SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Module
10
Compression Members
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
Lesson
21
Definitions,
Classifications,
Guidelines and
Assumptions
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
Instructional Objectives:
At the end of this lesson, the student should be able to:
• define effective length, pedestal, column and wall,
• classify the columns based on types of reinforcement, loadings and
slenderness ratios,
• identify and explain the functions of bracing in a braced column,
• determine the minimum and maximum percentage of longitudinal
reinforcement,
• determine the minimum numbers and diameter of bars in rectangular and
circular columns,
• determine the longitudinal reinforcement in a pedestal,
• determine the type, pitch and diameter of lateral ties of columns after
determining the longitudinal steel,
• state the assumptions in the design of compression member by limit state
of collapse,
• determine the strain distribution lines of a compression member subjected
to axial load with or without the moments about one or both the axes,
• explain the need of the minimum eccentricity to be considered in the
design of compression members.
10.21.1 Introduction
Compression members are structural elements primarily subjected to axial
compressive forces and hence, their design is guided by considerations of
strength and buckling. Figures 10.21.1a to c show their examples: pedestal,
column, wall and strut. While pedestal, column and wall carry the loads along its
length l in vertical direction, the strut in truss carries loads in any direction. The
letters l, b and D represent the unsupported vertical length, horizontal lest
lateral dimension, width and the horizontal longer lateral dimension, depth. These
compression members may be made of bricks or reinforced concrete. Herein,
reinforced concrete compression members are only discussed.
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
This module is intended to explain the definition of some common
terminologies and to illustrate the design of compression members and other
related issues. This lesson, however, explain the definitions and classifications of
columns depending on different aspects. Further, the recommendations of IS 456
to be followed in the design are discussed regarding the longitudinal and lateral
reinforcing bars. The assumptions made in the design of compression member
by limit sate of collapse are illustrated.
10.21.2 Definitions
(a) Effective length: The vertical distance between the points of inflection
of the compression member in the buckled configuration in a plane is termed as
effective length le of that compression member in that plane. The effective
length is different from the unsupported length l of the member, though it
depends on the unsupported length and the type of end restraints. The relation
between the effective and unsupported lengths of any compression member is
le = k l
(10.1)
where k is the ratio of effective to the unsupported lengths. Clause 25.2 of IS
456 stipulates the effective lengths of compression members (vide Annex E of IS
456). This parameter is needed in classifying and designing the compression
members.
(b) Pedestal: Pedestal is a vertical compression member whose effective
length le does not exceed three times of its least horizontal dimension b (cl.
26.5.3.1h, Note). The other horizontal dimension D shall not exceed four times
of b (Fig.10.21.1a).
(c) Column: Column is a vertical compression member whose
unsupported length l shall not exceed sixty times of b (least lateral dimension),
if restrained at the two ends. Further, its unsupported length of a cantilever
column shall not exceed 100b2
/D, where D is the larger lateral dimension which
is also restricted up to four times of b (vide cl. 25.3 of IS 456 and Fig.10.21.1b).
(d) Wall: Wall is a vertical compression member whose effective height
Hwe to thickness t (least lateral dimension) shall not exceed 30 (cl. 32.2.3 of IS
456). The larger horizontal dimension i.e., the length of the wall L is more than
4t (Fig.10.21.1c).
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
10.21.3 Classification of Columns Based on Types of
Reinforcement
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
Based on the types of reinforcement, the reinforced concrete columns are
classified into three groups:
(i) Tied columns: The main longitudinal reinforcement bars are enclosed
within closely spaced lateral ties (Fig.10.21.2a).
(ii) Columns with helical reinforcement: The main longitudinal
reinforcement bars are enclosed within closely spaced and continuously wound
spiral reinforcement. Circular and octagonal columns are mostly of this type
(Fig.10.21.2b).
(iii) Composite columns: The main longitudinal reinforcement of the
composite columns consists of structural steel sections or pipes with or without
longitudinal bars (Fig.20.21.2c and d).
Out of the three types of columns, the tied columns are mostly common
with different shapes of the cross-sections viz. square, rectangular, T-, L-, cross
etc. Helically bound columns are also used for circular or octagonal shapes of
cross-sections. Architects prefer circular columns in some specific situations for
the functional requirement. This module, accordingly takes up these two types
(tied and helically bound) of reinforced concrete columns.
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
10.21.4 Classification of Columns Based on Loadings
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
Columns are classified into the three following types based on the
loadings:
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
(i) Columns subjected to axial loads only (concentric), as shown in
Fig.20.21.3a.
(ii) Columns subjected to combined axial load and uniaxial bending, as
shown in Fig.10.21.3b.
(iii) Columns subjected to combined axial load and bi-axial bending, as
shown in Fig.10.21.3c.
Figure 10.21.4 shows the plan view of a reinforced concrete rigid frame
having columns and inter-connecting beams in longitudinal and transverse
directions. From the knowledge of structural analysis it is well known that the
bending moments on the left and right of columns for every longitudinal beam will
be comparable as the beam is continuous. Similarly, the bending moments at the
two sides of columns for every continuous transverse beam are also comparable
(neglecting small amounts due to differences of l1, l2, l3 and b1, b2, b3, b4).
Therefore, all internal columns (C1a to C1f) will be designed for axial force only.
The side columns (C2a to C2j) will have axial forces with uniaxial bending
moment, while the four corner columns (C3a to C3d) shall have axial forces with
bi-axial bending moments. Thus, all internal columns (C1a to C1f), side columns
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
(C2a to C2j) and corner columns (C3a to C3d) are the columns of type (i), (ii) and
(iii), respectively.
It is worth mentioning that pure axial forces in the inside columns is a rare
case. Due to rigid frame action, lateral loadings and practical aspects of
construction, there will be bending moments and horizontal shear in all the inside
columns also. Similarly, side columns and corner columns will have the column
shear along with the axial force and bending moments in one or both directions,
respectively. The effects of shear are usually neglected as the magnitude is very
small. Moreover, the presence of longitudinal and transverse reinforcement is
sufficient to resist the effect of column shear of comparatively low magnitude.
