EC-103
Semester 2
Lectures 6 & 7
Market structure and
Imperfect Competition
Most markets fall between the two extremes of
monopoly and perfect competition
• An imperfectly competitive firm
– would like to sell more at the going price
– faces a downward-sloping demand curve
– recognizes its output price depends on the quantity
of goods produced and sold
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002
Imperfect competition
• An oligopoly
– an industry with a few producers
– each recognizing that its own price depends both on its
own actions and those of its rivals.
• In an industry with monopolistic competition
– there are many sellers producing products that are close
substitutes for one another
– each firm has only limited ability to influence its output
price.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002
4
Market structure
Number
of firms
Ability to
affect
price
Entry
barriers
Example
Perfect competition
Imperfect competition:
Monopolistic competition
Oligopoly
Monopoly
Many
Many
Few
One
Nil
Small
Medium
Large
None
None
Some
Huge
Fruit stall
Corner shop
Cars
Post Office
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002
Monopolistic competition
• Characteristics:
– many firms
– no barriers to entry
– product differentiation
• so the firm faces a downward-sloping demand curve
– The absence of entry barriers means that profits are
competed away...
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002
Monopolistic competition (2)
• Firms end up in TANGENCY
EQUILIBRIUM, making
normal profits
• Firms do not operate at
minimum LAC
• Price exceeds marginal cost
• Unlike perfect competition, the
firm here is eager to sell more
at the going market price.
P1=AC1
£
OutputQ1
D
MR
AC
MC
F
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002
Oligopoly
• A market with a few sellers
• The essence of an oligopolistic industry is the
need for each firm to consider how its own
actions affect the decisions of its relatively few
competitors
• Oligopoly may be characterized by collusion
or by non-co-operation
Collusion and cartels
• COLLUSION
– an explicit or implicit agreement between
existing firms to avoid or limit competition
with one another
• CARTEL
– is a situation in which formal agreements
between firms are legally permitted
e.g. OPEC
Collusion is difficult if:
• There are many firms in the industry
• The product is not standardized
• Demand and cost conditions are changing
rapidly
• There are no barriers to entry
• Firms have surplus capacity
The kinked demand curve
Q0
P0
Quantity
£
Consider how a firm may
perceive its demand curve
under oligopoly.
It can observe the current
price and output,
but must try to anticipate
rival reactions to any
price change.
Q0
P0
Quantity
£
The kinked demand curve (2)
The firm may expect rivals
to respond if it reduces
its price, as this will be seen
as an aggressive move
… so demand in response
to a price reduction is likely
to be relatively inelastic
The demand curve will
be steep below P0.
D
The kinked demand curve (3)
…but for a price increase
rivals are less likely to
react,
so demand may be
relatively elastic
above P0
so the firm perceives
that it faces a kinked
demand curve.D
Q0
P0
Quantity
£
The kinked demand curve (4)
Given this perception, the
firm sees that revenue will
fall whether price is increased
or decreased,
so the best strategy is to keep
price at P0.
Price will tend to be stable,
even in the face of an increase
in marginal cost.D
Q0
P0
Quantity
£
Game theory: some key terms
• Game
– a situation in which intelligent decisions are
necessarily interdependent
• Strategy
– a game plan describing how the player will act or
move in every conceivable situation
• Dominant strategy
– where a player’s best strategy is independent of
those chosen by others
Harcourt, Inc. items and derived items copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc.
Game Theory and the
Economics of Cooperation
Game theory is the study of how people
behave in strategic situations.
Strategic decisions are those in which
each person, in deciding what actions to
take, must consider how others might
respond to that action.
Game Theory and the Economics
of Cooperation
Because the number of firms in an
oligopolistic market is small, each firm
must act strategically.
Each firm knows that its profit depends not
only on how much it produced but also on
how much the other firms produce.
The Prisoners’ Dilemma
The prisoners’ dilemma provides
insight into the difficulty in
maintaining cooperation.
Often people (firms) fail to cooperate
with one another even when cooperation
would make them better off.
The Prisoners’ Dilemma
Bonnie’s Decision
Confess Remain Silent
Confess
Remain
Silent
Clyde’s
Decision
Clyde gets
8 years
Bonnie gets
8 years
Bonnie gets
20 years
Bonnie gets
1 year
Bonnie
goes free
Clyde gets
20 years
Clyde gets
1 year
Clyde goes
free
The Prisoners’ Dilemma
The dominant strategy is the best
strategy for a player to follow
regardless of the strategies pursued by
other players.
The Prisoners’ Dilemma
Cooperation is difficult to
maintain, because cooperation is
not in the best interest of the
individual player.
Oligopolies as a
Prisoners’ Dilemma
Iraq’s Decision
High
Production
Low Production
High
Production
Low
Production
Iran’s
Decision
Iran gets
$40 billion
Iraq gets
$40 billion
Iraq gets
$30 billion
Iraq gets
$50 billion
Iraq gets
$60 billion
Iran gets
$30 billion
Iran gets
$50 billion
Iran gets
$60 billion
Oligopolies as a
Prisoners’ Dilemma
Self-interest makes it difficult for the
oligopoly to maintain a cooperative
outcome with low production, high prices,
and monopoly profits.
Why People Sometimes
Cooperate
Firms that care about future profits will
cooperate in repeated games rather than
cheating in a single game to achieve a
one-time gain.
The Prisoners’ Dilemma Game
Consider two firms in a duopoly each with a choice
of producing “high” or “low” output:
Firm B output
High Low
High 1 1 3 0
FirmAoutput
Low 0 3 2 2
The Prisoners’ Dilemma
• Each firm has a dominant strategy to
produce high
• so they make 1 unit profit each
• but they would both be better off producing
low
– as long as they can be sure that the other firm
also produces low.
• So collusion can bring mutual benefits
• but there is incentive for each firm to cheat
More on collusion
• The probability of cheating may be affected
by agreement or threats
• Pre-commitment
– an arrangement, entered voluntarily, restricting
future options
• Credible threat
– a threat which, after the fact, is optimal to carry
out
Strategic entry deterrence
• Some entry barriers are deliberately erected
by incumbent firms:
– threat of predatory pricing
– spare capacity
– advertising and R&D
– product proliferation
• Actions that enforce sunk costs on potential
entrants

