SlideShare a Scribd company logo
MGB Background & History
MGB = Routine General Surgery,
MGB vs Sleeve Data,
MGB Billroth II Rx Diabetes
MGB Background
•9:50am to 10:40am
•MGB Background
•MGB = Routine General Surgery
•Billroth II and Gastric Cancer
•MGB vs Sleeve
•MGB Billroth II Rx Diabetes
MGB Background
Ideal Bariatric Surgery
 1. Low Risk
 2. Major Weight Loss
 3. Easily performed
 4. Short operative times
 5. Outpatient or short hospital stay
 6. Minimal Blood Loss
 7. No Need for ICU Stay
 8. Minimal Pain
 9. Very High Patient Satisfaction
 10. A Good "Exit Strategy"
SUCCESS CRITERIA
"IDEAL" WEIGHT LOSS SURGERY
SUCCESS CRITERIA
"IDEAL" WEIGHT LOSS SURGERY
 11. Change Behavior & Preferences; Marked Decrease in Hunger
and Increased Satiety
 12. Minimal Retching and Vomiting
 13. Few adhesions or hernias
 14. Minimal impact on Heart and Lung Function
 15. Low Failure Rate
 16. Low Cost
 17. Short Recovery Time
 18. Rapid Return to Work
 19. Low Risk of Pulmonary Embolus
 20. Durable weight loss
SUCCESS CRITERIA
"IDEAL" WEIGHT LOSS SURGERY
 21. Low Risk of Ulcer
 22. Fat Malabsorption; low cholesterol & CV risk
 23. No Plastic Foreign Body
 24. Easily Verifiable Results; > 10 years of Results
 25. Low Risk of Bowel Obstruction
 26. Based upon sound surgical principles
 27. Independent confirmation of results
 28. Healthy life after surgery
 29. Supported by LEVEL I Evidence;
RCT (Controlled Prospective Randomized Trial)
 30. Block “Sweet Eater” Failures
History of
MGB & Dr Rutledge
History of MGB & Dr Rutledge
• Dr Rutledge Trauma Surgeon Professor of Surgery 20 years
Univ of North Carolina
• 1997 Patient: Drug Dealer, Shot by his customer
• Gun Shot Wounds X 6 to Abdomen
• 9 pm Thurs Night Sept 1997 Emergency Surgery
• Injury to Stomach, Tail of Pancreas and Multiple Loops of
Small Bowel
History of MGB
Patient w Gun Shot Wounds
• Injury to
Stomach, Pancreas and
Multiple Loops of Small Bowel
• Rx
Distal Gastrectomy
• Distal Pancreatectomy
• Splenectomy
History of MGB
RX: Antrectomy, Distal Pancreatectomy Splenectomy
History of MGB
Reconstruction Ante-Colic Billroth II
1997: Next Morning Planned Lap RNY
MGB = Standard General Surgery (Antrectomy & Billroth II)
Mini-Gastric Bypass =
General Surgery
“Antrectomy + Billroth II”
MGB No Such Thing!
Minimally Invasive Surgery in 1997
Gastric Bypass Billroth II Gastro-Jejunostomy
(NOT MASON LOOP!)
MGB = Routine, Regular, Standard
General Surgery
Partial Gastrectomy
+
Billroth II Gastro-jejunostomy
General Trauma & Oncologic
Surgeons
Routinely Use Billroth II
Examples in China, Korea
&Taiwan which have high risk of
Gastric Cancer
Gastric Cancer Rx in Korea
Billroth II used in 82%
•Study Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
•40 patients underwent Billroth II, 82%
•9 patients underwent Roux-en-Y, 18%
• Surg Endosc. 2016Aug;30(8):3559-66. Early experience of duet laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (duet-LDG) using three
abdominal ports for gastric carcinoma: surgical technique and comparison with conventional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.
Jeong O
Korean Study 2017 Treatment Choice For Gastric
Cancer Patients
• J Gastric Cancer. 2017 June
Outcomes of Patients with Gastric Cancer, Ki Hyun Kim
• 70% Billroth I, 20% Billroth II, 10% Roux-en-Y
• Billroth II Chosen 2 to 1 vs RNY for
GASTRIC CANCER by Oncologic Surgeons in **Korea**
Billroth II Routine use in Taiwan
•“Subtotal gastrectomy the surgical treatment for
early-stage distal gastric cancer, is usually
accompanied by highly selective vagotomy and
**Billroth II reconstruction **”
• Sci Rep. 2016 Feb10 Gastric microbiota and predicted gene functions are altered after subtotal
gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer Tseng CH
Reconstruction After Distal Gastrectomy
in Japan 2017
• Various methods of reconstruction after laparoscopic distal
gastrectomy Japan (Very High Rates Gastric Cancer)
• June 2009 and December 2015, we assessed 263 consecutive patients
• Billroth I (36.1%);
• Billroth II, 165 cases (62.7%);
• Roux-en-Y, 3 cases (1.1%)
• J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Jul, Laparoscopic Distal
Gastrectomy Takayama Y
Billroth II Routinely Used in China
• Clinicopathological data of 1,140 GCa patients
• May 2008 to April 2015
• 207 patients of Billroth I
•785 Billroth II
• 148 Total Gastrectomy + RNY
• ** NO RNYs for Partial Gastrectomy ** ( 0 )
• Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec[Distal gastrectomy brings a better long-term survival for patients with distal gastric cancer compared with total
gastrectomy]. Liu Z
Routine Use of Billroth II in
Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
•Study nonobese T2DM patients with
Gastric cancer => routine Billroth II
•Compared obese T2DM patients undergoing
RYGB
•Glycemic control efficacy of Billroth II Rx
nonobese T2DM
•Billroth II Similar to RNY
• Arch Med Res. 2015May Comparison of Gastric Bypass Surgeries on Managing Obese and Nonobese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus:
A Prospective Study. Zhang X
The Billroth II is a
Good Procedure!
When Done RIGHT
Bariatric Surgeons Need to Re-Learn their General
Surgery
The Mason Loop Gastric Bypass was Bad
Because
the Billroth II was MISUSED!!
MGB Mechanism of Action
NOT Band, VBG, Sleeve, RNY or BPD (SADI)
MGB v RNY
Restriction Obstructive vs Non Obstructive
Band, Sleeve & RNY: OBSTRUCTION
Block Normal Healthy Foods
•Weight Loss =>
•Increased Hunger
•Decreased Satiety
•Healthy Foods Blocked;
OBSTRUCTION
•Drive to Eat UP
•What Happens?