The effect of some minimum bending moment, however, should be taken into
account in the design even if the column is axially loaded. Accordingly, cls. 39.2
and 25.4 of IS 456 prescribes the minimum eccentricity for the design of all
columns. In case the actual eccentricity is more than the minimum, that should
be considered in the design.
10.21.5 Classification of Columns Based on Slenderness
Ratios
Columns are classified into the following two types based on the
slenderness ratios:
(i) Short columns
(ii) Slender or long columns
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
Figure 10.21.5 presents the three modes of failure of columns with
different slenderness ratios when loaded axially. In the mode 1, column does not
undergo any lateral deformation and collapses due to material failure. This is
known as compression failure. Due to the combined effects of axial load and
moment a short column may have material failure of mode 2. On the other hand,
a slender column subjected to axial load only undergoes deflection due to beam-
column effect and may have material failure under the combined action of direct
load and bending moment. Such failure is called combined compression and
bending failure of mode 2. Mode 3 failure is by elastic instability of very long
column even under small load much before the material reaches the yield
stresses. This type of failure is known as elastic buckling.
The slenderness ratio of steel column is the ratio of its effective length le
to its least radius of gyration r. In case of reinforced concrete column, however,
IS 456 stipulates the slenderness ratio as the ratio of its effective length le to its
least lateral dimension. As mentioned earlier in sec. 10.21.2(a), the effective
length le is different from the unsupported length, the rectangular reinforced
concrete column of cross-sectional dimensions b and D shall have two
effective lengths in the two directions of b and D. Accordingly, the column may
have the possibility of buckling depending on the two values of slenderness
ratios as given below:
Slenderness ratio about the major axis = lex/D
Slenderness ratio about the minor axis = ley/b
Based on the discussion above, cl. 25.1.2 of IS 456 stipulates the
following:
A compression member may be considered as short when both the
slenderness ratios lex/D and ley/b are less than 12 where lex = effective length
in respect of the major axis, D = depth in respect of the major axis, ley = effective
length in respect of the minor axis, and b = width of the member. It shall
otherwise be considered as a slender compression member.
Further, it is essential to avoid the mode 3 type of failure of columns so
that all columns should have material failure (modes 1 and 2) only. Accordingly,
cl. 25.3.1 of IS 456 stipulates the maximum unsupported length between two
restraints of a column to sixty times its least lateral dimension. For cantilever
columns, when one end of the column is unrestrained, the unsupported length is
restricted to 100b2
/D where b and D are as defined earlier.
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
10.21.6 Braced and unbraced columns
It is desirable that the columns do not have to resist any horizontal loads
due to wind or earthquake. This can be achieved by bracing the columns as in
the case of columns of a water tank or tall buildings (Figs.10.21.6a and b).
Lateral tie members for the columns of water tank or shear walls for the columns
of tall buildings resist the horizontal forces and these columns are called braced
columns. Unbraced columns are supposed to resist the horizontal loads also.
The bracings can be in one or more directions depending on the directions of the
lateral loads. It is worth mentioning that the effect of bracing has been taken into
account by the IS code in determining the effective lengths of columns (vide
Annex E of IS 456).
10.21.7 Longitudinal Reinforcement
The longitudinal reinforcing bars carry the compressive loads along with
the concrete. Clause 26.5.3.1 stipulates the guidelines regarding the minimum
and maximum amount, number of bars, minimum diameter of bars, spacing of
bars etc. The following are the salient points:
(a) The minimum amount of steel should be at least 0.8 per cent of the
gross cross-sectional area of the column required if for any reason the provided
area is more than the required area.
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
(b) The maximum amount of steel should be 4 per cent of the gross cross-
sectional area of the column so that it does not exceed 6 per cent when bars
from column below have to be lapped with those in the column under
consideration.
(c) Four and six are the minimum number of longitudinal bars in
rectangular and circular columns, respectively.
(d) The diameter of the longitudinal bars should be at least 12 mm.
(e) Columns having helical reinforcement shall have at least six
longitudinal bars within and in contact with the helical reinforcement. The bars
shall be placed equidistant around its inner circumference.
(f) The bars shall be spaced not exceeding 300 mm along the periphery
of the column.
(g) The amount of reinforcement for pedestal shall be at least 0.15 per
cent of the cross-sectional area provided.
10.21.8 Transverse Reinforcement
Transverse reinforcing bars are provided in forms of circular rings,
polygonal links (lateral ties) with internal angles not exceeding 135o
or helical
reinforcement. The transverse reinforcing bars are provided to ensure that every
longitudinal bar nearest to the compression face has effective lateral support
against buckling. Clause 26.5.3.2 stipulates the guidelines of the arrangement of
transverse reinforcement. The salient points are:
(a) Transverse reinforcement shall only go round corner and alternate
bars if the longitudinal bars are not spaced more than 75 mm on either side
(Fig.10.21.7).
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
(b) Longitudinal bars spaced at a maximum distance of 48 times the
diameter of the tie shall be tied by single tie and additional open ties for in
between longitudinal bars (Fig.10.21.8).
(c) For longitudinal bars placed in more than one row (Fig.10.21.9): (i)
transverse reinforcement is provided for the outer-most row in accordance with
(a) above, and (ii) no bar of the inner row is closer to the nearest compression
face than three times the diameter of the largest bar in the inner row.
(d) For longitudinal bars arranged in a group such that they are not in
contact and each group is adequately tied as per (a), (b) or (c) above, as
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
appropriate, the transverse reinforcement for the compression member as a
whole may be provided assuming that each group is a single longitudinal bar for
determining the pitch and diameter of the transverse reinforcement as given in
sec.10.21.9. The diameter of such transverse reinforcement should not, however,
exceed 20 mm (Fig.10.21.10).
10.21.9 Pitch and Diameter of Lateral Ties
(a) Pitch: The maximum pitch of transverse reinforcement shall be the
least of the following:
(i) the least lateral dimension of the compression members;
(ii) sixteen times the smallest diameter of the longitudinal
reinforcement bar to be tied; and
(iii) 300 mm.
(b) Diameter: The diameter of the polygonal links or lateral ties shall be
not less than one-fourth of the diameter of the largest longitudinal bar, and in no
case less than 6 mm.
