reported.
Although 3 to 4 stages of separation theoretically increase the liquid
recovery over a two-stage separation, the incremental liquid recovery
rarely pays out the cost of the additional separators.
The first-stage separator operating P is generally determined by the flow
line P and operating characteristics of the well.
The P usually ranges from 600 to 1,200 psi.
In situations where the flow line P > 600 psi, it is practical to let the first-
stage separator ride the line or operate at the flow line P.
P at low stage separations can be determined based on equal P ratios
between the stages:
Rp: Pressure ratio
Nst: Number of stages - 1
P1: First-stage or high-pressure separator P, psia
Ps: Stock-tank P, psia
Pressures at intermediate stages can be then designed with the formula:
Pi = pressure at stage i, psia.
Flash Calculation :
Based on the composition of well stream fluid, quality of products from
each separation stage predicted by flash calculations, assuming phase
equilibriums are reached in the separators.
This requires knowledge of equilibrium ratio defined as:
ki: Liquid/vapor equilibrium ratio of compound i
yi: Mole fraction of compound i in the vapor phase
xi: Mole fraction of compound i in the liquid phase
Accurate determination of k-values requires computer simulators solving
the Equation of State (EoS) for hydrocarbon systems.
For P <1,000 psia, a set of equations presented by Standing (1979)
provides an easy and accurate means of determining ki values.
According to Standing, ki can be calculated by:
Pci: Critical pressure, psia
Tbi: Boiling point, °R
Tci: Critical temperature, °R
Low-Temperature Separation
Field experience & flash calculations prove that lowering the operating T
of a separator increases the liquid recovery.
Low T separation process separates water & H.C. liquids from the inlet
well stream and recovers liquids from gas more than normal T separators.
It’s efficient means of handling high P gas & condensate at the wellhead.
Low T separation unit consists of: high P separator, P reducing chokes &
various pieces of heat exchange equipment.
When P is reduced by a choke, fluid T decreases due to the Joule
Thomson or throttling effect (irreversible adiabatic process in which gas
heat content remains the same across the choke but P & T are reduced).
Generally at least ΔP of 2,500 to 3,000 psi required from wellhead
flowing P to pipeline P to pay out in increased liquid recovery.
The lower the separator operating T, the lighter the liquid recovery .
 The lowest operating T recommended is usually around -20 °F.
This is constrained by carbon steel embitterment, and high-alloy steels
for lower T are usually not economical for field installations.
Low T separation units are normally operated from 0 to 20 °F.
The actual T drop per unit P drop is affected by several factors including:
gas stream composition, gas and liquid flow rates, bath T & ambient T.
T reduction in the process can be estimated using the equations
presented in Chapter 5.
Gas expansion P for hydrate formation can be found from the chart
prepared by Katz (1945) (see Chapter 12).
Liquid & vapor phase densities can be predicted by flash calculation.
Following the special requirement for construction of low T separation
units, the P reducing choke is usually mounted directly on the inlet of the
high P separator.
Hydrates form in the downstream of the choke due to the low gas T and
fall to the bottom settling section of the separator.
They are heated and melted by liquid heating coils located in the bottom
of the separator.

More Related Content

PPSX
Three Phase Separators
PPTX
Oil Refinery
PDF
Gas Plant Separator Design
PDF
Gas Condensate Separation Stages – Design & Optimization
PPTX
Dr. Aborig Lecture- Chapter 3 natural gas processing
PDF
Chapter 2 crude_oil_processing2
PDF
Refinery process-description
Three Phase Separators
Oil Refinery
Gas Plant Separator Design
Gas Condensate Separation Stages – Design & Optimization
Dr. Aborig Lecture- Chapter 3 natural gas processing
Chapter 2 crude_oil_processing2
Refinery process-description

What's hot (20)

