Module11.ppst5.2.2

MODULE11
1
Monitor and evaluate learner progress and achievement
using learner attainment data

PPST RESOURCE PACKAGE
ii
INTRODUCTION TO TEACHER RESOURCE PACKAGE
I am Teacher Jen!
And I am Teacher Mike!
We are members of your support group. Together with
your principal, master teacher, and co-teachers, we are
pleased to be your guides and companions as you walk
through the modules.
Are you ready?
We begin by letting you know how the journey started for
us in putting together this resource package.
In August 2017, Department of Education Secretary
Leonor Briones signed the Philippine Professional Standards
for Teachers (PPST) into policy through DepEd Order No.
42, S. 2017. The policy states, among others, that the PPST
“shall be used as a basis for all learning and development
programs for teachers.”
The Department of Education is committed to supporting
your continuing professional development. This resource
package hopes to contribute to this commitment.
As a teacher, understanding the PPST is crucial in order
for you to grow and flourish in your profession. The PPST
identifies what you are expected to know, be able to do, and
value in your profession.
“
These modules
are standalone
sections that
you can select
based on your
needs and
interests. This
means that
you can choose
and read any
module that is
most relevant
to you. You can
take your time
in familiarizing
yourself
with any one
module with
no pressure to
finish reading
all 12.

MODULE11
iii
Introduction to Teacher Resource Package
This resource package:
• serves as your guidebook towards becoming better acquainted with the PPST;
• comprises 12 modules corresponding to the 12 indicators that are aligned with
the Results-based Performance Management System (RPMS); and
• contains illustrative and instructive information that you will find realistic,
sensible and workable and can help you achieve the target indicators across
curriculum teaching areas and key stages of learners’ education.
We are happy to say that this resource package has been created and compiled by
teachers in support of other teachers.
You will find the materials here useful if you:
• reflect on your own classroom practices, and ensure that your teaching
practices are aligned with the indicators;
• want to mentor beginning teachers so they become better in their practice;
• are a part of a group of teachers who need materials for your school-
based Learning Action Cell (LAC) sessions in order to (i) learn more about
the PPST and (ii) innovate on practices using the samples in the resource
material as guide; and
• want to develop or expand the current work by (i) providing more examples
of practices or (ii) working on other career stages or indicators other than
the 12 presented in this package.
If learning is your passion,
this resource package is for you.

iv

What can you expect to find in each module?
You will discover that each module discusses a specific
indicator, defines its key concepts and provides relevant
illustrations of practice that may help you understand and attain
the indicator.
The modules explore the following indicators:
1.1.2 Apply knowledge of content within and
across curriculum teaching areas.
MODULE 1
1.4.2 Use a range of teaching strategies
that enhance learner achievement in
literacy and numeracy skills.
MODULE 2
1.5.2 Apply a range of teaching strategies
to develop critical and creative thinking, as
well as other higher-order thinking skills.
MODULE 3
2.3.2 Manage classroom structure to
engage learners, individually or in groups,
in meaningful exploration, discovery and
hands-on activities within a range of
physical learning environments.
MODULE 4
2.6.2 Manage learner behavior
constructively by applying positive and
non-violent discipline to ensure learning-
focused environments.
MODULE 5
3.1.2 Use differentiated, developmentally
appropriate learning experiences
to address learners’ gender, needs,
strengths, interests and experiences.
MODULE 6
4.1.2 Plan, manage and implement
developmentally sequenced teaching and
learning processes to meet curriculum
requirements through various teaching
contexts.
MODULE 7
4.4.2 Participate in collegial discussions
that use teacher and learner feedback to
enrich teaching practice.
MODULE 8
4.5.2 Select, develop, organize and
use appropriate teaching and learning
resources, including ICT, to address
learning goals.
MODULE 9
5.1.2 Design, select, organize and use
diagnostic, formative and summative
assessment strategies consistent with
curriculum requirements.
MODULE 10
5.2.2 Monitor and evaluate learner
progress and achievement using learner
attainment data.
MODULE 11
5.4.2 Communicate promptly and
clearly the learners’ needs, progress
and achievement to key stakeholders,
including parents/guardians.
MODULE 12
“

MODULE11
v
Introduction to Teacher Resource Package
The module contains the following parts:
“
PARTS OF THE MODULES
OVERVIEW introduces you to the
indicator and why you need to
achieve the indicator;
SELF-REFLECTION allows you
to reflect on your knowledge,
skills and attitude related to the
indicator;
KEY CONCEPTS defines key
concepts pertinent to the
indicator;
SUPPORT GROUP allows you to
consult and collaborate with our
teacher-friends who will provide
suggestions on how to improve
your current practice;
ILLUSTRATIONS OF PRACTICE
walks you through sample
illustrations of specific teaching
practices that show how the
Standards are put into action;
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
PLAN helps you identify your
strengths and development
needs and plans for specific
action for professional
development; and
RESOURCE LIBRARY provides
you with resources (which may
include bibliography, forms,
templates, appendices and
links) that can help you further
understand the indicator.
Each module takes you through a journey of exploration and discovery, while you learn more
about the indicator and you apply it in your teaching context.
We encourage you to actively engage with the text as you read through the module.
We hope you find the information, materials and resources in this package helpful as you engage
with the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers towards your professional development.
“We, Teacher Jen and Teacher Mike, will
be with you every step of the way.
Have a happy journey.

