SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Professor Michael Wysession
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences
Washington University, St. Louis, MO
The Next Generation Science Standards:
What They Mean for Earth and Space Science
In 2006, what percentage of Americans said
that they thought genetics and evolution were
real?
a) 40%
b) 50%
c) 60%
d) 70%
e) 80%
In 2006, what percentage of Americans said
that they thought genetics and evolution were
real?
a) 40% 
b) 50%
c) 60%
d) 70%
e) 80%
In 2006, what percentage of Americans said
that they thought genetics and evolution were
real?
a) 40% 
b) 50%
c) 60%
d) 70%
e) 80%
Out of 34 countries surveyed, only Turkey had
a lower percentage.
Program for International Student Assessment (PISA): 2012
1. The U.S. has an active and productive graduate-level
science research infrastructure
2. The U.S. has a public that is below average in its
appreciation and understanding of science
1. The U.S. has an active and productive graduate-level
science research infrastructure
2. The U.S. has a public that is below average in its
appreciation and understanding of science
These two statements are not compatible in the long term
1. The U.S. has an active and productive graduate-level
science research infrastructure
2. The U.S. has a public that is below average in its
appreciation and understanding of science
These two statements are not compatible in the long term
Story of the juice box:
Prof. David Hammer
Physics Department
University of Maryland
In what year were the first science standards
used for secondary education in the US?
a) 1852
b) 1893
c) 1965
d) 1995
e) 2013
In what year were the first science standards
used for secondary education in the US?
a) 1852 
b) 1893
c) 1965
d) 1995
e) 2013
Following what year did high school science
primarily consist of biology, chemistry, and
physics, omitting geology and astronomy?
a) 1852
b) 1893
c) 1965
d) 1995
e) 2013
Following what year did high school science
primarily consist of biology, chemistry, and
physics, omitting geology and astronomy?
a) 1852
b) 1893 
c) 1965
d) 1995
e) 2013
Are Science “Standards” Effective?
Are Science “Standards” Effective?
• Most science standards are content based
 Lead to a memorization of factoids
Are Science “Standards” Effective?
• Most science standards are content based
 Lead to a memorization of factoids
• Drive “Teach to the Test” school practices
Are Science “Standards” Effective?
• Most science standards are content based
 Lead to a memorization of factoids
• Drive “Teach to the Test” school practices
• “A mile wide and and an inch deep” (too much content!)
Are Science “Standards” Effective?
• Most science standards are content based
 Lead to a memorization of factoids
• Drive “Teach to the Test” school practices
• “A mile wide and and an inch deep” (too much content!)
• Encourage courses about science and not science courses
Are Science “Standards” Effective?
• Most science standards are content based
 Lead to a memorization of factoids
• Drive “Teach to the Test” school practices
• “A mile wide and and an inch deep” (too much content!)
• Encourage courses about science and not science courses
• Boring!
Teaching kids to play baseball and softball….
Teaching kids to play baseball and softball….
[NRC, 2007] [NRC, 2007]
Educational Research promotes Active Learning
[Center on Continuous Instructional
Improvement, 2009]
[NRC, 2012]
NGSS Earth and Space Science
A report by the National
Research Council of the
National Academies of
Science
Completed 2011
Published 2012
NRC Framework: Three Dimensions of
(1) Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs), (2) Science and
Engineering Practices (SEPs), and Crosscutting
Concepts (CCCs)
In what year were the first US national science
K-12 standards adopted?
a) 1893
b) 1965
c) 1995
d) 2013
e) Never
In what year were the first US national science
K-12 standards adopted?
a) 1893
b) 1965
c) 1995
d) 2013
e) Never 
The 1965 Elementary and
Secondary Education Act,
signed by President Lyndon
Johnson as part of his “War on
Poverty.”
 Expressly forbids a national
curriculum.
The NGSS were a “states-led” process
States that have already adopted the NGSS:
Arkansas, California, Delaware, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Nevada,
Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington State, West Virginia, Washington DC
(But also Oklahoma, Massachusetts, and many schools and districts in other
states and countries….)
Teacher
Development
Curricula
Instructional
Materials
Instruction
Assessment
The NGSS are the result of a
multistep process
www.earthscienceliteracy.org
NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary
Core Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas
NGSS Earth and Space Science
NGSS Earth and Space Science
NGSS Earth and Space Science
NGSS Earth and Space Science
NGSS Earth and Space Science
Not all DCIs are in the NGSS!
How is this document different from the NSES?
[NRC, 1996] [NRC, 2012]
How is this document different from the NSES?