Conclusion:
MGB = Standard General Surgery,
Simple Operation
But
MANY Tricks and Traps
MGB = Billroth II,
Billroth II is GOOD
General Surgeons
Know How to Use the Billroth II
Bariatric Surgeons are
Often Uninformed and Fear the Billroth II
MGB = Billroth II,
Billroth II is GOOD
But!
The Operation Needs to Be Used Correctly
The Operation Can Be Performed Incorrectly
20 Years FEAR of MGB?
Mason Loop *NOT* MGB
Mason Loop = Billroth II Done Wrong
Billroth II Loop Antrum: YES, Billroth II - EGJx: NO, NEVER
• Well Informed
General
Surgeons
=>
Routinely Use
the Billroth II
(Correctly)
• Uninformed
Bariatric
Surgeons
=>
Fear the
Billroth II
Billroth II = RNY
Cancer Surgeons Routinely Use Billroth II
• 2015 Study 7 USA Cancer Centers
• 500 Patients
• Prospective Randomized Trial
• Billroth II vs. RNY for Distal Gastrectomy
• “NO advantage of Roux-en-Y over Billroth II in outcomes”
•Tran et al. To Roux or not to Roux: a comparison between Roux-en-Y and Billroth II
reconstruction following partial gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2015 Sep 23.
MGB vs Sleeve
Dr Rutledge's Results
Mini-Gastric Bypass
Dr Rutledge's Results
Mini-Gastric Bypass
Unique Advantages of the MGB
Ideal Candidates for MGB, EVERYONE?
• MGB Can Be Tailored to
Meet Patient Needs
1. Usual Bariatric Patient
2. Diabetic
(2x more Effective)
3. Super Obese
(Max Power/Effective)
4. GERD Patient
5. Difficult/Psych Patient
(Reversible <60 min)
6. Severely Ill/Liver Disease
(Two Stage MGB)
7. Borderline Patient
(Reversible <60 min)
8. Frail/Elderly
(Low Risk)
9. Young Unmarried Female
(Reversible/Revisable)
10. FUTURE PATIENTS?
(Non-obese Diabetics)
MGB “Best”/Good Bariatric Surgery?
Example Recent Study: MGB is “Good Surgery”
Obes Surg. 2017 Sep;27(9):2479-2487
=> MGB vs. Sleeve Gastrectomy <=
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, Magouliotis DE
* 17 * studies *6,761* patients
“This study reveals:”
MGB Better “Weight loss, Remission of comorbidities,
Shorter hospital stay, & Lower Mortality”
“Sleeve Higher Rate GERD” (=> Barrett's & Esophageal Cancer)
“MGB simpler, safer, and more effective than Sleeve”
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec
• Comparison of safety and effectiveness between
• Mini-gastric bypass vs Sleeve gastrectomy:
A meta-analysis and systematic review.
• Wang FG
“Mini-gastric bypass simpler, safer, and more effective than
laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy”
• “Due to safe and simple process and effective
outcomes
• laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass has become
one of the most popular procedures in some
countries”
“Mini-gastric bypass simpler, safer, and more effective than
laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy”
METHODS:
A systematic literature search
was performed
“Mini-Gastric Bypass had a
lot of advantages”
1. Higher 1-year EWL%
(excess weight loss),
2. Higher 5-year EWL%,
3. Lower leak rate,
4. Higher T2DM remission
rate, higher hypertension
remission rate, higher
obstructive sleep apnea
(OSA) remission rate,
5. Lower overall late
complications rate,
6. Lower gastroesophageal
reflux disease (GERD) rate,
7. Shorter hospital stay and
8. Lower revision rate.
Obes Surg. 2017 Nov 3. Revisional Gastric Bypass for Failed Restrictive Procedures:
Comparison of Single-Anastomosis (Mini-) and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Almalki OM
• 2001 - 2015, 116 patients
• Failed restrictive operations
• Revisional bypass surgery
(R-MGB vs. R-RNY)
• R-RNY significantly longer operative times than R-MGB.
• R-MGB shown to be
Simpler procedure with
Better weight loss than R-RNY
Sleeve, RNY & Others are
Good...
The MGB is As Good as or
Better Than ...
BUT
The MGB has Been Shown to
Be One of the Most Effective
and Powerful Forms of
Bariatric Surgery
In Hundreds of Papers it Has
Also Been Shown to Be a Safe
and Simple Procedure
BUT...
Mgb background intro
The MGB
Has Great Power
The MGB Surgeon Has
Great Responsibility
Tips and Tricks
MGB: Done Well is a Simple Operation
But: Surgeon Needs to Understand
Anatomy & Physiology =>
Mechanism of Action => Technique
Need for Safety
• Beware of Brave Surgeons
• Need to Understand
1. How to Avoid Trouble
2. How to Get Out of Trouble
“Mini-Gastric Bypass”
Done Right!
(Note, If you wish to do MGB or Omega Loop
etc. Of course, No Problem
But,If you wish to do MGB,
This is How We Do It!)
​Dr. Rutledge,
Email: DrRutledge@gmail.com
Facebook: DrRRutledge
Facebook Messenger: @DrRRutledge
WhatsApp: Dr Rutledge +1 (442) 234-3237
+1 (702) - 483-7133
Youtube: DrRRutledge
Widespread
Confusion and
Misunderstanding of the
Billroth II
and the MGB
The Billroth II
is a good safe operation
that makes people
healthier
While Some bariatric Surgeons Fear the Billroth II
General Surgeons Routinely Use the Billroth II
The Billroth II
is a good safe operation
that makes people
healthier
Studies Show
Billroth II
Decreases the Risk of
Stroke, Coronary Heart Disease & Diabetes and more
A Nationwide Population-Based Study
Billroth II Decreased Risk of Stroke
• 6,425 patients Billroth II for Ulcer
• Nationwide Health Database
• Matched with 25,602 Ulcer Pts who did not
receive Billroth II
• Billroth II patients had a lower risk of Stroke!
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Apr;95(16)
A Nationwide Population-Based Study
Billroth II Decreased Risk of Coronary Heart Disease.