PPT
NATURAL GAS DEHYDRATION
PDF
Desing Separators.pdf
PDF
6. phase separatation
PDF
Design of Gas and Oil Separator 2023.pdf
PPTX
Crude oil assay
PPTX
Chemical EOR
PPTX
Hydrocarbon Phase Behaviour
PDF
Separator sizing and droplet sizes low shear school - 2017
PDF
Petroleum Refinery Engineering-Part-2-30-July-2016
PPTX
Classifications of Crude Oil
PPTX
Dehydration and Sweetening of Natural Gas
PPTX
PDF
phase-behavior
PDF
CENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSOR SETTLE OUT CONDITIONS TUTORIAL
PPTX
Distillation Column Design
PPTX
Crude oil Production System
PPTX
Asphaltenes & wax deposition in petroleum production system
PPT
Reservoir rock & fluid
PPTX
Visbreaking and Delayed coking
PDF
4 eor 4-gasmethods,
NATURAL GAS DEHYDRATION
Desing Separators.pdf
6. phase separatation
Design of Gas and Oil Separator 2023.pdf
Crude oil assay
Chemical EOR
Hydrocarbon Phase Behaviour
Separator sizing and droplet sizes low shear school - 2017
Petroleum Refinery Engineering-Part-2-30-July-2016
Classifications of Crude Oil
Dehydration and Sweetening of Natural Gas
phase-behavior
CENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSOR SETTLE OUT CONDITIONS TUTORIAL
Distillation Column Design
Crude oil Production System
Asphaltenes & wax deposition in petroleum production system
Reservoir rock & fluid
Visbreaking and Delayed coking
4 eor 4-gasmethods,
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPTX
Oil and gas separators
PDF
Tutorial 002-separator
DOCX
Separator
DOCX
Capital humano gise
PPTX
What Is an Oil Gas Separator?
PPTX
Oil and gas separators
PDF
Oil & Gas Production and Surface Facilities
PDF
Introduction to Oil and Gas Industry - Upstream Midstream Downstream
PPT
Crude
PDF
E1267
PPTX
التحليل الوظيفي بالمصري مش بالعربي
PPTX
Separation
PPTX
Professional Interview Presentation Final Edition
PDF
Troubleshooting in Distillation Columns
PPTX
PDF
Coatings standards-and
PPT
Separator-Overview-Customer-2004 (1)
PPTX
Natural gas processing
PDF
تمرينات على الإكسل - عبد العظيم أحمد محمود
PPTX
Natural gas dehydration processes
Oil and gas separators
Tutorial 002-separator
Separator
Capital humano gise
What Is an Oil Gas Separator?
Oil and gas separators
Oil & Gas Production and Surface Facilities
Introduction to Oil and Gas Industry - Upstream Midstream Downstream
Crude
E1267
التحليل الوظيفي بالمصري مش بالعربي
Separation
Professional Interview Presentation Final Edition
Troubleshooting in Distillation Columns
Coatings standards-and
Separator-Overview-Customer-2004 (1)
Natural gas processing
تمرينات على الإكسل - عبد العظيم أحمد محمود
Natural gas dehydration processes
Ad

Similar to Lecture 6 (20)

PDF
Optimization of Separator Train in Oil Industry
PPTX
Surface_Production_2022_for_petroleum.pptx
PPTX
New PPT Template for operations on field.pptx
PPT
Natural gas processing technology separation
PDF
Lecture 2 -Separators of oil and gas systems
PDF
5. Two phase separation_slides_0.pdf
PDF
3_oil_and_gas_separation_design_manual_by_c_richard_sivalls.pdf
PPTX
IEC final presentation ceremony xfb nahi gg
PDF
Q913 rfp w3 lec 12, Separators and Phase envelope calculations
PPTX
DOC-20210222-WA0020..pptx
DOCX
Final Report Minor_Final Draft
PDF
Petroleum_Upstream_Operations_CPF_TPF_and_EPF__1748813365.pdf
PDF
Final Report 4_22_15
PPTX
Subsea Separation presentation
PPTX
Separator.pptx
PPTX
natural gas process and analysis techniques.pptx
PDF
Hydrates petro teach-free webinar-5 august 2020
PPTX
Three-Phase-Oil-Gas-Horizontal-Separator.pptx
DOCX
Center Enamel Mastering Petrochemical Purity Multi-Phase Separator Pressure V...
DOCX
Center Enamel Mastering Petrochemical Purity – China’s Leading Manufacturer o...
Optimization of Separator Train in Oil Industry
Surface_Production_2022_for_petroleum.pptx
New PPT Template for operations on field.pptx
Natural gas processing technology separation
Lecture 2 -Separators of oil and gas systems
5. Two phase separation_slides_0.pdf
3_oil_and_gas_separation_design_manual_by_c_richard_sivalls.pdf
IEC final presentation ceremony xfb nahi gg
Q913 rfp w3 lec 12, Separators and Phase envelope calculations
DOC-20210222-WA0020..pptx
Final Report Minor_Final Draft
Petroleum_Upstream_Operations_CPF_TPF_and_EPF__1748813365.pdf
Final Report 4_22_15
Subsea Separation presentation
Separator.pptx
natural gas process and analysis techniques.pptx
Hydrates petro teach-free webinar-5 august 2020
Three-Phase-Oil-Gas-Horizontal-Separator.pptx
Center Enamel Mastering Petrochemical Purity Multi-Phase Separator Pressure V...
Center Enamel Mastering Petrochemical Purity – China’s Leading Manufacturer o...

