SlideShare a Scribd company logo
METU Department of
Mechanical Engineering
ME410
Experiment 1
Straightness and Flatness Measurements on a
Surface Table
Instructor Assoc. Prof. Dr. E. İlhan KONUKSEVEN
Assistant Cem Türkeş
Group D3
Team Samet Baykul
Hamza Arif Raza
Abdul Ahad Naeem
Prepared by
Samet Baykul
December 7, 2018
Measurement of Geometrical Errors in Manufacturing Flatness
ii
ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019
I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and
presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also
declare that, as require by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and
referenced all material and results that are not original to this work.
Name, Last Name : Samet Baykul
Signature :
1. Abstract
In this report, we will measure the straightness of line segments at certain intervals
and calculate the flatness of a surface through these measurements. We will discuss
how this measurement works. We will also discuss the results and possible errors.
2. Nomenclature
Surface Straightness: The standard form of straightness is a 2-D tolerance that is
used to ensure that a part is uniform across a surface or feature. It is defined as the
variance of the surface within a specified line on that surface.
Flatness references how flat a surface is regardless of any other datum’s or features.
(1)
Talyvel: Talyvel is a brand name for an instrument for setting horizontal lines. This
instrument consists of an induction transducer. A conductive pendulum is held between
the two halves of the induction transducer. So, whenever the instrument tilts the
pendulum also tilts giving rise to an electric impulse. This impulse can be measured by a
galvanometer and thus the amount of tilt can be known. (2)
3. Objective
• Learn to use Talyvel in order to measure the straightness of lines on a surface
table,
• To determine the flatness of the whole table from measurements,
• Discuss about important outcomes and possible errors.
2
ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019
4. Introduction
There are two feet of the device used in the measurement. We place these feet on
the correct order and read the value on the screen. There is a pendulum inside the device.
This pendulum works with gravity and gives an angle relative to the elevation difference
of the two feet. By using this angle, the difference between these points on the straight
line can be calculated.
5. Theory and Experimental Procedure
Accurately measuring the flatness of a surface allows us to test whether the product
is within the given tolerance values or not. Since an infinite number of lines pass through
a surface, an absolute flatness measurement is not possible at least by the method used
in this experiment. However, after measuring the straightness of a certain number of lines
distributed homogeneously on the surface, surface flatness can be calculated according
to these values effectively. This report shows how to do process and discuss possible
errors.
3
ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019
6. Data and Results
6.1. Surface Table
Measurements were done by using Talyvel on the determined surface. Each interval
is 150 mm.
4
ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019
6.2. Lines of Test
The results shown in seconds.
Position AC AE AG GC GE CE BF HD
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 21 10 65 35 -10 50 30 8
3 8 7 110 50 0 100 70 0
4 -6 14 - 65 -14 - - -19
5 - 16 - 75 - - - -
These results were transformed into height difference with formula (7.1).