• BII for Ulcer
•National Health Insurance Database
• Matched with 25,602 Ulcer Pts did not receive
Billroth II
• Billroth II patients 20%+ Decreased Risk of Coronary
Heart Disease
• Obes Surg. 2017 Jun;27(6):1604-1611
A Nationwide Population-Based Study
Billroth II Decreased Risk of Diabetes by Almost 50%
• National Health Insurance Database
• Matched with patients did not receive Billroth II
• Billroth II patients of Diabetes (adjusted hazard ratio
(aHR): 0.56)
• PLoS One. 2016 Nov 28;11(11)
Billroth II in Thousands of
General Surgery Patients
• Billroth II =>
• Decreases the risk of
• Stroke
• Coronary Heart Disease
• Diabetes
• General Surgeons Routinely Use the MGB
General Surgery Data
• Comparison
• Gastrectomy + Billroth I
(No Duodenal Exclusion) => Like Sleeve
• Gastrectomy Billroth II
(WITH Duodenal Exclusion) = Like MGB
Understand Advantage of
Billroth II vs Billroth I, (i.e. MGB vs
Sleeve)
• General Surgery
• 2-year Diabetes remission rate:
Billroth I 39% (Sleeve No Duodenal Exclusion)
Billroth II 50% (MGB WITH Duodenal Exclusion)
• BII significantly increased diabetes remission
• (odds ratio, * 3.2 *) in covariate-adjusted logistic
regression analysis
Bariatric Studies
Confirm
General Surgery Studies
5-year results of a randomized trial
Sleeve gastrectomy vs Mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of type 2 diabetes
Obes Surg. 2014
• Double-blind randomized trial,
HbA1c > 7.5%, BMI 25 - 35 Kg/m(2)
Type 2 diabetes
• At 60 months
• 60% MGB
• 30% SG
• Achieved the primary end points
• MGB Twice as Effective as Sleeve
General Surgery And
Randomized Controlled Trials
In Bariatric Surgery
Demonstrate
MGB Much More Effective
In Treating Diabetes Than Sleeve
MGB Excellent Outcomes
in Experienced Hands
Examples from Few Recent
Studies
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Feb, Abu-Abeid
Diabetes resolution after MGB
• 25% had diabetes with average glycosylated hemoglobin of 8.6
± 1.9 g%
• Average excess weight loss 1 year after surgery was 88.9 ± 27.3
• Of all diabetic patients, only 7.8% were still diabetic average
glycosylated hemoglobin of 5.4 ± 0.6
• CONCLUSIONS: MGB offers excellent resolution of diabetes.
Evaluation of Weight Loss Indicators and Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric
Bypass Outcomes.
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 31, Carbajo MA
• Bilio-pancreatic loop length was 275 ± 24 cm
• Hospital stay was 24 hours in 98%
• No surgical complications arose.
• Weight decreased significantly during follow-up
(P < 0.001).
• Greatest weight loss was observed at 12 months
post surgery (69 ± 13 kg).
15-year experience of laparoscopic single anastomosis (mini-)gastric
bypass: comparison with other bariatric procedures, Alkhalifah N Surg Endosc. 2018
Jan 8,
• “Mini-gastric bypass (MGB) has been validated as a safe and effective treatment
for morbid obesity”
• 1,731 morbidly obese patients
• 30-day post-operative major complication 1.7% less than RNY & Sleeve
• At postoperative 1, 5 & 10 yrs,
%WL of MGB patients 33 -29%
• The MGB had a higher weight loss than RNY & LSG
2-6 years after surgery.
• Revision rate of MGB 4.0%
Lower than RNY & LSG.
MGB Best Bariatric Surgery ?
Sample Recent Study
Obes Surg. 2017 Sep;27(9):2479-2487
MGB vs. Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity:
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Magouliotis DE
Seventeen studies 6,761 patients
This study reveals:
“increased weight loss, remission of comorbidities, shorter mean hospital
stay, and lower mortality in the MGB group”
“Sleeve Higher Rate GERD”
Obes Surg. 2017 Nov 3. Revisional Gastric Bypass for Failed Restrictive Procedures:
Comparison of Single-Anastomosis (Mini-) and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Almalki
OM1,
• May 2001 to December 2015, a total of 116 patients with
• failed restrictive bariatric operations
• underwent laparoscopic revisional bypass surgery (81 R-MGB
and 35 R-RNY).
• R-RNY had significantly longer operative times than R-MGB.
• R-MGB was shown to be a simpler procedure with better
weight reduction than R-RNY
Mini-Gastric Bypass
Tragic/Deadly in the
Wrong Hands
MGB Billroth II Rx Diabetes
• Simple
• Elegant
• Effective
• Durable > 15 yrs
• Powerful
• Tailored to Patient
• Reversible
• Revisable
Mgb background intro
Diabetes and the “Metabolic
Surgeon”
•Diabetes mellitus is reaching epidemic
proportions
•"The level of morbidity and mortality due to
diabetes and its
potential complications are enormous, and
pose significant healthcare burden"
Imagine 20 years of Diabetes
• Rx #
•finger sticks 29,200 sticks
•1 med 4/d 29,200 tabs
•2 meds 6tabs/d 43,800 tabs
•Insulin 2/d 14,600 injections
Imagine 20 years of Diabetes
•Blindness
•Heart Attack
•Stroke
•Death
•Renal Failure
•Amputation
Imagine 20 years of Diabetes
•Blindness
•Heart Attack
•Stroke
•Death
•Renal Failure
•Amputation
Imagine 20 years of Diabetes
•Blindness
•Heart Attack
•Stroke
•Death
•Renal Failure
•Amputation
Imagine 20 years of Diabetes
•Blindness
•Heart Attack
•Stroke
•Death
•Renal Failure
•Amputation
Imagine 20 years of Diabetes
•Blindness
•Heart Attack
•Stroke
•Death
•Renal Failure
•Amputation
Imagine 20 years of Diabetes
•Blindness
•Heart Attack
•Stroke
•Death
•Renal Failure
•Amputation
Imagine 20 years of Diabetes
•Blindness
•Heart Attack
•Stroke
•Death
•Renal Failure
•Amputation
Imagine 20 years of Diabetes
•Imagine!
•If Diabetes could be cured or
Major Improvement
•20-30 Minutes
•1-2 days in Hospital
USA
Obesity / Diabetes
Epidemic Costs
$2 Trillion a Year
Diabetes
Diabetes in Italy
Burden of diabetes mellitus
estimated with a longitudinal
population-based study
Research Center on Public Health,
University of Milan Bicocca, Milan,
Italy
Italian Diabetes Study 2014
Imagine!
A Solution to
Diabetes
(For SEVERE DIABETICS)
Surgery Can Successfully Treat
Obesity and Diabetes
But Imagine Improvement or
Even Cure in the
Both the Obese
And the
Thin Diabetic Patient
•A new perspective on
an old surgical method
•A systematic review and meta-analysis General
Surgery
Billroth II in Type 2 Diabetes
•Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015
• General Surgery Studies show that
• Subtotal gastrectomy for cancer or ulcers
+
• Billroth II (BII) >> Billroth I (BI)
• More effective Rx Type 2 Diabetes
• BII (MGB) More Effective Rx BI (Sleeve)
•Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015
Billroth II
is a Good Procedure!
“May be the Ideal Rx
Thin Diabetics!”
•“Conclusions: BII reconstruction after subtotal
gastrectomy for cancer or ulcers more effectively
improved T2D than BI reconstruction.”
•“Billroth II provides a treatment strategy for
diabetic patients and enable metabolic surgery
for Non-obese patients
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015
The Future
Metabolic Surgery
Metabolic surgeons
Lower Weight Diabetics
• What is our future?
• METABOLIC SURGERY
• We are “Metabolic Surgeons”
The Future
Already HERE
Metabolic Surgery
Lower Weight Diabetics
2/3 MGB Surgeons are Doing
METABOLIC SURGERY
on thin diabetics
We are “Metabolic Surgeons”
Mgb background intro
Imagine!
A Solution to
Diabetes
Bariatric Surgery in
Thin Diabetics
It is Already here!
RNY in Thin Diabetics
Bad Outcomes
Mgb background intro
Mgb background intro
50% 90%
Mgb background intro

More Related Content

PPT
Comparison of Revision in Roux-en-Y vs Mini-Gastric Bypass
PPT
Kular debate rn yv-mgb 2
PPTX
Mini-Gastric Bypass Done Right: A Description of the Surgical Technique
PPTX
Understanding the Mechanism of Action of the Mini-Gastric Bypass
PPT
Sleeve, Band, RNY and the Mini-Gastric Bypass
PPTX
MGB Tips and Ticks
PPT
The Mini-Gastric Bypass: Best Rx Diabetes
PPT
Five Year Outcome Sleeve Gastrectomy Mini-Gastric Bypass From a Community Hos...
Comparison of Revision in Roux-en-Y vs Mini-Gastric Bypass
Kular debate rn yv-mgb 2
Mini-Gastric Bypass Done Right: A Description of the Surgical Technique
Understanding the Mechanism of Action of the Mini-Gastric Bypass
Sleeve, Band, RNY and the Mini-Gastric Bypass
MGB Tips and Ticks
The Mini-Gastric Bypass: Best Rx Diabetes
Five Year Outcome Sleeve Gastrectomy Mini-Gastric Bypass From a Community Hos...

What's hot (17)

PPTX
SHORT AND LONG TERM COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING THE MINI-GASTRIC BYPASS
PPTX
Complications & Revision of the MGB
PPTX
Understanding Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery
PPT
Dr r mini gastric bypass complications-2
PPT
Mini-Gastric Bypass in the United Kingdom
PPT
Marginalulcergastricbypass4 blue
PPTX
Prevent & Treat Bile Reflux
PPTX
Prevent & Rx Bile Reflux
PPT
Critics of the Mini-Gastric Bypass were Wrong
PPTX
Mini-Gastric Bypass: Best Surgery;
PPTX
Apc RISK OF GASTRIC CANCER AFTER BILLROTH II IN THE MINI-GASTRIC BYPASS
PPTX
Intro to Mini-Gastric Bypass (Dr Rutledge) Why? + MGB v Sleeve
PPTX
Apc a-00025-bile reflux gastritis and marginal ulcer
PPTX
Understanding weight loss after bariatric surgery
PPTX
Presentation; Marginal ulcer gastric bypass
PPTX
Surgeons' Confusion & Misunderstanding the MGB: Bile, Bile Reflux, Bile Reflu...
SHORT AND LONG TERM COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING THE MINI-GASTRIC BYPASS
Complications & Revision of the MGB
Understanding Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery
Dr r mini gastric bypass complications-2
Mini-Gastric Bypass in the United Kingdom
Marginalulcergastricbypass4 blue
Prevent & Treat Bile Reflux
Prevent & Rx Bile Reflux
Critics of the Mini-Gastric Bypass were Wrong
Mini-Gastric Bypass: Best Surgery;
Apc RISK OF GASTRIC CANCER AFTER BILLROTH II IN THE MINI-GASTRIC BYPASS
Intro to Mini-Gastric Bypass (Dr Rutledge) Why? + MGB v Sleeve
Apc a-00025-bile reflux gastritis and marginal ulcer
Understanding weight loss after bariatric surgery
Presentation; Marginal ulcer gastric bypass
Surgeons' Confusion & Misunderstanding the MGB: Bile, Bile Reflux, Bile Reflu...
Ad

Similar to Mgb background intro (20)

PPTX
MGB Need for Standardization, Education & Recognition
PPTX
Different & Better: the MGB-OAGB
PPTX
Choice weightlosssurgery 2
PPTX
MGB Background MGB = Routine Surgery, MGB vs Sleeve Data, MGB Billroth II Rx...
PPTX
Mgb billroth II Hx
PPT
Kular mgb in obese diabetics 2
PPTX
Common Complication, Errors & Misunderstandings in the MGB
PPT
UNDERSTANDING THE BILLROTH II
PPT
Understanding, Prevention & Treatment Of Symptomatic Bile Reflux
PPT
The Mini-Gastric Bypass:Best Treatment Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
PPTX
The 4 MGB Things
PPTX
Marginal ulcer gastric bypass
PPTX
Marginal ulcer gastric bypass (MGB vs RNY)
PPTX
Mgb mechanism of action
PPTX
Gastric bypass complications
PPTX
MGB Bronze Certification Course
PPTX
Fear of Bile Reflux and Gastric Cancer after Billroth II Gastro-Jejunostomy
PPTX
MGB, the Billroth II as Ideal Bariatric Surgery Dubai
PPT
Fear of Cancer , General Surgeons Use the Billroth II , Bariatric Surgeons FE...