10.21.10 Helical Reinforcement
(a) Pitch: Helical reinforcement shall be of regular formation with the turns
of the helix spaced evenly and its ends shall be anchored properly by providing
one and a half extra turns of the spiral bar. The pitch of helical reinforcement
shall be determined as given in sec.10.21.9 for all cases except where an
increased load on the column is allowed for on the strength of the helical
reinforcement. In such cases only, the maximum pitch shall be the lesser of 75
mm and one-sixth of the core diameter of the column, and the minimum pitch
shall be the lesser of 25 mm and three times the diameter of the steel bar
forming the helix.
(b) Diameter: The diameter of the helical reinforcement shall be as
mentioned in sec.10.21.9b.
10.21.11 Assumptions in the Design of Compression
Members by Limit State of Collapse
It is thus seen that reinforced concrete columns have different
classifications depending on the types of reinforcement, loadings and
slenderness ratios. Detailed designs of all the different classes are beyond the
scope here. Tied and helically reinforced short and slender columns subjected to
axial loadings with or without the combined effects of uniaxial or biaxial bending
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
will be taken up. However, the basic assumptions of the design of any of the
columns under different classifications are the same. The assumptions (i) to (v)
given in sec.3.4.2 of Lesson 4 for the design of flexural members are also
applicable here. Furthermore, the following are the additional assumptions for the
design of compression members (cl. 39.1 of IS 456).
(i) The maximum compressive strain in concrete in axial compression
is taken as 0.002.
(ii) The maximum compressive strain at the highly compressed
extreme fibre in concrete subjected to axial compression and
bending and when there is no tension on the section shall be
0.0035 minus 0.75 times the strain at the least compressed
extreme fibre.
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
The assumptions (i) to (v) of section 3.4.2 of Lesson 4 and (i) and (ii)
mentioned above are discussed below with reference to Fig.10.21.11a to c
presenting the cross-section and strain diagrams for different location of the
neutral axis.
The discussion made in sec. 3.4.2 of Lesson 4 regarding the assumptions
(i), (iii), (iv) and (v) are applicable here also. Assumption (ii) of sec.3.4.2 is also
applicable here when kD, the depth of neutral axis from the highly compressed
right edge is within the section i.e., k < 1. The corresponding strain profile IN in
Fig.10.21.11b is for particular value of P and M such that the maximum
compressive strain is 0.0035 at the highly compressed right edge and tensile
strain develops at the opposite edge. This strain profile is very much similar to
that of a beam in flexure of Lesson 4.
The additional assumption (i) of this section refers to column subjected
axial load P only resulting compressive strain of maximum (constant) value of
0.002 and for which the strain profile is EF in Fig.10.21.11b. The neutral axis is at
infinity (outside the section).
Extending the assumption of the strain profile IN (Fig.10.21.11b), we can
draw another strain profile IH (Fig.10.21.11c) having maximum compressive
strain of 0.0035 at the right edge and zero strain at the left edge. This strain
profile 1H along with EF are drawn in Fig.10.21.11c to intersect at V. From the
two similar triangles EVI and GHI, we have
EV/GH = 0.0015/0.0035 = 3/7, which gives
EV = 3D/7
(10.2)
The point V, where the two profiles intersect is assumed to act as a fulcrum for
the strain profiles when the neutral axis lies outside the section. Another strain
profile JK drawn on this figure passing through the fulcrum V and whose neutral
axis is outside the section. The maximum compressive strain GJ of this profile is
related to the minimum compressive strain HK as explained below.
GJ = GI – IJ = GI – 0.75 HK, as we can write IJ in term of HK from two
similar triangles JVI and HVK:
IJ/HK = VE/VF = 0.75.
The value of the maximum compressive strain GJ for the profile JK is,
therefore, 0.0035 minus 0.75 times the strain HK on the least compressed edge.
This is the assumption (ii) of this section (cl. 39.1b of IS 456).
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
10.21.12 Minimum Eccentricity
Section 10.21.4 illustrates that in practical construction, columns are rarely
truly concentric. Even a theoretical column loaded axially will have accidental
eccentricity due to inaccuracy in construction or variation of materials etc.
Accordingly, all axially loaded columns should be designed considering the
minimum eccentricity as stipulated in cl. 25.4 of IS 456 and given below
(Fig.10.21.3c)
ex min ≥ greater of )l/500 + D/30) or 20 mm
(10.3)
ey min ≥ greater of )l/500 + b/30) or 20 mm
where l, D and b are the unsupported length, larger lateral dimension and least
lateral dimension, respectively.
10.21.13 Practice Questions and Problems with Answers
Q.1: Define effective length, pedestal, column and wall.
A.1: See sec. 10.21.2.
Q.2: Classify the columns based on types of reinforcement.
A.2: See sec. 10.21.3
Q.3: Classify the columns based on loadings.
A.3: See sec. 10.21.4.
Q.4: Classify the columns based on slenderness ratios.
A.4: See Sec. 10.21.5
Q.5: Explain braced and unbraced columns.
A.5: See sec. 10.21.6.
Q.6: Answer the following:
(a) What are the minimum and maximum amounts of longitudinal
reinforcement in a column?
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
(b) What are the minimum numbers of longitudinal bars in rectangular and
circular columns?
(c) What is the amount of longitudinal reinforcement in a pedestal?
(d) What is the maximum pitch of transverse reinforcement in a column?
(e) What is the diameter of lateral ties in a column?
A.6: (a) 0.8% and 4%
(b) 4 and 6
(c) 0.15% of cross-sectional area of the pedestal
(d) See sec. 10.21.9(a)
(e) See sec. 10.21.9(b).
Q.7: Explain the assumptions of determining the strain distribution lines in a
column subjected to axial force and biaxial bending.
A.7: See sec. 10.21.11(i) and (ii).
Q.8: State the minimum eccentricity of a rectangular column for designing.
A.8: See sec. 10.21.12.
10.21.14 References
1. Reinforced Concrete Limit State Design, 6th
Edition, by Ashok K. Jain,
Nem Chand & Bros, Roorkee, 2002.