[NRC, 1996] [NRC, 2012]
[Natl. Acad. Press, 2013]
NGSS Earth and Space Science Writing Team Members:
Michael Wysession Mary Colson Richard Duschl
Kenneth Huff Paula Mussina Paul Speranza
The NGSS ESS Writing Team
NGSS Earth and Space Science
NGSS Process
NGSS Process
NGSS Process
NGSS Earth and Space Science
Elementary School:
Grade-level; Integrated across all sciences
Middle School:
1 year of Life Science
1 year of Physical Science (Chemistry & Physics)
1 year of Earth and Space Science
High School:
1 year of Life Science
1 year of Physical Science (Chemistry & Physics)
1 year of Earth and Space Science
Performance Expectations
How do you Teach Earth and Space
Science with the NGSS?
PRACTICES CONTENT X-CUTTING CONCEPTS
The scientific method is a way to ask and answer
scientific questions by making observations and doing
experiments.
The steps of the scientific method are to:
• Ask a Question
• Do Background Research
• Construct a Hypothesis
• Test Your Hypothesis by Doing an Experiment
• Analyze Your Data and Draw a Conclusion
• Communicate Your Results
The Scientific Method
The scientific method is a way to ask and answer
scientific questions by making observations and doing
experiments.
The steps of the scientific method are to:
• Ask a Question
• Do Background Research
• Construct a Hypothesis
• Test Your Hypothesis by Doing an Experiment
• Analyze Your Data and Draw a Conclusion
• Communicate Your Results
The Scientific Method
1. Asking questions (for science) and defining problems (for
engineering)
2. Developing and using models
3. Planning and carrying out investigations
4. Analyzing and interpreting data
5. Using mathematics and computational thinking
6. Constructing explanations (for science) and designing
solutions (for engineering)
7. Engaging in argument from evidence
8. Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information
The Practices of Science
and Engineering (SEPs)
1. Asking questions (for science) and defining problems (for
engineering)
2. Developing and using models
3. Planning and carrying out investigations
4. Analyzing and interpreting data
5. Using mathematics and computational thinking
6. Constructing explanations (for science) and designing
solutions (for engineering)
7. Engaging in argument from evidence
8. Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information
The Practices of Science
and Engineering (SEPs)
1. Asking questions (for science) and defining problems (for
engineering)
2. Developing and using models
3. Planning and carrying out investigations  data
4. Analyzing and interpreting data
5. Using mathematics and computational thinking
6. Constructing explanations (“from data”) and designing
solutions (for engineering)
7. Engaging in argument from evidence
8. Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information
The Practices of Science
and Engineering (SEPs)
1. Patterns
2. Cause and effect
3. Scale, proportion, and quantity
4. Systems and system models
5. Energy and matter
6. Structure and function
7. Stability and change
The Crosscutting Concepts
Structure and Dimension:
Both “Patterns” and “Scale, Proportion, and Quantity” are ways of
observing, categorizing, and classifying information, whether about
physical objects or phenomena.
The Crosscutting Concepts
Structure and Dimension:
Both “Patterns” and “Scale, Proportion, and Quantity” are ways of
observing, categorizing, and classifying information, whether about
physical objects or phenomena.
The Crosscutting Concepts
Structure and Dimension:
Both “Patterns” and “Scale, Proportion, and Quantity” are ways of
observing, categorizing, and classifying information, whether about
physical objects or phenomena.
The Crosscutting Concepts
Structure and Dimension:
Both “Patterns” and “Scale, Proportion, and Quantity” are ways of
observing, categorizing, and classifying information, whether about
physical objects or phenomena.
The Crosscutting Concepts
Structure and Dimension:
Both “Patterns” and “Scale, Proportion, and Quantity” are ways of
observing, categorizing, and classifying information, whether about
physical objects or phenomena.
The Crosscutting Concepts
Structure and Dimension:
Both “Patterns” and “Scale, Proportion, and Quantity” are ways of
observing, categorizing, and classifying information, whether about
physical objects or phenomena.
Causality of Components:
“Structure and Function” and “Cause and Effect” take a reductionist
view, focusing on processes of individual system components.
The Crosscutting Concepts
Understanding
how a radio
works:
Understanding
how a radio
works:
But will you hear
any music?
Structure and Dimension:
Both “Patterns” and “Scale, Proportion, and Quantity” are ways of
observing, categorizing, and classifying information, whether about
physical objects or phenomena.
Causality of Components:
“Structure and Function” and “Cause and Effect” take a reductionist
view, focusing on processes of individual system components.
Systems:
A holistic approach to science is exemplified by the crosscutting
concepts of “Systems and System Models,” “Energy and Matter,” and
“Stability and Change.” These all deal with understanding nature by
examining how components of a system function together.
The Crosscutting Concepts
The Crosscutting Concepts
Systems:
The Crosscutting Concepts
Systems:
The Crosscutting Concepts
Systems:
NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core
Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas
(and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core
Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas
(and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core
Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas
(and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core
Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas
(and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core
Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas
(and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core
Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas
(and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core
Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas
(and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core
Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas
(and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core
Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas
(and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core
Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas
(and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core
Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas
(and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core
Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas
(and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core
Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas
(and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core
Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas
(and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core
Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas
(and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
Informed Citizenry:
• STEM-related topics are directly related to peoples’ lives
(vaccinations, food content, environmental concerns)
• People are asked to vote based upon many STEM-
related topics (energy resources, natural hazard
mitigation, health care, etc.)
Importance of a STEM-literate public
Can reinforce and be reinforced by Math and English curricula!
MS-ESS3-2: Analyze and interpret data on natural hazards to
forecast future catastrophic events and inform the
development of technologies to mitigate their effects.
MS-ESS3-2: Analyze and interpret data on natural hazards to
forecast future catastrophic events and inform the
development of technologies to mitigate their effects.
[Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on how some natural hazards,
such as volcanic eruptions and severe weather, are preceded by
phenomena that allow for reliable predictions, but others, such as
earthquakes, occur suddenly and with no notice, and thus are not yet
predictable. Examples of natural hazards can be taken from interior
processes (such as earthquakes and volcanic eruptions), surface
processes (such as mass wasting and tsunamis), or severe weather
events (such as hurricanes, tornadoes, and floods). Examples of data
can include the locations, magnitudes, and frequencies of the natural
hazards. Examples of technologies can be global (such as satellite
systems to monitor hurricanes or forest fires) or local (such as building
basements in tornado-prone regions or reservoirs to mitigate
droughts).]
Pick ONE example! Not ALL!
California
MS-ESS3-2: Analyze and interpret data on natural hazards to
forecast future catastrophic events and inform the
development of technologies to mitigate their effects.
California
St. Louis
Oklahoma
MS-ESS3-2: Analyze and interpret data on natural hazards to
forecast future catastrophic events and inform the
development of technologies to mitigate their effects.
California
St. Louis
Chicago
MS-ESS3-2: Analyze and interpret data on natural hazards to
forecast future catastrophic events and inform the
development of technologies to mitigate their effects.
California
St. Louis
Seattle
MS-ESS3-2: Analyze and interpret data on natural hazards to
forecast future catastrophic events and inform the
development of technologies to mitigate their effects.
California
St. Louis
Florida
MS-ESS3-2: Analyze and interpret data on natural hazards to
forecast future catastrophic events and inform the
development of technologies to mitigate their effects.
California
St. Louis
FLORIDA St. Louis
MS-ESS3-2: Analyze and interpret data on natural hazards to
forecast future catastrophic events and inform the
development of technologies to mitigate their effects.
Science Content is More Coherent When It Is Incorporated
Into Integrated “Storylines:”
Example of “Bundling” Performance Expectations:
(High School) - Fossils and Evolution
Example of Bundling PEs: (High School) - Fossils and Evolution
Life Science:
HS-LS4-1: Communicate scientific information that common ancestry and
biological evolution are supported by multiple lines of empirical
evidence.
HS-LS4-5: Evaluate the evidence supporting claims that changes in
environmental conditions may result in: (1) increases in the number of
individuals of some species, (2) the emergence of new species over
time, and (3) the extinction of other species.
Example of Bundling PEs: (High School) - Fossils and Evolution
Example of Bundling PEs: (High School) - Fossils and Evolution
Earth Science:
MS-ESS1-4: Construct a scientific explanation based on evidence from
rock strata for how the geologic time scale is used to organize Earth’s
4.6-billion-year-old history.
HS-ESS1-6: Apply scientific reasoning and evidence from ancient Earth
materials, meteorites, and other planetary surfaces to construct an
account of Earth’s formation and early history.
Example of Bundling PEs: (High School) - Fossils and Evolution
Example of Bundling PEs: (High School) - Fossils and Evolution
Physical Science:
HS-PS1-8: Develop models to illustrate the changes in the composition of
the nucleus of the atom and the energy released during the processes
of fission, fusion, and radioactive decay.
Example of Bundling PEs: (High School) - Fossils and Evolution
Elementary School:
Grade-level; Integrated across all sciences
Middle School:
1 year of Life Science
1 year of Physical Science (Chemistry & Physics)
1 year of Earth and Space Science
High School:
1 year of Life Science
1 year of Physical Science (Chemistry & Physics)
1 year of Earth and Space Science
How would you arrange content in middle and high school?
Performance Expectations
Course Map #1: Conceptual Understanding Model
How would you construct a 6-12 curriculum around the NGSS,
given the amount and complexity of Earth and Space Science?
Course Map #1:
Conceptual
Understanding
Model:
Courses to be
constructed based
on the most
efficient and logical
progression of
concepts
Course Map #2: Science
Domains Model:
The 3 courses are
Physical Science, Life
Science, and Earth and
Space Science
(for both middle and high
school)
Course Map #3: Modified
Science Domains Model
(for high school):
Incorporate the Earth and
Space Science into
existing biology, chemistry,
and physics courses.
 Least efficient in terms
of instruction time;
concepts taught out of
order (without adequate
prerequisites)
Number of Years of High School Science Required:
1987 1996 2006 2011
Local Decision 6 7 8 5
1 – 2 Years 40 33 20 15
3 Years 3 8 21 30
4 Years 0 2 1 2
1987 – leaves off Vermont and Arkansas, which both required 5 total math or science years
1996 – still leaves off Vermont for the same reason; includes DC
2006, 2011 – all 50 states and DC
Number of Years of High School Science
Required by Different States
The NGSS were a “states-led” process
States that have already adopted the NGSS:
Arkansas, California, Delaware, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Nevada,
Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington State, West Virginia, Washington DC
(But also Oklahoma, Massachusetts, and many schools and districts in other
states and countries….)
……AND OTHER COUNTRIES ARE EXAMINING THEM.

More Related Content

PPTX
Introducing Teachers to the Next Generation Science Stand
PDF
Women in STEM Disciplines: Walking boundaries
PDF
Evolution
PPTX
NGSS Earth and Space Science: Needs and a Call to Action
PDF
Ngss poster
PPT
Cer power point
PPTX
Claims + evidence + reasoning explanation
PPTX
NSTA Resources for NGSS in the Earth and Space Sciences
Introducing Teachers to the Next Generation Science Stand
Women in STEM Disciplines: Walking boundaries
Evolution
NGSS Earth and Space Science: Needs and a Call to Action
Ngss poster
Cer power point
Claims + evidence + reasoning explanation
NSTA Resources for NGSS in the Earth and Space Sciences

Viewers also liked (20)

PPTX
Webinar: Building a State Coalition for NGSS-ESS
PPTX
Applying Formative Assessment Strategies 1 & 5 to the NGSS
PPTX
Supporting Elementary Teachers with the NGSS
PPTX
NGSS: Chris Embry Mohr
PPTX
Education for Sustainability with the NGSS
PPTX
NGSS Simplified: A Guide to Understanding the new Next Generation Science Sta...
PPT
NGSS Chemistry Webinar
PPTX
NSTA15: Performance-Based Portfolio Assessment of the NGSS
PPTX
Introduction to NGSS - Next Generation Science Standards
PPT
نظريات التعلم السلوكية
PPT
الالعاب التربوية ( Activities Book )
PDF
STEAM IT Up with the 8Cs
PDF
The 5 C's of College Choice
PDF
The 30 Goals Challenge for Teachers
PDF
Critical pedagogy: education in the practice of freedom
PDF
Literacy Reimagined
PDF
The 50 Most Influential Education Brands on LinkedIn
PDF
The Now and Next of Learning and Technology
PDF
10 tips for learning Russian
PDF
Are Traditional Teaching Methods Right for Today's Students
Webinar: Building a State Coalition for NGSS-ESS
Applying Formative Assessment Strategies 1 & 5 to the NGSS
Supporting Elementary Teachers with the NGSS
NGSS: Chris Embry Mohr
Education for Sustainability with the NGSS
NGSS Simplified: A Guide to Understanding the new Next Generation Science Sta...
NGSS Chemistry Webinar
NSTA15: Performance-Based Portfolio Assessment of the NGSS
Introduction to NGSS - Next Generation Science Standards
نظريات التعلم السلوكية
الالعاب التربوية ( Activities Book )
STEAM IT Up with the 8Cs
The 5 C's of College Choice
The 30 Goals Challenge for Teachers
Critical pedagogy: education in the practice of freedom
Literacy Reimagined
The 50 Most Influential Education Brands on LinkedIn
The Now and Next of Learning and Technology
10 tips for learning Russian
Are Traditional Teaching Methods Right for Today's Students
Ad

Similar to NGSS Earth and Space Science (20)

PDF
Nature-of-Science.pdf
PPT
Inquiryintro
PDF
Assessing inquiry
PPT
1 ngss 9-12
PPT
Getting Reading for the Next Generation Science Standards Part 3: Crosscuttin...
PPTX
Chapter 1
PPTX
Using QR Coding to Facilitate Student Engagement and Differentiation in the C...
PPT
Getting Ready for the Next Gen Science Standards: Science and Engineering Pra...
PPTX
TMPHY22 PPT_ As of Mrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrarch 11, 2025.pptx
PDF
NH Next Gen Science Workshop
PPTX
Chapter 1
PPTX
Design of learning experiences for science teaching & faculty development - W...
PPTX
Using Semantics of Textbook Highlights to Predict Student Comprehension and K...
PPT
bennnnkkjgeswaqopfkhrkdofogfdhhgddrtykjgur.ppt
PPT
Civic Scientific Literacy: A Survival Tool for the 21st Century
PDF
IDS Impact, Innovation and Learning Workshop March 2013: Day 2, Paper Session...
PPTX
Introduction to qualitative research and nvivo 12
PPTX
Webinar 2: The building blocks of Epistemic Insight.
PPT
Refining research question2010
PPTX
ENV management - Introduction Powerpoint
Nature-of-Science.pdf
Inquiryintro
Assessing inquiry
1 ngss 9-12
Getting Reading for the Next Generation Science Standards Part 3: Crosscuttin...
Chapter 1
Using QR Coding to Facilitate Student Engagement and Differentiation in the C...
Getting Ready for the Next Gen Science Standards: Science and Engineering Pra...
TMPHY22 PPT_ As of Mrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrarch 11, 2025.pptx
NH Next Gen Science Workshop
Chapter 1
Design of learning experiences for science teaching & faculty development - W...
Using Semantics of Textbook Highlights to Predict Student Comprehension and K...
bennnnkkjgeswaqopfkhrkdofogfdhhgddrtykjgur.ppt
Civic Scientific Literacy: A Survival Tool for the 21st Century
IDS Impact, Innovation and Learning Workshop March 2013: Day 2, Paper Session...
Introduction to qualitative research and nvivo 12
Webinar 2: The building blocks of Epistemic Insight.
Refining research question2010
ENV management - Introduction Powerpoint
Ad

More from SERC at Carleton College (20)

PPTX
StatVignette03_Sig.Figs_v04_07_15_2020.pptx
PPTX
StatVignette06_HypTesting.pptx
PPTX
Unit 1 (optional slides)
PPTX
Cretaceous Coatlines and Modern Voting Patterns Presentation
PPTX
Climate and Biomes PPT 2
PPTX
weather tracking ppt
PPTX
Presentation: Unit 1 Introduction to the hydrological cycle
PPTX
StatVignette05_M3_v02_10_21_2020.pptx
PPTX
KSKL chapter 8 PPT
PPTX
KSKL chap 5 PPT
PPTX
KSKL_Chapter 4_ Chem Properties of Soils.pptx
PPTX
Degraded Soil Images.pptx
PPTX
Educators PPT file chapter 7
PPTX
Educators PPT file chapter 2
PPTX
Educators PPT file chapter 6
PPTX
Educators PPT chapter 3
PPTX
Unit 4 background presentation
PPTX
Presentation: Unit 3 background information
PPTX
Presentation: Unit 2 Measuring Groundwater Background Information
PPTX
Introduction to GPS presentation
StatVignette03_Sig.Figs_v04_07_15_2020.pptx
StatVignette06_HypTesting.pptx
Unit 1 (optional slides)
Cretaceous Coatlines and Modern Voting Patterns Presentation
Climate and Biomes PPT 2
weather tracking ppt
Presentation: Unit 1 Introduction to the hydrological cycle
StatVignette05_M3_v02_10_21_2020.pptx
KSKL chapter 8 PPT
KSKL chap 5 PPT
KSKL_Chapter 4_ Chem Properties of Soils.pptx
Degraded Soil Images.pptx
Educators PPT file chapter 7
Educators PPT file chapter 2
Educators PPT file chapter 6
Educators PPT chapter 3
Unit 4 background presentation
Presentation: Unit 3 background information
Presentation: Unit 2 Measuring Groundwater Background Information
Introduction to GPS presentation

NGSS Earth and Space Science

  • 1. Professor Michael Wysession Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Next Generation Science Standards: What They Mean for Earth and Space Science
  • 2. In 2006, what percentage of Americans said that they thought genetics and evolution were real? a) 40% b) 50% c) 60% d) 70% e) 80%
  • 3. In 2006, what percentage of Americans said that they thought genetics and evolution were real? a) 40%  b) 50% c) 60% d) 70% e) 80%
  • 4. In 2006, what percentage of Americans said that they thought genetics and evolution were real? a) 40%  b) 50% c) 60% d) 70% e) 80% Out of 34 countries surveyed, only Turkey had a lower percentage.
  • 5. Program for International Student Assessment (PISA): 2012
  • 6. 1. The U.S. has an active and productive graduate-level science research infrastructure 2. The U.S. has a public that is below average in its appreciation and understanding of science
  • 7. 1. The U.S. has an active and productive graduate-level science research infrastructure 2. The U.S. has a public that is below average in its appreciation and understanding of science These two statements are not compatible in the long term
  • 8. 1. The U.S. has an active and productive graduate-level science research infrastructure 2. The U.S. has a public that is below average in its appreciation and understanding of science These two statements are not compatible in the long term Story of the juice box: Prof. David Hammer Physics Department University of Maryland
  • 9. In what year were the first science standards used for secondary education in the US? a) 1852 b) 1893 c) 1965 d) 1995 e) 2013
  • 10. In what year were the first science standards used for secondary education in the US? a) 1852  b) 1893 c) 1965 d) 1995 e) 2013
  • 11. Following what year did high school science primarily consist of biology, chemistry, and physics, omitting geology and astronomy? a) 1852 b) 1893 c) 1965 d) 1995 e) 2013
  • 12. Following what year did high school science primarily consist of biology, chemistry, and physics, omitting geology and astronomy? a) 1852 b) 1893  c) 1965 d) 1995 e) 2013
  • 14. Are Science “Standards” Effective? • Most science standards are content based  Lead to a memorization of factoids
  • 15. Are Science “Standards” Effective? • Most science standards are content based  Lead to a memorization of factoids • Drive “Teach to the Test” school practices
  • 16. Are Science “Standards” Effective? • Most science standards are content based  Lead to a memorization of factoids • Drive “Teach to the Test” school practices • “A mile wide and and an inch deep” (too much content!)
  • 17. Are Science “Standards” Effective? • Most science standards are content based  Lead to a memorization of factoids • Drive “Teach to the Test” school practices • “A mile wide and and an inch deep” (too much content!) • Encourage courses about science and not science courses
  • 18. Are Science “Standards” Effective? • Most science standards are content based  Lead to a memorization of factoids • Drive “Teach to the Test” school practices • “A mile wide and and an inch deep” (too much content!) • Encourage courses about science and not science courses • Boring!
  • 19. Teaching kids to play baseball and softball….
  • 20. Teaching kids to play baseball and softball….
  • 21. [NRC, 2007] [NRC, 2007] Educational Research promotes Active Learning
  • 22. [Center on Continuous Instructional Improvement, 2009] [NRC, 2012]
  • 24. A report by the National Research Council of the National Academies of Science Completed 2011 Published 2012 NRC Framework: Three Dimensions of (1) Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs), (2) Science and Engineering Practices (SEPs), and Crosscutting Concepts (CCCs)
  • 25. In what year were the first US national science K-12 standards adopted? a) 1893 b) 1965 c) 1995 d) 2013 e) Never
  • 26. In what year were the first US national science K-12 standards adopted? a) 1893 b) 1965 c) 1995 d) 2013 e) Never 
  • 27. The 1965 Elementary and Secondary Education Act, signed by President Lyndon Johnson as part of his “War on Poverty.”  Expressly forbids a national curriculum.
  • 28. The NGSS were a “states-led” process States that have already adopted the NGSS: Arkansas, California, Delaware, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington State, West Virginia, Washington DC (But also Oklahoma, Massachusetts, and many schools and districts in other states and countries….)
  • 31. NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas
  • 37. Not all DCIs are in the NGSS!
  • 38. How is this document different from the NSES? [NRC, 1996] [NRC, 2012]
  • 39. How is this document different from the NSES? [NRC, 1996] [NRC, 2012] [Natl. Acad. Press, 2013]
  • 40. NGSS Earth and Space Science Writing Team Members: Michael Wysession Mary Colson Richard Duschl Kenneth Huff Paula Mussina Paul Speranza The NGSS ESS Writing Team
  • 46. Elementary School: Grade-level; Integrated across all sciences Middle School: 1 year of Life Science 1 year of Physical Science (Chemistry & Physics) 1 year of Earth and Space Science High School: 1 year of Life Science 1 year of Physical Science (Chemistry & Physics) 1 year of Earth and Space Science Performance Expectations
  • 47. How do you Teach Earth and Space Science with the NGSS? PRACTICES CONTENT X-CUTTING CONCEPTS
  • 48. The scientific method is a way to ask and answer scientific questions by making observations and doing experiments. The steps of the scientific method are to: • Ask a Question • Do Background Research • Construct a Hypothesis • Test Your Hypothesis by Doing an Experiment • Analyze Your Data and Draw a Conclusion • Communicate Your Results The Scientific Method
  • 49. The scientific method is a way to ask and answer scientific questions by making observations and doing experiments. The steps of the scientific method are to: • Ask a Question • Do Background Research • Construct a Hypothesis • Test Your Hypothesis by Doing an Experiment • Analyze Your Data and Draw a Conclusion • Communicate Your Results The Scientific Method
  • 50. 1. Asking questions (for science) and defining problems (for engineering) 2. Developing and using models 3. Planning and carrying out investigations 4. Analyzing and interpreting data 5. Using mathematics and computational thinking 6. Constructing explanations (for science) and designing solutions (for engineering) 7. Engaging in argument from evidence 8. Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information The Practices of Science and Engineering (SEPs)
  • 51. 1. Asking questions (for science) and defining problems (for engineering) 2. Developing and using models 3. Planning and carrying out investigations 4. Analyzing and interpreting data 5. Using mathematics and computational thinking 6. Constructing explanations (for science) and designing solutions (for engineering) 7. Engaging in argument from evidence 8. Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information The Practices of Science and Engineering (SEPs)
  • 52. 1. Asking questions (for science) and defining problems (for engineering) 2. Developing and using models 3. Planning and carrying out investigations  data 4. Analyzing and interpreting data 5. Using mathematics and computational thinking 6. Constructing explanations (“from data”) and designing solutions (for engineering) 7. Engaging in argument from evidence 8. Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information The Practices of Science and Engineering (SEPs)
  • 53. 1. Patterns 2. Cause and effect 3. Scale, proportion, and quantity 4. Systems and system models 5. Energy and matter 6. Structure and function 7. Stability and change The Crosscutting Concepts
  • 54. Structure and Dimension: Both “Patterns” and “Scale, Proportion, and Quantity” are ways of observing, categorizing, and classifying information, whether about physical objects or phenomena. The Crosscutting Concepts
  • 55. Structure and Dimension: Both “Patterns” and “Scale, Proportion, and Quantity” are ways of observing, categorizing, and classifying information, whether about physical objects or phenomena. The Crosscutting Concepts
  • 56. Structure and Dimension: Both “Patterns” and “Scale, Proportion, and Quantity” are ways of observing, categorizing, and classifying information, whether about physical objects or phenomena. The Crosscutting Concepts
  • 57. Structure and Dimension: Both “Patterns” and “Scale, Proportion, and Quantity” are ways of observing, categorizing, and classifying information, whether about physical objects or phenomena. The Crosscutting Concepts
  • 58. Structure and Dimension: Both “Patterns” and “Scale, Proportion, and Quantity” are ways of observing, categorizing, and classifying information, whether about physical objects or phenomena. The Crosscutting Concepts
  • 59. Structure and Dimension: Both “Patterns” and “Scale, Proportion, and Quantity” are ways of observing, categorizing, and classifying information, whether about physical objects or phenomena. Causality of Components: “Structure and Function” and “Cause and Effect” take a reductionist view, focusing on processes of individual system components. The Crosscutting Concepts
  • 61. Understanding how a radio works: But will you hear any music?
  • 62. Structure and Dimension: Both “Patterns” and “Scale, Proportion, and Quantity” are ways of observing, categorizing, and classifying information, whether about physical objects or phenomena. Causality of Components: “Structure and Function” and “Cause and Effect” take a reductionist view, focusing on processes of individual system components. Systems: A holistic approach to science is exemplified by the crosscutting concepts of “Systems and System Models,” “Energy and Matter,” and “Stability and Change.” These all deal with understanding nature by examining how components of a system function together. The Crosscutting Concepts
  • 66. NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas (and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
  • 67. NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas (and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
  • 68. NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas (and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
  • 69. NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas (and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
  • 70. NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas (and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
  • 71. NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas (and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
  • 72. NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas (and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
  • 73. NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas (and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
  • 74. NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas (and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
  • 75. NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas (and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
  • 76. NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas (and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
  • 77. NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas (and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
  • 78. NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas (and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
  • 79. NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas (and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
  • 80. NRC Framework: The Content of Science (“Disciplinary Core Ideas”) is Organized into Three Areas (and also Science, Technology, and Engineering)
  • 81. Informed Citizenry: • STEM-related topics are directly related to peoples’ lives (vaccinations, food content, environmental concerns) • People are asked to vote based upon many STEM- related topics (energy resources, natural hazard mitigation, health care, etc.) Importance of a STEM-literate public
  • 82. Can reinforce and be reinforced by Math and English curricula!
  • 83. MS-ESS3-2: Analyze and interpret data on natural hazards to forecast future catastrophic events and inform the development of technologies to mitigate their effects.
  • 84. MS-ESS3-2: Analyze and interpret data on natural hazards to forecast future catastrophic events and inform the development of technologies to mitigate their effects. [Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on how some natural hazards, such as volcanic eruptions and severe weather, are preceded by phenomena that allow for reliable predictions, but others, such as earthquakes, occur suddenly and with no notice, and thus are not yet predictable. Examples of natural hazards can be taken from interior processes (such as earthquakes and volcanic eruptions), surface processes (such as mass wasting and tsunamis), or severe weather events (such as hurricanes, tornadoes, and floods). Examples of data can include the locations, magnitudes, and frequencies of the natural hazards. Examples of technologies can be global (such as satellite systems to monitor hurricanes or forest fires) or local (such as building basements in tornado-prone regions or reservoirs to mitigate droughts).] Pick ONE example! Not ALL!
  • 85. California MS-ESS3-2: Analyze and interpret data on natural hazards to forecast future catastrophic events and inform the development of technologies to mitigate their effects.
  • 86. California St. Louis Oklahoma MS-ESS3-2: Analyze and interpret data on natural hazards to forecast future catastrophic events and inform the development of technologies to mitigate their effects.
  • 87. California St. Louis Chicago MS-ESS3-2: Analyze and interpret data on natural hazards to forecast future catastrophic events and inform the development of technologies to mitigate their effects.
  • 88. California St. Louis Seattle MS-ESS3-2: Analyze and interpret data on natural hazards to forecast future catastrophic events and inform the development of technologies to mitigate their effects.
  • 89. California St. Louis Florida MS-ESS3-2: Analyze and interpret data on natural hazards to forecast future catastrophic events and inform the development of technologies to mitigate their effects.
  • 90. California St. Louis FLORIDA St. Louis MS-ESS3-2: Analyze and interpret data on natural hazards to forecast future catastrophic events and inform the development of technologies to mitigate their effects.
  • 91. Science Content is More Coherent When It Is Incorporated Into Integrated “Storylines:” Example of “Bundling” Performance Expectations: (High School) - Fossils and Evolution
  • 92. Example of Bundling PEs: (High School) - Fossils and Evolution Life Science: HS-LS4-1: Communicate scientific information that common ancestry and biological evolution are supported by multiple lines of empirical evidence. HS-LS4-5: Evaluate the evidence supporting claims that changes in environmental conditions may result in: (1) increases in the number of individuals of some species, (2) the emergence of new species over time, and (3) the extinction of other species. Example of Bundling PEs: (High School) - Fossils and Evolution
  • 93. Example of Bundling PEs: (High School) - Fossils and Evolution Earth Science: MS-ESS1-4: Construct a scientific explanation based on evidence from rock strata for how the geologic time scale is used to organize Earth’s 4.6-billion-year-old history. HS-ESS1-6: Apply scientific reasoning and evidence from ancient Earth materials, meteorites, and other planetary surfaces to construct an account of Earth’s formation and early history. Example of Bundling PEs: (High School) - Fossils and Evolution
  • 94. Example of Bundling PEs: (High School) - Fossils and Evolution Physical Science: HS-PS1-8: Develop models to illustrate the changes in the composition of the nucleus of the atom and the energy released during the processes of fission, fusion, and radioactive decay. Example of Bundling PEs: (High School) - Fossils and Evolution
  • 95. Elementary School: Grade-level; Integrated across all sciences Middle School: 1 year of Life Science 1 year of Physical Science (Chemistry & Physics) 1 year of Earth and Space Science High School: 1 year of Life Science 1 year of Physical Science (Chemistry & Physics) 1 year of Earth and Space Science How would you arrange content in middle and high school? Performance Expectations
  • 96. Course Map #1: Conceptual Understanding Model How would you construct a 6-12 curriculum around the NGSS, given the amount and complexity of Earth and Space Science?
  • 97. Course Map #1: Conceptual Understanding Model: Courses to be constructed based on the most efficient and logical progression of concepts
  • 98. Course Map #2: Science Domains Model: The 3 courses are Physical Science, Life Science, and Earth and Space Science (for both middle and high school)
  • 99. Course Map #3: Modified Science Domains Model (for high school): Incorporate the Earth and Space Science into existing biology, chemistry, and physics courses.  Least efficient in terms of instruction time; concepts taught out of order (without adequate prerequisites)
  • 100. Number of Years of High School Science Required: 1987 1996 2006 2011 Local Decision 6 7 8 5 1 – 2 Years 40 33 20 15 3 Years 3 8 21 30 4 Years 0 2 1 2 1987 – leaves off Vermont and Arkansas, which both required 5 total math or science years 1996 – still leaves off Vermont for the same reason; includes DC 2006, 2011 – all 50 states and DC Number of Years of High School Science Required by Different States
  • 101. The NGSS were a “states-led” process States that have already adopted the NGSS: Arkansas, California, Delaware, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington State, West Virginia, Washington DC (But also Oklahoma, Massachusetts, and many schools and districts in other states and countries….) ……AND OTHER COUNTRIES ARE EXAMINING THEM.