PPTX
Fear of Gastric Cancer and the Billroth II
MGB Need for Standardization, Education & Recognition
Different & Better: the MGB-OAGB
Choice weightlosssurgery 2
MGB Background MGB = Routine Surgery, MGB vs Sleeve Data, MGB Billroth II Rx...
Mgb billroth II Hx
Kular mgb in obese diabetics 2
Common Complication, Errors & Misunderstandings in the MGB
UNDERSTANDING THE BILLROTH II
Understanding, Prevention & Treatment Of Symptomatic Bile Reflux
The Mini-Gastric Bypass:Best Treatment Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
The 4 MGB Things
Marginal ulcer gastric bypass
Marginal ulcer gastric bypass (MGB vs RNY)
Mgb mechanism of action
Gastric bypass complications
MGB Bronze Certification Course
Fear of Bile Reflux and Gastric Cancer after Billroth II Gastro-Jejunostomy
MGB, the Billroth II as Ideal Bariatric Surgery Dubai
Fear of Cancer , General Surgeons Use the Billroth II , Bariatric Surgeons FE...
Fear of Gastric Cancer and the Billroth II
Ad

More from Dr. Robert Rutledge (15)

PPTX
Introducing the MGB2.pptx
PPTX
Bp limb length microbiome
PPT
Gastric cancer & Billroth II & the MGB
PPT
Why the band and sleeve fail
PPTX
Mgb cancer & MGB Guidelines
PPT
Mgb Review Corp 10 (2)
PPTX
Dr Rutledge, Mini-Gastric Bypass & Bilio-Pancreatic Limb Length,
PPTX
Dr Rutledge Use of the Mini-Gastric Bypass for "Thin" Diabetics
PPTX
Dr Rutledge: MGB (Mini-Gastric Bypass) Guidelines Project
PPTX
Dr Rutledge Introduction & Background Mini-Gastric Bypass
PPTX
MGB w sleeve ports twisted pouch other errors
PPTX
MGB twisted pouch syndrome (2)
PPTX
Prediction of weight loss following Mini-Gastric Bypass
PPTX
Understanding the MGB & GERD
PPT
Understanding, Prevention & Treatment Of Symptomatic Bile Reflux
Introducing the MGB2.pptx
Bp limb length microbiome
Gastric cancer & Billroth II & the MGB
Why the band and sleeve fail
Mgb cancer & MGB Guidelines
Mgb Review Corp 10 (2)
Dr Rutledge, Mini-Gastric Bypass & Bilio-Pancreatic Limb Length,
Dr Rutledge Use of the Mini-Gastric Bypass for "Thin" Diabetics
Dr Rutledge: MGB (Mini-Gastric Bypass) Guidelines Project
Dr Rutledge Introduction & Background Mini-Gastric Bypass
MGB w sleeve ports twisted pouch other errors
MGB twisted pouch syndrome (2)
Prediction of weight loss following Mini-Gastric Bypass
Understanding the MGB & GERD
Understanding, Prevention & Treatment Of Symptomatic Bile Reflux

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
NRPchitwan6ab2802f9.pptxnepalindiaindiaindiapakistan
PPTX
Anatomy and physiology of the digestive system
PPTX
NASO ALVEOLAR MOULDNIG IN CLEFT LIP AND PALATE PATIENT
PPTX
antibiotics rational use of antibiotics.pptx
PDF
Extended-Expanded-role-of-Nurses.pdf is a key for student Nurses
PPT
Rheumatology Member of Royal College of Physicians.ppt
PDF
Intl J Gynecology Obste - 2021 - Melamed - FIGO International Federation o...
PDF
SEMEN PREPARATION TECHNIGUES FOR INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION.pdf
PDF
Oral Aspect of Metabolic Disease_20250717_192438_0000.pdf
PDF
شيت_عطا_0000000000000000000000000000.pdf
PPT
Copy-Histopathology Practical by CMDA ESUTH CHAPTER(0) - Copy.ppt
PPTX
Electrolyte Disturbance in Paediatric - Nitthi.pptx
PPT
MENTAL HEALTH - NOTES.ppt for nursing students
PPT
neurology Member of Royal College of Physicians (MRCP).ppt
PPTX
preoerative assessment in anesthesia and critical care medicine
PPTX
Clinical approach and Radiotherapy principles.pptx
PPTX
ANATOMY OF MEDULLA OBLANGATA AND SYNDROMES.pptx
PPTX
ONCOLOGY Principles of Radiotherapy.pptx
PPT
HIV lecture final - student.pptfghjjkkejjhhge
PPTX
Cardiovascular - antihypertensive medical backgrounds
NRPchitwan6ab2802f9.pptxnepalindiaindiaindiapakistan
Anatomy and physiology of the digestive system
NASO ALVEOLAR MOULDNIG IN CLEFT LIP AND PALATE PATIENT
antibiotics rational use of antibiotics.pptx
Extended-Expanded-role-of-Nurses.pdf is a key for student Nurses
Rheumatology Member of Royal College of Physicians.ppt
Intl J Gynecology Obste - 2021 - Melamed - FIGO International Federation o...
