Methods of weed control

METHODS OF WEED CONTROL
Prepared By: Dr Pooja Goswami
Assistant Professor (Agronomy)
College of Agriculture, Balaghat

Methods of Weed Control
Weed control methods are grouped into cultural, physical, chemical and biological. Every
method of weed control has its own advantages and disadvantages. No single method is successful under
all weed situations. Many a time, a combination of these methods gives effective and economic control than
a single method.
(A) CULTURAL WEED CONTROL
Several cultural practices like tillage, planting, fertiliser application, irrigation etc., are
employed for creating favourable condition for the crop. These practices if used properly, help in controlling
weeds. Cultural methods, alone cannot control weeds, but help in reducing weed population. They should,
therefore, be used in combination with other methods. In cultural methods, tillage, fertiliser application. and
irrigation are important. In addition, aspects like selection of variety, time of sowing, cropping system,
cleanliness of the farm etc., are also useful in controlling weeds.
1. Field preparation
The field has to be kept weed free. Flowering of weeds should not be allowed.
This helps in prevention of build up of weed seed population.
2. Summer tillage
The practice of summer tillage or off-season tillage is one of the effective cultural
methods to check the growth of perennial weed population in crop cultivation. Initial
tillage before cropping should encourage clod formation. These clods, which have the
weed

propagules, upon drying desiccate the same. Subsequent tillage operations should
break the clods into small units to further expose the shriveled weeds to the hot sun.
3. Maintenance of optimum plant population
Lack of adequate plant population is prone to heavy weed infestation, which
becomes, difficult to control later. Therefore practices like selection of proper seed,
right method of sowing, adequate seed rate protection of seed from soil borne pests and
diseases etc. are very important to obtain proper and uniform crop stand capable of
offering competition to the weeds.
4. Crop rotation
The possibility of a certain weed species or group of species occurring is greater
if the same crop is grown year after year. In many instances, crop rotation can eliminate
atleast reduce difficult weed problems. The obnoxious weeds like Cyperus rotundus can
be controlled effectively by including low land rice in crop rotation.
5. Growing of intercrops
Inter cropping suppresses weeds better than sole cropping and thus provides an
opportunity to utilize crops themselves as tools of weed management. Many short
duration pulses viz., green gram and soybean effectively smother weeds without
causing reduction in the yield of main crop.
6. Mulching
Mulch is a protective covering of material maintained on soil surface. Mulching
has smothering effect on weed control by excluding light from the photosynthetic
portions of a plant and thus inhibiting the top growth. It is very effective against annual
weeds and some perennial weeds like Cynodon dactylon. Mulching is done by dry or
green crop residues, plastic sheet or polythene film. To be effective the mulch should be
thick enough to prevent light transmission and eliminate photosynthesis.

7. Solarisation
This is another method of utilisation of solar energy for the desiccation of weeds.
In this method, the soil temperature is further raised by 5 – 10 ºC by covering a pre-
soaked fallow field with thin transparent plastic sheet. The plastic sheet checks the long
wave back radiation from the soil and prevents loss of energy by hindering moisture
evaporation.
8. Stale seedbed
A stale seedbed is one where initial one or two flushes of weeds are destroyed
before planting of a crop. This is achieved by soaking a well prepared field with either
irrigation or rain and allowing the weeds to germinate. At this stage a shallow tillage or
non- residual herbicide like paraquat may be used to destroy the dense flush of young
weed seedlings. This may be followed immediately by sowing. This technique allows the
crop to germinate in almost weed- free environment.
9. Blind tillage
The tillage of the soil after sowing a crop before the crop plants emerge is known
as blind tillage. It is extensively employed to minimise weed intensity in drill sowing
crops where emergence of crop seedling is hindered by soil crust formed on receipt of
rain or irrigation immediately after sowing.

