SlideShare a Scribd company logo
2
Most read
© 2016 IBM Corporation © 2016 IBM Corporation
The disadvantages of a scale-out x86 server model are beginning to outweigh the advantages …
IBM LinuxONE systems are supported
by standard distributions of Red Hat,
SUSE and Canonical (Ubuntu)
• Up to 141 cores
• Up to 10 TB memory
• Up to 160 PCIe slots
• Up to 20 cores
• Up to 4 TB memory
• Up to 32 PCIe slots
• Massive scale: Single node MongoDB with a footprint of +1TB, processing +2B
documents, maintains fetch times under 5ms and avoids overhead, cost and complexity
of sharding 1
• Docker density: a single Emperor can create and start more than 1 million Docker
containers 1
• Consolidation of x86 servers: Linux on Emperor can support up to 8000 VMs in a
single footprint for large scale consolidations 2
Is low server utilization wrecking havoc in your data center?
Does your business demand faster response time and more agility?
Have your software costs or administration costs reached the point of unsustainable?
Can your business afford
to settle for only
“good enough”
1 Based on results from internal lab measurements. The actual performance that any user will experience will vary
depending upon considerations such as the amount of multiprogramming in the user's job stream, the I/O configuration,
the storage configuration, and the workload processed. Therefore, results may vary depending on the workload and
other factors.
2 Based on IBM internal measurements and projections.
™™
14
With a huge capacity range,
grow with virtually limitless
scale to handle the most
demanding workloads
An entry point model
offering similar value
but with the flexibility of
a smaller package
For certain workloads and environments:
Consolidation on large virtualized servers
raises utilization, reduces core requirements,
and lowers cost per workload
45% lower in cost
• Spare cores for failover
• RAIM memory
• Built-in top to bottom security
Not available
on x86 servers
IBM, the IBM logo, GDPS, HiperSockets, LinuxONE, LinuxONE Emperor, and LinuxONE Rockhopper, are trademarks of the
International Business Machines Corporation in the United States and/or other countries.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States, other countries, or both.
ibm.com/LinuxONE
1 Robert Frances Group, 10 Reasons LinuxONE is the Best Choice for Linux Workloads, 2015; The information and materials
presented herein represent to the best of our knowledge true and accurate information as of date of publication. It
nevertheless is being provided on an "as is" basis. IBM Corp. sponsored this research report.
2 This holds true for entities in developing countries that have as few as 30 Linux workloads or 20 Linux servers, as well as
large enterprises with an IT infrastructure that spans across multiple data centers.
3 Performance comparison based on IBM Internal tests comparing IBM LinuxONE Rockhopper cloud with one comparably
configured private x86 cloud and one comparably configured public cloud running general purpose virtual machines designed
to replicate typical IBM customer workload usage in the marketplace. System configurations are based on equivalence ratios
derived from IBM internal studies and are as follows: Public Cloud configuration: total of 24 general purpose instances; x86
Cloud configuration: total of two x86 systems each with 24 Intel E5-2690 v3 cores, 192GB memory, and 2x400GB SSDs;
LinuxONE Rockhopper Cloud configuration: total of 8 cores, 384GB memory, and Storwize v7000 with 4x400GB SSDs. Price
comparison estimates based on a 3YR Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) using publicly available U.S. street prices (current as of
December 10, 2015). Public Cloud TCO estimate includes costs (US East Region) of infrastructure (instances, data out,
storage, support, free tier/reserved tier discounts), middleware and labor. LinuxONE Rockhopper and x86 TCO estimates
include costs of infrastructure (system, memory, storage, virtualization, OS, cloud management), middleware and labor.
Results may vary based on actual workloads, system configurations, customer applications, queries and other variables in a
production environment and may produce different results. Users of this document should verify the applicable data for their
specific environment.
4 IDC White Paper, sponsored by IBM, Driving Digital Transformation through Infrastructure Built for Open Source: How IBM
LinuxONE Addresses Agile Infrastructure Needs of Next Generation Applications, September 2015
All kind of Linux workloads
• Up to 0% unplanned downtime due
to hardware failures
• Near-continuous availability with
GDPS® Virtual Appliance
• and more…
The TCO for Linux applications on
x86 servers can be more than
65% more expensive
than on LinuxONE servers. (Robert
Frances Group2,1)
LinuxONE systems
provide the highest levels
of availability (near 100%
uptime with no single point
of failure), performance,
throughput, and security.
(Robert Frances Group1)
IDC return on investment studies
typically find that larger systems tend to
deliver lower management costs
than those associated with distributed
servers. (IDC4)
LUL12348-USEN-04