More Related Content

PPT
12 2 oligopoly
PPT
Oligopoly
PPT
Oligopoly
PPT
Ethics in Oligopoly & public policy
PPTX
Oligopoly
PPT
Oligopoly
PPTX
Be chap6 oligopoly models and game theory jan2019
PPTX
Be chap8 the economics of information & market failure
12 2 oligopoly
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Ethics in Oligopoly & public policy
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Be chap6 oligopoly models and game theory jan2019
Be chap8 the economics of information & market failure

What's hot (18)

PPT
Tacit Collusion
PPT
PPT
PPT
Differences between duopoly and monopoly
PDF
2016 academia roadshow the act
PDF
The social costs of monopoly and regulation
ODP
Csr presentation
PPTX
Kinked demand curve model
PDF
Managerial economics » oligopolistic market
PPT
Playmobil.Ver2
PPTX
Collusion in oligopoly
PPT
Oligopoly lesson 6a
PPTX
Chapter 8 presentation
PPTX
Chapter 42: Antitrust Law
PPT
Contribution of mergers and takeovers in indian economy 2
PPTX
Oligopoly Market in Economics PPT
PPTX
Mergers and Acquisitions in Retail Managment
PPT
Econ 204 week 11 outline
Tacit Collusion
Differences between duopoly and monopoly
2016 academia roadshow the act
The social costs of monopoly and regulation
Csr presentation
Kinked demand curve model
Managerial economics » oligopolistic market
Playmobil.Ver2
Collusion in oligopoly
Oligopoly lesson 6a
Chapter 8 presentation
Chapter 42: Antitrust Law
Contribution of mergers and takeovers in indian economy 2
Oligopoly Market in Economics PPT
Mergers and Acquisitions in Retail Managment
Econ 204 week 11 outline
Ad

Viewers also liked (17)

