Mpc implementation for cdu (2002 nprc gcc)

NATIONAL PETROCHEMICAL & REFINERS ASSOCIATION
1899 L STREET, NW, SUITE 1000
WASHINGTON, DC 20036
CC-02-157
MULTIVARIABLE CONTROLLER IMPLEMENTATION
FOR A CRUDE UNIT: A CASE STUDY
By
Pradeep Singh
Laplace Technologies Inc.
Tsutomu Hiroshima
Nippon Petroleum Refining Company
Marifu Refinery
Kazuyoshi Kakinoki
Nippon Petroleum Refining Company Marifu Refinery
Paul Williams
Esso Petroleum Company
Fawley Refinery
Dr. Y Zak Friedman
Petrocontrol
Presented at the
NPRA
2002 Computer Conference
November 18-20, 2002
Renaissance Austin Hotel
Austin, Texas

This paper has been reproduced for the author or authors as a courtesy by the National Petrochemical &
Refiners Association. Publication of this paper does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the
opinions of the NPRA, its officers, directors, members, or staff. Requests for authorization to quote or use
the contents should be addressed directly to the author(s)

Multivariable Controller Implementation for a Crude Unit : A Case Study
Pradeep Singh, Laplace Technologies Inc.
Tsutomu Hiroshima, Nippon Petroleum Refining Company, Marifu Refinery
Kazuyoshi Kakinoki, Nippon Petroleum Refining Company, Marifu Refinery
Paul Williams, Esso Petroleum Company, Fawley Refinery
Dr. Y Zak Friedman, Petrocontrol
CC-02-157
Page 1
1. OVERVIEW
In end-1998, Koa Oil (now a part of Nippon Oil Corporation) embarked on a comprehensive advanced
control implementation at its two refineries in Marifu and Osaka. The advanced control implementation
involved implementing multivariable controllers and optimizers across all the major process units in both
refineries plus a separate oil movements & blending optimization project.
Koa selected Honeywell Hi-Spec Solutions’ Profit® Suite for multivariable control. At the completion of the
project in mid-2001, a total of 22 Profit® Controllers (Formerly Robust Multivariable Predictive Control
Technology - RMPCT controllers) and 2 Profit Optimizers® were implemented at the two refineries. The
estimated benefit from all these applications is estimated as about 4 million dollars per year.
This paper specifically deals with the multivariable controller implementation at the #4 crude unit at Marifu
refinery and describes the major highlights of this application.
1.1 Crude unit at Marifu refinery
The Marifu Refinery #4 CDU operates at a nominal feed capacity of 127,000 BPSD. The unit is divided into
a crude section and a gas plant section (Fig – A). The crude section is made up of two preheat trains on
both sides of a desalter, a prefractionator, a crude heater, and a 52 tray crude fractionator, The gas plant
section is made up of a 35 tray debutanizer column and a 40 tray depropanizer column. The products from
the prefractionator and fractionator are light and heavy naphtha streams (LSR and HSR) that are combined
to form a wide-cut naphtha (WSR) product, a wide-cut naphtha stream to CCR, three kerosene streams
(light kero, 2nd kero, and 3rd kero), gasoil (GO) and topped crude (TC). The overheads of the prefractionator
and fractionator go to the Gas Plant where they are separated into butane and propane.
The crude unit operation is complex in two respects. First there are many operational modes calling for
entirely different operating conditions. Second the unit undergoes severe crude switches.
To illustrate the mode complexities, the three kerosene and gasoil sidestreams are combined in various
ways. There are different property specifications for the product streams in each of the operating modes.
Following are the most common crude types and operating modes.
Table 1 Major crudes processed and operating modes
Crude Processed Operating Modes
Middle East (ME) ME-#1 Kero
ME – JP
ME – Jet
Ratawi (RW) RW - #1 Kero
RW – JP
RW – Jet
Sumatran Light (SL) SL – Molex