01
11
MONITOR AND EVALUATE
LEARNER PROGRESS AND
ACHIEVEMENT USING LEARNER
ATTAINMENT DATA
MODULE
INTRODUCTION
OVERVIEW
KEY CONCEPTS
SELF-REFLECTION
SUPPORT GROUP
- Probing
- Suggestions for Improvement
- Illustration of Practice No. 1: MONITORING
LEARNER’S PERFORMANCE THROUGH PORTFOLIO
ASSESSMENT
- Illustration of Practice No. 2: EVALUATING LEANER
ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH ANALYSIS OF TEST
- Illustration of Practice No. 3: MONITORING
AND EVALUATING LEARNERS’ READING AND
PROGRESS AND ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH PHIL-IRI
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
RESOURCE LIBRARY
- Annotated Bibliography
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
2
ii
3
4
5
10
24
25
CONTENTS
26

2
“
Hello! Welcome to Module 11. I am Teacher Jen and with
me is Teacher Mike. Together, we will walk you through this
module.
You are about to explore various strategies and identify
the whys and hows of monitoring and evaluating your learners’
progress and achievement.
As Proficient Teachers, we are expected to continuously assess and monitor
learners’ performance as part of classroom instruction. This is to determine whether
our instructional strategies are working well for all learners and to identify learners who
need instructional interventions. We also need to evaluate how effective our learning
programs are and what adjustments can be done in the way we teach our learners.
In this module, we will find authentic and instructive illustrations of practice
anchored onn the Philippine Standards for Teachers (PPST) intended to help teachers’
current practice.
In this module, we will focus on:
STRAND: Monitoring and evaluation of learner progress and
achievement
INDICATOR: 5.2.2 Monitor and evaluate learner progress and
achievement using learner attainment data.

MODULE11
3
“
KEY CONCEPTS
Understanding the following key concepts facilitates
deeper appreciation of the indicator and helps you
practice monitoring and evaluation of learner progress
and achievement effectively.
MONITORING. This refers to the continuous and systematic use of data in order to
track learner progress through a variety of forms such as daily learning log, class
record, progress chart, checklist, and anecdotal record. Formative assessment,
checking for understanding, providing feedback, and other strategies that are
not standardized are used to monitor learner progress in order for teachers to
appropriately address misconceptions and other learning problems.
LEARNER ATTAINMENT DATA. This pertains to evidence(s) and results of various
assessments that are used in the monitoring and evaluation of learner progress
and achievement.
EVALUATION. This refers to the periodic and systematic use of assessment forms
and strategies (e.g., quarterly assessments, pretest & posttest) in order to judge
learner achievement; that is, how well the learner has learned the knowledge and/
or skills covered in a unit. Summative assessment, essays, presentation, group
work, performances and standardized tests are used to inform the teachers about
their teaching. Learners are marked on formal evaluation tasks and this mark is
usually part of their report card grade.

4
“
Let us now reflect on our current practice regarding
monitoring and evaluation of learner progress and
achievement using learner attainment data.
Considering the key concepts, I have written down my
own reflection on this.
SELF-REFLECTION
…the various ways on how
to monitor and evaluate
my learners’ progress and
achievement based on
learner attainment data.
…monitor and evaluate
learners’ progress and
achievement based on data
using various strategies.
…the need to keep and
provide accurate, holistic
and immediate feedback
based on data to guide me
and my learners to the
right track.
As a Proficient Teacher,
I know…
I do…
I feel…
KNOWLEDGE SKILLS ATTITUDES
Good reflection, Jen! Now, it is your turn to reflect on your
knowledge, skills and attitudes in relation to the indicator. You
may write it in the boxes below.
“_________________________
________________________
_________________________
_________________________
_________________________
________________________
_________________________
_________________________
_________________________
__________________.
I know…
I do…
I feel…
KNOWLEDGE SKILLS ATTITUDES
_________________________
________________________
_________________________
_________________________
_________________________
________________________
_________________________
_________________________
_________________________
__________________.
_________________________
________________________
_________________________
_________________________
_________________________
________________________
_________________________
_________________________
_________________________
__________________.