© 2016 IBM Corporation © 2016 IBM Corporation
... or clone more
Linux guests with
a high degree of
resource sharing
Dynamically add
cores, memory, I/O
adapters, devices
and network cards
Grow horizontally and vertically without disruption to
running environment
Provision for peak utilization, unused resources
automatically reallocated after peak
32
Choice of hypervisors:
Hardware logical partitions (LPAR) designed
for complete workload isolation1
z/VM® – supports recursion and live guest
relocation
KVM for LinuxONE – popular, familiar open
source solution
HiperSockets™ – very fast, in-memory TCP/IP
connectivity
IBM LinuxONE Emperor chip
Micro-technology 22 nm SOI • Single Instruction Multiple Data (SIMD)
• Out-of-order processing
• Dense packaging: electrons can travel
about 11.8 inches in a nanosecond
• On-chip coprocessors
Core count,
speed, housing
8 core per chip, 5.0 GHz
6 chips per drawer
(multiple drawer models)
# Threads 2 per core
Support of hardware transactional
memory (HTM), I/O offload from main
cores, I/O prioritization, simplified DR
IBM LinuxONE Emperor has over 4x
more on-chip cache per core than
x86 servers … plus L4 cache not
found on x86 servers!2
IBM LinuxONE has separate cores
to process I/O (up to 24) and drive
a dedicated I/O subsystem …
unlike x86 servers!2
Only IBM LinuxONE supports Capacity
on Demand – more cores when you
need them.
IBM LinuxONE Emperor demonstrates advantage in multiple tests1
Docker
A LinuxONE Emperor runs 2000+ Docker containers on average 2.0x better than
a compared x86-based system 2
IBM
WebSphere®
Application
Server Liberty
1.5x better throughput versus a compared x86 platform running DayTrader 3,
exploiting SMT and SIMD technology 3
MariaDB
MariaDB has a scaling efficiency of 84% up to 32 hardware threads (16 cores).
Open Source products show an excellent scaling efficiency
MongoDB
Up to 2.4x higher throughput versus a compared x86 system running the Yahoo
Cloud Service Benchmark (YCSB) 4
Spark
Up to 50% higher performance using Spark 1.4.0 versus a compared x86
platform 5
1 IBM LinuxONE is a commercial platform with EAL5 security classification. This certification means that although
different workloads are running on the same hardware, they are protected when running in separate partitions;
one logical partition (LPAR) cannot reach across boundaries into the next LPAR and compromise its security.
2 Evaluated LinuxONE servers are Emperor and Rockhopper, L4 cache and separate cores to process I/O are
not mentioned in any x86 server specification.
Scale out
Scaleup
1 These claims are based on results from internal IBM lab measurements on standalone dedicated systems in a controlled
environment. Results may vary depending on the workload and other factors.
2 Apache Solr search queries driven by Apache Jmeter System Stack, Emperor native LPAR on 36 cores with 755GB
memory. x86-based alternative system (Lenovo System x3650 M5 w/ E5-2699 v3 processors): Native Linux on 36 CPU
cores with 755GB memory, Heavy Docker Container: Apache Solr v4.10.0, WebSphere Liberty v8.5.5.2, IBM Java 1.8.0
SR1, Lightweight Docker Container: BusyBox, System SW: Docker 1.10.0-dev w/ aufs storage backend, RHEL 7.1. Note:
Each active container is driven by a client thread in Apache Jmeter, which keeps sending the same Solr query repeatedly
to the container to search documents that contain given key words in a pre-loaded & pre-indexed 46GB Wikipedia
snapshot. The docker runtime was modified to increase a thread count limit, to avoid connection time-out, and to separate
a dockerinit binary from a docker binary. A modified Linux 4.3.0 kernel to support more than 1024 network bridge ports
was installed on RHEL 7.1.
3 Native LPAR on Emperor with 4 cores running SLES 12 with WAS 8.5.5.5 and IBM 64-bit SDK for Linux Java™
Technology Edition, Version 8.0.1, using HiperSockets to client and DB2 server. Lenovo x3550 M4 with 2 cores of Intel
Xeon CPU E5-2640 v3 @ 2.60GHz running RHEL 7.1, with IBM 64-bit SDK for Linux Java Technology Edition, Version
8.0.1, using 10gb Ethernet to client and db2 server.
4 YCSB 0.2.0 (write-heavy, read-mostly, read-only), MongoDB 3.0.4 (WiredTiger, no sharding). Native LPAR on Emperor
with SMT, RHEL 7.1. Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 HT native Linux, RHEL 7.1. 1-8 cores dedicated to MongoDB, 20
or 28 cores dedicated to YCSB.
5 The actual performance will vary depending on Spark-Perf benchmark version, Spark versions, IBM JDK versions and
other factors. Spark 1.4.0 used on both platforms had Spark local, log and working directories on Ram Disk; 540672Mb
was the total executor memory on both platforms. Native LPAR on Emperor with 6 cores and each core in SMT2; IBM 64-
bit SDK for Java Technology Edition, Version 8 with SR1-FP10. Intel Xeon CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz, running Ubuntu
15.04 with no other workloads running; 36 physical Cores using Hyper-Threading but only 6 physical cores were used for
Spark; IBM 64-bit SDK for Java Technology Edition, Version 8 SR1.
LPAR
Linux
servers
Linux
Linux
servers
KVM or
z/VM
LPAR LPAR
Hardware resources
HiperSockets LAN
KVM or
z/VM

