New Imperialism DBQ

New Imperialism DBQ
The new Imperialism was the new period of colonial expansion and new inventions. The new age of
imperialism brought wealth and power. The wealth and power that was brought were essential for
the expansion of European Nations, the United States, and Japan. The age of new imperialism was
motivated by many things some of those were, the promise of economic growth, the sting of
national rivalries, and a sense of noble superiority. During the new imperialism, some European
nations began to seek strict political control over foreign and overseas areas. The main motive
behind economic forces was that Western industrial countries needed raw materials to run their
factories and markets to sell their manufactured goods in. Some social forces that caused ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The economic motives that were responsible for the new imperialism was the desire for raw
materials such as coal, iron, and cooper. Asia and Africa were a main target to get these materials
from and trade to. According to Imperialism and World Politics, the makers of cotton, iron,
telegraphs and railways were strengthened by the higher demand of industries for raw materials
(Document 1). Another economic force that was necessary for the new imperialism was expansion,
according to American Senator A. J. Beveridge, the Americans surplus of goods brought on the idea
of the expansion of the market, and therefore, expansion was necessary to keep up with the high
demand (Document 2). According to the map provided in document 9, Africa was an easy target by
strong countries such as Great Britain because of the fact that Africa had many raw materials. The
main motive behind political forces was the fact that European nations were involved in rivalries
and were competing for power. The political reasons that were responsible for the new imperialism
were the strategies. According to The Century of Total War, the true cause for imperialism was
political
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Imperialism In Brave New World
figuratively. When such systems of oppressors and the oppressed arise, members of society begin to
question such ideologies. In the Heart of Darkness, Marlow explores the brutality that lies within the
endless inescapable power that is associated with imperialism. He sees past the materialistic aspects
of wealth and interprets the actual reality. This is especially clear when Marlow expresses that "They
were dying slowly–it was very clear. They were not enemies, they were not criminals, and they were
nothing earthly now– nothing but black shadows of disease and starvation, lying confusedly in the
greenish gloom."(Conrad 31). Marlow recognizes that the slaves casted in chains were not of any
threat nor were they dangerous criminals. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Furthermore, his experience in the Congo made him feel that the entire journey " was like a weary
pilgrimage amongst hints of nightmares" (Conrad 79). Pilgrimage may sound light–filled and
blessed with great intentions. However, the goal itself is not so righteous. It is more of an act of
robbery, violence, greed, and power than nobility. Whereas, In Brave New World, John the savage is
a white male who is set aside from both Civilization and the savage reservations. He was born from
an actual womb, which is prohibited by the state, but is also not physically similar to the those in the
savage reservations; therefore, he is excluded by both parties. When Bernard exposes John to the
world state, John feels a sense of disconnection which later drives him into utter madness. For
instance, When Helmholtz and Bernard find John in the bathroom throwing up, they hear John utter
that he "ate civilization" (Huxley 213) . Civilization had poisoned him; thus he cannot stand the
inhume customs that the new world offers. Although he despised the savage reservations, he misses
the ability to act human. John is left with the hope to recapture everything that civilization no longer
has to offer, including religion, actual

Imperialism : The Age Of New Imperialism
Imperialism is defined as a strong economic and political empire takes over a weaker economic and
political empire. Stronger empires conquered weaker empires to industrialize the land and to weaken
other threating empires. To build a strong empire, a nation must use their military power to conquer
a weaker nation, take the supplies and goods to support the mother nation, and use the supplies and
goods to benefit your own empire by conquering even more empires. Imperialism did not begin in
the twentieth century, imperialism has been around as early as the sixteenth century. The
Imperialism in early sixteenth century is referred to as the "Age of Old Imperialism". The
Imperialism that is going to be referred to in this paper is going to be known as the "Age of New
Imperialism". This new trend of Imperialism leads us into the question of why did the Europeans
want to be Imperialistic? Europeans wanted to be Imperialistic because of economic and
industrialization interest, political and military interest and for cultural interest. The European
nations were reaching their peak in power, while China and India were reaching their low points in
power. These new causes of Imperialism is what divided the weaker empires from the stronger
empires in the early 20th century.
Approaching into the late 19th century, all the current powerful empires wanted to stay on top. It
was necessary for European nations to industrialize weaker nations for economic expansion. Every
nation wanted to

New Imperialism In The Late 19th Century
The "New" Imperialism came about in the late nineteenth century. Western Europe focused on
expansion trying to make their countries greater through invasion. The imperialism of these decades
is called "new" because of the rush to rule more territories directly rather than just control with them
(730). Nations included in this new imperialism were Africa, Asia, and the Caribbean. The Scramble
to Africa began in the 1880s. Many countries in Europe challenged each other for: dominance over
the land in Africa, for the materials produced in Africa such as palm oil, cotton, diamonds, cocoa
and rubber, and for control over the ports along the coasts in Africa. All nations had a conference in
Berlin discussing how to divide their territories in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Japanese went and visited to Europe and the United States to find out more about technological and
industrial developments in these world fairs they were holding. Japans strong desire for success
provoked neighbors like China and Russia. The Russians had built the Trans–Siberian Railroad that
sent Russian colonizers who contributed to Anti–Japanese groups in Korea. In the battle of
Tsushima, the Japanese destroyed the Russian fleet who traveled halfway around the globe to be
defeated in. Opening an era of Japanese domination in East Asian Politics, the victory was the first
by a none – European nation over a European great power in the modern age (736). After the
Japanese defeated the Chinese in 1895, drought and famine made it a struggle for the Chinese. They
created an organization called the Society of the Righteous and Harmonious fist, or boxers who
made it their mission to defeat anyone who they thought caused their misery. Eight colonial powers
put down the boxer up rising and required the Chinese to pay a huge amount in addition to forcing a
wider foreign military occupation

Effects Of New Imperialism In China
New Imperialism started China's downward spiral. Europeans, British, and Americans made a mad
dash to claim new territories. The main goals of these countries were to supply their countries with
raw materials to fuel their economic growth. Benefits to occupied countries were determined by
which country and what faction of that country occupied the territory.
During this time period Britain took over India. They began growing opium and tea. Tea happened
to be a major export of China. India would eventually replaced China as the main exporter of tea.
Japan would also eventually start competing with China for the silk and tea industry. This lead to a
weakening of the Chinese economy. Opium that was grown legally in India was now being
smuggled, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To combat the foreign powers pushing into the country and demanding a more modern system of
trade, The Chinese government dispatched Lin Zexu. He was a leading Chinese scholar and official
of the Qing (Manchu) dynasty. Zexu lead the First Opium Wars against the British. He banish the
British with the Help of the Portuguese from Macao. The British settled in Hong Kong, which gave
them great positioning for further attacks on China. While China spent time and money fighting this
war countries like India, that had been more accepting of westernization, benefited from
infrastructure and education.
When the British wanted to re–open trade with China, and they wanted a european style diplomatic
relationship. Using India's ships, that the British controlled, they shut down Chinas trade ports and
forced China to negotiate.
After this war China was forced into signing a treaty and trade agreements. China being displeased
with the treaty, refused to have Foreign Diplomates in the capital and the expansion of trade fell
short of the western expectations. In 1856–1860. Thousands of foreign troop occupied the capital
and burned down the emperors summer palace. This lead to more trade ports leased in perpetuity to
foreign