2. Limit State Design of Reinforced Concrete, 2nd
Edition, by P.C.Varghese,
Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 2002.
3. Advanced Reinforced Concrete Design, by P.C.Varghese, Prentice-Hall of
India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 2001.
4. Reinforced Concrete Design, 2nd
Edition, by S.Unnikrishna Pillai and
Devdas Menon, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New
Delhi, 2003.
5. Limit State Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures, by P.Dayaratnam,
Oxford & I.B.H. Publishing Company Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 2004.
6. Reinforced Concrete Design, 1st
Revised Edition, by S.N.Sinha, Tata
McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. New Delhi, 1990.
7. Reinforced Concrete, 6th
Edition, by S.K.Mallick and A.P.Gupta, Oxford &
IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, 1996.
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
8. Behaviour, Analysis & Design of Reinforced Concrete Structural Elements,
by I.C.Syal and R.K.Ummat, A.H.Wheeler & Co. Ltd., Allahabad, 1989.
9. Reinforced Concrete Structures, 3rd
Edition, by I.C.Syal and A.K.Goel,
A.H.Wheeler & Co. Ltd., Allahabad, 1992.
10.Textbook of R.C.C, by G.S.Birdie and J.S.Birdie, Wiley Eastern Limited,
New Delhi, 1993.
11.Design of Concrete Structures, 13th
Edition, by Arthur H. Nilson, David
Darwin and Charles W. Dolan, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company
Limited, New Delhi, 2004.
12.Concrete Technology, by A.M.Neville and J.J.Brooks, ELBS with
Longman, 1994.
13.Properties of Concrete, 4th
Edition, 1st
Indian reprint, by A.M.Neville,
Longman, 2000.
14.Reinforced Concrete Designer’s Handbook, 10th
Edition, by C.E.Reynolds
and J.C.Steedman, E & FN SPON, London, 1997.
15.Indian Standard Plain and Reinforced Concrete – Code of Practice (4th
Revision), IS 456: 2000, BIS, New Delhi.
16.Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete to IS: 456 – 1978, BIS, New Delhi.
10.21.15 Test 21 with Solutions
Maximum Marks = 50, Maximum Time = 30 minutes
Answer all questions carrying equal marks.
TQ.1: Define effective length, pedestal, column and wall.
A.TQ.1: See sec. 10.21.2.
TQ.2: Classify the columns separately based on loadings and slenderness
ratios.
A.TQ.2: See secs. 10.21.4 and 5.
TQ.3: Explain braced and unbraced columns.
A.TQ.3: See sec. 10.21.6.
TQ.4: Answer the following:
(a) What are the minimum and maximum amounts of longitudinal
reinforcement in a column?
(b) What are the minimum numbers of longitudinal bars in rectangular
and circular columns?
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
(c) What is the amount of longitudinal reinforcement in a pedestal?
(d) What is the maximum pitch of transverse reinforcement in a column?
(e) What is the diameter of lateral ties in a column?
A.TQ.4: (a) 0.8% and 4%
(b) 4 and 6
(c) 0.15% of cross-sectional area of the pedestal
(d) See sec. 10.21.9(a)
(e) See sec. 10.21.9(b).
TQ.5: Explain the assumptions of determining the strain distribution lines in a
column subjected to axial force and biaxial bending.
A.TQ.5: See sec. 10.21.11(i) and (ii).
10.21.16 Summary of this Lesson
This lesson defines the effective length, pedestal, column and wall. Three
different classifications of columns based on types of reinforcement, loadings
slenderness ratio are explained. The need and functions of bracings are
illustrated. The guidelines of IS 456 are discussed regarding the types,
arrangement, minimum numbers and diameter of bars, pitch and other aspects of
longitudinal and transverse reinforcement of columns. The assumptions needed
for the design of compression members are illustrated. The determination of
strain distribution lines are explained depending on the location of the neutral
axis. The need for considering the minimum eccentricity and its amount are
explained.
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

More Related Content

PDF
Design for Short Axially Loaded Columns ACI318
PDF
Columns rajeevan sir
PPTX
Introduction to design of rcc column
PDF
Analysis and Design of Rectangular and L-Shaped Columns Subjected to Axial Lo...
PDF
Onewayslab
DOC
Chapter 1
PPTX
Design of short columns using helical reinforcement
Design for Short Axially Loaded Columns ACI318
Columns rajeevan sir
Introduction to design of rcc column
Analysis and Design of Rectangular and L-Shaped Columns Subjected to Axial Lo...
Onewayslab
Chapter 1
Design of short columns using helical reinforcement

What's hot (20)

PDF
Slab Design-(BNBC & ACI)
PDF
Column design1
DOC
Reinfored beam
PDF
Design of Beam- RCC Singly Reinforced Beam
PDF
M10l23
PDF
Cross section analysis and design: Worked examples
PDF
M10l27
PPTX
S 160225072749
PPTX
T beam design by WSD method
PDF
Ch8 Truss Bridges (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Prof. Dr. Metwally ...
PPTX
Design of beams
PDF
Lec.5 strength design method rectangular sections 1
PDF
Reinforced concrete column
PDF
Shear Strenth Of Reinforced Concrete Beams Per ACI-318-02
DOC
Reinforced slab
PDF
Design of One-Way Slab
PPTX
Design of floor slab
PDF
Design of steel beams
Slab Design-(BNBC & ACI)
Column design1
Reinfored beam
Design of Beam- RCC Singly Reinforced Beam
M10l23
Cross section analysis and design: Worked examples
M10l27
S 160225072749
T beam design by WSD method
Ch8 Truss Bridges (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Prof. Dr. Metwally ...
Design of beams
Lec.5 strength design method rectangular sections 1
Reinforced concrete column
Shear Strenth Of Reinforced Concrete Beams Per ACI-318-02
Reinforced slab
Design of One-Way Slab
Design of floor slab
Design of steel beams
Ad

Similar to M10l21 (20)

PPT
Design of columns axial load as per IS 456-2000
PPTX
Building project rc column
PDF
Sd i-module4- rajesh sir
PDF
M10l27
PPTX
Moneef presentation 515 .DFSDFSDFSDFpptx
PDF
Lecture note on column design
PPTX
Reinforced column design
PDF
Bond strength and developement length
PPT
Design of columns as per IS 456-2000
PPTX
reinforced concrete design material of engineering
PPTX
presentation
PDF
H slabs
PDF
Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000
PDF
Analytical Study on Behaviour of RC Deep Beam with Steel Shear Plate and with...