More Related Content

PPTX
Hyper-Converged Infrastructure Vx Rail
PDF
Omnibus731_overview_public20121215
PPTX
フロー技術によるネットワーク管理
PDF
TCAMのしくみ
PDF
SDN界隈の用語・考え方をざっくりまとめます。
PPTX
AWS Financial Governance Practice
PPTX
PDF
Logicadの秒間16万リクエストをさばく広告入札システムにおける、gRPCの活用事例
Hyper-Converged Infrastructure Vx Rail
Omnibus731_overview_public20121215
フロー技術によるネットワーク管理
TCAMのしくみ
SDN界隈の用語・考え方をざっくりまとめます。
AWS Financial Governance Practice
Logicadの秒間16万リクエストをさばく広告入札システムにおける、gRPCの活用事例

What's hot (20)

PDF
EC2のストレージどう使う? -Instance Storageを理解して高速IOを上手に活用!-
PDF
ネットワーク構築訓練 入門
PDF
1시간으로 끝내는 클라우드 개념_김민형 클라우드 솔루션 아키텍트
PDF
リクルート式Hadoopの使い方
PDF
Tune Up AWS Lambda
PDF
공개소프트웨어 기반 주요 클라우드 전환 사례
PPTX
SQream-GPU가속 초거대 정형데이타 분석용 SQL DB-제품소개-박문기@메가존클라우드
PPTX
WS-013T00A__M02.pptx
PDF
Perl ウェブ開発の中世〜CGI と Plack の間〜
PPTX
Edge Computing と k8s でなんか話すよ
PPTX
クラウドでも非機能要求グレードは必要だよね
PDF
AWS上で使えるストレージ十番勝負
PDF
Cephのベンチマークをしました
PDF
[웨비나] Follow me! 클라우드 인프라 구축 기본편 - 강지나 테크 에반젤리스트
PDF
ロードバランスへの長い道
PDF
Logをs3とredshiftに格納する仕組み
PDF
HCL BigFix - DNUG Stammtisch Salzburg
PDF
웹서버 부하테스트 실전 노하우
PPTX
IxVM on CML
PPTX
Cloud Architecture
EC2のストレージどう使う? -Instance Storageを理解して高速IOを上手に活用!-
ネットワーク構築訓練 入門
1시간으로 끝내는 클라우드 개념_김민형 클라우드 솔루션 아키텍트
リクルート式Hadoopの使い方
Tune Up AWS Lambda
공개소프트웨어 기반 주요 클라우드 전환 사례
SQream-GPU가속 초거대 정형데이타 분석용 SQL DB-제품소개-박문기@메가존클라우드
WS-013T00A__M02.pptx
Perl ウェブ開発の中世〜CGI と Plack の間〜
Edge Computing と k8s でなんか話すよ
クラウドでも非機能要求グレードは必要だよね
AWS上で使えるストレージ十番勝負
Cephのベンチマークをしました
[웨비나] Follow me! 클라우드 인프라 구축 기본편 - 강지나 테크 에반젤리스트
ロードバランスへの長い道
Logをs3とredshiftに格納する仕組み
HCL BigFix - DNUG Stammtisch Salzburg
웹서버 부하테스트 실전 노하우
IxVM on CML
Cloud Architecture
Ad

