Master Scheduling
Introduction


                                              Products into
                                             product groups.
                          They
                          combine                                        Which alltogether
 Aggregate Production                         Demand into
                                                                         reflect Top Management
   & Capacity Plans                           monthly totals.            Decisions.
                                                  Personnel
                                                Requirements
                                              across departments


   Eventually, the time comes when individual “end item” products and services
   must be scheduled at specific work centers.

                   This is accomplished by master scheduling

Which means, producing a SUPPLY PLAN (a time table including quantities) to produce specific
items or provide specific services within a given time period.
Master Schedule & the Master Production Schedule (MPS)




The master schedule (MS) is a
                                           Example : A simple MS for an MPS item (end
presentation of the demand, including      product)
the forecast and the backlog (customer
orders received), the master production
schedule (the supply plan), the
projected on hand (POH) inventory, and
the available-to-promise (ATP) quantity.


The master production schedule (MPS)
is the primary output of the master
scheduling process.It is the “plan” for
providing the supply to meet the
demand.                                                        Table 1
Relationship of Master Scheduling to other MPC activities

                                                                                   Is the “key” in
                                       Creates demand          Creates demand      developing the
                                        requirements            requirements           master
                                                                                      schedule
The master schedule (MS) is a key
link in the manufacturing planning
and control chain.
The MS interfaces with
marketing, distribution
planning, production planning, and
capacity planning.
The MS drives the material
requirements planning (MRP) system.
Master scheduling calculates the
quantity required to meet demand
                                            Is the “key”
requirements from all sources (see               link
                                                                                Calculates net
                                                                                requirements
the example case on next page).

                                      Input-Output Control &
                                       Operation Scheduling       Figure 1
Example : A case in which the distribution requirements are the gross requirements
              for the MS

                                                               Here, the MS;
                                                                 enables marketing to make
                                                                 legitimate delivery commitments
                                                                 to field warehouses and final
                                                                 customers.
                                                                 enables production to evaluate
                                                                 capacity requirements in a
                                                                 more detailed manner.
                                                                 provides to management the
                                                                 opportunity to ascertain whether
                                                                 the business plan and its
                                                                 strategic objectives will be
                                                                 achieved.


                                                     Table 2
     Distribution
                           Net Requirements are
 requirements (gross
                          calculated by MRP logic.
requirements for MS)
Understanding THE ENVIRONMENT in which master
                                   scheduling takes place.

Before describing the activities involved in creating and managing the MS,
we need to examine the different organizational environments in
which master scheduling takes place.

            THESE ENVIRONMENTS ARE DETERMINED BY
          the company’s STRATEGIC RESPONSES to;




         the INTERESTS of
           CUSTOMERS
                               and             the ACTIONS of
                                                COMPETITORS



                        Thus, a COMPETETIVE
                         STRATEGY evolves...
The Role and Structure of Master Scheduling

Master Scheduling is a business process designed to balance
demand and supply at the detailed, mix level. Master Scheduling
is primarily a decision-making process, performed by an
individual called the Master Scheduler. As such, it is people-
centered; the computer’s role is to support the people in
their decision-making activities.
The output from this process is the Master Production
Schedule, which is the anticipated build schedule for specific
products (or parts of products) and customer orders. The Master
Schedule is:
• time-phased,
• extends for a number of weeks into the future, and
• is typically expressed in weekly time increments or smaller.
Inputs & outputs of master
                                   scheduling:
                         Capacity Company Product Economic
                         Consts. Policies Charact. Considerations



     Placed Orders                                             Master Production
Forecasted Demand                                              Schedule:
                                        MPS                    When & How Much
Current and Planned
                                                               to produce for each
Availability, eg.,
                                                               product
•Initial Inventory,
•Initiated Production,
•Subcontracted
quantities                      Planning   Time
                                Horizon    unit
                                                                    Capacity
                                                                    Planning
Rough-Cut Capacity Planning