PDF
M10l24
PDF
PPTX
RCC column_Shortly Axially Loaded column.pptx
PDF
transmission line tower design
PDF
Tower design
PPTX
DEEP FINal presentation according a.pptx
Design of columns axial load as per IS 456-2000
Building project rc column
Sd i-module4- rajesh sir
M10l27
Moneef presentation 515 .DFSDFSDFSDFpptx
Lecture note on column design
Reinforced column design
Bond strength and developement length
Design of columns as per IS 456-2000
reinforced concrete design material of engineering
presentation
H slabs
Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000
Analytical Study on Behaviour of RC Deep Beam with Steel Shear Plate and with...
M10l24
RCC column_Shortly Axially Loaded column.pptx
transmission line tower design
Tower design
DEEP FINal presentation according a.pptx
Ad

More from imaduddin91 (20)

PDF
07 a80102 groundwaterdevelopmentandmanagement
PDF
Remotesensingandgisapplications
PDF
R05410107 advancedfoundationengineering
PDF
07 a80101 advanced structural design
PDF
07 a70401 remotesensingandgisapplications
PDF
07 a70102 finite element methods in civil engineering
PDF
R05410103 remotesensingandgisapplications
PDF
R05410102 finiteelementmethodsincivilengineering
PDF
07 a60105 estimatingandcosting
PDF
07 a82101 advanced structural design
PDF
07 a80106 pavementanalysisanddesign
PDF
07 a80104 watershedmanagement
PDF
07 a80102 groundwaterdevelopmentandmanagement
PDF
07 a70110 remotesensingandgisapplications
PDF
07 a70107 waterresourcessystemplanningandmanagement
PDF
07 a70102 finite element methods in civil engineering
PDF
07 a60105 estimatingandcosting
PDF
Statistical metods
PDF
Sas cheat
PDF
Sas language reference concepts
07 a80102 groundwaterdevelopmentandmanagement
Remotesensingandgisapplications
R05410107 advancedfoundationengineering
07 a80101 advanced structural design
07 a70401 remotesensingandgisapplications
07 a70102 finite element methods in civil engineering
R05410103 remotesensingandgisapplications
R05410102 finiteelementmethodsincivilengineering
07 a60105 estimatingandcosting
07 a82101 advanced structural design
07 a80106 pavementanalysisanddesign
07 a80104 watershedmanagement
07 a80102 groundwaterdevelopmentandmanagement
07 a70110 remotesensingandgisapplications
07 a70107 waterresourcessystemplanningandmanagement
07 a70102 finite element methods in civil engineering
07 a60105 estimatingandcosting
Statistical metods
Sas cheat
Sas language reference concepts

M10l21

  • 3. Instructional Objectives: At the end of this lesson, the student should be able to: • define effective length, pedestal, column and wall, • classify the columns based on types of reinforcement, loadings and slenderness ratios, • identify and explain the functions of bracing in a braced column, • determine the minimum and maximum percentage of longitudinal reinforcement, • determine the minimum numbers and diameter of bars in rectangular and circular columns, • determine the longitudinal reinforcement in a pedestal, • determine the type, pitch and diameter of lateral ties of columns after determining the longitudinal steel, • state the assumptions in the design of compression member by limit state of collapse, • determine the strain distribution lines of a compression member subjected to axial load with or without the moments about one or both the axes, • explain the need of the minimum eccentricity to be considered in the design of compression members. 10.21.1 Introduction Compression members are structural elements primarily subjected to axial compressive forces and hence, their design is guided by considerations of strength and buckling. Figures 10.21.1a to c show their examples: pedestal, column, wall and strut. While pedestal, column and wall carry the loads along its length l in vertical direction, the strut in truss carries loads in any direction. The letters l, b and D represent the unsupported vertical length, horizontal lest lateral dimension, width and the horizontal longer lateral dimension, depth. These compression members may be made of bricks or reinforced concrete. Herein, reinforced concrete compression members are only discussed. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
  • 4. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
  • 5. This module is intended to explain the definition of some common terminologies and to illustrate the design of compression members and other related issues. This lesson, however, explain the definitions and classifications of columns depending on different aspects. Further, the recommendations of IS 456 to be followed in the design are discussed regarding the longitudinal and lateral reinforcing bars. The assumptions made in the design of compression member by limit sate of collapse are illustrated. 10.21.2 Definitions (a) Effective length: The vertical distance between the points of inflection of the compression member in the buckled configuration in a plane is termed as effective length le of that compression member in that plane. The effective length is different from the unsupported length l of the member, though it depends on the unsupported length and the type of end restraints. The relation between the effective and unsupported lengths of any compression member is le = k l (10.1) where k is the ratio of effective to the unsupported lengths. Clause 25.2 of IS 456 stipulates the effective lengths of compression members (vide Annex E of IS 456). This parameter is needed in classifying and designing the compression members. (b) Pedestal: Pedestal is a vertical compression member whose effective length le does not exceed three times of its least horizontal dimension b (cl. 26.5.3.1h, Note). The other horizontal dimension D shall not exceed four times of b (Fig.10.21.1a). (c) Column: Column is a vertical compression member whose unsupported length l shall not exceed sixty times of b (least lateral dimension), if restrained at the two ends. Further, its unsupported length of a cantilever column shall not exceed 100b2 /D, where D is the larger lateral dimension which is also restricted up to four times of b (vide cl. 25.3 of IS 456 and Fig.10.21.1b). (d) Wall: Wall is a vertical compression member whose effective height Hwe to thickness t (least lateral dimension) shall not exceed 30 (cl. 32.2.3 of IS 456). The larger horizontal dimension i.e., the length of the wall L is more than 4t (Fig.10.21.1c). Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
  • 6. 10.21.3 Classification of Columns Based on Types of Reinforcement Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