Similar to Linux one vs x86 (20)

PPT
LinuxONE cavemen mmit 20160505 v1.0
PDF
Exploring Github Data with Apache Drill on ARM64
PPT
Sparc t4 systems customer presentation
PDF
Rhel7 vs rhel6
PPTX
The best private cloud in the world - hands down
PDF
IBM System x3850 M2 / x3950 M2
PPTX
VMworld 2015: The Future of Software- Defined Storage- What Does it Look Like...
PDF
LCNA14: Why Use Xen for Large Scale Enterprise Deployments? - Konrad Rzeszute...
PDF
Exploring the Open Source Linux Ecosystem
 
PPTX
Webinar: OpenEBS - Still Free and now FASTEST Kubernetes storage
PDF
What's New in RHEL 6 for Linux on System z?
PDF
OpenPOWER Acceleration of HPCC Systems
PDF
Future of Power: PowerLinux - Jan Kristian Nielsen
PPTX
Ceph Day Taipei - Accelerate Ceph via SPDK
PPTX
Ibm symp14 referent_marcus alexander mac dougall_ibm x6 und flex system
PPTX
Marklogic rack proposal
PPT
Design and implementation of a reliable and cost-effective cloud computing in...
PPTX
Ceph Day Berlin: Ceph on All Flash Storage - Breaking Performance Barriers
PDF
Techmeeting-17feb2016
PDF
The Pendulum Swings Back: Converged and Hyperconverged Environments
LinuxONE cavemen mmit 20160505 v1.0
Exploring Github Data with Apache Drill on ARM64
Sparc t4 systems customer presentation
Rhel7 vs rhel6
The best private cloud in the world - hands down
IBM System x3850 M2 / x3950 M2
VMworld 2015: The Future of Software- Defined Storage- What Does it Look Like...
LCNA14: Why Use Xen for Large Scale Enterprise Deployments? - Konrad Rzeszute...
Exploring the Open Source Linux Ecosystem
 
Webinar: OpenEBS - Still Free and now FASTEST Kubernetes storage
What's New in RHEL 6 for Linux on System z?
OpenPOWER Acceleration of HPCC Systems
Future of Power: PowerLinux - Jan Kristian Nielsen
Ceph Day Taipei - Accelerate Ceph via SPDK
Ibm symp14 referent_marcus alexander mac dougall_ibm x6 und flex system
Marklogic rack proposal
Design and implementation of a reliable and cost-effective cloud computing in...
Ceph Day Berlin: Ceph on All Flash Storage - Breaking Performance Barriers
Techmeeting-17feb2016
The Pendulum Swings Back: Converged and Hyperconverged Environments
Ad

More from Diego Rodriguez (20)

PDF
Ibm flash v9000
PDF
Ibm linux one
PDF
Power linux infografica 16 de septiembre
PDF
Ibm spectrum protect
PDF
Ibm systems-sap hana-whitepaperm-kedits-final
PDF
Ibm linux one
PDF
Ibm linux one
PDF
Ibm and zato health
PDF
Ibm systems v7000
PDF
Ibm storwize v7000 unified and storwize v7000 storage systems
PDF
Ibm power 824
PDF
Hoja de datos tecnica v7000
PDF
Linux one vs x86 18 july
PDF
Ibm storwize
PDF
Ibm power 822 lc high performance computing
PDF
IBM v5000s datasheet
PDF
Ibm power 822 lc high performance computing
PDF
Ibm storwize v7000 unified and storwize v7000 storage systems
PDF
Ibm storwize v5000
PDF
Infografia power8(1)
Ibm flash v9000
Ibm linux one
Power linux infografica 16 de septiembre
Ibm spectrum protect
Ibm systems-sap hana-whitepaperm-kedits-final
Ibm linux one
Ibm linux one
Ibm and zato health
Ibm systems v7000
Ibm storwize v7000 unified and storwize v7000 storage systems
Ibm power 824
Hoja de datos tecnica v7000
Linux one vs x86 18 july
Ibm storwize
Ibm power 822 lc high performance computing
IBM v5000s datasheet
Ibm power 822 lc high performance computing
Ibm storwize v7000 unified and storwize v7000 storage systems
Ibm storwize v5000
Infografia power8(1)