Colonialism And New Imperialism
Imperialism occurs when a strong nation takes over a weaker nation or region and dominates its
economic, political, and cultural life. Colonialism is a key component of Imperialism going as far
back as ancient time. Establishing colonization affects a nation's world dominance and power.
Imperialism began in the world of exploration and continues today in the invasion of Iraq and
Afghanistan. Imperialism has changed through time. "Old Imperialism" was aggression, military
invasions, diplomatic pressures, take–overs and colonization. "New Imperialism" has many
differences. The strongest being that it is more economic than military. European Imperialism, or
"Old Imperialism" (1450–1650), happened largely for political power and economic reasons.
France, Britain, Portugal, Germany, and Spain, all fought for African territory. The 15th–16th
centuries was an era of discovery with explorations by land and sea. These explorations opened up
new trade routes across the ocean and the increase of colonization. The convenient location of
Africa, with its coastal land, assisted European nations exploring new routes to Asia while seeking
gold, land, precious metals, spices, luxuries, and agricultural plants.
Spanish and Portuguese soldier's, "Conquistadors," conquered much of the Americas and African
territories. Military conquistadors enslaved native people with the use of superior military
advancements. Gold and wealth meant power when building empires. Africa offered large

Compare and Contrast Old and New Imperialism Essay
Compare and Contrast old and new imperialism
New Imperialism of the late 19th and early 20th centuries compared to Old Imperialism of the 16th
and 17th centuries. Imperialism is the spread of control over territories across the globe. The
Industrial Revolution and interests in nationalism created a new period of imperialism around 1750.
Old imperialism lasted from 1450– 1750, but imperialism alone remained until 1914.Old
imperialism and new imperialism shared the same basic concept of controlling and utilizing foreign
countries. Old imperialism focused mainly on systems of trade while new imperialism took bolder
steps to overtaking nations. Old Imperialism was the period from 1450–1750
–Powers were motivated by "gold, glory, and God" ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This led to a focus on a trading system because Europeans didn't want to take on territorial
responsibilities. During the Old imperialism era, Europeans set up trading posts, ports, and docks.
These trading centers benefited the places the mother country was supplying too. They had
objectives to protect their trading centers in native places and none to obtain territories in them.
Europe's trade within and between native lands led to cultural diversity which may have caused a
small breach in unity. However, the old Imperialism era ended due to high costs in taking over
territories and too much time to supply the mother country. There was no time to build up a superior,
organized, skilled army for anyone. Also, due to the Industrial Revolution there was now a faster
more efficient way to create and manufacture products. Throughout Western Europe, political
authority was completely controlled by central governments, while leaders, such as Isabela I, were
busy with the concept of how to increase the power of the state. National wealth was widely viewed
as the groundwork of national power, governmental controls soon dominated nearly all of the state's
domestic economy.
The start of Old Imperialism was based on the military and naval power and the underlining motive
was essentially capitalistic. It began with sea explorations of the Spanish and Portuguese in the
second half of the 15th century. Prince Henry the

Age Of New Imperialism Analysis
During the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, Europe was experiencing an Age of Discovery, led by
the spanish. During this time, nations in Europe were mostly ruled by absolute monarchs, and the
lower classes were repressed. Furthermore, Europe was in constant religious warfare, as
Protestantism had recently arose and created divisions in once united territories. Centuries later,
Europe once again began reaching for international control. This resurgence of exploration is known
as the Age of New Imperialism. The European nations during the Age of New Imperialism had
modern governments, including Socialist and Communist parties, and had just arose from a time of
internal turmoil and revolutions. During this time, from the late nineteenth century ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
During the Age of Discovery, most nations had absolute monarchs, and thus the glory received from
expeditions abroad would directly go to the monarch, rather than to the nation itself. This is
evidenced by the extravagant palaces of Versailles and el Escorial, which were constructed using the
profits from the Age of Discovery. Furthermore, many European nations had impoverished lower
classes, that only suffered while the extravagant monarchs indulged in the new income from
overseas trade. In contrast, during the nineteenth century and the Age of New Imperialism, the glory
received from conquest would increase the nationalism of the entire country. This patriotic fervor
gripped nations and was the cause of both unification and warfare. Specifically, this nationalism and
glory was used by King Charles X of France who gained more power by increasing the patriotism of
his people. Despite his absolutist rule, the people of France did not rebel, as they were proud of their
nation's African expansion. In conclusion, the motivation of glory while expanding is similar in both
of the ages of international growth of European

Dbq New Imperialism
Many times throughout history imperialism has been practiced by various major super powers of the
world. For example, Western Europe decided they would extend their power after the Industrial
Revolution since they became so wealthy from it. They expanded their empires into Africa, India
and China. This is known as the New Imperialism. The desire for expansion was motivated by the
hope of economic growth and more power. There are five types of Imperialism and many positive
and negative views about them. One of the five types of Imperialism is giving economic and
military aid. This can be helpful to the colonies and the mother country. Another is a sphere of
influence. This is an area in which an imperialistic country can do business privately ... Show more
When the colonies become ruled by a mother country this means the natives will most likely
become slaves (Document 2). The European countries will benefit from their labor. In Africa
missionaries came and the natives didn't like them (Document 4). The Africans thought of them very
negatively because they used religion as means to gain trust so they could conquest the natives land.
Also, new diseases were introduced to the natives by the Europeans. There were many more
negative effects of imperialism in Africa like their loss of dignity and their ability to lead themselves
(Document 6). This is because the Europeans taught them that their culture was inferior to theirs. In
the political cartoon in Document 7, it shows a cartoonist implying that Europeans work the natives
in the colonies very hard all for the money. They don't care about the natives well being. In India,
the British took over and many bad effects occurred as result to this. Like, Indian resources going
straight to Britain. Also British manufactured good replaced Indian local industry. Farmers were
forced to grow cash crops like tea and cotton and Indians went hungry. Also, top jobs were reserved
for the British. This left many Indians unemployed. The Indians were treated as inferiors in their
own country. Many wars broke out due to racism and which mother country wanted which colony.
Like in Africa the Boers War in 1899 was a confrontation between the English and the Dutch when
England wanted to take the Cape Colony from the Dutch. Another war in Africa caused by
Imperialism is the Zulu war. The Zulu war was caused by British aggression. In China the Opium
war was between Great Britain and China. It began in 1839 as a conflict over the opium trade that
ended in 1842 with the opening of five Chinese ports to foreign merchants. But the worst effect of
Imperialism is when the mother country tries to replace the culture of the