10. Crop management practices
Good crop management practices that play an important role in weed control are
a. Vigorous andfastgrowingcropvarieties are bettercompetitors withweeds.
b. Proper placement of fertilizers ensures greater availability of nutrients to crop plants,thus
keepingthe weeds ata disadvantage.
c. Betterirrigationpractices tohave agoodheadstart overthe weeds
d. Propercroprotation programme
e. Higherplantpopulation perunitarearesultsinsmotheringeffect onweedgrowth
Merits of Cultural Method
1. Low cost for weedcontrol
2. Easy to adopt
3. Noresidual Problem
4. Technical skill isnotinvolved
5. Nodamage to crops
6. Effective weedcontrol
7. Crop-weed ecosystemismaintained
Demerits of Cultural Method
1. Immediate andquick weedcontrol isnotpossible
2. Weeds are keptundersuppressed condition
3. Perennialandproblematicweeds cannotbe controlled
4. Practical difficulty inadoption
(B)MECHANICAL WEED CONTROL
Mechanical or physical methods of weed control are being employed ever since
man began to grow crops. The mechanical methods include tillage, hoeing, hand
weeding, digging cheeling, sickling, mowing, burning, flooding, mulching etc.
1. Tillage
Tillage removes weeds from the soil resulting
in their death. It may weaken plants through injury of
root and stem pruning, reducing their competitiveness
or regenerative capacity. Tillage also buries weeds.
Tillage operation includes ploughing, discing,
harrowing and leveling which is used to promote the
germination of weeds through soil turnover and

exposure of seeds tosunlight, which can be destroyed
effectively later. In case of perennials, both top and
underground growth is injured and destroyed by
tillage.
2. Hoeing
Hoe has been the most appropriate and widely used weeding tool for centuries. It
is however, still a very useful implement to obtain results effectively and cheaply. It
supplements the cultivator in row crops. Hoeing is particularly more effective on annuals
and biennials as weed growth can be completely destroyed. In case of perennials, it
destroyed the top growth with little effect on underground plant parts resulting in re-
growth.

3. Hand weeding
It is done by physical removal or pulling out of weeds by hand or removal by
implements called khurpi, which resembles sickle. It is probably the oldest method of
controlling weeds and it is still a practical and efficient method of eliminating weeds in
cropped and non-cropped lands. It is very effective against annuals, biennials and
controls only upper portions of perennials.
4. Digging
Digging is very useful in the case of perennial weeds to remove the underground
propagating parts of weeds from the deeper layer of the soil.
5. Sickling and mowing
Sickling is also done by hand with the help of sickle to remove the top growth of

weeds to prevent seed production and to starve the underground parts. It is popular in
sloppy areas where only the tall weed growth is sickled leaving the root system to
hold the soil in place to prevent soil erosion. Mowing is a machine-operated practice
mostly done on roadsides and in lawns.
6. Burning
Burning or fire is often an economical and practical means of controlling weeds.
It is used to (a) dispose of vegetation (b) destroy dry tops of weeds that have matured
(c) kill green weed growth in situations where cultivations and other common methods
are impracticable.
8. Flooding
Flooding is successful against weed species sensitive to longer periods of
submergence in water. Flooding kills plants by reducing oxygen availability for plant
growth. The success of flooding depends upon complete submergence of weeds for
longer periods.
Merits of Mechanical Method

1) Oldest, effective and economical method
2) Large area can be covered in shorter time
3) Safe method for environment
4) Does not involve any skill
5) Weedingispossible inbetweenplants
6) Deeprootedweeds canbe controlled effectively
Demerits of Mechanical Method
1) Labour consuming
2) Possibility of damagingcrop
3) Requires idealandoptimumspecificcondition
Mechanical
weedersDry Land
Weeder
It is used for weeding in row crops for removing shallow rooted weeds. It has
been designed ergonomically for easy operation. Useful in dryland and gardenland
crops and is ideal at a soil moisture content of 8 to 10 per cent.
At the extreme end of the arm 120 mm diameter star wheel is fixed. A cutting
blade is fitted to the arm 200mm to the back of the star wheel the star wheel facilitates
easy movementof the tool. The operating width of the blade is 120 mm. Ideal to remove
shallow rooted weeds. The workable moisture content has to be 8 to 10 %
Power rotary weeder

 For mechanical control of weeds in crops such as sugarcane, tapioca, cotton, tomato and pulses
whose rows spacing is more than 45 cm.
The rotary weeder consists of three rows of discs mounted with 6 numbers of
curved blades in opposite directions alternatively in each disc. These blades when
rotating enable cutting and mulching the soil. The width of coverage of the rotary tiller is
500 mm and the depth of operation can be adjusted to weed and mulch the soil in the
cropped field.
Tractor drawn weeding cum earthing up equipment
 For weedingand interculturaloperations inbetweenrow cropsinasingle pass
An inter cultivator cum earthing up equipment was developed and fitted to a
standard tractor drawn ridger. Three number of sweep type blades are affixed to
the ridger frame for accomplishing the weeding operation in between standing rows of
crops. Three ridger bottom fitted behind the sweep blade, work on the loosened soil
mass and aid in earthing up by forming ridges and furrows. Weeding efficiency is 61 per
cent.
Tractor operated multi row rotary weeder
 For weeding and intercultural operations in between row crops like sugarcane, cotton, maize,
etc. in a single pass