The differences between the operating modes are due the way the side-streams are blended together. The
following table illustrates sidestream combinations during the different modes.
Table 2 Sidestream product blending
Operating Mode
Sidestream ME/RW #1 Kero ME/RW #1 Jet ME/RW JP SL Molex
Lt. Kero (LK) #1 Kero #1 Kero #1 Kero BGO
2nd Kero (2K) #1 Kero #1 Kero #1 Kero BGO
3rd Kero (3K) #1 Kero #1 Kero JP Molex
GasOil (GO) GasOil GasOil GasOil BGO
The crude unit processes a number of crude slates with crude switches occurring every 2 to 5 days. Some
of those switches are so severe to the point that without APC it takes a long time to line out the unit and
occasionally this leads to incidents such as pump cavitation, off specification products and furnace
overheating.
CC-02-157
Page 2
1.2 Multivariable controller objectives
The following broad controller objectives were decided during the functional design stage.
• Meet the unit feed target. (The controller never needs to maximize the throughput).
• Maximize the production of most valuable products by minimizing product quality giveaways.
• Maximize operations efficiency e.g. by maximizing COT, and minimizing Crude feed preheat bypass
flows, etc.
• Honor various process constraints.
• Optimize crude switch handling by
- Handling process constraints during Crude Switches
- Automating the change of quality targets and optimization objectives
- Minimizing Crude Switching time
Crude switch optimization was expected to be one of the major benefits of implementing Profit Controller.
2. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
There were several major design considerations throughout the course of implementing the project. Some
of these are explained below.
2.1 Non-linear crude TBP model
A high fidelity crude TBP model was thought to be essential both for developing accurate inferentials and
for handling crude switches. Petrocontrol’s GCC (Generalized Cutpoint Control) model (Ref-1) was chosen
for this purpose.
The GCC model is based on first principle calculations such as heat balance and TBP/ EFV conversions. It
gives fast, accurate results and the models do not require much tuning.
The model first calculates naphtha cutpoint for the fractionator based on prefractionator overhead flow,
fractionator top temperature and partial pressure correction. Next, flash zone vapor flow is calculated from
heat balance across the column. This is followed by flash zone cutpoint calculation based on flash zone
vapor flow, flash zone temperature, pressure and steam flow.
The GCC model initially assumes a linear TBP curve between Naphtha and Flash Zone cutpoints. The non-linearities
are then estimated from the column temperature profiles. Finally, the nonlinear TBP curve is
used to estimate the sidestream cutpoints. Fig – B shows a plot of the sidestream flows vs. the linear and
non-linear TBP cutpoints.

During a crude switch, the column can be out of mass balance for a long time but it cannot be out of heat
balance. Since this method is based on heat balance, it gives fairly accurate results for the cutpoint
predictions during crude switches.
The GCC model replaced an old crude TBP model that was in use for the unit. The old model had two
inaccuracies
(a) It ignored the prefractionator completely and considered the fractionator feed as the crude. This led to
errors when the prefractionator column operation was changed.
(b) It did not consider TBP slope non-linearity. The TBP curve for the SL crude was found to be
CC-02-157
Page 3
significantly non-linear.
2.2 Inferential CV’s
A total of 15 inferentials for product properties were developed using the GCC model. These inferential
values were inputted to Profit Controller as CV’s. Overall, the inferential models were excellent as
demonstrated in figures C through I and discussed below.
Figures C through I show the comparison of the inferentials with the lab measurements for JP End Point,
Kero 95%, Kero Freeze Point, JP Flash Point, BGO CFPP, Molex 10% and Kero Flash Point respectively.
The predictions even from difficult inferences like FlashPoint, CFPP and Freeze Point were quite good.
This is demonstrated by the fact that in almost all the cases no laboratory or analyzer bias update
was needed even though all the inferentials were used for online control.
All of the inferential properties except for the cold properties (e.g. freeze point) were based on sidestream
cutpoints. The cold properties required additional density measurement through Watson K factor.
The inferentials were directly used as Profit Controller control variables (CV’s) and were developed for the
product sidestreams for each of the crude types/ operating modes. During a crude switch, these CVs were
dropped or brought in as per the product specifications as shown in the following table.
Table 3 Inferential CVs used in various operating modes
CV SL Molex ME/Rw #1Kero ME/Rw Jet ME/Rw JP
#1 Kero Flash 333 333
#1 Kero 95% 333 333
#1 Kero Freeze Pt 33
#1 Kero Smoke 33
GasOil 95% 333 333 333
GasOil CFPP 333 333 333
JP Flash Pt 33
JP Freeze Pt 33
JP 50% 33
JP EndPoint 33 333
#1 Kero Flash (JP) 33
Molex 10% 33
BGO Flash 33
BGO CFPP 33