• RCCP checks whether critical resources are
  available to support the preliminary master
  production schedules. Critical resources
  include bottleneck operations, labor, and
  critical materials.
MASTER PRODUCTION SCHEDULING PROCESS

Figure 1 shows the master production scheduling process. Operations must first
create a prospective MPS to test whether it meets the schedule with the
resources(e.g., machine capacities, labor, overtime, and subcontractors) provided
for in the aggregate production plan. Operations revises the MPS until it obtains a
schedule that satisfies all resource limitations or determines that no feasible
schedule can bedeveloped. In the latter event, the production plan must be
revised to adjust production requirements or increase authorized resources.
Once a feasible prospective MPShas been accepted by plant
management, operations uses the authorized MPS as input to material
requirements planning. Operations can then determine specific schedules for
component production and assembly. Actual performance data such as inventory
levels and shortages are inputs to the next prospective MPS, and the master
production scheduling process is repeated.
Master scheduling
DEVELOPING A MASTER PRODUCTION SCHEDULE



The process of developing a master production schedule includes

    (1) calculating the projected on-hand inventory
    (2) determining the timing and size of the production quantities of specific
    products


Step 1. Calculate Projected On-Hand Inventories. The first step is to calculate the
projected on-hand inventory, which is an estimate of the amount of inventory
available each week after demand has been satisfied:
In some weeks, there may be no MPS quantity for a product because
sufficient inventory already exists. For the projected requirements for
this week, the scheduler uses whichever is larger—the forecast or the
customer orders booked—recognizing that the forecast is subject to
error. If actual booked orders exceed the forecast, the projection will be
more accurate if the scheduler uses the booked orders because booked
orders are a known quantity. Conversely, if the forecast exceeds booked
orders for a week, the forecast will provide a better estimate of
requirements for that week because some orders are yet to come in.
Example
The manufacturer of the ladder-back chair produces the chair to stock and needs
to develop an MPS for it. Marketing has forecasted a demand of 30 chairs for the
first week of April, but actual customer orders booked are for 38 chairs. The
current on-hand inventory is 55 chairs. No MPS quantity is due in week 1. Figure
2 shows an MPS record with these quantities listed. As actual orders for week 1
are greater than the forecast, the scheduler uses that figure for actual orders in
calculating the projected inventory balance at the end of week 1:
In week 2, the
forecasted
quantity exceeds
actual        orders
booked, so the
projected
on-hand inventory
for the end of
week 2 is 17 + 0 -
30=      -13.   The
shortage signals
the need for more
chairs in week 2.
Step 2. Determine the Timing and Size of MPS Quantities. The goal of
determining the timing and size of MPS quantities is to maintain a
nonnegative projected on-hand inventory balance.
As shortages in inventory are detected, MPS quantities should be
scheduled to cover them, The first MPS quantity should be scheduled
for the week when the projected on-hand inventory reflects a
shortage, such as week 2 in Figure 2 The scheduler adds the MPS
quantity to the projected on-hand inventory and searches for the next
period when a shortage occurs. This shortage signals a need for a
second MPS quantity, and so on.
Figure 3 shows a master production schedule for the ladder-back chair for
the next eight weeks. The order policy requires production lot sizes of 150
units. A shortage of 13 chairs in week 2 will occur unless the scheduler
provides for an MPS quantity for that period.
Master scheduling
Once the MPS quantity is scheduled, the updated projected inventory balance
for week 2 is




  The scheduler proceeds column by column through the MPS record until
  reaching the end, filling in the MPS quantities as needed to avoid
  shortages. The 137 units will satisfy forecasted demands until week
  7, when the inventory shortage in the absence of an MPS quantity is 7 + 0
  -35 =-28. This shortage signals the need for another MPS quantity of 150
  units. The updated inventory balance is 7 + 150 - 35 = 122 chairs for week
  7.
   The last row in Figure 3 indicates the periods in which production of the
   MPS quantities must begin so that they will be available when indicated in
   the MPS quantity row.
a lead time of one week is indicated for the ladder-back chair; that is, one week is
needed to assemble 150 ladder-back chairs, assuming that items B, C, D, and E are
available. For each MPS quantity, the scheduler works backward through the lead
time to determine when the assembly department must start producing chairs.
Consequently, a lot of 150 units must be started in week 1 and another in week 6.
AVAILABLE-TO-PROMISE QUANTITIES