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Empathic Computing: Creating Shared Understanding
PDF
Review of recent advances in non-invasive hemoglobin estimation
PDF
Blue Purple Modern Animated Computer Science Presentation.pdf.pdf
PDF
Diabetes mellitus diagnosis method based random forest with bat algorithm
PDF
7 ChatGPT Prompts to Help You Define Your Ideal Customer Profile.pdf
PPTX
Cloud computing and distributed systems.
PDF
KodekX | Application Modernization Development
PPTX
ACSFv1EN-58255 AWS Academy Cloud Security Foundations.pptx
PDF
Machine learning based COVID-19 study performance prediction
PDF
Profit Center Accounting in SAP S/4HANA, S4F28 Col11
PPTX
20250228 LYD VKU AI Blended-Learning.pptx
PDF
Building Integrated photovoltaic BIPV_UPV.pdf
PPT
Teaching material agriculture food technology
PPTX
VMware vSphere Foundation How to Sell Presentation-Ver1.4-2-14-2024.pptx
PPTX
MYSQL Presentation for SQL database connectivity
PPTX
Digital-Transformation-Roadmap-for-Companies.pptx
PPTX
KOM of Painting work and Equipment Insulation REV00 update 25-dec.pptx
PPTX
Understanding_Digital_Forensics_Presentation.pptx
PPT
“AI and Expert System Decision Support & Business Intelligence Systems”
PDF
How UI/UX Design Impacts User Retention in Mobile Apps.pdf
Empathic Computing: Creating Shared Understanding
Review of recent advances in non-invasive hemoglobin estimation
Blue Purple Modern Animated Computer Science Presentation.pdf.pdf
Diabetes mellitus diagnosis method based random forest with bat algorithm
7 ChatGPT Prompts to Help You Define Your Ideal Customer Profile.pdf
Cloud computing and distributed systems.
KodekX | Application Modernization Development
ACSFv1EN-58255 AWS Academy Cloud Security Foundations.pptx
Machine learning based COVID-19 study performance prediction
Profit Center Accounting in SAP S/4HANA, S4F28 Col11
20250228 LYD VKU AI Blended-Learning.pptx
Building Integrated photovoltaic BIPV_UPV.pdf
Teaching material agriculture food technology
VMware vSphere Foundation How to Sell Presentation-Ver1.4-2-14-2024.pptx
MYSQL Presentation for SQL database connectivity
Digital-Transformation-Roadmap-for-Companies.pptx
KOM of Painting work and Equipment Insulation REV00 update 25-dec.pptx
Understanding_Digital_Forensics_Presentation.pptx
“AI and Expert System Decision Support & Business Intelligence Systems”
How UI/UX Design Impacts User Retention in Mobile Apps.pdf

