SlideShare a Scribd company logo
7
Most read
11
Most read
13
Most read
Norm-Referenced
Grading System
Tadeo A. Rosalia
My task;
• Difficulties in Grading
• Discuss what is norm-ref.
• Norm-Referenced Grading System
– Refers to a grading system where in a student
performance is evaluated relatively to the performance of
the other student.
– Using the norm-ref. grading system, a student performance
is evaluated relatively to the performance of other student
within the group.
– Also known as grading curve the teacher will be the one to
set how many percent of the student in the class assign
each grade if it is not stated in the grading policy.
Some example:
1. Percentile rank, Formula:
L-percentile, M-Score, N-no. of Observation.
2. Standard nine (stanine) are some example of
norm-reference grading system.
3. Mean
Formula:
Norm-Referenced Grading System
• Example
– 10 student in different class with different scores. section A and B.
– Midterm scores 100 items, same test paper.
• Class A= ( 30,40,50,55,60,65,70,75,80,85)
• Mean=61
• Class B=( 55,60,65,70,75,80,85,90,90,95,)
• Mean=76
• Student in “A” class .Raw Score 75 Percentile score 80%
• Student in “B” class .Raw Score 80 Percentile score 80%
Norm-Referenced Grading System
HOW TO GET THE MEAN?
• Class A= ( 30,40,50,55,60,65,70,75,80,85)
• Class B=( 55,60,65,70,75,80,85,90,90,95,)
• CLASS “A”
• = Or
• Sol.=
Mean= 61
• Class A= ( 30,40,50,55,60,65,70,75,80,85)
• Class B=( 55,60,65,70,75,80,85,90,90,95,)
• CLASS “B”
or
Sol.
=
mean= 76
HOW TO GET THE MEAN?
• Class A= ( 30,40,50,55,60,65,70,75,80,85)
• Class B=(55,60,65,70,75,80,85,90,90,95,)
• Student in “A” class .Raw Score 75 Percentile score 80%
= =7.5 or 8 observation “A”
• 80% observation is less than 75
and 20% is greater than 85.
• Student in “B” class .Raw Score 90 Percentile score 80%
=8.5 observation “B”
-80% observation is less than
90and 20% is greater than 90.
• Student in “A” class .Raw Score 75 Percentile score 80%
= 7.5 or 8 observation “A”
• Student in “B” class .Raw Score 90 Percentile score 80%
= 8.5 observation “B”
• The following examples shows some of the of the difficulty
associated with Norm-Reference Grading System.
• -Problem equivalency .
Class A= ( 30,40,50,55,60,65,70,75,80,85)
Class B=( 55,60,65,70,75,80,85,90,90,95,)
• Indeed if one of the test used in the two classes are the same,
it would be rather unfair.
• This problem called Problem of Equivalency.
• One of example here a valedictorian , one from some remote
area rural high school and second a valedictorian from a
popular universities in urban area.
-Does one expect the same level of competence for these two
valedictorian?
Rural school Urban school
Level of Competence
Norm-Reference Grading System
If Mr. Ryan score is 75?
• Class A= ( 30,40,50,55,60,65,70,75,80,85)
• Mean=61
• Percentile score 80%
• Pass or Fail ?
Example..
Stanine Diagram
Mean 61
Raw Score= 75
Stanine 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Raw score 30 40 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
Poor BLW AV. Average above Average
failure failure pass pass
Class A= ( 30,40,50,55,60,65,70,75,80,85)
Norm-Referenced Grading System
Grading equivalent Raw score
Above average 75-85
Average (fair) 61-84
Below average (failure) 50-60
Poor (failure) 30-49
Raw score (Class A)
1-100 item exam
-If Mr. Ryan score is 75?
Percentile Rank,
• Formula
• L -percentile,
• M -Score,
• N -no. of Observation.
• Sol. =
=7.5 or 8
= 80% observation is less than 75 and 20% is
greater than 85.
Class “A”
( 30,40,50,55,60,65,70,75,80,85)
Norm-Referenced Grading System
• Dasd
• Other example…
Advantage
1. It is very easy to use.
2. It works well for the course with
retention policies and it limits
only few students to advance to
the next level.
3. It useful if the focus of the
individual achievement of the
student
4. It is appropriate to the large
number of student.
5. It does not encourage cooperate
among the student.
Norm-Referenced Grading System
Disadvantage
1. The performance of the
student is not determined
by his achievement, but
also the achievement of the
other students.
2. It promote competition
among the students rather
than cooperation.
3. It cannot be used when the
class size is smaller than
40.
4. Not all students can pass
the given subject or cours.
Norm referenced grading system

More Related Content

PPTX
Norm or criterion referenced grading
PPT
Reported speech
PPTX
Classical Conditioning by Ivan Pavlov.
DOCX
Affidavit of loss
PPTX
Articles
PPTX
Classical Test Theory (CTT)- By Dr. Jai Singh
PPTX
Basic Concept in Assessment
PPTX
Roles of Assessment in Making Classroom Instructional Decision
Norm or criterion referenced grading
Reported speech
Classical Conditioning by Ivan Pavlov.
Affidavit of loss
Articles
Classical Test Theory (CTT)- By Dr. Jai Singh
Basic Concept in Assessment
Roles of Assessment in Making Classroom Instructional Decision

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Norm referenced grading system
PPTX
Norm reference grading system.ppt
PPT
authentic vs. traditional assessment
PPTX
Assessment of learning 1
PPTX
Assessment of learning1
PPTX
Lesson 5 performance based assessment
PPT
Process oriented performance-based assessment
DOC
Kinds Of Learning Targets
PPTX
Affective assessment
PPTX
Item analysis
PDF
PDF
Item Analysis
PPTX
performance based -product oriented assessment
PPTX
Grading and reporting
PPTX
Types of test questions
PPT
10 axioms of curriculum change
PDF
Principles of high quality assessment
DOCX
Types of test
PPTX
Assessment
PPTX
The Nature of Performance-Based Assessment (Assessment of Learning 2)
Norm referenced grading system
Norm reference grading system.ppt
authentic vs. traditional assessment
Assessment of learning 1
Assessment of learning1
Lesson 5 performance based assessment
Process oriented performance-based assessment
Kinds Of Learning Targets
Affective assessment
Item analysis
Item Analysis
performance based -product oriented assessment
Grading and reporting
Types of test questions
10 axioms of curriculum change
Principles of high quality assessment
Types of test
Assessment
The Nature of Performance-Based Assessment (Assessment of Learning 2)
Ad

Similar to Norm referenced grading system (20)

PPTX
Criterion-Referenced Grading and Norm Grading system
PPT
Grading and Scoring Method presentation.ppt
PDF
A f powerpoint 1.27.12 webex
PPTX
Item Analysis and Validation
PPTX
educatiinar.pptx
PPTX
grades record dsn,k,nhj,kj.xbvbmnghghbbd
DOCX
Two-Scheme Grading Management and Student Profiling System
PDF
Individualized-Data-Report_Sample
PPTX
Range 1.1 and coeeficient of variance.
PPTX
Using ExamSoft Data for Item Revision and Faculty Development
PPTX
School Categorical Marking Criteria.pptx
PPT
assessment scoring and evaluation.ppt
PPT
Types of Test for Assessing Learning.ppt
PPTX
Assigning grades new
PPTX
Assessment of Learning 2
PPTX
Cit april 12 training
PPT
assessment waqas.ppt
PPTX
430660906-Item-Analysis.pptx
PPTX
item analysis.pptx education pnc item analysis
Criterion-Referenced Grading and Norm Grading system
Grading and Scoring Method presentation.ppt
A f powerpoint 1.27.12 webex
Item Analysis and Validation
educatiinar.pptx
grades record dsn,k,nhj,kj.xbvbmnghghbbd
Two-Scheme Grading Management and Student Profiling System
Individualized-Data-Report_Sample
Range 1.1 and coeeficient of variance.
Using ExamSoft Data for Item Revision and Faculty Development
School Categorical Marking Criteria.pptx
assessment scoring and evaluation.ppt
Types of Test for Assessing Learning.ppt
Assigning grades new
Assessment of Learning 2
Cit april 12 training
assessment waqas.ppt
430660906-Item-Analysis.pptx
item analysis.pptx education pnc item analysis
Ad

More from obemrosalia (9)

PPTX
Magna carta for public school teachers Art. 4670
PDF
Round rubin
PDF
Single elimination
PDF
Double elimination
PPTX
Behaviorism in philosophy of education
PPTX
Behaviorism as a philosophy of education
PPT
Thomas Hobbes
PPTX
intended vs implemented vs achieved curriculum
PPTX
kohlbergs stage of moral development
Magna carta for public school teachers Art. 4670
Round rubin
Single elimination
Double elimination
Behaviorism in philosophy of education
Behaviorism as a philosophy of education
Thomas Hobbes
intended vs implemented vs achieved curriculum
kohlbergs stage of moral development

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
GENETICS IN BIOLOGY IN SECONDARY LEVEL FORM 3
PPTX
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
PDF
LNK 2025 (2).pdf MWEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
PDF
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
PDF
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
PPTX
Digestion and Absorption of Carbohydrates, Proteina and Fats
PDF
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
PDF
احياء السادس العلمي - الفصل الثالث (التكاثر) منهج متميزين/كلية بغداد/موهوبين
PDF
RTP_AR_KS1_Tutor's Guide_English [FOR REPRODUCTION].pdf
PDF
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
DOC
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
PPTX
Introduction-to-Literarature-and-Literary-Studies-week-Prelim-coverage.pptx
PPTX
UNIT III MENTAL HEALTH NURSING ASSESSMENT
PPTX
Orientation - ARALprogram of Deped to the Parents.pptx
PDF
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
PDF
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
PPTX
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
PDF
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
PDF
advance database management system book.pdf
PPTX
Radiologic_Anatomy_of_the_Brachial_plexus [final].pptx
GENETICS IN BIOLOGY IN SECONDARY LEVEL FORM 3
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
LNK 2025 (2).pdf MWEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
Digestion and Absorption of Carbohydrates, Proteina and Fats
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
احياء السادس العلمي - الفصل الثالث (التكاثر) منهج متميزين/كلية بغداد/موهوبين
RTP_AR_KS1_Tutor's Guide_English [FOR REPRODUCTION].pdf
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
Introduction-to-Literarature-and-Literary-Studies-week-Prelim-coverage.pptx
UNIT III MENTAL HEALTH NURSING ASSESSMENT
Orientation - ARALprogram of Deped to the Parents.pptx
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
advance database management system book.pdf
Radiologic_Anatomy_of_the_Brachial_plexus [final].pptx