  • 7. Based on the types of reinforcement, the reinforced concrete columns are classified into three groups: (i) Tied columns: The main longitudinal reinforcement bars are enclosed within closely spaced lateral ties (Fig.10.21.2a). (ii) Columns with helical reinforcement: The main longitudinal reinforcement bars are enclosed within closely spaced and continuously wound spiral reinforcement. Circular and octagonal columns are mostly of this type (Fig.10.21.2b). (iii) Composite columns: The main longitudinal reinforcement of the composite columns consists of structural steel sections or pipes with or without longitudinal bars (Fig.20.21.2c and d). Out of the three types of columns, the tied columns are mostly common with different shapes of the cross-sections viz. square, rectangular, T-, L-, cross etc. Helically bound columns are also used for circular or octagonal shapes of cross-sections. Architects prefer circular columns in some specific situations for the functional requirement. This module, accordingly takes up these two types (tied and helically bound) of reinforced concrete columns. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
  • 8. 10.21.4 Classification of Columns Based on Loadings Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
  • 9. Columns are classified into the three following types based on the loadings: Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
  • 10. (i) Columns subjected to axial loads only (concentric), as shown in Fig.20.21.3a. (ii) Columns subjected to combined axial load and uniaxial bending, as shown in Fig.10.21.3b. (iii) Columns subjected to combined axial load and bi-axial bending, as shown in Fig.10.21.3c. Figure 10.21.4 shows the plan view of a reinforced concrete rigid frame having columns and inter-connecting beams in longitudinal and transverse directions. From the knowledge of structural analysis it is well known that the bending moments on the left and right of columns for every longitudinal beam will be comparable as the beam is continuous. Similarly, the bending moments at the two sides of columns for every continuous transverse beam are also comparable (neglecting small amounts due to differences of l1, l2, l3 and b1, b2, b3, b4). Therefore, all internal columns (C1a to C1f) will be designed for axial force only. The side columns (C2a to C2j) will have axial forces with uniaxial bending moment, while the four corner columns (C3a to C3d) shall have axial forces with bi-axial bending moments. Thus, all internal columns (C1a to C1f), side columns Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
  • 11. (C2a to C2j) and corner columns (C3a to C3d) are the columns of type (i), (ii) and (iii), respectively. It is worth mentioning that pure axial forces in the inside columns is a rare case. Due to rigid frame action, lateral loadings and practical aspects of construction, there will be bending moments and horizontal shear in all the inside columns also. Similarly, side columns and corner columns will have the column shear along with the axial force and bending moments in one or both directions, respectively. The effects of shear are usually neglected as the magnitude is very small. Moreover, the presence of longitudinal and transverse reinforcement is sufficient to resist the effect of column shear of comparatively low magnitude. The effect of some minimum bending moment, however, should be taken into account in the design even if the column is axially loaded. Accordingly, cls. 39.2 and 25.4 of IS 456 prescribes the minimum eccentricity for the design of all columns. In case the actual eccentricity is more than the minimum, that should be considered in the design. 10.21.5 Classification of Columns Based on Slenderness Ratios Columns are classified into the following two types based on the slenderness ratios: (i) Short columns (ii) Slender or long columns Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
  • 12. Figure 10.21.5 presents the three modes of failure of columns with different slenderness ratios when loaded axially. In the mode 1, column does not undergo any lateral deformation and collapses due to material failure. This is known as compression failure. Due to the combined effects of axial load and moment a short column may have material failure of mode 2. On the other hand, a slender column subjected to axial load only undergoes deflection due to beam- column effect and may have material failure under the combined action of direct load and bending moment. Such failure is called combined compression and bending failure of mode 2. Mode 3 failure is by elastic instability of very long column even under small load much before the material reaches the yield stresses. This type of failure is known as elastic buckling. The slenderness ratio of steel column is the ratio of its effective length le to its least radius of gyration r. In case of reinforced concrete column, however, IS 456 stipulates the slenderness ratio as the ratio of its effective length le to its least lateral dimension. As mentioned earlier in sec. 10.21.2(a), the effective length le is different from the unsupported length, the rectangular reinforced concrete column of cross-sectional dimensions b and D shall have two effective lengths in the two directions of b and D. Accordingly, the column may have the possibility of buckling depending on the two values of slenderness ratios as given below: Slenderness ratio about the major axis = lex/D Slenderness ratio about the minor axis = ley/b Based on the discussion above, cl. 25.1.2 of IS 456 stipulates the following: A compression member may be considered as short when both the slenderness ratios lex/D and ley/b are less than 12 where lex = effective length in respect of the major axis, D = depth in respect of the major axis, ley = effective length in respect of the minor axis, and b = width of the member. It shall otherwise be considered as a slender compression member. Further, it is essential to avoid the mode 3 type of failure of columns so that all columns should have material failure (modes 1 and 2) only. Accordingly, cl. 25.3.1 of IS 456 stipulates the maximum unsupported length between two restraints of a column to sixty times its least lateral dimension. For cantilever columns, when one end of the column is unrestrained, the unsupported length is restricted to 100b2 /D where b and D are as defined earlier. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
  • 13. 10.21.6 Braced and unbraced columns It is desirable that the columns do not have to resist any horizontal loads due to wind or earthquake. This can be achieved by bracing the columns as in the case of columns of a water tank or tall buildings (Figs.10.21.6a and b). Lateral tie members for the columns of water tank or shear walls for the columns of tall buildings resist the horizontal forces and these columns are called braced columns. Unbraced columns are supposed to resist the horizontal loads also. The bracings can be in one or more directions depending on the directions of the lateral loads. It is worth mentioning that the effect of bracing has been taken into account by the IS code in determining the effective lengths of columns (vide Annex E of IS 456). 10.21.7 Longitudinal Reinforcement The longitudinal reinforcing bars carry the compressive loads along with the concrete. Clause 26.5.3.1 stipulates the guidelines regarding the minimum and maximum amount, number of bars, minimum diameter of bars, spacing of bars etc. The following are the salient points: (a) The minimum amount of steel should be at least 0.8 per cent of the gross cross-sectional area of the column required if for any reason the provided area is more than the required area. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