In addition to providing manufacturing with the timing and size of
production quantities ,the MPS provides marketing with information
that is useful in negotiating delivery dates with customers. The
quantity of end items that marketing can promise to deliver on
specified dates is called available-to-promise (ATP) inventory. It is
the difference between the customer orders already booked and the
quantity that operations is planning to produce. As new customer
orders are accepted, the ATP inventory is reduced to reflect
commitment of the firm to ship those quantities, but the actual
inventory stays unchanged until the order is removed from inventory
and shipped to the customer. An available-to-promise inventory is
associated with each MPS quantity because the MPS quantity
specifies the timing and size of new stock that can be earmarked to
meet future bookings.
Figure 4 shows an MPS record with an additional row for the available-to promise
quantities. The ATP in week 2 is the MPS quantity minus booked customer
orders until the next MPS quantity, or 150 - (27 + 24 + 8 + 0 + 0) = 91 units. The
ATP indicates to marketing that, of the 150 units scheduled for completion in
week 2, 91 units are uncommitted, and total new orders up to that quantity can
be promised for delivery as early as week 2. In week 7, the ATP is 150 units
because there are no booked orders in week 7 and beyond.
The procedure for calculating available-to-promise information is slightly different
for the first (current) week of the schedule than for other weeks because it
accounts for the inventory currently in stock. The ATP inventory for the first week
equals current on-hand inventory plus the MPS quantity for the first week, minus
the cumulative total of booked orders up to (but not including) the week in which
the next MPS quantity arrives. So, in Figure 4, the ATP for the first week is 55 + 0 -
38 = 17.
Master scheduling
This information indicates to the sales department that it can promise as
many as 17 units this week, 91 more units sometime in weeks 2 through
6, and 150 more units in week 7 or 8. If customer order requests exceed
ATP quantities in those time periods, the MPS must be changed before the
customer orders can be booked or the customers must be given a later
delivery date—when the next MPS quantity arrives. See the solved
problem at the end of this supplement for an example of decision making
using the ATP quantities.
FREEZING THE MPS
many firms, particularly those with a make-to-stock strategy and a focus
on low-cost operations, freeze, or disallow changes to, a portion of the
MPS. Freezing can be accomplished by specifying a demand time
fence, which is the number of periods (beginning with the current
period) during which few, if any, changescan be made to the MPS
(i.e., the MPS is firm). Companies select the demand time fence after
considering the costs of making changes to the MPS:
Other time fences that allow varying amounts of change can be specified.
For example, the planning time fence typically covers a longer period than
the demand time fence.
Example :
The number of time fences can vary. Black & Decker uses three time fences:
8, 13, and 26 weeks. The 8-week fence is essentially a demand time fence. From 8
to 13 weeks, the MPS is quite rigid, but minor changes to model series may be
made if components are available. From 13 to 26 weeks, substitution of one end
item for another is permitted as long as the production plan is not violated and
components are available. Beyond 26 weeks, marketing can make changes as long
as they are compatible with the production plan.
SOLVED PROBLEM

The order policy is to produce end item A in lots of 50 units. Using the data
shown in Figure 6 and the FOQ lot-sizing rule, complete the projected on-hand
inventory and MPS quantity rows. Then complete the MPS start row by
offsetting the MPS quantities for the final assembly lead time. Finally, compute
the available-to-promise inventory for item A. If in week 1, a customer requests
a new order for 30 units of item A, when is the earliest date the entire order
could be shipped?