Colonialism And New Imperialism
New Imperialism was the third wave of colonial expansion, precursored by Catholic colonialism in
the sixteenth century and Mercantile colonialism in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. As the
nineteenth century began, it became apparent that Europe and the United States were the dominant
forces of the world, and that they were in control of defining global society. Proponents of New
Imperialism believed that modern expansionism was necessary for economic, political, and cultural
purposes that would benefit their own country. Furthermore, proponents also believed that
colonization would modernize and incite progress in the civilizations outside of Europe and the
United States. Nonetheless, New Imperialism established deep lines of contempt regarding Western
power, marked with violence, throughout the world. Therefore, New Imperialism was a paltry act
done by the Western world which seems to have produced little benefit. New Imperialism took place
from 1870 to 1914. The Western world, including most of Europe, the United States, and Japan,
were primed to dominate the rest of the world. The Enlightenment rationale combined with a
Romantic love of country, which resulted in an "explosive combination" of "ferocious nationalism"
(Lecture Transcript). Each country used imperialism to broaden their nations and compete with each
other. Michael Johnson stated that "as nationalism grew into a more potent force in the nineteenth
century, it became the source of increased

The Grand Scheme of the New Imperialism
Since it became a necessity in the 19th and 20th century to rule over other nations for economic and
political prosperity, the Europeans did the same for the sake of the mother country, which greatly
influenced the respective aspects. The European or the new Imperialism is a movement, which
brought the worldwide effect of white supremacy. As far as the ideas of historians are concerned,
new Imperialism was the product of economic rationale. It is obvious that every nation looks
forward to uplift their economic status. Although the new Imperialism was a product of economic
rational, it was largely justified for social and political reasons such as "civilizing missions" to help
these countries out. While social effects helped to cause the new Imperialism, it was the economic
advantages that forced the major plays of Europe into the grand scheme of the new Imperialism. The
new Imperialism started by launching a new era of expansionism, they conquered territory by
colonizing nations where it was easy to gain material wealth. . The imperial countries by the
economic and technological powers tried to restructure the reliant nations and regions that could
supply them with the raw materials and food products . This was primarily done in Africa and Asia
on the basis of colonial invasion. The European nations viewed Africa and Asia as a means to
materials such as coal, iron and copper. They chose these continents based on the material wealth
and as well the convenience of their

The Advantages And Disadvantages Of The Scramble For Africa
In the 1880s the "scramble for Africa" began. The "scramble for Africa" was when European
countries occupied, colonized, and divided Africa during the period of new imperialism. In the
beginning imperialism in Africa seemed beneficial but then opinions changes. As imperialism
spread many began to view imperialism differently than before, while some saw only the benefits of
imperialism other saw the disastrous aftermath. In the past imperialism in Africa was viewed as both
beneficial and harmful because of the disadvantages of imperialism, the benefits of imperialism, and
the effects that imperialism had on the Africans.
Although there were benefits of African imperialism, there were also disadvantages for the nations.
When writing about African imperialism a British scholar, J.A. Hobson, said that during the period
of imperialism there were many wars that were caused by Europeans attacking people who they
considered to be 'lower races' (Document 1). The 'lower races' were at a disadvantage because the
Africans did not have the same modern weaponry that the Europeans did, which was one of the
military causes of new imperialism. Another example is an excerpt from Balance Sheets of
Imperialism which points out that, "In fact, her expenditures on colonies for that time was 6,856
million lire" (Document 8). This is an example of a disadvantage because even though there was
money being made in the colonies, the countries still had to pay for things like live costs and wars

New World Imperialism
The Restructuring of the New World: Imperialism
According to Oxford Dictionaries, imperialism is a policy of extending a country's power and
influence through diplomacy or military force. Based on this definition, I can already infer that
imperialism is not a good thing because it is well known throughout history and even today, that
stronger nations have taken advantage of weaker ones for their own benefit and not the greater good.
When it comes to figuring out whether or not imperialism did more harm than good I would agree
with that because act of colonizing and developing indigenous populations was, for the most part,
about expanding territories, and self–economic gain for the imperialists that terrorized these weaker
nations. Furthermore, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Some may argue that imperialism brought modern infrastructure and education to poorer nations
however the process they took to achieve that was through violent and inhumane ways. Many
people were terrorized by these imperialists. Almost all of Africa was dominated by western
countries during the scramble of Africa in 1880. Historical documents show that imperialists treated
indigenous people as slaves. Many were manipulated into signing papers that offered what was best
for their country but with hidden motives that consisted of surrendering their rights and property,
and not to mention the amount of profit they receive ranged from little to nothing. Because of
arsenal superiority, resistance was futile for the colonized

Imperialism And Population Migration During New Zealand
Brownlow (2005) states that "colonisation, imperialism and population migration have always lead
to the demise of languages" (para. 2), and this 'rule of thumb' is no different in New Zealand. In the
early 1900s te reo Māori (the Māori language) was, by and large, the sole language spoken by the
Māori population, yet by the 1930s many Māori were bilingual. (Higgins & Keane, 2014). Higgins
& Keane (2014) attribute this to the negative societal attitude toward speaking te reo Māori in
schools –that eventually spilled into home environments– and the fact that many Europeans
advocated for monolingualism. As a result of years of this abuse, te reo Māori was threatened with
extinction. (Spolsky, 2003). The 1970s and 1980s were decades where many ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
(Fishman, 2013). Giacalone Ramat (1983) succinctly defines language shift as "the change of habits
by a linguistic community as it gradually substitutes one linguistic variety of traditional use with
another variety, either long present in the community itself or newly introduced" (p. 495), and
mentions that language shift is the precursor to the terminal phases of language death, language loss
and language extinction. Fishman (as cited in Department of Internal Affairs, 2014) adds that the
stages to language shift include increased contact with mainstream groups, an increase in the new
language being spoken by migrants, and learner proficiency in the new language that subsequently
leads to better opportunities. These stages fit with events and views held in early colonial New
Zealand and were the impetus for language shift in New Zealand.
The attempted assimilation of Māori into mainstream society had an extremely negative effect on
Māori language and culture and is an example of one such act. Fleras (1985) describes that early
British–Māori policy included the need to protect and assist Māori, but as virtually all legislation
was concentrated on complete Māori assimilation into the mainstream, it seems that assimilation
was always the primary objective. The policy of assimilation was "to establish government control
over the Māori by phasing out as humanely as possible the

Compare And Contrast The Old And New Imperialism
Imperialism is the movement of colonizing people by gaining political and economic, cultural
control of other regions. There are two types of imperialism happened in different time periods
which are the old and new imperialism. The old imperialism occurred between the sixteenth and the
eighteenth century. It was the time when the European powers started to expand their empires
through conquest and trade with other countries. After the American Revolution, it prompted the
ideas of new imperialism, which focused more on Asia and Africa. The European countries wanted
to expand more in order to gain more power, search for new markets, raw materials, and build a new
stronger military. Imperialism has brought countries trade, naval bases, and ... Show more content
It made illegal trade in opium legal and opened five Chinese ports and forced China to give Hong
Kong to Britain. On the other hand, the American imperialism wanted to expand westward in hopes
of finding more resources and land in order to increase its economic benefits. The Monroe Doctrine
is a U.S. policy that defended US against other empires. ( Tusan, Lec, October 18). It says that U.S.
would expand into uncolonized areas in the west and Europeans should have no business in what
United States does. After the Spanish–American War, the American government realized that there
are countries that can serve as their colonies during the times of their global expansion. Therefore,
they took investment opportunities in different countries. Some of these colonies they have
conquered from Spain included Puerto Rico, Guam, Cuba, and Philippines. They had a notion that
imperialism would bring them the cheapest labor force from the colonized territories that can help
them manufacture at reduced costs. Aside from getting low cost of labors, they also get the cheapest
raw materials, which can be used, in manufacturing the country 's products. The American
imperialism believes that colonies of weaker nations need to help the stronger nations in order to
gain wealth. Consequently, they will also pass their wealth to the nations they have conquered.
European nations not only competed with each over best resources, markets, and trade, and but

The New Imperialism
The Industrial Revolution start in England in the begin of the 19th century. The advanced techology
England had form a new system other agriculture. New factories where goods were made and
shipped to places all over the caribbean. Industrialism is economic organization of society built
largely on merchandised industry rather than agriculture, craftsmanship, or commerce.
The New Imperialism In the late 19th century (1880's), a new phase of Western expansion and an
intense scramble for new territory began.European nations began to view Asia and Africa as a
source of much needed raw materials (coal, iron, and copper) AND a new market to send their
manufactured goods. Early European imperialism was in the form of small colonies, trading posts,

Imperialism Essay
Imperialism played a major role in global development, especially in the late nineteenth and early
twentieth centuries. In order to better understand this system, it is important to first look at the
history behind it as well as a model of its implementation. Some Europeans advocated heavily for
imperialism, citing several reasons for doing so. However, other Europeans and other individuals
saw the dangers and issues that accompanied it and spoke against European imperialism.
Imperialism was a trend that gained popularity in the latter half of the nineteenth century. It is
defined as the process of nation building in which new territories, often overseas, were acquired
(textbook, 608). This was done in order to increase the influence of a country through greater
economic power. Germany, France, Russia, the United States, and Japan all tried to increase their
influence and compete with Brittan on a national stage by developing their trade industries as well
as seizing new territories (textbook, 608). This resulted in the movement of several influential
entities including capital, commodities, and information. The dissemination of information in the
new territory from the "mother country" was common. This was done in order to help the people
living in the area gain a better understanding of the colonizers. However, these colonies were not
considered equal to the mother country and had either reduced ability to govern themselves or none
at all (textbook 608–609). A good

Old Imperialism vs. New Imperialism Essay
Imperialism is the spread of control over territories across the globe. The Industrial Revolution and
interests in nationalism created a new period of imperialism around 1750. Old imperialism lasted
from 1450– 1750, but imperialism alone remained until 1914.Old imperialism and new imperialism
shared the same basic concept of controlling and utilizing foreign countries. Old imperialism
focused mainly on systems of trade while new imperialism took bolder steps to overtaking nations.
Old Imperialism was the period from 1450–1750, in which powers were motivated by "gold, glory,
and God". Political power was controlled by central governments while leaders were busy trying to
increase their power. National wealth was widely viewed as holder of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Europeans sought out lands that provided new sources of raw materials, cheap labor, markets, areas
of investment, and military boosters. As European nations became competitive with one another,
there was an increased pressure to practice Imperialism to maintain power. New Imperialism was
motivated greatly by the Industrial Revolution and its advancements, and efficiency of
manufacturing and supplying products. European nations also focused on opening trade routes that
would give them places to sell their goods. Also significant was the Europeans desire to Christianize
and "civilize" other nations through missionary work and the enforcement of European cultures and
beliefs. The new Imperialism brought on social changes as well. Many people urged the taking up of
the "White Man's Burden", bringing the European version of civilization to the rest of the world,
regardless whether they wanted it or not. While old Imperialism and new Imperialism obviously
differed they do share some of the same concepts. During each era, both focused on building their
nation stronger, superior, and more enhanced than everyone else through political, economic, and
militaristic strategies. Both Imperialisms brought on war, hatred, and strong levels of competition
among the World. They brought on ethnic diversity as well as cultural diversity throughout. Each
significantly boosted economies worldwide, creating hatful competition which would lead to big

Imperialism And Darkness In Joseph Conrad's Heart Of Darkness
Joseph Conrad's 1899 novel heart of darkness, a story of madness and realization of the open world
giving the idea of imperialism and darkness. Mr. Conrad carried his own idea of "the horror" a story
like no other leaving the open–ended idea of "the horror" which can never truly be defined.
Therefore, Giving the character of Mr. Marlow more ideas about the real world and imperialism,
represented by Mr. Kurtz. Power corrupts a man, Mr. Kurtz proves that point; Mr. Kurtz is the idea
of imperialism, controlling the natives( "savages") to keep as protection from harm and going
insane. "They were not criminals, they were nothing earthly now, nothing but black shadows of
disease and starvation, lying confusedly in the greenish gloom." The policy of extending a country's
power and influence through diplomacy or military force. Subsequently, is exactly what Mr. Kurtz
represents in the trade and discovery of ivory which leads him to go crazy. Using fear and the
gaslight method on the "savages" Mr. Kurtz completes the task of controlling and gaining influence
over the native people. Much like slaves in the United States reacted the same way as the savages
wish to keep Mr. Kurtz as he was in his last days. Prior to their personal interaction, Mr. Marlow
admires and knows Kurtz through his writings and reputation concerning the civilization of the
African continent. He then sets out a journey with the excitement of meeting him. However, the
experience of Marlow in Africa inspires

The Theory Of Biological Evolution
Social Darwinism is defined as the application of the theory of biological evolution to human
affairs. It was used to justify and clarify many notions of nationalism and imperialism. Science
played a huge role in the coming about of this new discovery but in reality, the society shaped the
science of what it was about. Charles Darwin was the root of new era and was profound to come up
with the theory of evolution. His theory had become one the fundamental unifying principles of
modern biology and led to questioning in regards to what was previously stated in the past.
In the 19th century, the United States and Europe underwent tons of changes. Because of the
Industrial Revolution, Americans were off of the farms, and moved into the cities to work in offices
and factories. Steel manufacturing became the dominant industry with an abundance of iron coal.
There was easy access to cheap water transportation routes which aided in speeding the nation's
economy. In Europe, they too experienced the rise of industrialization; Europeans were also leaving
the farms to migrate to cities in search of jobs, technology and trade. However, this new liberal
capitalism upset the balance of power in the European society causing unrest. Prior to the 19th
Century, religion provided the moral, governing perimeters throughout a society. Colonization, up
until this point, was justified by divine right. Commoners did not question those in power; they were
afraid of the ramifications

A New Form Of Imperialism
During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the United States pursued an aggressive
policy of expansionism, extending its political and economic influence around the globe. Reasons
for this were the strong desire for military strength, the thirst for new markets in order to stimulate
the economy and trade, and the core belief in cultural superiority (QUOTE). During that time United
States became an expansionist nation, so by late nineteenth century America's thrust into
Imperialism had already begun. A new form of imperialism to an extent, the policy still involved
extending its country authority and control over foreign countries as a medium of obtaining and
maintaining an empire. Imperialism usually involves a stronger nation (emerging world power U.S.)
extended control over a weaker nation. But different from the previous European empires of the
colonialist time, which were formal administrative systems founded on social, economic and
political control, the American Empire was in one way or another a voluntary association,
established in improving international mass market. United States imperialism is mainly prevalent in
Latin America, which the Spanish–American War of 1898, marks the beginning of. The war marked
the emergence of the United States as an externally focused world power. Post war the United States
was left with a commercial and physical empire and a strong momentum for American nation–
building activities. This era which marks the new

The Age Of New Imperialism
The 'Age of New Imperialism' in Britain was a time of prosperity and total domination. Compared to
previous years of imperialism, this period was focused primarily on benefitting the colonial power,
Britain, instead of establishing new settlements. Even though the British imperialism of the late 19th
century/early 20th century brought great wealth, knowledge, and technological advancements to the
country, it was at the expense of many 'other' people in the empire. Britain, and Europe as a whole,
had to find a way to justify their 'superiority' over these other countries subsequently leading
scientists decided to use their background and knowledge to create disciplines that had racist
ideologies at the root. These pseudo–sciences were constructed to rationalize the imperialism during
the 19th century. This paper will discuss some of the most influential sciences produced during the
late 19th century, including social Darwinism, eugenics, and phrenology, that were used to justify
British Imperialism and how they supported imperialism.
White is the supreme race, non–White people are inferior, White people are the ones with all the
achievements in the world – these ideologies and theories, though formally constructed in the late
1800s, were created from discussions long before. The idea of race superiority has existed since the
15th and 16th centuries, early days of African slavery, but at that time it was supported by religion
and God. In the early 16th century, a Swiss

Racism And Social Darwinism : New Imperialism
During the 1880's, an idea known as "new imperialism" caused most of Europe to enter a period of
colonial expansion that placed parts of both Africa and Asia under European control. Before 1880,
Europe had little influence in Africa. They had relations with the governments and nations that were
present, trading slaves and goods between continents. However, in a period known as the "Scramble
for Africa", Africa was divvied up among the giants: Great Britain took South Africa, Nigeria, and
Kenya; France, North and West Africa; and Germany, East and Southwest Africa. Three main factors
motivated this new imperialism. The first was a combination of racism and Social Darwinism –– the
latter being the belief that, in the struggle between nations, only the strong will prevail. The second
stemmed from religion, and was known as "The White Man's Burden"–– the idea that Europeans
were obligated to bring technology and order to lands that until then had not tasted the amenities of
their so–called "civilization". The third was economics, for the untapped stores of Africa would
bring the nation who could take advantage of them great wealth. Were one to say, "Late 19th century
European imperialism was primarily an economic undertaking", then they would be partially
correct; all these factors influenced the actions of the European nations uniquely. Late 19th century
European imperialism was primarily an economic undertaking to a near–full extent because,
although supporters of White Man's

The New Imperialism In The Late 19th Century
The New Imperialism
Imperialism is the extension of sovereignty and control by a nation or society over another. The
control that the imperialist can use can be political or economic. The control that the imperialist can
use can also either be direct or indirect. The second expansion of the European powers beyond the
continents borders can be best represented by the new imperialism of the late 19th century. The first
expansion occurred after Columbus' voyages to the Americas. This happened around the time period
of 1500 to 1800, in which the western hemisphere was colonized by many European people from all
different places. Some places that they came from were Spain, Portugal, Britain, France, the
Netherlands, the Germanys, and Sweden. The ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The fact that parts of Africa and Asia that were occupied were overly populated was not even the
most important factor. The most important factor why there was a shockingly less amount of
European colonization was an economic one. All European associations had made an economic
transformation. The Europeans switched to industrial/ service economies from agrarian/ commercial
economies. The main difference between the New Imperialism and the old colonialism was
explained by the industrialization impact of the economy. The old colonization was an effect of the
commercial revolution. It had expanded the economies of Europe, sending them to seek more trade
in many products. Colonies were a source of raw materials. Other things expanded like financial
markets, but the main focus was on products from the land. Agriculture was the main driving force
of the economy even if commerce, carrying these products/ materials produced a lot of money. The
New Imperialism wasn't really focused on agricultural things because that was a declining portion of
the economy. Even though there was still a need for raw materials, the most important factor was
markets. The many countries that participated in the New Imperialism reflects markets for the
industrial goods that were streaming out of the factories in industrialized western countries. The
mature and maturing industrial nations were the most successful; Britain, France, Italy, Russia, and
the United States. The Japanese had taken up western technology and political organization after
being awakened to the reality of western superiority by Admiral Perry's

The Difference Between Old, Old And New Imperialism
Imperialism –which is defined as the extension of a country's power and influence through
colonisation, use of military force, or other similar means– occurred in history during two different
time periods. The first bout of imperialism which is often referred to as "old" imperialism occurred
between 1492 and 1800 while the "new" imperialism transpired between 1870 and 1914 (Scammell,
2004). Although the two movements had some similarities, there were several differences starting
with the motivation behind each wave of imperialism and extending to the economic, ideological,
and political differences (Bush, 2006). Those differences are the reasons why the two waves of
imperialism are often classified as 'Old' and 'New'. This essay will be briefly ... Show more content
New imperialism was motivated by the increased production demands created as a result of the
industrial revolution, technological developments in communication and transportation and the
wave of extreme nationalism (Seton–Watson, 1961). During that time period, the acquisition of new
territories was encouraged as a means of expanding profit by investing capital in the various
territories (Seton–Watson, 1961). In order to meet the constantly growing demands brought on by
the industrial revolution, imperialist countries sought to expand their territories even further (Seton–
Watson, 1961). One major benefit of the expansion was an increase in amount of raw materials
available. Another benefit of acquiring territories included cheap labour which was a necessity due
to the expanding industries (Seton–Watson, 1961). Economic growth was another benefit of
territorial expansion as there were more markets to trade with. This second wave of imperialism
encouraged imperialist countries to take political control of their colonies (Seton–Watson, 1961).
They created new governments that would also benefit them economically as the local leaders
would no longer have to be paid for their provision of raw materials like they were under the 'cash
and carry system' implemented during the first wave of imperialism. Western imperialist nations
believed that they were far more

Motives For Imperialism Essay
The Compelling Motives of Imperialism
The presence of Europe in Africa in the late nineteenth century was one of extreme power. The
countries of France, Britain, and Germany had especially large claims to the African continent
during this time. The motives of imperialism for these countries greatly define Europe at this time.
Insatiable desires for economic markets, power and political struggles, the motivating belief in
Social Darwinism, and the European idea of superiority were the driving forces at the European
home front in the late nineteenth century. Many of the causes for imperialism in Africa were evident
in Joseph Conrad's turn of the century novel, Heart of Darkness.
Successful domination of Africa was not ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Africa, Asia, and the Americas all fell victim to the greed of the Europeans. Furthermore, an
"expanded market" was needed after the rise of the Industrial Revolution (Sanderson "Imperialism
notes"). Surpluses of products demanded a larger community to obtain the goods. The introduction
of machinery reduced the number of workers
Messner 2
needed on the European home front. Imperialism provided a way in which unemployed laborers
could obtain jobs and/or riches. Not all motives for imperialism were greedy and self–motivating
however. The earnest desire of some to help civilize and Christianize natives was the utmost reason
for imperialism.
Europeans contained the belief that their customs and religious values were the sole method in
living. Missionaries from throughout Europe desired to journey to foreign lands in order to teach the
civilized and Christian ways of living to the natives. Often missionaries were in competition for
converts, and thus supplied imperialism with other drives (Patterson, par. 10). The Social Darwinist
ideas were prevalent in this time. The Europeans believed in the survival of the fittest, and it was
generally accepted that the Anglo–Saxons were the superior race. In the 1890's Rudyard Kipling
published "Whiteman's Burden". This poem defines the white man as responsible for civilizing the
"others". It is supportive of the imperialism of other countries

Summary Of New Imperialism
Summary of Day 1
In the late 1800's the U.S. decided they wanted to get rid of isolationist ideas and become a stronger
respected world power. This was referred to as New Imperialism which meant expansion over the
sea. This was good for trade for the US because it gave a new market to sell goods to and it meant
new raw materials would be brought to the US. The US wanted to create a stronger navy and
military to help defend the US right to trade not for war that was the last thing the US wanted. The
US made treaties with politically smaller countries that would be easy to take over. One reason why
the US wanted to expand was because of economics new trade ports and raw materials for
manufactured goods and a larger group to sell too. Manifest ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
President William Taft believed the best way for the US to gain power was through Dollar
Diplomacy.This policy was for the United States to become involved with Latin America. Since
Latin America owed Europe money the US pay Latin America's loans this Made it so your would
not be involved with Latin America anymore. This means Latin America was completely reliant on
America President Taft wanted to increase Latin America's industry and increase the trade to better
the economy in Latin America this also increased business in the US. President McKinley supported
expansion by increasing trade he established the open door policy with China to increase trade ports.
President Roosevelt supported imperialism by increasing the size of the Navy to help keep trade
ports safe he also helped built the Panama canal. This helped save time with transporting goods and
military.The Roosevelt Corollary further showed imperialism working as an extension of the
Monroe Doctrine stating that the US can interfere with Latin America's business as needed to keep
the economy stable in the west hemisphere. Both Taft and Roosevelt worked on preventing
European power using debt problems of Latin America to intervene the west hemisphere. President
Woodrow Wilson did not agree with imperialism he believed in the idea of moral diplomacy. He
believed democracy was the only way to keep the nation stable. His ideas of leading as a moral
example were unsuccessful. He relied on the US military for intervention. One example of this was
the Mexican Revolution. This led to a lot of tension between the US and

Colonialism : Old And New Imperialism In The 1500s
From the time of the 1500s, a policy of expansion known as imperialism had been practiced by
many countries due to political, economic and social reasons. The result of imperialism can be
viewed differently based on a person or country's perspective. Some country benefited from
imperialism while others are imperialized and taken over. There are two time periods of
imperialism, old and new imperialism. Old imperialism occurred from the 1500s–1700 while new
imperialism occurred from the 1700s to the 1900s. Old imperialism focused on mercantilism and
conquering while new imperialism focused on capitalism and obtaining resources. One area new
imperialism was practiced was the Indian subcontinent. There was many motives and reasons for
countries to attempt to imperialize the Indian subcontinent. During the 16th and 17th centuries,
France, Portugal and England all competed for influence along the southeast coast of India. They
were interested in the Indian subcontinent because they wanted to trade for goods that could not be
found anywhere else such as silk, spices, foreign animals and etc. England ended up dominating the
region and was able to take control due to two major reasons. One, the decline of the Mughal
Empire allowed England to be more powerful and two, because many Indians were willing to allow
Britain to rule. As a result, England created a joint–stock company to pursue trade with the Indian
subcontinent called the "British East India Company," lasting from 1700 to

Old And New Imperialism
There were many reasons that the Old and New Imperialisms were considered bad but, there were
many good things that happened. Imperialism had brought more Naval Bases and /or Expand the
military, a new market and raw materials, and Anglo–Saxonism. These were the things brought
many positive societal, political, and economic factors. Although there were many things they could
have done that would have done better. (WORK ON!!!) The positive social aspects of imperialism
contained Americanization, Social Darwinism and, White Man's Burden. Americanization was the
process of an immigrant to the United States to become a person who shares American values,
beliefs and customs and is assimilated into American society. This was not always a good

New Imperialism In Europe
New imperialism is often described as the quick increase and take–over of land that European
powers had during the 19th century. New imperialism was a movement that erupted very suddenly.
Many of the European powers were actually opposed to the idea of taking over new territories. Of
course, as time progressed, all of that changed. Sense there was a creation of new nations; these
nations need resources to be able to establish themselves. Italy and Germany were the two new
nations that used imperialism initially. The change of balance cause more stable European powers to
want more control. There are many factors that are involved with the spread of imperialism in
Europe. Things such as underlying issues that promoted imperialism in Europe, economic ... Show
The scramble was a plan to take over unindustrialized locations around the world and claim them as
colonial possessions. Eventually these lands that were taken over were used for their natural
resources. These natural resources were normally used for European industrial complexes. The way
the European colonists justified their actions was by using social Darwinism through natural
selection. They believed that the European race was more superior or stronger than any other in the
world. This reason is why they conquered Africa. Another factor for the colonization by Europeans
was the missionaries. The missionaries used a less aggressive form of social Darwinism.
Missionaries felt that their purpose was to civilize Africans and spread Christianity. Real
colonization of Africa happened after the Brussels geographical conference. This conference
resulted in the creation of African international association. Later the Berlin conference happened
and Europe portioned the whole continent of Africa. As time passed there were more than 50
countries in Africa that under colonial rule. Many Africans that were against European colonization
were killed by European

Dbq New Imperialism Essay
In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the new imperialism in europe increased. The
new imperialism characterizes a period of colonial expansion by european powers, the united states
and japan. Europeans began colonizing africa and asia and used military force to take over local
governments which led to the new imperialism. The new imperialism was led by many reasons such
as economics, politics, and social forces. Economics had a important role to the new imperialism.
There were many economic factors that affected this period. An economic factor was having
colonies which made it easier for countries to protect their merchant marine and their world trade.
As american senator A.J beveridge (document 2) stated " the trading of the world must and shall be
ours... we will establish trading posts throughout the world as disturbing points for american
products. We will cover the ocean with our merchant marines. We will build a navy to the measure
of our greatness...". America was creating colonies and was becoming imperialistic. Also
introducing ruthlessness in the diplomacy of imperialism, william l. Langer (document 5) which
states "but the economic side.. [survival of the fittest] was pherhaps most crucial". The teaching of
survival of the fittest helped the growth ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
An important political force that impacted the new imperialism was making power grow in the
government. In the map, which is document 9, it shows the growth of imperialism in africa and the
growth of european government. European were seeking power which caused colonization in africa.
It is proven in the century of total war by raymond aron, stating "... none of the colonial
undertakings was motivated by the quest for capitalist profits; they all originated in political
ambitions... the nations' will to power...". This political factor was very important and was a big role
in the start of the

New Imperialism In Africa Essay
When people reflect on New Imperialism–the era when Europe colonized Europe–they recall the
horrors perpetrated by France, England, and Belgium, and they are slow to forget the torture and the
cruel injustice those countries labeled "progress." However, no one seems quick to remembe
rremember generous settlers who, like Mary Slessor , saved many childrens'children's lives, and
easily dismissed are the soldiers who prevented widowed women from being burned alive. Even
though it may have had a large negative effect on much of Africa, New Imperialism also presented a
positive impact as well; it welcomed an entire continent to international culture, put an end to the
natives' cruelty toward their own people, and, most importantly, furthered the work of the Lord.
First, Africa was finally given a place in the international community because of New Imperialism.
For hundreds of years, an entire fifth of the inhabited Earth was excluded from the world's most
important decisions. But because of New Imperialism, they were able to ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
God's constant strategy is to use imperfect people to fulfill perfect purposes. People like King
Leopold II were extremely far from perfect, but their actions, cruel and horrifying they may have
been, did have a purpose that carried out God's law to perfection. This is shown in 2 Corinthians 4:7,
where it says, "But we have this treasure in earthen vessels, that the excellency of the power may be
of God, and not of us," meaning that even though mankind is far from perfect, the consequences of
its actions will eventually lead to a godly purpose, even if its choices are responsible for death and
pain. Furthermore, the mistreatment of African natives actually prepared people generations ahead
of time to accept the gospel; trials give people humility, and only with humility can one receive the
gospel with open

The Hidden Agenda of New Imperialism
1890s was a decade which represented the peak of the imperial power and glory. The 20th century
brought with him a new form of imperialism known as New Imperialism. This concretely referred to
the colonial expansion that the Europe's powers did during that period. Queen Victoria's diamond
jubilee exhibited the power and wealth that the British Empire possessed to the entire world. Such
demonstrations could only be matched by the French, Dutch and Russians which possessed similarly
wealthy empires. Evidently, many other nations aspired and envied those wealthy nations because
their nations had not conquered large empires. Most noteworthy among these nations were
Germany, Austria–Hungary, Italy and Japan. These were countries in the making ... Show more
As Austria– Russian heir Franz Ferdinand was sent to Sarajevo in order to inspect the Austro–
Hungarian troops there, he was assassinated on June 28th 1914 by a Serbian terrorist group known
as Black Hand. This event is considered as being the physical catalyst; one event led to the other.
Following this event, on the 6th July 1914, a telegram was sent by the German Chancellor Theobald
von Bethmann–Hollweg, to the German Ambassador at Vienna. This telegram also known as the
"blank cheque" assures Austria–Hungary that could rely on German support for whatever actions
Austria would choose to take following the assassination. On the 28th July 1914 at 11:00 am
Austria–Hungary sends a telegram declaring war to Serbia. Russia whom believed that an active
defence seemed like the best way to repel the Dual Alliance threat decided to offer full support to
the Serbs and counted on their alliance with France for help. Germany in accordance with the Dual
Alliance treaty made with Austria as well as their aggressive intension towards the east declares war
on Russia. France in accordance with the Franco–Russian Alliance and their desire to regain Alsace
and Lorraine from the Germans declares war on both Germany and Austria–Hungary. Germans
believes that in order to be successful in a joint war with France and Russia it would be best to
overcome France before

The Enlightenment Set the Stage for New Imperialism
New imperialism was the mid nineteenth and twentieth centuries cultural equivalent to a modern
day mafia, its roots entangled in the economic, cultural, and humanistic aspects of life. The sole
objective of the nations entailed the exploitation of their controlled state. Gestating from the change
in control of Asian and African nations to the Europeans by means of political deviance, malicious
sieges, and strategic military attacks. The juxtaposition to the modern equivalent endures as the
aforesaid is sheltered by the fairytale that these nations were in need of aid and by doing so the
Europeans were the good guys. The ideas of new imperialism are greatly influenced by those of the
enlightenment. Taking place during the eighteenth and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
An account of the extreme dependence on the slave trade is that of the Robin Johns. Brothers who
endured years of harsh conditions and experienced the nefarious realities of the trade firsthand, yet
they continued to trade slaves upon returning home as free men; justified only by their strong ties to
Britain and their unique skills (Sparks, 147). The enlightenment formed a pretense of universalism,
while new imperialism furthered the fairytale. Tabula Rosa, meaning blank slate, was a term John
Locke used to convey the ability to convert people through the influence of the environment around
an individual (Genova, 1/13). This was used during new imperialism as a scapegoat. Nations set out
on civilizing missions in order to disguise their imperialist nature. Furthermore, The White Mans
Burden was a written work that was used to rationalize destroying cultures and creating satellite
nations, because it was their burden to help the people of the less sophisticated nations. This aid was
in the form of forced colonization, imbalanced trade, and forced slavery. For example, the
Portuguese set out on their mission of new imperialism to gain trade and slaves (Genova, 2/15).
Stemming from universalism, imperialist nations pursued the enlightenment idea of social
Darwinism. Which equated to survival of the fittest, not only were the subject of Darwin's original
experiment animals, the