  • 14. (b) The maximum amount of steel should be 4 per cent of the gross cross- sectional area of the column so that it does not exceed 6 per cent when bars from column below have to be lapped with those in the column under consideration. (c) Four and six are the minimum number of longitudinal bars in rectangular and circular columns, respectively. (d) The diameter of the longitudinal bars should be at least 12 mm. (e) Columns having helical reinforcement shall have at least six longitudinal bars within and in contact with the helical reinforcement. The bars shall be placed equidistant around its inner circumference. (f) The bars shall be spaced not exceeding 300 mm along the periphery of the column. (g) The amount of reinforcement for pedestal shall be at least 0.15 per cent of the cross-sectional area provided. 10.21.8 Transverse Reinforcement Transverse reinforcing bars are provided in forms of circular rings, polygonal links (lateral ties) with internal angles not exceeding 135o or helical reinforcement. The transverse reinforcing bars are provided to ensure that every longitudinal bar nearest to the compression face has effective lateral support against buckling. Clause 26.5.3.2 stipulates the guidelines of the arrangement of transverse reinforcement. The salient points are: (a) Transverse reinforcement shall only go round corner and alternate bars if the longitudinal bars are not spaced more than 75 mm on either side (Fig.10.21.7). Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
  • 15. (b) Longitudinal bars spaced at a maximum distance of 48 times the diameter of the tie shall be tied by single tie and additional open ties for in between longitudinal bars (Fig.10.21.8). (c) For longitudinal bars placed in more than one row (Fig.10.21.9): (i) transverse reinforcement is provided for the outer-most row in accordance with (a) above, and (ii) no bar of the inner row is closer to the nearest compression face than three times the diameter of the largest bar in the inner row. (d) For longitudinal bars arranged in a group such that they are not in contact and each group is adequately tied as per (a), (b) or (c) above, as Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
  • 16. appropriate, the transverse reinforcement for the compression member as a whole may be provided assuming that each group is a single longitudinal bar for determining the pitch and diameter of the transverse reinforcement as given in sec.10.21.9. The diameter of such transverse reinforcement should not, however, exceed 20 mm (Fig.10.21.10). 10.21.9 Pitch and Diameter of Lateral Ties (a) Pitch: The maximum pitch of transverse reinforcement shall be the least of the following: (i) the least lateral dimension of the compression members; (ii) sixteen times the smallest diameter of the longitudinal reinforcement bar to be tied; and (iii) 300 mm. (b) Diameter: The diameter of the polygonal links or lateral ties shall be not less than one-fourth of the diameter of the largest longitudinal bar, and in no case less than 6 mm. 10.21.10 Helical Reinforcement (a) Pitch: Helical reinforcement shall be of regular formation with the turns of the helix spaced evenly and its ends shall be anchored properly by providing one and a half extra turns of the spiral bar. The pitch of helical reinforcement shall be determined as given in sec.10.21.9 for all cases except where an increased load on the column is allowed for on the strength of the helical reinforcement. In such cases only, the maximum pitch shall be the lesser of 75 mm and one-sixth of the core diameter of the column, and the minimum pitch shall be the lesser of 25 mm and three times the diameter of the steel bar forming the helix. (b) Diameter: The diameter of the helical reinforcement shall be as mentioned in sec.10.21.9b. 10.21.11 Assumptions in the Design of Compression Members by Limit State of Collapse It is thus seen that reinforced concrete columns have different classifications depending on the types of reinforcement, loadings and slenderness ratios. Detailed designs of all the different classes are beyond the scope here. Tied and helically reinforced short and slender columns subjected to axial loadings with or without the combined effects of uniaxial or biaxial bending Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
  • 17. will be taken up. However, the basic assumptions of the design of any of the columns under different classifications are the same. The assumptions (i) to (v) given in sec.3.4.2 of Lesson 4 for the design of flexural members are also applicable here. Furthermore, the following are the additional assumptions for the design of compression members (cl. 39.1 of IS 456). (i) The maximum compressive strain in concrete in axial compression is taken as 0.002. (ii) The maximum compressive strain at the highly compressed extreme fibre in concrete subjected to axial compression and bending and when there is no tension on the section shall be 0.0035 minus 0.75 times the strain at the least compressed extreme fibre. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
  • 18. The assumptions (i) to (v) of section 3.4.2 of Lesson 4 and (i) and (ii) mentioned above are discussed below with reference to Fig.10.21.11a to c presenting the cross-section and strain diagrams for different location of the neutral axis. The discussion made in sec. 3.4.2 of Lesson 4 regarding the assumptions (i), (iii), (iv) and (v) are applicable here also. Assumption (ii) of sec.3.4.2 is also applicable here when kD, the depth of neutral axis from the highly compressed right edge is within the section i.e., k < 1. The corresponding strain profile IN in Fig.10.21.11b is for particular value of P and M such that the maximum compressive strain is 0.0035 at the highly compressed right edge and tensile strain develops at the opposite edge. This strain profile is very much similar to that of a beam in flexure of Lesson 4. The additional assumption (i) of this section refers to column subjected axial load P only resulting compressive strain of maximum (constant) value of 0.002 and for which the strain profile is EF in Fig.10.21.11b. The neutral axis is at infinity (outside the section). Extending the assumption of the strain profile IN (Fig.10.21.11b), we can draw another strain profile IH (Fig.10.21.11c) having maximum compressive strain of 0.0035 at the right edge and zero strain at the left edge. This strain profile 1H along with EF are drawn in Fig.10.21.11c to intersect at V. From the two similar triangles EVI and GHI, we have EV/GH = 0.0015/0.0035 = 3/7, which gives EV = 3D/7 (10.2) The point V, where the two profiles intersect is assumed to act as a fulcrum for the strain profiles when the neutral axis lies outside the section. Another strain profile JK drawn on this figure passing through the fulcrum V and whose neutral axis is outside the section. The maximum compressive strain GJ of this profile is related to the minimum compressive strain HK as explained below. GJ = GI – IJ = GI – 0.75 HK, as we can write IJ in term of HK from two similar triangles JVI and HVK: IJ/HK = VE/VF = 0.75. The value of the maximum compressive strain GJ for the profile JK is, therefore, 0.0035 minus 0.75 times the strain HK on the least compressed edge. This is the assumption (ii) of this section (cl. 39.1b of IS 456). Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