The projected on-hand inventory for the second week is
Master scheduling
where requirements are the larger of the forecast or actual customer orders
booked for shipment during this period. No MPS quantity is required.
Without an MPS quantity in the third period, there will be a shortage of item A:
5 + 0 - 40 =- 35.
Therefore, an MPS quantity equal to the lot size of 50 must be scheduled for
completion in the third period. Then the projected on-hand inventory for the
third week will be 5 + 50 - 40 = 15.
Figure K.7 shows the projected on-hand inventories and MPS quantities from
OM Explorer that would result from completing the MPS calculations. The MPS
start row is completed by simply shifting a copy of the MPS quantity row to the
left by one column to account for the one-week final assembly lead time. Also
shown are the available-to-promise quantities. In week 1, the ATP is
Master scheduling
The ATP for the MPS quantity in week 3 is




 The other ATPs equal their respective MPS quantities because there are no booked
 orders for those weeks. As for the new order for 30 units, the earliest it can be
 shipped is week 3 because the ATP for week 1 is insufficient. If the customer accepts
 the delivery date of week 3, the ATP for week 1 will stay at 5 units and the ATP for
 week 3 will be reduced to 5 units. This acceptance allows the firm the flexibility
 to immediately satisfy an order for 5 units or less, if one comes in. The customer
 orders booked for week 3 would be increased to 35 to reflect the new order’s
 shipping date.

More Related Content

PPT
Aggregate planning
PPT
Chapter 17 inventory management
PPTX
Aggregate planning and mps om
DOC
Alan Hurd Strategic 100 Day Action Plan Example
PPT
Principles of economics (Chapter 2)
PPT
4. the project in the organizational structure
PPTX
Forecasting Models & Their Applications
PPTX
types of production system
Aggregate planning
Chapter 17 inventory management
Aggregate planning and mps om
Alan Hurd Strategic 100 Day Action Plan Example
Principles of economics (Chapter 2)
4. the project in the organizational structure
Forecasting Models & Their Applications
types of production system

What's hot (20)

PPTX
PPTX
Material requirement planning, MRP.
PPT
Mrp ii
PPTX
small and effective ppt on master production schedule
PPT
Material requirement planning presentation
PPTX
MRP CASE STUDY
PPTX
Material requirement planning (mrp1)
PPT
Master Scheduling
PPTX
Capacity planning
PPT
Material requirement planning presentation
PPTX
Aggregate Planning Report
PPTX
The Capacity Requirement Planning
PPTX
Material Requirement Planning (mrp)
PPT
Material requirement planning presentation
PPT
(Mrp 1) Prsntation Slides
DOCX
material requirement planning
PPT
Material Resource Planning
PPTX
manufacturing resource planning
PPTX
Walmart Supply Chain Management ( Case study)
PPTX
Material requirement planning, MRP.
Mrp ii
small and effective ppt on master production schedule
Material requirement planning presentation
MRP CASE STUDY
Material requirement planning (mrp1)
Master Scheduling
Capacity planning
Material requirement planning presentation
Aggregate Planning Report
The Capacity Requirement Planning
Material Requirement Planning (mrp)
Material requirement planning presentation
(Mrp 1) Prsntation Slides
material requirement planning
Material Resource Planning
manufacturing resource planning
Walmart Supply Chain Management ( Case study)
Ad

Viewers also liked (7)

PPT
Master production schedule
PPTX
Master Production Scheduling (MPS)
PPTX
Mrp, mrp 2 n bpr
PPTX
Just In Time Production (JIT)
DOCX
MRP, MRP2 and ERP system in supply chain
PPTX
Just in time manufacturing ppt
Master production schedule
Master Production Scheduling (MPS)
Mrp, mrp 2 n bpr
Just In Time Production (JIT)
MRP, MRP2 and ERP system in supply chain
Just in time manufacturing ppt
Ad

Similar to Master scheduling (20)