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Ron Thomas - Top Influential Business Leaders Shaping the Modern Industry – 2025
PDF
ICv2 White Paper - Gen Con Trade Day 2025
PDF
Robin Fischer: A Visionary Leader Making a Difference in Healthcare, One Day ...
PDF
Solaris Resources Presentation - Corporate August 2025.pdf
PDF
Satish NS: Fostering Innovation and Sustainability: Haier India’s Customer-Ce...
PPTX
interschool scomp.pptxzdkjhdjvdjvdjdhjhieij
PPTX
chapter 2 entrepreneurship full lecture ppt
PPTX
Slide gioi thieu VietinBank Quy 2 - 2025
PPTX
Astra-Investor- business Presentation (1).pptx
PPTX
basic introduction to research chapter 1.pptx
PPTX
BUSINESS CYCLE_INFLATION AND UNEMPLOYMENT.pptx
PDF
533158074-Saudi-Arabia-Companies-List-Contact.pdf
DOCX
Center Enamel A Strategic Partner for the Modernization of Georgia's Chemical...
DOCX
FINALS-BSHhchcuvivicucucucucM-Centro.docx
DOCX
Hand book of Entrepreneurship 4 Chapters.docx
PPTX
operations management : demand supply ch
PPTX
2 - Self & Personality 587689213yiuedhwejbmansbeakjrk
PPT
Lecture 3344;;,,(,(((((((((((((((((((((((
PDF
Keppel_Proposed Divestment of M1 Limited
PDF
Chapter 2 - AI chatbots and prompt engineering.pdf
Ron Thomas - Top Influential Business Leaders Shaping the Modern Industry – 2025
ICv2 White Paper - Gen Con Trade Day 2025
Robin Fischer: A Visionary Leader Making a Difference in Healthcare, One Day ...
Solaris Resources Presentation - Corporate August 2025.pdf
Satish NS: Fostering Innovation and Sustainability: Haier India’s Customer-Ce...
interschool scomp.pptxzdkjhdjvdjvdjdhjhieij
chapter 2 entrepreneurship full lecture ppt
Slide gioi thieu VietinBank Quy 2 - 2025
Astra-Investor- business Presentation (1).pptx
basic introduction to research chapter 1.pptx
BUSINESS CYCLE_INFLATION AND UNEMPLOYMENT.pptx
533158074-Saudi-Arabia-Companies-List-Contact.pdf
Center Enamel A Strategic Partner for the Modernization of Georgia's Chemical...
FINALS-BSHhchcuvivicucucucucM-Centro.docx
Hand book of Entrepreneurship 4 Chapters.docx
operations management : demand supply ch
2 - Self & Personality 587689213yiuedhwejbmansbeakjrk
Lecture 3344;;,,(,(((((((((((((((((((((((
Keppel_Proposed Divestment of M1 Limited
Chapter 2 - AI chatbots and prompt engineering.pdf

Lecture 6

  • 1. Three Phase Separator Oil/gas/water three-phase separators are commonly used for well testing and in instances where free water separates from the oil or condensate. Can be accomplished in any type of separator by: I. Installing either special internal baffling to construct a water leg or a water siphon arrangement. II. Using an interface liquid-level control. Difficult to install in spherical separators because of their limited available internal space.In three-phase operations, 2 liquid dump valves are required.
  • 3. Factors Affecting Separation Factors that affect separation of liquid and gas phases include: separator operating P, separator operating T & fluid stream composition. For a given fluid well stream in a specified separator, changes in any of these factors will change the amount of gas & liquid leaving the separator. An increase in operating P or a decrease in operating T increases liquid covered in a separator. However, this is untrue for gas condensate systems. Optimum points for both beyond which further changes won’t affect liquid recovery.
  • 4. Computer simulation (flash vaporization calculation) of well stream phase behavior of allows finding optimum P & T for max. liquid recovery. Sometimes it isn’t practical to operate at the optimum point because storage system vapor losses becomes too great under optimum conditions. At the wellhead separation facilities, operators tend to determine the optimum conditions for separators to maximize revenue. High liquid recovery is desirable as liquid H.C. product is worth more than the gas, provided that it can be handled in the available storage system. Operator control operating P by use of backpressure valves.
  • 5. Pipeline requirements for Btu content of the gas should also be considered as a factor affecting separator operation. Usually unfeasible to lower the separator operating T without adding expensive mechanical refrigeration equipment. However, indirect heater can be used to heat the gas prior to pressure reduction of pipeline P in a choke. This is applied to high P wells. By carefully operating this indirect heater, operator can prevent overheating the gas stream ahead of the choke. This adversely affects T of the downstream separator.
  • 6. Separator Design Natural gas engineers normally don’t perform detailed designing of separators but carry out selection of suitable separators from manufacturers' product catalogs based on well stream conditions. Specifications are used for separator selections are: 1) Gas Capacity. 2) Liquid Capacity.
  • 7. 1. Gas Capacity: Empirical equations proposed by Souders-Brown are widely used for calculating gas capacity of oil/gas separators: and where A: Total cross-sectional area of separator, ft2 ν: Superficial gas velocity based on total cross-sectional area A, ft/s q: Gas flow rate at operating conditions, ft3/s ρL: Density of liquid at operating conditions, lbm/ft ρg: Density of gas at operating conditions, lbm/ft3 K: Empirical factor
  • 8. Table 7-1 K-Values Used for Designing Separators Also listed in the table are K-values used for other designs such as mist eliminators & tray towers in dehydration or gas sweetening units.
  • 9. Substituting Eq(7.1) into Eq(7.2) and applying real gas law gives: Where: qst: Gas capacity at standard conditions, MMscfd D: Internal diameter of vessel, ft P: Operation pressure, psia T: Operating temperature, °F Z: Gas compressibility factor
  • 10. It should be noted that Equation (7.3) is empirical. Height differences in vertical separators & length differences in horizontal separators aren’t considered. Field experience has indicated that additional gas capacity can be obtained by increasing height of vertical separators & length of horizontal separators. Although 1/2 full of liquid is more or less standard for most single-tube horizontal separators, lowering liquid level to increase the available gas space within the vessel increases the gas capacity.
  • 11. 2. Liquid Capacity : Liquid retention time within vessel determines separator liquid capacity. Adequate separation requires sufficient time to obtain an equilibrium condition between the liquid & gas phase at T & P of separation. separator liquid capacity relates to the retention time through the settling volume: qL: Liquid capacity, bbl/day Vt: Liquid settling volume, bbl t:Retention time, min
  • 12. Table 7-2 Retention Time Required under Various Separation Conditions It is shown that T has a strong effect on three-phase separations at low P.
  • 13. Table 7-3 through Table 7-8 present liquid-settling volumes with the placement of liquid-level controls for typical oil/gas separators. Experience shows for high P separators treating high gas/oil ratio well streams, gas capacity is the controlling factor for separator selection. However, the reverse may be true for low P separators used on well streams with low gas/oil ratios.