PPTX
1 the case for regional policy(4)-1
PPTX
Ec 112 (12) lecture 4 26.10.12 (ntp)
PPTX
Ec 111 week 1b(1)
PPTX
Ec 111 week 3(2)
PPTX
Lectures 1 & 2 30.01.13(1)
PPTX
Ec 111 week 4(1)
PPTX
Ec 111 week 5(2)
PPT
Lect 2 rev - determinants and consequences of inequality copy
PPT
Lect1 inequality-measurement
PPTX
Ec 111 week 1(1)
PPTX
5 regional funding(1)
PPTX
1 the case for regional policy(4)-1
PPTX
2 uk regional policy-1
PPTX
4 devolution(4)
PPTX
Economics of education 04.11.11(3)
PPTX
Economics of education 14.11.11(1)
PPTX
Ec 111 week 5 b
1 the case for regional policy(4)-1
Ec 112 (12) lecture 4 26.10.12 (ntp)
Ec 111 week 1b(1)
Ec 111 week 3(2)
Lectures 1 & 2 30.01.13(1)
Ec 111 week 4(1)
Ec 111 week 5(2)
Lect 2 rev - determinants and consequences of inequality copy
Lect1 inequality-measurement
Ec 111 week 1(1)
5 regional funding(1)
1 the case for regional policy(4)-1
2 uk regional policy-1
4 devolution(4)
Economics of education 04.11.11(3)
Economics of education 14.11.11(1)
Ec 111 week 5 b
Ad

Similar to Lectures 6 & 7 05.03.13 (20)

PPT
12 2 oligopoly
PPT
12 2 oligopoly
PPT
Chapter 16.ppt
PPTX
Chapter 7 Oligopoly
PPTX
Be chap6 oligopoly models
PPTX
Imperfect competion 2
PPTX
Imperfect competion 2
PPT
PPT
Econ789 chapter013
PPT
PPTX
MONOPOLY AND OLIGOPOLY LECTURES AND POWERPOINT
PPTX
Imperfect competion 2
PPTX
Managerial economics markets unit 3 for jntuk
PPTX
Oligopoly Competition Pricing, and Different Models
PPT
Oligopoly & Duopoly
PPTX
Sampe WW power point
PPTX
Oligopoly.manasa
PPT
Class mkt structures ii
DOCX
Zax zeeliin Shinj
PPTX
Imprefect
12 2 oligopoly
12 2 oligopoly
Chapter 16.ppt
Chapter 7 Oligopoly
Be chap6 oligopoly models
Imperfect competion 2
Imperfect competion 2
Econ789 chapter013
MONOPOLY AND OLIGOPOLY LECTURES AND POWERPOINT
Imperfect competion 2
Managerial economics markets unit 3 for jntuk
Oligopoly Competition Pricing, and Different Models
Oligopoly & Duopoly
Sampe WW power point
Oligopoly.manasa
Class mkt structures ii
Zax zeeliin Shinj
Imprefect

More from Dan Curtis (9)

PPT
Lect 4 responding to inequality
PPT
Lect 3 rev - determinants and consequences of inequality copy-1
PPTX
Ec 111 week 4b(1)
PPTX
Ec 111 week 3b(1)
PPTX
Ec 111 week 2bb-1
PPTX
Ec 111 week 2b bb
PPTX
3 eu regional policy
PPT
Lecture 4 & 5 18.02.13
PPT
Lecture 5 27.02.13
Lect 4 responding to inequality
Lect 3 rev - determinants and consequences of inequality copy-1
Ec 111 week 4b(1)
Ec 111 week 3b(1)
Ec 111 week 2bb-1
Ec 111 week 2b bb
3 eu regional policy
Lecture 4 & 5 18.02.13
Lecture 5 27.02.13