PDF
Reflections inproductionandplanning
PPTX
Rccp report
PPTX
CAPACITY MANAGEMENT-GROUP CAPACITY REQUIRMENTS
PDF
Rough cut planning
PDF
Self Assessment 5 5.10
PPT
Mrpc final
PPTX
Module no 3 - Planning Functions.pptx
PPTX
S2019302018 m saqib nawaz mps
PPT
Manish 13 mrp2
PDF
RBC Portfolio Slides English
PPTX
Operation management of Dilla University business
PPTX
PDF
10 tips for chartering a project (v2)
DOC
White Paper On Engineering Pmf
PDF
Evolution of mrp type systems
PDF
10 tips for Chartering a Project
PPTX
SCM Chap 6mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.pptx
PPTX
UNIT-3 AGGREGATE PLANNING AND MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT.pptx
PDF
A roadmap to_success_in_capacity_management
PDF
A roadmap to_success_in_capacity_management
Reflections inproductionandplanning
Rccp report
CAPACITY MANAGEMENT-GROUP CAPACITY REQUIRMENTS
Rough cut planning
Self Assessment 5 5.10
Mrpc final
Module no 3 - Planning Functions.pptx
S2019302018 m saqib nawaz mps
Manish 13 mrp2
RBC Portfolio Slides English
Operation management of Dilla University business
10 tips for chartering a project (v2)
White Paper On Engineering Pmf
Evolution of mrp type systems
10 tips for Chartering a Project
SCM Chap 6mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.pptx
UNIT-3 AGGREGATE PLANNING AND MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT.pptx
A roadmap to_success_in_capacity_management
A roadmap to_success_in_capacity_management

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Improvisation in detection of pomegranate leaf disease using transfer learni...
PDF
Taming the Chaos: How to Turn Unstructured Data into Decisions
PDF
How ambidextrous entrepreneurial leaders react to the artificial intelligence...
PDF
Produktkatalog für HOBO Datenlogger, Wetterstationen, Sensoren, Software und ...
PDF
The influence of sentiment analysis in enhancing early warning system model f...
PPTX
2018-HIPAA-Renewal-Training for executives
PDF
A contest of sentiment analysis: k-nearest neighbor versus neural network
PDF
Developing a website for English-speaking practice to English as a foreign la...
PDF
Credit Without Borders: AI and Financial Inclusion in Bangladesh
PDF
How IoT Sensor Integration in 2025 is Transforming Industries Worldwide
PDF
Enhancing plagiarism detection using data pre-processing and machine learning...
PDF
A review of recent deep learning applications in wood surface defect identifi...
PPTX
Benefits of Physical activity for teenagers.pptx
PPTX
Configure Apache Mutual Authentication
PPTX
Modernising the Digital Integration Hub
PDF
Five Habits of High-Impact Board Members
PPTX
MicrosoftCybserSecurityReferenceArchitecture-April-2025.pptx
PPTX
Build Your First AI Agent with UiPath.pptx
PPT
Galois Field Theory of Risk: A Perspective, Protocol, and Mathematical Backgr...
PDF
Zenith AI: Advanced Artificial Intelligence
Improvisation in detection of pomegranate leaf disease using transfer learni...
Taming the Chaos: How to Turn Unstructured Data into Decisions
How ambidextrous entrepreneurial leaders react to the artificial intelligence...
Produktkatalog für HOBO Datenlogger, Wetterstationen, Sensoren, Software und ...
The influence of sentiment analysis in enhancing early warning system model f...
2018-HIPAA-Renewal-Training for executives
A contest of sentiment analysis: k-nearest neighbor versus neural network
Developing a website for English-speaking practice to English as a foreign la...
Credit Without Borders: AI and Financial Inclusion in Bangladesh
How IoT Sensor Integration in 2025 is Transforming Industries Worldwide
Enhancing plagiarism detection using data pre-processing and machine learning...
A review of recent deep learning applications in wood surface defect identifi...
Benefits of Physical activity for teenagers.pptx
Configure Apache Mutual Authentication
Modernising the Digital Integration Hub
Five Habits of High-Impact Board Members
MicrosoftCybserSecurityReferenceArchitecture-April-2025.pptx
Build Your First AI Agent with UiPath.pptx
Galois Field Theory of Risk: A Perspective, Protocol, and Mathematical Backgr...
Zenith AI: Advanced Artificial Intelligence