MODULE11
5
“
Welcome to our support group! We always feel great
to help teachers who would like to improve their practices.
Teacher Carla is a Grade 9 teacher of English. She
needs help on how to track her learners’ performance more
effectively.
Let us take a look at the different documents that she
uses to monitor her learners’ performance.
SUPPORT GROUP
1 DAILY LESSON LOG (DLL)
I. OBJECTIVES DAY 1 DAY 2 DAY 3 DAY 4 DAY 5
A. Content
Standards
The learners demonstrate understanding of how Anglo-American literature and other text types serve as means of enhancing
the self; how to use processing, assessing, summarizing information, word derivation and formation strategies, appropriate word
order, punctuations and interjections to enable him/her to participate actively in a speech choir.
B. Performance
Standards
The learner actively participates in a speech choir through using effective verbal and non-verbal strategies based on the
following criteria: Focus, Voice, Delivery, Facial Expression, Body Movements/ Gestures and Audience Contact.
C. Learning
Competencies/
Objectives
(Write the LC
Code for each)
EN9LC-Ic-3.12:
Paraphrase the text
listened to
EN9V-Ic-15: Explain how
words are derived from
names of persons and
places
EN9LT-Ic-14: Analyze
literature as a means of
enhancing the self
EN9VC-Id-21:
Summarize the
contents of the material
viewed
EN9RC-Ii-18: Identify
advance organizers,
titles, subtitles,
illustrations, etc.
given in a text
DAY 1 DAY 2 DAY 3 DAY 4 DAY 5
J. Additional
activities for
application or
remediation
-Guided reading for
instructional and frustrated
readers
-Use of creative/localized
reading materials to
motivate the learners to
read
V. REMARKS
VI. REFLECTION
A. Number of
learners who
earned 80% in the
evaluation
Innovativeness= 30
Awareness= 47
Ingenuity= 30
Sincerity= 50
Innovativeness =30
Awareness = 47
Ingenuity= 30
Sincerity= 50
Innovativeness = 30
Awareness = 42
Ingenuity = 30
SinceritY = 40
Innovativeness = 30
Awareness = 47
Ingenuity= 30
Sincerity= 50
Innovativeness = 30
Awareness = 47
Ingenuity= 30
Sincerity= 50
B. Number. of
learners who require
additional activities
for remediation who
scored below 80%
Innovativeness= 0
Awareness= 0
Ingenuity= 0
Sincerity= 0
Innovativeness= 0
Awareness= 0
Ingenuity= 0
Sincerity= 0
Innovativeness = 0
Awareness = 5
Ingenuity= 0
Sincerity= 10
Innovativeness= 0
Awareness= 0
Ingenuity= 0
Sincerity= 0
Innovativeness= 0
Awareness= 0
Ingenuity= 0
Sincerity= 0
C. Did the remedial
lessons work?
Number of learners
who have caught up
with the lesson
(remedial lesson was not
needed)
needed)
Yes, the remedial lessons
worked. There are 5
learners in Awareness and
10 in Sincerity who have
caught up with the lesson.
needed)
needed)
Part VI of the daily lesson log is the “Reflection” which tracks
the following: i) number of learners who passed in the formative
assessment; ii) number of learners who required additional activities
for monitoring; and iii) number of learners who have caught up with
lessons among others.

6
Teacher Carla has one learner who missed taking a
summative assessment and doing a performance task due to
non-attendance during the remaining days of the first quarter.
The learner failed to report to class despite the interventions
given. This is a strong indication for the teacher to have a close
monitoring of the learner’s performance in the succeeding
grading periods.
“
Electronic Class Record (ECR)
“
The sample presented on the previous page is a daily lesson log for a
week. It shows the lesson for each day with the index of mastery computed
accurately. The index of mastery contains the learner attainment data
that measure the learners’ mastery level of the competency. It guides the
teachers in their instruction and allows them to determine whether the
learners are ready to proceed to the next lesson, or if they need additional
activities for remediation. Likewise, the teacher may also use the data
to modify or adjust her instruction in order to address the needs of her
learners.
Now, let me introduce you to the other documents that you
may use to monitor and evaluate the learners’ progress and
achievement.
The electronic class record, including the grading sheet and
summary of quarterly grades, allows the teacher to monitor
individually the learner attainment data per specific learning area
and assesses whether the learner passed or failed. With this tool,
the teacher can clearly assess the progress and achievement
of each learner and can provide him or her with instructional
intervention or enrichment.
“

MODULE11
7
With close monitoring
of the learner who
underperforms, the
teacher was able to
successfully exhaust
all efforts to improve
the learner’s progress
and performance as
shown by the learner
attainment data across
grading periods.
Grading Sheet
Summary of Quarterly Grades
Teachers must take extra care in using this type of electronic tool
since unnecessary actions, like deleting rows or columns, may alter the
whole data and report learner attainment inaccurately.
“Progress Chart
Teacher Carla also
uses a progress chart to
to monitor her learners’
progress quarterly based
on class average. The
chart helps her to have
a general assessment of
her learners’ progress
and to design activities
appropriate to their level
of proficiency.

8
“
These forms, particularly the DLL and ECR, used by
Teacher Carla are provided by the school. Templates
are also available for download in DepEd websites. The
templates can easily be modified using Word File or Excel
Spreadsheet. The progress chart, on the other hand, can
be replicated using the mentioned computer programs.
Always feel free to ask for technical assistance from your
teacher-friends in using, modifying, or creating these forms.
What kind of forms were given and how were they used?1
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
Did the documents suit different learners? Why or why not?
2
How could these documents help teachers monitor the progress and evaluate
the achievement of their learners?
3
Looking closely at the given samples, please
try to answer and reflect on the questions
presented below.
Probing
If you were to monitor and evaluate your learners’ progress and achievement, how would you do it?
4
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
“