SEMEN PREPARATION TECHNIGUES FOR INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION.pdf
Oral Aspect of Metabolic Disease_20250717_192438_0000.pdf
شيت_عطا_0000000000000000000000000000.pdf
Copy-Histopathology Practical by CMDA ESUTH CHAPTER(0) - Copy.ppt
Electrolyte Disturbance in Paediatric - Nitthi.pptx
MENTAL HEALTH - NOTES.ppt for nursing students
neurology Member of Royal College of Physicians (MRCP).ppt
preoerative assessment in anesthesia and critical care medicine
Clinical approach and Radiotherapy principles.pptx
ANATOMY OF MEDULLA OBLANGATA AND SYNDROMES.pptx
ONCOLOGY Principles of Radiotherapy.pptx
HIV lecture final - student.pptfghjjkkejjhhge
Cardiovascular - antihypertensive medical backgrounds

Mgb background intro

  • 1. MGB Background & History MGB = Routine General Surgery, MGB vs Sleeve Data, MGB Billroth II Rx Diabetes
  • 2. MGB Background •9:50am to 10:40am •MGB Background •MGB = Routine General Surgery •Billroth II and Gastric Cancer •MGB vs Sleeve •MGB Billroth II Rx Diabetes
  • 4.  1. Low Risk  2. Major Weight Loss  3. Easily performed  4. Short operative times  5. Outpatient or short hospital stay  6. Minimal Blood Loss  7. No Need for ICU Stay  8. Minimal Pain  9. Very High Patient Satisfaction  10. A Good "Exit Strategy" SUCCESS CRITERIA "IDEAL" WEIGHT LOSS SURGERY
  • 5. SUCCESS CRITERIA "IDEAL" WEIGHT LOSS SURGERY  11. Change Behavior & Preferences; Marked Decrease in Hunger and Increased Satiety  12. Minimal Retching and Vomiting  13. Few adhesions or hernias  14. Minimal impact on Heart and Lung Function  15. Low Failure Rate  16. Low Cost  17. Short Recovery Time  18. Rapid Return to Work  19. Low Risk of Pulmonary Embolus  20. Durable weight loss
  • 6. SUCCESS CRITERIA "IDEAL" WEIGHT LOSS SURGERY  21. Low Risk of Ulcer  22. Fat Malabsorption; low cholesterol & CV risk  23. No Plastic Foreign Body  24. Easily Verifiable Results; > 10 years of Results  25. Low Risk of Bowel Obstruction  26. Based upon sound surgical principles  27. Independent confirmation of results  28. Healthy life after surgery  29. Supported by LEVEL I Evidence; RCT (Controlled Prospective Randomized Trial)  30. Block “Sweet Eater” Failures
  • 7. History of MGB & Dr Rutledge
  • 8. History of MGB & Dr Rutledge • Dr Rutledge Trauma Surgeon Professor of Surgery 20 years Univ of North Carolina • 1997 Patient: Drug Dealer, Shot by his customer • Gun Shot Wounds X 6 to Abdomen • 9 pm Thurs Night Sept 1997 Emergency Surgery • Injury to Stomach, Tail of Pancreas and Multiple Loops of Small Bowel
  • 9. History of MGB Patient w Gun Shot Wounds • Injury to Stomach, Pancreas and Multiple Loops of Small Bowel • Rx Distal Gastrectomy • Distal Pancreatectomy • Splenectomy
  • 10. History of MGB RX: Antrectomy, Distal Pancreatectomy Splenectomy
  • 11. History of MGB Reconstruction Ante-Colic Billroth II
  • 12. 1997: Next Morning Planned Lap RNY MGB = Standard General Surgery (Antrectomy & Billroth II)
  • 13. Mini-Gastric Bypass = General Surgery “Antrectomy + Billroth II” MGB No Such Thing! Minimally Invasive Surgery in 1997 Gastric Bypass Billroth II Gastro-Jejunostomy (NOT MASON LOOP!)
  • 14. MGB = Routine, Regular, Standard General Surgery Partial Gastrectomy + Billroth II Gastro-jejunostomy
  • 15. General Trauma & Oncologic Surgeons Routinely Use Billroth II Examples in China, Korea &Taiwan which have high risk of Gastric Cancer
  • 16. Gastric Cancer Rx in Korea Billroth II used in 82% •Study Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer •40 patients underwent Billroth II, 82% •9 patients underwent Roux-en-Y, 18% • Surg Endosc. 2016Aug;30(8):3559-66. Early experience of duet laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (duet-LDG) using three abdominal ports for gastric carcinoma: surgical technique and comparison with conventional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Jeong O
  • 17. Korean Study 2017 Treatment Choice For Gastric Cancer Patients • J Gastric Cancer. 2017 June Outcomes of Patients with Gastric Cancer, Ki Hyun Kim • 70% Billroth I, 20% Billroth II, 10% Roux-en-Y • Billroth II Chosen 2 to 1 vs RNY for GASTRIC CANCER by Oncologic Surgeons in **Korea**
  • 18. Billroth II Routine use in Taiwan •“Subtotal gastrectomy the surgical treatment for early-stage distal gastric cancer, is usually accompanied by highly selective vagotomy and **Billroth II reconstruction **” • Sci Rep. 2016 Feb10 Gastric microbiota and predicted gene functions are altered after subtotal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer Tseng CH
  • 19. Reconstruction After Distal Gastrectomy in Japan 2017 • Various methods of reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy Japan (Very High Rates Gastric Cancer) • June 2009 and December 2015, we assessed 263 consecutive patients • Billroth I (36.1%); • Billroth II, 165 cases (62.7%); • Roux-en-Y, 3 cases (1.1%) • J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Jul, Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Takayama Y
  • 20. Billroth II Routinely Used in China • Clinicopathological data of 1,140 GCa patients • May 2008 to April 2015 • 207 patients of Billroth I •785 Billroth II • 148 Total Gastrectomy + RNY • ** NO RNYs for Partial Gastrectomy ** ( 0 ) • Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec[Distal gastrectomy brings a better long-term survival for patients with distal gastric cancer compared with total gastrectomy]. Liu Z
  • 21. Routine Use of Billroth II in Sichuan, People's Republic of China. •Study nonobese T2DM patients with Gastric cancer => routine Billroth II •Compared obese T2DM patients undergoing RYGB •Glycemic control efficacy of Billroth II Rx nonobese T2DM •Billroth II Similar to RNY • Arch Med Res. 2015May Comparison of Gastric Bypass Surgeries on Managing Obese and Nonobese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Study. Zhang X
  • 22. The Billroth II is a Good Procedure! When Done RIGHT Bariatric Surgeons Need to Re-Learn their General Surgery The Mason Loop Gastric Bypass was Bad Because the Billroth II was MISUSED!!
  • 23. MGB Mechanism of Action NOT Band, VBG, Sleeve, RNY or BPD (SADI)
  • 24. MGB v RNY Restriction Obstructive vs Non Obstructive
  • 25. Band, Sleeve & RNY: OBSTRUCTION Block Normal Healthy Foods •Weight Loss => •Increased Hunger •Decreased Satiety •Healthy Foods Blocked; OBSTRUCTION •Drive to Eat UP •What Happens?