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
PDF
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
PDF
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
PPTX
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
PPTX
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
PDF
احياء السادس العلمي - الفصل الثالث (التكاثر) منهج متميزين/كلية بغداد/موهوبين
PPTX
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
PDF
Vision Prelims GS PYQ Analysis 2011-2022 www.upscpdf.com.pdf
PDF
MBA _Common_ 2nd year Syllabus _2021-22_.pdf
DOCX
Cambridge-Practice-Tests-for-IELTS-12.docx
PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
PDF
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
PDF
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
PDF
Uderstanding digital marketing and marketing stratergie for engaging the digi...
PDF
advance database management system book.pdf
PDF
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
PPTX
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access-Surgery.pdf
PPTX
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
PDF
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
احياء السادس العلمي - الفصل الثالث (التكاثر) منهج متميزين/كلية بغداد/موهوبين
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
Vision Prelims GS PYQ Analysis 2011-2022 www.upscpdf.com.pdf
MBA _Common_ 2nd year Syllabus _2021-22_.pdf
Cambridge-Practice-Tests-for-IELTS-12.docx
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
Uderstanding digital marketing and marketing stratergie for engaging the digi...
advance database management system book.pdf
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
Complications of Minimal Access-Surgery.pdf
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide

Lectures 6 & 7 05.03.13

  • 1. EC-103 Semester 2 Lectures 6 & 7 Market structure and Imperfect Competition
  • 2. Most markets fall between the two extremes of monopoly and perfect competition • An imperfectly competitive firm – would like to sell more at the going price – faces a downward-sloping demand curve – recognizes its output price depends on the quantity of goods produced and sold © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002
  • 3. Imperfect competition • An oligopoly – an industry with a few producers – each recognizing that its own price depends both on its own actions and those of its rivals. • In an industry with monopolistic competition – there are many sellers producing products that are close substitutes for one another – each firm has only limited ability to influence its output price. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002
  • 4. 4 Market structure Number of firms Ability to affect price Entry barriers Example Perfect competition Imperfect competition: Monopolistic competition Oligopoly Monopoly Many Many Few One Nil Small Medium Large None None Some Huge Fruit stall Corner shop Cars Post Office © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002
  • 5. Monopolistic competition • Characteristics: – many firms – no barriers to entry – product differentiation • so the firm faces a downward-sloping demand curve – The absence of entry barriers means that profits are competed away... © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002
  • 6. Monopolistic competition (2) • Firms end up in TANGENCY EQUILIBRIUM, making normal profits • Firms do not operate at minimum LAC • Price exceeds marginal cost • Unlike perfect competition, the firm here is eager to sell more at the going market price. P1=AC1 £ OutputQ1 D MR AC MC F © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002
  • 7. Oligopoly • A market with a few sellers • The essence of an oligopolistic industry is the need for each firm to consider how its own actions affect the decisions of its relatively few competitors • Oligopoly may be characterized by collusion or by non-co-operation
  • 8. Collusion and cartels • COLLUSION – an explicit or implicit agreement between existing firms to avoid or limit competition with one another • CARTEL – is a situation in which formal agreements between firms are legally permitted e.g. OPEC
  • 9. Collusion is difficult if: • There are many firms in the industry • The product is not standardized • Demand and cost conditions are changing rapidly • There are no barriers to entry • Firms have surplus capacity
  • 10. The kinked demand curve Q0 P0 Quantity £ Consider how a firm may perceive its demand curve under oligopoly. It can observe the current price and output, but must try to anticipate rival reactions to any price change.
  • 11. Q0 P0 Quantity £ The kinked demand curve (2) The firm may expect rivals to respond if it reduces its price, as this will be seen as an aggressive move … so demand in response to a price reduction is likely to be relatively inelastic The demand curve will be steep below P0. D
  • 12. The kinked demand curve (3) …but for a price increase rivals are less likely to react, so demand may be relatively elastic above P0 so the firm perceives that it faces a kinked demand curve.D Q0 P0 Quantity £
  • 13. The kinked demand curve (4) Given this perception, the firm sees that revenue will fall whether price is increased or decreased, so the best strategy is to keep price at P0. Price will tend to be stable, even in the face of an increase in marginal cost.D Q0 P0 Quantity £
  • 14. Game theory: some key terms • Game – a situation in which intelligent decisions are necessarily interdependent • Strategy – a game plan describing how the player will act or move in every conceivable situation • Dominant strategy – where a player’s best strategy is independent of those chosen by others
  • 15. Harcourt, Inc. items and derived items copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. Game Theory and the Economics of Cooperation Game theory is the study of how people behave in strategic situations. Strategic decisions are those in which each person, in deciding what actions to take, must consider how others might respond to that action.
  • 16. Game Theory and the Economics of Cooperation Because the number of firms in an oligopolistic market is small, each firm must act strategically. Each firm knows that its profit depends not only on how much it produced but also on how much the other firms produce.
  • 17. The Prisoners’ Dilemma The prisoners’ dilemma provides insight into the difficulty in maintaining cooperation. Often people (firms) fail to cooperate with one another even when cooperation would make them better off.
  • 18. The Prisoners’ Dilemma Bonnie’s Decision Confess Remain Silent Confess Remain Silent Clyde’s Decision Clyde gets 8 years Bonnie gets 8 years Bonnie gets 20 years Bonnie gets 1 year Bonnie goes free Clyde gets 20 years Clyde gets 1 year Clyde goes free
  • 19. The Prisoners’ Dilemma The dominant strategy is the best strategy for a player to follow regardless of the strategies pursued by other players.
  • 20. The Prisoners’ Dilemma Cooperation is difficult to maintain, because cooperation is not in the best interest of the individual player.
  • 21. Oligopolies as a Prisoners’ Dilemma Iraq’s Decision High Production Low Production High Production Low Production Iran’s Decision Iran gets $40 billion Iraq gets $40 billion Iraq gets $30 billion Iraq gets $50 billion Iraq gets $60 billion Iran gets $30 billion Iran gets $50 billion Iran gets $60 billion
  • 22. Oligopolies as a Prisoners’ Dilemma Self-interest makes it difficult for the oligopoly to maintain a cooperative outcome with low production, high prices, and monopoly profits.
  • 23. Why People Sometimes Cooperate Firms that care about future profits will cooperate in repeated games rather than cheating in a single game to achieve a one-time gain.
  • 24. The Prisoners’ Dilemma Game Consider two firms in a duopoly each with a choice of producing “high” or “low” output: Firm B output High Low High 1 1 3 0 FirmAoutput Low 0 3 2 2
  • 25. The Prisoners’ Dilemma • Each firm has a dominant strategy to produce high • so they make 1 unit profit each • but they would both be better off producing low – as long as they can be sure that the other firm also produces low. • So collusion can bring mutual benefits • but there is incentive for each firm to cheat
  • 26. More on collusion • The probability of cheating may be affected by agreement or threats • Pre-commitment – an arrangement, entered voluntarily, restricting future options • Credible threat – a threat which, after the fact, is optimal to carry out
  • 27. Strategic entry deterrence • Some entry barriers are deliberately erected by incumbent firms: – threat of predatory pricing – spare capacity – advertising and R&D – product proliferation • Actions that enforce sunk costs on potential entrants

Editor's Notes

  • #3: See the introduction to Chapter 9 in the main text.
  • #4: See the introduction to Chapter 9 in the main text.
  • #5: See the introduction to Chapter 9 in the main text, and Table 9-1.
  • #6: See Section 9-2.
  • #7: See Section 9-2, and Figure 9-2.
  • #8: See Section 9-3.
  • #9: See Section 9-3.
  • #10: See Section 9-3.
  • #11: See Section 9-3, and Figure 9-4.
  • #12: See Section 9-3, and Figure 9-4.
  • #13: See Section 9-3 in the main text, and Figure 9-4.
  • #14: See Section 9-3 in the main text, and Figure 9-4.
  • #15: See Section 9-4 in the main text.
  • #17: 16
  • #18: 17
  • #19: 17
  • #20: 19
  • #21: 19
  • #22: 17
  • #23: 20
  • #24: 21
  • #25: See Section 9-4 in the main text, and Figure 9-5.
  • #26: See Section 9-4 in the main text.
  • #27: See Section 9-4 in the main text.
  • #28: See Section 9-7 in the main text.