Modelling the development of practice: Views of the archive through ontologies
1 like231 views
The document discusses the development of practice views of archives through ontologies, focusing on the definition and organization of entities related to archival documents and creators. It highlights the significance of ontology in representing knowledge and understanding the historical context of art practices. Additionally, it suggests that such ontological frameworks can improve the quality of research questions posed in various domains, including spatial design.
Modelling the development of practice: Views of the archive through ontologies
- 1. Modelling the development of practice Views of the archive through ontologies Athanasios Velios - @a_velios Musing inside... SYSTEMS – 8 Nov 2016
- 4. Heritage conservation ● conserving objects ● documenting objects recording evidence→
- 5. © The Trustees of the Natural History Museum, London
- 6. Heritage conservation ● conserving objects ● documenting objects recording evidence→ → recording conclusions from evidence
- 8. Heritage conservation ● conserving objects ● documenting objects recording evidence→ → recording conclusions from evidence → representing knowledge
- 11. Archiving ● organising papers ● documenting objects recording evidence→ → recording conclusions from evidence → representing knowledge
- 12. evidence
- 13. knowledge
- 14. Reality
- 15. Reality Model of reality Archival document Person hascreator
- 16. Reality Model of reality Database from model Archival document Person hascreator JLA.2.35 John Latham hascreator
- 17. Reality Model of reality Database from model Archival document Person hascreator JLA.2.2467 Tate Gallery hascreator
- 24. Build an ontology ● Define entities (concepts) archival document – person – creator – etc.
- 25. Build an ontology ● Define entities (concepts) archival document – person – creator – etc. ● Define properties of entities i.e. what makes an entity different from another
- 26. Build an ontology ● Define entities (concepts) archival document – person – creator – etc. ● Define properties of entities i.e. what makes an entity different from another person : creator
- 27. Build an ontology ● Define entities (concepts) archival document – person – creator – etc. ● Define properties of entities i.e. what makes an entity different from another person : creator has first name haslastnam e has date of birth has created has modified
- 28. Build an ontology ● Define entities (concepts) archival document – person – creator – etc. ● Define properties of entities ● Organise entities hierarchically
- 29. Build an ontology ● Define entities (concepts) archival document – person – creator – etc. ● Define properties of entities ● Organise entities hierarchically creator person group organisation
- 33. E2-Temporal Entity E4--Period E5---Event E7----Activity E11-----Modification E12------Production E79------Part Addition E13-----Attribute Assignment E65-----Creation E63----Beginning of Existence E12-----Production E65-----Creation E64----End of Existence E77-Persistent Item E70--Thing E72---Legal Object E18----Physical Thing E24-----Physical Man-Made Thing E90 ----Symbolic Object E71---Man-Made Thing E24----Physical Man-Made Thing E28----Conceptual Object E89-----Propositional Object E30------Right E73------Information Object E90-----Symbolic Object E41------Appellation E73------Information Object E55-----Type E39--Actor E74---Group E52-Time-Span E53-Place E54-Dimension
- 34. E2-Temporal Entity E4--Period E5---Event E7----Activity E11-----Modification E12------Production E79------Part Addition E13-----Attribute Assignment E65-----Creation E63----Beginning of Existence E12-----Production E65-----Creation E64----End of Existence E77-Persistent Item E70--Thing E72---Legal Object E18----Physical Thing E24-----Physical Man-Made Thing E90 ----Symbolic Object E71---Man-Made Thing E24----Physical Man-Made Thing E28----Conceptual Object E89-----Propositional Object E30------Right E73------Information Object E90-----Symbolic Object E41------Appellation E73------Information Object E55-----Type E39--Actor E74---Group E52-Time-Span E53-Place E54-Dimension
- 35. Connections through events ● people ● places ● time ● objects – used – produced documents now located in an→ archive
- 37. Handwritten notes regarding the Niddrie as the process sculpture
- 40. Original author/ document Document photocopied Annotations added – new author 14/11/1979 + 1 week + 3 months
- 41. Original author/ document Document photocopied Annotations added – new author Other events – later years 14/11/1979 + 1 week + 3 months
- 42. production of original production of photocopy modified object Other events – later years P108:has produced P4:hastime span P4:hastimespan P149:identifiedby P4:hastime span 14/11/1979 21/11/1979 14/2/1980 P14:carriedoutby P14:carriedoutby John Latham EveningNews docid: 1562 E12 Production E12 Production E11 Modification
- 44. Gino Ballantyne: As Long as the Band Plays and Everyone Marches in Step
- 45. Reality
- 46. Reality Model of reality W3C PROV
- 47. Reality Model of reality W3C PROV Database from model Artivity
- 57. Gino Ballantyne: As Long as the Band Plays and Everyone Marches in Step
- 60. Gino Ballantyne: As Long as the Band Plays and Everyone Marches in Step
- 61. (wifi – GPS data)
- 62. Gino Ballantyne: As Long as the Band Plays and Everyone Marches in Step
- 63. Potential answers ● One artist over time – development of work – development of technique ● Many artists – overview of current trends – in an organisation/studio/class/department ● Many artists over time – Trends in digital arts over time – Trends in methods and online research
- 64. Final comments ● Ontology development is a good way to test our understanding of the world we research
- 65. Final comments ● Ontology development is a good way to test our understanding of the world we research ● Understanding the model allows you to ask better questions
- 66. Final comments ● Ontology development is a good way to test our understanding of the world we research ● Understanding the model allows you to ask better questions ● Is there an ontology for spatial design?