The multi row rotary weeder consists of a set of cutting blades, which penetrate
in to the soil, removing the weeds in the crop rows. The cutting blade has also been
used as an inclined plane for elevating and converging the soil. The rotating blades are
used to cut the weeds and pulverizing the soil. Weeding efficiency is 71 per cent.
Cono weeder
 For weedingbetween rowsof paddy crop
The cono weeder has two conical rotors mounted in tandem with opposite
orientation. Smooth and serrated blades mounted alternately on the rotor uproot and
burry weeds because the rotors create a back and forth movement in the top 3 cm of
soil, the cono weeder can satisfactorily weed in a single forward pass without a push
pull movement. It is easy to operate by a single operator. The weeder does not sink in
puddled soil. Field capacity 0.18 ha/day. Star,Peg type and Twin hoe wheel weeding.


(A) Herbicidal control of weeds
Herbicides are chemicals capable of killing or inhibiting the growth of plants.
In the last 40 years or so, man has greatly improved upon his weeding efficiency by
supplementing the conventional weeding methods with herbicides. It has saved
farmers of undue, repeated inter-cultivations and hoeing, and has helped him in
obtaining satisfactory weed control where physical methods often fail. Today, we
have over 150 herbicides in common use for selective and non-selective weed
control in different areas. These chemicals vary greatly in their (a) molecular
structures, (b) mobility within plants, (c) selectivity, (d) fate in soils, and (e) response
to environment
Benefits of Herbicides:
1. In monsoon season incessant rainfall may make physical weeding infeasible.
Herbicides can be used to ensure freedom of crops from weeds under such a
condition. Also, during the early crop growth period when many fields need weeding
simultaneously, even in labour-rich countries like India, Pakistan, Bangladeshi Nepal,
Nigeria, and Sudan, there is certainly a weeding bottleneck in crop production. The soil
applied herbicides can be of great help in these regions in boosting crop production.
2. Herbicides can be employed to control weeds as they emerge from the soil to
eliminate weed- crop interference even at a very early stage of crop growth. But by
physical methods weeds are removed after they have offered considerable
competition to the crops, and rarely at the critical time. Thus, herbicides provide
benefits of timely weed control.
3. Herbicides can kill many weeds that survive by mimicry, for example, wildoat (Avena
spp.) in wheat and barnyard grass (Echinochloa spp.) in rice. Weeds that resemble crop
plants usually escape physical weeding.
4. Herbicidal control does not dictate strict row spacing. In physical weed control, on the
other hand the crop rows have to be sufficiently wide to accommodate weeding
implements, else hand weeding and hand-pulling of weeds has to be resorted to.
5. Herbicides bring about longer lasting control of perennial weeds and brushes than is
possible with any physical control method. Many modern herbicides can translocate
considerably deep in the underground system of weeds and damage them.
6. Herbicides are convenient to use on spiny weeds which cannot be reached manually.
7. Herbicides are safe on erodable lands where tillage may accelerate soil and water
erosion. Excessive tillage, in any case, spoils soil structure, reduces organic matter
content, and depletes moisture status of the soil.
8. Herbicides kill weeds in situ without permitting their dissemination. Tillage on the
other hand, may fragment the vegetative propagules of the weeds and drag them to
new sites.
9. Herbicide sprays easily reach the weeds growing in obstructed situations, such as
utility-rights-of-way, under fruit trees, and on undulating lands.
Some other benefits of using herbicides include (a) fewer labour problems, (b)
greater possibility of farm mechanization, (c) easier crop harvesting and (d) lower
cost of farm produce. In dry land agriculture, effective herbicidal control ensures
higher water use by crops and less crop failures due to drought.
Limitations of Herbicides:

Like any other method of weed control, herbicides have their own limitations.
But with proper precautions these limitations can be overcome, markedly. Important
limitations in the use of herbicides are as follows.
1. In herbicidal control there is no automatic signal to stop a farmer who- may be
applying the chemical inaccurately till he sees the results in the crops sprayedor in
the rotation crops that follow.
2. Even when herbicides are applied accurately, these may interact with environment
to produce unintended results. Herbicide drifts, wash-off, and runoff can cause
considerable damage to the neighboring crops, leading to unwarranted quarrels.
3. Depending upon the diversity in faming, a variety of herbicides must bestocked on a
farm to control weeds in different fields. On the contrary, for physical control of
weeds a farmer has to possess only one or two kinds of weeding implements for his
entire farm.
4. Above all, herbicidal control requires considerable skill on the part of theuser. He
must be able to identify his weeds and possess considerable
knowledge about herbicides and their proper usages. Sometimes, an error inthe
use of herbicides can be very costly.
5. In herbicide treated soils, usually crop failures cannot be made up by planting a
different crop of choice. The selection of the replacement crop has to be based
on its tolerance to the herbicide already applied.
6. Military use of herbicides is the greatest misfortune of their discovery. In Vietnam, 2,
4, D and 2, 4, 5-T, for example, was used for defoliating forests and crops,
leading to miseries to the innocent civilians. In future, the chemical warfare with
residual herbicides may be even more devastating,which must be avoided at all costs
(B) BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF WEEDS
Definition: - The biological control of weeds involves the use of living organisms.
Such as insect, herbivorous fish, other animals, disease organisms, and competitive
plants to limit their infestations.
An important aspect of biological weed control is that at a time, it is applicable
to the control of only one major weed species that has spread widely. With perennial
weeds the main objective of bio-control is the destruction of the existing vegetation,
in the case of annual weeds prevention of their seed production is generally more
important.
Criteria of Successful Bio agent:-
A successful bio agent is (i) host specific, (ii) adjustable to the new
environment, (iii) rapid destroyer of the target weed, (iv) easy to multiply, and (v)
effective on several texa of the weed in question.
(i) Host Specificity: - Bio control agents recommended for weed control should be host-
specific, i.e. they should not attack other plant species, particularly the economic ones. The
bio-agents released so far (chiefly insects) had successfully passed the ‘starvation tests’
before they left the laboratories for field use. They were found to prefer to starve to death
rather than feed upon plant species other than the target weed. Starvation test is a good
safeguard against an introduced bio-agent becoming a pest on some economic crop plant.
(ii) Bio agent Hardiness: It is important that a classical bio agent withstands elements of
its new environment in which it is transplanted. This includes freedom from its own
parasites and predators. Further, the bio agent should be hardly enoughto survive short and
long periods of food shortage when the target weed populationis brought to a low level.

(iii) Feeding Habit: Great stress has been placed on the selection of insects as bio agents
that attack both the flowers and seeds of the weed or bore into their stems. Insect bio
agents with such feeding habits have been found more host specific and efficient in
controlling weeds than the leaf or root feeder. But lately certain leaf eating insects have
been found equally valuable in the control of weeds, particularly of the perennials. Likewise,
insects that attack roots are likely to be very effective on perennial weeds but insufficient
attention has been paid to them. In any case, the destructive capacity of a bio agent on the
weed should be very high so thatits small population could destroy large weed infestations.
(iv) Ease of Multiplication: High rate and ease of natural reproduction of bio agent is
important in insects, pathogens, snails, and competitive plants. But it is very much
unwanted in the case of carp employed for aquatic weed control because their excessive
population may compete with cultivated fish.
(v) Effective on several taxa of the weeds: The bioagent should be effective onseveral
taxa of weeds
Kinds of Classical Bio agents: - Four kinds of bio agents have thus far been
successfully used for controlling weeds, both terrestrial and aquatic. These are (i)
insects, (ii) carpfish, (iii) fungi, and (iv) competitive plants.
(i) Insects: Insects have been more frequently used than other animals for the biological
control of weeds. The first successful example of weed control with deliberately introduced
insects was reported from Hawaii in 1902 when a project for the control of Lantana camara
L. was initiated with a moth, Crocidosema lantana Busck. Since then insects belonging to
widely different families and genera have been employed to control some other noxious
weed species.
Insects selected as bio control agents of weeds are largely host specific i.e.
one insect species is employed to destroy only one weed species.
(ii) Carp-fish: Certain fresh water carp-fish consume large quantities of aquatic weeds and
they are very suitable for relieving waterbodies of their massive growth ofnoxious, aquatic
vegetation. Unlike insect bio agents, the herbivorous fish are not much food-specific. They
feed upon a wide range of plants and, therefore, they control a variety of aquatic weeds,
simultaneously. This food habit of grass carp may be undesirable in water bodies having
some plants of economic value, like water chestnut (Trapanatans) and lotus (Nelumbo spp.)
which, of course, are also classed as weeds in most situations.
(iii) Plant Pathogens: Many fungi are observed to attack specific weed species, but
examples of successful, practical weed control with fungi are few. Of late, it has been
discovered that Acacia glauca could be controlled successfully by injecting a suspension of
spores of Cephalosporium zonatum Sawada.
(iv) Competitive Plants: Certain plants may be highly competitive in nature; capable of
suppressing some specific weeds without causing any meaningful hindrance to our
interests.

Outstanding Examples of Classical Bio-control of Weeds:-
(i) Lantana (Lantana camara L.): Lantana was the first weed controlled successfully with
certain insect bioagents in Hawaii. This bushy weed is a native of Central and North America.
In Hawaii it had invaded such large area of rangelands that it was causing great concern. Of
these, Crocidosema lantana Busck, a moth, was found prominent in destroying flowers and
seeds of lantana, which formed the chief organ for dispersal this weed. The insect greatly
curtailed the spread of lantana andthinned its existing infestations. Fifty years later, the
entomologists in Hawaii made further attempts to find and introduce new insect species to
destroy lantana; this time from areas other than the native land of the weed. They found
seven more insects feeding on lantana. Of these, Hypena jussalis Guenoe was an excellent
feeder of lantana leaves. It defoliated all sizes of lantana plants rapidly. Since then many
otherinsects have been screened for the destruction of lantana in Hawaii, and the weed has
been brought under control on her different islands.
(ii) Prickly pear (Opuntia spp.): In Australia, biocontrol of Opuntia inermis with a moth,
Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg) transformed 24 million ha land from wildernessto a scene of
prosperous endeavour. At the present, in Australia only occasional plants and few larger
patches of pricklypear can be found. The recovered land has returned to useful agriculture
there. In TamilNadu and Maharastra (India), 40,000 ha of land infested with Opuntia dillenii
was recovered from the weed by releasing Dactyloplius tomentosus Auct. (D. ceylonicus
Green) ‘cichineal scale insect’ as its bioagent.
(iii) Alligator weed (Alternathera philoxeroides): Alligatorweed is a very prolific, aquatic
plant of the tropics and sub-tropics. In Florida, (U.S.A.) it has been very effectively controlled
with fleabeetle (Agasicles hygrophyla Selman Vogt) and severalbayous have been cleared of
this weed there. The fleabeetle larvae feed on the leaves of alligator weed and finally bore
into its bare stems to pupate.
(iv) Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes): Water hyacinth, a world-wide aquatic weed,
infests transplanted paddy fields in many countries, including India. Several attempts have
been made on the biological control of this weed; both by pathogens and insects. Most
success in this respect has been met in Florida (USA) with a hyacinthmoth, Sameodes
albiguttalis B. Benner, which is a native of South America. The bioagent exhibits its rapid
reproduction ability in field conditions. Its larvae feed upon young leaves and apical buds of
water hyacinth, rather severly.
(v) Salvinia (Salvinia molessta): In Kerala (India), fresh water courses and paddy fields have
been cleared of this noxious fern, using culionid beetle (Cytrobagous salviniae Sands) as a
very effective bioagent. The beetleis is native of South America. It is released in water ways
by collecting some beetle-infested Salvinia plants from either the beetle rearing ponds or
some old infestations, and scattering these on the target, salvinia infestations. It takes 4-6
months for the salvinia mats to turn yellow, and another six months to sink, completely. The
young larvae of the beetle damage the terminal buds, rhizomes, and petioles of salvinia. The
biological control of salvinia has made lives of over 5 million people in Kerala more
comfortablethan before.

BIOHERBICIDE PHILOSOPHY OF WEED CONTROL:-
Bioherbicides are pathogens cultured artificially and made available in
sprayable formulations; just like a chemical herbicide. The pathogen selected for the
purpose is usually from the native place of the weed, but it could also be from other
places. The bio-herbicides are also sometimes called myco-herbicides. A myco-
herbicides can be both, specific and non-specific.
Some Commercial Myco-herbicides in use Abroad.
Product Content Weed controlled
De-Vine A liquid suspension of fungal
spores of Phytophthora palmivora
Butler. It causes root rot in the
weed.
Stranglevine (Morrenia odorata)
in citrus orchards.
Collego Wettable powder containing fungal
spores of Colletotrichum
gloesporiodes Penzig and Sacc.
Sub sp. Aeschynomone
Jointvetch (Aeschynomone sp.)
in rice fields. The bioherbicide
causes stem and leaf blight in
the weed.
Bipolaris A suspension of fungal spores of
Bipolaris sorghicola.
Johnsongrass (Sorghum
halepense)
Biolophos A microbial toxin produced as
fermentation product of
Streptomyces hygroscopicus
Non-specific, general vegetation

Methods of weed control

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Methods of weed control (20)

More from College of Agriculture, Balaghat (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Methods of weed control