Master scheduling

  • 2. Introduction Products into product groups. They combine Which alltogether Aggregate Production Demand into reflect Top Management & Capacity Plans monthly totals. Decisions. Personnel Requirements across departments Eventually, the time comes when individual “end item” products and services must be scheduled at specific work centers. This is accomplished by master scheduling Which means, producing a SUPPLY PLAN (a time table including quantities) to produce specific items or provide specific services within a given time period.
  • 3. Master Schedule & the Master Production Schedule (MPS) The master schedule (MS) is a Example : A simple MS for an MPS item (end presentation of the demand, including product) the forecast and the backlog (customer orders received), the master production schedule (the supply plan), the projected on hand (POH) inventory, and the available-to-promise (ATP) quantity. The master production schedule (MPS) is the primary output of the master scheduling process.It is the “plan” for providing the supply to meet the demand. Table 1
  • 4. Relationship of Master Scheduling to other MPC activities Is the “key” in Creates demand Creates demand developing the requirements requirements master schedule The master schedule (MS) is a key link in the manufacturing planning and control chain. The MS interfaces with marketing, distribution planning, production planning, and capacity planning. The MS drives the material requirements planning (MRP) system. Master scheduling calculates the quantity required to meet demand Is the “key” requirements from all sources (see link Calculates net requirements the example case on next page). Input-Output Control & Operation Scheduling Figure 1
  • 5. Example : A case in which the distribution requirements are the gross requirements for the MS Here, the MS; enables marketing to make legitimate delivery commitments to field warehouses and final customers. enables production to evaluate capacity requirements in a more detailed manner. provides to management the opportunity to ascertain whether the business plan and its strategic objectives will be achieved. Table 2 Distribution Net Requirements are requirements (gross calculated by MRP logic. requirements for MS)
  • 6. Understanding THE ENVIRONMENT in which master scheduling takes place. Before describing the activities involved in creating and managing the MS, we need to examine the different organizational environments in which master scheduling takes place. THESE ENVIRONMENTS ARE DETERMINED BY the company’s STRATEGIC RESPONSES to; the INTERESTS of CUSTOMERS and the ACTIONS of COMPETITORS Thus, a COMPETETIVE STRATEGY evolves...
  • 7. The Role and Structure of Master Scheduling Master Scheduling is a business process designed to balance demand and supply at the detailed, mix level. Master Scheduling is primarily a decision-making process, performed by an individual called the Master Scheduler. As such, it is people- centered; the computer’s role is to support the people in their decision-making activities. The output from this process is the Master Production Schedule, which is the anticipated build schedule for specific products (or parts of products) and customer orders. The Master Schedule is: • time-phased, • extends for a number of weeks into the future, and • is typically expressed in weekly time increments or smaller.
  • 8. Inputs & outputs of master scheduling: Capacity Company Product Economic Consts. Policies Charact. Considerations Placed Orders Master Production Forecasted Demand Schedule: MPS When & How Much Current and Planned to produce for each Availability, eg., product •Initial Inventory, •Initiated Production, •Subcontracted quantities Planning Time Horizon unit Capacity Planning
  • 9. Rough-Cut Capacity Planning • RCCP checks whether critical resources are available to support the preliminary master production schedules. Critical resources include bottleneck operations, labor, and critical materials.
  • 10. MASTER PRODUCTION SCHEDULING PROCESS Figure 1 shows the master production scheduling process. Operations must first create a prospective MPS to test whether it meets the schedule with the resources(e.g., machine capacities, labor, overtime, and subcontractors) provided for in the aggregate production plan. Operations revises the MPS until it obtains a schedule that satisfies all resource limitations or determines that no feasible schedule can bedeveloped. In the latter event, the production plan must be revised to adjust production requirements or increase authorized resources. Once a feasible prospective MPShas been accepted by plant management, operations uses the authorized MPS as input to material requirements planning. Operations can then determine specific schedules for component production and assembly. Actual performance data such as inventory levels and shortages are inputs to the next prospective MPS, and the master production scheduling process is repeated.
  • 12. DEVELOPING A MASTER PRODUCTION SCHEDULE The process of developing a master production schedule includes (1) calculating the projected on-hand inventory (2) determining the timing and size of the production quantities of specific products Step 1. Calculate Projected On-Hand Inventories. The first step is to calculate the projected on-hand inventory, which is an estimate of the amount of inventory available each week after demand has been satisfied:
  • 13. In some weeks, there may be no MPS quantity for a product because sufficient inventory already exists. For the projected requirements for this week, the scheduler uses whichever is larger—the forecast or the customer orders booked—recognizing that the forecast is subject to error. If actual booked orders exceed the forecast, the projection will be more accurate if the scheduler uses the booked orders because booked orders are a known quantity. Conversely, if the forecast exceeds booked orders for a week, the forecast will provide a better estimate of requirements for that week because some orders are yet to come in.
  • 14. Example The manufacturer of the ladder-back chair produces the chair to stock and needs to develop an MPS for it. Marketing has forecasted a demand of 30 chairs for the first week of April, but actual customer orders booked are for 38 chairs. The current on-hand inventory is 55 chairs. No MPS quantity is due in week 1. Figure 2 shows an MPS record with these quantities listed. As actual orders for week 1 are greater than the forecast, the scheduler uses that figure for actual orders in calculating the projected inventory balance at the end of week 1:
  • 15. In week 2, the forecasted quantity exceeds actual orders booked, so the projected on-hand inventory for the end of week 2 is 17 + 0 - 30= -13. The shortage signals the need for more chairs in week 2.
  • 16. Step 2. Determine the Timing and Size of MPS Quantities. The goal of determining the timing and size of MPS quantities is to maintain a nonnegative projected on-hand inventory balance. As shortages in inventory are detected, MPS quantities should be scheduled to cover them, The first MPS quantity should be scheduled for the week when the projected on-hand inventory reflects a shortage, such as week 2 in Figure 2 The scheduler adds the MPS quantity to the projected on-hand inventory and searches for the next period when a shortage occurs. This shortage signals a need for a second MPS quantity, and so on. Figure 3 shows a master production schedule for the ladder-back chair for the next eight weeks. The order policy requires production lot sizes of 150 units. A shortage of 13 chairs in week 2 will occur unless the scheduler provides for an MPS quantity for that period.
  • 18. Once the MPS quantity is scheduled, the updated projected inventory balance for week 2 is The scheduler proceeds column by column through the MPS record until reaching the end, filling in the MPS quantities as needed to avoid shortages. The 137 units will satisfy forecasted demands until week 7, when the inventory shortage in the absence of an MPS quantity is 7 + 0 -35 =-28. This shortage signals the need for another MPS quantity of 150 units. The updated inventory balance is 7 + 150 - 35 = 122 chairs for week 7. The last row in Figure 3 indicates the periods in which production of the MPS quantities must begin so that they will be available when indicated in the MPS quantity row.
  • 19. a lead time of one week is indicated for the ladder-back chair; that is, one week is needed to assemble 150 ladder-back chairs, assuming that items B, C, D, and E are available. For each MPS quantity, the scheduler works backward through the lead time to determine when the assembly department must start producing chairs. Consequently, a lot of 150 units must be started in week 1 and another in week 6.
  • 20. AVAILABLE-TO-PROMISE QUANTITIES In addition to providing manufacturing with the timing and size of production quantities ,the MPS provides marketing with information that is useful in negotiating delivery dates with customers. The quantity of end items that marketing can promise to deliver on specified dates is called available-to-promise (ATP) inventory. It is the difference between the customer orders already booked and the quantity that operations is planning to produce. As new customer orders are accepted, the ATP inventory is reduced to reflect commitment of the firm to ship those quantities, but the actual inventory stays unchanged until the order is removed from inventory and shipped to the customer. An available-to-promise inventory is associated with each MPS quantity because the MPS quantity specifies the timing and size of new stock that can be earmarked to meet future bookings.