Position AC AE AG GC GE CE BF HD
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 15.3 7.3 47.3 25.4 -7.3 36.4 21.8 5.8
3 5.8 5.1 80.0 36.4 0 72.7 50.9 0
4 -4,4 10.2 - 47.3 -10.2 - - -13.8
5 - 11.6 - 54.5 - - - -
5
ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019
6.3. Correction of Data
6.3.1. AC Line
Cumulative Error Correction Height Relative to ACG
0 0 0
0 +1.5 1.5
21 +3.0 24
8 +4.5 12.5
-6 +6.0 0
6.3.2. AG Line
Cumulative Error Correction Height Relative to ACG
0 0 0
0 -36.7 -36.7
65 -73.3 -8.3
110 -110.0 0
6.3.3. GC Line
Cumulative Error Correction Height Relative to ACG
0 0 0
0 -15.0 -15
35 -30.0 5
(42.5 midpoint) -37.5 5
50 -45.0 5
65 -60.0 5
75 -75.0 0
6
ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019
6.3.4. AE Line
Cumulative Error Correction Height Relative to ACG
0 0 0
0 -1.7 -1.7
10 -2.3 7.7
(8.5 midpoint) (-3.5) 5
7 -4.7 2.3
14 -5.8 8.2
16 -7.0 9
6.3.5. CE Line
Cumulative Error Correction Height Relative to ACG
0 0 0
0 -30.3 -30.3
50 -60.7 -60.7
100 -91.0 9
6.3.6. GE Line
Cumulative Error Correction Height Relative to ACG
0 0 0
0 +5.8 5.8
-10 +11.5 -1.5
0 +17.2 17.2
-14 +23.0 9
7
ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019
6.3.7. BF Line
Cumulative Error Initial Correction Correction Error to ACG
0 24 0 24
0 24 -31.8 -7.8
(15 midpoint) 39 (-47.8 midpoint) -8.8 (It should
be close to 5)
30 54 -63.7 -9.7
70 94 -95.5 -1.5
6.3.8. HD Line
Cumulative Error Initial Correction Correction Error to ACG
0 -22.5 0 -22.5
0 -22.5 -0.9 -23.4
8 -14.5 -1.8 -16.3 (It should
be close to 5)
0 -22.5 -2.8 -25.3
-19 -41 -3.7 -45.5
8
ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019
6.3.9. Results
These results are given as angle values in seconds. These values can be easily
converted to micrometer using formula 7.1.
0 +1.5 +24 +12.5 0
0
-8.3
-36.7
-15
+5.8 -1.5 +17.2 +9
-60.7
-30.3
-45.5-22.5
+5
+7.7
-1.7
+2.3
+8.3
+5
+5
+5
9
ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019
7. Sample Calculations with Uncertainty Analysis
7.1. Converting from Angular Rotation to Linear Rise or Fall
h(in µm) = p*150*1000/(3600*180)*q(in seconds)
For 21 seconds ->
h = p*150*1000/(3600*180)*21
h = 15.27 µm
10
ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019
8. Discussion and Conclusion
• The results are consistent within themselves except for a few points. Middle
points on BF and HD lines contradicts with some previous points as shown on
the tables.
• There are multiple errors caused by measurement.
o The biggest error source is the feet on which the device is placed do
not proceed on a straight line.
o Again, the roughness of the surface area below the feet on which the
device is placed may cause the device to lie in a different way than it
should.
Nowadays, surface flatness measurement can be done with better modern methods.
However, it is important to learn the basics of this measurement and to be aware of
possible sources of errors.
11
ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019
References
(1) (n.d.), https://www.gdandtbasics.com/straightness/
(2) (11 May, 2018), https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Talyvel
12
ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019
Appendices
A.1. Principles of “Talyvel” Electronic Level
Source: (11 May, 2018), https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Talyvel
13
ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019
A.2. Surface Flatness and Flatness Tolerance Representation
Source: (n.d.), https://www.gdandtbasics.com/straightness/

More Related Content

PPTX
L8 Applied mechanical measurement
PPTX
3. v belt and sample problem
PDF
Solution manual !!! by rao-mechanical-vibrations-4th ed
PPT
Turning fixtures
PDF
Unit 5 threaded joint
PPTX
Interchangeability & selective assembly
PPTX
CNC part programming
PPTX
Rivet joints, methods of riveting, types
L8 Applied mechanical measurement
3. v belt and sample problem
Solution manual !!! by rao-mechanical-vibrations-4th ed
Turning fixtures
Unit 5 threaded joint