MODULE11
9
“
“We acknowledge Teacher Carla for showing us how she tracks her learners’ performance
using learner attainment data computed and described by different monitoring documents. For
us to use these documents more effectively, we may take note of the following suggestions:
Plan monitoring and evaluation activities. Before the school year begins, we may identify
monitoring and evaluation activities to be conducted daily, weekly, quarterly, and yearly. The
documents or school forms needed for these activities may already be prepared and saved in
folders or in the computer.
Monitor and evaluate learners’ performance regularly and consistently. A day without
monitoring and evaluation may cause us to miss serious problems in the learners’ learning.
If left unchecked, this will certainly hamper the learners’ academic success. Monitoring and
evaluating learners’ performance religiously according to plan is the best way to avoid potential
problems in the process.
Explore varied monitoring and evaluation documents. Although our schools provide us with
the standard documents and school forms, such as DLL and ECR, we can always find or create
additional ones that can help us in the monitoring and evaluation process. For instance, we
may also use a daily checklist to track our learners’ performance. A daily progress chart, not
just quarterly, may give us immediate information about the learners’ achievement of the daily
target so as to provide a prompt intervention. Another strategy is to have an anecdotal record
of each learner in order to gain a more individualized assessment of the learner’s progress.
Validate monitoring and evaluation documents to ensure accuracy of learner attainment data.
A number of monitoring and evaluation documents maybe used. However, we must ensure
that these documents are validated and reliable such as those provided by DepEd. Do some
research and testing of the assessment documents before using them so that the learners are
evaluated accurately and fairly.
Involve the learners in certain types of monitoring and evaluation. Monitoring and evaluation
is definitely hard work especially for teachers handling large classes. As a strategy, we may
also instruct our learners to have group or peer monitoring within the class and check their
progress weekly. This may help the learners become more conscious of the quality of their
performance and aim for a higher achievement.
Suggestions for Improvement
Youaredoingawonderfuljob!Hereareoursuggestions
for you to further enrich your current practice.
Great suggestions! We hope that these can help you and other
teachers, too!
To guide you in the monitoring and evaluation of learner progress
and achievement, we have provided several teaching practices in the
next section.

10
“Teacher Mike and I will now walk you through the different
illustrations of practice that provide multiple opportunities in
monitoring and evaluating learners’ performance.
To give us a jump-start in tackling PPST indicator 5.2.2,
here is a preliminary illustration of practice:
Most teachers monitor learner progress informally, that is, they may not always
record their impressions in any formal way or undertake more formal tasks. Monitoring
and evaluating learner progress and achievement will only be effective if done religiously,
systematically and accurately. In this line, the table below presents a year-round plan of
monitoring and evaluation practices done by teachers:
Pretest /Diagnostic Test
First
Quarter
MONITORING AND EVALUATION DOCUMENTS/STRATEGIESACTIVITY
Pretest Paper with Table of Specifications (TOS),
Frequency of Scores, Pre-reading Assessment Tools
QUARTER
Profiling of the Learners Learner’s Profile Form, Interest Surveys
Formative and Summative
Assessments
Daily Lesson Log, Written Works, Performance Tasks,
Rubrics, E-Class Record, Progress Chart, Portfolio,
Checklist, Anecdotal Record
Quarterly Assessment 1st Quarter Assessment with TOS, Test Item Analysis
Final Performance Task, Rubric
E-Class Record, Grade Sheets, Consolidation of Grades
in All Learning Areas
Second
Quarter
Assessments
Quarterly Assessment 2nd Quarter Assessment with TOS, Test Item Analysis
Culminating Task Final Performance Task, Rubric
Computation of Grades E-Class Record, Grade Sheets, Summary of Quarterly
Grades, Consolidation of Grades in All Learning Areas
Culminating Task
Computation of Grades
Third
Quarter
Assessments
3rd Quarter Assessment with TOS, Test Item Analysis
Quarterly Assessment
Culminating Task

MODULE11
11
Third
Quarter
Computation of Grades E-Class Record, Grade Sheets, Summary of Quarterly
Grades, Consolidation of Grades in All Learning Areas
MONITORING AND EVALUATION DOCUMENTS/STRATEGIESACTIVITYQUARTER
Fourth
Quarter
Assessments
Written Works, Performance Tasks, Rubrics, E-Class
Record, Progress Chart, Portfolio, Checklist, Anecdotal
Record
4th Quarter Assessment with TOS, Test Item Analysis
Posttest/Achievement
Test
Posttest with TOS, Frequency of Scores, Pretest &
Posttest Results Form with Mean Percent Increase,
Post-reading Assessment and Reading Profile Report
E-Class Record, Grade Sheets, Summary of Quarterly
Grades, Consolidation of Grades in All Learning Areas,
Report on Promotion and Learning Progress and
Achievement
Computation of Grades
“
From among the monitoring and evaluation practices
presented, the following illustrations of practice will give
different opportunities to track and evaluate learner
progress and achievement using learner attainment
data. Teachers may modify these forms, except for the
mandatory school forms prescribed by DepEd, according
to the needs of their learners.
The major purpose of a working portfolio is to serve as a
holding tank for learner work (Danielson & Abrutyn, 2000). A
portfolio may also be used to diagnose learners’ needs. Both
learners and teachers should have evidence of the learners’
strengths and weaknesses in achieving learning objectives.
This type of assessment allows teachers to be more accurate
in evaluating learners’ mastery of the content.
Monitoring Learner’s Performance through
Portfolio Assessment
ILLUSTRATION OF PRACTICE NO. 1:
Quarterly Assessment
Culminating Task
“
1.1 Portfolio Assessment and Checklist (Monitoring)

12
“
The contents of a
portfolio vary based
on its type (working,
display, or assessment).
This should be
communicated clearly
to the learners.
Learners can access their
portfolios regularly by hanging
them on a specific spot in the
classroom or by keeping them in
shelves and safety lockers.
From a teacher’s perspective, a portfolio can provide a holistic
evaluation of the learners’ written language proficiency. These
products or outputs can be used as concrete evidence and as bases
for teachers’ instructional decisions because they provide learners’
general and individual performance.
For the learners, a portfolio can serve as tool for self-reflection.
Questions like, “What have I learned?’” “What do I still need to
learn?” and “How can I get through it?” can be provided to learners
as reflection guides for their own learning.
Below are sample portfolios with the learners’ outputs:
“
You may let
your learners
note the following
tips to help
them produce a
well-organized
portfolio:
1. Start gathering documents/outputs at the
beginning of the school year.
2. Collect all documents/outputs in the
portfolio.
3. Check/monitor the completeness of
the needed contents of the portfolio by
preparing a checklist.
4. Keep your portfolio simple yet
presentable.
HOW TO DO IT?
?

MODULE11
13
Learner Name Portfolio
Localized
Materials
Journalistic
Writings
Reflection of
Activities
Movie Analysis
Learner 1 / / / x
Learner 2 x / / x
Learner 3 / / / x
Learner 4 / / / /
Learner 5 / x / /
Learner 6 / x x /
Learner 7 x / x /
Learner 8 / / x /
Learner 9 x / x /
If properly utilized, a portfolio assessment can help
teachers monitor and evaluate their learners’ progress and
achievement effectively.
Here are some suggestions on how we can maximize the use of
learners’ portfolio.
1. Communicate clearly to the learners the objectives and rubric for
the portfolio.
2. Ensure that the collected works of learners are related to the
learning objectives. With this, sufficient work must be collected to
provide ample evidence of learners’ achievement.
3. The teacher may provide an individual record of the learner for him
or her to monitor his or her own progress weekly.
4. Keep a daily checklist of each learner’s outputs. The checklist shows
all the portfolio requirements for a particular grading period with the
names of each learner.
5. Monitor the completeness of the portfolio. If the work is not complete,
the learner may be given a chance to finish it.
6. Review and evaluate the component and items in the portfolios to
determine whether the learners complied with the requirements.
HOW TO DO IT?
?
“
“
Teachers may keep track of their learners’ outputs by
using a daily checklist. The checklist shows all the portfolio
requirements (e.g., localized materials, journalistic writings,

14
“Scoring guides or rubrics with clear criteria and descriptions
of different levels of performance must also be developed and
communicated clearly to the learners. The content must be
focused and documented.
Compilation of learners’ achievement data in the portfolio
defeats its purpose if learners are only graded for their
compliance. They must be informed about their own progress
through the portfolio. Learners should have regular access to
their portfolio. Those portfolio should also contain a copy of
rubrics given by the teacher.
1.2 Assessment Rubric (Evaluation)
Rubric as an assessment tool has two types: holistic and
analytic. The type of rubric to be used in assessing learners’ output
or performance depends on the objectives and type of the activity.
The sample portfolio assessment rubrics presented in this
module may be modified or may serve as basis for developing your
own, to suit your learners’ needs and learning objectives.
“Analytic Rubric - Each criterion (dimension, trait) is evaluated separately.
Excellent (4 points) Good (3 points) Fair (2 points) Poor (1 point) Unsatisfactory
(0 point)
Requirements
x 4
All artifacts are present. 7 artifacts are present 5-6 artifacts are present. 4 or fewer artifacts are
present.
No work submitted.
Completion
Level x 2
All work is completed fully
and on time.
Portfolio contains
adequate amount of
completed work.
Portfolio contains fair
amount of completed
work.
Portfolio contains
inadequate amount of
work.
No work submitted.
Writing (Writing
Process)
x 4
All 3 journals and OERs are
present with evidence of the
writing process (brainstorm,
rough draft.)
Portfolio contains 2
pieces of work with evi-
dence of writing process
(brainstorm, rough draft)
Portfolio contains one
piece of work with
evidence of the writing
process (brainstorm,
rough draft)
Portfolio does not
show evidence of the
writing process in its
journal and OERs
No work submitted.
Organization x 1 Portfolio is very neat and
logically organized.
Portfolio is mostly neat
and logically organized.
Portfolio is not very
neat and/or lacks
professionalism Excellent
(4 points)
Portfolio is not neat
and/or work is sloppy
and unprofessional in
appearance
No work submitted.
Knowledge
Displayed
x 4
Portfolio demonstrates a
master of knowledge in
subject area
Portfolio demonstrates
advanced knowledge in
subject area.
basic understanding of
knowledge in subject area
an approaching basic
understanding of
knowledge in subject
area.
No work submitted.
In this specific sample rubric, the points received by a learner
based on the indicator met are multiplied by the weight of the
corresponding criterion. For example, a learner who gets 3 points
(Good) in ‘Requirements’ will have his or her score multiplied by 4
which equals to 12 points, and so on with the rest of the criteria.

MODULE11
15
Holistic Rubric - All criteria (dimensions, traits) are evaluated simultaneously.
If the learner...Score
includes a piece of work for each item on the checklist that clearly
meets the criteria suggested; writes a short paragraph about each
item, weaves a connection between the pieces and describing
what was learned; shows reflection about his or her thinking and
learning over time.
5
includes a piece of work for each item on the checklist; writes a
short paragraph about each item; is somewhat reflective of how
his or her thinking has changed.
4
includes a piece of work for each item; writes something about
each piece.
3
includes a piece of work for most items; writes little about the
pieces of work2
does not complete the task or gives information that has nothing
to do with the work chosen.1
Item analysis is a process which examines learner
responses to individual test items in order to assess the
quality of each test item and of the test as a whole. This is
to improve test items and to enhance the teacher’s skills in
test construction, and to identify specific areas which need
improvement.
An effective item analysis starts from a carefully
written test based on the table of specifications (TOS). The
competencies covered for the grading period are included and
organized according to the domains of learning. The teacher
makes sure that the test construction aligns with the TOS.
Evaluating Leaner Achievement through Analysis of Test
“
2.1 Item Analysis (Evaluation)

16
Percent of class time is
calculated by multiplying the
time spent for the competency
by 100 divided by the total
number of teaching hours for
that quarter.
Example: 4 x 100 = 10
40
Number of items is computed
by multiplying the time spent
for the competency by the total
number of test items divided by
total number of teaching hours
for that quarter.
Example: 4 x 50 = 5
40

MODULE11
17
The contents of the item analysis form are
congruent to the TOS and constructed test.
The data may be easily
computed by entering
the number of correct
responses in an Excel
Spreadsheet and creating
simple formulas in
particular groups of cells.
With the standard set
by the teacher, he or
she will able to gauge
from the item analysis
the competencies that
the learners still need to
master. The items with
low mastery may also
reflect the quality of test
construction.
“
In this example of test item analysis of a Grade 9 class,
you can evaluate the achievement of the class in their
respective learning areas.
You can also determine the least mastered skills or
competencies and evaluate their attainment data. In addition,
you can compare the mastery level of a group of learners
with other groups. You may also change the item that only
a few learners answered correctly which may indicate that
the question is ambiguous or is not part of the learning
competency.
2.2 Frequency Table with Mean Score, Standard Deviation and Mean Percentage (Evaluation)
In addition to item analysis, you may also measure learner
achievement by using a frequency table for pretest and posttest
results.
The mean score, standard deviation, and mean percentage
of pretest and posttest are computed and compared.
“

18
The frequency of scores
is manually entered in
Excel Spreadsheet.
The mean score, standard
deviation, and mean
percentage of pretest and
posttest are automatically
computed for comparison.
Learner achievement is
determined by calculating
the mean score or mean
percentage increase from
pretest to posttest.
“
By analyzing tests results, we can evaluate learner
achievement in several areas. Specific weaknesses of an
individual learner or a class can also be determined using this
approach. The results of item analysis may inform us of the
necessary interventions (e.g. enrichment, activities, reteaching,
remediation) that we can provide to the learners.
Aside from analyzing test results, the following tips may be
useful:
1. Monitor and evaluate learners’ progress and
achievement based on their formative and summative
assessments (written work or performance task) and
determine if they meet the learning goals each week.
2. Include descriptive notes of the learners’ performance
after weekly measurement.
3. Track and evaluate learners’ progress and achievement
using graphs or charts to see if they attain the learning
goals. Write a succinct interpretation of these graphs.

MODULE11
19
“
The information noted by the teacher from the learner
during the pre-reading test will guide him or her in designing or
adjusting classroom, small group or individualized instruction
to fit the learners’ needs and abilities.
Reading is a big challenge for learners and a major
concern for all teachers. Hence, monitoring and evaluating
the reading progress and achievement of learners is requisite.
The Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI)
provides a classroom-based assessment tool that aims to
measure and describe the learners’ reading performance
in both English and Filipino languages in oral reading, silent
reading and listening comprehension.
Phil-IRI is used mandatorily in specific grade levels, but
teachers in other grade levels may also adapt their reading
assessment forms from the Phil-IRI, or use it in combination
with other reliable tools of assessment, as shown in the
following illustration of practice.
Monitoring and Evaluating Learners’ Reading
and Progress and Achievement through Phil-IRI
“
This form is used in
administering the
pre-reading test
(oral/silent) to the
learners.
The teacher notes a
couple of data from
the learner such
as the number and
types of miscues,
attempts to self-
correct, responses
to comprehension
questions, word
recognition and
comprehension levels,
among others.

20
Test Criteria for Word Recognition and Reading Comprehension
(adapted from Phil-IRI)
To compute the word recognition level (WR), the following formula is applied:
WR = (No. of words - No. of miscues) x 100
No. of words
Example: WR = (71 - 11) x 100
71
60 x 100
71
WR = 85
The level of reading comprehension (RC) is computed using the formula below:
WR = Total correct answer x 100
Total no. of questions
Example:
RC = 5 x 100
7
RC = 71
HOW TO DO IT?
?
“
In the example above, a word recognition rating of 85 means
“Frustration” while a reading comprehension rating of 71 means
“Instructional”.
A learner who has word recognition of “Frustration”
and reading comprehension of “Instructional” has an overall
FRUSTRATION reading level.