  • 21. Figure 4 shows an MPS record with an additional row for the available-to promise quantities. The ATP in week 2 is the MPS quantity minus booked customer orders until the next MPS quantity, or 150 - (27 + 24 + 8 + 0 + 0) = 91 units. The ATP indicates to marketing that, of the 150 units scheduled for completion in week 2, 91 units are uncommitted, and total new orders up to that quantity can be promised for delivery as early as week 2. In week 7, the ATP is 150 units because there are no booked orders in week 7 and beyond. The procedure for calculating available-to-promise information is slightly different for the first (current) week of the schedule than for other weeks because it accounts for the inventory currently in stock. The ATP inventory for the first week equals current on-hand inventory plus the MPS quantity for the first week, minus the cumulative total of booked orders up to (but not including) the week in which the next MPS quantity arrives. So, in Figure 4, the ATP for the first week is 55 + 0 - 38 = 17.
  • 23. This information indicates to the sales department that it can promise as many as 17 units this week, 91 more units sometime in weeks 2 through 6, and 150 more units in week 7 or 8. If customer order requests exceed ATP quantities in those time periods, the MPS must be changed before the customer orders can be booked or the customers must be given a later delivery date—when the next MPS quantity arrives. See the solved problem at the end of this supplement for an example of decision making using the ATP quantities. FREEZING THE MPS many firms, particularly those with a make-to-stock strategy and a focus on low-cost operations, freeze, or disallow changes to, a portion of the MPS. Freezing can be accomplished by specifying a demand time fence, which is the number of periods (beginning with the current period) during which few, if any, changescan be made to the MPS (i.e., the MPS is firm). Companies select the demand time fence after considering the costs of making changes to the MPS:
  • 24. Other time fences that allow varying amounts of change can be specified. For example, the planning time fence typically covers a longer period than the demand time fence.
  • 25. Example : The number of time fences can vary. Black & Decker uses three time fences: 8, 13, and 26 weeks. The 8-week fence is essentially a demand time fence. From 8 to 13 weeks, the MPS is quite rigid, but minor changes to model series may be made if components are available. From 13 to 26 weeks, substitution of one end item for another is permitted as long as the production plan is not violated and components are available. Beyond 26 weeks, marketing can make changes as long as they are compatible with the production plan.
  • 26. SOLVED PROBLEM The order policy is to produce end item A in lots of 50 units. Using the data shown in Figure 6 and the FOQ lot-sizing rule, complete the projected on-hand inventory and MPS quantity rows. Then complete the MPS start row by offsetting the MPS quantities for the final assembly lead time. Finally, compute the available-to-promise inventory for item A. If in week 1, a customer requests a new order for 30 units of item A, when is the earliest date the entire order could be shipped? The projected on-hand inventory for the second week is
  • 28. where requirements are the larger of the forecast or actual customer orders booked for shipment during this period. No MPS quantity is required. Without an MPS quantity in the third period, there will be a shortage of item A: 5 + 0 - 40 =- 35. Therefore, an MPS quantity equal to the lot size of 50 must be scheduled for completion in the third period. Then the projected on-hand inventory for the third week will be 5 + 50 - 40 = 15. Figure K.7 shows the projected on-hand inventories and MPS quantities from OM Explorer that would result from completing the MPS calculations. The MPS start row is completed by simply shifting a copy of the MPS quantity row to the left by one column to account for the one-week final assembly lead time. Also shown are the available-to-promise quantities. In week 1, the ATP is
  • 30. The ATP for the MPS quantity in week 3 is The other ATPs equal their respective MPS quantities because there are no booked orders for those weeks. As for the new order for 30 units, the earliest it can be shipped is week 3 because the ATP for week 1 is insufficient. If the customer accepts the delivery date of week 3, the ATP for week 1 will stay at 5 units and the ATP for week 3 will be reduced to 5 units. This acceptance allows the firm the flexibility to immediately satisfy an order for 5 units or less, if one comes in. The customer orders booked for week 3 would be increased to 35 to reflect the new order’s shipping date.