Causes Of New Imperialism
New imperialism was a period of colonial expansion by European powers during the late 19th
century and early 20th century. It is distinguished by the continuous territorial acquisitions of Africa
and Asia by European powers. These powers include Great Britain, France, Netherlands, Germany,
and Belgium (Tusan, Scramble for Africa, October 23rd). There were many reasons behind this
aggressive competition. To them, these newfound lands were an opportunity to expand their power
and exploit further resources. To put it bluntly, economic, political, cultural, and ideological
motivations all helped start the era of New Imperialism and its new form of empire.
In terms of economic reasons, European powers sought to maximize profits. Expansion ... Show
An imperial government must protect its own territories while expanding it as well. If another power
gets a territory, they gain that land's resources, meaning more power. Due to this, each European
power perceived other powers trying to expand as a threat to their security and prestige. This results
in every European power to seek out new territories. A prime exemplar of this is the Fashoda Crisis.
France wanted control of the Nile, but that would mean excluding Britain from it (Tusan, The
Scramble for Africa III, October 30th). In the end, France backed off because it needed to be on
friendly terms with Britain in case of a war against Germany. Instead of fighting over a valuable
trade route, France decided the safety of the country was more important if war does happen with
Germany. As a result, Britain's control in Egypt was asserted.
For cultural and ideological reasons, imperial nations believed that their values and beliefs were
superior to anyone else's. A huge concept of New Imperialism was the European "civilizing
mission". In general, Europeans think they're doing a good deed by imposing their beliefs onto the
inhabitants of Africa. As King Leopold II stated, "Our refined society attaches to human life (and
with reason) a value unknown to barbarous communities" (King Leopold II, 222). Since the
Africans were "inferior" to Europeans,

Essay about The Pros and Cons of Imperialism
Throughout history, many powerful nations interfered with nations that were weaker than they were.
This form of sabotaging a nation is economic, political or cultural life is called as imperialism.
Imperialism is often separated into two sects. The first one is old imperialism, which was the period
from the 1500s to the 1800s, where European nation started to colonize many areas such as the
Americas, and parts of Southeast Asia. On the other hand, the new imperialism was the period
between the years "1870–1914", where Europe became more focused on expanding their land into
Asia and Africa. Imperialism had many pros and cons. In addition, it also had many causes led by
the feeling of nationalism. Several significant causes led to the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Their business interests demand that colonial markets should be opened and developed and that
foreign competitors should be shut out. Such aims require political control and imperialism."By
Parker T. Moore, Imperialism and world politics, 1926.Politics and the military also had significance
in causing new imperialism. One example is that when a nation had many colonies it believed it
would be more powerful and secure. The second example is nationalism, which was a motive for
achieving a goal for a nation. Last cause was the poem "The White Man's Burden", which was
written by Rudyard Kipling, to justify imperialism. Imperialism had several diverse impacts on Asia,
Africa, and Europe. The pros about imperialism, was that new roads and railroads that were built
connected many parts of India. The introduction of the telegraph and postal systems united many
people. Discovering new agricultural methods improved farming in the west and in Africa and Asia.
Schools that were built by the British educated many people. Human rights were recognized, by
ending customs that threatened many humans. On the other hand, the cons of imperialism were what
benefited Europeans and infuriated the Asians, and Africans. Many individuals and groups resisted
imperial rule. European tried many ways to westernize the subject people's cultures. Many of the
resources that were manufactured profited the Europeans rather than the Indians. A cash crop
economy was established

What attracted European imperialism to Africa & to Asia in...
Mortimer Chambers et al define imperialism as a European state 's intervention in and continuing
domination over a non–European territory. During the 'Scramble for Africa ' in the late nineteenth
century, the most powerful European nations desired to conquer, dominate and exploit African
colonies with the hope of building an empire. According to Derrick Murphy, in 1875 only ten
percent of Africa was occupied by European states. Twenty years later only ten percent remained
unoccupied. There were several factors which attracted European imperialists to Africa. There were
opportunities for profitable investment and trade. Raw materials, which Africa possessed in
abundance, were also desired. A cheap source of labour was required as it would ... Show more
The British wanted to link their possessions in Southern Africa with their territories in East Africa,
and these two areas with the Nile basin. Obtaining the Sudan was vital to the fulfillment of these
ambitions especially since Egypt was already under British control. This 'red–line ' through Africa
was made famous by Cecil Rhodes and Lord Milner who advocated for a 'Cape to Cairo ' empire
linking by rail the Suez Canal to the Southern part which possessed many minerals. According to
Brian Levack, there was also a certain level of nationalist competition. The unification of Germany
upset the balance of power in Europe. In this climate of tension, governments looked towards
enforcing national strength. The newly formed nations of Italy and Germany now sought empires
outside Europe as a means of gaining power and prestige within Europe. In the nineteenth century, a
German historian Henrich con Treitschke stated "All great nations in the fullness of their strength
have desired to set their mark on barbarian lands and those who fail to participate in this great
rivalry will pay a pitiable role in time to come." Under the leadership of Bismarck, Germany soon
embarked on a quest of expansionism. Bismarck 's distrust of England under Gladstone was one of
the reasons he decided to do this. Germany became engaged in an arms race with Great Britain and
it

New Imperialism Effects
The economic effects of new imperialism seeped throughout the world. The European countries'
standard of living increased since people's income elevated above the subsistence level. These
countries thrived. According to political economist John Stuart Mill, the European's imperialism of
free trade over African regions, led to improvement in the process of production in every extension
of the market. These European countries had an "altogether disproportionate share of the wealth and
traffic of the world," at the expense of the distant African countries. The imperialist economies
prospered, and even today still be some of the most financially stable areas. The opposite is quite
true as well. The financially–abused states had their resources ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
New Imperialism called for a system of administration where the dominance of the home country
was esteemed. Made easier by the fact that Africa in the nineteenth–century was not unified,
European nationalists capitalized on the lack of cohesion in Africa during the nineteenth–century
and overcame small villages with their intimidating and structured way of government. Great Britain
established a protectorate in Egypt which practically synonymous with ownership. In a protectorate,
the dominant country takes the other country under its protection to retain its ownership from other
powers. Colonial governments were also created, meaning that the citizens of the imperialist power
would leave to go live in the new territory as permanent settlers, while still considering themselves
under the rule of the imperialist power. Western European countries affected the developments of
people within their spheres of influence, which directly correlates with the size of the country's
territory, even though no formal authority reigned over the natives of these lands. Having control
over, or practically owning, more territory served as a powerful symbol since the highly regarded
'sphere of influence' grew. A growing obsession with the popularity of new imperialism led to
corruption. European diplomats, especially those with

New Imperialism Analysis
The New Imperialism was centered on nationalism, social Darwinism, and economic expansion. The
colonizers of the time were focused on only improving the state of their own countries and never
even paid attention to what the indigenous peoples were forced to do. All they wanted was influence
and power. On the other hand, the colonized had no control over the situation. They had no power to
fight back against the countries taking them over, and they were forced to change their way of life to
the ways of the white man. Rhodes was a perfect example of one of those colonizers, he believed
that the English were the most superior race and that the world would be better if the English took
over. This is a completely nationalistic view of

New Imperialism DBQ

More Related Content

Similar to New Imperialism DBQ (20)

More from Amanda Burkett (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

New Imperialism DBQ