  • 19. 10.21.12 Minimum Eccentricity Section 10.21.4 illustrates that in practical construction, columns are rarely truly concentric. Even a theoretical column loaded axially will have accidental eccentricity due to inaccuracy in construction or variation of materials etc. Accordingly, all axially loaded columns should be designed considering the minimum eccentricity as stipulated in cl. 25.4 of IS 456 and given below (Fig.10.21.3c) ex min ≥ greater of )l/500 + D/30) or 20 mm (10.3) ey min ≥ greater of )l/500 + b/30) or 20 mm where l, D and b are the unsupported length, larger lateral dimension and least lateral dimension, respectively. 10.21.13 Practice Questions and Problems with Answers Q.1: Define effective length, pedestal, column and wall. A.1: See sec. 10.21.2. Q.2: Classify the columns based on types of reinforcement. A.2: See sec. 10.21.3 Q.3: Classify the columns based on loadings. A.3: See sec. 10.21.4. Q.4: Classify the columns based on slenderness ratios. A.4: See Sec. 10.21.5 Q.5: Explain braced and unbraced columns. A.5: See sec. 10.21.6. Q.6: Answer the following: (a) What are the minimum and maximum amounts of longitudinal reinforcement in a column? Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
  • 20. (b) What are the minimum numbers of longitudinal bars in rectangular and circular columns? (c) What is the amount of longitudinal reinforcement in a pedestal? (d) What is the maximum pitch of transverse reinforcement in a column? (e) What is the diameter of lateral ties in a column? A.6: (a) 0.8% and 4% (b) 4 and 6 (c) 0.15% of cross-sectional area of the pedestal (d) See sec. 10.21.9(a) (e) See sec. 10.21.9(b). Q.7: Explain the assumptions of determining the strain distribution lines in a column subjected to axial force and biaxial bending. A.7: See sec. 10.21.11(i) and (ii). Q.8: State the minimum eccentricity of a rectangular column for designing. A.8: See sec. 10.21.12. 10.21.14 References 1. Reinforced Concrete Limit State Design, 6th Edition, by Ashok K. Jain, Nem Chand & Bros, Roorkee, 2002. 2. Limit State Design of Reinforced Concrete, 2nd Edition, by P.C.Varghese, Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 2002. 3. Advanced Reinforced Concrete Design, by P.C.Varghese, Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 2001. 4. Reinforced Concrete Design, 2nd Edition, by S.Unnikrishna Pillai and Devdas Menon, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi, 2003. 5. Limit State Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures, by P.Dayaratnam, Oxford & I.B.H. Publishing Company Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 2004. 6. Reinforced Concrete Design, 1st Revised Edition, by S.N.Sinha, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. New Delhi, 1990. 7. Reinforced Concrete, 6th Edition, by S.K.Mallick and A.P.Gupta, Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, 1996. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
  • 21. 8. Behaviour, Analysis & Design of Reinforced Concrete Structural Elements, by I.C.Syal and R.K.Ummat, A.H.Wheeler & Co. Ltd., Allahabad, 1989. 9. Reinforced Concrete Structures, 3rd Edition, by I.C.Syal and A.K.Goel, A.H.Wheeler & Co. Ltd., Allahabad, 1992. 10.Textbook of R.C.C, by G.S.Birdie and J.S.Birdie, Wiley Eastern Limited, New Delhi, 1993. 11.Design of Concrete Structures, 13th Edition, by Arthur H. Nilson, David Darwin and Charles W. Dolan, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi, 2004. 12.Concrete Technology, by A.M.Neville and J.J.Brooks, ELBS with Longman, 1994. 13.Properties of Concrete, 4th Edition, 1st Indian reprint, by A.M.Neville, Longman, 2000. 14.Reinforced Concrete Designer’s Handbook, 10th Edition, by C.E.Reynolds and J.C.Steedman, E & FN SPON, London, 1997. 15.Indian Standard Plain and Reinforced Concrete – Code of Practice (4th Revision), IS 456: 2000, BIS, New Delhi. 16.Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete to IS: 456 – 1978, BIS, New Delhi. 10.21.15 Test 21 with Solutions Maximum Marks = 50, Maximum Time = 30 minutes Answer all questions carrying equal marks. TQ.1: Define effective length, pedestal, column and wall. A.TQ.1: See sec. 10.21.2. TQ.2: Classify the columns separately based on loadings and slenderness ratios. A.TQ.2: See secs. 10.21.4 and 5. TQ.3: Explain braced and unbraced columns. A.TQ.3: See sec. 10.21.6. TQ.4: Answer the following: (a) What are the minimum and maximum amounts of longitudinal reinforcement in a column? (b) What are the minimum numbers of longitudinal bars in rectangular and circular columns? Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
  • 22. (c) What is the amount of longitudinal reinforcement in a pedestal? (d) What is the maximum pitch of transverse reinforcement in a column? (e) What is the diameter of lateral ties in a column? A.TQ.4: (a) 0.8% and 4% (b) 4 and 6 (c) 0.15% of cross-sectional area of the pedestal (d) See sec. 10.21.9(a) (e) See sec. 10.21.9(b). TQ.5: Explain the assumptions of determining the strain distribution lines in a column subjected to axial force and biaxial bending. A.TQ.5: See sec. 10.21.11(i) and (ii). 10.21.16 Summary of this Lesson This lesson defines the effective length, pedestal, column and wall. Three different classifications of columns based on types of reinforcement, loadings slenderness ratio are explained. The need and functions of bracings are illustrated. The guidelines of IS 456 are discussed regarding the types, arrangement, minimum numbers and diameter of bars, pitch and other aspects of longitudinal and transverse reinforcement of columns. The assumptions needed for the design of compression members are illustrated. The determination of strain distribution lines are explained depending on the location of the neutral axis. The need for considering the minimum eccentricity and its amount are explained. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur