Olive View Medical Center
Emergency Department
Lean Six Sigma: Door to RME Cycle Time
Jordan Kessler, RN
1/9/2014
Project Scope: Decrease cycle time from Arrival to RME
Doctor (ESI 3-5)
• Project selection approach
1. Identified four potential projects
2. Gathered time stamp data for each potential project
3. Used benchmarks and waste walk to determine
performance gaps
4. Selected this project based on the highest score on the
project selection matrix
• Project targets
▫ Performance gap (1-5): 4 – validated by lean measures
▫ Current median time: 1 hr. and 34 minutes
▫ Goal median time: 37 minutes – based on benchmark
▫ GOAL Median Time BASED ON LEAN SIX
SIGMA MEASURE - 18 minutes
 No Wait time in between steps
 No sitting down or back and forth
 Taking only the value added time with at least
80% efficiency rate.
Current performance gap
(1= gap is small; 5= large gap with ideal performance)
4
Cost to business if NO changes made
(1= low cost; 5=high cost)
4
Impact on customer satisfaction
(1= low impact; 5= high impact)
4
Degree of waste
(1= little or no waste; 5= lots of waste)
4
Customers can be defined
(1= not easily defined; 5=easily to define)
4
Inputs can be identified
(1= hard to identify; 5easy to identify)
4
Outputs can be identified
(1= hard to identify; 5easy to identify)
5
Data is available
(1= difficult to collect or manual; 5easy to obtain,
electronic)
5
Team needed to understand / identify solutions
(1= team NOT needed; 5= team definitely needed)
4
Team has authority to implement solutions
(1= little or no authority; 5= has authority to implement)
4
Manageable project scope
(1= very large scope; 5= contained, narrow scope)
3
Total Score 45
Project Selection Matrix
ICN Desk
(2 mins)
RME
(6 mins)
Vitals
(3 mins)
Triage
(4 mins)
Registration
(3 mins)
Wait Room
Wait Room
Wait Room
Wait Room
8 minutes
13 minutes
45 minutes
10 minutes
The current process from door to doctor takes 1 hour and 34
minutes
Current Patient Flow
Current Metrics
• Total cycle time: 1 hr 34 mins
• Value added time: 13 mins
• Non-value added time: 1 hr 21 mins
• Process cycle efficiency: 13.82%
Key Definitions
• Process cycle efficiency (PCE): the
percentage of value-add time divided by total
time (cycle time)
• Value added time: time associated with work
that is desired by the customer
• Non-value added time: time related to work
not beneficial to customer – by lean standards is
waste in a process
N/A
18.75 %
33.33%
23.08%
11.76%
Efficiency
Process Step
(VA Time)
Wait Time
(NVA Time)
Key Highlights
Value added time
Total cycle time
PCE
ICN Desk
(2 mins)
RME
(6 mins)
Vitals
(3 mins)
Triage
(4 mins)
Registration
(3 mins)
Wait Room
Triage Wait Line
RME Wait Line
Wait Room
15 minutes
The goal of the proposed process is to get from door to doctor
in 37 minutes
Proposed Patient Flow
N/A
100 %
100%
42.86%
21.05%
Registration
(3 Mins)
Efficiency
Process Step
(VA Time)
Wait Time
(NVA Time)
Proposed Metrics- Benchmark
Total cycle time: 37 mins
• Value added time: 18 mins
• Non-value added time: 19 mins
Process cycle efficiency: 48.65%
Proposed Metrics- Ideal – Lean SS Standard
Total cycle time: 18 min
• Value added time: 13 mins
• Non-value added time: 0 to 5 min
Process cycle efficiency: 80% to 100%
Key Proposed Changes
• Patients are pushed to the next step rather than
pulled from the waiting room
• Registration should be a parallel process with the
clinical assessment
• The RME MD/NP does not waste time looking for
the next patient
• Limit microphone usage and time wasted finding
patients/rooms
• Eliminate time wasted for RME orders due to no
quick registration
4 minutes
Key Highlights
DOOR
Security
I
C
N
T7
Q
R
E
G
T4T2T1 T3
D
O
O
R
DOOR
CONCERIGE
Space Flow Assessment -Spaghetti Chart - CURRENT
DOOR
Security
I
C
N
T7
Q
R
E
G
T4T2T1 T3
D
O
O
R
DOOR
QREG
CONCERIGE
NP Designated MSE Designated
MSEDesignated
Qreg Designated
Space Flow Assessment -Spaghetti Chart - PROPOSED
DOOR
Security
T7
R
E
G
T4T2T1 T3
D
O
O
R
DOOR
CONCERIGE
NP Designated MSE Designated
MSEDesignated
Space Flow Assessment -Spaghetti Chart - PROPOSED
ICN/Q-REG
Information Booth
NEXT STEPS
• Analyze the detailed Process Flow (approx 60 steps) with PFS Co-participant, committee and
stakeholders to eliminate waste in the process and implement parallel functions
• Conduct Kaizen events to implement phased changes
Phase I – Registration with clinical functions
Phase II – Physical re-configuration of patient flow
Phase III- Eliminating all the wasted steps in the process

More Related Content

PPTX
Project Quality Management
PPTX
Gestão de Projeto Ágil
PPTX
3.2 ANALYZE PHASE.pptx
PPTX
ETI Wastewater Consulting Presentation
PPTX
Lean Tools and resulting ROI 2015
PPT
Project Quality Management powerpoint
PPTX
Quality in project management
PDF
Six sigma-black-belt-project-sample
Project Quality Management
Gestão de Projeto Ágil
3.2 ANALYZE PHASE.pptx
ETI Wastewater Consulting Presentation
Lean Tools and resulting ROI 2015
Project Quality Management powerpoint
Quality in project management
Six sigma-black-belt-project-sample

What's hot (18)

PPT
Recruitment Aug. 2015
PDF
Pmp quality chapter 8
PPTX
Key steps in transforming a calibration program slideshare
PPSX
Things to keep in mind before starting a test plan
PDF
Test Metrics and KPIs
PPTX
Scenario - Project Management Processes | 1 of 2
PPT
Lean Six Sigma How To Conduct A Lean Event
PPT
Quality managemnt day 2 material
PPT
Five Steps For Continuous Improvement of a South Carolina Business Process
PDF
Big Apple Scrum Day 2015 - Advanced Scrum Metrics Presentation
PDF
Process Development And Implementation 777
PPTX
A LEAN Six Sixgma Implementation plan
PPTX
Comp10 unit10 lecture_slides
PPT
process groups and knowledge areas
PPT
Site Overview & 5 S
PPTX
Lean six sigma foundations
PDF
Problem Solving using Six Sigma
PDF
Curriculum vitae
Recruitment Aug. 2015
Pmp quality chapter 8
Key steps in transforming a calibration program slideshare
Things to keep in mind before starting a test plan
Test Metrics and KPIs
Scenario - Project Management Processes | 1 of 2
Lean Six Sigma How To Conduct A Lean Event
Quality managemnt day 2 material
Five Steps For Continuous Improvement of a South Carolina Business Process
Big Apple Scrum Day 2015 - Advanced Scrum Metrics Presentation
Process Development And Implementation 777
A LEAN Six Sixgma Implementation plan
Comp10 unit10 lecture_slides
process groups and knowledge areas
Site Overview & 5 S
Lean six sigma foundations
Problem Solving using Six Sigma
Curriculum vitae
Ad

Similar to LSS-OVMC (20)

PDF
Introduction to Lean Management Dr Richard Guerrero_Wessex AHSN
PPTX
Rehab Project
PPT
PPTX
Lean presentation amc
PDF
Mapping the End to End Process
PPTX
Redefining Workflows with Lean and Simulation
PPT
2 Brian Hudson Lean 6 Sigma
PDF
Lean Healthcare & Lean Design
PDF
The Lean Journey at Flinders Medical Centre
PPT
Brians Presn
PPT
Leadership institute lean kaizen briefing 8 16 13 handout
PDF
Delivering care in efficient environment medicall 2011 [compatibility mode]
PPT
PDF
L03_10_Things_Leaders
PPTX
Lean Software Development Is for Everyone
PPTX
Lean healthcare
PDF
Have you tried to lean your IT Service Management? by Daniel Breston
PPTX
Lean, Six Sigma and Innovation: Natural Companions
PPT
Lean thinking
PPTX
Agile Kolkata 13-14 Sep 2024 | Is AI needed for every process? by Subhabrata ...
Introduction to Lean Management Dr Richard Guerrero_Wessex AHSN
Rehab Project
Lean presentation amc
Mapping the End to End Process
Redefining Workflows with Lean and Simulation
2 Brian Hudson Lean 6 Sigma
Lean Healthcare & Lean Design
The Lean Journey at Flinders Medical Centre
Brians Presn
Leadership institute lean kaizen briefing 8 16 13 handout
Delivering care in efficient environment medicall 2011 [compatibility mode]
L03_10_Things_Leaders
Lean Software Development Is for Everyone
Lean healthcare
Have you tried to lean your IT Service Management? by Daniel Breston
Lean, Six Sigma and Innovation: Natural Companions
Lean thinking
Agile Kolkata 13-14 Sep 2024 | Is AI needed for every process? by Subhabrata ...
Ad

More from Jordan Kessler (9)

PPTX
Implementing Evidence Based Practice at BJU
PPTX
assignment 4
DOCX
Kessler Research Issue Brief
DOCX
AED policy
PPTX
CPR presentation
PDF
Food Allergy Guidelines for Nurses
DOCX
Healthcare Dashboard Group 3
PDF
Kessler_PolicyBrief
Implementing Evidence Based Practice at BJU
assignment 4
Kessler Research Issue Brief
AED policy
CPR presentation
Food Allergy Guidelines for Nurses
Healthcare Dashboard Group 3
Kessler_PolicyBrief

LSS-OVMC

  • 1. Olive View Medical Center Emergency Department Lean Six Sigma: Door to RME Cycle Time Jordan Kessler, RN 1/9/2014
  • 2. Project Scope: Decrease cycle time from Arrival to RME Doctor (ESI 3-5) • Project selection approach 1. Identified four potential projects 2. Gathered time stamp data for each potential project 3. Used benchmarks and waste walk to determine performance gaps 4. Selected this project based on the highest score on the project selection matrix • Project targets ▫ Performance gap (1-5): 4 – validated by lean measures ▫ Current median time: 1 hr. and 34 minutes ▫ Goal median time: 37 minutes – based on benchmark ▫ GOAL Median Time BASED ON LEAN SIX SIGMA MEASURE - 18 minutes  No Wait time in between steps  No sitting down or back and forth  Taking only the value added time with at least 80% efficiency rate. Current performance gap (1= gap is small; 5= large gap with ideal performance) 4 Cost to business if NO changes made (1= low cost; 5=high cost) 4 Impact on customer satisfaction (1= low impact; 5= high impact) 4 Degree of waste (1= little or no waste; 5= lots of waste) 4 Customers can be defined (1= not easily defined; 5=easily to define) 4 Inputs can be identified (1= hard to identify; 5easy to identify) 4 Outputs can be identified (1= hard to identify; 5easy to identify) 5 Data is available (1= difficult to collect or manual; 5easy to obtain, electronic) 5 Team needed to understand / identify solutions (1= team NOT needed; 5= team definitely needed) 4 Team has authority to implement solutions (1= little or no authority; 5= has authority to implement) 4 Manageable project scope (1= very large scope; 5= contained, narrow scope) 3 Total Score 45 Project Selection Matrix
  • 3. ICN Desk (2 mins) RME (6 mins) Vitals (3 mins) Triage (4 mins) Registration (3 mins) Wait Room Wait Room Wait Room Wait Room 8 minutes 13 minutes 45 minutes 10 minutes The current process from door to doctor takes 1 hour and 34 minutes Current Patient Flow Current Metrics • Total cycle time: 1 hr 34 mins • Value added time: 13 mins • Non-value added time: 1 hr 21 mins • Process cycle efficiency: 13.82% Key Definitions • Process cycle efficiency (PCE): the percentage of value-add time divided by total time (cycle time) • Value added time: time associated with work that is desired by the customer • Non-value added time: time related to work not beneficial to customer – by lean standards is waste in a process N/A 18.75 % 33.33% 23.08% 11.76% Efficiency Process Step (VA Time) Wait Time (NVA Time) Key Highlights Value added time Total cycle time PCE
  • 4. ICN Desk (2 mins) RME (6 mins) Vitals (3 mins) Triage (4 mins) Registration (3 mins) Wait Room Triage Wait Line RME Wait Line Wait Room 15 minutes The goal of the proposed process is to get from door to doctor in 37 minutes Proposed Patient Flow N/A 100 % 100% 42.86% 21.05% Registration (3 Mins) Efficiency Process Step (VA Time) Wait Time (NVA Time) Proposed Metrics- Benchmark Total cycle time: 37 mins • Value added time: 18 mins • Non-value added time: 19 mins Process cycle efficiency: 48.65% Proposed Metrics- Ideal – Lean SS Standard Total cycle time: 18 min • Value added time: 13 mins • Non-value added time: 0 to 5 min Process cycle efficiency: 80% to 100% Key Proposed Changes • Patients are pushed to the next step rather than pulled from the waiting room • Registration should be a parallel process with the clinical assessment • The RME MD/NP does not waste time looking for the next patient • Limit microphone usage and time wasted finding patients/rooms • Eliminate time wasted for RME orders due to no quick registration 4 minutes Key Highlights
  • 6. DOOR Security I C N T7 Q R E G T4T2T1 T3 D O O R DOOR QREG CONCERIGE NP Designated MSE Designated MSEDesignated Qreg Designated Space Flow Assessment -Spaghetti Chart - PROPOSED
  • 7. DOOR Security T7 R E G T4T2T1 T3 D O O R DOOR CONCERIGE NP Designated MSE Designated MSEDesignated Space Flow Assessment -Spaghetti Chart - PROPOSED ICN/Q-REG Information Booth
  • 8. NEXT STEPS • Analyze the detailed Process Flow (approx 60 steps) with PFS Co-participant, committee and stakeholders to eliminate waste in the process and implement parallel functions • Conduct Kaizen events to implement phased changes Phase I – Registration with clinical functions Phase II – Physical re-configuration of patient flow Phase III- Eliminating all the wasted steps in the process