Linux one vs x86

  • 1. © 2016 IBM Corporation © 2016 IBM Corporation The disadvantages of a scale-out x86 server model are beginning to outweigh the advantages … IBM LinuxONE systems are supported by standard distributions of Red Hat, SUSE and Canonical (Ubuntu) • Up to 141 cores • Up to 10 TB memory • Up to 160 PCIe slots • Up to 20 cores • Up to 4 TB memory • Up to 32 PCIe slots • Massive scale: Single node MongoDB with a footprint of +1TB, processing +2B documents, maintains fetch times under 5ms and avoids overhead, cost and complexity of sharding 1 • Docker density: a single Emperor can create and start more than 1 million Docker containers 1 • Consolidation of x86 servers: Linux on Emperor can support up to 8000 VMs in a single footprint for large scale consolidations 2 Is low server utilization wrecking havoc in your data center? Does your business demand faster response time and more agility? Have your software costs or administration costs reached the point of unsustainable? Can your business afford to settle for only “good enough” 1 Based on results from internal lab measurements. The actual performance that any user will experience will vary depending upon considerations such as the amount of multiprogramming in the user's job stream, the I/O configuration, the storage configuration, and the workload processed. Therefore, results may vary depending on the workload and other factors. 2 Based on IBM internal measurements and projections. ™™ 14 With a huge capacity range, grow with virtually limitless scale to handle the most demanding workloads An entry point model offering similar value but with the flexibility of a smaller package For certain workloads and environments: Consolidation on large virtualized servers raises utilization, reduces core requirements, and lowers cost per workload 45% lower in cost • Spare cores for failover • RAIM memory • Built-in top to bottom security Not available on x86 servers IBM, the IBM logo, GDPS, HiperSockets, LinuxONE, LinuxONE Emperor, and LinuxONE Rockhopper, are trademarks of the International Business Machines Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States, other countries, or both. ibm.com/LinuxONE 1 Robert Frances Group, 10 Reasons LinuxONE is the Best Choice for Linux Workloads, 2015; The information and materials presented herein represent to the best of our knowledge true and accurate information as of date of publication. It nevertheless is being provided on an "as is" basis. IBM Corp. sponsored this research report. 2 This holds true for entities in developing countries that have as few as 30 Linux workloads or 20 Linux servers, as well as large enterprises with an IT infrastructure that spans across multiple data centers. 3 Performance comparison based on IBM Internal tests comparing IBM LinuxONE Rockhopper cloud with one comparably configured private x86 cloud and one comparably configured public cloud running general purpose virtual machines designed to replicate typical IBM customer workload usage in the marketplace. System configurations are based on equivalence ratios derived from IBM internal studies and are as follows: Public Cloud configuration: total of 24 general purpose instances; x86 Cloud configuration: total of two x86 systems each with 24 Intel E5-2690 v3 cores, 192GB memory, and 2x400GB SSDs; LinuxONE Rockhopper Cloud configuration: total of 8 cores, 384GB memory, and Storwize v7000 with 4x400GB SSDs. Price comparison estimates based on a 3YR Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) using publicly available U.S. street prices (current as of December 10, 2015). Public Cloud TCO estimate includes costs (US East Region) of infrastructure (instances, data out, storage, support, free tier/reserved tier discounts), middleware and labor. LinuxONE Rockhopper and x86 TCO estimates include costs of infrastructure (system, memory, storage, virtualization, OS, cloud management), middleware and labor. Results may vary based on actual workloads, system configurations, customer applications, queries and other variables in a production environment and may produce different results. Users of this document should verify the applicable data for their specific environment. 4 IDC White Paper, sponsored by IBM, Driving Digital Transformation through Infrastructure Built for Open Source: How IBM LinuxONE Addresses Agile Infrastructure Needs of Next Generation Applications, September 2015 All kind of Linux workloads • Up to 0% unplanned downtime due to hardware failures • Near-continuous availability with GDPS® Virtual Appliance • and more… The TCO for Linux applications on x86 servers can be more than 65% more expensive than on LinuxONE servers. (Robert Frances Group2,1) LinuxONE systems provide the highest levels of availability (near 100% uptime with no single point of failure), performance, throughput, and security. (Robert Frances Group1) IDC return on investment studies typically find that larger systems tend to deliver lower management costs than those associated with distributed servers. (IDC4) LUL12348-USEN-04
