Nitrate Reductases: Structure, Functions, and Effect of Stress Factors

Nitrogen is a constituent of main macromolecules—
proteins and nucleic acids—and is one of most vitally
important elements on Earth. It is incorporated into com-
pounds in different degrees of oxidation (from N5+
to N3–
),
the interconversions of which define the global biochemi-
cal cycle of nitrogen. Inorganic nitrogen is converted to the
biologically useful form during nitrogen fixation and
assimilation that provide for nitrogen incorporation into
the carbon backbone of organic compounds. Processes of
nitrification (oxidative conversion of ammonium to
nitrate) and denitrification (successive nitrate reduction to
nitrite, nitrogen oxides (NO and N2O)) are involved in
nitrogen removal from the environment (Fig. 1).
Nitrate reduction, the most important stage of nitro-
gen turnover in nature, has several functions: i) utilization
of NO3
–
as a source of nitrogen (nitrate assimilation); ii)
production of metabolic energy during NO3
–
utilization as
terminal acceptor of electrons (nitrate respiration), and
iii) dissipation of excess of reducing energy to maintain
oxidation–reduction balance (nitrate dissimilation).
The first, most important stage in the chain of nitrate
reduction to nitrites is catalyzed by nitrate reductase
(NRase). There are four types of NRases—eukaryotic
assimilatory NRase (Euk-NR) [1, 2] and three different
bacterial enzymes, i.e. cytoplasmic assimilatory (Nas),
membrane-bound respiratory (Nar), and periplasmic dis-
similatory (Nap) NRases [3-6] (Fig. 2).
As a rule, all studied NRases share a common prop-
erty—the presence of molybdenum (Mo) and molybde-
num cofactor (Mo-co) in the enzyme active center.
Bacterial NRases contain molybdopterin-guanine dinu-
cleotide (MGD), whereas mononucleotide is present in
the active center of eukaryotic NRases.
In bacterial MGD-binding subunit, molybdenum
can be coordinated by four thiolate ligands located in two
MGD halves (Fig. 3a). Molybdenum is additionally coor-
dinated by –S, –O, or –Se bonds of cysteine, serine, or
selenocysteine residues of the polypeptide chain, as well as
by accessible oxo (–O) and hydroxo (–OH) groups or by
water (Fig. 3b) in different molybdenum enzymes [7-10].
Reactions catalyzed by dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)
and trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) reductases follow
the oxo-transferase mechanism, in which oxo-group on
the oxidized ion Mo(VI) loses OH–
/H2O upon reduction
to Mo(IV). Nitrate is able to bind Mo in the reduced state
and undergo reduction to nitrite, which regenerates the
oxo-group on release of Mo(VI) (Fig. 4).
Structures of some catalytic subunits of such MGD
family members as formate reductase [8], DMSO reduc-
tase [10], TMAO reductase [9], and Nap from D. desul-
furomonas [7] have been revealed. However, the number of
Mo-bound oxo-groups still attracts attention of
ISSN 0006-2979, Biochemistry (Moscow), 2007, Vol. 72, No. 10, pp. 1151-1160. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2007.
Original Russian Text © E. V. Morozkina, R. A. Zvyagilskaya, 2007, published in Biokhimiya, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 10, pp. 1413-1424.
REVIEW
1151
Abbreviations: DMSO) dimethyl sulfoxide; Euk-NR) eukaryot-
ic assimilatory NRase; MGD) molybdopterin-guanine dinu-
cleotide; Mo) molybdenum; Mo-co) molybdenum cofactor;
Nap) periplasmic dissimilatory NRase; Nar) membrane-bound
respiratory NRase; Nas) cytoplasmic assimilatory NRase;
NRase) nitrate reductase; TMAO) trimethylamine N-oxide.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nitrate Reductases: Structure, Functions,
and Effect of Stress Factors
E. V. Morozkina* and R. A. Zvyagilskaya
Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky pr. 33,
119071 Moscow, Russia; fax: (495) 954-2732; E-mail: Chicelena@yandex.ru
Received July 14, 2007
Abstract—Structural and functional peculiarities of four types of nitrate reductases are considered: assimilatory nitrate reduc-
tase of eukaryotes, as well as cytoplasmic assimilatory, membrane-bound respiratory, and periplasmic dissimilatory bacterial
nitrate reductases. Arguments are presented showing that eukaryotic organisms are capable of nitrate dissimilation. Data con-
cerning new classes of extremophil nitrate reductases, whose active center does not contain molybdocofactor, are summarized.
DOI: 10.1134/S0006297907100124
Key words: nitrate reductase, nitrification, denitrification, molybdenum, molybdenum cofactor, molybdopterin-guanine
dinucleotides, stress

1152 MOROZKINA, ZVYAGILSKAYA
BIOCHEMISTRY (Moscow) Vol. 72 No. 10 2007
researchers. Studying periplasmic NRase (Nap) in P. pan-
totrophus by EXAFS (Extended X-ray Absorption Fine
Structure) pointed to the existence of di-oxo-condition in
Mo(VI) [11], whereas the Nap crystalline structure in D.
desulfuricans suggests mono-oxo condition in Mo(VI). It
should be noted that the amino acid sequence of Nap from
D. desulfuricans is similar to that of assimilatory enzymes.
There are a number of serine residues that increase the
probability of Mo–O–Ser ligands in Nar compared with
formation of Mo–S–Cys ligands found for Nap [7] and
predicted for Nas. Structural and molecular-genetic pecu-
liarities of different type NRases will be considered below.
ASSIMILATORY BACTERIAL NITRATE
REDUCTASE (Nas)
Two classes of assimilatory NRases have been found
in bacteria: ferredoxin- or flavodoxin-dependent Nas and
NADH-dependent Nas, the classification of which is
based on the cofactor structure (Fig. 5).
Ferredoxin- or flavodoxin-dependent bacterial and
cyanobacterial NRases contain in their active center Mo-
co and [Fe-S] clusters and are devoid of FAD or
cytochromes [12, 13]. NRases from Azotobacter vinelandii
and Plectonema boryanum consist of a single 105 kD sub-
unit incorporating a [4Fe-4S] center and molybdenum (1
atom/molecule) and use flavodoxin as a physiological
donor of electrons [14]. Analysis of amino acid sequence
of these enzymes has shown the presence of cysteine
residues at the N-terminus, which evidently binds the
[4Fe-4S] center. Ferredoxin-dependent NRases have
been found in A. chroococcum, Clostridium perfringens,
and Ectothiorhodospira shaposhnikovii [1].
NADH-dependent NRases of Klebsiella oxytoca
(pneumoniae) and Rhodobacter capsulatus are het-
erodimers consisting of the diaphorase FAD-containing
subunit of 45 kD and a catalytic subunit of 95 kD with
molybdenum cofactor and N-terminal [4Fe-4S] center
[15]. Besides, NRase of Klebsiella oxytoca (pneumoniae)
contains an additional [2Fe-2S] center bound to a C-ter-
minal cluster of cysteine residues, which resembles by its
amino acid sequence the NifU protein, the nifU gene
product, involved in formation of [Fe-S] clusters in the
nitrogenase active center [16].
This region is absent from the ferredoxin-dependent
NRase, whereas in the NADH-dependent NRases it may
play the role of the ferredoxin-similar domain carrying
out electron transfer. The NADH-dependent NRase of
Bacillus subtilis does not contain the NifU-like domain in
the catalytic subunit, but contains two tandem NifU-like
regions in the diaphorase subunit, which may be involved
in [4Fe-4S] or [3Fe-4S] binding [17].
Regulatory and structural genes responsible for
nitrate and nitrite uptake (transfer) and reduction are
usually located in the same operon. The nasFEDCBA
operon of K. oxytoca M5al encodes proteins responsible
for nitrate and nitrite assimilation [18, 19], and in this
case genes nasFED encode a periplasmic carrier that pro-
vides for nitrate and nitrite transfer [19], the NADH-
dependent NRase is encoded by genes nasC (diaphorase
subunit) and nasA (catalytic subunit), whereas gene nasB
is responsible for assimilatory nitrite reductase [20].
The operon encoding enzymes responsible for
nitrate assimilation is also well-studied and characterized
in A. vinelandii. Structural genes encoding flavodoxin-
dependent NRase of A. vinelandii (nasB) are transcribed
together with gene nasA responsible for synthesis of nitrite
reductase [20]. In most other studied bacteria, genes nirA,
nrtABCD, and narB, responsible, respectively, for NRase
Fig. 1. Biogeochemical cycle of nitrogen turnover.
–3 –1 +1 +3 +5
N2 N2O
NO2
–
NH4
+ NO3
–
NO2
–
NO2
–
Nitrogen fixation Denitrification
assimilatory and dissimilatory
nitrate reduction
nitrification
electron donor required
electron acceptor required
Fig. 2. Reactions of nitrogen reduction in pro- and eukaryotes.
NONO3
–
NO2
–
Denitrification
NarG or NapA
N2O N2
Dissimilatory reduction of nitrate to ammonium
NO3
– NarG Nir NH3NO2
–
NO3
– NapA Nir NH3NO2
–
Assimilatory reduction of nitrate to ammonium
Eucaryotes
NO3
– Euk-NR
Nir
NH3NO2
–
Procaryotes
NO3
–
Nir
NH3NO2
–Nas

NITRATE REDUCTASES: STRUCTURE, FUNCTIONS, AND EFFECT OF STRESS FACTORS 1153
synthesis, nitrate transport, and nitrite reductase synthe-
sis, make up a single operon [21, 22].
Nitrate transport into a cell involves carriers of the
NarK family and ATP-dependent transporters of the
ABC family (ATP-binding cassette transporters) [18, 23].
Bacillus subtilis is able to grow using nitrate as a
unique source of nitrogen. Assimilatory nitrate and nitrite
reductases are encoded by the locus containing genes
nasABCDEF. The nasA gene mutant was not able to grow
Fig. 3. Structure of molybdopterin-guanine-dinucleotide cofactor (MGD cofactor) (a) and active center of NRase (b): I, eukaryotic (Euk-
Nar); II, periplasmic (Nap); III, membrane-bound (Nar).
H2N
P
P P
N
H
N
N
H
HN
O
O
O O O
O–
O–
S
S
Mo
P
O O
S
S
H
N
N
H
O
O
O O O
O–
O–
O
H2N
HN
N
N
N
H
H H
H
O
HO HO
NH
O O
OH OH
HH
HN
N NH2
N
N N NH2
NH
O
O O
S S
SS
Mo
Ser
III
O
Mo
S
SS
S
S
Cys
II
Mo
S
S
S
O
O
Cys
I
a
b
Fig. 4. Scheme of catalytic cycle of nitrate reduction by Nap of P.
denitrificans.
NO3
–
NO2
–
ОNO2
–
OOO O
Н2O
Мо
(VI)
Мо
(IV)
Мо
(IV)3е– – 2Н
O
Fig. 5. Organization of genes encoding nitrate assimilation in bac-
teria Klebsiella oxytoca and Synechococcus PCC7942.
Klebsiella oxytoca
NO3
–
NO2
–
NO3
–
NO3
–
NO3
–
NO2
–
NH4
+
NH4
+
Synechococcus sp. PCC4972
R F E D C B A
periplasm
ntsB nirB nirA nrtaDCD narB
NasFED NrtABCD
NasA
NasC
NasB
NarB
NirA
Fd
cytoplasm
NAD(P)H
ATP ATP
MGD
4Fe4S
MGD
2Fe2S
4Fe4S FAD
2Fe2S
2Fe2S
FAD
4Fe4S
Fe Fe 4Fe4S

on nitrate, but could grow on nitrite, thus indicating that
the NasA protein belongs to the family of the nitrogen
oxo-anion transporters (NarK) and is responsible for
nitrate transport. NasA homologs were also found in A.
aeolicus [24] and Ps. aeruginosa [25].
In Klebsiella and Synechococcus species the ATP-
dependent assimilatory uptake of nitrates with involve-
ment of ABC transporters is functioning. The transport
systems are encoded by nasFED genes in K. oxytoca [16,
19, 26] and by genes nrtABCD in Synechococcus sp.
PCC7942 [22]. Genes nasD, nrtD, and nrtC encode cyto-
plasmic protein subunits incorporating ATP-binding sites
of ABC transporters. Genes nasE and nrtB encode an
integral membrane subunit responsible for formation of a
channel for nitrate (and nitrite) transport through the
cytoplasmic membrane.
The level of nas gene transcription in enterobacteria
is under double control, namely, it is the repression by
ammonium via the general system of nitrogen regulation
(Ntr) and specific induction by nitrate or nitrite [18, 26].
In the photosynthesizing bacterium R. capsulatus assimi-
latory NRase is induced by nitrate and repressed by low
C/N ratio [27]. Positive regulation by nitrate requires
nitrate reduction to nitrite, evidently the real activator of
the nitrate assimilation gene transcription [28, 29].
BACTERIAL RESPIRATORY
MEMBRANE-BOUND
NITRATE REDUCTASE (Nar)
The main membrane-bound NRase (NarGHI) is
widespread among enterobacteria and is well studied in E.
coli [30]. The enzyme consists of three subunits (α, β, and
γ) and several cofactors and participates in creation of
transmembrane proton gradient, which is coupled with
nitrate reduction. It has been shown that subunits α and
β are localized in the cytoplasm, whereas subunit γ is
localized in the membrane and performs the attachment
of subunits α and β to the cytoplasmic side of the internal
membrane (Fig. 6).