CC-02-157
Page 4
2.3 Decision regarding size/ scope of controller
Initially it was thought that the CDU crude section and the gas plant would reside in the same Profit
Controller. During detailed design this was changed to two controllers, one for the CDU crude section and
the other for the gas plant. This design change was done for a number of reasons
• A smaller controller is easier to operate and maintain when compared to a larger controller. The
CDU section controller itself was quite large (24MV’s by 58 CV’s).
• If a single controller was installed, it would require a model between CDU feed rate and debutanizer/
depropanizer constraints. After step testing, it was realized that for such a controller, some of the
models would have a setting time of almost 5 hours. For the crude section the shortest responses
were around 15 minutes. Since having a combination of long and short settling times can reduce the
effectiveness of the control solution, it was decided to split the controllers.
The interactions between the CDU controller and the Gas Plant controller were handled by incorporating
crude unit CVs in the gas plant controller and gas plant CVs in the crude unit controller.
2.4 Quality estimation during crude Switches
The GCC model is best known for its ability to continually estimate the slope of the crude TBP curve. During
a crude switch, as soon as new crude enters the crude column the heat balance is affected (e.g. for a more
volatile crude the cooling load goes up to cope with more vapor) and hence the TBP slope changes.
As the calculated TBP slope changes, the calculated TBP cutpoints and the inferred product quality CVs
also change. Since the responses between the sidestream product flow MVs and the inferred product
quality CVs are fast, the multivariable controller is able to maintain the CVs at target values during the
crude switch.
The timing of the TBP slope update and the resulting multivariable controller manipulations is exactly right.
There is no need to lead or lag the calculation as the change in heat balance occurs exactly in phase with
the change in vapor flow in the column. As the crude switch progresses and the crude TBP slope transitions
to a new value, the multivariable controller continues to simultaneously manipulate the sidestream product
flows (on a minute-by-minute basis) to maintain product qualities.
2.5 Crude Switch handling
Having achieved a good estimation of product properties through crude switches, we were faced with the
challenge of moving the unit fast enough to control those properties while at the same time avoiding
violation of unit constraints. Large multivariable controllers are generally not tuned aggressively enough to
move the unit quickly and we needed to implement that ability by adding disturbance variables (DV’s) as
well as gain scheduling. Additionally we wanted to incorporate features for smoothly moving the unit
through mode switches during the crude switches.
The controller was designed for the following crude switches.
Table 4 Typical crude switch scenarios
SN CRUDE SWITCH FROM TO
1 ME/Rw #1Kero SL Molex
2 ME/Rw Jet SL Molex
3 ME/Rw JP SL Molex
4 SL Molex ME/Rw #1Kero
5 SL Molex ME/Rw Jet
6 SL Molex ME/Rw JP
7 ME/Rw #1Kero ME/Rw JP
8 ME/Rw Jet ME/Rw JP
9 ME/Rw JP ME/Rw #1Kero
10 ME/Rw JP ME/Rw Jet

A crude switching program was developed and implemented in DCS. This program works in conjunction
with the multivariable controller and automates almost all of the operator actions that would otherwise be
required, specifically, the program …..
• Turns certain CVs ON and OFF depending on the crude switch type.
• Changes optimization coefficients
• Changes the high and low limits of certain CV’s/ MV’s.
• Changes product rundown valves
• Changes analyzer sampling points
The operator only has to select the type of Crude Switch, set the various targets (e.g. final feed rate, etc.)
and start the crude-switching program.
CC-02-157
Page 5
2.6 Crude Switch DV
The ME Æ SL & SL Æ ME crude switches were identified as being particularly severe. It was decided to
use a crude switch DV in such cases. (The ME Æ RW & RW Æ ME switches were not severe and the built-in
robustness of Profit Controller was found to be sufficient to handle them.)
This crude switch DV was triggered automatically when the crude preheat temperature (6TI31) crossed a
certain temperature (45 degC). Since the heavy crudes were hotter, crossing the 45 degC line indicated
moving to (or from) a heavy crude.
The models for the DV were obtained by regressing the data over past several crude switches. Some of the
DV models were with flow CVs e.g. crude unit feed (CV03) and debutanizer feed (CV58). These flows
undergo a significant change during crude switch due to differences in crude characteristics. Other models
for the DV were with desalter inlet temperature (CV04) and desalter pressure control output (CV05). These
variables were primarily affected due to the differences in the crude feed temperatures.
The crude switch DV could be used successfully because the changes during crude switches were
significant and predictable and also because there was a good indicator (preheat temperature) for detecting
the crude switch event.
2.7 Gain Scheduling
Gain scheduling had to be introduced in a number of cases to account for the non-linearity of the models as shown
in the following table. A DCS program based on the current values of respective CVs and MVs implemented the
automatic gain scheduling.
Table 5 Gain Scheduling implemented between CVs and MV’s
SN CV MV’s REASON
1 CV54 (fractionator
GasOil ΔP)
MV04 & MV05 (furnace COT’s), MV10
(fractionator ovhd temp), MV11 to MV15
(side-stream flows) and MV18 (fractionator
steam)
When close to flooding limit, the
gains become very high
2 CV52 (gas oil color) MV01 (furnace feed), MV10 (fractionator
ovhd temp) and MV11 to MV15 (side-stream
flows)
Highly non-linear when close to
limit.
3: CV24 (FT receiver
pressure)
MV22 (FT receiver pres. controller output)
Non-linear because the pressure
control is split-range.
4 CV55 (overflash
flow)
MV11 to MV15 (sidestream flows)
To make the control fast when
overflash flow is close to low limit.
5 CV02 (debutanizer
ovhd C5 analyzer)
MV02 (debutanizer top temperature) and
MV03 (debutanizer duty)
The analyzer is highly non-linear.