MODULE11
21
Finally, the teacher conducts a post-reading assessment to determine if there are
improvements in specific difficulties and overall reading level of the learners. He or
she consolidates the reading assessment data of all classes using another table for
analysis.
The teacher makes a report of the reading profile of classes handled. The complete
report presents the pre-reading and post-reading assessment results wherein the
learners’ reading achievement can easily be gauged.
HOW TO DO IT?
?
“
The teacher keeps track of the learners’ reading progress
through continual assessment. This may be effectively done
by setting a developmental plan to address the needs of the
learners.
For example, the learners may be grouped according
to their reading levels and may undergo different reading
programs. Non-readers and frustrated readers may undergo
reading recovery program; instructional readers may go
through reading remediation program, while independent
readers may undertake reading enrichment program. Parents
or guardians of non-readers and frustrated readers will have
to be notified for extra support at home.
3 Reading Profile Report (Evaluation)
The teacher
consolidates the
individual records
of the learners
and groups them
according to reading
level.

22
The assessment serves as one of the bases in planning,
designing/redesigning the reading programs or activities in the
school to improve the overall school reading performance.
“
The teacher uses learner
attainment data to
evaluate the effectiveness
of the reading programs
or activities he or she
conducted and adjusts
instructional strategies to
better meet the learners’
needs.
Report on Promotion and Learning Progress and Achievement
At the end of the school year, teachers make a report on
promotion and learning progress and achievement in accordance
with the policy guidelines on classroom assessment provided by
DepEd.
“
This school
form presents
the learners’
status and
learning
progress and
achievement
based on
their general
average.

MODULE11
23
OTHER ILLUSTRATIONS OF PRACTICE
The teacher regularly (daily or weekly) gives his or her learners assessment activities, such as
quizzes, seat works, group works, performance tasks, among others to test their learners’ progress
and achievement. He or she tracks their progress using available monitoring sheets (e.g. checklist),
and identifies their least mastered skills. The teacher uses graphs or charts to analyze the test results.
He or she modifies the instructional strategies based on the analysis of the learner attainment data.
The teacher keeps a daily checklist of the learners’ outputs. The teacher regularly checks the
portfolio to monitor if the learner is on track. The checklist shows all the portfolio requirements for
the quarter with the names of each learner. The teacher monitors whether the work is complete or
inadequate and whether the portfolio is regularly submitted or not.
The teacher tracks the achievement of learners through achievement chart record. Using the
achievement chart record, the teacher audits the record in a form of checklist, indicating competencies
that the learners successfully achieved.
The teacher uses variety of techniques in tracking the developmental sequences of a learner’s
school and academic status. Variety of techniques includes appropriate utilization of data from class
records and report card through Progress Chart Review or Competency Monitoring Grid.
Having seen how Indicator 5.2.2 can be achieved, you are now
ready to think of strategies or interventions to help your learners attain
their learning goals through the proper use of suitable monitoring and
evaluation tools.
The following table presents a summary of illustrations of practice
that you may also consider in making your teaching practices aligned
with this indicator.
“
Monitoring of learner progress is a practice that helps
teachers use learner attainment data to keep track of learners’
daily performance and acquisition of skills. On the other hand,
evaluation of learner achievement tells teachers whether the
learner has learned the particular skills covered in a unit, but not
whether the learner is learning at a pace that will allow him or her
to meet annual learning goals. This is the key difference between
learner progress monitoring and achievement evaluation, while
both practices help teachers determine the effectiveness of
their teaching and make more informed instructional decisions.
“

24
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
STRENGTHS
What are the skills you are
good at?
DEVELOPMENT NEEDS
What are the skills you
need to improve?
ACTION PLAN
What can you recommend
for your development
intervention?
TIMELINE
When will you implement
your plan?
RESOURCE NEEDED
What assistance/
resources do you need to
implement the plan?
After you have explored the different key concepts on monitoring
and evaluation of learner progress and achievement, you now have
a better appreciation of the indicator. Based on your learning in
this module, think of what you can do to enhance your professional
development.
Fill in the personal action plan below.“
“Happy planning!

MODULE11
25
RESOURCE LIBRARY
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (1997). Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/
publications/books/197171/chapters/The-Types-of-Portfolios.aspx
The author explains the use of portfolio in the classroom, the different types of portfolio, the purpose of
using it inside the classroom to monitor the learner’s progress and the innovative technique of using it.
Bartolata, Blanche M. (2017). Learning Outcome Assessment. GFMNHS-San Francisco Annex.
Danielson, C., & Abrutyn, L. (1997). An introduction to using portfolios in the classroom. Alexandria, Va., USA:
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
This material is a useful resource for teachers who wish to use learner portfolio in the classroom
Department of Education. (2015). Policy Guidelines on Classroom Assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education
Program. Department Order No. 8, s. 2015.
In line with the implementation of the Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013 (Republic Act No. 10533),
the Department of Education is adopting the enclosed Policy Guidelines on Classroom Assessment for the
K to 12 Basic Education Program. Classroom Assessment is an integral part of curriculum implementation.
It allows the teachers to track and measure learners’ progress and to adjust instruction accordingly.
Classroom assessment informs the learners, as well as their parents and guardians, of their progress.
Department of Education. (2018). Policy Guidelines on the Administration of the Revised Philippine Informal
Reading Inventory. Department Order No. 14, s. 2015
This DepEd Order provides the guidelines for the administration of the revised Philippine Informal
Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI). The tool is administered to Grades 3 to 6 learners in public elementary
schools nationwide. It defines the responsibilities of the different levels of governance pertaining to the
dissemination and utilization of the said tool.
Fuchs, L.S. & Fuchs, D. (2002). What is scientifically-based research on progress monitoring? (Technical report).
Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
The author explains how learner progress monitoring improves instruction. The teacher determines
current learner level of performance within the year, identifies achievement goals that the learner needs to
reach at the end of the school year, and establishes the rate of progress the learner must make to meet
those goals.
Learning Science International. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.kyrene.org/cms/lib/AZ01001083/Centricity/
Domain/42/Art%20and%20Science/Enhanced%20Developmental%20Scales/Enhanced_Developmental_
Scale_E2.pdf.
This article explains how the teacher facilitates tracking of learner progress on one or more learning goals
and/or targets using a formative approach to assessment.
Safer, N. & Fleischman, S. (2005). Educational Leadership, 66, 81-83.
These authors explain how learner progress monitoring improves instruction and reiterated that learner
progress monitoring is a practice that helps teachers use performance data to continually evaluate
effectiveness of their teaching.
We also provide you with resources that can help you further
understand the indicator.
“Annotated Bibliography