The 19-28-kD subunit γ encoded by the narI gene is
a hydrophobic protein that forms five transmembrane α-
helical domains with N-terminus located in the periplasm
and C-terminus located in the cytoplasm and containing
two b-type hemes [31, 32]. The high-potential heme is
adjacent to the cytoplasmic side of the membrane, where-
as the low-potential heme is localized in the periplasm.
Subunit γ obtains electrons from quinone and transfers
them using b-hemes onto subunit β via appropriate
chains of histidine ligands [33]. Quinone pool oxidation
at the membrane periplasmic side forms a transmem-
brane electrochemical gradient used for ATP formation
with involvement of ATP synthase [34].
Subunit β (43-63 kD) encoded by narH gene is a
globular protein incorporating [Fe-S] clusters. One [3Fe-
4S] and three [4Fe-4S] clusters with different oxida-
tion–reduction potentials were detected by EPR in the αβ
complex isolated from E. coli. The high potential centers
[3Fe-4S] and [4Fe-4S] have the oxidation–reduction
potential of +60 and +80 mV, respectively, whereas two
low-potential centers [4Fe-4S] have oxidation–reduction
potentials of –200 and –400 mV, respectively [35]. It has
been supposed recently that only high-potential clusters
are able, for thermodynamic reasons, to transfer electrons,
whereas the role of the other two clusters is still unknown.
Subunit α (104-150 kD) coded by the narG gene
contains the [4Fe-4S] cluster and molybdenum cofactor,
just on which the nitrate reduction takes place [36].
Molybdenum can exist as Mo(VI), Mo(V), or Mo(IV),
and at a low and high pH levels there is pH-dependent
equilibrium between forms. X-Ray absorption spec-
troscopy has detected only a single Mo=O group in
NarGHI protein of E. coli. These results agree well with
data obtained during studies of crystalline structure of
DMSO reductase of Rhodobacter sphaeroides [37].
Structural analysis of the molybdenum center of NarGHI
suggests that the enzyme can be a member of the same
family of mononuclear molybdenum enzymes like
DMSO reductase [38]. Comparison of amino acid
sequence of NarGHI with available databases using the
BLOCK algorithm [39] has revealed a number of con-
served regions characteristic of all prokaryotic molyb-
dopterin-containing oxidoreductases. Three out of four
conserved cysteine residues, found in molybdopterin-
guanidine-dinucleotide-binding proteins, are located at
the N-terminus of the NarGHI α subunit.
Fig. 6. Organization of genes encoding for proteins of dissimilato-
ry membrane-bound bacterial nitrate reductase.
E. coli narA
2H+
NO3
–
NO2
–
M. tuberculosis
L X K G H J I G H J I
NarL
Periplasm
NO3
–
P. aeruginosa
L X K1 K2 G H J I
Cytoplasm
NarK
NarI
NarH
NarX
NarJ
NarG
Enr
cyt b
cyt b
2e
–
[4Fe-4S]
MGD
3[4Fe-4S]
3Fe-4S
NO3
–
+ 2H+
NO2
–
+ H2O
DNA
UQH2
UQ

Another membrane-bound NRase was found in E.
coli (and in this organism only) [30]. It was shown by dena-
turing electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gel that NarZYV
consists of two subunits with molecular mass of 150 and
60 kD encoded by narZ and narY genes and contains Mo-
co. Subunit γ of NarZYV encoded by narV was lost during
purification, but its existence was proved by spectral meth-
ods. The [Fe-S] clusters of NarZYV resemble by their
characteristics NarGHI, except the potential of the α-sub-
unit high-potential centers. Both enzymes catalyze nitrate
and chlorate reduction and are inhibited by azide.
Despite common properties, NarGHI and NarZYV
are characterized by different electrophoretic mobility
(Rf = 0.23 and 0.38 for NarGHI and NarZYV, respective-
ly). NarZYV is present in E. coli cells in minimal amounts
independently of the oxygen partial pressure.
Nitrate reduction is known to be controlled by oxy-
gen at several levels: at the level of gene expression and at
the level of nitrogen oxo-anion transport. In E. coli, P.
fluorescens, and P. stutzeri the narGHJI operon expression
is induced by anaerobiosis and by the presence of nitrate
or nitrite [40-42]. The regulatory transcription factor Fnr
(regulator of fumarate- and NRases) isolated from E. coli
is an anaerobic activator of narGHJI and in structure is a
dimer containing [Fe-S] clusters. The protein is inacti-
vated by molecular oxygen as a result of disintegration of
[4Fe-4S] clusters and is converted to the monomer form.
The Fnr protein monomer can be divided into three func-
tional domains: N-terminal sensor region incorporating
the [4Fe-4S] cluster (residues 1-50), central allosteric
domain contacting RNA polymerase, and C-terminal
regulatory domain incorporating the H–T–H region
[43]. In P. aeruginosa and some other Pseudomonas
species the Anr protein (anaerobic regulation of anaero-
bic deiminase and NRase) was identified as a structural
and functional homolog of Fnr [44, 45]. This regulator is
necessary for denitrification cascade induction during
growth on nitrogen oxides [44-46].
Despite significant interest of researchers in the
mechanism of nitrate uptake by denitrifying bacteria, this
problem is still poorly studied. In a number of articles dif-
ferent mechanisms of nitrate penetration were proposed
such as passive uniport, ATP-dependent uniport, trans-
membrane potential-dependent NO3
–
/H+
symport, and
NO3
–
/NO2
–
antiport [47].
BACTERIAL DISSIMILATORY PERIPLASMIC
NITRATE REDUCTASE (Nap)
It is supposed that nitrate reduction in the periplasm
plays the key role in aerobic denitrification in
Pseudomonas sp. [48], Paracoccus pantotrophus [49, 50],
and Rb. sphaeroides f. sp. denitrificans [51, 52], in adapta-
tion to growth under anaerobic conditions in Ralstonia
eutropha [53], in the maintenance of the oxidation–
reduction equilibrium upon nitrate usage as electron
acceptor for reducing energy removal in Rb. capsulatus,
Rb. sphaeroides, and Thiosphaera pantotropha [54, 55], or
for doubling the nitrate trace amounts in the case of E. coli
growing on a nitrate-deficient medium [56-58]. The nap
genes were also identified in Ps. putida [59], Ps. aeruginosa
[60], Ps. stutzeri, Shewanella putrefaciens, H. influenzae,
and quite recently in some pathogenic bacteria like
Salmonella typhimurium, Vibrio cholerae, Yersinia pestis,
and Campylobacter jejuni. Evidently, as soon as new infor-
mation concerning genomes of still not studied bacteria
will become available, we can expect a significant increase
in the number of species incorporating nap genes.
NRases localized in the periplasm are heterodimers
consisting of a catalytic 90-kD subunit, incorporating
molybdenum cofactor and one [4Fe-4S] center, and of a
13-19-kD subunit incorporating two-heme cytochrome c
[61-63] (Fig. 7). They are not involved in formation of
transmembrane potential.
Periplasmic NRase (NapABC enzyme) is encoded
by the napFDAGHBC operon, in which napA is responsi-
ble for synthesis of the catalytic subunit, and napB is the
two-heme cytochrome c involved in electron transport
onto molybdopterin [64]. Both subunits are synthesized
Fig. 7. Organization of genes encoding proteins of periplasmic
bacterial nitrate reductase.
Escherichia coli
2H+
E D A B C F D A G H B C
periplasm
NapA
NO3
–
+ 2H+
NO2
–
+ H2O
Paracoccus denitrificans
Rhodobacter sphaeroides Shewanella putrefaciens
K E F D A B C D A G H B
NapB
NapC NapG
NapE
NapK
2H+
NapH
NapF
NapD
p
G
X
X
C
C
X
X
G
p
MGD
[4Fe-4S]
2 x cytc
4x[4Fe-4S]
2e
_
4 x cytc
QH2
Q
4x[4Fe-4S]
2x[4Fe-4S]
QH2
Q?
cytoplasm

as a precursor with N-terminal signal sequence that
defines their transfer through cytoplasmic membrane into
the periplasmic space. The NapC, membrane-bound
tetra-heme protein of cytochrome c-type, belongs to the
NapC/NirT family of periplasmic multi-heme proteins of
cytochrome c-type, which provide for the main,
cytochrome bc1-independent pathway of electron transfer
between quinone of cytoplasmic membrane and water-
soluble periplasmic oxidoreductases. The NapC/NirT
protein, a homolog of NrfH protein, which transfers elec-
trons between quinone and cytochrome c-nitrite reduc-
tase, was identified in Wolinella succinogenes [65]. The
cytoplasmic protein NapD is important for NapA matu-
ration [57]. Five different nap genes in different combina-
tions with napDABC were detected in well-studied nap
operons. They include napF, napG, and napH encoding
the [Fe-S] oxidation–reduction proteins, napE encoding
an integral membrane protein whose function is
unknown, and napK found only in Rb. sphaeroides [51].
Bacterial periplasmic NRase exhibits various physio-
logical functions and is expressed under different condi-
tions, although usually the NRase activity is revealed
under aerobic conditions, and the enzyme synthesis is not
repressed by ammonium [66, 67]. In E. coli maximal
expression of NRase is observed at low nitrate concentra-
tions under anaerobic conditions, in this case both Fnr
and NarP proteins are required [68-70]. On the other
hand, the Nap system of Ralstonia eutropha is maximally
expressed under aerobic conditions in the stationary
growth stage and is not induced by nitrate [53]. In P. pan-
totrophus maximal nap expression was found in cells
grown under aerobic conditions on such reduced carbon
sources as butyrate or caproate, but no expression was
detected in the case of growth on more oxidized sub-
strates like succinate or malate [71]. In the bacterium R.
sphaeroides DSM158 the Nap activity was stimulated, the
enzyme synthesis took place both under aerobic and
anaerobic conditions, but in the latter case it was more
efficient [52, 68].
The periplasmic localization of the enzyme raises
important questions concerning NRase transport. The
cytochrome c-containing enzyme subunit (NapB) incor-
porates a typical N-terminal signal sequence that is nec-
essary for Sec (secretion)-dependent transport [72, 73].
However, the catalytic NapA subunit can be assembled in
the cytoplasm and exported into the periplasm in a fold-
ed conformation via a Sec-independent pathway [72]. It
is supposed [73-75] that alternative transport systems may
involve unusually long and containing double arginine
site N-terminal signal sequences of NapA (and other
periplasmic molybdoenzymes), like it was supposed for
the pdf (proton driving force)-dependent pathways of
thylakoid import. The MGD cofactor is known to be syn-
thesized in the cytoplasm with involvement of five differ-
ent loci (moa, mob, mod, moe, and mog), but there are still
no data concerning the cofactor export in bacteria.
Besides, the size of cofactor and its complete internal
environment in the protein [7] suggest that the MGD
cofactor may be assembled in the cytoplasm before its
transport. It has been shown that the cofactor incorpora-
tion into apoprotein is a prerequisite for the trimethyl-
amine-N-oxidoreductase transfer in E. coli via Sec-inde-
pendent pathways [76]. Recently genes have been identi-
fied in E. coli that are necessary for Sec-independent
export of periplasmic protein that contains the MGD
cofactor [77, 78].
ASSIMILATORY EUKARYOTIC NITRATE
REDUCTASE (Euk-NRase)
The assimilatory NAD(P)H:nitrate reductase belongs
to the NRase family of the class of molybdenum-contain-
ing enzymes, which are widespread in plants, fungi, yeasts,
and algae [2, 79-81]. It is a water-soluble enzyme consist-
ing of a polypeptide with molecular mass of approximate-
ly 100 kD, bound to the molybdenum-molybdopterin
molecule (Mo-MPT), heme iron, and FAD. It is known
that dimerization of the enzyme is necessary for its activi-
ty, and thus the native enzyme is a homodimer having a
tendency to further dimerization to a homotetramer
(dimer of dimer). The enzyme has two active centers car-
rying out the internal electron transfer from FAD onto the
heme iron and then to Mo-MPT. On the first active center
electrons are transferred from FAD via NADH (or
NADPH) onto the enzyme; in the second active center
two electrons are transferred from reduced Mo(IV) to
nitrate and reduce the latter to nitrite and hydroxide.
Eukaryotic NRase exhibits its activity with such electron
acceptors as ferricyanide and cytochrome c by obtaining
electrons directly from FAD and heme iron, respectively.
The enzyme has only a limited similarity to prokaryotic
NRase that also contains Mo and pterin cofactor.
Bacterial cofactor (MGD) differs from eukaryotic MPT
by an additional nucleotide. In bacteria, the Mo atom
coordinates two pterins. All bacterial NRases contain the
[4Fe-4S] oxidation–reduction centers as electron carriers
from the electron donor to the enzyme. However, there is
still no known eukaryotic NRase that contains [Fe-S] cen-
ters as components of the electron transfer chain.
Studying genes encoding NRase of the yeast methy-
lotroph Hansenula polymorpha has shown that they are
located in the same locus with genes Yna1 and Yna2
responsible for transcription [82]. A similar gene structure
was also observed in different organisms, such as the fun-
gus Aspergillus [83, 84] or algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
[85, 86], but not in the fungus Neurospora crassa [87].
Despite the fact that many aspects of nitrate trans-
port (NT) in eukaryotes are still not clear, it is assumed
that a nitrate carrier really exists. Nitrate transport is car-
ried out in symport with protons, the driving force of
which is the transmembrane potential generated at the

expense of ATP hydrolysis by H+
-ATPase [88]. Individual
components of the NT system are regulated in a complex
way including induction by nitrate and repression follow-
ing a feedback mechanism (regulation by nitrate reduc-
tion products) [89, 90].
On the basis of expression condition and affinity to
nitrate all carriers can be classified as constitutive or
inducible with a high or low affinity to the substrate.
Studying primary amino acid sequence of nitrate carriers
NRT1 and NRT2 in algae and fungi has shown that they
belong to the superfamily of peptide transporters (MFS,
Major Facilitator Superfamily) [91]. NRT1 belongs to the
subgroup of nitrate/nitrite transporters, but effectively
transporting nitrate, histidine, and nitrite [92], whereas
NRT2 belongs to the subgroup of proton-dependent
oligopeptide transporters, transporting peptides, amino
acids, nitrate, chlorate, and nitrite [88].
Recently it has been found that eukaryotic cells are
able to carry out denitrification [93]. In particular, some
species of yeasts and fungi are able to perform the dissim-
ilatory reduction of nitrate to N2O [94-96]. The fungus
Cylindrocarpon tonkinense is able to denitrify NO3
–
despite
the presence of ammonium ions in the medium, the pres-
ence of sugars being the key condition for switching on
denitrification. In this case there is significantly increased
level of enzymes involved in NO3
–
metabolism such as
assimilatory NADPH- (or NADH)-dependent NO3
–
reductase, dissimilatory nitrite reductase, and NO reduc-
tase, but not ubiquinone-dependent dissimilatory NRase
[96]. Thus, the existence in C. tonkinense of a new type of
denitrification was shown, including assimilatory NRase
at the first step.
Zhou et al. have shown that the fungus Fusarium
oxysporum MT-811 was able to reduce nitrate to ammo-
nium under anaerobic conditions [97]. This process was
able to maintain growth of the fungus even under com-
pletely anaerobic conditions [97]. Cells grown under
microaerophilic conditions contained a noticeable num-
ber of intact mitochondria [98], which agrees well with
data on mitochondrial localization of the dissimilatory
denitrification process [99]. It was assumed previously
that soil fungi were obligate aerobes, but new data allow
one to consider them as facultative aerobes (or facultative
anaerobes).
Kurakov et al. have shown that dissimilatory NRase
is synthesized de novo under anaerobic conditions in the
fungus F. oxysporum 11dn1. The enzyme significantly dif-
fers by its properties (specific activity, molecular mass,
temperature optimum) from assimilatory enzyme [100].
Japanese scientists have identified a relationship
between activity of NRase found in mitochondrial frac-
tion of the fungus F. oxysporum MT-811 and ATP synthe-
sis and also solubilized and partially purified the enzyme
[99, 101]. Intact mitochondria of F. oxysporum exhibited
NRase activity with physiological respiratory substrates
(malate + pyruvate, succinate, formate) and with syn-
thetic electron donors (reduced methyl viologen, MVH).
Detergent treatment of mitochondrial fraction resulted in
a loss of NRase activity in the presence of respiratory sub-
strates, but had no effect on the MVH-dependent enzyme
activity. These results confirm the supposition concerning
the NRase relationship with the respiratory chain.
Besides, fungal NRase exhibited similarity by spectral
characteristics, molecular mass, and cofactor to dissimi-
latory NRase of E. coli and other denitrifying bacteria
containing molybdopterin, cytochrome b, and Fe-S pro-
teins.
ALTERATIONS OF NITRATE REDUCTASE
PROPERTIES AND STRUCTURE
CAUSED BY STRESS FACTORS
At this stage of investigations properties and struc-
ture of NRases of organisms (microorganisms, plants)
grown under stress conditions are still poorly studied.
Nevertheless, this information is extremely important
both for revealing general mechanisms of adaptation to
stress and for applied investigations with due regard to the
role of NRase in nitrogen turnover in nature.
It is known that many hyperthermophilic
(Pyrobaculum aerophilum [102], Halobacterium denitrifi-
cans [103]) and thermophilic (Thermus thermophilus
[104], Caldithrix abyssi [105], Thermovibrio ammonificans
[106]) bacteria are able to utilize nitrate as electron
acceptor under anaerobic conditions. The process of the
extremophile denitrification is studied insufficiently, but
NRase of some archaebacteria (P. aerophilum [107],
Haloarcula marismortui [108]) and certain Haloferax
species [109] has been studied.
Nitrate reductase of P. aerophilum is structurally
similar to the enzyme of Haloferax volcanii consisting of
three subunits of 100, 60, and 31 kD [110] and is a mem-
brane-bound enzyme, whereas NRases of Haloferax de-
nitrificans, Haloferax mediterranei, and Haloarcula maris-
mortui are localized in the periplasm [108, 109]. There
may be an additional protein that binds NRase to the
cytoplasmic membrane, NRase of H. marismortui, evi-
dently, differs from the rest enzymes because it is a
homotetramer consisting of 63 kD subunits. All NRases
of halophilic archaebacteria, except H. denitrificans,
require an increased salt concentration for revealing
activity and structural stabilization, but the increase in
salt concentration resulted in a shift of temperature opti-
mum of the H. mediterranei enzyme activity towards
higher temperatures.
Nitrate reductase of hyperthermophilic archaebac-
terium P. aerophilum was isolated from cells grown under
anaerobic conditions in the presence of nitrate and low
amounts of tungsten and molybdenum. The isolated
enzyme has been characterized [107, 110]. The enzyme
contained molybdenum (0.8 mol/mol protein) in its

active center and was structurally similar to NRases of
mesophilic organisms [30], but differed from them by
unusually high specific activity (326 U/mg), measured at
75°C with benzyl viologen as an electron donor; the activ-
ity measured at 95°C was even higher (526 U/mg). Like
other dissimilatory NRases of mesophilic organisms, the
enzyme of P. aerophilum was also able to utilize chlorate
as a substrate at a rate exceeding that of nitrate utilization.
The NRase affinity to nitrate and chlorate 4-60 times
higher than this is described for dissimilatory NRases of
mesophilic organisms for which the Km value is 2-3 mM
[30].
It should be noted that anaerobic growth of this bac-
terium on the nitrate-containing medium required the
presence of 0.7-1.5 µM tungstate, which could not be
replaced by molybdate [107]. In most prokaryotes and
eukaryotes, tungsten is an antagonist of molybdenum and
easily replaces the latter within inactive analogs of molyb-
denum-containing enzymes [111]. Owing to this, tung-
sten is often used as a tool for studying structure and prop-
erties of molybdenum enzymes [112]. The addition of
100 µM molybdate to culture medium completely inhib-
ited bacterial growth. At low tungstate concentrations (0.3
µM and lower) nitrite accumulation in the growth medi-
um was observed, which was prevented by tungsten addi-
tion in higher concentrations. The dependence of P.
aerophilum growth on tungsten suggests the incorporation
of tungsten-containing enzymes into metabolic pathways,
but the key enzyme of nitrate dissimilation NRase con-
tained molybdenum in its active center [110].
A similar tungsten effect was also observed in the
salt-tolerant yeast Rhodotorula glutinis on a medium con-
taining molybdenum and tungsten in equimolecular
amounts (1 mM). Tungsten stimulated Mo-co synthesis
and following increase in NRase activity, but tungsten was
not found in NRase; its activity was revealed only at the
level of Mo-co expression [113, 114].
During the past decades a number of tungsten-con-
taining enzymes have been isolated from cells of ther-
mophilic archaebacteria. Among them there are formate
dehydrogenase, aldehyde:ferredoxin oxidoreductase,
formaldehyde:ferredoxin oxidoreductase, etc. containing
tungsten in their active center and not able to replace it
with molybdenum. At the same time a number of
enzymes were found whose catalytic activity can be
exhibited both with molybdenum and tungsten (formyl
methanofuran dehydrogenase, trimethylamine-N-oxide
reductase, etc.). Molybdopterin, able to coordinate both
molybdenum and tungsten, is the active center of these
enzymes [112].
Very recently two NRases, free of molybdenum and
molybdenum cofactor, have been isolated from the cells
of vanadate-reducing bacterium Pseudomonas isachen-
hovii growing under high content of vanadium
(0.5 g/liter) [115]. The periplasmic NRase was a 55-kD
monomer, containing vanadium, whereas the membrane-
bound NRase was a heterodimer of 130 and 67 kD sub-
units and no metal was found in the active center [115].
The reductase complex isolated from the dissimila-
tory iron-reducing bacterium Geobacter metallireducens
did not contain molybdenum and molybdenum cofactor
in the active center, but contained cytochrome c and was
able to reduce both nitrate and nitrite [116].
In our laboratory a highly active NRase of 130-
140 kD was isolated from cells of a halophilic denitrifying
bacterium of the Halomonas genus, strain AGJ 1-3. The
enzyme was purified to homogeneity, and it contained no
molybdenum or molybdo-cofactor in the active center
[117]. The enzyme was characterized by thermal stability
and relative insensitivity to NaCl in high concentrations,
had temperature optimum at 70-80°C, and exhibited
polyreductase activity by reducing nitrates and other oxo-
anions.
The above-mentioned data from the literature allow
us to conclude unambiguously that stress factors in cul-
ture medium have a substantial effect on structural and
functional characteristics of NRases. Attempts to system-
atize leading mechanisms of the pro- and eukaryotic
organisms’ “responses” to the environmental stress con-
ditions were not successful, probably due to not enough
experimental data. However, analysis of data from the lit-
erature indicates that, as a rule, alterations take place at
the structural level of the active center, which results in a
shift of the enzyme activity optimum to the region of
higher temperatures, an increase in thermal stability, and
changes in substrate specificity towards polyfunctionality;
changes also happen at the level of synthesis of specific
molecules that prevent or decrease the effect of stress fac-
tors on the enzyme.
REFERENCES
1. Campbell, W. H. (1999) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant
Mol. Biol., 50, 277-303.
2. Campbell, W. H. (2001) Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 58, 194-204.
3. Moreno-Vivian, C., Cabello, P., Martinez-Luque, M.,
Blasco, R., and Castillo, F. (1999) J. Bacteriol., 181, 6573-
6584.
4. Richardson, D. J. (2000) Microbiology, 146, 551-571.
5. Richardson, D. J., Berks, B. C., Russell, D. A., Spiro, S.,
and Taylor, C. J. (2001) Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 58, 165-178.
6. Stolz, J. F., and Basu, P. (2002) ChemBioChem., 3, 198-206.
7. Dias, J. M., Than, M. E., Humm, A., Huber, R.,
Bourenkov, G. P., Bartunik, H. D., Bursakov, S., Calvete,
J., Caldeira, J., Carneiro, C., Moura, J. J. G., Moura, I.,
and Romao, M. J. (1999) Structure Fold Des., 7, 65-79.
8. Boyington, J. C., Gladyshev, V. N., Khangulov, S. V.,
Stadtman, T. C., and Sun, P. D. (1997) Science, 275, 1305-
1308.
9. Czjzek, M., Dos Santos, J. P., Pommier, J., Giordano, G.,
Mejean, V., and Haser, R. (1998) J. Mol. Biol., 284, 435-447.
10. McAlpine, A. S., McEwan, A. G., and Bailey, S. (1998) J.
Mol. Biol., 275, 613-623.

11. Butler, C. S., Charnock, J. M., Bennett, B., Sears, H. J.,
Reilly, A. J., Ferguson, S. J., Garner, C. D., Lowe, D. J.,
Thomson, A. J., Berks, B. C., and Richardson, D. J. (1999)
Biochemistry, 38, 9000-9012.
12. Rubio, L. M., Flores, E., and Herrero, A. (1999) FEBS
Lett., 462, 358-362.
13. Rubio, L. M., Flores, E., and Herrero, A. (2002)
Photosynth. Res., 72, 13-26.
14. Mikami, B., and Ida, S. (1984) Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 791,
294-304.
15. Blasco, R., Castillo, F., and Martinez-Luque, M. (1997)
FEBS Lett., 414, 45-49.
16. Lin, J. T., and Stewart, V. (1998) Adv. Microb. Physiol., 38,
1-30.
17. Ogawa, K. I., Akagawa, E., Yamane, K., Sun, Z. W.,
LaCelle, M., Zuber, P., and Nakano, M. M. (1995) J.
Bacteriol., 177, 1409-1413.
18. Lin, J. T., and Stewart, V. (1996) J. Mol. Biol., 256, 423-
435.
19. Wu, Q., and Stewart, V. (1998) J. Bacteriol., 180, 1311-
1322.
20. Ramos, F., Blanco, G., Gutierrez, J. C., Luque, F., and
Tortolero, M. (1993) Mol. Microbiol., 8, 1145-1153.
21. Frias, J. E., Flores, E., and Herrero, A. (1997) J. Bacteriol.,
179, 477-486.
22. Omata, T. (1995) Plant Cell Physiol., 36, 207-213.
23. Moir, J. W., and Wood, N. J. (2001) Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 58,
215-224.
24. Deckert, G., Warren, P. V., Gaasterland, T., Young, W. G.,
Lenox, A. L., Graham, D. E., et al. (1998) Nature, 392,
353-358.
25. Kerschen, E. J., Irani, V. R., Hassett, D. J., and Rowe, J. J.
(2001) J. Bacteriol., 183, 2125-2131.
26. Wu, S. Q., Chai, W., Lin, J. T., and Stewart, V. (1999) J.
Bacteriol., 181, 7274-7284.
27. Castillo, F., Dobao, M. M., Reyes, F., Blasco, R., Roldan,
M. D., Gavira, M., Caballero, F. J., Moreno-Vivian, C.,
and Martinez-Luque, M. (1996) Curr. Microbiol., 33, 341-
346.