Interchangeability & selective assembly
CNC part programming
Rivet joints, methods of riveting, types

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Press work operations(Metal Sheet Operations)
PPTX
1 b. Machine design - Prefered numbers, asthetic and ergonomic design
PDF
DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF A POWER SCISSOR JACK
PPTX
Jigs & fixtures
PPT
sheet metal working
PDF
Unit 3 design against fluctuation load
PDF
Springs - DESIGN OF MACHINE ELEMENTS-II
PPTX
Rp Rapid prototyping
PDF
Torsion test machine design
PPTX
Machine elements
PPTX
SLIP GUAGE
PDF
Jig and fixture
PDF
CE6451 - FLUID MECHANICS AND MACHINERY UNIT - IV NOTES
PPTX
Tool presetting
PDF
Drill jig
PPTX
Finite element analysis
PPTX
Clamp or compression coupling
PPT
Metrology and Measurements unit 2
PPTX
22564 emd 2.1 cotter joint numerical
PPTX
Stress concentration
Press work operations(Metal Sheet Operations)
1 b. Machine design - Prefered numbers, asthetic and ergonomic design
DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF A POWER SCISSOR JACK
Jigs & fixtures
sheet metal working
Unit 3 design against fluctuation load
Springs - DESIGN OF MACHINE ELEMENTS-II
Rp Rapid prototyping
Torsion test machine design
Machine elements
SLIP GUAGE
Jig and fixture
CE6451 - FLUID MECHANICS AND MACHINERY UNIT - IV NOTES
Tool presetting
Drill jig
Finite element analysis
Clamp or compression coupling
Metrology and Measurements unit 2
22564 emd 2.1 cotter joint numerical
Stress concentration
Ad

Similar to Measurement of Geometrical Errors in Manufacturing Flatness (20)

PDF
Ge 105 lecture 1 (LEAST SQUARES ADJUSTMENT) by: Broddett B. Abatayo
DOCX
1. Practical assessment-Carry out levelling operations
PDF
IRJET- Behavior of Beam Column Joint in RCC Frames Subjected to Lateral Loading
PPT
EMM- Mech Comparator.ppt
DOCX
Practical assessment 1-Carry out levelling operations
PDF
jurnal (inggris)
PDF
IRJET- Parametric Optimization of Co2 Welding on Fe410 using Taguchi Tech...
PDF
IRJET- Mathematical Analysis of Performance of a Vibratory Bowl Feeder for Fe...
PDF
Sliding mode control-based system for the two-link robot arm
PDF
Nonlinear static simulation of automotive bumper of a passenger car in low sp...
PDF
Experimental and numerical stress analysis of a rectangular wing structure
PDF
IRJET- Experimental Parametric Study of Diagrid Structure under Seismic Forces
DOC
Site Surveying Report 1 (Levelling)
PDF
C1302031319
PDF
Effectiveness of Element Free Galerkin Method over FEM
PDF
Research on a Kind of PLC Based Fuzzy-PID Controller with Adjustable Factor
PDF
IRJET- Optimum Design of Fan, Queen and Pratt Trusses
PDF
Comparators, Surface Flatness, Surface Roughness,
PDF
Ieeepro techno solutions 2013 ieee embedded project study of the accuracy r...
PDF
Multi Response Optimization of Friction Stir Lap Welding Process Parameters U...
Ge 105 lecture 1 (LEAST SQUARES ADJUSTMENT) by: Broddett B. Abatayo
1. Practical assessment-Carry out levelling operations
IRJET- Behavior of Beam Column Joint in RCC Frames Subjected to Lateral Loading
EMM- Mech Comparator.ppt
Practical assessment 1-Carry out levelling operations
jurnal (inggris)
IRJET- Parametric Optimization of Co2 Welding on Fe410 using Taguchi Tech...
IRJET- Mathematical Analysis of Performance of a Vibratory Bowl Feeder for Fe...
Sliding mode control-based system for the two-link robot arm
Nonlinear static simulation of automotive bumper of a passenger car in low sp...
Experimental and numerical stress analysis of a rectangular wing structure
IRJET- Experimental Parametric Study of Diagrid Structure under Seismic Forces
Site Surveying Report 1 (Levelling)
C1302031319
Effectiveness of Element Free Galerkin Method over FEM
Research on a Kind of PLC Based Fuzzy-PID Controller with Adjustable Factor
IRJET- Optimum Design of Fan, Queen and Pratt Trusses
Comparators, Surface Flatness, Surface Roughness,
Ieeepro techno solutions 2013 ieee embedded project study of the accuracy r...
Multi Response Optimization of Friction Stir Lap Welding Process Parameters U...
Ad

More from Samet Baykul (19)

PDF
2019.11.17 - Mobil Oyun Analizi - Twisty Road
PDF
2019.11.16 - Mobil Oyun Analizi - Tomb of the Mask
PDF
2019.11.16 - Mobil Oyun Analizi - Amaze
PDF
2019.11.15 - Mobil Oyun Analizi - Aquapark.io
PDF
Emek R&D - Summer Practice Report
PDF
Introduction to Magnetic Refrigeration
PDF
Vortex Tube Usage in Cooling and Liquification Process of Excess Gases in Ghe...
PDF
MHead - Self-Organized Flocking in Mobile Robot Swarms
PDF
Gearbox Design and Bearing Selection
PDF
Design of a Lift Mechanism for Disabled People
PDF
Creating Comfortable Air Conditions in Mars for a Sample Volume Shelter
PDF
Solvent Recovery System - Feasibility Report
PDF
Note Elevator - Summer Practice Report
PDF
Design of a Stabilizing Handle for Parkinson’s Disease Patients - 2
PDF
Design of a Stabilizing Handle for Parkinson’s Disease Patients - 1
PDF
Introduction to Magnetic Refrigeration
PDF
Refrigerants and Their Environmental Impact
PDF
Convective Heat Transfer Measurements at the Martian Surface
PDF
Levels of Automation
2019.11.17 - Mobil Oyun Analizi - Twisty Road
2019.11.16 - Mobil Oyun Analizi - Tomb of the Mask
2019.11.16 - Mobil Oyun Analizi - Amaze
2019.11.15 - Mobil Oyun Analizi - Aquapark.io
Emek R&D - Summer Practice Report
Introduction to Magnetic Refrigeration
Vortex Tube Usage in Cooling and Liquification Process of Excess Gases in Ghe...
MHead - Self-Organized Flocking in Mobile Robot Swarms
Gearbox Design and Bearing Selection
Design of a Lift Mechanism for Disabled People
Creating Comfortable Air Conditions in Mars for a Sample Volume Shelter
Solvent Recovery System - Feasibility Report
Note Elevator - Summer Practice Report
Design of a Stabilizing Handle for Parkinson’s Disease Patients - 2
Design of a Stabilizing Handle for Parkinson’s Disease Patients - 1
Introduction to Magnetic Refrigeration
Refrigerants and Their Environmental Impact
Convective Heat Transfer Measurements at the Martian Surface
Levels of Automation

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
additive manufacturing of ss316l using mig welding
DOCX
573137875-Attendance-Management-System-original
DOCX
ASol_English-Language-Literature-Set-1-27-02-2023-converted.docx
PDF
SM_6th-Sem__Cse_Internet-of-Things.pdf IOT
PPTX
Internet of Things (IOT) - A guide to understanding
PDF
PPT on Performance Review to get promotions
PPTX
M Tech Sem 1 Civil Engineering Environmental Sciences.pptx
PDF
R24 SURVEYING LAB MANUAL for civil enggi
PDF
Human-AI Collaboration: Balancing Agentic AI and Autonomy in Hybrid Systems
PDF
III.4.1.2_The_Space_Environment.p pdffdf
PDF
Mitigating Risks through Effective Management for Enhancing Organizational Pe...
PDF
Well-logging-methods_new................
PDF
composite construction of structures.pdf
PPT
Project quality management in manufacturing
PPTX
Sustainable Sites - Green Building Construction
PPTX
Construction Project Organization Group 2.pptx
PDF
Model Code of Practice - Construction Work - 21102022 .pdf
PPTX
Engineering Ethics, Safety and Environment [Autosaved] (1).pptx
PPTX
bas. eng. economics group 4 presentation 1.pptx
PDF
BMEC211 - INTRODUCTION TO MECHATRONICS-1.pdf
additive manufacturing of ss316l using mig welding
573137875-Attendance-Management-System-original
ASol_English-Language-Literature-Set-1-27-02-2023-converted.docx
SM_6th-Sem__Cse_Internet-of-Things.pdf IOT
Internet of Things (IOT) - A guide to understanding
PPT on Performance Review to get promotions
M Tech Sem 1 Civil Engineering Environmental Sciences.pptx
R24 SURVEYING LAB MANUAL for civil enggi
Human-AI Collaboration: Balancing Agentic AI and Autonomy in Hybrid Systems
III.4.1.2_The_Space_Environment.p pdffdf
Mitigating Risks through Effective Management for Enhancing Organizational Pe...
Well-logging-methods_new................
composite construction of structures.pdf
Project quality management in manufacturing
Sustainable Sites - Green Building Construction
Construction Project Organization Group 2.pptx
Model Code of Practice - Construction Work - 21102022 .pdf
Engineering Ethics, Safety and Environment [Autosaved] (1).pptx
bas. eng. economics group 4 presentation 1.pptx
BMEC211 - INTRODUCTION TO MECHATRONICS-1.pdf

Measurement of Geometrical Errors in Manufacturing Flatness

  • 1. METU Department of Mechanical Engineering ME410 Experiment 1 Straightness and Flatness Measurements on a Surface Table Instructor Assoc. Prof. Dr. E. İlhan KONUKSEVEN Assistant Cem Türkeş Group D3 Team Samet Baykul Hamza Arif Raza Abdul Ahad Naeem Prepared by Samet Baykul December 7, 2018
  • 3. ii ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019 I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as require by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name : Samet Baykul Signature :
  • 4. 1. Abstract In this report, we will measure the straightness of line segments at certain intervals and calculate the flatness of a surface through these measurements. We will discuss how this measurement works. We will also discuss the results and possible errors. 2. Nomenclature Surface Straightness: The standard form of straightness is a 2-D tolerance that is used to ensure that a part is uniform across a surface or feature. It is defined as the variance of the surface within a specified line on that surface. Flatness references how flat a surface is regardless of any other datum’s or features. (1) Talyvel: Talyvel is a brand name for an instrument for setting horizontal lines. This instrument consists of an induction transducer. A conductive pendulum is held between the two halves of the induction transducer. So, whenever the instrument tilts the pendulum also tilts giving rise to an electric impulse. This impulse can be measured by a galvanometer and thus the amount of tilt can be known. (2) 3. Objective • Learn to use Talyvel in order to measure the straightness of lines on a surface table, • To determine the flatness of the whole table from measurements, • Discuss about important outcomes and possible errors.
  • 5. 2 ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019 4. Introduction There are two feet of the device used in the measurement. We place these feet on the correct order and read the value on the screen. There is a pendulum inside the device. This pendulum works with gravity and gives an angle relative to the elevation difference of the two feet. By using this angle, the difference between these points on the straight line can be calculated. 5. Theory and Experimental Procedure Accurately measuring the flatness of a surface allows us to test whether the product is within the given tolerance values or not. Since an infinite number of lines pass through a surface, an absolute flatness measurement is not possible at least by the method used in this experiment. However, after measuring the straightness of a certain number of lines distributed homogeneously on the surface, surface flatness can be calculated according to these values effectively. This report shows how to do process and discuss possible errors.
  • 6. 3 ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019 6. Data and Results 6.1. Surface Table Measurements were done by using Talyvel on the determined surface. Each interval is 150 mm.
  • 7. 4 ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019 6.2. Lines of Test The results shown in seconds. Position AC AE AG GC GE CE BF HD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 21 10 65 35 -10 50 30 8 3 8 7 110 50 0 100 70 0 4 -6 14 - 65 -14 - - -19 5 - 16 - 75 - - - - These results were transformed into height difference with formula (7.1). Position AC AE AG GC GE CE BF HD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 15.3 7.3 47.3 25.4 -7.3 36.4 21.8 5.8 3 5.8 5.1 80.0 36.4 0 72.7 50.9 0 4 -4,4 10.2 - 47.3 -10.2 - - -13.8 5 - 11.6 - 54.5 - - - -
  • 8. 5 ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019 6.3. Correction of Data 6.3.1. AC Line Cumulative Error Correction Height Relative to ACG 0 0 0 0 +1.5 1.5 21 +3.0 24 8 +4.5 12.5 -6 +6.0 0 6.3.2. AG Line Cumulative Error Correction Height Relative to ACG 0 0 0 0 -36.7 -36.7 65 -73.3 -8.3 110 -110.0 0 6.3.3. GC Line Cumulative Error Correction Height Relative to ACG 0 0 0 0 -15.0 -15 35 -30.0 5 (42.5 midpoint) -37.5 5 50 -45.0 5 65 -60.0 5 75 -75.0 0
  • 9. 6 ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019 6.3.4. AE Line Cumulative Error Correction Height Relative to ACG 0 0 0 0 -1.7 -1.7 10 -2.3 7.7 (8.5 midpoint) (-3.5) 5 7 -4.7 2.3 14 -5.8 8.2 16 -7.0 9 6.3.5. CE Line Cumulative Error Correction Height Relative to ACG 0 0 0 0 -30.3 -30.3 50 -60.7 -60.7 100 -91.0 9 6.3.6. GE Line Cumulative Error Correction Height Relative to ACG 0 0 0 0 +5.8 5.8 -10 +11.5 -1.5 0 +17.2 17.2 -14 +23.0 9
  • 10. 7 ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019 6.3.7. BF Line Cumulative Error Initial Correction Correction Error to ACG 0 24 0 24 0 24 -31.8 -7.8 (15 midpoint) 39 (-47.8 midpoint) -8.8 (It should be close to 5) 30 54 -63.7 -9.7 70 94 -95.5 -1.5 6.3.8. HD Line Cumulative Error Initial Correction Correction Error to ACG 0 -22.5 0 -22.5 0 -22.5 -0.9 -23.4 8 -14.5 -1.8 -16.3 (It should be close to 5) 0 -22.5 -2.8 -25.3 -19 -41 -3.7 -45.5
  • 11. 8 ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019 6.3.9. Results These results are given as angle values in seconds. These values can be easily converted to micrometer using formula 7.1. 0 +1.5 +24 +12.5 0 0 -8.3 -36.7 -15 +5.8 -1.5 +17.2 +9 -60.7 -30.3 -45.5-22.5 +5 +7.7 -1.7 +2.3 +8.3 +5 +5 +5
  • 12. 9 ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019 7. Sample Calculations with Uncertainty Analysis 7.1. Converting from Angular Rotation to Linear Rise or Fall h(in µm) = p*150*1000/(3600*180)*q(in seconds) For 21 seconds -> h = p*150*1000/(3600*180)*21 h = 15.27 µm
  • 13. 10 ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019 8. Discussion and Conclusion • The results are consistent within themselves except for a few points. Middle points on BF and HD lines contradicts with some previous points as shown on the tables. • There are multiple errors caused by measurement. o The biggest error source is the feet on which the device is placed do not proceed on a straight line. o Again, the roughness of the surface area below the feet on which the device is placed may cause the device to lie in a different way than it should. Nowadays, surface flatness measurement can be done with better modern methods. However, it is important to learn the basics of this measurement and to be aware of possible sources of errors.
  • 14. 11 ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019 References (1) (n.d.), https://www.gdandtbasics.com/straightness/ (2) (11 May, 2018), https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Talyvel
  • 15. 12 ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019 Appendices A.1. Principles of “Talyvel” Electronic Level Source: (11 May, 2018), https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Talyvel
  • 16. 13 ME 410 Experiment 1 August 1, 2019 A.2. Surface Flatness and Flatness Tolerance Representation Source: (n.d.), https://www.gdandtbasics.com/straightness/