  • 26. Conclusion: MGB = Standard General Surgery, Simple Operation But MANY Tricks and Traps
  • 27. MGB = Billroth II, Billroth II is GOOD General Surgeons Know How to Use the Billroth II Bariatric Surgeons are Often Uninformed and Fear the Billroth II
  • 28. MGB = Billroth II, Billroth II is GOOD But! The Operation Needs to Be Used Correctly The Operation Can Be Performed Incorrectly
  • 29. 20 Years FEAR of MGB? Mason Loop *NOT* MGB Mason Loop = Billroth II Done Wrong
  • 30. Billroth II Loop Antrum: YES, Billroth II - EGJx: NO, NEVER
  • 31. • Well Informed General Surgeons => Routinely Use the Billroth II (Correctly) • Uninformed Bariatric Surgeons => Fear the Billroth II
  • 32. Billroth II = RNY Cancer Surgeons Routinely Use Billroth II • 2015 Study 7 USA Cancer Centers • 500 Patients • Prospective Randomized Trial • Billroth II vs. RNY for Distal Gastrectomy • “NO advantage of Roux-en-Y over Billroth II in outcomes” •Tran et al. To Roux or not to Roux: a comparison between Roux-en-Y and Billroth II reconstruction following partial gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2015 Sep 23.
  • 36. Unique Advantages of the MGB Ideal Candidates for MGB, EVERYONE? • MGB Can Be Tailored to Meet Patient Needs 1. Usual Bariatric Patient 2. Diabetic (2x more Effective) 3. Super Obese (Max Power/Effective) 4. GERD Patient 5. Difficult/Psych Patient (Reversible <60 min) 6. Severely Ill/Liver Disease (Two Stage MGB) 7. Borderline Patient (Reversible <60 min) 8. Frail/Elderly (Low Risk) 9. Young Unmarried Female (Reversible/Revisable) 10. FUTURE PATIENTS? (Non-obese Diabetics)
  • 37. MGB “Best”/Good Bariatric Surgery? Example Recent Study: MGB is “Good Surgery” Obes Surg. 2017 Sep;27(9):2479-2487 => MGB vs. Sleeve Gastrectomy <= Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, Magouliotis DE * 17 * studies *6,761* patients “This study reveals:” MGB Better “Weight loss, Remission of comorbidities, Shorter hospital stay, & Lower Mortality” “Sleeve Higher Rate GERD” (=> Barrett's & Esophageal Cancer)
  • 38. “MGB simpler, safer, and more effective than Sleeve” • Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec • Comparison of safety and effectiveness between • Mini-gastric bypass vs Sleeve gastrectomy: A meta-analysis and systematic review. • Wang FG
  • 39. “Mini-gastric bypass simpler, safer, and more effective than laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy” • “Due to safe and simple process and effective outcomes • laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass has become one of the most popular procedures in some countries”
  • 40. “Mini-gastric bypass simpler, safer, and more effective than laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy” METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed “Mini-Gastric Bypass had a lot of advantages” 1. Higher 1-year EWL% (excess weight loss), 2. Higher 5-year EWL%, 3. Lower leak rate, 4. Higher T2DM remission rate, higher hypertension remission rate, higher obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) remission rate, 5. Lower overall late complications rate, 6. Lower gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) rate, 7. Shorter hospital stay and 8. Lower revision rate.
  • 41. Obes Surg. 2017 Nov 3. Revisional Gastric Bypass for Failed Restrictive Procedures: Comparison of Single-Anastomosis (Mini-) and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Almalki OM • 2001 - 2015, 116 patients • Failed restrictive operations • Revisional bypass surgery (R-MGB vs. R-RNY) • R-RNY significantly longer operative times than R-MGB. • R-MGB shown to be Simpler procedure with Better weight loss than R-RNY
  • 42. Sleeve, RNY & Others are Good... The MGB is As Good as or Better Than ... BUT
  • 43. The MGB has Been Shown to Be One of the Most Effective and Powerful Forms of Bariatric Surgery In Hundreds of Papers it Has Also Been Shown to Be a Safe and Simple Procedure BUT...
  • 45. The MGB Has Great Power The MGB Surgeon Has Great Responsibility Tips and Tricks MGB: Done Well is a Simple Operation But: Surgeon Needs to Understand Anatomy & Physiology => Mechanism of Action => Technique
  • 46. Need for Safety • Beware of Brave Surgeons • Need to Understand 1. How to Avoid Trouble 2. How to Get Out of Trouble
  • 47. “Mini-Gastric Bypass” Done Right! (Note, If you wish to do MGB or Omega Loop etc. Of course, No Problem But,If you wish to do MGB, This is How We Do It!) ​Dr. Rutledge, Email: DrRutledge@gmail.com Facebook: DrRRutledge Facebook Messenger: @DrRRutledge WhatsApp: Dr Rutledge +1 (442) 234-3237 +1 (702) - 483-7133 Youtube: DrRRutledge
  • 48. Widespread Confusion and Misunderstanding of the Billroth II and the MGB
  • 49. The Billroth II is a good safe operation that makes people healthier While Some bariatric Surgeons Fear the Billroth II General Surgeons Routinely Use the Billroth II
  • 50. The Billroth II is a good safe operation that makes people healthier Studies Show Billroth II Decreases the Risk of Stroke, Coronary Heart Disease & Diabetes and more
  • 51. A Nationwide Population-Based Study Billroth II Decreased Risk of Stroke • 6,425 patients Billroth II for Ulcer • Nationwide Health Database • Matched with 25,602 Ulcer Pts who did not receive Billroth II • Billroth II patients had a lower risk of Stroke! • Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Apr;95(16)
  • 52. A Nationwide Population-Based Study Billroth II Decreased Risk of Coronary Heart Disease. • BII for Ulcer •National Health Insurance Database • Matched with 25,602 Ulcer Pts did not receive Billroth II • Billroth II patients 20%+ Decreased Risk of Coronary Heart Disease • Obes Surg. 2017 Jun;27(6):1604-1611
  • 53. A Nationwide Population-Based Study Billroth II Decreased Risk of Diabetes by Almost 50% • National Health Insurance Database • Matched with patients did not receive Billroth II • Billroth II patients of Diabetes (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.56) • PLoS One. 2016 Nov 28;11(11)
  • 54. Billroth II in Thousands of General Surgery Patients • Billroth II => • Decreases the risk of • Stroke • Coronary Heart Disease • Diabetes • General Surgeons Routinely Use the MGB
  • 55. General Surgery Data • Comparison • Gastrectomy + Billroth I (No Duodenal Exclusion) => Like Sleeve • Gastrectomy Billroth II (WITH Duodenal Exclusion) = Like MGB
  • 56. Understand Advantage of Billroth II vs Billroth I, (i.e. MGB vs Sleeve) • General Surgery • 2-year Diabetes remission rate: Billroth I 39% (Sleeve No Duodenal Exclusion) Billroth II 50% (MGB WITH Duodenal Exclusion) • BII significantly increased diabetes remission • (odds ratio, * 3.2 *) in covariate-adjusted logistic regression analysis
  • 58. 5-year results of a randomized trial Sleeve gastrectomy vs Mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of type 2 diabetes Obes Surg. 2014 • Double-blind randomized trial, HbA1c > 7.5%, BMI 25 - 35 Kg/m(2) Type 2 diabetes • At 60 months • 60% MGB • 30% SG • Achieved the primary end points • MGB Twice as Effective as Sleeve
  • 59. General Surgery And Randomized Controlled Trials In Bariatric Surgery Demonstrate MGB Much More Effective In Treating Diabetes Than Sleeve
  • 60. MGB Excellent Outcomes in Experienced Hands Examples from Few Recent Studies
  • 61. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Feb, Abu-Abeid Diabetes resolution after MGB • 25% had diabetes with average glycosylated hemoglobin of 8.6 ± 1.9 g% • Average excess weight loss 1 year after surgery was 88.9 ± 27.3 • Of all diabetic patients, only 7.8% were still diabetic average glycosylated hemoglobin of 5.4 ± 0.6 • CONCLUSIONS: MGB offers excellent resolution of diabetes.