CC-02-157
Page 6
6 CV04 (desalter
temperature)
MV06 (crude heat exchanger bypass flow) Gain could be changed by the
balance of heat and hydraulics (it
often becomes inverse)
7 CV08 (crude heat
exchanger bypass
valve OP)
MV02 (desalter pressure)
MV06 (crude heat exchanger bypass flow)
MV07 (crude heat exchanger pressure)
Gain could be changed by the
balance of heat and hydraulics (it
often becomes inverse)
3. DETAILED CONTROLLER DESIGN AND TYPICAL OPERATIONS
3.1 List of MV’s, CVs and DVs
The full list of MV’s, CVs and DVs for both the controllers is described below. There were a number of
changes to this list over the course of the project right upto the final commissioning.
Table 6 CDU Profit Controller list of MV’s, CVs and DV’s
Type Tagname Description
Manipulated Variables
MV01 6X7FY10.SP Crude Heater Total Flow Controller
MV02 6PC1.SP Desalter Pressure
MV03 6TC1.SP Prefractionator Top Temperature
MV04 6X7TC21W.SP Crude Heater W cell COT
MV05 6X7TC21E.SP Crude Heater E cell COT
MV06 6FC40.SP Crude Preheat Bypass Flow
MV07 6PC32.SP Crude Feed Pressure
MV08 6FC105.SP Furnace air flow
MV09 6FC23.SP FT LSR Return Flow
MV10 6TC5.SP FT Top Temperature
MV11 6FC12.SP HSR Product Flow
MV12 6DMC14.SP Light Kerosene Product Flow
MV13 6FC14.SP 2nd Kerosene Product Flow
MV14 6FC15.SP 3rd Kerosene Product Flow
MV15 6FC16.SP GO Product Flow
MV16 6FC17.SP GO Reflux Flow
MV17 6FC13.SP HSR Reflux Flow
MV18 6FC109.SP FT Bottoms Steam Flow
MV19 6X4ZY41.SP Light Kerosene Stripping Steam Ratio
MV20 6X4ZY43.SP 3rd Kerosene Stripping Steam Ratio
MV21 6FC111.SP Prefractionator Bottoms Steam
MV22 6PC3.OP FT Column Pressure
MV23 6FC22.SP FC LSR Return Flow
MV24 6TC205.OP Air Preheater Bypass Valve

