SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Prioritized Machining
Sequence Optimization
Framework
Javid Mahmoudzadeh Akherat
•  Ph.D. Candidate, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Illinois Institute of Technology
Specialized in optimization and modeling
•  Optimization of machining sequence in Genoa plant
Operations Research, Team work!
•  Joining the R&D in TEXTRON family
Assuming leadership/management roles in the future
•  Implementation of pure mathematics concepts to the world of manufacturing
Filling the gap between academia and industry
•  More interactions/communication with other intern projects
Objective:
•  Optimization of machining sequence in a high-mix, low-volume facility that takes
up to 100 parts on a machine, via a dynamic system
Methodology:
•  Setup time = Tool change over time + Bar stock (raw material) change over time
•  Computer Aided Process Planning:
Traveling Salesman Problem solved with Genetic Algorithm
Brute	
  Force	
  
• Long	
  
Computa-on	
  
-mes,	
  
infeasible!	
  
Nearest	
  Neighbor	
  	
  
Algorithm	
  	
  
• Local	
  op-mum,	
  
not	
  a	
  global	
  
op-miza-on.	
  	
  
Gene6c	
  Algorithm	
  
• Finds	
  the	
  
op-mal	
  
sequence	
  with	
  
reasonable	
  
computa-on.	
  
Results:
•  An intelligent, dynamic framework
•  Optimized, prioritized setups with minimal tool/bar stock change over	
  
Implementation – Observations:
61	
  
57	
  
70	
  
45	
  
74	
  
47	
  
79	
  
58	
  
Eurotech	
  	
   Nakamura	
  
Week	
  25	
  
Week	
  26	
  
Week	
  27	
  
Week	
  28	
  
Up#me	
  %	
  
Part	
  Quality	
  Issue	
  
83	
  
85	
   85	
  
89	
  
76.5	
  
81	
  
67.5	
  
65	
  
70	
  
75	
  
80	
  
85	
  
90	
  
95	
   Monthly	
  Average	
  Setup	
  Time	
  (Min)	
  
Eurotech	
  
8259	
  
Week	
  1	
  	
  
(4	
  setups)	
  
Week	
  2	
  	
  
(5	
  setups)	
  
Week	
  3	
  	
  
(No	
  setups)	
  
Week	
  4	
  
(6	
  setups)	
  
Savings:	
  90	
  
min	
  
Savings:	
  60	
  	
  
min	
   -­‐	
  
Savings:	
  196	
  
min	
  
Nakamura	
  
7743	
  
Week	
  1	
   Week	
  2	
  	
  
(5	
  setups)	
  
Week	
  3	
  	
  
(2	
  setups)	
  
Week	
  4	
  
(6	
  setups)	
  
Missing	
  material	
  
+	
  Tools	
  
Savings:	
  30	
  
min	
  
Savings:	
  30	
  
min	
  
-­‐	
  
Machine	
  Time	
  Savings	
  

More Related Content

PPTX
Process planning
PPT
026 Fast React-Productivity improvement
DOCX
PPT
Completed & Current LSS Projects
PPTX
Actionable information 2
PPT
motion study
DOCX
Troy Schlegel- Accomplishments
PDF
Motion and time study
Process planning
026 Fast React-Productivity improvement
Completed & Current LSS Projects
Actionable information 2
motion study
Troy Schlegel- Accomplishments
Motion and time study

What's hot (6)

PPTX
Time study
PPTX
5.2 DMADOV Phase.pptx
PPTX
Faciliity Layout
PPTX
PDF
Presentation on operation scheduling
PPTX
2.2 Mesure Phase (1).pptx
Time study
5.2 DMADOV Phase.pptx
Faciliity Layout
Presentation on operation scheduling
2.2 Mesure Phase (1).pptx
Ad

Similar to MODIFIED Final Presentation - JAVID (20)

PDF
Job Shop Scheduling with Setup Times Release times and Deadlines
PDF
E43062837
PDF
CIM report - final
PDF
CIM Report
PDF
CIM report - final
PDF
A case study on Machine scheduling and sequencing using Meta heuristics
PDF
A case study on Machine scheduling and sequencing using Meta heuristics
PPTX
A simulation study of fms tool
PPT
kiran
PDF
Bo24437446
PDF
A review on non traditional algorithms for job shop scheduling
PPTX
Impementing cellular manufacturing
PDF
Performance of metaheuristic methods for loop
PPTX
2010 IIE/Rockwell Student Simulation Competition
PPTX
TMA Module 2........................................................
PDF
Parallel Line and Machine Job Scheduling Using Genetic Algorithm
PDF
A MULTI-POPULATION BASED FROG-MEMETIC ALGORITHM FOR JOB SHOP SCHEDULING PROBLEM
PPT
Amts Presentation
PPT
PDF
Operation Sequencing and Machining Parameter Selection in CAPP for Cylindrica...
Job Shop Scheduling with Setup Times Release times and Deadlines
E43062837
CIM report - final
CIM Report
CIM report - final
A case study on Machine scheduling and sequencing using Meta heuristics
A case study on Machine scheduling and sequencing using Meta heuristics
A simulation study of fms tool
kiran
Bo24437446
A review on non traditional algorithms for job shop scheduling
Impementing cellular manufacturing
Performance of metaheuristic methods for loop
2010 IIE/Rockwell Student Simulation Competition
TMA Module 2........................................................
Parallel Line and Machine Job Scheduling Using Genetic Algorithm
A MULTI-POPULATION BASED FROG-MEMETIC ALGORITHM FOR JOB SHOP SCHEDULING PROBLEM
Amts Presentation
Operation Sequencing and Machining Parameter Selection in CAPP for Cylindrica...
Ad

MODIFIED Final Presentation - JAVID

  • 2. Javid Mahmoudzadeh Akherat •  Ph.D. Candidate, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Illinois Institute of Technology Specialized in optimization and modeling •  Optimization of machining sequence in Genoa plant Operations Research, Team work! •  Joining the R&D in TEXTRON family Assuming leadership/management roles in the future •  Implementation of pure mathematics concepts to the world of manufacturing Filling the gap between academia and industry •  More interactions/communication with other intern projects
  • 3. Objective: •  Optimization of machining sequence in a high-mix, low-volume facility that takes up to 100 parts on a machine, via a dynamic system Methodology: •  Setup time = Tool change over time + Bar stock (raw material) change over time •  Computer Aided Process Planning: Traveling Salesman Problem solved with Genetic Algorithm Brute  Force   • Long   Computa-on   -mes,   infeasible!   Nearest  Neighbor     Algorithm     • Local  op-mum,   not  a  global   op-miza-on.     Gene6c  Algorithm   • Finds  the   op-mal   sequence  with   reasonable   computa-on.   Results: •  An intelligent, dynamic framework •  Optimized, prioritized setups with minimal tool/bar stock change over  
  • 4. Implementation – Observations: 61   57   70   45   74   47   79   58   Eurotech     Nakamura   Week  25   Week  26   Week  27   Week  28   Up#me  %   Part  Quality  Issue   83   85   85   89   76.5   81   67.5   65   70   75   80   85   90   95   Monthly  Average  Setup  Time  (Min)   Eurotech   8259   Week  1     (4  setups)   Week  2     (5  setups)   Week  3     (No  setups)   Week  4   (6  setups)   Savings:  90   min   Savings:  60     min   -­‐   Savings:  196   min   Nakamura   7743   Week  1   Week  2     (5  setups)   Week  3     (2  setups)   Week  4   (6  setups)   Missing  material   +  Tools   Savings:  30   min   Savings:  30   min   -­‐   Machine  Time  Savings