  • 62. Evaluation of Weight Loss Indicators and Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Outcomes. Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 31, Carbajo MA • Bilio-pancreatic loop length was 275 ± 24 cm • Hospital stay was 24 hours in 98% • No surgical complications arose. • Weight decreased significantly during follow-up (P < 0.001). • Greatest weight loss was observed at 12 months post surgery (69 ± 13 kg).
  • 63. 15-year experience of laparoscopic single anastomosis (mini-)gastric bypass: comparison with other bariatric procedures, Alkhalifah N Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan 8, • “Mini-gastric bypass (MGB) has been validated as a safe and effective treatment for morbid obesity” • 1,731 morbidly obese patients • 30-day post-operative major complication 1.7% less than RNY & Sleeve • At postoperative 1, 5 & 10 yrs, %WL of MGB patients 33 -29% • The MGB had a higher weight loss than RNY & LSG 2-6 years after surgery. • Revision rate of MGB 4.0% Lower than RNY & LSG.
  • 64. MGB Best Bariatric Surgery ? Sample Recent Study Obes Surg. 2017 Sep;27(9):2479-2487 MGB vs. Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Magouliotis DE Seventeen studies 6,761 patients This study reveals: “increased weight loss, remission of comorbidities, shorter mean hospital stay, and lower mortality in the MGB group” “Sleeve Higher Rate GERD”
  • 65. Obes Surg. 2017 Nov 3. Revisional Gastric Bypass for Failed Restrictive Procedures: Comparison of Single-Anastomosis (Mini-) and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Almalki OM1, • May 2001 to December 2015, a total of 116 patients with • failed restrictive bariatric operations • underwent laparoscopic revisional bypass surgery (81 R-MGB and 35 R-RNY). • R-RNY had significantly longer operative times than R-MGB. • R-MGB was shown to be a simpler procedure with better weight reduction than R-RNY
  • 67. MGB Billroth II Rx Diabetes
  • 68. • Simple • Elegant • Effective • Durable > 15 yrs • Powerful • Tailored to Patient • Reversible • Revisable
  • 70. Diabetes and the “Metabolic Surgeon” •Diabetes mellitus is reaching epidemic proportions •"The level of morbidity and mortality due to diabetes and its potential complications are enormous, and pose significant healthcare burden"
  • 71. Imagine 20 years of Diabetes • Rx # •finger sticks 29,200 sticks •1 med 4/d 29,200 tabs •2 meds 6tabs/d 43,800 tabs •Insulin 2/d 14,600 injections
  • 72. Imagine 20 years of Diabetes •Blindness •Heart Attack •Stroke •Death •Renal Failure •Amputation
  • 73. Imagine 20 years of Diabetes •Blindness •Heart Attack •Stroke •Death •Renal Failure •Amputation
  • 74. Imagine 20 years of Diabetes •Blindness •Heart Attack •Stroke •Death •Renal Failure •Amputation
  • 75. Imagine 20 years of Diabetes •Blindness •Heart Attack •Stroke •Death •Renal Failure •Amputation
  • 76. Imagine 20 years of Diabetes •Blindness •Heart Attack •Stroke •Death •Renal Failure •Amputation
  • 77. Imagine 20 years of Diabetes •Blindness •Heart Attack •Stroke •Death •Renal Failure •Amputation
  • 78. Imagine 20 years of Diabetes •Blindness •Heart Attack •Stroke •Death •Renal Failure •Amputation
  • 79. Imagine 20 years of Diabetes •Imagine! •If Diabetes could be cured or Major Improvement •20-30 Minutes •1-2 days in Hospital
  • 80. USA Obesity / Diabetes Epidemic Costs $2 Trillion a Year
  • 83. Burden of diabetes mellitus estimated with a longitudinal population-based study Research Center on Public Health, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
  • 86. Surgery Can Successfully Treat Obesity and Diabetes But Imagine Improvement or Even Cure in the Both the Obese And the Thin Diabetic Patient
  • 87. •A new perspective on an old surgical method •A systematic review and meta-analysis General Surgery Billroth II in Type 2 Diabetes •Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015
  • 88. • General Surgery Studies show that • Subtotal gastrectomy for cancer or ulcers + • Billroth II (BII) >> Billroth I (BI) • More effective Rx Type 2 Diabetes • BII (MGB) More Effective Rx BI (Sleeve) •Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015
  • 89. Billroth II is a Good Procedure! “May be the Ideal Rx Thin Diabetics!”
  • 90. •“Conclusions: BII reconstruction after subtotal gastrectomy for cancer or ulcers more effectively improved T2D than BI reconstruction.” •“Billroth II provides a treatment strategy for diabetic patients and enable metabolic surgery for Non-obese patients Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015
  • 91. The Future Metabolic Surgery Metabolic surgeons Lower Weight Diabetics • What is our future? • METABOLIC SURGERY • We are “Metabolic Surgeons”
  • 92. The Future Already HERE Metabolic Surgery Lower Weight Diabetics 2/3 MGB Surgeons are Doing METABOLIC SURGERY on thin diabetics We are “Metabolic Surgeons”
  • 95. Bariatric Surgery in Thin Diabetics It is Already here!
  • 96. RNY in Thin Diabetics Bad Outcomes