Controlled Variables
CV01 6XF1MAX.PV Crude feed pumps constraint
CV02 6PI31.PV Crude Feed Pump Suction Pressure
CV03 6FC1M.PV Total Crude Feed Compensated Flow
CV04 6TI39.PV Desalter Crude Inlet Temperature
CV05 6XP1A.PV Desalter PC Output (transformed)
CV06 6XPDFC.PV Prefractionator Column ΔP
CV07 6XFCCP.PV Prefractionator Ovhd Cutpoint
CV08 6PC32.OP Feed pressure controller output
CV09 6FC2.OP Prefractionator Ovhd Flow Controller Output
CV10 6FC38.PV Prefractionator Reflux Flow
CV11 6TI50.PV Prefractionator Ovhd Seawater Condenser Inlet Temp.
CV12 6TC205B.PV Air Preheater Dewpoint Temperature
CV13 6FC105.OP Air Flow Controller Output
CV14 6AO2.PV Crude Heater Stack O2
CV15 6XTSPOW.PV Crude Heater Pass Outlet Temperature Spread – Cell 2 (West)
(Max. POT - Min. POT)
CV16 6XTSPOE.PV Crude Heater Pass Outlet Temperature Spread – Cell 1 (East)
(Max. POT - Min. POT)
CV17 6XTMHNGW.PV Max. Crude Heater (Cell 2 – West) Hanger Temperature
CV18 6XTMHNGE.PV Max. Crude Heater (Cell 1 – East) Hanger Temperature
CV19 6XTMWALW.PV Max. Crude Heater (Cell 2 – West) Wall Temperature
CV20 6XTMWALE.PV Max. Crude Heater (Cell 1 – East) Wall Temperature
CV21 6PC103A.PV Crude Heater Draft Pressure
CV22 6PDI136.PV Air Preheater ΔP
CV23 6PC107.OP FT Blower Suction Pressure Controller Output
CV24 6PC3.PV FT Pressure
CV25 6PI37.PV FT Overheads Receiver Pressure
CV26 6FI84.PV FT MSR Settler Water Flow
CV27 6XTDFTT2.PV FT Tray 2 Temp-Dewpoint ΔT
CV28 6XTDFTT.PV FT Dewpoint-Top Temp ΔT
CV29 6X1KYD.PV #1 Kero Yield (ME/#1 Kero mode, ME/JP mode)
CV30 6FC20.PV FT Topped Crude Rundown flow
CV31 6FC20.OP FT Topped Crude Rundown FC Output
CV32 6XFMN3OP.PV Min. Crude Heater Pass Flow Valve Position
CV33 6TI80.PV FT Ovhds Seawater Condenser Inlet Temp.
CV34 6FC54.OP FT Reflux Flow Controller Output
CV35 6FC11.PV FT Overheads Product Flow
CV36 6FC11.OP FT Ovhds Flow Controller Output
CV37 6XWSR90.PV WSR 90% Point
CC-02-157
Page 7

CV38 6X1KFLP.PV #1 Kero Flash Point (ME/#1 Kero mode)
CV39 6X1K95C.PV #1 Kero 95% Point (ME/#1 Kero mode)
CV40 6X1KFP.PV #1 Kero Freeze Point (ME/#1 Kero mode)
CV41 6X1KSM.PV #1 Kero Smoke Point (ME/#1 Kero mode)
CV42 6XGO95.PV GasOil 95% Point (ME/#1 Kero mode, ME/JP mode)
CV43 6XGOCFPC.PV GasOil CFPP (ME/#1 Kero mode, ME/JP mode)
CV44 6XJPFLP.PV JP Flash Point (ME/JP mode)
CV45 6XJPFP.PV JP Freeze Point (ME/JP mode)
CV46 6XJP50.PV JP 50% Point (ME/JP mode)
CV47 6XJPEP.PV JP End Point (ME/JP mode)
CV48 6XKFLP2.PV #1 Kero Flash Point (ME/JP mode)
CV49 6XMOL10C.PV Molex 10% Point (SL/Molex mode)
CV50 6XBGOFLC.PV BGO Flash Point (SL/Molex mode)
CV51 6XBGOCFC.PV BGO CFPP (SL/Molex mode)
CV52 6AXCL1V.PV GasOil color analyzer
CV53 6XPDFT.PV FT Column ΔP
CV54 6PD48.PV FT GasOil Section ΔP
CV55 6XFOF.PV FT Overflash Flow from GCC Model
CV56 6XAMHSRR.PV HSR Reflux Pump Amperage
CV57 6X7TD21.PV Delta temperature between crude heater cells
CV58 6X5FX01.PV Debutanizer column feed rate
Disturbance Variables
DV01 6XMESLSW.PV ME-SL Crude switch
Remarks
1. The existing total unit feed, 6FC1M proved to be a very noisy signal. Instead, a new tag based on
Prefractionator overhead flow and furnace feed was used.
2. The desalter pressure controller output was transformed using the equal percent type valve equation.
3. Two additional constraints for the controller were the side stripper levels for the 2nd and 3rd kero
streams. Due to the fast responses of the levels in the side strippers, this control was provided outside
Profit Controller. For this purpose, a custom DCS code was implemented that reduces the sidestream
flow if the level goes too low.
CC-02-157
Page 8