Norm referenced grading system

  • 2. My task; • Difficulties in Grading • Discuss what is norm-ref. • Norm-Referenced Grading System – Refers to a grading system where in a student performance is evaluated relatively to the performance of the other student. – Using the norm-ref. grading system, a student performance is evaluated relatively to the performance of other student within the group. – Also known as grading curve the teacher will be the one to set how many percent of the student in the class assign each grade if it is not stated in the grading policy.
  • 3. Some example: 1. Percentile rank, Formula: L-percentile, M-Score, N-no. of Observation. 2. Standard nine (stanine) are some example of norm-reference grading system. 3. Mean Formula: Norm-Referenced Grading System
  • 4. • Example – 10 student in different class with different scores. section A and B. – Midterm scores 100 items, same test paper. • Class A= ( 30,40,50,55,60,65,70,75,80,85) • Mean=61 • Class B=( 55,60,65,70,75,80,85,90,90,95,) • Mean=76 • Student in “A” class .Raw Score 75 Percentile score 80% • Student in “B” class .Raw Score 80 Percentile score 80% Norm-Referenced Grading System
  • 5. HOW TO GET THE MEAN? • Class A= ( 30,40,50,55,60,65,70,75,80,85) • Class B=( 55,60,65,70,75,80,85,90,90,95,) • CLASS “A” • = Or • Sol.= Mean= 61
  • 6. • Class A= ( 30,40,50,55,60,65,70,75,80,85) • Class B=( 55,60,65,70,75,80,85,90,90,95,) • CLASS “B” or Sol. = mean= 76 HOW TO GET THE MEAN?
  • 7. • Class A= ( 30,40,50,55,60,65,70,75,80,85) • Class B=(55,60,65,70,75,80,85,90,90,95,) • Student in “A” class .Raw Score 75 Percentile score 80% = =7.5 or 8 observation “A” • 80% observation is less than 75 and 20% is greater than 85. • Student in “B” class .Raw Score 90 Percentile score 80% =8.5 observation “B” -80% observation is less than 90and 20% is greater than 90.
  • 8. • Student in “A” class .Raw Score 75 Percentile score 80% = 7.5 or 8 observation “A” • Student in “B” class .Raw Score 90 Percentile score 80% = 8.5 observation “B” • The following examples shows some of the of the difficulty associated with Norm-Reference Grading System. • -Problem equivalency . Class A= ( 30,40,50,55,60,65,70,75,80,85) Class B=( 55,60,65,70,75,80,85,90,90,95,)
  • 9. • Indeed if one of the test used in the two classes are the same, it would be rather unfair. • This problem called Problem of Equivalency. • One of example here a valedictorian , one from some remote area rural high school and second a valedictorian from a popular universities in urban area. -Does one expect the same level of competence for these two valedictorian? Rural school Urban school Level of Competence Norm-Reference Grading System
  • 10. If Mr. Ryan score is 75? • Class A= ( 30,40,50,55,60,65,70,75,80,85) • Mean=61 • Percentile score 80% • Pass or Fail ? Example..
  • 11. Stanine Diagram Mean 61 Raw Score= 75 Stanine 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Raw score 30 40 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 Poor BLW AV. Average above Average failure failure pass pass Class A= ( 30,40,50,55,60,65,70,75,80,85)
  • 12. Norm-Referenced Grading System Grading equivalent Raw score Above average 75-85 Average (fair) 61-84 Below average (failure) 50-60 Poor (failure) 30-49 Raw score (Class A) 1-100 item exam -If Mr. Ryan score is 75?
  • 13. Percentile Rank, • Formula • L -percentile, • M -Score, • N -no. of Observation. • Sol. = =7.5 or 8 = 80% observation is less than 75 and 20% is greater than 85. Class “A” ( 30,40,50,55,60,65,70,75,80,85)
  • 14. Norm-Referenced Grading System • Dasd • Other example…
  • 15. Advantage 1. It is very easy to use. 2. It works well for the course with retention policies and it limits only few students to advance to the next level. 3. It useful if the focus of the individual achievement of the student 4. It is appropriate to the large number of student. 5. It does not encourage cooperate among the student. Norm-Referenced Grading System Disadvantage 1. The performance of the student is not determined by his achievement, but also the achievement of the other students. 2. It promote competition among the students rather than cooperation. 3. It cannot be used when the class size is smaller than 40. 4. Not all students can pass the given subject or cours.