26
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Leonor Magtolis Briones
Secretary
Department of Education
Allan B. De Guzman, Ph.D.
Luzon Zonal Representative
Rita May P. Tagalog, Ph.D.
Visayas Zonal Representative
Evelyn G. Chavez, Ph.D.
Mindanao Zonal Representative
Lourdes R. Baetiong, Ph.D.
Language Subject Representative
Myrna B. Libutaque, Ph.D.
Mathematics Subject
Representative
TEACHER EDUCATION COUNCIL
Lorina Y. Calingasan, Ph.D.
Social Studies Subject Representative
SECRETARIAT
Runvi V. Manguerra, Ph.D.
Executive Director II
Jayson A. Peñafiel
Education Program Supervisor
PROJECT TEAM
Gina O. Gonong, Ph.D.
Joint Project Team Leader and Director
PNU-RCTQ
John Pegg, Ph.D.
Joint Project Team Leader and Director
UNE-SiMERR
Christine Reading, Ph.D.
Senior Research Fellow
UNE-SiMERR
Michael Wilson I. Rosero
Senior Research Officer
PNU-RCTQ
Mikkey Mari M. Tuazon
Research Officer
PNU-RCTQ
PNU-RCTQ and UNE-SiMERR National
Research Centre
Jennie V. Jocson, Ph.D.
Deputy Director, PNU-RCTQ
Allan S. Reyes. Ph.D.
Senior Program Manager, PNU-RCTQ
Joy Hardy, Ph.D.
Deputy Director, UNE-SiMERR
Ken Vine, Ph.D.
Principal Research Adviser
UNE-SiMERR
Support Staff
Silvia Danieli
June Billings
Ambrose McDermott
Glinore Morales
Beverly Estocapio
Ruby Gantalao
Luis Angelo Abergas
Lyndon Morales
Guillen Nabong
Ezra de Jesus
WRITER-COORDINATORS
Jennifer E. Lopez
Education Program Supervisor
Region IV-A
Maria Concepcion Beltran - Montenegro
Faculty, Ateneo de Manila University
WRITERS
Adelyn R. Bartolome
Domingo R. Cueto
Alfred James A. Ellar
Mark Anthony P. Idang
Gerlie C. Lopez
Francis Victor A. Medrano
May Grace D. Salazar
Shiela Niña Rea-Santes
Ryan G. dela Torre
John Paul dela Rosa
Grace Urbien-Salvatus
Karina Angela C. Celestial
Arlene M. Hernandez
Christian Mespher A. Hernandez
REVIEWERS
Shirley N. Cerbo
Jerome A. Chavez, Ed.D.
Mary Leigh Ann C. Perez
Vivian I. Buhain, Ed.D.
Philip Jay N. Alcoberes, Ph.D.
Allen U. Bautista, Ed.D.
Maricel D. Ambid
Manuel R. Apuli
Florpina B. Galay
Sandra A. Garcia
Eduard O. Gonong
Ryan H. Homan
Glen P. Honrado
Neri D. Mangalindan
Amparo M. Muñoz
Natividad V. Nacino
Aufric Alma N. Navarro
Carlo Donato E. Olivan
Jose Ariel S. Padsoyan
Jennifer M. Rojo
Gemma A. Realo
Neil Vincent C. Sandoval
EDITOR
Myrna L. Macalinao, Ph.D.
GRAPHICS & LAYOUT ARTIST
Raymond S. Bermudez
AUSTRALIAN EMBASSY
Francesca Lawe-Davies
First Secretary-Education
BASIC EDUCATION SECTOR
TRANSFORMATION (BEST)
PROGRAM
Kaye Cox
Team Leader
Alison Atwell, Ph.D
Component Lead
Teaching and Learning
Soledad L. Lecaroz
Teacher Development Adviser
Special thanks: All Regional
Directors, Superintendents and
Principals who supported the
project

MODULE11
27

Module11.ppst5.2.2

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Module11.ppst5.2.2 (20)

More from Noel Tan (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Module11.ppst5.2.2