Table 7 Gas Plant Profit Controller list of MV’s, CVs and DV’s
Manipulated Variables
MV01 6PC4.SP DB Pressure
MV02 6XT126A.SP DB Top Temperature
MV03 6X5FC11.SP DB Reboiler Duty
MV04 6PC5.SP DP Pressure
MV05 6XT9A.SP DP Top Temperature
MV06 6X6FC02.SP DP Reboiler Duty
MV07 6FC26.SP C3 Recirculation Flow
MV08 6FC27.SP C4 Recirculation Flow
Controlled Variables
CV01 6XDBBC4V.PV DB Bottoms %C4
CV02 6XA14C.PV DB Overheads %C5 (analyzer)
CV03 6XDPBC3V.PV DP Bottoms %C3
CV04 6XDPOC4V.PV DP Overheads %C4
CV05 6PC4.OP DB Pressure Controller Output
CV06 6DB1_LL.PV DB Tray #1 Calculated Liquid Load
CV07 6XDB35.PV DB Tray #35 Calculated Liquid Load
CV08 6LC15.OP DB Bottoms LC Output
CV09 6PC5.OP DP Pressure Controller Output
CV10 6FI60.PV LSR Product Flow To Storage
CV11 6FI62.PV C3 Product Flow To Storage
CV12 6FI64.PV C4 Product Flow To Storage
CV13 6FC35.PV DB Overheads Product Flow
CV14 6XFD26.PV Difference between C3 and C4 recycles flows
Disturbance Variables
DV01 6XF101.PV DB feed rate
DV02 6XFFCLPG.PV GCC Model Predicted LPG Flow
CC-02-157
Page 9
Remarks
1. The old top temperature controllers for debutanizer and depropanizer were replaced by pressure
compensated temperature controllers and used as Profit Controller MV’s.
3.2 Optimization Strategy
Optimization strategy was decided based on discussions with operations, planning and unit engineers. For
the multivariable controller, this optimization strategy was achieved by configuring cost coefficients on the
CVs and MV’s. Some of these cost coefficients change depending on the type of crude and operating
mode.
The numerical value of cost coefficients was adjusted based on trial and error so as to achieve the desired
objective.

CDU Profit Controller
Maximize CDU feed if desired by Planner
Minimize CDU Feed Bypasses (in order to maximize the heat exchange between the colder crude
unit feed and the hotter flow streams such as fractionator bottoms flow and side-stream flows.)
Maximize Prefractionator Ovhd Flow
Maximize Prefractionator Bottom Steam
Maximize Furnace COT
Minimize Fractionator Pressure
Minimize flaring from FT Blower (PC107)
Maximize Fractionator Bottom Steam
Maximize HSR Reflux
Minimize Light Kero
Maximize GasOil
Minimize Topped Crude
Minimize LK Stripping Steam
Minimize 3rd Kero Stripping Steam
Minimize GO Stripping Steam
Minimize FC LSR Return
Minimize FT LSR Return
For the following MV’s, the optimization strategy was different for different operating modes.
Table 8 Optimization strategy for different operating modes
CV SL Molex ME/#1Kero ME/Rw Jet ME/Rw JP
GasOil Reflux Min Min Max Min
2nd Kero Flow Min Max Max Min
3rd Kero Flow Max Max Max Max
CC-02-157
Page 10
GAS PLANT Profit Controller
Minimize DB, DP Pressure
Min DP Duty
Minimize DB Duty
Minimize C3 Circulation
Minimize C4 Circulation
3.3 Typical operating scenario
Even though several models exist between all the MVs and CV’s, most of the times MVs move because of
only a small set of CV’s. In fact the whole controller can be broken down into several small sets of CVs and
MVs which act like sub-controllers for normal operation (e.g. 95% of the time).
During occasional disturbances or unusual operations, the other models (CV-MV relationships) come into
play.
This kind of a subdivision of the controller is useful for explaining and understanding the controller behavior.

Table 9 Groups of related CVs and MVs for typical operation
DESCRIPTION MV CV
Crude feed control MV01: Feed CV03: CDU Feed
Crude Furnace control MV04: COT-E
MV05: COT-W
MV08: Air
CC-02-157
Page 11
CV14: Furnace O2
CV21: Draft
CV32: Furnace Min O/P
CV57: COT E-W
Preheat Section Control
MV02: Desalter P
MV03: FC Top T
MV06: FC40
MV07: PC32
MV23: LSR Ret to FC
CV04: Desalter T
CV05: PC1.OP (transformed variable)
CV08: PC32.OP
CV09: FC2.OP
CV11: FC seawater
Fractionator Pressure Control
MV22: PC3.OP
CV23: 6PC107.OP
CV24: 6PC3
CV25: 6PI37
Fractionator Top Temperature Control MV10: TC5
CV28: FT Dew Point
CV58: DB Feed
CV33: FT Seawater
HSR Reflux Control
MV17: HSR Ref CV56: HSR Reflux Amps
Side-streams Flow Control
MV11: HSR
MV12: Light Kero
MV13: 2nd Kero
MV14: 3rd Kero
MV15: GasOil
CV37: WSR 90%
CV38: Kero Flash - ME#1 Kero
CV39: Kero 95%
CV40: Kero Freeze
CV41: Kero Smoke
CV42: Gas Oil 95%
CV43: Gas Oil CFPP
CV44: JP Flash
CV45: JP Freeze
CV46: JP 50%
CV47: JP/ Molex Endpoint
CV48: Kero Flash - ME/JP
CV49: Molex 10%
CV50: BGO Flash
CV51: BGO CFPP
CV52: GasOil/ BGO Color
CV54: Gas Oil delta P
CV55: Overflash
Gas plant Profit Controller
Debutanizer column control MV02: DB Top Temp
MV03: DB Duty
CV01: DB Bottom C4
CV02: DB Ovhd C5
CV06: DB Tray -1 Load
CV07: DB Tray -35 Load
Depropanizer column control MV05: DP Top Temp
MV06: DP Duty
CV03: DP Bottom C3
CV04: DP ovhd C4
Debutanizer overhead flow control MV07: C3 Recycle
MV08: C4 Recycle
CV13: DB ovhd Flow
CV14: C3 - C4 Recycle flow

CC-02-157
Page 12
4. BENEFITS ACHIEVED
A benefit study was carried out after several months of stable operation following the controller
commissioning. These are described below.
4.1 Increase in absorbed duty of CDU Furnace
After Profit Controller, absorbed duty for CDU Furnace increased due to following reasons (Fig - J):
(a) Ability to operate at higher COT by tighter control of O2 (CV) and optimum airflow (MV) manipulation.
(b) Ability to operate at higher COT by pushing against the pass flow minimum O/P constraint.
(c) Lower column pressure
Higher absorbed duty leads to better fractionation, which improves gasoil yield. This benefit was quantified
as about 400 kUS$ per year.
4.2 CDU Fractionator pressure minimization
As a result of Profit Controller implementation, CDU fractionator could be operated at a lower pressure (Fig
– K). This was due to the following reasons.
(a) Use of a better control handle. Profit Controller manipulated the pressure controller output (6PC3.OP)
instead of 6PC3.SP. Earlier, the PID control of pressure was poor because of non-linear behavior due to
split-range operation. The control was significantly improved (see Fig – K) as a result of choosing a direct
control handle (pressure valve output) and implementing gain-scheduling to take care of the non-linearity.
(b) Better constraint control. Pressure was minimized while satisfying the constraints for following 3 CV’s:
• Fractionator pressure 6PC3.PV
• Receiver pressure 6PI37.PV
• Blower suction pressure output 6PC107.OP
Earlier the pressure had to be conservatively operated higher because the operator had to handle the
constraints manually.
As a result of lower pressure operation, gasoil recovery improved due to better fractionation. This benefit
was quantified as about 175 kUS$.
4.3 Better Overflash Control
Profit Controller could accomplish better overflash flow control than before due to two reasons:
• Overflash flow being a CV could be controlled directly
• Overflash CV was based on a combination of flowmeter and the calculated flow from GCC model. (This
was helpful because the overflash flowmeter reading often went out of range).
This helped in maximizing gasoil flow sometimes during JP Operation. This benefit was not quantified.