  • 14. Stage Separation : A process in which H.C. mixtures are separated into vapor & liquid phases by multiple equilibrium flashes at consecutively lower pressures. A two-stage separation requires 1 separator & storage tank, and a three- stage separation requires 2 separators & storage tank. (Storage tank is counted as the final stage of vapor/liquid separation). Stage separation reduces P a little at a time, in steps or stages, resulting in a more stable stock-tank liquid. Usually a stable stock-tank liquid can be obtained by a stage separation of not more than 4 stages.
  • 15. In high-pressure gas-condensate separation systems, a stepwise reduction of P on the liquid condensate can significantly increase the recovery of stock-tank liquids. Prediction of the performance of various separators in multistage separation system carried out with compositional computer models using initial well stream composition and the operating T & P of various stages.
  • 16. It has been generally recognized that two stages of separation plus the stock tank are practically optimum. The increase in liquid recovery for two-stage separation over single-stage separation usually varies from 2 to 12 %, although 20 to 25 % increases in liquid recoveries have been reported. Although 3 to 4 stages of separation theoretically increase the liquid recovery over a two-stage separation, the incremental liquid recovery rarely pays out the cost of the additional separators.
  • 17. The first-stage separator operating P is generally determined by the flow line P and operating characteristics of the well. The P usually ranges from 600 to 1,200 psi. In situations where the flow line P > 600 psi, it is practical to let the first- stage separator ride the line or operate at the flow line P.
  • 18. P at low stage separations can be determined based on equal P ratios between the stages: Rp: Pressure ratio Nst: Number of stages - 1 P1: First-stage or high-pressure separator P, psia Ps: Stock-tank P, psia Pressures at intermediate stages can be then designed with the formula: Pi = pressure at stage i, psia.
  • 19. Flash Calculation : Based on the composition of well stream fluid, quality of products from each separation stage predicted by flash calculations, assuming phase equilibriums are reached in the separators. This requires knowledge of equilibrium ratio defined as: ki: Liquid/vapor equilibrium ratio of compound i yi: Mole fraction of compound i in the vapor phase xi: Mole fraction of compound i in the liquid phase
  • 20. Accurate determination of k-values requires computer simulators solving the Equation of State (EoS) for hydrocarbon systems. For P <1,000 psia, a set of equations presented by Standing (1979) provides an easy and accurate means of determining ki values. According to Standing, ki can be calculated by:
  • 21. Pci: Critical pressure, psia Tbi: Boiling point, °R Tci: Critical temperature, °R
  • 22. Low-Temperature Separation Field experience & flash calculations prove that lowering the operating T of a separator increases the liquid recovery. Low T separation process separates water & H.C. liquids from the inlet well stream and recovers liquids from gas more than normal T separators. It’s efficient means of handling high P gas & condensate at the wellhead. Low T separation unit consists of: high P separator, P reducing chokes & various pieces of heat exchange equipment. When P is reduced by a choke, fluid T decreases due to the Joule Thomson or throttling effect (irreversible adiabatic process in which gas heat content remains the same across the choke but P & T are reduced).
  • 23. Generally at least ΔP of 2,500 to 3,000 psi required from wellhead flowing P to pipeline P to pay out in increased liquid recovery. The lower the separator operating T, the lighter the liquid recovery .  The lowest operating T recommended is usually around -20 °F. This is constrained by carbon steel embitterment, and high-alloy steels for lower T are usually not economical for field installations. Low T separation units are normally operated from 0 to 20 °F.
  • 24. The actual T drop per unit P drop is affected by several factors including: gas stream composition, gas and liquid flow rates, bath T & ambient T. T reduction in the process can be estimated using the equations presented in Chapter 5. Gas expansion P for hydrate formation can be found from the chart prepared by Katz (1945) (see Chapter 12). Liquid & vapor phase densities can be predicted by flash calculation.
  • 25. Following the special requirement for construction of low T separation units, the P reducing choke is usually mounted directly on the inlet of the high P separator. Hydrates form in the downstream of the choke due to the low gas T and fall to the bottom settling section of the separator. They are heated and melted by liquid heating coils located in the bottom of the separator.