  • 2. © 2016 IBM Corporation © 2016 IBM Corporation ... or clone more Linux guests with a high degree of resource sharing Dynamically add cores, memory, I/O adapters, devices and network cards Grow horizontally and vertically without disruption to running environment Provision for peak utilization, unused resources automatically reallocated after peak 32 Choice of hypervisors: Hardware logical partitions (LPAR) designed for complete workload isolation1 z/VM® – supports recursion and live guest relocation KVM for LinuxONE – popular, familiar open source solution HiperSockets™ – very fast, in-memory TCP/IP connectivity IBM LinuxONE Emperor chip Micro-technology 22 nm SOI • Single Instruction Multiple Data (SIMD) • Out-of-order processing • Dense packaging: electrons can travel about 11.8 inches in a nanosecond • On-chip coprocessors Core count, speed, housing 8 core per chip, 5.0 GHz 6 chips per drawer (multiple drawer models) # Threads 2 per core Support of hardware transactional memory (HTM), I/O offload from main cores, I/O prioritization, simplified DR IBM LinuxONE Emperor has over 4x more on-chip cache per core than x86 servers … plus L4 cache not found on x86 servers!2 IBM LinuxONE has separate cores to process I/O (up to 24) and drive a dedicated I/O subsystem … unlike x86 servers!2 Only IBM LinuxONE supports Capacity on Demand – more cores when you need them. IBM LinuxONE Emperor demonstrates advantage in multiple tests1 Docker A LinuxONE Emperor runs 2000+ Docker containers on average 2.0x better than a compared x86-based system 2 IBM WebSphere® Application Server Liberty 1.5x better throughput versus a compared x86 platform running DayTrader 3, exploiting SMT and SIMD technology 3 MariaDB MariaDB has a scaling efficiency of 84% up to 32 hardware threads (16 cores). Open Source products show an excellent scaling efficiency MongoDB Up to 2.4x higher throughput versus a compared x86 system running the Yahoo Cloud Service Benchmark (YCSB) 4 Spark Up to 50% higher performance using Spark 1.4.0 versus a compared x86 platform 5 1 IBM LinuxONE is a commercial platform with EAL5 security classification. This certification means that although different workloads are running on the same hardware, they are protected when running in separate partitions; one logical partition (LPAR) cannot reach across boundaries into the next LPAR and compromise its security. 2 Evaluated LinuxONE servers are Emperor and Rockhopper, L4 cache and separate cores to process I/O are not mentioned in any x86 server specification. Scale out Scaleup 1 These claims are based on results from internal IBM lab measurements on standalone dedicated systems in a controlled environment. Results may vary depending on the workload and other factors. 2 Apache Solr search queries driven by Apache Jmeter System Stack, Emperor native LPAR on 36 cores with 755GB memory. x86-based alternative system (Lenovo System x3650 M5 w/ E5-2699 v3 processors): Native Linux on 36 CPU cores with 755GB memory, Heavy Docker Container: Apache Solr v4.10.0, WebSphere Liberty v8.5.5.2, IBM Java 1.8.0 SR1, Lightweight Docker Container: BusyBox, System SW: Docker 1.10.0-dev w/ aufs storage backend, RHEL 7.1. Note: Each active container is driven by a client thread in Apache Jmeter, which keeps sending the same Solr query repeatedly to the container to search documents that contain given key words in a pre-loaded & pre-indexed 46GB Wikipedia snapshot. The docker runtime was modified to increase a thread count limit, to avoid connection time-out, and to separate a dockerinit binary from a docker binary. A modified Linux 4.3.0 kernel to support more than 1024 network bridge ports was installed on RHEL 7.1. 3 Native LPAR on Emperor with 4 cores running SLES 12 with WAS 8.5.5.5 and IBM 64-bit SDK for Linux Java™ Technology Edition, Version 8.0.1, using HiperSockets to client and DB2 server. Lenovo x3550 M4 with 2 cores of Intel Xeon CPU E5-2640 v3 @ 2.60GHz running RHEL 7.1, with IBM 64-bit SDK for Linux Java Technology Edition, Version 8.0.1, using 10gb Ethernet to client and db2 server. 4 YCSB 0.2.0 (write-heavy, read-mostly, read-only), MongoDB 3.0.4 (WiredTiger, no sharding). Native LPAR on Emperor with SMT, RHEL 7.1. Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 HT native Linux, RHEL 7.1. 1-8 cores dedicated to MongoDB, 20 or 28 cores dedicated to YCSB. 5 The actual performance will vary depending on Spark-Perf benchmark version, Spark versions, IBM JDK versions and other factors. Spark 1.4.0 used on both platforms had Spark local, log and working directories on Ram Disk; 540672Mb was the total executor memory on both platforms. Native LPAR on Emperor with 6 cores and each core in SMT2; IBM 64- bit SDK for Java Technology Edition, Version 8 with SR1-FP10. Intel Xeon CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz, running Ubuntu 15.04 with no other workloads running; 36 physical Cores using Hyper-Threading but only 6 physical cores were used for Spark; IBM 64-bit SDK for Java Technology Edition, Version 8 SR1. LPAR Linux servers Linux Linux servers KVM or z/VM LPAR LPAR Hardware resources HiperSockets LAN KVM or z/VM