CC-02-157
Page 13
4.4 Gas plant operation flexibility
For Gas Plant operation with Profit Controller, the operator now has more flexibility than before to regulate
debutanizer bottoms %C4 based on requirement. For example, the operator now can either
• Minimize %C4 in Debutanizer Bottoms by operating close to flooding (this was not possible before) OR
• Set a target for %C4 based on requirement.
4.5 Improved crude switch handling - CDU
Before implementing Profit Controller, a number of actions had to be done manually during crude switch
such as:
• Operator initially decided/ guessed the correct TBP cutpoint setpoints depending on the crude type and
desired product specification. Then he had to make small adjustments to get the right product quality.
(Our APC application does this automatically based on 15 inferential CVs as shown in Table-6.)
• Operator manipulated the fractionator sidestream flows to control overflash and gasoil delta P. GasOil
delta P is the pressure drop in the gasoil section of the fractionator and is an important indication of the
onset of flooding in the fractionator. (Profit Controller does this automatically since overflash and GO
deltaP are CV’s. There is also a crude switch DV for GO deltaP.)
• Operator manipulated furnace feed rate to achieve the correct CDU feed target. (Profit Controller does
this automatically. CDU Feed is a CV and it also has a crude switch DV model.)
• During crude switch, operator used to manually increase COT while observing oxygen and gasoil delta
P. (Profit Controller does this automatically because it has these CVs and in addition to DV model.)
None of the above actions are required after Profit Controller.
4.6 Improved crude switch handling – Gas Plant
Profit Controller has several features to handle crude switches, e.g.:
• Debutanizer feed DV. The debutanizer feed changes significantly in the event of a crude switch and
this DV gives advance information to the controller before the disturbance hits the column.
• LPG in debutanizer feed DV. The LPG in debutanizer feed is calculated by the GCC model. Similar to
the debutanizer feed DV, this gives advance information to the controller.
• Debutanizer overhead flow CV. During some of the crude switches the debutanizer ovhd flow drops too
low. This CV enables Profit Controller to keep this flow in control by manipulating the recycle flow MV’s.
With Profit Controller, crude switching requires almost no action by the operator. Before Profit Controller,
the operator had to perform several actions during crude switches such as:
• Ramp setpoints of debutanizer bottoms RVP and overhead C5 control
• Adjust debutanizer and depropanizer duties
• Sometimes adjust the fractionator ovhd. temperature in order to prevent overloading the debutanizer.
(Profit Controller now takes care of this constraint automatically since CDU controller has a max
debutanizer feed CV limit.)

CC-02-157
Page 14
4.7 Light Kero flow minimized
After Profit Controller, the light kero flow could be minimized (Fig – L). This results in more heat recovery in
the crude preheat section because light kero doesn’t take part in heat exchange while the 2nd kero and 3rd
kero do. This also leads to improvement in fractionation.
This benefit was also not quantified.
4.8 Better constraints handling
With multivariable controller, a lot more constraints could be handled easily as compared to the regulatory
schemes earlier. As a result :
• Better optimization could be achieved.
(Since Profit Controller is controlling all the CVs every minute, it does a better job at pushing them
against the limits as compared to the operator).
• Operator load was reduced.
(Almost all of the possible constraints were built into Profit Controller as CV’s, including the variables
which only constrained occasionally.)
The following ‘new’ constraints (CV’s) were handled by the controllers.
Table 10 New constraints handled by Profit Controller controllers
Desalter Pressure OP
Crude Line Pressure OP
(6PC32.OP)
Prefractionator Ovhd Flow OP
Prefractionator Sea-water Temp
FT Ovhd Blower suction OP
FT Ovhd Receiver pressure (6PI37)
FT DewPoint - Top Temperature
FT Ovhd Sea Water Temp
Minimum Furnace Pass Flow OP
HSR Reflux Flow Amps
Overflash Flow
Gas Oil Delta Pressure
Debutanizer Feed
WSR90%
Kero 95%
Kero Freeze
Kero Smoke
Gas Oil 95%
JP Freeze
JP 50%
Molex / JP End Point
Molex 10%
Gas Oil 95%
Gas Oil Color
Gas Plant Profit Controller
Depropanizer Overhead C4
Depropanizer Bottom C3
Debutanizer Tray-1 Load
Debutanizer Tray-35 Load
Debutanizer Overhead Flow (6FC35)
5. CONCLUSION
A number if tangible and intangible benefits were achieved by multivariable control implementation. An
annual benefit of about 0.6 million dollars per year could be readily quantified.
The operator load for normal plant operation and crude switch handling for CDU and gas plant was
reduced. Almost all the possible constraints for the crude unit were incorporated in Profit Controller. A few
additional benefits existed which could not be readily quantified e.g. those due to high quality inferential
CVs for CDU products.
For the future there is potentially a huge benefit if the economics change so as to maximize the CDU feed.

CC-02-157
Page 15
6. REFERENCES
1. “Control of crude fractionator product qualities during feedstock changes by use of a simplified heat
balance”.
Y. Zak Friedman, 1985 American Control Conference.
7. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Profit ® is a registered trademark of Honeywell International Inc.
All other brand and product names shown are trademarks of their respective owners.
8. DIAGRAMS

Mpc implementation for cdu (2002 nprc gcc)

More Related Content

What's hot (19)

Viewers also liked (7)

Similar to Mpc implementation for cdu (2002 nprc gcc) (13)

More from Yang Lee (8)

Mpc implementation for cdu (2002 nprc gcc)