28. Herrero, A., Muro-Pastor, A. M., and Flores, E. (2001) J.
Bacteriol., 183, 411-425.
29. Maeda, S., and Omata, T. (2004) J. Bacteriol., 186, 2107-
2114.
30. Zumft, W. G. (1997) Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 61, 533-
616.
31. Berks, B. C., Ferguson, S. J., Moir, J. W., and Richardson,
D. J. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1232, 97-173.
32. Philippot, L., and Hojberg, O. (1999) Biochim. Biophys.
Acta, 1446, 1-23.
33. Magalon, A., Rothery, R. A., Giordano, G., Blasco, F., and
Weiner, J. H. (1997) J. Bacteriol., 179, 5037-5045.
34. Jormakka, M., Byrne, B., and Iwata, S. (2003) FEBS Lett.,
545, 25-30.
35. Jepson, B. J., Anderson, L. J., Rubio, L. M., Taylor, C. J.,
Butler, C. S., Flores, E., Herrero, A., Butt, J. N., and
Richardson, D. J. (2004) J. Biol. Chem., 279, 32212-32218.
36. Gregory, L. G., Bond, P. L., Richardson, D. J., and Spiro,
S. (2003) Microbiology, 149, 229-237.
37. Schindelin, H., Kisker, C., Hilton, J., Rajagopalan, K. V.,
and Rees, D. C. (1996) Science, 14, 1615-1621.
38. Hille, R., Retey, J., Bartlewski-Hof, V., Reichenbechen, W.,
and Schink, B. (1999) FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 22, 489-501.
39. Henikoff, S., and Henikoff, J. G. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res.,
19, 6565-6572.
40. Khoroshilova, N., Popescu, C., Munck, E., Beinert, H.,
and Kiley, P. J. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 6087-
6092.
41. Hartig, E., Schiek, U., Vollack, K. U., and Zumft, W. G.
(1999) J. Bacteriol., 181, 3658-3665.
42. Philippot, L., Mirleau, P., Mazurier, S., Siblot, S.,
Hartmann, A., Lemanceau, P., and Germon, J. C. (2001)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1517, 436-440.
43. Bates, D. M., Lazazzera, B. A., and Kiley, P. J. (1995) J.
Bacteriol., 177, 3972-3978.
44. Galimand, M., Gamper, M., Zimmermann, A., and Haas,
D. (1991) J. Bacteriol., 173, 1598-1606.
45. Sawers, R. G. (1991) Mol. Microbiol., 5, 1469-1481.
46. Ye, R. W., Haas, D., Ka, J. O., Krishnapillai, V.,
Zimmermann, A., Baird, C., and Tiedje, J. M. (1995) J.
Bacteriol., 177, 3606-3609.
47. Berks, B. C., Page, M. D., Richardson, D. J., Reilly, A.,
Cavill, A., Outen, F., and Ferguson, S. J. (1995) Mol.
Microbiol., 15, 319-331.
48. Bedzyk, L., Wang, T., and Ye, R. W. (1999) J. Bacteriol.,
181, 2802-2806.
49. Butler, C. S., Charnock, J. M., Bennett, B., Sears, H. J.,
Reilly, A. J., Ferguson, S. J., Garner, C. D., Lowe, D. J.,
Thomson, A. J., Berks, B. C., and Richardson, D. J. (1999)
Biochemistry, 38, 9000-9012.
50. Ellington, M. J. K., Sawers, G., Sears, H. J., Spiro, S.,
Richardson, D. J., and Ferguson, S. J. (2003) Microbiology,
149, 1533-1540.
51. Reyes, F., Gavira, M., Castillo, F., and Moreno-Vivian, C.
(1998) Biochem. J., 331, 897-904.
52. Gavira, M., Roldan, M. D., Castillo, F., Moreno-Vivian,
C. (2002) J. Bacteriol., 184, 1693-1702.
53. Siddiqui, R. A., Warnecke-Eberz, U., Hengsberger, A.,
Schneider, B., and Friedrich, B. (1993) J. Bacteriol., 175,
5867-5876.
54. Bell, L. C., Richardson, D. J., and Ferguson, S. J. (1990)
FEBS Lett., 265, 85-87.
55. Dobao, M. M., Martinez-Luque, M., Moreno-Vivian, C.,
and Castillo, F. (1994) Can. J. Microbiol., 40, 645-650.
56. Brondijk, T. H. C., Fiegen, D., Richardson, D. J., and
Cole, J. A. (2002) Mol. Microbiol., 44, 245-255.
57. Potter, L. C., Millington, P. D., Thomas, G. H., Rothery,
R. A., Giordano, G., and Cole, J. (2000) FEMS Microbiol.
Lett., 185, 51-57.
58. Potter, L., Angove, H., Richardson, D., and Cole, J. A.
(2001) Adv. Microb. Physiol., 45, 51-112.
59. Carter, J. P., Richardson, D. J., and Spiro, S. (1995) Arch.
Microbiol., 163, 159-166.
60. Vollack, K., Xie, J., Hartig, E., Romling, U., and Zumft,
W. G. (1998) Microbiology, 144, 441-448.
61. Berks, B. C., Richardson, D. J., Reilly, A., Willis, A. C.,
and Ferguson, S. J. (1995) Biochem. J., 309, 983-992.
62. Philippot, L., Clays-Josserand, A., Lensi, R., Trinsoutrot,
I., Normand, P., and Potier, P. (1997) Biochim. Biophys.
Acta, 1350, 272-276.
63. Stewart, V., Lu, Y., and Darwin, A. J. (2002) J. Bacteriol.,
184, 1314-1323.
64. Flanagan, D. A., Gregory, L. G., Carter, J. P., Karakas-
Sen, A., Richardson, D. J., and Spiro, S. (1999) FEMS
Microbiol. Lett., 177, 263-270.

65. Simon, J., Gross, R., Einsle, O., Kroneck, P. M. H.,
Kroger, A., and Klimmek, O. (2000) Mol. Microbiol., 35,
686-696.
66. Kiley, P. J., and Beinert, H. (1998) FEMS Microbiol. Rev.,
22, 341-352.
67. Philippot, L. (2002) Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1577, 355-376.
68. Darwin, A. J., Ziegelhoffer, E. C., Kiley, P. J., and Stewart,
V. (1998) J. Bacteriol., 180, 4192-4198.
69. Stewart, V., Bledsoe, P. J., and Williams, S. B. (2003) J.
Bacteriol., 185, 5862-5870.
70. Wang, H., Tseng, C.-P., and Gunsalus, R. P. (1999) J.
Bacteriol., 181, 5303-5308.
71. Sears, H. J., Sawers, G., Reilly, A., Berks, B. C., Ferguson,
S. J., and Richardson, D. J. (2000) Microbiology, 146,
2977-2985.
72. Eser, M., and Ehrmann, M. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA, 100, 13231-13234.
73. Fekkes, P. A., and Driessen, J. M. (1999) Microbiol. Mol.
Biol. Rev., 63, 161-173.
74. Dilks, K., Rose, R. W., Hartmann, E., and Pohlschroder,
M. (2003) J. Bacteriol., 185, 1478-1483.
75. Berks, B. C., Sargent, F., and Palmer, T. (2000) Mol.
Microbiol., 35, 260-274.
76. Santini, C. L., Ize, B., Chanal, A., Muller, M., Giordano,
G., and Wu, L. F. (1998) EMBO J., 17, 101-112.
77. Sargent, F., Bogsch, E. G., Stanley, N., Wexler, M.,
Robinson, C., Berks, B. C., and Palmer, T. (1998) EMBO
J., 17, 3640-3650.
78. Weiner, J. H., Bilous, P. T., Shaw, G. M., Lubitz, S. P.,
Frost, L., Thomas, G. H., Cole, J. A., and Turner, R. J.
(1998) Cell, 93, 93-101.
79. Inokuchi, R., Kuma, K., Miyata, T., and Okada, M. (2002)
Physiol. Plant., 116, 1-11.
80. Joseph-Horne, T., Hollomon, D. W., and Wood, P. M.
(2001) Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1504, 179-195.
81. Siverio, J. M. (2002) FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 26, 277-284.
82. Avila, J., Gonzalez, C., Brito, N., Machin, F., Perez, M.
D., and Siverio, J. M. (2002) Yeast, 19, 537-544.
83. Amaar, Y. G., and Moore, M. M. (1998) Curr. Genet., 33,
206-215.
84. Hall, N., and Tomsett, A. B. (2000) Microbiology, 146,
1399-1406.
85. Llamas, A., Igeno, M., Galvan, A., and Fernandez, E.
(2002) Plant J., 30, 261-271.
86. Zhou, J.-J., Fernandez, E., Galvan, A., and Miller, A. J.
(2000) FEBS Lett., 466, 225-227.
87. Okamoto, P. M., and Marzluf, G. A. (1993) Mol. Gen.
Genet., 240, 221-230.
88. Galvan, A., and Fernandez, E. (2001) CMLS, Cell. Mol.
Life Sci., 58, 225-233.
89. Daniel-Vedele, F., Filleur, S., and Caboche, M. (1998)
Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 1, 235-239.
90. Forde, B. (2000) Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1465, 219-235.
91. Crawford, N. M., and Glass, A. M. D. (1998) Trends Plant
Sci., 3, 389-395.
92. Pao, S. S., Paulsen, I. T., and Saier, M. H. (1998) Microbiol.
Mol. Biol. Rev., 62, 1-34.
93. Takaya, N. (2002) J. Biosci. Bioeng., 94, 506-510.
94. Shoun, H., Kim, D.-H., Uchiyama, H., and Sugiyama, J.
(1992) FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 94, 277-282.
95. Tsuruta, S., Takaya, N., Zhang, L., Shoun, H., Kimura,
K., Hamamoto, M., and Nakase, T. (1998) FEMS
Microbiol. Lett., 168, 105-110.
96. Watsuji, T., Takaya, N., Nakamura, A., and Shoun, H.
(2003) Biosci. Biotech. Biochem., 67, 1115-1120.
97. Zhou, Z., Takaya, N., Nakamura, A., Yamaguchi, M.,
Takeo, K., and Shoun, H. (2002) J. Biol. Chem., 277,
1892-1896.
98. Takaya, N., Kuwazaki, S., Adachi, Y., Suzuki, S., Kikuchi,
T., Nakamura, H., Shiro, Y., and Shoun, H. (2003) J.
Biochem., 133, 461-465.
99. Kobayashi, M., Matsuo, Y., Takimoto, A., Suzuki, S.,
Maruo, F., and Shoun, H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem., 271,
16263-16267.
100. Kurakov, A. V., Nosikov, A. N., Skrynnikova, E. V., and
L’vov, N. P. (2000) Curr. Microbiol., 41, 114-119.
101. Uchimura, H., Enjoji, H., Seki, T., Taguchi, A., Takaya,
N., and Shoun, H. (2002) J. Biochem., 131, 579-586.
102. Volkl, P., Huber, R., Drobner, E., Rachel, R., Burggraf, S.,
Trincone, A., et al. (1993) Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 59,
2918-2926.
103. Tomlinson, G. A., Jahnke, L. L., and Hochstein, L. I.
(1986) Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 36, 66-70.
104. Ramirez-Arcos, S., Fernandez-Herrero, L. A., and
Berenguer, J. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1396, 215-
227.
105. Miroshnichenko, M. L., Kostrikina, N. A., Chernyh, N.
A., Pimenov, N. V., Tourova, T. P., Antipov, A. N., Spring,
S., Stackebrandt, E., and Bonch-Osmolovskaya, E. A.
(2003) Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 53, 323-329.
106. Vetriani, C., Speck, M. D., Ellor, S. V., Lutz, R. A., and
Starovoytov, V. (2004) Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 54,
175-181.
107. Afshar, S., Kim, C., Monbouquette, H. G., and Schroder,
I. (1998) Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 64, 3004-3008.
108. Yoshimatsu, K., Sakurai, T., and Fujiwara, T. (2000) FEBS
Lett., 470, 216-220.
109. Hochstein, L. I., and Lang, F. (1991) Arch. Biochem.
Biophys., 288, 380-385.
110. Afshar, S., Johnson, E., de Vries, S., and Schroder, I.
(2000) J. Bacteriol., 183, 5491-5495.
111. Hille, R. (2002) Trends Biochem. Sci., 27, 360-367.
112. L’vov, N. P., Nosikov, A. N., and Antipov, A. N. (2002)
Biochemistry (Moscow), 67, 196-200.
113. Morozkina, E. V., Nosikov, A. N., Zvyagilskaya, R. A., and
L’vov, N. P. (2005) Biochemistry (Moscow), 70, 809-814.
114. Nosikov, A. N., Chichikalo, E. V., Golubeva, L. I.,
Zvyagilskaya, R. A., and L’vov, N. P. (2000) Biochemistry
(Moscow), 65, 204-207.
115. Antipov, A. N., Lyalikova, N. N., Khijniak, T. V., and
L’vov, N. P. (1998) FEBS Lett., 441, 257-260.
116. Murillo, M. F., Gugliuzza, T., Senko, J., Basu, P., and
Stolz, J. F. (1999) Arch. Microbiol., 172, 313-320.
117. Antipov, A. N., Morozkina, E. V., Sorokin, D. Yu.,
Golubeva, L. B., Zvyagilskaya, R. A., and L’vov, N. P.
(2005) Biochemistry (Moscow), 70, 799-803.

Nitrate Reductases: Structure, Functions, and Effect of Stress Factors

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Nitrate Reductases: Structure, Functions, and Effect of Stress Factors (20)

More from IPN (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Nitrate Reductases: Structure, Functions, and Effect of Stress Factors